Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with (177)Lu labeled somatostatin analogs DOTATATE and DOTATOC: contrasting renal dosimetry in the same patient

Clinical perspectives on dosimetry in molecular radiotherapy

Molecular radiotherapy is the use of systemically administered unsealed radioactive sources to treat cancer. Theragnostics is the term used to describe paired radiopharmaceuticals localising to a specific target, one optimised for imaging, the other for therapy. For many decades, molecular radiotherapy has developed empirically. Standard administered activity schedules have been used without the prior estimation of the resulting tumour radiation absorbed dose by theragnostic imaging, or its subsequent measurement by serial scanning. This pragmatic approach has benefited many patients, however others who should have benefited have failed to do so as the radiation absorbed dose in the tumour was suboptimal. The accurate prediction and measurement of tumour and organ at risk radiation absorbed doses allows treatment to be personalised, and offers the prospect of improved clinical outcomes. To deliver this for all molecular radiotherapy patients would require not only a significant financial investment in equipment and skilled personnel, but also a change in attitude of those who believe that simple - or simplistic - schedules are easier to deliver, and that accurate dosimetry is too much trouble. Further clinical studies are required to demonstrate beyond doubt that the advantages of individualised treatment planning outweigh the inconvenience, and that the expense is justified by enhanced results.

Vaccinia virus and peptide-receptor radiotherapy synergize to improve treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis

Tumor-specific overexpression of receptors enables a variety of targeted cancer therapies, exemplified by peptide-receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) for somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive neuroendocrine tumors. While effective, PRRT is restricted to tumors with SSTR overexpression. To overcome this limitation, we propose using oncolytic vaccinia virus (vvDD)-mediated receptor gene transfer to permit molecular imaging and PRRT in tumors without endogenous SSTR overexpression, a strategy termed radiovirotherapy. We hypothesized that vvDD-SSTR combined with a radiolabeled somatostatin analog could be deployed as radiovirotherapy in a colorectal cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis model, producing tumor-specific radiopeptide accumulation. Following vvDD-SSTR and ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC treatment, viral replication and cytotoxicity, as well as biodistribution, tumor uptake, and survival, were evaluated. Radiovirotherapy did not alter virus replication or biodistribution, but synergistically improved vvDD-SSTR-induced cell killing in a receptor-dependent manner and significantly increased the tumor-specific accumulation and tumor-to-blood ratio of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC, making tumors imageable by microSPECT/CT and causing no significant toxicity. ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC significantly improved survival over virus alone when combined with vvDD-SSTR but not control virus. We have therefore demonstrated that vvDD-SSTR can convert receptor-negative tumors into receptor-positive tumors and facilitate molecular imaging and PRRT using radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. Radiovirotherapy represents a promising treatment strategy with potential applications in a wide range of cancers.

Dosimetry of 177Lu-DOTATOC first circle treatment in patients with advanced metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: A pilot study in China

First cycle dosimetry calculation of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC (single activity:1.59-3.49 GBq) was carried out in eight patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) who underwent whole-body planar (0.5, 24, 48, 72 h) and SPECT/CT scans (24 h). Focal uptake of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC was found in primary and metastatic tumors. Organs with the highest absorbed doses per injected activity were tumors (1.293 ± 0.862 mGy/MBq) and spleen (0.461 ± 0.408 mGy/MBq), while low absorbed doses were observed in kidneys (0.384 ± 0.112 mGy/MBq) and bone marrow (0.0297 ± 0.0123 mGy/MBq). ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC is safe, well-tolerated and appropriate in Chinese NETs patients for PRRT.

The Dependence of Renal 68Ga[Ga]-DOTATOC Uptake on Kidney Function and Its Relevance for Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy with 177Lu[Lu]-DOTATOC

Background: In addition to its SSTR-specific binding in tumors and healthy tissues, DOTATOC analogues accumulate in kidney parenchyma. Renal tracer uptake might be a surrogate of kidney function or dysfunction. This study aimed to evaluate if kidney function can be estimated from ⁶⁸Ga[Ga]-DOTATOC uptake in PET/CT and its impact on the nephrotoxicity of ¹⁷⁷Lu[Lu]-DOTATOC PRRT. Methods: Two cohorts of patients (A: 128 diagnostic patients; B: 32 PRRT patients) were evaluated retrospectively. SUV values of the kidneys, physiologically SSTR-expressing organs and in background compartments were assessed. Kidney function was calculated as eGFR by CKD-EPI creatinine equation. Pearson’s correlation coefficients and treatment-induced changes of uptake and kidney function were assessed and compared. Results: Kidney function and renal DOTATOC uptake showed a significant inverse correlation (R² = 0.037; p = 0.029). Evaluated models of PET/CT measurements were not able to predict kidney function sufficiently. The uptake of other organs did not depend on eGFR. While the renal uptake increased after PRRT (p < 0.001), the kidney function did not change significantly (p = 0.382). Neither low pre-therapeutic eGFR nor high pre-therapeutic kidney uptake were risk factors of PRRT-induced deterioration in kidney function. Conclusion: The relevance of kidney function for renal ⁶⁸Ga[Ga]-DOTATOC uptake is limited. The nephrotoxicity of ¹⁷⁷Lu[Lu]-DOTATOC PRRT might be low and cannot be reliably predicted by pre-therapeutic measurements.

