Mastery Learning: Origins, Features, and Evidence from the Health Professions

Prospective study on comparison of simulation-based mastery learning versus conventional apprentice-based learning for basic endoscopy training

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) method holds promise for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of endoscopy training. However, further study is required to establish its advantages over the traditional method. We aim to prospectively compare outcomes between gastrointestinal endoscopy trainees taught using SBML and those trained using conventional apprenticeship methods for upper endoscopy.

METHODS

We performed a blinded, stepwise, comparative study with SBML participants deliberately practicing deconstructed steps of upper endoscopy and apprenticeship participants observing procedures. Three blinded trainers assessed trainees' skills using a validated esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) tool pre-and post-training. The minimum pass standard (MPS) was set at a score > 2. We compared MPS of the groups using standard statistics and paired t-test.

RESULTS

Six trainees were enrolled in the SBML group, and six in the conventional group. All trainees in the SBML group passed the minimum standard compared with the conventional group (P = 0.06). All trainees in the SBML group obtained significantly higher scores in overall basic GI endoscopic skills, esophageal, stomach, and duodenal observation skills than those of the conventional apprenticeship group (P < 0.05). The SBML curriculum led to three times more learning (Cohen's d = 6.5) than the conventional method (Cohen's d = 1.8).

CONCLUSION

This prospective study supports SBML for upper endoscopy training compared with the traditional apprentice-based method. SBML resulted in a steeper learning curve, as trainees learned three times more during the same period. Furthermore, trainees developed a uniform competency level at the end of training.

Simulation-based Mastery Learning Improves Critical Care Skills of Advanced Practice Providers

Background

Advanced practice providers (APPs) are essential members of intensive care unit (ICU) interprofessional teams and are expected to be competent in performing procedures. There are no published criteria for establishing when APPs can independently perform procedures. Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) is an effective strategy for improving critical care skills but has not been applied to practicing ICU APPs.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to evaluate if an SBML curriculum could improve the critical care skills and procedural self-confidence of ICU APPs.

Methods

We performed a pretest-posttest study of central venous catheter (CVC) insertion, thoracentesis, and mechanical ventilation (MV) management skills among ICU APPs who participated in an SBML course at an academic hospital. For each skill, APPs underwent baseline skills assessments (pretests) on a simulator using previously published checklists, followed by didactic sessions and deliberate practice with individualized feedback. Within 2 weeks, participants were required to meet or exceed previously established minimum passing standards (MPS) on simulated skills assessments (posttests) using the same checklists. Further deliberate practice was provided for those unable to meet the MPS until they retested and met this standard. We compared pretest to posttest skills checklist scores and procedural confidence.

Results

All 12 eligible ICU APPs participated in internal jugular CVC, subclavian CVC, and MV training. Five APPs participated in thoracentesis training. At baseline, no APPs met the MPS on all skills. At training completion, all APPs achieved the mastery standard. Internal jugular CVC pretest performance improved from a mean of 67.2% (standard deviation [SD], 28.8%) items correct to 97.1% (SD, 3.8%) at posttest (P = 0.005). Subclavian CVC pretest performance improved from 29.2% (SD, 32.7%) items correct to 93.1% (SD 3.9%) at posttest (P < 0.001). Thoracentesis pretest skill improved from 63.9% (SD, 30.6%) items correct to 99.2% (SD, 1.7%) at posttest (P = 0.054). Pretest MV skills improved from 54.8% (SD, 19.7%) items correct to 92.3% (SD, 5.0%) at posttest (P < 0.001). APP procedural confidence improved for each skill from pre to posttest.

Conclusion

SBML is effective for training APPs to perform ICU skills. Relying on traditional educational methods does not reliably ensure that APPs are adequately prepared to perform skills such as CVC insertion, thoracentesis, and MV management.

Improving performance and self‐efficacy of novice nurses using hybrid simulation‐based mastery learning

AIM

Acute chest pain is a commonly encountered symptom in hospital medical/surgical units; however, almost half of nurses in their second year of clinical experience in our facility have reported struggling to care for acute chest pain patients. We developed, implemented, and examined the effectiveness of a simulation-based, mastery learning clinical nursing educational program to improve self-efficacy and performance in caring for patients with acute chest pain.

