Progression Free Survival Prediction for Head and Neck Cancer Using Deep Learning Based on Clinical and PET/CT Imaging Data

Segmentation-Free Outcome Prediction from Head and Neck Cancer PET/CT Images: Deep Learning-Based Feature Extraction from Multi-Angle Maximum Intensity Projections (MA-MIPs)

We introduce an innovative, simple, effective segmentation-free approach for survival analysis of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients from PET/CT images. By harnessing deep learning-based feature extraction techniques and multi-angle maximum intensity projections (MA-MIPs) applied to Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) images, our proposed method eliminates the need for manual segmentations of regions-of-interest (ROIs) such as primary tumors and involved lymph nodes. Instead, a state-of-the-art object detection model is trained utilizing the CT images to perform automatic cropping of the head and neck anatomical area, instead of only the lesions or involved lymph nodes on the PET volumes. A pre-trained deep convolutional neural network backbone is then utilized to extract deep features from MA-MIPs obtained from 72 multi-angel axial rotations of the cropped PET volumes. These deep features extracted from multiple projection views of the PET volumes are then aggregated and fused, and employed to perform recurrence-free survival analysis on a cohort of 489 HNC patients. The proposed approach outperforms the best performing method on the target dataset for the task of recurrence-free survival analysis. By circumventing the manual delineation of the malignancies on the FDG PET-CT images, our approach eliminates the dependency on subjective interpretations and highly enhances the reproducibility of the proposed survival analysis method. The code for this work is publicly released.

Automatic Head and Neck Tumor segmentation and outcome prediction relying on FDG-PET/CT images: Findings from the second edition of the HECKTOR challenge

By focusing on metabolic and morphological tissue properties respectively, FluoroDeoxyGlucose (FDG)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) modalities include complementary and synergistic information for cancerous lesion delineation and characterization (e.g. for outcome prediction), in addition to usual clinical variables. This is especially true in Head and Neck Cancer (HNC). The goal of the HEad and neCK TumOR segmentation and outcome prediction (HECKTOR) challenge was to develop and compare modern image analysis methods to best extract and leverage this information automatically. We present here the post-analysis of HECKTOR 2nd edition, at the 24th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2021. The scope of the challenge was substantially expanded compared to the first edition, by providing a larger population (adding patients from a new clinical center) and proposing an additional task to the challengers, namely the prediction of Progression-Free Survival (PFS). To this end, the participants were given access to a training set of 224 cases from 5 different centers, each with a pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT scan and clinical variables. Their methods were subsequently evaluated on a held-out test set of 101 cases from two centers. For the segmentation task (Task 1), the ranking was based on a Borda counting of their ranks according to two metrics: mean Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and median Hausdorff Distance at 95th percentile (HD95). For the PFS prediction task, challengers could use the tumor contours provided by experts (Task 3) or rely on their own (Task 2). The ranking was obtained according to the Concordance index (C-index) calculated on the predicted risk scores. A total of 103 teams registered for the challenge, for a total of 448 submissions and 29 papers. The best method in the segmentation task obtained an average DSC of 0.759, and the best predictions of PFS obtained a C-index of 0.717 (without relying on the provided contours) and 0.698 (using the expert contours). An interesting finding was that best PFS predictions were reached by relying on DL approaches (with or without explicit tumor segmentation, 4 out of the 5 best ranked) compared to standard radiomics methods using handcrafted features extracted from delineated tumors, and by exploiting alternative tumor contours (automated and/or larger volumes encompassing surrounding tissues) rather than relying on the expert contours. This second edition of the challenge confirmed the promising performance of fully automated primary tumor delineation in PET/CT images of HNC patients, although there is still a margin for improvement in some difficult cases. For the first time, the prediction of outcome was also addressed and the best methods reached relatively good performance (C-index above 0.7). Both results constitute another step forward toward large-scale outcome prediction studies in HNC.

Radiomics prognostic analysis of PET/CT images in a multicenter head and neck cancer cohort: investigating ComBat strategies, sub-volume characterization, and automatic segmentation

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the impact of several ComBat harmonization strategies, intra-tumoral sub-volume characterization, and automatic segmentations for progression-free survival (PFS) prediction through radiomics modeling for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) in PET/CT images.