Three-dimensional Monte Carlo-based voxel-wise tumor dosimetry in patients with neuroendocrine tumors who underwent 177Lu-DOTATOC therapy

Background

Patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the midgut are suitable candidates for ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC therapy. Integrated SPECT/CT systems have the potential to help improve the accuracy of patient-specific tumor dosimetry. Dose estimations to target organs are generally performed using the Medical Internal Radiation Dose scheme. We present a novel Monte Carlo-based voxel-wise dosimetry approach to determine organ- and tumor-specific total tumor doses (TTD).

Methods

A cohort of 14 patients with histologically confirmed metastasized NETs of the midgut (11 men, 3 women, 62.3 ± 11.0 years of age) underwent a total of 39 cycles of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC therapy (mean 2.8 cycles, SD ± 1 cycle). After the first cycle of therapy, regions of interest were defined manually on the SPECT/CT images for the kidneys, the spleen, and all 198 tracer-positive tumor lesions in the field of view. Four SPECT images, taken at 4 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after injection of the radiopharmaceutical, were used to determine their effective half-lives in the structures of interest. The absorbed doses were calculated by a three-dimensional dosimetry method based on Monte Carlo simulations. TTD was calculated as the sum of all products of single tumor doses with single tumor volumes divided by the sum of all tumor volumes.

Results

The average dose values per cycle were 3.41 ± 1.28 Gy (1.91–6.22 Gy) for the kidneys, 4.40 ± 2.90 Gy (1.14–11.22 Gy) for the spleen, and 9.70 ± 8.96 Gy (1.47–39.49 Gy) for all ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATOC-positive tumor lesions. Low- and intermediate-grade tumors (G 1–2) absorbed a higher TTD compared to high-grade tumors (G 3) (signed-rank test, p =  < 0.05). The pre-therapeutic chromogranin A (CgA) value and the TTD correlated significantly (Pearson correlation:  = 0.67, p = 0.01). Higher TTD resulted in a significant decrease of CgA after therapy.

Conclusion

These results suggest that Monte Carlo-based voxel-wise dosimetry is a very promising tool for predicting the absorbed TTD based on histological and clinical parameters.

Dosimetry methods and clinical applications in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for neuroendocrine tumours: a literature review

Background

The main challenge for systemic radiation therapy using radiopharmaceuticals (SRT) is to optimise the dose delivered to the tumour, while minimising normal tissue irradiation. Dosimetry could help to increase therapy response and decrease toxicity after SRT by individual treatment planning. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an accepted SRT treatment option for irresectable and metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NET). However, dosimetry in PRRT is not routinely performed, mainly due to the lack of evidence in literature and clinical implementation difficulties. The goal of this review is to provide insight in dosimetry methods and requirements and to present an overview of clinical aspects of dosimetry in PRRT for NET.

Methods

A PubMed query including the search criteria dosimetry, radiation dose, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and radionuclide therapy was performed. Articles were selected based on title and abstract, and description of dosimetric approach.

Results

A total of 288 original articles were included. The most important dosimetry methods, their main advantages and limitations, and implications in the clinical setting are discussed. An overview of dosimetry in clinical studies regarding PRRT treatment for NET is provided.

Conclusion

Clinical dosimetry in PRRT is feasible and can result in improved treatment outcomes. Current clinical dosimetry studies focus on safety and apply non-voxel-based dosimetry methods. Personalised treatment using sophisticated dosimetry methods to assess tumour and normal tissue uptake in clinical trials is the next step towards routine dosimetry in PRRT for NET.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-018-0443-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Safety and Survival Analysis in 69 Patients

