The Role of the Cerebral Cortex in Pain Sensation

Comparative investigation of analgesic tolerance to taurine, sodium salicylate and morphine: Involvement of peripheral muscarinic receptors

Nowadays various analgesic medications are used for the management of acute and chronic pain. Among these opioid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs stand in the first line of therapy, however, prolonged administration of these substance is generally challenged by development of analgesic tolerance in patients. Therefore, it is highly valuable to find new pharmacological strategies for prolonged therapeutic procedures. In this respect, Taurine, a free amino acid, has been shown to induce significant analgesia at both spinal and peripheral levels through cholinergic mechanisms. In the present study, we used hot-plate analgesic test to investigate how taurine either as a single medication or in combination with sodium salicylate and morphine may affect both acute response to pain and development of analgesic tolerance. The effect of taurine was also tested on morphine withdrawal syndrome. Hyoscine butyl bromide was used to assess the role of muscarinic receptors in taurine-mediated effects. Finally, biochemical assay was done to reveal how the activity of brain acetylcholinesterase may change in relation with muscarinic receptor activity. Results indicated that acute administration of taurine-sodium salicylate combination causes more potent analgesia compared to the use of tau (but not SS alone) and this seems to be mediated via activity of muscarinic receptors in peripheral nervous system. Furthermore, the effect of this combination undergoes less analgesic tolerance during time. Combination of taurine and morphine is an effective strategy to attenuate both morphine analgesic tolerance and dependence and this also seems to depend on activity of muscarinic receptors, however through differential cellular mechanisms.

A nociresponsive specific area of human somatosensory cortex within BA3a: BA3c?

It is well recognized that in primates, including humans, noxious body stimulation evokes a neural response in the posterior bank of the central sulcus, in Brodmann cytoarchitectonic subdivisions 3b and 1 of the primary somatosensory cortex. This response is associated with the 1st/sharp pain and contributes to sensory discriminative aspects of pain perception and spatial localization of the noxious stimulus. However, neurophysiological studies in New World monkeys predict that in humans noxious stimulation also evokes a separate neural response-mediated by C-afferent drive and associated with the 2nd/burning pain-in the depth of the central sulcus in Brodmann area 3a (BA3a) at the transition between the somatosensory and motor cortices. To evoke such a response, it is necessary to use multi-second duration noxious stimulation, rather than brief laser pulses. Given the limited human pain-imaging literature on cortical responses induced by C-nociceptive input specifically within BA3a, here we used high spatial resolution 7T fMRI to study the response to thermonoxious skin stimulation. We observed the predicted response of BA3a in the depth of the central sulcus in five human volunteers. Review of the available evidence suggests that the nociresponsive region in the depth of the central sulcus is a structurally and functionally distinct cortical area that should not be confused with proprioceptive BA3a. It is most likely engaged in interoception and control of the autonomic nervous system, and contributes to the sympathetic response to noxious stimulation, arguably the most intolerable aspect of pain experience. Ablation of this region has been shown to reduce pain sensibility and might offer an effective means of ameliorating some pathological pain conditions.

Cortical representation of pain in primary sensory-motor areas (S1/M1)--a study using intracortical recordings in humans

Intracortical evoked potentials to nonnoxious Aβ (electrical) and noxious Aδ (laser) stimuli within the human primary somatosensory (S1) and motor (M1) areas were recorded from 71 electrode sites in 9 epileptic patients. All cortical sites responding to specific noxious inputs also responded to nonnoxious stimuli, while the reverse was not always true. Evoked responses in S1 area 3b were systematic for nonnoxious inputs, but seen in only half of cases after nociceptive stimulation. Nociceptive responses were systematically recorded when electrode tracks reached the crown of the postcentral gyrus, consistent with an origin in somatosensory areas 1-2. Sites in the precentral cortex also exhibited noxious and nonnoxious responses with phase reversals indicating a local origin in area 4 (M1). We conclude that a representation of thermal nociceptive information does exist in human S1, although to a much lesser extent than the nonnociceptive one. Notably, area 3b, which responds massively to nonnoxious Aβ activation was less involved in the processing of noxious heat. S1 and M1 responses to noxious heat occurred at latencies comparable to those observed in the supra-sylvian opercular region of the same patients, suggesting a parallel, rather than hierarchical, processing of noxious inputs in S1, M1 and opercular cortex. This study provides the first direct evidence for a spinothalamic related input to the motor cortex in humans.

Dipole source analyses of laser evoked potentials obtained from subdural grid recordings from primary somatic sensory cortex

The cortical potentials evoked by cutaneous application of a laser stimulus (laser evoked potentials, LEP) often include potentials in the primary somatic sensory cortex (S1), which may be located within the subdivisions of S1 including Brodmann areas 3A, 3B, 1, and 2. The precise location of the LEP generator may clarify the pattern of activation of human S1 by painful stimuli. We now test the hypothesis that the generators of the LEP are located in human Brodmann area 1 or 3A within S1. Local field potential (LFP) source analysis of the LEP was obtained from subdural grids over sensorimotor cortex in two patients undergoing epilepsy surgery. The relationship of LEP dipoles was compared with dipoles for somatic sensory potentials evoked by median nerve stimulation (SEP) and recorded in area 3B (see Baumgärtner U, Vogel H, Ohara S, Treede RD, Lenz FA. J Neurophysiol 104: 3029-3041, 2010). Both patients had an early radial dipole in S1. The LEP dipole was located medial, anterior, and deep to the SEP dipole, which suggests a nociceptive dipole in area 3A. One patient had a later tangential dipole with positivity posterior, which is opposite to the orientation of the SEP dipole in area 3B. The reversal of orientations between modalities is consistent with the cortical surface negative orientation resulting from superficial termination of thalamocortical neurons that receive inputs from the spinothalamic tract. Therefore, the present results suggest that the LEP may result in a radial dipole consistent with a generator in area 3A and a putative later tangential generator in area 3B.

