Personalized Neo-Epitope Vaccines for Cancer Treatment

Instigation of the epoch of nanovaccines in cancer immunotherapy

Cancer is an unprecedented proliferation of cells leading to abnormalities in differentiation and maturation. Treatment of primary and metastatic cancer is challenging. In addition to surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapies have been conventionally used; however, they suffer from severe toxicity and non-specificity. Immunotherapy, the science of programming the body's own defense system against cancer has gained tremendous attention in the last few decades. However, partial immunogenic stimulation, premature degradation and inability to activate dendritic and helper T cells has resulted in limited clinical success. The era of nanomedicine has brought about several breakthroughs in various pharmaceutical and biomedical fields. Hereby, we review and discuss the interplay of tumor microenvironment (TME) and the immunological cascade and how they can be employed to develop nanoparticle-based cancer vaccines and immunotherapies. Nanoparticles composed of lipids, polymers and inorganic materials contain useful properties suitable for vaccine development. Proteinaceous vaccines derived from mammalian viruses, bacteriophages and plant viruses also have unique advantages due to their immunomodulation capabilities. This review accounts for all such considerations. Additionally, we explore how attributes of nanotechnology can be utilized to develop successful nanomedicine-based vaccines for cancer therapy. This article is categorized under: Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Nanoscale Systems in Biology Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.

A Protease Activatable Interleukin-2 Fusion Protein Engenders Antitumor Immune Responses by Interferon Gamma-Dependent and Interferon Gamma-Independent Mechanisms

Cytokines are powerful mediators of immune responses and some, such as interleukin-2 (IL-2), have achieved dramatic responses as cancer immunotherapies. Unfortunately, systemic administration often results in deleterious side effects, prompting exploration of strategies to localize cytokine activity to the tumor microenvironment (TME). To this end, we constructed an IL-2/IL2Ra fusion protein (IL-2FP) with an MMP2/9-specific cleavage site, designed to exploit the dysregulated protease activity in the TME to selectively activate IL-2 in the tumor. To determine if TME protease activity is sufficient to cleave the FP and if FP activity is due to specific cleavage, we created Colon 38 tumor cell lines expressing similar levels of IL-2FPs with either a functional cleavage site [H11(cs-1FP)] or a scrambled, noncleavable sequence [H2(scramFP)]. H11(cs-1FP) tumors demonstrated reduced tumor growth, characterized by regressions not observed in H2(scramFP) tumors. Analysis through qRT-PCR, flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry indicate robust CD8 responses in the H11(cs-1FP) tumors. Interferon gamma (IFNg) knockout mice revealed that the immune effects of the cleavable FP are mediated through both IFNg-dependent and IFNg-independent mechanisms. Collectively, these data suggest that matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in the TME can cleave the IL-2FP specifically, thus enhancing an antitumor response, and provide a rationale for further developing this approach.

The immunological characteristics of gallbladder carcinoma and advances in immunotherapy practices

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is one of the most common malignant tumors in the biliary system, ranking sixth among gastrointestinal malignancies. In addition, the incidence of GBC has recently increased in China. GBC metastasizes early and invades adjacent organs such as the liver, making patients with GBC ineligible for radical surgery and giving them a poor prognosis. What is more, GBC is more inclined to develop chemo-resistance, which requires new strategies for clinical intervention. Cancer immunotherapy has made great advances over the past few years, with improved clinical efficacy against multiple malignancies, including GBC. This review summarizes the immunological characteristics of GBC as well as current advances in immunotherapies for GBC in order to provide new insights into future treatment and prevention of GBC.

Point mutation screening of tumor neoantigens and peptide-induced specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes using The Cancer Genome Atlas database

The aim of the present study was to use The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to identify tumor neoantigens, combined with a bioinformatics analysis to design and analyze antigen epitope peptides. Epitopes were screened using immunogenicity tests to identify the ideal epitope peptides to target tumor neoantigens, which can specifically activate the immune response of T cells. The high-frequency mutation loci (top 10) of colorectal, lung and liver cancer genes were screened using TCGA database. The antigenic epitope peptides with high affinity for major histocompatibility complex molecules were selected and synthesized using computer prediction algorithms, and were subsequently detected using flow cytometry. The cytotoxicity of specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) on peptide-loaded T2 cells was initially verified using interferon IFN-γ detection and a calcein-acetoxymethyl (Cal-AM) release assay. Tumor cell lines expressing point mutations in KRAS, TP53 and CTNNB1 genes were constructed respectively, and the cytotoxicity of peptide-induced specific CTLs on wild-type and mutant tumor cells was verified using a Cal-AM release assay and carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester-propidium iodide staining. The high-frequency gene mutation loci of KRAS proto-oncogene (KRAS) G12V, tumor protein p53 (TP53) R158L and catenin β1 (CTNNB1) K335I were identified in TCGA database. A total of 3 groups of wild-type and mutant peptides were screened using a peptide prediction algorithm. The CTNNB1 group had a strong affinity for the human leukocyte antigen-A2 molecule, as determined using flow cytometry. The IFN-γ secretion of specific CTLs in the CTNNB1 group was the highest, followed by the TP53 and the KRAS groups. The killing rate of mutant peptide-induced specific CTLs on peptide-loaded T2 cells in the CTNNB1 group was higher compared with that observed in the other groups. The killing rate of specific CTLs induced by mutant peptides present on tumor cells was higher compared with that induced by wild-type peptides. However, when compared with the TP53 and KRAS groups, specific CTLs induced by mutant peptides in the CTNNB1 group had more potent cytotoxicity towards mutant and wild-type tumor cells. In conclusion, point mutant tumor neoantigens screened in the three groups improved the cytotoxicity of specific T cells, and the mutant peptides in the CTNNB1 group were more prominent, indicating that they may activate the cellular immune response more readily.

Nano-Enhanced Cancer Immunotherapy: Immunology Encounters Nanotechnology

Cancer immunotherapy utilizes the immune system to fight cancer and has already moved from the laboratory to clinical application. However, and despite excellent therapeutic outcomes in some hematological and solid cancers, the regular clinical use of cancer immunotherapies reveals major limitations. These include the lack of effective immune therapy options for some cancer types, unresponsiveness to treatment by many patients, evolving therapy resistance, the inaccessible and immunosuppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment (TME), and the risk of potentially life-threatening immune toxicities. Given the potential of nanotechnology to deliver, enhance, and fine-tune cancer immunotherapeutic agents, the combination of cancer immunotherapy with nanotechnology can overcome some of these limitations. In this review, we summarize innovative reports and novel strategies that successfully combine nanotechnology and cancer immunotherapy. We also provide insight into how nanoparticular combination therapies can be used to improve therapy responsiveness, to reduce unwanted toxicity, and to overcome adverse effects of the TME.

Gene Therapy in Cancer Treatment: Why Go Nano?

The proposal of gene therapy to tackle cancer development has been instrumental for the development of novel approaches and strategies to fight this disease, but the efficacy of the proposed strategies has still fallen short of delivering the full potential of gene therapy in the clinic. Despite the plethora of gene modulation approaches, e.g., gene silencing, antisense therapy, RNA interference, gene and genome editing, finding a way to efficiently deliver these effectors to the desired cell and tissue has been a challenge. Nanomedicine has put forward several innovative platforms to overcome this obstacle. Most of these platforms rely on the application of nanoscale structures, with particular focus on nanoparticles. Herein, we review the current trends on the use of nanoparticles designed for cancer gene therapy, including inorganic, organic, or biological (e.g., exosomes) variants, in clinical development and their progress towards clinical applications.