To date, limited data are available concerning peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of grade 3 (G3) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) with a Ki-67 proliferation index of greater than 20%. The purpose of this study was to analyze the long-term outcome, efficacy, and safety of PRRT in patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-expressing G3 NENs. Methods: A total of 69 patients (41 men; age, 28-81 y) received PRRT with ¹⁷⁷Lu- or ⁹⁰Y-labeled somatostatin analogs (DOTATATE or DOTATOC). Twenty-two patients had radiosensitizing chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), defined from the start of PRRT, including a subgroup analysis for patients with a Ki-67 index of less than or equal to 55% and a Ki-67 index of greater than 55%. Treatment response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 as well as molecular imaging criteria (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer). Short- and long-term toxicity was documented (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, v 5.0) using a structured database (comprising >250 items per patient) and retrospectively analyzed. Results: Forty-six patients had pancreatic NENs, 11 had unknown primary cancer, 6 had midgut NENs, 3 had gastric NENs, and 3 had rectal NENs. The median follow-up was 94.3 mo. The median PFS was 9.6 mo, and the median OS was 19.9 mo. For G3 NENs with a Ki-67 index of less than or equal to 55% (n = 53), the median PFS was 11 mo and the median OS was 22 mo. Patients with a Ki-67 index of greater than 55% (n = 11) had a median PFS of 4 mo and a median OS of 7 mo. For patients with positive SSTR imaging but no ¹⁸F-FDG uptake, the median PFS was 24 mo and the median OS was 42 mo. A significant difference was found for both PFS and OS, with median PFS of 16 mo and 5 mo and median OS of 27 mo and 9 mo for an SUV_max of greater than 15.0 and an SUV_max of less than or equal to 15.0, respectively, on SSTR PET. In the group with ¹⁸F-FDG uptake scored as 3 or 4, the median PFS was 7.1 mo and the median OS was 17.2 mo. In the group with ¹⁸F-FDG uptake scored as 0-2, the median PFS was 24.3 mo and the median OS was 41.6 mo. PRRT was well tolerated by all patients; no grade 3 or grade 4 hematotoxicity occurred, and no clinically significant decline in renal function was observed. There was no hepatotoxicity. Conclusion: PRRT was tolerated well, without significant adverse effects, and was efficacious in G3 NENs; the clinical outcome was promising, especially in patients with a Ki-67 index of less than or equal to 55% and even in patients for whom chemotherapy had failed. Baseline ¹⁸F-FDG along with SSTR molecular imaging was useful for stratifying G3 NEN patients with high uptake on SSTR PET/CT and no or minor ¹⁸F-FDG avidity-a mismatch pattern that was associated with a better long-term prognosis.

Results and adverse events of personalized peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 90Yttrium and 177Lutetium in 1048 patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms

Introduction

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) of patients with somatostatin receptor expressing neuroendocrine neoplasms has shown promising results in clinical trials and a recently published phase III study.

Methods

In our center, 2294 patients were screened between 2004 and 2014 by ⁶⁸Ga somatostatin receptor (SSTR) PET/CT. Intention to treat analysis included 1048 patients, who received at least one cycle of ⁹⁰Yttrium or ¹⁷⁷Lutetium-based PRRT. Progression free survival was determined by ⁶⁸Ga SSTR-PET/CT and EORTC response criteria. Adverse events were determined by CTCAE criteria.

Results

Overall survival (95% confidence interval) of all patients was 51 months (47.0-54.9) and differed significantly according to radionuclide, grading, previous therapies, primary site and functionality. Progression free survival (based on PET/CT) of all patients was 19 months (16.9-21), which was significantly influenced by radionuclide, grading, and origin of neuroendocrine neoplasm. Progression free survival after initial progression and first and second resumption of PRRT after therapy-free intervals of more than 6 months were 11 months (9.4-12.5) and 8 months (6.4-9.5), respectively. Myelodysplastic syndrome or leukemia developed in 22 patients (2.1%) and 5 patients required hemodialysis after treatment, other adverse events were rare.

Conclusion

PRRT is effective and overall survival is favorable in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms depending on the radionuclide used for therapy, grading and origin of the neuroendocrine neoplasm which is not exactly mirrored in progression free survival as determined by highly sensitive ⁶⁸Ga somatostatin receptor PET/CT using EORTC criteria for determining response to therapy.

Lu-177-Based Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a systemic cytotoxic radiation therapy using a compound of β-emitting radionuclide chelated to a peptide for the treatment of tumor with overexpressed specific cell receptor such as somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2) of neuroendocrine tumor (NET). Surgical resection should be performed for the curative treatment for NETs when it is feasible; however, a multi-disciplinary approach is needed when locally advanced or metastasized disease. PRRT with lutetium-177 (Lu-177)-labeled somatostatin analogues, as a new treatment modality targeting metastatic or inoperable NETs expressing the SSTR2, have been developed and successfully used for the past two decades. As Lu-177 emits both β- and γ-radiation, it has the ability as a theragnostic agent for NETs compared with only β-emitting yttrium-90 labeled PRRT. Several recent studies reported that Lu-177 gave an overall positive response and improved the patients' quality of life. To fully exploit its potential, large comparative studies are needed for the assessment of distinct efficacies of Lu-177 labeled PRRT. Additionally, for extending the indications and developing new regimens of Lu-177-based PRRT, more dedicated clinical research is required.

