Fear of progression

Protocol for the development and validation of a clinical measurement tool for fear of disease progression and recurrence in cardiac patients

Introduction

One in two cardiac patients fear having another heart event or their heart condition getting worse. Research in other chronic illnesses demonstrates that screening for fear of progression and recurrence is vital for adequately addressing such concerns in clinical care. The current project aims to develop and validate a measure for fear of progression and recurrence in cardiac patients.

Methods

The Fear of Cardiac Recurrence and Progression Scale (FCRP) will be developed through a multistep process. An initial item pool will be generated through a review of the literature and existing measures and consultation with and feedback from key informants. The item pool will be tested in a sample of over 250 adults who have ever had an acute coronary event, undergone cardiac surgery, or a chronic cardiac condition. Exploratory factor analysis will be used to identify the underlying factors, and Rasch analysis will be used to reduce the number of items. A short form version of the FCRP will be developed for use as a brief screening tool, informed by clinical relevance and Rasch psychometric indices.

Discussion

While many cardiac patients experience fears related to the progression or recurrence of their illness, there remains the need for a validated tool with which these concerns can be identified and measured. It is expected that the design and validation of the FCRP will aid identification of cardiac patients suffering from clinically significant levels of fear of progression and recurrence and facilitate the design of tailored psychological interventions to target these fears.

The impact of fear of cancer recurrence on the quality of life of breast cancer patients: A longitudinal study of the mediation effect of cortisol and hope

OBJECTIVE

This longitudinal study sought to explore the impact of cortisol and hope levels on Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR) and Quality of Life (QOL) in a cohort of 552 breast cancer patients from three centers in Wuhan City.

METHOD

A longitudinal study involving 552 breast cancer patients from three centers in Wuhan City utilized Chinese versions of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF), the Herth Hope Index (HHI), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) scale. Cortisol levels were measured thrice daily, and data was collected longitudinally three times. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 26.0 and Mplus 8.3, employing a longitudinal path model constructed via the cross-lagged method.

RESULTS

The results showed there were significant correlations between FCR, cortisol levels, and QOL at different time points. A significant mediating model was found with outcomes related to hope levels. Specifically, FCR predicted a decrease in hope levels (β = -0.163, p < 0.001), which in turn led to a decrease in overall QOL (β = -0.078, p < 0.001), with a mediation effect accounting for 10.34%. Although there were correlations between FCR, cortisol levels, and QOL at different time points, further analysis revealed that cortisol levels did not exhibit a mediating effect between the two (95% confidence interval: -0.002 to 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated there were significant correlations among FCR, QOL, and hope levels. Considering hope as a crucial mediator between FCR and QOL, potential intervention strategies for optimizing the QOL of breast cancer patients are proposed.

Dysfunctional Self-Focus and Fear of Progression in Cancer Patients Mediated by Depression, Anxiety, and Dysfunctional Sleep Beliefs

OBJECTIVE

This study explores whether cancer patients' dysfunctional self-focus is a significant contributor to their fear of progression. In addition, we investigated whether their psychiatric symptoms such as depression, anxiety, and dysfunctional beliefs about sleep may mediate the relationship between these factors.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective medical records review of 196 cancer patients who visited the Stress Management Clinic for the first time from March to September 2022. Their demographic information and responses to rating scales such as the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF), Dysfunctional Self-focus Attribution Scale (DSAS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Items (PHQ-9), State subcategory of the State and Trait of Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Cancer-related Dysfunctional Beliefs about Sleep scale (C-DBS), and numeric rating scales of pain and fatigue were collected.

RESULTS

A high FoP-Q-SF score was significantly correlated with high PHQ-9 (r=0.60), STAI-S (r=0.38), ISI (r=0.34), C-DBS (r=0.47), pain (r=0.24), fatigue (r=0.37), and DSAS (r=0.58, all p<0.001). A linear regression analysis showed that the FoP-Q-SF score was significantly predicted by younger age (β=-0.13, p=0.011), PHQ-9 (β=0.36, p<0.001), STAI-S (β=0.18, p=0.001), C-DBS (β=0.22, p<0.001), and DSAS (β=0.25, p<0.001). A mediation analysis showed that dysfunctional self-focus directly influenced patients' fear of progression. In addition, cancer patients' depression, anxiety, and cancer-related dysfunctional beliefs about sleep mediated this relationship.

CONCLUSION

We observed that dysfunctional self-focus may influence cancer patients' fear of progression, mediated by depression, anxiety, and cancer-related dysfunctional beliefs about sleep.

Resilience provides mediating effect of resilience between fear of progression and sleep quality in patients with hematological malignancies

BACKGROUND

Hematological tumors are common malignant tumors, with high morbidity and mortality rates. Most patients with hematological malignancies develop sleep disorders that seriously affect their life and health because of acute onset of disease, rapid progression, high recurrence rates, complex treatment methods, and treatment costs.

AIM

To explore the mediating effect of resilience on fear of disease progression and sleep quality in patients with hematological malignancies.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of 100 patients with hematological malignancies, treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University between August 2022 and August 2023, was conducted. Patients were assessed using a general data survey, a simplified scale for the fear of progression (FoP) of disease, a resilience scale, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between various patient characteristics and FoP, resilience, and sleep quality. Spearman's correlation analysis was used to examine the correlations between mental resilience, FoP, and sleep quality.

RESULTS

The total FoP score mean value in patients with hematological malignancies was 38.09 ± 5.16; the total resilience score mean value was 40.73 ± 7.04; and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index score mean value was 10.72 ± 1.90. FoP, resilience, and sleep quality of the patients were associated with family per capita monthly income and patient education level (P < 0.05). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that FoP was negatively correlated with resilience and sleep quality scores (r = -0.560, -0.537, P < 0.01), respectively, and resilience was significantly associated with sleep quality scores (r = 0.688, P < 0.01). Mediation analysis showed that the mediating effect of resilience between FoP and sleep quality in patients with hematological malignancies was -0.100 and accounted for 50.51% of the total effect. This indicated that FoP directly and indirectly affected sleep quality through the mesomeric effect of resilience.

CONCLUSION

Resilience is an intermediary variable between FoP and sleep quality in patients with hematological malignancies. Medical staff should evaluate and follow-up FoP and resilience to implement measures to improve sleep quality.

Benign or painful? The interpretation of pain and fear of progression in rheumatoid arthritis

ABSTRACT

People with chronic pain tend to interpret ambiguous information as health-related, more so than people without. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) exhibit this interpretation bias and whether it is associated with fear of disease progression (FoP). The interpretation biases of people with RA (n = 164) were compared with an age- and gender-matched control group. We hypothesized that (1) people with RA would have larger interpretation biases than people without; (2) those who scored in the clinical range for FoP would have larger interpretation bias than those who did not; (3) interpretation bias would moderate the relationship between pain severity and FoP; and (4) interpretation bias would explain variance in FoP above and beyond other established predictors. Our results confirmed that people with RA were more likely to interpret ambiguous information as health-related compared with people without RA. This effect was more pronounced for the RA subgroup with clinically significant FoP than those scoring in the normal range. We did not find evidence to suggest interpretation bias moderated the relationship between pain and FoP or that FoP added to the variance of other known predictors. Our results indicate that interpretation bias is common amongst people with RA and is associated with FoP. Further research is required to illuminate the exact nature of this relationship.

The level of cancer-related concerns and affecting factors in Turkish cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study

AIM

To examine and compare the level of cancer-related concerns and affecting factors between cancer survivors who completed their treatment and those still receiving treatment.

DESIGN

The study has a cross-sectional comparative design.

METHODS

Convenience sampling was used and the study included 350 Turkish cancer survivors. Data were collected between March and June 2022 online with a descriptive characteristics form and the Assessment of Survivor Concerns. Obtained data were analysed with numbers, percentages, mean values, t-test and multiple linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

The cancer survivors who completed their treatment had a significantly higher level of concerns than those who were still on treatment. Female cancer survivors, cancer survivors with less than 5-year time elapsing after diagnosis and gynaecological cancer survivors with completed cancer treatment can also have a higher level of cancer-related concerns.