Abnormal activity of primary somatosensory cortex in central pain syndrome

Central pain syndrome (CPS) is a debilitating and chronic pain condition that results from a lesion or dysfunction in the CNS. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying CPS are poorly understood. We recently demonstrated that CPS is associated with suppressed inputs from the inhibitory nucleus zona incerta to the posterior thalamus (PO). As a consequence, activity in PO is abnormally increased in CPS. Because the perception of pain requires activity in the cerebral cortex, CPS must also involve abnormal cortical activity. Here we test the hypothesis that CPS is associated with increased activity in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI), a major projection target of PO that plays an important role in processing sensory-discriminative aspects of pain. We recorded activity of single units in SI in rats with CPS resulting from spinal cord lesions. Consistent with our hypothesis, SI neurons recorded from lesioned rats exhibited significantly higher spontaneous firing rates and greater responses evoked by innocuous and noxious mechanical stimulation of the hindpaw compared with control rats. Neurons from lesioned rats also showed a greater tendency than controls to fire bursts of action potentials in response to noxious stimuli. Thus, the excruciatingly painful symptoms of CPS may result, at least in part, from abnormally increased activity in SI.

Altered pain and thermal sensation in subjects with isolated parietal and insular cortical lesions

Studies of sensory function following cortical lesions have often included lesions which multiple cortical, white matter, and thalamic structures. We now test the hypothesis that lesions anatomically constrained to particular insular and parietal structures and their subjacent white matter are associated with different patterns of sensory loss. Sensory loss was measured by quantitative sensory testing (QST), and evaluated statistically within patients relative to normal values. All seven subjects with insular and/or parietal lesions demonstrated thermal hypoesthesia, although the etiology of the lesions was heterogeneous. Cold and heat hypoalgesia were only found in the subject with the most extensive parietal and insular lesion, which occurred in utero. Cold allodynia occurred clinically and by thresholds in two subjects with isolated ischemic lesions of the posterior insular/retroinsular cortex, and by thresholds in two subjects with a lesion of parietal cortex with little or no insular involvement. Central pain occurred in the two subjects with clinical allodynia secondary to isolated lesions of the posterior insular/retroinsular cortex, which spared the anterior and posterior parietal cortex. These results suggest that nonpainful cold and heat sensations are jointly mediated by parietal and insular cortical structures so that lesions anywhere in this system may diminish sensitivity. In contrast, thermal pain is more robust requiring larger cortical lesions of these same structures to produce hypoalgesia. In addition, cold allodynia can result from restricted lesions that also produce thermal hypoesthesia, but not from all such lesions.

Neurophysiological techniques to assess pain in animals

Neurophysiological techniques are widely applied to animals, both in the search as a monitor for adequacy of anaesthesia, and studies to assess the efficacy of analgesic agents. Laboratory animals have been extensively used in models to investigate pain in man. However a substantial number of studies have also used neurophysiological techniques to increase knowledge of pain in specific animal species, with the aim of improving animal welfare. This review provides an overview of neurophysiological techniques involving the brain that have been used in the assessment of pain in animals. An explanation of the methodology of EEG recording, with particular emphasis on veterinary studies, is given. Neurophysiological models developed to assess pain in different species are described, and their relevance to advancements in animal welfare or best clinical practice indicated.

Psychophysics of CNS Pain-Related Activity: Binary and Analog Channels and Memory Encoding

The forebrain neuronal system signaling pain has been poorly characterized. The pain pathway afferent to the thalamus may be a labeled line consisting of neurons in the pain-signaling pathway to the brain (spinothalamic tract, STT) that respond only to painful stimuli. It has recently been proposed that the STT contains a series of analog-labeled lines, each signaling a different aspect of the internal state of the body (interoception), for example, visceral/cold/itch sensations. In this view, pain is the unpleasant emotion produced by disequilibrium of the internal state. The authors now show that stimulation of an STT receiving zone (thalamic principal somatic sensory nucleus, ventral caudal) in awake humans produces two different exteroceptive responses. The first is a binary response signaling the presence of painful stimuli. The second is an analog response in which nonpainful and painful sensations are graded with intensity of the stimulus. Such stimulation can evoke both the sensory and emotional components of previously experienced pain. These results illustrate the diverse functions of human pain signaling pathways.

Temporal Analysis of Cortical Mechanisms for Pain Relief by Tactile Stimuli in Humans

The mechanisms by which vibrotactile stimuli relieve pain are not well understood, especially in humans. We recorded cortical magnetic responses to paired noxious (intra-epidermal electrical stimulation, IES) and innocuous (transcutaneous electrical stimulation, TS) stimuli applied to the back at a conditioning-test interval (CTI) of -500 to 500 ms. Results showed that IES-induced responses were remarkably attenuated when TS was applied 20-60 ms later and 0-500 ms earlier than IES (CTI = -60 to 500 ms). Since the signals evoked by IES reached the spinal cord (CTI = -60 to -20 ms conditions) and the cortex (-60 and -40 ms condition) earlier than those evoked by TS, the present results indicate that cortical responses to noxious stimuli can be inhibited by innocuous tactile stimuli at the cortical level, with minimal contribution at the spinal level.