Theranostics of Neuroendocrine Tumors

Somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography using ⁶⁸Ga-labeled somatostatin analogs is the mainstay for the evaluation of receptor status in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). This translates towards better therapy options, with increasing evidence of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) as the treatment of choice for advanced or progressive NETs. There are benefits in progression-free and overall survival as well as a significant improvement in clinical condition. In patients with progressive NETs, fractionated, personalized PRRT results in good therapeutic responses with no significant severe hematological and/or renal toxicity, thus improving quality of life.

Targeted Radionuclide Therapy: An Evolution Toward Precision Cancer Treatment

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews recent developments in targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) approaches directed to malignant liver lesions, bone metastases, neuroendocrine tumors, and castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer and discusses challenges and opportunities in this field.

CONCLUSION

TRT has been employed since the first radioiodine thyroid treatment almost 75 years ago. Progress in the understanding of the complex underlying biology of cancer and advances in radiochemistry science, multimodal imaging techniques including the concept of "see and treat" within the framework of theranostics, and universal traction with the notion of precision medicine have all contributed to a resurgence of TRT.

Pitfalls in the response evaluation after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with [177Lu-DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTA⁰,Tyr³]octreotate (¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE) is a treatment with good results in patients with metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEPNETs). However, there are some pitfalls that should be taken into consideration when evaluating the treatment response after PRRT. 354 Dutch patients with GEPNETs who were treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE between March 2000 and December 2011 were retrospectively selected. Liver function parameters and chromogranin A were measured before each therapy and in follow-up. Anatomical imaging was performed before therapy and in follow-up. An increase in aminotransferases by ≥20% compared to baseline was observed in 83 of 351 patients (24%). In patients with an objective response (OR) and stable disease (SD) this increase was observed in 71/297 (24%) and in patients with progressive disease (PD) it was observed in 12/54 patients (22%). An increase in chromogranin A by ≥20% compared to baseline was observed in 76 patients (29%). This was present in 34% of patients who eventually had PD and 27% of patients who had OR/SD. In 70% of patients this tumour marker returned to baseline levels after therapy. An increase in liver enzymes and chromogranin A is not uncommon after PRRT. In the vast majority of patients this will resolve in follow-up. Clinicians should be aware that these changes may occur due to radiation-induced inflammation or disease progression and that repeated measurements over time are necessary to differentiate between the two.

[(177)Lu-DOTA](0)-D-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-Octreotide ((177)Lu-DOTATOC) For Peptide Receptor Radiotherapy in Patients with Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumours: A Phase-II Study

PURPOSE

To characterise efficacy and safety of (177)Lu-DOTATOC as agent for peptide receptor radiotherapy (PRRT) of advanced neuroendocrine tumours (NET).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-six subjects with metastasized and progressive NET (50% gastroenteral, 26.8% pancreatic, 23.2% other primary sites) treated consecutively with (177)Lu-DOTATOC were analysed retrospectively. Subjects were administered (177)Lu-DOTATOC (mean 2.1 cycles; range 1-4) as 7.0GBq (median) doses at three-monthly intervals. Efficacy was analysed using CT and/or MRI according to RECIST 1.1 criteria and results were stratified for the number of administered cycles and the primary tumour origin.

RESULTS

In the total NET population (A), median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 17.4 and 34.2 months, respectively, assessed in a follow-up time (mean ± SD) of 16.1 ± 12.4 months. In patients receiving more than one cycle, mean follow-up time was 22.4 ± 11.0 months for all NETs (B) and PFS was 32.0 months for all NETs (B), 34.5 months for GEP-NET (C), and 11.9 months for other NETs (D). Objective response rates (Complete/Partial Responses) were 33.9%, 40.6%, 54.2%, and 0% for A, B, C, and D groups, respectively, while disease control rates in the same were 66.1%, 93.8%, 100%, and 75%. Complete responses (16.1%, 18.8% and 25.0% for groups A, B and C) were high, 78% of which were maintained throughout the follow up. There were no serious adverse events. One case of self-limiting grade 3 myelotoxicity was reported. Although 20% of patients had mild renal insufficiency at baseline, there was no evidence of exacerbated or de novo renal toxicity after treatment.

CONCLUSION

(177)Lu-DOTATOC is a novel agent for PRRT with major potential to induce objective tumour responses and sustained disease control in progressive neuroendocrine tumours, even when administered in moderate activities. The observed safety profile suggests a particularly favourable therapeutic index, including in patients with impaired bone marrow or renal function, which reflects a uniquely low uptake of (177)Lu-DOTATOC by normal organs.