Organization of the Spinothalamic Tract as a Relay for Cardiopulmonary Sympathetic Afferent Fiber Activity

[Neurobiology of visceral pain]

Visceral pain is diffusely localized, referred into other tissues, frequently not correlated with visceral traumata, preferentially accompanied by autonomic and somatomotor reflexes, and associated with strong negative affective feelings. It belongs together with the somatic pain sensations and non-painful body sensations to the interoception of the body. (1) Visceral pain is correlated with the excitation of spinal (thoracolumbar, sacral) visceral afferents and (with a few exceptions) not with the excitation of vagal afferents. Spinal visceral afferents are polymodal and activated by adequate mechanical and chemical stimuli. All groups of spinal visceral afferents can be sensitized (e.g., by inflammation). Silent mechanoinsensitive spinal visceral afferents are recruited by inflammation. (2) Spinal visceral afferent neurons project into the laminae I, II (outer part IIo) and V of the spinal dorsal horn over several segments, medio-lateral over the whole width of the dorsal horn and contralateral. Their activity is synaptically transmitted in laminae I, IIo and deeper laminae to viscero-somatic convergent neurons that receive additionally afferent synaptic (mostly nociceptive) input from the skin and from deep somatic tissues of the corresponding dermatomes, myotomes and sclerotomes. (3) The second-order neurons consist of excitatory and inhibitory interneurons (about 90 % of all dorsal horn neurons) and tract neurons activated monosynaptically in lamina I by visceral afferent neurons and di- or polysynaptically in deeper laminae. (4) The sensitization of viscero-somatic convergent neurons (central sensitization) is dependent on the sensitization of spinal visceral afferent neurons, local spinal excitatory and inhibitory interneurons and supraspinal endogenous control systems. The mechanisms of this central sensitization have been little explored. (5) Viscero-somatic tract neurons project through the contralateral ventrolateral tract and presumably other tracts to the lower and upper brain stem, the hypothalamus and via the thalamus to various cortical areas. (6) Visceral pain is presumably (together with other visceral sensations and nociceptive as well as non-nociceptive somatic body sensations) primarily represented in the posterior dorsal insular cortex (primary interoceptive cortex). This cortex receives in primates its spinal synaptic inputs mainly from lamina I tract neurons via the ventromedial posterior nucleus of the thalamus. (7) The transmission of activity from visceral afferents to second-order neurons in spinal cord is modulated in an excitatory and inhibitory way by endogenous anti- and pronociceptive control systems in the lower and upper brain stem. These control systems are under cortical control. (8) Visceral pain is referred to deep somatic tissues, to the skin and to other visceral organs. This referred pain consists of spontaneous pain and mechanical hyperalgesia. The mechanisms underlying referred pain and the accompanying tissue changes have been little explored.

Heart Rate Variability: New Perspectives on Physiological Mechanisms, Assessment of Self-regulatory Capacity, and Health risk

Heart rate variability, the change in the time intervals between adjacent heartbeats, is an emergent property of interdependent regulatory systems that operates on different time scales to adapt to environmental and psychological challenges. This article briefly reviews neural regulation of the heart and offers some new perspectives on mechanisms underlying the very low frequency rhythm of heart rate variability. Interpretation of heart rate variability rhythms in the context of health risk and physiological and psychological self-regulatory capacity assessment is discussed. The cardiovascular regulatory centers in the spinal cord and medulla integrate inputs from higher brain centers with afferent cardiovascular system inputs to adjust heart rate and blood pressure via sympathetic and parasympathetic efferent pathways. We also discuss the intrinsic cardiac nervous system and the heart-brain connection pathways, through which afferent information can influence activity in the subcortical, frontocortical, and motor cortex areas. In addition, the use of real-time HRV feedback to increase self-regulatory capacity is reviewed. We conclude that the heart's rhythms are characterized by both complexity and stability over longer time scales that reflect both physiological and psychological functional status of these internal self-regulatory systems.