CONCLUSION

Cancer survivors who have completed their treatment have a higher level of concerns than those who still receive treatment. Gender, time elapsing after diagnosis and type of cancer affect the level of concerns.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Nurses should evaluate psychosocial care and needs of cancer survivors in addition to their physical care. Raising awareness about the concerns of the cancer survivors with completed treatment in addition to those still receiving treatment and providing holistic care to them can reduce their concerns.

IMPACT

It is of great importance to be aware of the factors likely to increase cancer-related concerns during and after cancer treatment. This study identifies cancer-related concerns in cancer survivors who completed or were still receiving treatment and provides a comparison with other studies in the literature.

REPORTING METHOD

We have adhered to STROBE statement using STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

There was no patient or public involvement.

Health anxiety and the negative interpretation of children's bodily symptoms in mothers of cancer patients

PURPOSE

Fear of progression (FoP) is a substantial concern for family caregivers of cancer survivors and is related to a number of adverse outcomes, including increased mental distress and worse quality of life. Previous research has revealed that health anxiety (HA) contributes to fear of relapse, but cognitive factors underlying establishing and maintaining FoP in mothers of cancer patients have not been examined. In this study, we were looking to investigate this association.

METHODS

We used the computerized interpretation bias (IB) assessment to investigate the biased interpretation of ambiguous bodily information and its association with FoP through HA among 69 mothers of cancer patients and 42 mothers of healthy kids.

RESULTS

Mothers of cancer patients interpreted more negatively ambiguous bodily symptoms than mothers of healthy kids. Moreover, they had higher levels of HA and FoP and lower quality of life than the healthy group. Also, among mothers of cancer patients, the relationship between negative IB and FoP is mediated by their HA.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study imply that negative IB may contribute to increased HA, which in turn contributes to higher levels of FoP among the mothers of cancer patients, which may reduce the quality of life of their children.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

From these findings, we propose that changing HA through modification of IB might lower the FoP in mothers of kids with cancer and improve the mother and child's quality of life.

Fear of progression, loneliness, and hope in patients with gastrointestinal cancer: a cross-sectional relational study

Introduction

In recent years, fear of disease progression (FoP) has become one of the most common psychological problems in cancer patients. However, there are fewer studies on the FoP in patients with gastrointestinal tumors. We aimed to assess the level of FoP in patients with gastrointestinal tumors and analyze the factors related to FoP. We also aimed to examine the relationship among loneliness, hope and FoP in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted on three Grade A hospitals in southwestern China from November 2021 to July 2022. The demographic and clinical characteristics questionnaire, Fear of Disease Progression Scale (FoP-Q-SF), Cancer Loneliness Scale (CLS), and Herth Hope Index (HHI) were included in this study. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, one-way analysis of variance, and multiple linear regression analysis.

Results

In total, 245 gastrointestinal cancer patients participated in this study. The average (standard deviation) FoP score in patients was 32.94 ± 10.64. In total, 245 gastrointestinal cancer patients participated in this study. The average (standard deviation) FoP score in patients was 32.94  ±  10.64. The average score of CLS was 17.65  ±  6.71, and that for the HHI was 31.27  ±  7.73. Pearson correlation analysis showed that FoP was negatively significant correlated with hope level (r = -0.522) and FoP was positively significant correlated with loneliness (r = 0.545). Linear regression analysis showed that educational level, age, living condition, hope, and loneliness were the significant predictors of FoP and explained 53.10% of the variability in FoP (F = 16.372).

Conclusion

Findings highlight the need to strengthen attention to FoP in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Our study showed that gastrointestinal cancer patients who have a high school education, are age 45 to 59, live alone, high level of loneliness, and low level of hope have higher FoP. Medical staff should enhance clinical screening of FoP and consider the formulation of relevant interventions for high-risk groups to reduce loneliness among patients, raise their hope level, and reduce their FoP.

Development and initial validation of the ILD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (IAQ): A new instrument for assessing disease specific fears in interstitial lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Multiple studies focusing on chronic lung diseases (i.e. COPD), have indicated that the quality of life (QoL) can be impacted by disease-related fears. In the context of Interstitial Lung Diseases (ILD), however, these have never been systematically examined. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop and evaluate an appropriate measuring tool, and to investigate the influence of disease-related anxieties on QoL in ILD.

METHOD

N = 166 ILD patients participated in the study and completed an itempool on disease-related fears, based on the COPD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (CAF-R) and expert assessments. Further, demographic and psychological variables were assessed (anxiety: GAD-7, QoL: K-BILD; Beliefs about Health: KKG). Psychometric properties were analyzed (factor structure, reliability, validity). Regression analyses were used to calculate the differential predictive power of disease-related anxieties on QoL.

RESULTS

The factor structure was confirmed (Scales: Fear-of-Dependence-and-Progression, Fear-of-Social-Exclusion-and-Isolation, Fear-of-Physical-Activity, Fear-of-Dyspnea, and Sleep-related- Complaints). The Scales showed satisfying reliabilities (α = 0.68 to 0.89) and good validity. Disease-related anxieties proved to be differential predictors for different scales of the K-BILD (ß = -0.15 to ß = -0.58, all ps < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

The ILD-Anxiety-Questionnaire (IAQ) is an easy-to-use, valid measurement tool for assessing disease-related anxieties. These vary in their impact on different aspects of QoL. Therefore, it might aid in specifying the indication for potential psychological supplementary interventions. Additional long-term studies are required to investigate how specific anxieties affect both overall and condition-specific QoL in diverse situations.

Analysis of Anxiety, Depression and Fear of Progression at 12 Months Post-Cytoreductive Surgery in the SOCQER-2 (Surgery in Ovarian Cancer-Quality of Life Evaluation Research) Prospective, International, Multicentre Study

Patients with ovarian cancer (OC) often experience anxiety, depression and fear of progression (FOP); however, it is unclear whether surgical complexity has a role to play. We investigated the prevalence of anxiety, depression and FOP at 12 months post-cytoreductive surgery and investigated associations with surgical complexity, patient (age, ethnicity, performance status, BMI) and tumour (stage, disease load) factors. One hundred and forty-one patients with FIGO Stage III-IV OC, who did not have disease progression at 12 months post-surgery, completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and FOP short-form questionnaire. Patients underwent surgery with low (40.4%), intermediate (31.2%) and high (28.4%) surgical complexity scores. At 12 months post-surgery, 99 of 141 (70%) patients with advanced OC undergoing surgery experienced clinically significant anxiety, 21 of 141 (14.9%) patients experienced moderate to severe depression and 37 of 140 (26.4%) experienced dysfunctional FOP. No associations were identified between the three different surgical complexity groups with regards to anxiety, depression or FOP scores. Unsurprisingly, given the natural history of the disease, most patients with OC suffer from anxiety, depression and fear of progression after completion of first-line cancer treatment. Surgical complexity at the time of surgery is not associated with a deleterious impact on anxiety, depression or FOP for patients with OC. Patients with OC experience a profound mental health impact and should be offered mental health support throughout their cancer journey.

Death anxiety predicts fear of Cancer recurrence and progression in ovarian Cancer patients over and above other cognitive factors

Death anxiety is understudied in people with cancer, especially in relation to fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and fear of progression (FOP). The present study aimed to identify if death anxiety can predict FCR and FOP over and above other known theoretical predictors. One hundred and seventy-six participants with ovarian cancer were recruited for an online survey. We included theoretical variables, such as metacognitions, intrusive thoughts about cancer, perceived risk of recurrence or progression, and threat appraisal, in regression analyses to predict FCR or FOP. We investigated whether death anxiety added to the variance over and above these variables. Correlational analyses demonstrated that death anxiety is more strongly associated with FOP than FCR. The hierarchical regression including the theoretical variables described above predicted 62-66% of variance in FCR and FOP. In both models, death anxiety predicted a small but statistically significant unique variance in FCR and FOP. These findings draw attention to the importance of death anxiety in understanding FCR and FOP in people with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer. They also suggest that elements of exposure and existentialist therapies may be relevant in treating FCR and FOP.