Kortikale Repr�sentation von Schmerz

Contrary to the traditional view that the cerebral cortex is not involved in pain perception an extensive cortical network associated with pain processing has been revealed during the past decades. This network consistently includes the primary (S1) and secondary somatosensory cortices (S2), the insular cortex, and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). These cortical areas are organized in parallel and contribute to different dimensions of pain experience. The S1 cortex is mainly involved in discriminative aspects of pain, while the S2 cortex seems to have an important role in cognitive aspects of pain perception. The insula has been proposed to be involved in autonomic reactions to noxious stimuli and in pain-related learning and memory. The ACC is closely related to pain affect and may subserve the integration of general affect, cognition, and response selection. Furthermore, first pain appears to be particularly related to activation of S1 whereas second pain is closely related to ACC activation.

Attention to a painful cutaneous laser stimulus modulates electrocorticographic event-related desynchronization in humans

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that attention to painful cutaneous laser stimuli enhances event-related desynchronization (ERD) in cortical regions receiving nociceptive input.

METHODS

We used wavelet time-frequency analysis and bandpass filtering to measure ERD quantitatively in subdural electrocorticographic recordings while subjects either attended to, or were distracted from, a painful cutaneous laser stimulus.

RESULTS

ERD were observed over primary somatosensory and parasylvian (PS) cortices in all 4 subjects, and over medial frontal cortex in 1 subject. Laser-evoked potentials were also observed in all 3 regions. In all subjects, ERD was more widespread and intense, particularly over PS, during attention to laser stimuli (counting stimuli) than during distraction from the stimuli (reading for comprehension).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that pain-associated ERD is modulated by attention, particularly over PS.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study suggests that thalamocortical circuits are involved in attentional modulation of pain because of the proposed role of these circuits in the mechanisms of ERD.

Cutaneous Painful Laser Stimuli Evoke Responses Recorded Directly From Primary Somatosensory Cortex in Awake Humans

Negative and positive laser evoked potential (LEP) peaks (N2*, P2**) were simultaneously recorded from the primary somatosensory (SI), parasylvian, and medial frontal (MF: anterior cingulate and supplementary motor area) cortical surfaces through subdural electrodes implanted for the surgical treatment of intractable epilepsy. Distribution of the LEP N2*and P2**peaks was estimated to be in cortical areas (SI, parasylvian, and MF) identified by anatomic criteria, by their response to innocuous vibratory stimulation of a finger (v-SEP), and to electrical stimulation of the median nerve (e-SEP). The maximum of the LEP N2*peak was located on the CS, medial (dorsal) to the finger motor area, as determined by cortical stimulation, and to the finger somatosensory area, as determined from the e-SEP and v-SEP. This finding suggests that the generator source of the LEP N2*peak in SI was different from that of e-SEP or v-SEP in Brodmann's areas 3b or 1. In parasylvian and MF, polarity reversal was often observed, indicating tangential current sources in these regions. In contrast to e-SEP and v-SEP, the LEP N2*latency over SI was not shorter than that over the parasylvian region. The amplitude of N2*was larger over SI than over MF and the latencies of the LEP peaks in those 2 regions were different. These findings provide evidence for a significant LEP generator in the postcentral gyrus, perhaps SI cortex, that is situated outside the tactile homunculus in SI and that receives its input arising from nociceptors simultaneously with parasylvian and MF cortex.

Brain processing of esophageal sensation in health and disease

This case study demonstrates that patients with NCCP can be subclassified on the basis of sensory responsiveness and neurophysiologic profiles. This approach identifies specific abnormalities within the CNS processing of esophageal sensation in individual patients, allowing us to objectively differentiate those with sensitized esophageal afferents from those that are hypervigilant to esophageal sensations. The importance of this approach is to underline that NCCP comprises a heterogeneous group of patients. and only when we have defined the phenotype of this condition and identified groups of patients with specific CNS abnormalities will it be possible to perform clinical studies aimed at answering specific hypotheses. The development of a comprehensive pathophysiologic model that identifies the specific causes of symptoms in patients with esophageal hypersensitivity will allow the future management strategies of these patients to be targeted more specifically and efficiently. This will have great benefits to patients'well-being and health care use.

Cortical representation of first and second pain sensation in humans

Single painful stimuli evoke two successive and qualitatively distinct sensations referred to as first and second pain sensation. Peripherally, the neural basis of this phenomenon is a dual pathway for pain with Adelta and C fibers mediating first and second pain, respectively. Yet, the differential cortical correlates of both sensations are largely unknown. We therefore used magnetoencephalography to record and directly compare first and second pain-related cortical responses to cutaneous laser stimuli in humans. Our results show that brief painful stimuli evoke sustained cortical activity corresponding to sustained pain perception comprising early first pain-related and late second pain-related components. Cortical activity was located in primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortices and anterior cingulate cortex. Time courses of activations disclosed that first pain was particularly related to activation of S1 whereas second pain was closely related to anterior cingulate cortex activation. Both sensations were associated with S2 activation. These results correspond to the different perceptual characteristics of both sensations and probably reflect different biological functions of first and second pain. First pain signals threat and provides precise sensory information for an immediate withdrawal, whereas second pain attracts longer-lasting attention and motivates behavioral responses to limit further injury and optimize recovery.

