Assessing the Neurological Outcome of Traumatic Acute Subdural Hematoma Patients with and without Primary Decompressive Craniectomies

Comparative efficacy of craniotomy versus craniectomy in surgical management of acute subdural hematoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH), a predominantly lethal neurosurgical emergency in the settings of traumatic brain injury, requires surgical evacuation of hematoma, via craniotomy or craniectomy. The clinical practices vary, with no consensus over the superiority of either procedure.

AIM

To evaluate whether craniotomy or craniectomy is the optimal approach for surgical evacuation of ASDH.

METHODS

After a comprehensive search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to January 2024, to identify relevant studies, a meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model, and risk ratios were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For quality assessment, the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were applied.

RESULTS

Out of 2143 potentially relevant studies, 1875 were deemed suitable for screening. Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review. Thirteen studies, in which 1589 patients underwent craniotomy and 1452 patients underwent craniectomy, allowed meta-analysis. Pooled estimates showed that there was no significant correlation of mortality at 6 months (RR 1.14;95 % CI; 0.94-1.38 P = 0.18) and 12 months (RR 1.17; 95 % CI; 0.84-1.63 P = 0.36) with the two surgical modalities. A positive association was observed between improved functional outcomes at 6-months and craniotomy (RR 0.76; 95 % CI; 0.62-0.93 P = 0.008), however, no significant difference was observed between the two treatment groups at 12 months follow-up (RR 0.89; 95 % CI; 0.72-1.09 P = 0.26). Craniotomy reported a significantly higher proportion of patients discharged to home (RR 0.63; 95 % CI; 0.49-0.83 P = 0.0007), whereas incidence of residual subdural hematoma was significantly lower in the craniectomy group (RR 0.70; 95 % CI; 0.52-0.94 P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Craniectomy is associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, with long-term follow-up, no difference in mortality and functional outcomes is observed in either of the patient populations. On account of equivocal evidence regarding the efficacy of craniectomy over craniotomy in the realm of long-term outcomes, utmost preference shall be directed toward craniotomy as it is less invasive and associated with fewer complications.

Surgical strategies in acute subdural hematoma: a meta-analysis of decompressive craniectomy vs. craniotomy

OBJECTIVE

Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) stands as a significant contributor to morbidity after severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI). The primary treatment approach for patients experiencing progressive neurological deficits or notable mass effects is the surgical removal of the hematoma, which can be achieved through craniotomy (CO) or decompressive craniectomy (DC). Nevertheless, the choice between these two procedures remains a subject of ongoing debate and controversy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature review, utilizing prominent online databases and manually searching references related to craniotomy and craniectomy for subdural hematoma evacuation up to November 2023. Our analysis focused on outcome variables such as the presence of residual subdural hematoma, the need for revision procedures, and overall clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

We included a total of 11 comparative studies in our analysis, encompassing 4269 patients, with 2979 undergoing craniotomy and 1290 undergoing craniectomy, meeting the inclusion criteria. Patients who underwent craniectomy displayed significantly lower scores on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) during their initial presentation. Following surgery, the DC group exhibited a significantly reduced rate of residual subdural (P = 0.009). Additionally, the likelihood of a poor outcome during follow-up was lower in the CO group. Likewise, the mortality rate was lower in the CO group compared to the craniectomy group (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41-0.98, I2 = 84%, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our study found that CO was associated with more favorable outcomes in terms of mortality, reoperation rate, and functional outcome while DC was associated with less likelihood of residual subdural hematoma. Upon further investigation of patient characteristics who underwent into either of these interventions, it was very clear that patients in DC cohort have more serious and low pre-op characteristics than the CO group. Nonetheless, brain herniation and advanced age act as independent factor for predicting the outcome irrespective of the intervention.

