Zakopcanik M, Kavan D, Novak P, Loginov DS. Quantifying the Impact of the Peptide Identification Framework on the Results of Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Protein Analysis.
J Proteome Res 2024;
23:609-617. [PMID:
38158558 PMCID:
PMC10845142 DOI:
10.1021/acs.jproteome.3c00390]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Fast Photochemical Oxidation of Proteins (FPOP) is a promising technique for studying protein structure and dynamics. The quality of insight provided by FPOP depends on the reliability of the determination of the modification site. This study investigates the performance of two search engines, Mascot and PEAKS, for the data processing of FPOP analyses. Comparison of Mascot and PEAKS of the hemoglobin--haptoglobin Bruker timsTOF data set (PXD021621) revealed greater consistency in the Mascot identification of modified peptides, with around 26% of the IDs being mutual for all three replicates, compared to approximately 22% for PEAKS. The intersection between Mascot and PEAKS results revealed a limited number (31%) of shared modified peptides. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) using the peptide-spectrum match (PSM) score, site probability, and peptide intensity was applied to evaluate the results, and the analyses revealed distinct clusters of modified peptides. Mascot showed the ability to assess confident site determination, even with lower PSM scores. However, high PSM scores from PEAKS did not guarantee a reliable determination of the modification site. Fragmentation coverage of the modification position played a crucial role in Mascot assignments, while the AScore localizations from PEAKS often become ambiguous because the software employs MS/MS merging.
Collapse