Descending control of pain

Upon receipt in the dorsal horn (DH) of the spinal cord, nociceptive (pain-signalling) information from the viscera, skin and other organs is subject to extensive processing by a diversity of mechanisms, certain of which enhance, and certain of which inhibit, its transfer to higher centres. In this regard, a network of descending pathways projecting from cerebral structures to the DH plays a complex and crucial role. Specific centrifugal pathways either suppress (descending inhibition) or potentiate (descending facilitation) passage of nociceptive messages to the brain. Engagement of descending inhibition by the opioid analgesic, morphine, fulfils an important role in its pain-relieving properties, while induction of analgesia by the adrenergic agonist, clonidine, reflects actions at alpha(2)-adrenoceptors (alpha(2)-ARs) in the DH normally recruited by descending pathways. However, opioids and adrenergic agents exploit but a tiny fraction of the vast panoply of mechanisms now known to be involved in the induction and/or expression of descending controls. For example, no drug interfering with descending facilitation is currently available for clinical use. The present review focuses on: (1) the organisation of descending pathways and their pathophysiological significance; (2) the role of individual transmitters and specific receptor types in the modulation and expression of mechanisms of descending inhibition and facilitation and (3) the advantages and limitations of established and innovative analgesic strategies which act by manipulation of descending controls. Knowledge of descending pathways has increased exponentially in recent years, so this is an opportune moment to survey their operation and therapeutic relevance to the improved management of pain.

Differential coding of pain intensity in the human primary and secondary somatosensory cortex

The primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices have been shown to participate in human pain processing. However, in humans it is unclear how SI and SII contribute to the encoding of nociceptive stimulus intensity. Using magnetoencephalography (MEG) we recorded responses in SI and SII in eight healthy humans to four different intensities of selectively nociceptive laser stimuli delivered to the dorsum of the right hand. Subjects' pain ratings correlated highly with the applied stimulus intensity. Activation of contralateral SI and bilateral SII showed a significant positive correlation with stimulus intensity. However, the type of dependence on stimulus intensity was different for SI and SII. The relation between SI activity and stimulus intensity resembled an exponential function and matched closely the subjects' pain ratings. In contrast, SII activity showed an S-shaped function with a sharp increase in amplitude only at a stimulus intensity well above pain threshold. The activation pattern of SI suggests participation of SI in the discriminative perception of pain intensity. In contrast, the all-or-none-like activation pattern of SII points against a significant contribution of SII to the sensory-discriminative aspects of pain perception. Instead, SII may subserve recognition of the noxious nature and attention toward painful stimuli.

Opioid peptide messenger RNA expression is increased at spinal and supraspinal levels following excitotoxic spinal cord injury

Spinal cord injury in rats is known to cause anatomical, physiological and molecular changes within the spinal cord. These changes may account for behavioral syndromes that appear following spinal cord injury, syndromes believed to be related to the clinical condition of chronic pain. Intraspinal injection of quisqualic acid produces an excitotoxic injury with pathological characteristics similar to those associated with ischemic and traumatic spinal cord injury. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated changes in blood flow, neuronal excitability and gene expression in the brain following excitotoxic injury, indicating that behavioral changes may result from modification of neuronal substrates at supraspinal levels of the neuraxis. Because changes in spinal opioid peptide expression have been demonstrated in models of traumatic spinal cord injury and chronic pain, the present study investigated messenger RNA expression of the opioid peptides, preproenkephalin and preprodynorphin, at spinal and supraspinal levels following excitotoxic spinal cord injury. Male, Long-Evans rats were given three intraspinal injections of quisqualic acid (total 1.2 microl, 125mM). After one, three, five, seven or 10days, animals were killed and quantitative in situ hybridization performed on regions of the spinal cord surrounding the lesion site, as well as whole-brain sections through various levels of the thalamus. Preproenkephalin and preprodynorphin expression was increased in spinal cord areas adjacent to the site of quisqualic injection and in cortical regions associated with nociceptive function, preproenkephalin in the cingulate cortex and preprodynorphin in the parietal cortex, both ipsilaterally and contralaterally at various time-points following injury. These results further our knowledge of the secondary events that occur following spinal cord injury, specifically implicating supraspinal opioid systems in the CNS response to spinal cord injury.

Direct Evidence of Nociceptive Input to Human Anterior Cingulate Gyrus and Parasylvian Cortex

Many lines of evidence implicate the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC, Brodmann's area 24) and parasylvian cortex in pain perception. Clinical studies demonstrate alterations in pain and temperature sensation after lesions of these structures. Imaging studies reveal increased blood flow in ACC and parasylvian cortex, both ipsilateral and contralateral to painful stimuli. Additionally, painful stimuli evoke potentials that seem to arise from these cortical structures. Short-duration cutaneous stimulation with a CO(2) laser evokes pain-related potentials (LEPs) with a vertex maximum and an initial negative peak followed by a positive wave. The cutaneous laser stimulus evokes a pure pain sensation due to selective activation of cutaneous nociceptors. Electrical source modeling has suggested that the vertex maximum of the scalp LEP arises, in part, from generators in the cingulate gyrus and parasylvian cortex. Thus, imaging and electrophysiologic studies suggest that these cortical structures are activated by painful stimuli. However, these studies incorporate multiple assumptions and therefore do not establish the presence of nociceptive inputs to ACC and parasylvian cortex. We review our recent reports of intracranial potentials evoked by painful stimuli. These studies provide direct evidence of nociceptive inputs to the human ACC and parasylvian cortex.