Prognostic Factors of Mortality and Functional Outcome for Acute Subdural Hematoma: A Review Article

Acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is the most frequent intracranial traumatic lesion requiring surgery in high-income countries. To date, uncertainty remains regarding the odds of mortality or functional outcome of patients with ASDH, regardless of whether they are operated on. This review aims to shed light on the clinical and radiologic factors associated with ASDH outcome. A scoping review was conducted on Medline database from inception to 2023. This review yielded 41 patient series. In the general population, specific clinical (admission Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS], abnormal pupil exam, time to surgery, decompressive craniectomy, raised postoperative intracranial pressure) and radiologic (ASDH thickness, midline shift, thickness/midline shift ratio, uncal herniation, and brain density difference) factors were associated with mortality (grade III). Other clinical (admission GCS, decompressive craniectomy) and radiologic (ASDH volume, thickness/midline shift ratio, uncal herniation, loss of basal cisterns, petechiae, and brain density difference) factors were associated with functional outcome (grade III). In the elderly, only postoperative GCS and midline shift on brain computed tomography were associated with mortality (grade III). Comorbidities, abnormal pupil examination, postoperative GCS, intensive care unit hospitalization, and midline shift were associated with functional outcome (grade III). Based on these factors, the SHE (Subdural Hematoma in the Elderly) and the RASH (Richmond Acute Subdural Hematoma) scores could be used in daily clinical practice. This review has underlined a few supplementary factors of prognostic interest in patients with ASDH, and highlighted two predictive scores that could be used in clinical practice to guide and assist clinicians in surgical indication.

Surgery for acute subdural hematoma: the value of pre-emptive decompressive craniectomy by propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute subdural hematomas (ASDH) are found frequently following traumatic brain injury (TBI) and they are considered the most lethal type of mass lesions. The decision to perform a procedure to evacuate ASDH and the approach, either via craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy (DC), remains controversial.

METHODS

We reviewed a prospectively collected series of 343 moderate to severe TBI patients in whom ASDH was the main lesion (ASDH volumes ≥10 cc). Patients with early comfort measures (early mortality prediction >50% and not ICP monitored), bilateral ASDH or the presence of another intracranial hematoma with volumes exceeding two times the volume of the ASDH were excluded. Among them, 112 were managed conservatively, 65 underwent ASDH evacuation by craniotomy and 166 by DC (103 pre-emptive DC, 63 obligatory DC). We calculated the average treatment effect by propensity score (PS) analysis using the following covariates: age, year, hypoxia, shock, pupils, major extracranial injury, motor score, midline shift, ASDH volume, swelling, intraventricular and subarachnoid hemorrhage presence. Then, multivariable binary regression and ordinal logistic regression analysis were performed to estimate associations between predictors and mortality and 12 months-GOS respectively. The patients' inverse probability weights were included as an independent variable in both regression models.

RESULTS

The main variables associated with outcome were year, age, falls from patient´s own height, hypoxia, early deterioration, pupillary abnormalities, basal cistern effacement, compliance to ICP monitoring guidelines and type of surgical approach (craniotomy and pre-emptive DC).

CONCLUSIONS

According to sliding dichotomy analysis, we found that patients in the intermediate or worst bands of unfavorable outcome prognosis seemed to achieve better than expected outcome if they underwent pre-emptive DC rather than craniotomy.

Primary Decompressive Craniectomy After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Literature Review

Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) still put a high burden on public health worldwide. Medical and surgical treatment strategies are continuously being studied, but the role and indications of primary decompressive craniectomy (DC) remain controversial. In medically refractory intracranial hypertension after severe traumatic brain injury, secondary decompressive craniectomy is a last resort treatment option to control intracranial pressure (ICP). Randomized controlled studies have been extensively performed on secondary decompressive craniectomy and its role in the management of severe traumatic brain injuries. Indications, prognostic factors, and long-term outcomes in primary decompressive craniectomy during the evacuation of an epidural, subdural, or intracerebral hematoma in the acute phase are still a matter of ongoing research and controversy to this day. Prospective trials have been designed, but the results are yet to be published. In isolated epidural hematoma without underlying brain injury, osteoplastic craniotomy is likely to be sufficient. In acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) with relevant brain swelling and preoperative CT signs such as effaced cisterns, overly proportional midline-shift compared to a relatively small acute subdural hematoma, and accompanying brain contusions as well as pupillary abnormalities, intraventricular hemorrhage, and coagulation disorder, primary decompressive craniectomy is more likely to be of benefit for patients with traumatic brain injury. The role of intracranial pressure monitoring after primary decompressive craniectomy is recommended, but prospective trials are pending. More refined guidelines and hopefully class I evidence will be established with the ongoing trials: randomized evaluation of surgery with craniectomy for patients undergoing evacuation of acute subdural hematoma (RESCUE-ASDH), prospective randomized evaluation of decompressive ipsilateral craniectomy for traumatic acute epidural hematoma (PREDICT-AEDH), and pragmatic explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS).