Fear of cancer recurrence and mental health: A comprehensive meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the relationship between fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and symptoms of anxiety, depression, and emotional distress in cancer survivors. Additionally, potential effect modifiers of this link were investigated.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PsychInfo, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials until June 2022. Studies reporting the association between FCR and mental health indices in adolescent and young adult survivors (15-39 years) and adult survivors (>18 years) were included. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for cross-sectional studies.

RESULTS

A total of 72 primary studies with 31,740 participants were identified, with the majority having a low risk of bias. The results revealed a significant association between FCR and depression, anxiety, and emotional distress. This association was observed whether FCR was examined in relation to each factor individually or collectively. The effect sizes fell within the medium range. Notably, the relationship between FCR and mental health strengthened over the years of publication. Additionally, lengthier FCR assessment instruments yielded larger effect sizes compared to shorter and single-item instruments, underscoring the significance of instrument selection.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides further evidence that FCR is linked to a range of common mental health problems. The medium effect sizes observed indicate the need to consider FCR when evaluating the mental health of cancer survivors, and vice versa. Further research is required to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of the FCR-mental health link.

A qualitative exploration of patient perspectives on psychosocial burdens and positive factors in adults with osteogenesis imperfecta

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a pleiotropic, heritable connective tissue disorder associated with a wide range of health implications, including frequent bone fracture. While progress has been made to understand the spectrum of these physical health implications, the impact of OI on psychosocial well-being, as well as protective factors that buffer against adverse psychosocial outcomes, remain understudied. This present study relies on a qualitative approach to assess patient perspectives on both protective and adverse psychosocial factors specific to OI in 15 adults with varying disease status. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, subsequently coded, and themes extracted. Themes concerning psychosocial burdens (i.e., negative affective and behavioral impacts of disease status) and protective factors were identified from cooperatively-coded transcripts (two coders per transcript). Participants reported experiencing an increase in negative affect and disease-related distress after fracturing a bone and during recovery. Fear and concern specific to the uncertainty of future bone fractures and negative self-image was common. In contrast to these negative impacts, participants additionally described positive orientations toward their disease and attributed positive traits to their lived experience with a chronic disease. While limited due to small sample size and lack of ethno-racial diversity, findings highlight a need for continued research on the relationship between OI disease status and psychosocial outcomes, as well as the development of psychological interventions designed for OI populations. Findings have relevant clinical applications for healthcare providers working with those diagnosed with OI.

Cancer-Related Dysfunctional Beliefs About Sleep Mediate the Influence of Sleep Disturbance on Fear of Progression Among Patients With Surgically Resected Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is associated with significant psychological distress, including fear of progression (FoP). Because insomnia and depression are highly prevalent and associated with FoP, we examined the association between FoP, insomnia, and depression in cancer patients. Furthermore, we tested the mediation effect of cancer-related dysfunctional beliefs about sleep (C-DBS) on this association.

METHODS

We analyzed data collected from patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer from a single-center randomized controlled study investigating digital healthcare applications. Baseline demographic and clinical variables were collected. In addition, self-reported questionnaires including the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form, Patients Health Questionnaire-9 items (PHQ-9), Insomnia Severity Index, and C-DBS were administered.

RESULTS

Among the 320 enrolled patients with lung cancer, a regression model showed that FoP was predicted by age (β = -0.13, P = 0.007), PHQ-9 (β = 0.35, P < 0.001), and C-DBS (β = 0.28, P < 0.001). Insomnia did not directly influence FoP, but C-DBS mediated the association. Depression directly influenced FoP, but C-DBS did not mediate this association.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with surgically resected lung cancer, C-DBS mediated the effects of severity of insomnia on FoP. Depression directly influenced FoP, but C-DBS did not influence this association. To reduce FoP among patients with lung cancer, C-DBS should be addressed in the cognitive behavioral therapy module.

Psychometric validation of the fear of progression questionnaire-short form in acute pancreatitis patients

Introduction

Fear of progression (FoP) is associated with the quality of life and behavioral change in acute pancreatitis (AP) patients, but lack of assessment tools.

Aim

This study aimed to develop and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form in AP patients (AP-FoP-Q-SF).

Methods

Internal consistency, factorial structure, convergent validity, and criterion validity of AP-FoP-Q-SF were assessed. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify the cutoff value for high FoP. Associations between patient variables and FoP were evaluated using multiple logistic regression. Wilcox rank sum test was used to analyses the costs and length of hospital stay of the patients with high FoP.

Results

The two-factor structure showed a good fit. Internal consistency was acceptable (Cronbach's α = 0.771). The cutoff of 26 identified 35.3% of patients with high FoP. High FoP scores were associated with age (OR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.94-0.98), recurrence times (OR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.02-1.45) and anxiety (OR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.16-1.40). Patients with high FoP spent more cost and time in the hospital.

Conclusions

The AP-FoP-Q-SF is a good FoP tool for AP patients in China.

Implications for practice

Clinicians can use the AP-FoP-Q-SF to assess FoP and take promotion programs to avoid worse effects.

Stigma and related factors among renal dialysis patients in China

Background

Stigma is an important psychological concept that is being studied in many diseases. However, there have been few studies on stigma in renal dialysis patients in China. This study aimed to investigate the level of stigma and its potential influencing factors among Chinese renal dialysis patients.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among renal dialysis patients in two Chinese dialysis centers between April 2022 and July 2022. Two hundred four renal kidney patients were interviewed with a questionnaire on demographic variables using the Social Impact Scale (SIS), Resilience Scale-14 (RS-14), Herth Hope Index(HHI), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), Revised Life Orientation Test(LOT-R), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4) and Fear of Progression (FoP). T-test/univariate one-way ANOVA, Pearson's R, and hierarchical linear regression analysis were used to investigate the factors that influence stigma.

Results

Renal dialysis patients in China experienced a moderate level of stigma (52.36 ± 8.16). Stigma was negatively correlated with resilience, hope, and perceived social support, whereas it was positively associated with perceived stress and fear of progression. However, it showed no significant relationship between optimism and stigma. Hierarchical linear regression analysis showed that hope (β = -0.318, P < 0.001), social support (β = -0.193, P < 0.01), perceived stress (β = 0.197, P < 0.01), and fear of progression (β = 199, P < 0.01) were found to be associated with stigma among the renal dialysis patients. All four variables in the model could explain 34.6% of the variance in stigma among renal dialysis patients in China.

Conclusion

According to this study, renal dialysis patients in China face a moderate level of stigma. Stigma was found to be negatively related to hope and social support but positively associated with perceived stress and fear of progression. Future research on the stigma of renal dialysis patients should include hope-based interventions, proper and specific social support strategies, stress management interventions, and more disease-related information.

The effect of health literacy, self-efficacy, social support and fear of disease progression on the health-related quality of life of patients with cancer in China: a structural equation model

BACKGROUND

Health literacy (HL), self-efficacy (SE), social support (SS) and fear of disease progression (FOP) are all important factors affecting health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in cancer patients. However, their synergistic effects and underlying mechanisms on HRQoL in cancer patients remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to construct a structural equation model (SEM) to explore the underlying mechanism of factors affecting HRQoL. It is hoped that this study will provide a theoretical basis for future interventions.

METHODS

A cross-sectional design and convenience sampling method were used to investigate cancer inpatients in two general hospitals in Chongqing and Chengdu. Data were collected using structured scales, including HL, SE, SS, FOP and HRQoL. Finally, the SEM was constructed, and P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

There were 1749 participants included in this study. Correlation analysis showed that all variables were significantly correlated with one another except for symptoms, physical health (PD) and social family (SF) (p < 0.01). The SEM of the HRQoL had a good overall fit (GFI = 0.943, AGFI = 0.917, NFI = 0.950, RFI = 0.936, CFI = 0.955, IFI = 0.955, RMSEA = 0.072). The model indicated that HL had the strongest correlation with HRQoL (β = 0.398, p < 0.01), followed by FOP (β = -0.364, p < 0.01), SE (β = 0.347, p < 0.01) and SS (β = 0.184, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The HRQoL of cancer patients is correlated with HL, SS, SE and FOP. HL can directly affect HRQoL and mediate HRQoL through SS and SE. Future programs should consider HL promotion, SE improvement and SS expansion as the breakthrough point when designing targeted intervention strategies. At the same time, the importance of the impact of FOP on the HRQoL of patients with cancer should not be ignored.