METHODS

The study adopted a single-site, single-cohort design using simulation-based performance assessment and self-efficacy surveys on a convenience sample of 37 second-year clinical nurse participants in multi-stage hybrid mastery learning educational intervention using asynchronous e-learning, and hands-on simulation training and assessment with feedback on caring for chest pain patients. Performance assessments and self-efficacy surveys were administered pre-, post-, and 5 months post-intervention.

RESULTS

Clinical performance on the post- and 5 months follow-up assessments were significantly higher than those for the pre-test (P < .0001). The self-efficacy scores for the post- and the 5 months follow-up assessments were significantly higher than the pre-course scores (P < .0001). Participants' self-efficacy perceptions were positively correlated with their performances at 5 months post-intervention.

CONCLUSION

Performance and self-efficacy of novice nurses in caring for acute chest pain patients improved significantly with the multi-stage hybrid mastery learning educational intervention, with improvements retained 5 months post-intervention. The results suggest the applicability of simulation-based mastery learning in a clinical setting for novice nurses to attain specific skills, and raise their self-perception of competence to care for patients in acute settings.

Simulation-based mastery learning in gastrointestinal endoscopy training

Simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) is an emerging form of competency-based training that has been proposed as the next standard method for procedural task training, including that in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Current basic gastrointestinal endoscopy training relies on the number of procedures performed, and it has been criticized for its lack of objective standards that result in variable skills among trainees and its association with patient safety risk. Thus, incorporating simulators into a competency-based curriculum seems ideal for gastrointestinal endoscopy training. The curriculum for SBML in gastrointestinal endoscopy is currently being developed and has promising potential to translate into the clinical performance. Unlike the present apprenticeship model of “see one, do one, teach one,” SBML integrates a competency-based curriculum with specific learning objectives alongside simulation-based training. This allows trainees to practice essential skills repeatedly, receive feedback from experts, and gradually develop their abilities to achieve mastery. Moreover, trainees and trainers need to understand the learning targets of the program so that trainees can focus their learning on the necessary skills and trainers can provide structured feedback based on the expected outcomes. In addition to learning targets, an assessment plan is essential to provide trainees with future directions for their improvement and ensure patient safety by issuing a passing standard. Finally, the SBML program should be planned and managed by a specific team and conducted within a developed and tested curriculum. This review discusses the current state of gastrointestinal endoscopy training and the role of SBML in that field.

Simulation in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a scoping review

Since the origins of surgery, simulation has played an important role in surgical education, particularly in plastic and reconstructive surgery. This has greater relevance in contemporary settings of reduced clinical exposure resulting in limited work-based learning opportunities. With changing surgical curricula, it is prescient to examine the role of simulation in plastic and reconstructive surgery.

A scoping review protocol was used to identify relevant studies, with an iterative process identifying, reviewing and charting the data to derive reported outcomes and themes.

Of the 554 studies identified, 52 studies were included in this review. The themes identified included simulator modalities, curriculum elements targeted and relevant surgical competencies. There was a predominance of synthetically based simulators, targeting technical skills largely associated with microsurgery, paediatric surgery and craniomaxillofacial surgery.

Existing simulators largely address high-complexity procedures. There are multiple under-represented areas, including low-complexity procedures and simulation activities addressing communication, collaboration, management and leadership. There are many opportunities for simulation in surgical education, which requires a contextual appreciation of educational theory. Simulation may be used both as a learning method and as an assessment tool.

This review describes the literature relating to simulation in plastic and reconstructive surgery and proposes opportunities for incorporating simulation in a broader sense, in the surgical curriculum.

Oral health clinical training and dental referral program for nurses: An interprofessional collaborative project

INTRODUCTION

The overall objective of this study was to establish an interprofessional oral health training program for nursing personnel at Oregon Health & Science University.

METHODS

Fifteen registered nurses participated in didactic and clinical training and screened the oral health of patients. Nurses completed confidence assessments and patients completed satisfaction surveys. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests for comparisons of mean scores.

RESULTS

Pre- and post-training surveys demonstrated significant increases in nurses' knowledge, confidence in discussing dental problems, performing dental screenings, and referring patients to dentists (p < 0.05). Patient satisfaction surveys (n = 89) denoted satisfaction with oral screenings and willingness for nurses to perform them.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses participating in oral health and clinical screening training programs supervised by dentists significantly increased their confidence in providing dental referrals. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine the impact of such training programs on patient health.