Traumatic Epidural and Subdural Hematoma: Epidemiology, Outcome, and Dating

Epidural hematomas (EDHs) and subdural hematomas (SDHs), or so-called extra-axial bleedings, are common clinical entities after a traumatic brain injury (TBI). A forensic pathologist often analyzes cases of traumatic EDHs or SDHs due to road accidents, suicides, homicides, assaults, domestic or on-the-job accidents, and even in a medical responsibility scenario. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the published data in the medical literature, useful to forensic pathologists. We mainly focused on the data from the last 15 years, and considered the most updated protocols and diagnostic-therapeutic tools. This study reviews the epidemiology, outcome, and dating of extra-axial hematomas in the adult population; studies on the controversial interdural hematoma are also included.

Consensus statement from the International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury : Consensus statement

BACKGROUND

Two randomised trials assessing the effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy (DC) following traumatic brain injury (TBI) were published in recent years: DECRA in 2011 and RESCUEicp in 2016. As the results have generated debate amongst clinicians and researchers working in the field of TBI worldwide, it was felt necessary to provide general guidance on the use of DC following TBI and identify areas of ongoing uncertainty via a consensus-based approach.

METHODS

The International Consensus Meeting on the Role of Decompressive Craniectomy in the Management of Traumatic Brain Injury took place in Cambridge, UK, on the 28th and 29th September 2017. The meeting was jointly organised by the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS), AO/Global Neuro and the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma. Discussions and voting were organised around six pre-specified themes: (1) primary DC for mass lesions, (2) secondary DC for intracranial hypertension, (3) peri-operative care, (4) surgical technique, (5) cranial reconstruction and (6) DC in low- and middle-income countries.

RESULTS

The invited participants discussed existing published evidence and proposed consensus statements. Statements required an agreement threshold of more than 70% by blinded voting for approval.

CONCLUSIONS

In this manuscript, we present the final consensus-based recommendations. We have also identified areas of uncertainty, where further research is required, including the role of primary DC, the role of hinge craniotomy and the optimal timing and material for skull reconstruction.

Predictable Values of Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with Acute Subdural Hematoma: Comparison between Decompressive Craniectomy after Craniotomy Group and Craniotomy Only Group

Objective

Patients with traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) often require surgical treatment. Among patients who primarily underwent craniotomy for the removal of hematoma, some consequently developed aggressive intracranial hypertension and brain edema, and required secondary decompressive craniectomy (DC). To avoid reoperation, we investigated factors which predict the requirement of DC by comparing groups of ASDH patients who did and did not require DC after craniotomy.

Methods

The 129 patients with ASDH who underwent craniotomy from September 2007 to September 2017 were reviewed. Among these patients, 19 patients who needed additional DC (group A) and 105 patients who underwent primary craniotomy only without reoperation (group B) were evaluated. A total of 17 preoperative and intraoperative factors were analyzed and compared statistically. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to compare these factors.

Results

Five factors showed significant differences between the two groups. They were the length of midline shifting to maximal subdural hematoma thickness ratio (magnetization transfer [MT] ratio) greater than 1 (p<0.001), coexistence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (p<0.001), traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (TICH) (p=0.001), intraoperative findings showing intracranial hypertension combined with brain edema (p<0.001), and bleeding tendency (p=0.02). An average value of 2.74±1.52 was obtained for these factors for group A, which was significantly different from that for group B (p<0.001).

Conclusion

An MT ratio >1, IVH, and TICH on preoperative brain computed tomography images, intraoperative signs of intracranial hypertension, brain edema, and bleeding tendency were identified as factors indicating that DC would be required. The necessity for preemptive DC must be carefully considered in patients with such risk factors.

Predictors of Functional Outcome After Subdural Hematoma: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

Although the incidence of subdural hematoma (SDH) has increased in the US in the last decade, limited prospective data exist examining risk factors for poor outcome.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study of consecutive SDH patients was conducted from 7/2008 to 11/2011. Baseline clinical data, hospital and surgical course, complications, and imaging data were compared between those with good versus poor 3-month outcomes (modified Rankin Scores [mRS] 0-3 vs. 4-6). A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to identify independent predictors of poor outcome.

