1
|
Highmore CJ, Melaugh G, Morris RJ, Parker J, Direito SOL, Romero M, Soukarieh F, Robertson SN, Bamford NC. Translational challenges and opportunities in biofilm science: a BRIEF for the future. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2022; 8:68. [PMID: 36038607 PMCID: PMC9424220 DOI: 10.1038/s41522-022-00327-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Biofilms are increasingly recognised as a critical global issue in a multitude of industries impacting health, food and water security, marine sector, and industrial processes resulting in estimated economic cost of $5 trillion USD annually. A major barrier to the translation of biofilm science is the gap between industrial practices and academic research across the biofilms field. Therefore, there is an urgent need for biofilm research to notice and react to industrially relevant issues to achieve transferable outputs. Regulatory frameworks necessarily bridge gaps between different players, but require a clear, science-driven non-biased underpinning to successfully translate research. Here we introduce a 2-dimensional framework, termed the Biofilm Research-Industrial Engagement Framework (BRIEF) for classifying existing biofilm technologies according to their level of scientific insight, including the understanding of the underlying biofilm system, and their industrial utility accounting for current industrial practices. We evidence the BRIEF with three case studies of biofilm science across healthcare, food & agriculture, and wastewater sectors highlighting the multifaceted issues around the effective translation of biofilm research. Based on these studies, we introduce some advisory guidelines to enhance the translational impact of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C J Highmore
- NBIC Interdisciplinary Research Fellows, UK National Biofilms Innovation Centre (NBIC), Southampton, UK.,School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, Southampton, UK
| | - G Melaugh
- NBIC Interdisciplinary Research Fellows, UK National Biofilms Innovation Centre (NBIC), Southampton, UK.,School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK.,School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK
| | - R J Morris
- NBIC Interdisciplinary Research Fellows, UK National Biofilms Innovation Centre (NBIC), Southampton, UK.,School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK
| | - J Parker
- NBIC Interdisciplinary Research Fellows, UK National Biofilms Innovation Centre (NBIC), Southampton, UK.,School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, Southampton, UK
| | - S O L Direito
- NBIC Interdisciplinary Research Fellows, UK National Biofilms Innovation Centre (NBIC), Southampton, UK.,School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FD, UK
| | - M Romero
- NBIC Interdisciplinary Research Fellows, UK National Biofilms Innovation Centre (NBIC), Southampton, UK.,Biodiscovery Institute, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, Nottingham, UK
| | - F Soukarieh
- NBIC Interdisciplinary Research Fellows, UK National Biofilms Innovation Centre (NBIC), Southampton, UK.,Biodiscovery Institute, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, Nottingham, UK
| | - S N Robertson
- NBIC Interdisciplinary Research Fellows, UK National Biofilms Innovation Centre (NBIC), Southampton, UK. .,Biodiscovery Institute, School of Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, Nottingham, UK.
| | - N C Bamford
- NBIC Interdisciplinary Research Fellows, UK National Biofilms Innovation Centre (NBIC), Southampton, UK. .,Division of Molecular Microbiology, School of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 5EH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li K, Guan W, He P, Li K. Comparison of bacterial communities on the surface of concrete breakwater structures and ambient bacterioplankton. Lett Appl Microbiol 2022; 75:1193-1202. [PMID: 35831926 DOI: 10.1111/lam.13787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Breakwater structures made of concrete are used widely around the world, and the bacteria living on these surfaces can cause the concrete to deteriorate. In this study, we collected bacterial biofilms from concrete breakwater structures located along the coast of an island, a mainland coast, and a freshwater riverbank as well as planktonic water samples from each site, and we analyzed their bacterial community structures using Illumina sequencing. At the phylum level, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria dominated planktonic samples, whereas Cyanobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Bacteroidetes dominated the biofilm samples. High Cyanobacteria abundance was found in all biofilm samples. Bacterial communities significantly varied between planktonic and biofilm samples and between biofilm samples from seawater and freshwater. Only a small number of bacterial operational taxonomic units were shared by planktonic and biofilm samples from each sampling site. The permanganate index in ambient water had a more significant impact on biofilm bacterial communities than on planktonic samples. Additionally, ammonia nitrogen and total nitrogen contents were positively correlated and salinity was negatively correlated with bacterial beta diversity in biofilm samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kui Li
- College of Marine Ecology and Environment, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China
| | - Weibing Guan
- College of Marine Ecology and Environment, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China
| | - Peimin He
- College of Marine Ecology and Environment, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China
| | - Kejun Li
- College of Marine Ecology and Environment, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Concrete is an extreme but common environment and is home to microbial communities adapted to alkaline, saline, and oligotrophic conditions. Microbes inside the concrete that makes up buildings or roads have received little attention despite their ubiquity and capacity to interact with the concrete. Because concrete is a composite of materials which have their own microbial communities, we hypothesized that the microbial communities of concrete reflect those of the concrete components and that these communities change as the concrete ages. Here, we used a 16S amplicon study to show how microbial communities change over 2 years of outdoor weathering in two sets of concrete cylinders, one prone to the concrete-degrading alkali-silica reaction (ASR) and the other having the risk of the ASR mitigated. After identifying and removing taxa that were likely laboratory or reagent contaminants, we found that precursor materials, particularly the large aggregate (gravel), were the probable source of ∼50 to 60% of the bacteria observed in the first cylinders from each series. Overall, community diversity decreased over 2 years, with temporarily increased diversity in warmer summer months. We found that most of the concrete microbiome was composed of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria, although community composition changed seasonally and over multiyear time scales and was likely influenced by environmental deposition. Although the community composition between the two series was not significantly different overall, several taxa, including Arcobacter, Modestobacter, Salinicoccus, Rheinheimera, Lawsonella, and Bryobacter, appear to be associated with ASR. IMPORTANCE Concrete is the most-used building material in the world and a biologically extreme environment, with a microbiome composed of bacteria that likely come from concrete precursor materials, aerosols, and environmental deposition. These microbes, though seeded from a variety of materials, are all subject to desiccation, heating, starvation, high salinity, and very high pH. Microbes that survive and even thrive under these conditions can potentially either degrade concrete or contribute to its repair. Thus, understanding which microbes survive in concrete, under what conditions, and for how long has potential implications for biorepair of concrete. Further, methodological pipelines for analyzing concrete microbial communities can be applied to concrete from a variety of structures or with different types of damage to identify bioindicator species that can be used for structural health monitoring and service life prediction.
Collapse
|