Classification of PARP Inhibitors Based on PARP Trapping and Catalytic Inhibition, and Rationale for Combinations with Topoisomerase I Inhibitors and Alkylating Agents

Synergy trap for guardian angels of DNA: Unraveling the anticancer potential of phthalazinone-thiosemicarbazone hybrids through dual PARP-1 and TOPO-I inhibition

Targeting DNA repair, like PARP-1 and TOPO-I, shows promise in cancer therapy. However, resistance to single agents requires complex and costly combination strategies with significant side effects. Thus, there's an urgent need for single agents with dual inhibition. Current dual inhibitors focusing on the C-4 position of the phthalazinone core for PARP inhibition often have high molecular weights. Clinical use of PARP inhibitors is limited by hematological and other toxicities from concurrent PARP-2 inhibition. They're mainly effective in gynecological cancers, despite high PARP-1 and TOPO-I expression in various cancers. Moreover, their efficacy is limited to BRCA1-expressing breast cancer. In this study, we synthesized 27 dual inhibitors for PARP-1 and TOPO-I with molecular weights below 500 g/mol through hybridizing a phthalazinone core with a thiosemicarbazone linker. Among these, 6c demonstrated exceptional broad spectrum and potency against the NCI 60 cancer cell lines, with GI50 values from 1.65 to 5.63 µM. Notably, 6c exposed the highest PARP-1 inhibition (IC50 = 32.2 ± 3.26 nM) and a selectivity over PARP-2 (IC50 = 2844 ± 111 nM). Furthermore, 6c's inhibition of TOPO-I (IC50 = 46.2 ± 3.3 nM) surpassed the control camptothecin by eleven-fold. Mechanistically, 6c disrupted the cell cycle at the S phase, induced apoptosis, and displayed a favorable safety profile against normal cells. Compound 6c induced PARP trapping and synthetic lethality and showed high efficacy on BRCA1-expressing cell lines. So, decreasing the likelihood of cancer cell resistance to chemotherapy. Drug-likeness predictions and molecular modeling were also performed.

PARP inhibitor resistance mechanisms and PARP inhibitor derived imaging probes

INTRODUCTION

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibition has become a major target in anticancer therapy. While PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for homologous recombination (HR) deficient cancers, therapeutic resistance is a challenge and PARPi are now being investigated in cancers lacking HR deficiencies. This creates a need to develop molecular and imaging biomarkers of PARPi response to improve patient selection and circumvent therapeutic resistance.

AREAS COVERED

PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov were queried for studies on PARPi resistance and imaging. This review summarizes established and emerging resistance mechanisms to PARPi, and the current state of imaging and theragnostic probes for PARPi, including fluorescently labeled and radiolabeled probes.

EXPERT OPINION

While progress has been made in understanding PARPi therapeutic resistance, clinical evidence remains lacking and relatively little is known regarding PARPi response outside of HR deficiencies. Continued research will clarify the importance of known biomarkers and resistance mechanisms in patient cohorts and the broader utility of PARPi. Progress has also been made in PARPi imaging, particularly with radiolabeled probes, and both imaging and theragnostic probes have now reached clinical validation. Reducing abdominal background signal from probe clearance will broaden their applicability, and improvements to molecular synthesis and radiation delivery will increase their utility.

Targeting DNA damage response in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A review of preclinical and clinical evidence

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with one of the most unfavorable prognoses across all malignancies. In this review, we investigate the role of inhibitors targeting crucial regulators of DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, either as single treatments or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents and targeted therapies in PDAC. The most prominent clinical benefit of PARP inhibitors' monotherapy is related to the principle of synthetic lethality in individuals harboring BRCA1/2 and other DDR gene mutations as predictive biomarkers. Moreover, induction of BRCAness with inhibitors of RTKs, including VEGFR and c-MET and their downstream signaling pathways, RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR in order to expand the application of PARP inhibitors in patients without DDR mutations, has also been addressed. Other DDR-targeting agents beyond PARP inhibitors, including inhibitors of ATM, ATR, CHEK1/2, and WEE1 have also demonstrated their potential in preclinical models of PDAC and may hold promise in future studies.

PARP inhibitors for prostate cancer

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have transformed the treatment landscape for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and alterations in DNA damage response genes. This has also led to widespread use of genomic testing in all patients with mCRPC. The current review will give an overview of (1) the current understanding of the interplay between DNA damage response and PARP enzymes; (2) the clinical landscape of PARP inhibitors, including the combination of PARP inhibitors with other agents such as androgen-receptor signaling agents; (3) biomarkers related to PARP inhibitor response and resistance; and (4) considerations for interpreting genomic testing results and treating patients with PARP inhibitors.

Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors for Arsenic Trioxide-Resistant Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Synergistic In Vitro Antitumor Effects with Hypomethylating Agents or High-Dose Vitamin C

Arsenic trioxide (ATO) is an anticancer agent used for the treatment ofacute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). However, 5%-10% of patients fail to respond or experience disease relapse. Based on poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1 involvement in the processing of DNA demethylation, here we have tested the in vitro susceptibility of ATO-resistant clones (derived from the human APL cell line NB4) to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in combination with hypomethylating agents (azacitidine and decitabine) or high-dose vitamin C (ascorbate), which induces 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC)-mediated DNA demethylation. ATO-sensitive and -resistant APL cell clones were generated and initially analyzed for their susceptibility to five clinically used PARPi (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, veliparib, and talazoparib). The obtained PARPi IC50 values were far below (olaparib and niraparib), within the range (talazoparib), or above (rucaparib and veliparib) the C max reported in patients, likely as a result of differences in the mechanisms of their cytotoxic activity. ATO-resistant APL cells were also susceptible to clinically relevant concentrations of azacitidine and decitabine and to high-dose ascorbate. Interestingly, the combination of these agents with olaparib, niraparib, or talazoparib resulted in synergistic antitumor activity. In combination with ascorbate, PARPi increased the ascorbate-mediated induction of 5hmC, which likely resulted in stalled DNA repair and cytotoxicity. Talazoparib was the most effective PARPi in synergizing with ascorbate, in accordance with its marked ability to trap PARP1 at damaged DNA. These findings suggest that ATO and PARPi have nonoverlapping resistance mechanisms and support further investigation on PARPi combination with hypomethylating agents or high-dose ascorbate for relapsed/ATO-refractory APL, especially in frail patients. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study found that poly(ADP-ribose) inhibitors (PARPi) show activity as single agents against human acute promyelocytic leukemia cells resistant to arsenic trioxide at clinically relevant concentrations. Furthermore, PARPi enhance the in vitro efficacy of azacitidine, decitabine, and high-dose vitamin C, all agents that alter DNA methylation. In combination with vitamin C, PARPi increase the levels of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, likely as a result of altered processing of the oxidized intermediates associated with DNA demethylation.

Drug mechanism-of-action discovery through the integration of pharmacological and CRISPR screens

Low success rates during drug development are due, in part, to the difficulty of defining drug mechanism-of-action and molecular markers of therapeutic activity. Here, we integrated 199,219 drug sensitivity measurements for 397 unique anti-cancer drugs with genome-wide CRISPR loss-of-function screens in 484 cell lines to systematically investigate cellular drug mechanism-of-action. We observed an enrichment for positive associations between the profile of drug sensitivity and knockout of a drug's nominal target, and by leveraging protein-protein networks, we identified pathways underpinning drug sensitivity. This revealed an unappreciated positive association between mitochondrial E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase MARCH5 dependency and sensitivity to MCL1 inhibitors in breast cancer cell lines. We also estimated drug on-target and off-target activity, informing on specificity, potency and toxicity. Linking drug and gene dependency together with genomic data sets uncovered contexts in which molecular networks when perturbed mediate cancer cell loss-of-fitness and thereby provide independent and orthogonal evidence of biomarkers for drug development. This study illustrates how integrating cell line drug sensitivity with CRISPR loss-of-function screens can elucidate mechanism-of-action to advance drug development.

PARP Trapping Beyond Homologous Recombination and Platinum Sensitivity in Cancers

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) have recently been approved for the treatment of ovarian and breast cancers with BRCA mutations, as well as for maintenance therapies regardless of BRCA mutation for ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers that previously responded to platinum-based chemotherapy. The rationale of these indications is derived from the facts that cancer cells with BRCA mutations are defective in homologous recombination (HR), which confers synthetic lethality with PARPis, and that some of the sensitivity-determining factors for PARPis are shared with platinums. Although BRCA1 and BRCA2 are central for HR, more players within and beyond HR are emerging as response determinants to PARPis. Furthermore, there are similarities as well as differences in the DNA lesions and repair pathways induced by PARPis, platinums, and camptothecin topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) inhibitors. Here we review the sensitivity-determining factors for PARPis and the rationale for using PARPis as single agents and in combination therapy for cancers.

Laying a trap to kill cancer cells: PARP inhibitors and their mechanisms of action

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are the first DNA damage response targeted agents approved for cancer therapy. Here, we focus on their molecular mechanism of action by PARP "trapping" and what this means for both clinical monotherapy and combination with chemotherapeutic agents.

Targeting DNA repair and replication stress in the treatment of ovarian cancer

Approximately half of high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancers incur alterations in genes of homologous recombination (BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, Fanconi anemia genes), and the rest incur alterations in other DNA repair pathways at high frequencies. Such cancer-specific gene alterations can confer selective sensitivity to DNA damaging agents such as cisplatin and carboplatin, topotecan, etoposide, doxorubicin, and gemcitabine. Originally presumed to inhibit DNA repair, PARP inhibitors that have recently been approved by the FDA for the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer also act as DNA damaging agents by inducing PARP-DNA complexes. These DNA damaging agents induce different types of DNA lesions that require various DNA repair genes for the repair, but commonly induce replication fork slowing or stalling, also referred to as replication stress. Replication stress activates DNA repair checkpoint proteins (ATR, CHK1), which prevent further DNA damage. Hence, targeting DNA repair genes or DNA repair checkpoint genes augments the anti-tumor activity of DNA damaging agents. This review describes the rational basis for using DNA repair and DNA repair checkpoint inhibitors as single agents. The review also presents the strategies combining these inhibitors with DNA damaging agents for ovarian cancer therapy based on specific gene alterations.