Unmet Supportive Care Needs after Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Resection at a Tertiary Hospital in Seoul, South Korea

The aim of this study is to identify the prevalence and predictors of unmet needs of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing surgical resection in Seoul, South Korea. A total of 949 patients who completed survey questionnaires that included the Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs Korean version (CaSUN-K), fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) inventory-short form, and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) were recruited from January to October 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the potential correlation of significant unmet needs, defined as any moderate or strong need, for each domain of CaSUN-K. Of the 949 participants, the mean age was 63.4 ± 8.8 years old, and 529 (55.7%) were male. Overall, 91.8% of participants reported one or more unmet need. The highest domains of moderate-to-strong unmet needs were existential survivorship (59.1%), comprehensive cancer care (51.2%), and information (49.7%). High FCR and poor emotional function were associated with moderate-to-strong unmet needs across all domains of CaSUN-K. NSCLC survivors with a recent diagnosis had more frequent disease-related unmet needs. Interventions to reduce the unmet needs of NSCLC patients should focus on relieving FCR and improving emotional functioning. Furthermore, emphasis should be placed on decreasing disease-related needs, particularly for early survivors of lung cancer during the re-entry phase.

Fear of progression among postoperative patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer: a cross-sectional survey in China

BACKGROUND

More lung cancer cases are becoming diagnosed earlier in recent years. The diagnosis is often accompanied by fear of progression (FoP). There is a clear research gap in the existing literature on FoP and the most frequent concerns in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the status and factors related to FoP in newly diagnosed Chinese lung cancer patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung cancer resection.

METHODS

A cross-sectional design with convenience sampling was used in this study. Participants (N = 188) with newly diagnosed lung cancer (≤ 6 months) at one hospital in Zhengzhou were recruited. A demographic questionnaire, Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form, Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire, and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire were used to assess characteristics, FoP, social support, coping style, and patient illness perceptions. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with FoP.

RESULTS

The mean score of FoP was 35.39 ± 8.03. There are 56.4% of the patients (scores ≥ 34) have a clinically dysfunctional level of FoP. FoP was higher in young (18-39 years) than middle-aged patients (40-59 years) and elderly patients (≧60 years) (P = 0.004). Patients aged 40-59 years showed significantly higher fear of family-related concerns (P < 0.001), a fear of potential harm from medications (P = 0.001); Patients aged 18-39 years and 40-59 years showed significantly higher fears of work-related concerns (P = 0.012). Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that patients' age, the time from surgery and SSRS score were found to be independently associated with higher FoP.

CONCLUSIONS

High FoP is a frequently reported problem among newly diagnosed lung cancer patients, especially those less than 60 years old. Professional psychoeducation, psychological interventions, and personalized support are needed for patients with a high FoP.

Couples coping with advanced prostate cancer: an explorative study on decision-making preferences, self-efficacy and fear of progression

PURPOSE

To date, there is a lack of understanding of the treatment/disease-related health behaviors of patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa) and their spouses. The purpose of this study was to explore the characteristics of treatment decision-making (DM) preferences, general self-efficacy (SE) and fear of progression (FoP) among couples coping with advanced PCa.

METHODS

In this explorative study, 96 patients with advanced PCa and their spouses answered the multiple choice version of the Control Preferences Scale (CPS, regarding DM), General Self-Efficacy Short Scale (ASKU, regarding SE), and short form of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (FoP-Q-SF, regarding FoP). Corresponding questionnaires were employed for patients' spouses were evaluated, and correlations were subsequently drawn.

RESULTS

More than half of the patients (61%) and spouses (62%) preferred active DM. Collaborative DM was preferred by 25% of patients and 32% of spouses, and 14% of patients and 5% of spouses preferred passive DM. FoP was significantly higher among spouses than among patients (p < 0.001). The difference in SE was not significant between patients and spouses (p = 0.064). FoP and SE negatively correlated among patients (r = - 0.42; p < 0.001) and among spouses (r = - 0.46; p < 0.001). DM preference did not correlate with SE and FoP.

CONCLUSIONS

High FoP and low general SE are related among both patients with advanced PCa and their spouses. FoP seems to be higher among female spouses than among patients. Couples seem to be largely in agreement when it comes to playing an active role in treatment DM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.germanctr.de , number DRKS 00013045.

Illness perceptions, fear of progression and health-related quality of life during acute treatment and follow-up care in paediatric cancer patients and their parents: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

This study examines the role of illness perceptions and fear of progression (FoP) in paediatric cancer patients and their parents for patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), controlling for sociodemographic and medical variables. 4-18-year-old patients in acute treatment or follow-up care and one parent were examined.

METHODS

N = 46 patient-parent dyads in acute treatment and n = 84 dyads in follow-up care completed measures on illness perceptions (Illness-Perceptions-Questionnaire for 12-18-year-old patients and parents or as age-adapted puppet interview for 4-11-year-old patients) and FoP (Fear-of-Progression-Questionnaire for 7-18-year-old patients and parents). Patients also completed the KINDL-R to measure HRQoL. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were calculated.

RESULTS

In acute treatment, patient's perceptions of symptoms and cyclicity of their illness explained variation in their HRQoL in addition to sociodemographic and medical variables. In follow-up care, patient's FoP and parent's perception of consequences explained additional variation in patient's HRQoL. Overall, sociodemographic and medical variables explained less variation in HRQoL in follow-up care than in acute treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results stress the importance of psychological factors for the well-being of paediatric cancer patients, particularly in follow-up care, where sociodemographic and medical variables play a lesser role. We recommend screening for illness perceptions and FoP during and after acute treatment to support patients and parents. Furthermore, standardized interventions focussed on changing maladaptive illness perceptions should be developed and evaluated. As parents' perceptions, thoughts, and feelings may also play an important role for the well-being of the patients, interventions should be family-focussed and include parents. Trial registration The study has been pre-registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (registered 30/06/2020; DRKS00022034) and at the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/3uwrx ).

Which type of fear of cancer progression contributes to the quality of life of Romanian cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic?

Introduction

Fear of cancer progression (FoP) is one of the most frequently reported unmet needs invoked by the majority of cancer patients, which may significantly impair the quality of life (QoL) of patients. The major objective of the present cross-sectional study was to investigate the specificities of the relationship between different dimensions and intensity of FoP and different aspects of patients' QoL during the COVID-19 pandemic in Romania.

Methods

A nationwide sample of 330 participants completed a survey, including measures of demographic characteristics, medical variables, QoL, and FoP. Multivariate General Linear and Hierarchical Regression Models were conducted in order to assess the relationship between variables.

Result

Our results indicate that less than a quarter of the sample experienced low, between 63 and 70% moderate, and 15% high levels of FoP. Our results also indicate that anxiety/worry related to the possibility of progression of the disease, and loss of independence produced significant differences with large effect sizes in all the dimensions of QoL.

Discussion

Our results indicate that besides affective reactions, the fear of cancer survivors to lose independence, not being able to attend to their own lives, seems to be a considerable threat, especially in the context of Romanian health system which has difficulties in offering qualitative psychosocial care for cancer patients. The idea that patients will have to rely on others and may not function well independently, not being able to attend to their own lives, seems to be a considerable threat, next to the experienced affective reactions per se.

Predictors of fear of diabetes progression: A multi-center cross-sectional study for patients self-management and healthcare professions education

Objective

Excessive fear of progression can affect the mental health, social function, and wellbeing of patients with chronic diseases. This study investigated the fear of progression (FoP) and the socio-demographic and clinical predictors among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Method

The present study is a multi-center cross-sectional study. Inpatients with T2DM were recruited by a multi-stage convenience sampling method from the department of endocrinology in 5 tertiary hospitals in Southwest China. 459 T2DM patients were consecutively enrolled. Socio-demographic, clinical data, and answers to the fear of progression questionnaire (FoP-Q) were collected.