Examination of the Role of the Cerebral Cortex in the Perception of Pain Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

In the following review we outline several of the unique difficulties associated with designing and interpreting functional imaging studies of pain perception. Unlike other sensory modalities, the cortical processing of pain is unique, as is the pain experience itself. Unlike other sensory systems, pain processing does not take place in one dedicated region of the cortex. Rather, nociceptive cells are sparsely distributed through the somatosensory cortex. Further, pain is singular in that it has both sensory-discriminative and affective-motivational components, which are probably subserved by different neuroanatomic substrates. Finally, abnormal pain sensation, such as neuropathic pain syndromes, may have different or additional mechanisms that require special consideration. We have illustrated these points with examples from our own work on acute pain and secondary mechanical hyperalgesia, and work from other laboratories.

Neurophysiology of Cancer Pain: From the Laboratory to the Clinic

Pain is one of the most distressing symptoms associated with cancer. Basic science research has provided much insight into the mechanisms of peripheral and central pain and the actions of new drugs. Despite these advances, pain accompanying malignancy can be difficult to treat. Pain most commonly presents when the tumor has invaded somatic,visceral, or neural structures. An understanding of pain mechanisms is essential when deciding on the appropriate treatment. New therapeutic options have been developed and will hopefully provide clinicians with tools to successfully alleviate cancer pain.

The somatosensory evoked magnetic fields

Averaged magnetoencephalography (MEG) following somatosensory stimulation, somatosensory evoked magnetic field(s) (SEF), in humans are reviewed. The equivalent current dipole(s) (ECD) of the primary and the following middle-latency components of SEF following electrical stimulation within 80-100 ms are estimated in area 3b of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI), the posterior bank of the central sulcus, in the hemisphere contralateral to the stimulated site. Their sites are generally compatible with the homunculus which was reported by Penfield using direct cortical stimulation during surgery. SEF to passive finger movement is generated in area 3a or 2 of SI, unlike with electrical stimulation. Long-latency components with peaks of approximately 80-120 ms are recorded in the bilateral hemispheres and their ECD are estimated in the secondary somatosensory cortex (SII) in the bilateral hemispheres. We also summarized (1) the gating effects on SEF by interference tactile stimulation or movement applied to the stimulus site, (2) clinical applications of SEF in the fields of neurosurgery and neurology and (3) cortical plasticity (reorganization) of the SI. SEF specific to painful stimulation is also recorded following painful stimulation by CO(2) laser beam. Pain-specific components are recorded over 150 ms after the stimulus and their ECD are estimated in the bilateral SII and the limbic system. We introduced a newly-developed multi (12)-channel gradiometer system with the smallest and highest quality superconducting quantum interference device (micro-SQUID) available to non-invasively detect the magnetic fields of a human peripheral nerve. Clear nerve action fields (NAFs) were consistently recorded from all subjects.

Limbically Augmented Pain Syndrome (LAPS): Kindling, Corticolimbic Sensitization, and the Convergence of Affective and Sensory Symptoms in Chronic Pain Disorders

There is abundant clinical evidence that depression occurs with high frequency among chronic pain patients. When compared with other serious medical disorders, the prevalence of depression in chronic pain appears high. The fundamental reason for this association is unknown. Theories have attempted to explain the link between pain and depression in terms of psychologic mechanisms. Other theories highlight shared neurobiologic substrates. However, a comprehensive theory integrating biologic and psychologic viewpoints remains elusive. In this article, we draw on research on neuroplastic processes in corticolimbic structures to model the linkage between the sensory and affective domains of pain. Our hypothesis is based on kindling experiments in animals that elucidate the complex neurobiologic mechanisms that transduce exteroceptive and interoceptive stimuli into "memory" at the cellular/synaptic level. This experimental model has found application in the affective disorders to explain how a person's history of exposure to psychologic trauma configures the neurobiologic substrate for later-amplified pathologic response. In applying kindling research to pain, we begin by reviewing the literature on nociception-induced neuroplasticity at the corticolimbic level. We suggest that kindling and related models of neuroplasticity can be used to describe ways in which exposure to a noxious stimulus may, under certain conditions, lead to a sensitized corticolimbic state. This sensitized state can be described in terms of the kindling properties of amplification, spontaneity, neuroanatomic spreading, and cross-sensitization. A case example illustrates how these properties offer a neurobiologic framework for understanding the sensory/affective/behavioral symptom complex seen in a subset of chronic pain patients. These patients are characterized by atypical and treatment-refractory pain complaints, in association with disturbances of mood, sleep, energy, libido, memory/concentration, behavior, and stress intolerance. We introduce the term "limbically augmented pain syndrome" to describe this symptom complex.

Differential organization of touch and pain in human primary somatosensory cortex

Processing of tactile stimuli within somatosensory cortices has been shown to be complex and hierarchically organized. However, the precise organization of nociceptive processing within these cortices has remained largely unknown. We used whole-head magnetoencephalography to directly compare cortical responses to stimulation of tactile and nociceptive afferents of the dorsum of the hand in humans. Within the primary somatosensory cortex (SI), nociceptive stimuli activated a single source whereas tactile stimuli activated two sequentially peaking sources. Along the postcentral gyrus, the nociceptive SI source was located 10 mm more medially than the early tactile SI response arising from cytoarchitectonical area 3b and corresponded spatially to the later tactile SI response. Considering a mediolateral location difference between the hand representations of cytoarchitectonical areas 3b and 1, the present results suggest generation of the single nociceptive response in area 1, whereas tactile stimuli activate sequentially peaking sources in areas 3b and 1. Thus nociceptive processing apparently does not share the complex and hierarchical organization of tactile processing subserving elaborated sensory capacities. This difference in the organization of both modalities may reflect that pain perception rather requires reactions to and avoidance of harmful stimuli than sophisticated sensory capacities.