METHODS

The HECKTOR MICCAI 2021 challenge set containing PET/CT images and clinical data of 325 oropharynx HNC patients was exploited. A total of 346 IBSI-compliant radiomic features were extracted for each patient's primary tumor volume defined by the reference manual contours. Modeling relied on least absolute shrinkage Cox regression (Lasso-Cox) for feature selection (FS) and Cox proportional-hazards (CoxPH) models were built to predict PFS. Within this methodological framework, 8 different strategies for ComBat harmonization were compared, including before or after FS, in feature groups separately or all features directly, and with center or clustering-determined labels. Features extracted from tumor sub-volume clustering were also investigated for their prognostic additional value. Finally, 3 automatic segmentations (2 threshold-based and a 3D U-Net) were also compared. All results were evaluated with the concordance index (C-index).

RESULTS

Radiomics features without harmonization, combined with clinical factors, led to models with C-index values of 0.69 in the testing set. The best version of ComBat harmonization, i.e., after FS, for feature groups separately and relying on clustering-determined labels, achieved a C-index of 0.71. The use of features extracted from tumor sub-volumes further improved the C-index to 0.72. Models that relied on the automatic segmentations yielded close but slightly lower prognostic performance (0.67-0.70) compared to reference contours.

CONCLUSION

A standard radiomics pipeline allowed for prediction of PFS in a multicenter HNC cohort. Applying a specific strategy of ComBat harmonization improved the performance. The extraction of intra-tumoral sub-volume features and automatic segmentation could contribute to the improvement and automation of prognosis modeling, respectively.

Deep-learning-based generation of synthetic 6-minute MRI from 2-minute MRI for use in head and neck cancer radiotherapy

Background

Quick magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans with low contrast-to-noise ratio are typically acquired for daily MRI-guided radiotherapy setup. However, for patients with head and neck (HN) cancer, these images are often insufficient for discriminating target volumes and organs at risk (OARs). In this study, we investigated a deep learning (DL) approach to generate high-quality synthetic images from low-quality images.

Methods

We used 108 unique HN image sets of paired 2-minute T2-weighted scans (2mMRI) and 6-minute T2-weighted scans (6mMRI). 90 image sets (~20,000 slices) were used to train a 2-dimensional generative adversarial DL model that utilized 2mMRI as input and 6mMRI as output. Eighteen image sets were used to test model performance. Similarity metrics, including the mean squared error (MSE), structural similarity index (SSIM), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) were calculated between normalized synthetic 6mMRI and ground-truth 6mMRI for all test cases. In addition, a previously trained OAR DL auto-segmentation model was used to segment the right parotid gland, left parotid gland, and mandible on all test case images. Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) were calculated between 2mMRI and either ground-truth 6mMRI or synthetic 6mMRI for each OAR; two one-sided t-tests were applied between the ground-truth and synthetic 6mMRI to determine equivalence. Finally, a visual Turing test using paired ground-truth and synthetic 6mMRI was performed using three clinician observers; the percentage of images that were correctly identified was compared to random chance using proportion equivalence tests.

Results

The median similarity metrics across the whole images were 0.19, 0.93, and 33.14 for MSE, SSIM, and PSNR, respectively. The median of DSCs comparing ground-truth vs. synthetic 6mMRI auto-segmented OARs were 0.86 vs. 0.85, 0.84 vs. 0.84, and 0.82 vs. 0.85 for the right parotid gland, left parotid gland, and mandible, respectively (equivalence p<0.05 for all OARs). The percent of images correctly identified was equivalent to chance (p<0.05 for all observers).

Conclusions

Using 2mMRI inputs, we demonstrate that DL-generated synthetic 6mMRI outputs have high similarity to ground-truth 6mMRI, but further improvements can be made. Our study facilitates the clinical incorporation of synthetic MRI in MRI-guided radiotherapy.

Artificial Intelligence for Radiation Oncology Applications Using Public Datasets

Artificial intelligence (AI) has exceptional potential to positively impact the field of radiation oncology. However, large curated datasets - often involving imaging data and corresponding annotations - are required to develop radiation oncology AI models. Importantly, the recent establishment of Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable (FAIR) principles for scientific data management have enabled an increasing number of radiation oncology related datasets to be disseminated through data repositories, thereby acting as a rich source of data for AI model building. This manuscript reviews the current and future state of radiation oncology data dissemination, with a particular emphasis on published imaging datasets, AI data challenges, and associated infrastructure. Moreover, we provide historical context of FAIR data dissemination protocols, difficulties in the current distribution of radiation oncology data, and recommendations regarding data dissemination for eventual utilization in AI models. Through FAIR principles and standardized approaches to data dissemination, radiation oncology AI research has nothing to lose and everything to gain.