Results

385 patients with complete data were eligible. The average score of FoP-Q-SF was 26.84 and 23.1% of patients reached the dysfunctional fear of progression criterion. The greatest fears were worrying about "disease progression," "the adverse reactions of medication," and "relying on strangers for activities of daily living." Health education (P < 0.001), age (P = 0.002), hypoglycemia history (P = 0.006), employment status (P = 0.025) and duration since being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (P = 0.032) were the related factors of fear of progression.

Conclusion

Early assessment of the fear of progression was imperative to identify dysfunctional fear of progression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Meanwhile, the meaning of these predictors for strengthening healthcare professions education and patients self-management might help healthcare givers timely perform related interventions and help patients reduce their fear of progression thus actively cooperate with T2DM treatments.

Fear of Progression is Determined by Anxiety and Self-Efficacy but not Disease-Specific Parameters in Patients with Parkinson's Disease: Preliminary Data from a Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Fear of progression (FoP) is a reactive, conscious concern about chronic disease progression and its consequences which may limit quality of life substantially. Only one study has examined FoP in Parkinson's disease (PD), showing the second highest FoP scores among chronic diseases.

OBJECTIVE

To examine FoP prevalence and to exploratorily analyze determinants of FoP in PD.

METHODS

Within a multicenter cross-sectional study, 120 PD inpatients (age: 64.45±9.20; 60.8% male; UPDRS-III: 28.86±16.12) were examined with the FoP questionnaire (FoP-Q; max. 20 points). Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis examined sociodemographic, clinical, and (neuro-) psychological determinants of FoP.

RESULTS

With a mean FoP-Q score of 8.08±2.17, 63.0% of the patients were classified with moderate FoP and 17.6% with dysfunctional (i.e., severe) FoP. The highest scores were shown for the subscale 'loss of autonomy'. Increased levels of anxiety, less self-efficacy, female gender, current employment, and lower health literacy were identified as significant determinants associated with FoP.

CONCLUSION

With more than 80% of patients showing moderate to dysfunctional FoP, it must be regarded as a frequent symptom in PD, which needs to be further understood and addressed in clinical practice. Clinical parameters like PD duration and severity were no determinants for FoP, indicating that FoP awareness must be considered by professionals at all disease stages.

Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF) in Portuguese Cancer Survivors

In 2020, around 60,000 people were diagnosed with cancer in Portugal, and many of them suffered some level of Fear of Progression (FoP) of the disease. Although this FoP is realistic, and is part of the normal and appropriate response to this type of disease, there is no instrument to assess and understand whether it is exaggerated in the face of the situation. The present study aimed to translate and validate the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF) for the Portuguese population. The sample consisted of 220 volunteers, aged 18 years or over and diagnosed with cancer for at least six months. Participants completed the FoP-Q-SF, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C). The FoP-Q-SF demonstrated high internal reliability (α = 0.86) and the confirmatory factor analysis supported the one-dimensional structure of the FoP-Q-SF. Convergent validity was supported with significant positive correlations with psychological distress, especially anxiety (0.68). The FoP-Q-SF has been found to be a valid instrument to measure FoP in Portuguese cancer survivors.

Fear of cancer recurrence and hope level in patients receiving surgery for non-small cell lung cancer: a study on the mediating role of social support

PURPOSE

To study the level of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in patients receiving surgery for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and explore related factors that can increase levels of hope in this population, enhance the confidence to defeat the disease, and thus increase the quality of life.

METHODS

A total of 327 postoperative NSCLC patients from the National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College were enrolled. All participants completed the General Questionnaire, Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF), Herth Hope Index (HHI) Scale, and Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS).

RESULTS

The mean FoP-Q-SF score was (30.3 ± 9.48) points in postoperative NSCLC patients, Among them, there were 188 patients (57.5%) who had psychological dysfunction, indicated by a score of > / = 34. Patient sex and family income were independent risk factors for FCR (both p < 0.05). Correlation analysis revealed a negative association between FCR and hope level (p < 0.05) and a positive association between hope level and social support (p < 0.05). Notably, social support mediated the association between FCR and hope in patients receiving surgery for NSCLC (contribution effect: 30.24%).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative NSCLC patients experience a moderate level of FCR, especially females and those with a low family income. Social support partially mediates the relationship between FCR and hope in this population. Therefore, an increase in the level of social support can increase hope among these patients and advancing recovery.

The fear of cancer recurrence and progression in patients with pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

It is plausible that patients with pancreatic cancer experience fear of tumor recurrence or progression (FOP). The aim of this study was to compare FOP in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with surgical resection, palliative systemic treatment, or best supportive care (BSC) and analyze the association between quality of life (QoL) and FOP and the effect of FOP on overall survival (OS).

METHODS

This study included patients diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between 2015 and 2018, who participated in the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Project (PACAP). The association between QoL and WOPS was assessed with logistic regression analyses. OS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves with the log-rank tests and multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses adjusted for clinical covariates and QoL.

RESULTS

Of 315 included patients, 111 patients underwent surgical resection, 138 received palliative systemic treatment, and 66 received BSC. Patients who underwent surgical resection had significantly lower WOPS scores (i.e., less FOP) at initial diagnosis compared to patients who received palliative systemic treatment or BSC only (P < 0.001). Better QoL was independently associated with the probability of having a low FOP in the BSC (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.98) but not in the surgical resection (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-1.01) and palliative systemic treatment groups (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-1.00). The baseline WOPS score was not independently associated with OS in any of the subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Given the distress that FOP evokes, FOP should be explicitly addressed by health care providers when guiding pancreatic cancer patients through their treatment trajectory, especially those receiving palliative treatment or BSC.

Prognostic impact of waiting time between diagnosis and treatment in patients with cervical cancer: A nationwide population-based study

OBJECTIVE

Prior research underlined the importance of timely oncological care as longer waiting times from diagnosis to treatment may result in poorer survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of waiting time from diagnosis to treatment on overall survival (OS) in patients with cervical cancer treated with curative intent.

METHODS

Patients from a nationwide population-based cohort with newly diagnosed cervical cancer between 2010 and 2019 were studied. Patients who underwent surgery or (chemo)radiotherapy with curative intent were selected. Waiting time (i.e. interval between first pathologic confirmation and treatment) was modelled as continuous (i.e. linear per week), dichotomized (i.e. ≤8 versus >8 weeks), and polynomial (i.e. restricted cubic splines). The association with OS was examined using Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among 6895 patients with cervical cancer, 2755 treated with primary surgery and 1898 who received primary (chemo)radiotherapy were included. Mean waiting time was 8.5 (±4.2) weeks to surgery and 7.7 (±2.9) weeks to (chemo)radiotherapy. Adjusted for confounders, waiting time to surgery was not significantly associated with OS (continuous HR 0.97 [95%CI: 0.93-1.01], dichotomized HR 0.93 [95%CI: 0.68-1.27], polynomial HR not significant). Similarly, a longer waiting time to (chemo)radiotherapy was not significantly associated with poorer OS (continuous HR 0.97 [95%CI: 0.93-1.00], dichotomized HR 0.91 [95%CI: 0.75-1.09], polynomial HR not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

This large population-based study demonstrates that a longer waiting time (of up to 12 weeks) from diagnosis to treatment in patients with cervical cancer treated with curatively intended surgery or (chemo)radiotherapy does not negatively impact survival.

The intrapersonal and interpersonal processes of fear of recurrence among cervical cancer survivors: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

Cervical cancer's emotional and mental toll often extends beyond the disease's duration. Fear of cancer recurrence has been identified as prominent in patients and survivors, yet there is a paucity of studies regarding this population. The present study sought to explore and expand the understanding of the meaning of fear of cancer recurrence among cervical cancer survivors.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 cervical cancer survivors. The interviewees' mean age was 41.33 years (range 34-47 years), and the mean time since diagnosis was 3.1 years (ranged from 0.5 to 7 years).