RESULTS

116 SDH patients (18 acute, 56 mixed acute/subacute/chronic, 42 subacute/chronic) were included. At 3 months, 61 (53 %) patients had good outcomes (mRS 0-3) while 55 (47 %) were severely disabled or dead (mRS 4-6). Of those who underwent surgical evacuation, 54/94 (57 %) had good outcomes compared to 7/22 (32 %) who did not (p = 0.030). Patients with mixed acuity or subacute/chronic SDH had significantly better 3-month mRS with surgery (median mRS 1 versus 5 without surgery, p = 0.002) compared to those with only acute SDH (p = 0.494). In multivariable analysis, premorbid mRS, age, admission Glasgow Coma Score, history of smoking, and fever were independent predictors of poor 3-month outcome (all p < 0.05; area under the curve 0.90), while SDH evacuation tended to improve outcomes (adjusted OR 3.90, 95 % CI 0.96-18.9, p = 0.057).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 50 % of SDH patients were dead or moderate-severely disabled at 3 months. Older age, poor baseline, poor admission neurological status, history of smoking, and fever during hospitalization predicted poor outcomes, while surgical evacuation was associated with improved outcomes among those with mixed acuity or chronic/subacute SDH.

Decompressive Craniectomy in Conjunction With Evacuation of Intracranial Hemorrhagic Lesions Is Associated With Worse Outcomes in Elderly Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Propensity Score Analysis

BACKGROUND

When it comes to evacuating intracranial hemorrhagic lesions in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), neurosurgeons perform either a craniotomy or a decompressive craniectomy (DC). The aim of the present study was to estimate the impact of DC on outcomes in elderly patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study, conducted in a neurosurgical institute in Japan from April 2009 to June 2014, included 91 consecutive patients with TBI (aged 60 years or older) who underwent evacuation of intracranial hemorrhagic lesions. Patients were divided into 2 groups: craniotomy only or DC. We set the primary endpoint as an unfavorable outcome (death or vegetative state), as evaluated on the Glasgow Outcome Scale at 6 months after injury. The secondary endpoints included existence of delayed hemorrhage and occurrence of hydrocephalus requiring shunt placement. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method was used to develop a propensity model to adjust for baseline imbalances between groups.

RESULTS

The DC group exhibited greater severity both in clinical and computed tomography findings according to baseline characteristics. After we adjusted for these differences by inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score, DC was significantly associated with unfavorable outcomes (adjusted odds ratio, 8.00; 95% confidential interval, 2.30-27.84; P = 0.002) and delayed hemorrhage (adjusted odds ratio, 13.42; 95% confidential interval, 1.52-118.89; P = 0.022). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of hydrocephalus requiring shunt placement.

CONCLUSIONS

DC in conjunction with evacuation of intracranial hemorrhagic lesions was associated with worse functional outcome in elderly patients with TBI.

[Urgency of neurosurgical interventions for severe traumatic brain injury]

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess whether the time interval between accident and neurosurgical intervention has an influence on functional neurological outcome and mortality in severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) or whether the further clinical course has already been determined by the initial severity of the injury.

METHODS

Data were derived from the Trauma Registry of the German Society of Trauma Surgery. A total of 770 patients were identified who had undergone decompressive surgery, had an ISS ≥ 9 and for whom time of accident and start of surgery had been documented. To evaluate the possible influence of the time factor on outcome and mortality, these patients were subdivided into five groups according to time until decompression (I: < 2 h, II: 2-3 h, III: 3-6 h, IV: 6-24 h and V: > 24 h). Aside from mortality we analysed AIS, GCS, age and ISS in survivors and non-survivors.

RESULTS

Complete data were available for 770 patients with sTBI (AIS skull ≥3). The average age was 39.9 years and 71.6% were male. The average overall injury severity was reflected by an ISS score of 31.3 and the average AIS head score was 4.51. Of the 570 who underwent surgery in less than 6 h (groups 1-III), 33% died (188/570). Of the remaining 200 patients 40 died (20%). Mortality decreased throughout the groups (49 to 14%), as did the severity of the head injury (AIS 4.66 to 4.23); GCS on the other hand increased with the time between accident and surgery (5.9 to 8.8).

CONCLUSION

We could not substantiate that reducing the time between accident and neurosurgical decompression could decrease mortality. It rather seems that the initial magnitude of brain damage determines prognosis and outcome after sTBI. The interval between the appearance of neurological symptoms (e.g. anisocoria) and neurosurgical intervention plays an important role and should be kept as short as possible.