Cardiac coherence, self-regulation, autonomic stability, and psychosocial well-being

The ability to alter one’s emotional responses is central to overall well-being and to effectively meeting the demands of life. One of the chief symptoms of events such as trauma, that overwhelm our capacities to successfully handle and adapt to them, is a shift in our internal baseline reference such that there ensues a repetitive activation of the traumatic event. This can result in high vigilance and over-sensitivity to environmental signals which are reflected in inappropriate emotional responses and autonomic nervous system dynamics. In this article we discuss the perspective that one’s ability to self-regulate the quality of feeling and emotion of one’s moment-to-moment experience is intimately tied to our physiology, and the reciprocal interactions among physiological, cognitive, and emotional systems. These interactions form the basis of information processing networks in which communication between systems occurs through the generation and transmission of rhythms and patterns of activity. Our discussion emphasizes the communication pathways between the heart and brain, as well as how these are related to cognitive and emotional function and self-regulatory capacity. We discuss the hypothesis that self-induced positive emotions increase the coherence in bodily processes, which is reflected in the pattern of the heart’s rhythm. This shift in the heart rhythm in turn plays an important role in facilitating higher cognitive functions, creating emotional stability and facilitating states of calm. Over time, this establishes a new inner-baseline reference, a type of implicit memory that organizes perception, feelings, and behavior. Without establishing a new baseline reference, people are at risk of getting “stuck” in familiar, yet unhealthy emotional and behavioral patterns and living their lives through the automatic filters of past familiar or traumatic experience.

Non-pharmacological Intervention for Chronic Pain in Veterans: A Pilot Study of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback

OBJECTIVE

Chronic pain is an emotionally and physically debilitating form of pain that activates the body's stress response and over time can result in lowered heart rate variability (HRV) power, which is associated with reduced resiliency and lower self-regulatory capacity. This pilot project was intended to determine the effectiveness of HRV coherence biofeedback (HRVCB) as a pain and stress management intervention for veterans with chronic pain and to estimate the effect sizes. It was hypothesized that HRVCB will increase parasympathetic activity resulting in higher HRV coherence measured as power and decrease self-reported pain symptoms in chronic pain patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Fourteen veterans receiving treatment for chronic pain were enrolled in the pre-post intervention study. They were randomly assigned, with 8 subjects enrolled in the treatment group and 6 in the control group. The treatment group received biofeedback intervention plus standard care, and the other group received standard care only. The treatment group received four HRVCB training sessions as the intervention.

MEASURES

Pre-post measurements of HRV amplitude, HRV power spectrum variables, cardiac coherence, and self-ratings of perceived pain, stress, negative emotions, and physical activity limitation were made for both treatment and control groups.

RESULTS

The mean pain severity for all subjects at baseline, using the self-scored Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), was 26.71 (SD=4.46; range=21-35) indicating a moderate to severe perceived pain level across the study subjects. There was no significant difference between the treatment and control groups at baseline on any of the measures. Post-HRVCB, the treatment group was significantly higher on coherence (P=.01) and lower (P=.02) on pain ratings than the control group. The treatment group showed marked and statistically significant (1-tailed) increases over the baseline in coherence ratio (191%, P=.04) and marked, significant (1-tailed) reduction in pain ratings (36%, P<.001), stress perception (16%, P=.02), negative emotions (49%, P<.001), and physical activity limitation (42%, P<.001). Significant between-group effects on all measures were found when pre-training values were used as covariates.

CONCLUSIONS

HRVCB intervention was effective in increasing HRV coherence measured as power in the upper range of the LF band and reduced perceived pain, stress, negative emotions, and physical activity limitation in veterans suffering from chronic pain. HRVCB shows promise as an effective non-pharmacological intervention to support standard treatments for chronic pain.

Tramadol and its enantiomers differentially suppress c-fos-like immunoreactivity in rat brain and spinal cord following acute noxious stimulus

Tramadol hydrochloride, (1RS,2RS)-2-[(dimethylamino)methyl]-1-(3-methoxyphenyl)-cyclohexanol hydrochloride, is an orally-active, centrally-acting analgesic with a putative dual mechanism of action, including an opioid and non-opioid component. The analgesic properties of tramadol and the possible co-existence of dual mechanisms has been postulated to be due to complementary and interactive pharmacologies of its enantiomers. We examined the ability of tramadol, its enantiomers, and morphine as reference to suppress c-fos-like immunoreactivity (c-fos-ir) in rat spinal cord and brain regions following a noxious stimulus (i.p. administration of 3.5% acetic acid). c-fos-ir was measured by immunocytochemistry and the stained cells in each region were counted 2 h after the acetic-acid injection (2:25 h after tramadol or morphine). Equi-analgesic doses of s.c. morphine (10 mg/kg) or tramadol (30 mg/kg) significantly suppressed c-fos-ir in all areas examined, except dorsal central gray of the spinal cord. The enantiomers of tramadol had distinctive patterns of suppression, neither one suppressed c-fos-ir in all of the regions, and hence neither one alone accounted for the suppression produced by the racemate. These findings support differential and complementary effects of tramadol enantiomers in sub-populations of spinal and supraspinal nociceptive neurons, consistent with the proposed antinociceptive interaction between the enantiomers.