RESULTS

Three central themes emerged that represent intrapersonal and interpersonal processes: The first, "No longer resilient" refers to feelings of uncertainty in the face of the illness experienced on the intrapersonal level, where the interviewee mostly engaged with efforts to return to the "normal" state that existed before the cancer diagnosis. The second, "To be afraid in a dyad," relates to the interpersonal level that included mutual fears shared by the interviewee and her partner. The third "And what if the disease comes back and I die?" represents a combination of intrapersonal and interpersonal processes manifested by the greatest fear - death - expressed by both the interviewee and her partner.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings revealed that the fear of cancer recurrence represents intrapersonal and interpersonal processes encompassing three factors - uncertainty, social-cognitive processing, and death anxiety. Accordingly, potential psycho-social treatment options could be tailored to specifically address the prominence of these factors for cervical cancer survivors.

Fear of Progression in chronic illnesses other than cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a transdiagnostic construct

Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is the most common psychosocial issue amongst cancer survivors. However, fear of progression (FoP) has been studied outside of the cancer context. This review aimed to: (1) meta-synthesize qualitative studies of FoP in illnesses other than cancer; and (2) quantify the relationship between FoP and anxiety, depression, and quality of life (QoL) in non-cancer chronic illnesses. We identified 25 qualitative and 11 quantitative studies in a range of chronic illnesses. Participants described fears of progression and recurrence of their illness, including fears of dying, and fears of becoming a burden to family. Fears were often triggered by downward comparison (i.e. seeing people worse off than themselves). Participants coped in different ways, including by accepting the illness or seeking knowledge. Those for whom these fears caused distress reported hypervigilance to physical symptoms and avoidance. Distress, and seeking information, were associated with adherence. In quantitative analyses, FoP was moderately associated with QoL, and strongly associated with anxiety and depression. These results suggest that FoP in illnesses other than cancer is similar to FCR. FoP appears to be an important transdiagnostic construct associated with distress. Evidence-based FCR interventions could be adapted to better manage FoP in other illnesses.

An Investigation of Fear of Recurrence, Attachment and Caregiving Experiences among Ovarian Cancer Partner-Caregivers

OBJECTIVES

Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a common concern for both cancer patients and their caregivers. Attachment insecurity is an established contributor to poorer mental health, particularly as it relates to social support. This study sought to evaluate whether attachment and caregiver experiences in cancer care were predictors of FCR.

METHODS

A cross-sectional questionnaire study involving partner-caregivers of patients with ovarian cancer was conducted. Correlation analyses and multiple hierarchical regressions were used to determine the roles of attachment and caregiving experiences in cancer care on FCR, including the possible moderating role of attachment on the relationship between caregiving experiences and FCR.

RESULTS

Participants (n=82) mostly identified as white men, had post-secondary education and incomes of over $100,000 CAD, and cared for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Forty percent of participants had clinically elevated FCR. Among the evaluated caregiving experiences in cancer care, caregiving workload (r=0.33; p=0.005), needing more help from healthcare providers (r=0.28; p=0.02), and lacking time for social relations because of caregiving (r=0.47; p<0.001) correlated with FCR. Attachment anxiety correlated significantly with FCR (r=0.43; p<0.001), but attachment avoidance did not. Attachment anxiety (ΔR² =0.14; p=0.002) and lacking time for social relations (ΔR² =0.18; p<0.001) contributed to the variance on FCR. Attachment insecurity did not moderate the relationships between caregiving experiences and FCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Partner-caregiver attachment anxiety correlates with FCR however this does not influence FCR's relationship with poorer perceived support from cancer care institutions. Partner-caregivers may benefit from psychotherapies for FCR and more practical support from cancer care teams. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Social inequalities in health anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The association between a low socioeconomic status and poor health, also known as social inequalities in health, has been shown in numerous studies. This also applies to most mental illnesses, such as somatization or anxiety disorders. It is unclear, however, whether social inequalities are evident in health anxiety as well. Therefore, this review and meta-analysis systematically examines social inequalities in health anxiety.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted covering all studies published until August 2021. The databases PubMED, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and PSYNDEX were screened to identify quantitative studies using validated tools to measure health anxiety and examining the association with socioeconomic status. Meta-analytic methods were applied by using random-effect models. The study quality was assessed with the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool.

RESULTS

Overall, 37 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Effect sizes of 27 studies using screening scales and 10 studies using diagnostic interviews to measure health anxiety were calculated separately. Meta-analyses revealed a significant association between socioeconomic status and health anxiety (r - 0.14, 95%-CI -0.18 to -0.09 (screening scales) and OR 0.63, 95%-CI 0.43 to 0.92 (diagnostic interviews)), indicating a lower risk for health anxiety in people with higher socioeconomic status.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that the health-related disadvantage of socially deprived people is also evident regarding health anxiety. This should be considered in programs to reduce social inequalities in health. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021237550.

Prospective longitudinal study on fear of cancer recurrence in patients newly diagnosed with head and neck cancer: Course, trajectories, and associated factors

Background

This study assessed the course of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in patients newly diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC), identified FCR trajectories and factors associated with FCR trajectories.

Methods

Six hundred and seventeen HNC patients from the NET‐QUBIC cohort study completed the Cancer Worry Scale‐6 at diagnosis, 3 and 6 months post‐treatment. FCR trajectories were identified using Latent Class Growth Analysis. Associations were explored between FCR trajectories and baseline demographic and medical variables, coping and self‐efficacy.

Results

Overall, FCR decreased slightly between baseline and 3 months post‐treatment and remained stable up to 6 months. Two FCR trajectories were identified: “high stable” (n = 125) and “low declining” (n = 492). Patients with high stable FCR were younger, reported more negative adjustment, passive coping, and reassuring thoughts, and less avoidance.

Conclusions

The majority of HNC patients have low declining FCR after diagnosis, but one in five patients experience persistent high FCR up to 6 months post‐treatment.

Fear-focused Self-compassion Therapy for young breast cancer patients' fear of cancer recurrence: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In China, there are a growing number of young women being diagnosed with breast cancer. Fear of Cancer Recurrence (FCR) has become one of the major psychological concerns reported by young breast cancer patients. Yet, there is a lack of psychological intervention tailored for reducing FCR for Chinese young breast cancer patients. In the current study, the Fear-focused Self-compassion Therapy is developed to help Chinese young breast cancer patients to manage FCR. The therapy was developed based on FCR development theories and self-compassion related therapy. The primary objective is to evaluate the short-term and long-term effectiveness of Fear-focused Self-compassion Therapy. The secondary objective is to examine the underlying mechanisms of therapy in reducing FCR in young breast cancer patients.

METHODS

The Fear-focused Self-compassion Therapy consists of 8-week face to face group sessions. This study will be a randomized controlled trial with 160 Chinese young female breast cancer patients with severe FCR. Participants will be randomized to the therapy group or a usual care control group (1:1). Measurements will be completed at baseline, immediately completing intervention, 3, 6, and 12 months later. Primary outcomes are FCR severity, and secondary outcomes include symptoms of depression and anxiety, satisfaction with therapy, and cost-effectiveness of the therapy.

DISCUSSION

If successful, this study will provide an effective psychological intervention to treat FCR for young breast cancer patients in China, and illuminate the underlying mechanisms of the Fear-focused Self-compassion Therapy in reducing FCR.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04965428. Registered 23rd July 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04965428?cond=fear+of+cancer+recurrence&draw=2&rank=1.