Magnetoencephalographic responses to painful impact stimulation

Magnetoencephalographic (MEG) field recordings are unique to detect current dipoles in SI and SII. Few devices are available for painful mechanical stimulation in magnetically shielded MEG rooms. The aim of the present MEG (dual 37-channel biomagnetometer) study was to investigate the location of the cortical generators evoked by painful impact stimuli of different intensities. An airgun was placed outside the shielded MEG room, and small plastic bullets were fired at the arm and trunk of the subjects in the room. The velocity of the bullet was measured and related to the evoked pain intensity. Stimuli were delivered for each of the following three conditions: strong pain intensity elicited from the upper arm and upper trunk; weak pain intensity elicited from the upper trunk. The evoked MEG responses had a major component with the characteristically polarity-reversal deflections indicating a dipole located beneath the coils. The response could be estimated by a single current dipole. When the estimated locations of the dipoles were superimposed on the individual magnetic resonance images (MRIs), consistent bilateral activation of areas corresponding to the secondary sensory cortices (SII) was found.

Pain and functional imaging

Functional neuroimaging has fundamentally changed our knowledge about the cerebral representation of pain. For the first time it has been possible to delineate the functional anatomy of different aspects of pain in the medial and lateral pain systems in the brain. The rapid developments in imaging methods over the past years have led to a consensus in the description of the central pain responses between different studies and also to a definition of a central pain matrix with specialized subfunctions in man. In the near future we will see studies where a systems perspective allows for a better understanding of the regulatory mechanisms in the higher-order frontal and parietal cortices. Also, pending the development of experimental paradigms, the functional anatomy of the emotional aspects of pain will become better known.

Parallel activation of primary and secondary somatosensory cortices in human pain processing

Cerebral processing of pain has been shown to involve primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices. However, the temporal activation pattern of these cortices in nociceptive processing has not been demonstrated so far. We therefore used whole-head magnetoencephalography to record cortical responses to cutaneous laser stimuli in six healthy human subjects. By using selective nociceptive stimuli our results confirm involvement of contralateral SI and bilateral SII in human pain processing. Beyond they show for the first time simultaneous activation onset of contralateral SI and SII after approximately 130 ms, indicating parallel thalamocortical distribution of nociceptive information. This contrasts to the serial cortical organization of tactile processing in higher primates and instead corresponds to the parallel cortical organization in lower primates and nonprimates. Thus our finding suggests preservation of the basic mammalian parallel organizational scheme in human pain processing, whereas in the tactile modality parallel organization appears to be abandoned in favor of a serial processing scheme. Functionally, preservation of direct access to SII underscores the relevance of this area in human pain processing, probably reflecting an important role of SII in nociceptive learning and memory.

Cortical activation during oesophageal stimulation: a neuromagnetic study

We investigated the neuromagnetic responses to mechanical stimulation of the oesophagus. In six healthy right-handed volunteers (mean age 31.6 years) the proximal and distal oesophagus were stimulated by electronically controlled pump-inflation of a silicone balloon once every 4.5-5.5 sec (dwell time 145 msec). The balloon volume was adjusted to induce different sensation levels (i) just above threshold of perception, (ii) strong sensation and (iii) painful sensation. Evoked magnetic brain responses were recorded time-locked to stimulus onset with a Neuromag-122TM whole-head neuromagnetometer and modelled as equivalent current diploe (ECD) sources. ECDs were superimposed on individual magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Magnetic brain responses following distal oesophageal stimulation were adequately explained by a time-varying 2-4 dipole model with unilateral or bilateral sources in second somatosensory cortex and later sources in the frontal cortex. With increasing stimulus intensities, latencies of the sources decreased and amplitudes increased. Proximal oesophageal stimulation led to activation of source areas spatially similar to those of distal oesophageal stimulation but with shorter response latencies. Both painful and nonpainful mechanical stimulation of the oesophagus activate the second somatosensory cortex (SII). Evidence for topographic organization of oesophageal afferents in SII is poor.

Comparison of touch- and laser heat-evoked cortical field potentials in conscious rats

Field potentials and multiunit activities from chronically implanted cortical electrodes were used to study tactile and nociceptive information processing from the tail of the rat. Fourteen stainless steel screws implanted in the skull were used as electrodes to record field potentials in different cortical areas. Electrical, mechanical, and laser pulses were applied to the tail to induce evoked cortical field potentials. Evoked responses were compared before and after sodium pentobarbital anesthesia (50 mg/kg, i.p.). In both electrical- and mechanical-evoked potential (EEP and MEP) studies, two major peaks were found in the conscious animal. The polarity of the late component was modified after pentobarbital anesthesia. In the laser-evoked potential (LEP) study, two distinct negative peaks were found. Both peaks were very sensitive to anesthesia. Following quantitative analysis, our data suggest that the first positive peak of EEP and MEP corresponded to the activation of the Abeta fiber, the second negative peak of MEP and the first peak of LEP corresponded to Adelta fiber activation, while the second peak of LEP corresponded to C fiber activation. The absolute magnitudes of all cortical components were positively related to the intensity of the stimulation. From spatial mapping analysis, a localized concentric source of field potential was observed in the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) only after activation of the Abeta fiber. Larger responsive cortical areas were found in response to Adelta and C fiber activation. In an intracortical recording experiment, both tactile and nociceptive stimulation evoked heightened unit activity changes at latencies corresponding to respective field potentials. We conclude that different cortical areas are involved in the processing of A and C fiber afferent inputs, and barbiturate anesthesia modifies their processing.

