The ultrastructural basis of actin filament regulation

High-speed AFM reveals subsecond dynamics of cardiac thin filaments upon Ca2+ activation and heavy meromyosin binding

High-speed atomic force microscopy (HS-AFM) can be used to study dynamic processes with real-time imaging of molecules within 1- to 5-nm spatial resolution. In the current study, we evaluated the 3-state model of activation of cardiac thin filaments (cTFs) isolated as a complex and deposited on a mica-supported lipid bilayer. We studied this complex for dynamic conformational changes 1) at low and high [Ca2+] (pCa 9.0 and 4.5), and 2) upon myosin binding to the cTF in the nucleotide-free state or in the presence of ATP. HS-AFM was used to directly visualize the tropomyosin-troponin complex and Ca2+-induced tropomyosin movements accompanied by structural transitions of actin monomers within cTFs. Our data show that cTFs at relaxing or activating conditions are not ultimately in a blocked or activated state, respectively, but rather the combination of states with a prevalence that is dependent on the [Ca2+] and the presence of weakly or strongly bound myosin. The weakly and strongly bound myosin induce similar changes in the structure of cTFs as confirmed by the local dynamical displacement of individual tropomyosin strands in the center of a regulatory unit of cTF at the relaxed and activation conditions. The displacement of tropomyosin at the relaxed conditions had never been visualized directly and explains the ability of myosin binding to TF at the relaxed conditions. Based on the ratios of nonactivated and activated segments within cTFs, we proposed a mechanism of tropomyosin switching from different states that includes both weakly and strongly bound myosin.

Electron microscopy and three-dimensional reconstruction of native thin filaments reveal species-specific differences in regulatory strand densities

Throughout the animal kingdom striated muscle contraction is regulated by the thin filament troponin-tropomyosin complex. Homologous regulatory components are shared among vertebrate and arthropod muscles; however, unique protein extensions and/or components characterize the latter. The Troponin T (TnT) isoforms of Drosophila indirect flight and tarantula femur muscle for example contain distinct C-terminal extensions and are approximately 20% larger overall than their vertebrate counterpart. Using electron microscopy and three-dimensional helical reconstruction of native Drosophila, tarantula and frog muscle thin filaments we have identified species-specific differences in tropomyosin regulatory strand densities. The strands on the arthropod thin filaments were significantly larger in diameter than those from vertebrates, although not significantly different from each other. These findings reflect differences in the regulatory troponin-tropomyosin complex, which are likely due to the larger TnT molecules aligning and extending along much of the tropomyosin strands' length. Such an arrangement potentially alters the physical properties of the regulatory strands and may help establish contractile characteristics unique to certain arthropod muscles.

Invertebrate muscles: thin and thick filament structure; molecular basis of contraction and its regulation, catch and asynchronous muscle

This is the second in a series of canonical reviews on invertebrate muscle. We cover here thin and thick filament structure, the molecular basis of force generation and its regulation, and two special properties of some invertebrate muscle, catch and asynchronous muscle. Invertebrate thin filaments resemble vertebrate thin filaments, although helix structure and tropomyosin arrangement show small differences. Invertebrate thick filaments, alternatively, are very different from vertebrate striated thick filaments and show great variation within invertebrates. Part of this diversity stems from variation in paramyosin content, which is greatly increased in very large diameter invertebrate thick filaments. Other of it arises from relatively small changes in filament backbone structure, which results in filaments with grossly similar myosin head placements (rotating crowns of heads every 14.5 nm) but large changes in detail (distances between heads in azimuthal registration varying from three to thousands of crowns). The lever arm basis of force generation is common to both vertebrates and invertebrates, and in some invertebrates this process is understood on the near atomic level. Invertebrate actomyosin is both thin (tropomyosin:troponin) and thick (primarily via direct Ca(++) binding to myosin) filament regulated, and most invertebrate muscles are dually regulated. These mechanisms are well understood on the molecular level, but the behavioral utility of dual regulation is less so. The phosphorylation state of the thick filament associated giant protein, twitchin, has been recently shown to be the molecular basis of catch. The molecular basis of the stretch activation underlying asynchronous muscle activity, however, remains unresolved.

In Situ Orientations of Protein Domains

A recently developed approach for mapping protein-domain orientations in the cellular environment was used to investigate the Ca(2+)-dependent structural changes in the tropomyosin/troponin complex on the actin filament that regulate muscle contraction. Polarized fluorescence from bifunctional rhodamine probes attached along four alpha helices of troponin C (TnC) was measured in permeabilized skeletal muscle fibers. In relaxed muscle, the N-terminal lobe of TnC is less closed than in crystal structures of the Ca(2+)-free domain, and its D helix is approximately perpendicular to the actin filament. In contrast to crystal structures of isolated TnC, the D and E helices are not collinear. On muscle activation, the N lobe orientation becomes more disordered and the average angle between the C helix and the filament changes by 32 degrees +/- 5 degrees. These results illustrate the potential of in situ measurements of helix and domain orientations for elucidating structure-function relations in native macromolecular complexes.