Outcome following evacuation of acute subdural haematomas: a comparison of craniotomy with decompressive craniectomy

BACKGROUND

Acute subdural haematomas (ASDH) occur commonly following traumatic brain injury and may be evacuated by either craniotomy (CR) or decompressive craniectomy (DC). We reviewed a series of consecutive patients undergoing evacuation of a traumatic ASDH at a regional centre, comparing observed clinical outcomes (assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale at six months) with those predicted by the CRASH-CT prognostic model.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

RESULTS

Ninety-one patients were identified (51 DC and 40 CR ). Eighty-five had available admission data sets from which predicted outcome could be calculated. The DC group were younger than the CR group (p = 0.015). The DC group also had a greater proportion of patients whose pre-intubation GCS was ≤8 (p = 0.001), with significant extracranial injuries (p = 0.001) and obliterated basal cisterns (p = 0.001) on their pre-operative CT scan. Bone flaps in the DC group (n = 45) were longer (mean 11.6 cm; 95 % CI: 11.1-12.1) in comparison to bone flaps in the CR (n = 34) group [(mean 10.2 cm; 95 % CI: 9.35 - 10.9); p = 0.0024] The mean CRASH-CT predicted risk of 14-day mortality and of unfavourable outcome at six months was significantly higher in the DC group compared with the CR group. Eighty-eight patients had available 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale scores. Favourable outcomes were observed in 42 % of DC versus 45 % of CR (p = 0.83). The overall mortality rate was 38 % in DC versus 32 % in CR (p = 0.65). The standardised morbidity ratio (observed/expected unfavourable outcomes) was 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.51-1.07) for DC and 0.90 (95 % CI: 0.57-1.35) for CR.

CONCLUSIONS

CR and DC for traumatic ASDH are both commonly used for primary evacuation of ASDH. Primary DC may be more effective than CR for selected patients with ASDH. Class I evidence is required in order to refine the indications for DC following evacuation of ASDH.

Neurological outcomes of neurosurgical operations for multiple trauma elderly patients in Hong Kong

Background:

We aimed to investigate neurological outcomes in elderly patients with multiple trauma, and to review their clinical outcomes following neurosurgical operations.

Patients and Methods:

The study was conducted in a regional trauma center in Hong Kong. We collected prospective data on consecutive trauma patients from January 2001 to December 2008. Patients with multiple trauma (as defined by Injury Severity Score of 15 or more), with both head injury and extracranial injury, were included for analysis.

Results:

Age over 65 years, admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and Injury Severity Score were significantly poor prognostic factors in logistic regression analysis. Eleven (32%) of the 34 patients aged over 65 who underwent neurosurgical operations attained favorable neurological outcomes (GCS 4-5) at 6 months.

Conclusions:

Age was an important prognostic factor in multiple trauma patients requiring neurosurgical operations. Future randomized controlled clinical trials should be designed to recruit elderly patients (such as age between 65 and 75 years) at clinical equipoise for traumatic hematoma (such as subdural hematoma or traumatic intracerebral hematoma) evacuation and assess the quality of life, neurological, and cognitive outcomes.

Decompressive craniectomy – friend or foe?

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is the surgical management removing part of the skull vault over a swollen brain used to treat elevated intracranial pressure that is unresponsive to maximal medical therapy. The commonest indication for DC is traumatic brain injury (TBI) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction, though DC has been reported to have been used for treatment of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage and venous infarction. Despite an increasing number of reports supportive of DC, the controversy over the suitability of the procedure and criteria for patient selection remains unresolved. Although the majority of published studies are retrospective, the recent publication of several randomised prospective studies prompts a re-evaluation of the use of DC. We review the literature concerning the pathophysiology, indication, surgical techniques and timing, complications and long-term effects of DC (including reversal with cranioplasty), in order to rationalise its use. We conclude that at the time of this review, though we cannot support the routine use of DC in TBI or MCA stroke, there is evidence that early and aggressive use of DC in TBI patients with intracranial haematomas or younger malignant MCA stroke patients may improve outcome. Though the results of the DECRA trial suggest that primary DC may worsen outcome, the decision to perform DC after diffuse TBI is still individualised. We await the results of the RESCUEicp trial to ascertain whether an evidence-based protocol for its use can be agreed in the future.