The induction of pain: an integrative review

The highly disagreeable sensation of pain results from an extraordinarily complex and interactive series of mechanisms integrated at all levels of the neuroaxis, from the periphery, via the dorsal horn to higher cerebral structures. Pain is usually elicited by the activation of specific nociceptors ('nociceptive pain'). However, it may also result from injury to sensory fibres, or from damage to the CNS itself ('neuropathic pain'). Although acute and subchronic, nociceptive pain fulfils a warning role, chronic and/or severe nociceptive and neuropathic pain is maladaptive. Recent years have seen a progressive unravelling of the neuroanatomical circuits and cellular mechanisms underlying the induction of pain. In addition to familiar inflammatory mediators, such as prostaglandins and bradykinin, potentially-important, pronociceptive roles have been proposed for a variety of 'exotic' species, including protons, ATP, cytokines, neurotrophins (growth factors) and nitric oxide. Further, both in the periphery and in the CNS, non-neuronal glial and immunecompetent cells have been shown to play a modulatory role in the response to inflammation and injury, and in processes modifying nociception. In the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, wherein the primary processing of nociceptive information occurs, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors are activated by glutamate released from nocisponsive afferent fibres. Their activation plays a key role in the induction of neuronal sensitization, a process underlying prolonged painful states. In addition, upon peripheral nerve injury, a reduction of inhibitory interneurone tone in the dorsal horn exacerbates sensitized states and further enhance nociception. As concerns the transfer of nociceptive information to the brain, several pathways other than the classical spinothalamic tract are of importance: for example, the postsynaptic dorsal column pathway. In discussing the roles of supraspinal structures in pain sensation, differences between its 'discriminative-sensory' and 'affective-cognitive' dimensions should be emphasized. The purpose of the present article is to provide a global account of mechanisms involved in the induction of pain. Particular attention is focused on cellular aspects and on the consequences of peripheral nerve injury. In the first part of the review, neuronal pathways for the transmission of nociceptive information from peripheral nerve terminals to the dorsal horn, and therefrom to higher centres, are outlined. This neuronal framework is then exploited for a consideration of peripheral, spinal and supraspinal mechanisms involved in the induction of pain by stimulation of peripheral nociceptors, by peripheral nerve injury and by damage to the CNS itself. Finally, a hypothesis is forwarded that neurotrophins may play an important role in central, adaptive mechanisms modulating nociception. An improved understanding of the origins of pain should facilitate the development of novel strategies for its more effective treatment.

Temporal and intensity coding of pain in human cortex

Temporal and intensity coding of pain in human cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 80:3312-3320, 1998. We used a high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technique in healthy right-handed volunteers to demonstrate cortical areas displaying changes of activity significantly related to the time profile of the perceived intensity of experimental somatic pain over the course of several minutes. Twenty-four subjects (ascorbic acid group) received a subcutaneous injection of a dilute ascorbic acid solution into the dorsum of one foot, inducing prolonged burning pain (peak pain intensity on a 0-100 scale: 48 +/- 3, mean +/- SE; duration: 11.9 +/- 0.8 min). fMRI data sets were continuously acquired for approximately 20 min, beginning 5 min before and lasting 15 min after the onset of stimulation, from two sagittal planes on the medial hemispheric wall contralateral to the stimulated site, including the cingulate cortex and the putative foot representation area of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI). Neural clusters whose fMRI signal time courses were positively or negatively correlated (P < 0.0005) with the individual pain intensity curve were identified by cross-correlation statistics in all 24 volunteers. The spatial extent of the identified clusters was linearly related (P < 0.0001) to peak pain intensity. Regional analyses showed that positively correlated clusters were present in the majority of subjects in SI, cingulate, motor, and premotor cortex. Negative correlations were found predominantly in medial parietal, perigenual cingulate, and medial prefrontal regions. To test whether these neural changes were due to aspecific arousal or emotional reactions, related either to anticipation or presence of pain, fMRI experiments were performed with the same protocol in two additional groups of volunteers, subjected either to subcutaneous saline injection (saline: n = 16), inducing mild short-lasting pain (peak pain intensity 23 +/- 4; duration 2.8 +/- 0.6 min) or to nonnoxious mechanical stimulation of the skin (controls: n = 16) at the same body site. Subjects did not know in advance which stimulus would occur. The spatial extent of neural clusters whose signal time courses were positively or negatively correlated with the mean pain intensity curve of subjects injected with ascorbic acid was significantly larger (P < 0.001) in the ascorbic acid group than both saline and controls, suggesting that the observed responses were specifically related to pain intensity and duration. These findings reveal distributed cortical systems, including parietal areas as well as cingulate and frontal regions, involved in dynamic encoding of pain intensity over time, a process of great biological and clinical relevance.

