Telomeres and NextGen CO-FISH: Directional Genomic Hybridization (Telo-dGH™)

Monitoring Genomic Structural Rearrangements Resulting from Gene Editing

The cytogenomics-based methodology of directional genomic hybridization (dGH) enables the detection and quantification of a more comprehensive spectrum of genomic structural variants than any other approach currently available, and importantly, does so on a single-cell basis. Thus, dGH is well-suited for testing and/or validating new advancements in CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing systems. In addition to aberrations detected by traditional cytogenetic approaches, the strand specificity of dGH facilitates detection of otherwise cryptic intra-chromosomal rearrangements, specifically small inversions. As such, dGH represents a powerful, high-resolution approach for the quantitative monitoring of potentially detrimental genomic structural rearrangements resulting from exposure to agents that induce DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), including restriction endonucleases and ionizing radiations. For intentional genome editing strategies, it is critical that any undesired effects of DSBs induced either by the editing system itself or by mis-repair with other endogenous DSBs are recognized and minimized. In this paper, we discuss the application of dGH for assessing gene editing-associated structural variants and the potential heterogeneity of such rearrangements among cells within an edited population, highlighting its relevance to personalized medicine strategies.

Elevated retrotransposon activity and genomic instability in primed pluripotent stem cells

BACKGROUND

Naïve and primed pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) represent two different pluripotent states. Primed PSCs following in vitro culture exhibit lower developmental potency as evidenced by failure in germline chimera assays, unlike mouse naïve PSCs. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the lower developmental competency of primed PSCs remain elusive.

RESULTS

We examine the regulation of telomere maintenance, retrotransposon activity, and genomic stability of primed PSCs and compare them with naïve PSCs. Surprisingly, primed PSCs only minimally maintain telomeres and show fragile telomeres, associated with declined DNA recombination and repair activity, in contrast to naïve PSCs that robustly elongate telomeres. Also, we identify LINE1 family integrant L1Md_T as naïve-specific retrotransposon and ERVK family integrant IAPEz to define primed PSCs, and their transcription is differentially regulated by heterochromatic histones and Dnmt3b. Notably, genomic instability of primed PSCs is increased, in association with aberrant retrotransposon activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that fragile telomere, retrotransposon-associated genomic instability, and declined DNA recombination repair, together with reduced function of cell cycle and mitochondria, increased apoptosis, and differentiation properties may link to compromised developmental potency of primed PSCs, noticeably distinguishable from naïve PSCs.