Subdiaphragmatic vagal afferent innervation in activation of an opioidergic antinociceptive system in response to colorectal distension in rats

Abstract In a number of different experimental paradigms of somatic pain, there is evidence for a vagally mediated antinociceptive system. This pathway probably involves opioid mechanisms. However, whether this pathway is activated in visceral pain or if it involves subdiaphragmatic vagal afferents is unclear. The aim of the present study was to determine whether subdiaphragmatic vagal afferents mediate antinociception in response to a visceral stimulus and whether this involves an opioid pathway. Colorectal distension was performed in fasted, conscious male Sprague-Dawley rats using a balloon catheter connected to an electronic distension device. The number of abdominal contractions (visceromotor response) in response to a tonic colorectal distension (60 mmHg for 10 min) was recorded. Experiments were performed in sham or subdiaphragmatically vagotomized, perineural vehicle- or capsaicin-treated rats (to functionally denervate vagal afferents) before and after administration of naloxone (25 mg kg(-1) bodyweight intraperitoneally). Vagotomy, capsaicin and naloxone pretreatments all significantly enhanced the visceromotor response to colorectal distension. The effect of naloxone in capsaicin-treated rats did not appear to be additive. These results suggest that activation of subdiaphragmatic afferents, which can be blocked by capsaicin, may play a role in opioid-dependent antinociceptive pathways activated by a noxious visceral stimulus.

Integration of viscerosomatic sensory input at the spinal level

The major point of this chapter is that there is evidence to support the idea that cervical headache might not only result from injured somatic structures in the neck but also occur because of interactions with visceral organs. The complex arrangement of convergent inputs from somatic and visceral afferent fibers and of the propriospinal pathways in the upper cervical segments may create an environment to precipitate such headaches (Fig. 8). It is possible that the soreness experienced in the muscles innervating the neck may not be due to direct injury but may occur as muscle hyperalgesia that is often associated with visceral pain (Giamberardino, et al., 1993). Much more research is required to understand these complex interactions before patients who suffer pain of cervical headache can be treated satisfactorily.

The role of vagal visceral afferents in the control of nociception

We have shown that activity in subdiaphragmatic vagal afferents modulates mechanical hyperalgesic behavior in the rat. Subdiaphragmatic vagotomy decreases paw-withdrawal threshold to mechanical stimulation (baseline and after intradermal injection of bradykinin), thus enhancing mechanical hyperalgesic behavior. Most of this decrease is generated by an endocrine signal released by the adrenal medullae because denervation or removal of the adrenal medullae prevents or reverses these changes. This novel mechanism may imply that: (a) the brain is able to regulate sensitivity of nociceptors all over the body by a neuroendocrine mechanisms, (b) sensitivity of nociceptors can be influenced by changes in parts of the body which are remote from the location of the sensitized nociceptors and (c) circulating catecholamines can influence nociceptors in a way which is different from those reported so far (see Jänig and McLachlan, 1994; Jänig, 1996a; Jänig et al., 1996).

Visceral nociception

Visceral pain is of great concern to the medical community because it remains particularly resistant to current clinical treatments. A serendipitous and initially unexplainable clinical finding that a punctate midline dorsal column lesion is effective in eliminating visceral pain, however, has initiated a resurgence of interest in the study of the basic mechanisms of visceral nociception. Clinical and anatomic findings have determined that visceral pain either of thoracic or pelvic origin can be relieved by carefully placed lesions directed at the lateral edge or the medial edge of the gracile fasciculus, respectively. Studies are demonstrating that visceral pain is quite unique from cutaneous pain.

Ascending projections from the area around the spinal cord central canal: A Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin study in rats

A single small iontophoretic injection of Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin labels projections from the area surrounding the spinal cord central canal at midthoracic (T6-T9) or lumbosacral (L6-S1) segments of the spinal cord. The projections from the midthoracic or lumbosacral level of the medial spinal cord are found: 1) ascending ipsilaterally in the dorsal column near the dorsal intermediate septum or the midline of the gracile fasciculus, respectively; 2) terminating primarily in the dorsal, lateral rim of the gracile nucleus and the medial rim of the cuneate nucleus or the dorsomedial rim of the gracile nucleus, respectively; and 3) ascending bilaterally with slight contralateral predominance in the ventrolateral quadrant of the spinal cord and terminating in the ventral and medial medullary reticular formation. Other less dense projections are to the pons, midbrain, thalamus, hypothalamus, and other forebrain structures. Projections arising from the lumbosacral level are also found in Barrington's nucleus. The results of the present study support previous retrograde tract tracing and physiological studies from our group demonstrating that the neurons in the area adjacent to the central canal of the midthoracic or lumbosacral level of the spinal cord send long ascending projections to the dorsal column nucleus that are important in the transmission of second-order afferent information for visceral nociception. Thus, the axonal projections through both the dorsal and the ventrolateral white matter from the CC region terminate in many regions of the brain providing spinal input for sensory integration, autonomic regulation, motor and emotional responses, and limbic activation.