Neurophysiological evaluation of pain

Neurophysiological techniques for the evaluation of pain in humans have made important advances in the last decade. A number of features of neuroanatomy and physiology of nociception qualifies pain as a multidimensional phenomenon which is rather unique among the sensory systems and which poses a number of technical and procedural requirements for its appropriate diagnostic assessment. Various stimulation techniques to induce defined pain in humans and used in combination with the methodology of evoked electrical brain potentials and magnetic fields are presented. Most recent knowledge gathered from scalp topography and dipole source analysis of pain-relevant evoked potentials and fields is discussed. Particular emphasis is put upon laser-evoked potentials and their application for diagnosis, pathophysiological description and monitoring of patients with neurological disorders and abnormal pain states. Future perspectives in this growing field of research are discussed briefly.

Painful stimuli evoke potentials recorded from the parasylvian cortex in humans

Cutaneous stimulation of the face and hand with a CO2 laser in three awake patients evoked potentials (LEPs) recorded from the dominant left parasylvian cortex. These were recorded by means of a subdural grid of electrodes implanted for evaluation of epilepsy. Stimulation of the contralateral face resulted in waveforms consisting of a negative potential (N2, 162 +/- 5 ms; mean +/- SE) followed by a positive potential (P2, 340 +/- 18 ms). Both waves occurred at longer latency after hand than after facial stimulation. N2 and P2 potentials recorded from the grid correspond well in morphology to those recorded from the scalp in four additional patients tested with the same stimulation paradigm. The N2 waves recorded from the subdural grid occurred at significantly shorter latencies than did those recorded from the scalp (184 +/- 6 ms), but the P2 waves at the grid occurred at significantly longer latencies than did those recorded at the scalp (281 +/- 13 ms). The amplitudes of the potentials recorded from the grid were maximal over the parietal operculum both for contralateral stimulation of the face or hand and for ipsilateral stimulation of the face. Potentials also were recorded in this area after stimulation of the ipsilateral hand. The cortical distributions of these potentials suggest that their generators are located in the parietal operculum or in the insula, or in both, consistent with previous PET, magnetoencephalographic, and scalp LEP source analyses. These previous analyses provide indirect evidence of nociceptive input to parasylvian cortex because the interpretation of each analysis incorporates multiple assumptions. The present results are the first direct evidence of nociceptive input to the human parasylvian cortex.

Very late pain-related activity identified with topographically mapped frequency domain analysis of evoked potentials

OBJECTIVE

To identify low-frequency activity in the pain-evoked potential at very late latencies, consistent with C-fiber transmission velocities.

METHODS

Brief (1 ms) painful (intracutaneous) and two levels of non-painful (mild and strong) electrical pulses were applied to the index and middle fingers of the left hand. Evoked potentials (EPs) were recorded from 30 electrodes covering the entire scalp. Data from the 3 stimulus conditions (approximately 60 trials per condition per subject) were compared using the frequency domain technique of complex demodulation applied to single trial data. Subjects were 14 normal right-handed male human volunteers, aged 19-36 years.

RESULTS

Using descriptive probability mapping, pain versus strong non-pain differences were found in grand average data as well as in 8 of 14 subjects, consisting of greater low-frequency power at latencies from 700 to 1100 ms at electrodes near the contralateral central sulcus and at the vertex.

CONCLUSIONS

There are topographically focal, pain versus non-pain differences in the 700-1100 ms latency range that can be seen using frequency-domain analytic techniques. These differences were not seen with traditional time domain analyses. They may be due to a C-fiber-related mechanism or to very late activity triggered by faster fibers.

Behavioral outcome of posterior parietal cortex injury in the monkey

Recent studies from our laboratory have characterized the response properties of trigeminal nociceptive neurons located in the posterior parietal cortex of awake monkeys, particularly in the rostral portion of the inferior parietal lobule and parietal operculum within the lateral sulcus. The stimulus intensity-response functions of some nociceptive neurons were significantly correlated to the stimulus intensity-escape frequency functions. The present study provides evidence that trauma to the posterior parietal cortex alters pain sensibility to the contralateral face. Although thermal pain tolerance was dramatically altered, the discriminative aspect of thermosensitivity may have remained intact. Our results complement the recent findings of clinical studies concerned with pain and damage to the posterior parietal cortex and of experimental studies concerned with painful stimulation and changes in regional cerebral blood flow. The role of the posterior parietal cortex in nociception and pain is discussed in relation to the first somatosensory area and to unilateral spatial neglect (inattention).

Nociceptive C fibre input to the primary somatosensory cortex (SI). A field potential study in the rat

In the present study, noxious thermal stimulation of the skin with short pulses of CO2-laser radiation was used to identify a cutaneous nociceptive C fibre input to SI and investigate the organization of this input in halothane-nitrous oxide anaesthetized rats. Noxious CO2-laser stimulation of the glabrous skin of the hindpaw consistently evoked late surface positive field potentials in SI (average onset latency 226 ms, peak latency 296 ms). It was demonstrated that these late potentials were evoked by an input from nociceptive C fibres, using a combination of latency measurements, anodal block of A fibre conduction and graded intensities of stimulation. Compared to the tactile evoked potentials in SI, the nociceptive C fibre evoked potentials were more widespread and exhibited a crude somatotopical organization. Intracortically, both tactile and nociceptive C fibre evoked potentials reversed polarity and exhibited a peak negativity in laminae III-IV. The nociceptive C fibre evoked potentials exhibited an additional peak negativity in laminae V-VI. The latter potential had a different time course as compared to the nociceptive C fibre potential evoked in laminae III-IV. In conclusion, an input from cutaneous nociceptive C fibres to SI was demonstrated for the first time in animal experiments. The input to SI from tactile receptors and cutaneous C nociceptors were differently organized.