Fear of Progression, Anxiety, and Depression in Patients With Advanced Melanoma in the COVID-19 and Post-COVID-19 Era

BACKGROUND

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic causes great disruption to cancer care services, which might bring about psychological problems and further lower both physical and mental life quality in cancer patients. Until now, very few studies focused on the psychological distress of patients with advanced melanoma before or during the epidemic. This study aimed to elucidate the fear of progression (FoP), anxiety, depression, and related independent predictors in patients with advanced melanoma during the COVID-19 outbreak.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-three patients with unresectable stage III or metastatic melanoma were recruited from February 2020 to November 2021, and completed the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF), State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-6), and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-four (64.7%) patients experienced heighted FoP (FoP-Q-SF: 39.9 ± 11.0), 198 (72.5%) patients reported elevated anxiety (STAI-6: 13.1 ± 3.0), and 62 (22.7%) patients had increased depression (PHQ-9: 6.4 ± 6.1). In multivariate analysis, illness duration (OR = 0.987 for FoP; OR = 0.984 for depression), cancer stage (OR = 14.394 for anxiety) and disease progression (OR = 1.960 for FoP; OR = 23.235 for anxiety; OR = 1.930 for depression) were independent predictors for FoP, anxiety or depression. Additionally, the high levels of FoP, anxiety and depression were significantly positive correlated with each other (r = 0.466 for FoP and anxiety; r = 0.382 for FoP and depression; r = 0.309 for anxiety and depression).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that FoP, anxiety and depression are persisting among patients with advanced melanoma in the COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 era. Effective psycho-oncological interventions are needed for melanoma patients with psychological distress during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

Evidence of psychological and biological effects of structured Mindfulness-Based Interventions for cancer patients and survivors: A meta-review

OBJECTIVE

A large number of studies have been conducted exploring the effects of mindfulness programs on health outcomes, such as psychological and biological outcomes. However, there is substantial heterogeneity among studies and, consequently, in the systematic reviews/meta-analyses. Since clinical practice is massively informed by evidence on review studies, our main objective was to summarize the reported evidence regarding the effects of structured mindfulness-based programs on psychological, biological, and quality-of-life outcomes in cancer patients.

METHODS

We conducted a meta-review, using a literature search from inception to June 2020 in several electronic databases using a combination of keywords including MBSR, MBCT, cancer, and meta-analysis OR "systematic review" (PROSPERO registration CRD42020186511).

RESULTS

Ten studies met the eligibility criteria and were included. The main findings were beneficial small to medium effect sizes of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR)/Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT)/Mindfulness-Based Cancer Recovery (MBCR) on psychological health, such as anxiety, depression, stress, and quality of life. A beneficial effect was found for biological outcomes, albeit based on a reduced number of studies. Studies were moderate homogenous regarding the intervention, population, and outcomes explored. Results on long-term follow-up seem to indicate that the effects tend not to be maintained, namely in shorter follow-ups (6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-review brings a broad perspective on the actual evidence regarding MBSR/MBCT/MBCR. We expect to contribute to future project design, focused on developing high-quality studies and exploring the moderating effects that might contribute to biased results, as well as exploring who might benefit more from MBSR/MBCT/MBCT interventions.

Fear of Cancer Recurrence and Death Anxiety: Unaddressed Concerns for Adult Neuro-oncology Patients

Primary brain tumor (PBT) patients may experience existential distress; however, few studies have examined this issue. The objectives of this study were to (1) systematically review PBT representation in psycho-oncology literature regarding fear/anxiety related to progression, recurrence, and death and (2) preliminarily assess the prevalence of fear of dying in a sample of PBT patients. Systematic searching of three databases yielded 1555 articles for review. Of these, 327 studies met inclusion criteria (patient sample N = 132,951). Only eight studies (0.18% of the participants) included patients with a PBT diagnosis, potentially due to exclusion criteria such as cognitive impairment or specific treatment parameters which may prohibit PBT patient participation. Review of the results from the eight included studies revealed mixed methods and limited demographic analyses; existential distress was correlated with heightened depression and anxiety, and overall worsened quality of life. From the original data collection, approximately one-third of PBT patients endorsed fear of dying, which was positively related to depression severity. Taken together, results suggest that PBT patients are considerably underrepresented in existential psycho-oncology literature, despite preliminary findings suggesting prevalence of these concerns. Future research on existential distress in neuro-oncology is warranted.

OVPSYCH2: A randomized controlled trial of psychological support versus standard of care following chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Fear of disease progression (FOP) is a rational concern for women with Ovarian Cancer (OC) and depression is also common. To date there have been no randomized trials assessing the impact of psychological intervention on depression and FOP in this patient group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with primary or recurrent OC who had recently completed chemotherapy were eligible if they scored between 5 and 19 on the PHQ-9 depression and were randomized 1:1 to Intervention (3 standardized CBT-based sessions in the 6-12 weeks post-chemotherapy) or Control (standard of care). PHQ-9, FOP-Q-SF, EORTC QLQ C30 and OV28 questionnaires were then completed every 3 months for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was change in PHQ-9 at 3 months. Secondary endpoints were change in other scores at 3 months and all scores at later timepoints.

RESULTS

182 patients registered; 107 were randomized; 54 to Intervention and 53 to Control; mean age 59 years; 75 (70%) had completed chemotherapy for primary and 32 (30%) for relapsed OC and 67 patients completed both baseline and 3-month questionnaires. Improvement in PHQ-9 was observed for patients in both study arms at three months compared to baseline but there was no significant difference in change between Intervention and Control. A significant improvement on FOP-Q-SF scores was seen in the Intervention arm, whereas for those in the Control arm FOP-Q-SF scores deteriorated at 3 months (intervention effect = -4.4 (-7.57, -1.22), p-value = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

CBT-based psychological support provided after chemotherapy did not significantly alter the spontaneously improving trajectory of depression scores at three months but caused a significant improvement in FOP. Our findings call for the routine implementation of FOP support for ovarian cancer patients.

Is patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences associated with their fear of progression?

PURPOSE

Previous studies found that some breast cancer patients in Germany are invited to participate in a multidisciplinary tumor conference (MTC) during the discussion of their own case. MTCs are regular meetings of a treatment team in which the diagnosis and treatment plan of cancer patients are discussed. Psychological consequences concerning the patients' participation in an MTC have not been examined yet. This study examines the association between patients' participation in MTC and patients' fear of progression (FoP).

METHODS

This analysis is part of a larger project named "Patient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferences in Breast Cancer Care" (PINTU) which is a multicenter observational mixed-methods study. The study was conducted in six breast and gynecological cancer centers in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. Data were collected from 2018 to 2020 by patient survey at three time points. Patients with (n = 81) and without (n = 120) MTC participation were compared. FoP was measured with a 12-item short form of the FoP Questionnaire (FoP-Q-SF) at all three measurement time points. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, a one-way repeated variance analysis (ANOVA), and a one-way repeated ANCOVA using the propensity score as a covariate.

RESULTS

Data of n = 201 patients were included in the analysis. In general, FoP scores decreased in both groups from T0 to T2 (F = 36.539, p < 0.001, η²  = 0.155). Non-participating patients did not differ with regard to their FoP from patients who participated in an MTC before and after participation. The results of AN(C)OVA revealed no significant effects concerning the influence of patient participation in an MTC on FoP (F = 0.014, p = 0.907, η² = <0.001 and (F = 0.013, p = 0.909, η² = <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Since the FoP is not influenced by participation, the findings do not support recommendations for or against patient participation in an MTC. Further research should focus on the question of which patient groups might benefit from participation in an MTC with regard to which outcome variables.

Rapid screener for the assessment of fear of progression in cancer survivors: The Fear of progression-Questionnaire Rapid Screener

OBJECTIVES

Fear of progression (FoP) among cancer survivors can adversely affect all areas of life. Existing instruments are too long for implementation in routine care. Therefore, we developed and tested a rapid screener for FoP (FoP-Q-RS).

METHODS

Data were derived from a register-based study among cancer survivors. The 12-item short form of the Fear-of-Progression Questionnaire (FoP-Q-SF) served as item-pool. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was applied to determine (a) fit indices including comparative fit index (CFI) and standardised root mean square residual (SRMR) and (b) measures of reliability including composite reliability (CR). Fit indices were compared to the FoP-Q-SF. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to recommend a cut-off (criterion: GAD-7 score ≥10).

RESULTS

One thousand two cancer survivors participated (response rate: 53%). We selected five items for the FoP-Q-RS. CFA indicated acceptable fit (CFI = 0.936; SRMR = 0.048) and reliability (CR = 0.793). Fit indices were better than for the FoP-Q-SF. The cut-off ≥12 showed optimal balance between sensitivity (72%) and specificity (70%), the cut-off ≥10 revealed higher sensitivity (86%) with still tolerable specificity (52%).

CONCLUSION

The FoP-Q-RS shows good psychometric properties and may be applied in routine care. Further studies on preferable cut-offs and other populations are needed.