Cardiopulmonary sympathetic afferent input does not require dorsal column pathways to excite C1-C3 spinal cells in rats

Effects of electrically stimulating the left stellate ganglion to activate cardiopulmonary sympathetic afferent (CPSA) fibers were determined on C1-C3 dorsal horn neurons in anaesthetized rats. Fifty-two of 53 dorsal horn neurons affected by CPSA stimulation were excited and one neuron was inhibited. In 6 experiments, dorsal columns and ventrolateral funiculi were sequentially lesioned to determine neuronal pathways involved in CPSA activation of C1-C3 neurons. In 6 additional experiments, spinal transection at rostral C1 was used to determine the contribution of supraspinal relays. We concluded that CPSA input to C1-C3 segments travelled bilaterally in ventrolateral pathways, and that supraspinal relays were not required for CPSA excitation of C1-C3 neurons. These results suggest that neurons in C1-C3 segments might play an important role in processing visceral spinal afferent information.

Inhibition of bradykinin-induced plasma extravasation produced by noxious cutaneous and visceral stimuli and its modulation by vagal activity

Intrathecally applied nicotine reduces bradykinin-induced plasma extravasation (BK-induced PE) in the rat knee joint. This depression is mediated by the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and is enhanced by interruption of impulse traffic in afferents of the abdominal vagus nerve. Like intrathecal nicotine, electrical stimulation of unmyelinated cutaneous fibers also depresses BK-induced PE, which is also dependent on an intact HPA axis. In this study, we investigated whether the inhibitory effect of intrathecal nicotine can be mimicked by noxious stimulation of skin and of viscera. Furthermore we determined whether this depression is potentiated after subdiaphragmatic vagotomy. Stimulation of visceral afferents in the peritoneum, by intraperitoneal capsaicin injection, dose-dependently decreased BK-induced PE. The capsaicin dose-response function was shifted by 1.5-2 orders of magnitude to the left after vagotomy. Stimulation of visceral afferents in the urinary bladder by capsaicin also dose-dependently reduced BK-induced PE, which similarly was potentiated after vagotomy. Transcutaneous stimulation of unmyelinated nociceptive afferents from the plantar skin of the paw depressed BK-induced PE. This depression had a threshold of approximately 0.25 Hz and was maximal at a stimulation frequency of approximately 1 Hz. After subdiaphragmatic vagotomy, the stimulus response function shifted to the left and the inhibition was significantly larger than in control, in the range of 0.125-1 Hz stimulation. These results show that noxious stimulation of skin and viscera depressed BK-induced PE and that such depression was potentiated after subdiaphragmatic vagotomy in a manner similar to that of intrathecally applied nicotine. Based on these observations, we hypothesize that intrathecal nicotine depresses BK-induced PE by exciting spinal nociceptive neurons or the central projections of nociceptive primary afferent neurons.

Neurobiology of visceral afferent neurons: neuroanatomy, functions, organ regulations and sensations

Visceral organs are innervated by vagal and spinal visceral afferent neurons which serve as interface between visceral domain and brain. They have multiple functions, one of which is the encoding of mechanical and chemical events and the relay of these messages to the CNS. Vagal afferent neurons project viscerotopically to the nucleus of the solitary tract in the medulla oblongata. Spinal visceral afferent neurons project segmentally to the laminae I and V and deeper of the spinal dorsal horn. Visceral pain and discomfort are associated with spinal visceral afferents. Functionally there exist general classes of visceral afferents, the compositions of which are distributed according to the type and function of visceral organ: low-threshold mechanosensitive afferents responding to distension and contraction and other stimuli; specific chemosensitive afferents (probably only vagal); and high-threshold mechanosensitive afferents. Normally mechano-insensitive spinal visceral afferents which are chemosensitive may be recruited in pathophysiological conditions. Visceral events which lead to the generation of distinct organ regulations, reflexes and sensations may be encoded by functionally specific sets of afferents or by the intensity-coding in afferents or by both. Pain elicited from some visceral organs may not be associated with the activation of specific sets of 'visceral nociceptors' but with the intensity of discharge in spinal visceral afferents.