Fear of disease progression and relevant correlates in acute leukemia patients prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), and despite the high objective risks associated with HSCT, fear of progression (FoP) has only sparsely been studied in patients with acute leukemia until now. The aim of this study was the assessment of the prevalence of FoP, and any relevant correlates and typical concerns.

METHODS

We included 59 adult patients with acute leukemia who were tested prior to their first HSCT during an in-patient stay. Patients completed self-report measures assessing FoP (Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form, FoP-Q-SF) and relevant correlates of FoP (eg, patients' physical state, depression, psychosocial distress, or social support).

RESULTS

About one third of the patients (35.6%; n = 21) had high FoP. Higher FoP was associated with previous cancer diagnosis, as well as depression, anxiety, reduced physical functioning, lower mental health-related quality of life, and lower positive social support. The greatest fears reported by these patients reflected common fears of cancer patients (eg, fear about leaving their families behind), but also specific fears related to the current situation (eg, fear of severe medical treatments during the course of the illness).

CONCLUSIONS

This was the first study providing an extensive analysis of FoP in leukemia patients prior to the extreme situation of HSCT. FoP is frequent and of major clinical importance for these patients. Hence, we recommend that patients undergo routine screening for FoP, to identify highly distressed patients at an early stage, and to offer targeted support.

Validation of the English and simplified Mandarin versions of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire - Short Form in Chinese cancer survivors

BACKGROUND

The fear of illness progression is common amongst those with chronic illnesses including cancers, and contributes to high psychological morbidity. Research in Asia on such fears however, is limited by a paucity of validated measurement instruments. Amongst the many available instruments, the Fear of Progression Questionnaire has a high quality rating, an important consideration in its selection. This study developed a simplified Mandarin version of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire - Short Form (FoP-Q-SF), and validated the English and Mandarin versions for use in Chinese populations.

METHODS

The translation to a simplified Mandarin version was through a forward-backward translation with emphasis on conceptual and cultural equivalence. Cancer survivors (N = 341) completed a self-report questionnaire, the Fear of Progression Questionnaire - Short Form, other measures of fear of progression, depression, anxiety, and quality of life. Reliability and criterion validity were assessed, and the factor-structure was replicated with a confirmatory factor analysis.

RESULTS

The Fear of Progression Questionnaire - Short Form demonstrated high internal and test-retest reliability. Criterion validity was also demonstrated through convergent, concurrent and discriminant validity. The factor structure was supported and replicated. The goodness-of-fit indices of the original model indicated some misfit, which could be adequately addressed by freeing five parameters in the error covariance matrix, without changing the one-factor structure.

CONCLUSIONS

The Fear of Progression Questionnaire - Short Form is a reliable and valid measure of fear of progression applicable to a mixed-cancer survivor population in Singapore. The simplified Mandarin version of the questionnaire will be useful in other parts of Asia and for Chinese migrants in the West, further extending the use of this questionnaire.

Fear of cancer recurrence in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: A systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVE

The current systematic review aims to provide an overview of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (15-39 years at cancer diagnosis, AYAs).

METHODS

MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase databases were independently searched to identify relevant quantitative articles. PRISMA systematic review procedures were followed with quality assessment.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included in the current review. All were quantitative studies that utilized a cross-sectional study design. Seven articles reported results of FCR prevalence, six studied determinants related to FCR, and 11 articles provided information about consequences of FCR. Prevalence of FCR ranged from 31% to 85.2% among AYA survivors. Associations between sociodemographic/clinical variables and FCR were inconsistent. Psychological distress and higher treatment intensity were positively associated with higher FCR levels. Lower scores on levels of physical, psychological functioning, and overall health-related quality of life (QoL) were identified as consequences of increased FCR.

CONCLUSION

FCR appears to be a prevalent concern among adolescent and young adult cancer populations. Adequate assessment to determine need for support and intervention is still required. Longitudinal studies in AYAs are warranted to understand the development and potential influence of FCR. Age-appropriate and flexible psychological care would be more successful potentially with this crucial background information.

Fear of disease progression in adult ambulatory patients with brain cancer: prevalence and clinical correlates

BACKGROUND

Fear of progression (FoP) is frequent in patients with cancer and of high clinical relevance. Despite the often devastating prognosis of brain cancer, FoP has not yet been assessed in neurooncological patients.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was thus the assessment of FoP and its clinical correlates.

METHODS

In an ambulatory setting, 42 patients with a primary brain tumour completed the Fear of Progression questionnaire FoP-Q-12. Clinical correlates of FoP were assessed via a variety of measures, including patients' physical state (Karnofsky Performance Status, KPS), cancer-related psychosocial distress (Distress Thermometer, DT), anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder Scale, GAD-7), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire, PHQ-9), Quality of Life (Short Form Health Survey, SF-8), and unmet supportive care needs (Supportive Care Needs Survey, SCNS).

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (42%) suffered from high FoP (i.e. scored ≥ 34 in the FoP-Q-12). According to the 12 items of the FoP-Q-12, the greatest fears were worrying about what would happen to their family and being afraid of severe medical treatments. No sociodemographic variables (e.g. age, gender) or medical tumour characteristics (e.g. tumour malignancy, first or recurrent tumour) were related to FoP. Patients with more severe physical symptoms reported higher FoP. Patients with higher FoP were more anxious, more depressed, reported lower Quality of Life, and suffered from more unmet supportive care needs.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that FoP is frequent and of high clinical relevance for neurooncological patients. Its assessment is not sufficiently covered by instruments for assessment of other areas of psychological morbidity (e.g. general anxiety). Moreover, FoP cannot be predicted by objective characteristics of the patients and disease. Thus, the routine screening for FoP is recommended in neurooncological patients. Clinicians should bear in mind that patients with high FoP are likely to suffer from high emotional distress and unmet supportive care needs and initiate treatment accordingly.

Fear of cancer recurrence, anxiety and depressive symptoms in adolescent and young adult cancer patients

Background: Previous studies have indicated that younger age is consistently associated with high levels of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), anxiety and depression. However, the associations among these variables in adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients are not clear. This study explores the prevalence and correlates of FCR, anxiety and depressive symptoms in Chinese AYA cancer population. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that includes 249 patients aged between 15 and 39 yrs at the time of cancer diagnosis. Patient's sociodemographic, clinical as well as psychological characteristics were collected by an information sheet, the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form (FoP-Q-SF), General Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Descriptive statistics and multivariate analyses were conducted. Results: Eighty-nine (35.74%) patients experienced dysfunctional level of FCR, eighty-two (32.93%) patients experienced anxiety symptoms and ninety-six (38.55%) reported depressive symptoms. In multivariate analyses, being single, pessimistic, having more concurrent stressful life events and physical comorbidity were independently associated with higher FCR, anxiety and depressive symptoms. Patients who were not engaging in radiotherapy were more likely to report higher anxiety level. Conclusion: FCR, anxiety and depressive symptoms are frequently reported problems among AYA cancer patients. Age-appropriate and flexible psychological interventions are needed for this high-risk population.

Fear of cancer recurrence: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis of patients' experiences

Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a significant issue for most cancer survivors, with nearly half of cancer survivors reporting it at moderate to high levels of intensity. We aimed to further explore the experience of having FCR from the point of view of patients by systematically reviewing qualitative studies. Following PRISMA guidelines, 87 qualitative studies were selected. All participants' quotes about FRC were extracted, then analysed using a conceptual framework based on the emotion-focused therapy theory of emotion schemes, which consist of experienced/implicit emotions, along with perceptual-situational, bodily-expressive, symbolic-conceptual and motivational-behavioral elements. According to participant descriptions, FCR was found to be an intense, difficult, multi-dimensional experience. Considering the diversity of experiences identified, it is useful to look at FCR as an emotional experience that extends along a continuum of adaptive and maladaptive responses. For some participants, FCR was described in trauma-like terms, including forms of re-experiencing, avoidance, negative thoughts and feelings, and arousal or reactivity related to cancer-related triggers or memories. Vivid metaphors expressing vulnerability and conflict also reflect the strong impact of FCR in patients' lives and can help therapists empathize with their clients.