Operational characteristics of the 5-HT1-like receptors mediating external carotid vasoconstriction in vagosympathectomized dogs. Close resemblance to the 5-HT1D receptor subtype

A link between gastrointestinal disorders and migraine: Insights into the gut-brain connection

Background

Migraine is a complex, multifaceted, and disabling headache disease that is often complicated by gastrointestinal (GI) conditions, such as gastroparesis, functional dyspepsia, and cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS). Functional dyspepsia and CVS are part of a spectrum of disorders newly classified as disorders of gut–brain interaction (DGBI). Gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia are both associated with delayed gastric emptying, while nausea and vomiting are prominent in CVS, which are also symptoms that commonly occur with migraine attacks. Furthermore, these gastric disorders are comorbidities frequently reported by patients with migraine. While very few studies assessing GI disorders in patients with migraine have been performed, they do demonstrate a physiological link between these conditions.

Objective

To summarize the available studies supporting a link between GI comorbidities and migraine, including historical and current scientific evidence, as well as provide evidence that symptoms of GI disorders are also observed outside of migraine attacks during the interictal period. Additionally, the importance of route of administration and formulation of migraine therapies for patients with GI symptoms will be discussed.

Methods

A literature search of PubMed for articles relating to the relationship between the gut and the brain with no restriction on the publication year was performed. Studies providing scientific support for associations of gastroparesis, functional dyspepsia, and CVS with migraine and the impact these associations may have on migraine treatment were the primary focus. This is a narrative review of identified studies.

Results

Although the association between migraine and GI disorders has received very little attention in the literature, the existing evidence suggests that they may share a common etiology. In particular, the relationship between migraine, gastric motility, and vomiting has important clinical implications in the treatment of migraine, as delayed gastric emptying and vomiting may affect oral dosing compliance, and thus, the absorption and efficacy of oral migraine treatments.

Conclusions

There is evidence of a link between migraine and GI comorbidities, including those under the DGBI classification. Many patients do not find adequate relief with oral migraine therapies, which further necessitates increased recognition of GI disorders in patients with migraine by the headache community.

Activation of 5-hydroxytryptamine1B/1D/1F receptors as a mechanism of action of antimigraine drugs

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of the triptans (5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1B/1D receptor agonists) was a great improvement in the acute treatment of migraine. However, shortcomings of the triptans have prompted research on novel serotonergic targets for the treatment of migraine.

AREAS COVERED

In this review the different types of antimigraine drugs acting at 5-HT receptors, their discovery and development are discussed. The first specific antimigraine drugs were the ergot alkaloids, consisting of ergotamine, dihydroergotamine and methysergide, which are agonists at 5-HT receptors, but can also bind α-adrenoceptors and dopamine receptors. In the 1990s, the triptans became available on the market. They are 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, showing fewer side effects due to their receptor specificity. In the last years, compounds that bind specifically to 5-HT1D, 5-HT1F and 5-HT7 receptors have been explored for their antimigraine potential. Furthermore, the serotonergic system seems to act in tight connection with the glutamatergic as well as the CGRP-ergic systems, which may open novel therapeutic avenues.

EXPERT OPINION

Although the triptans are very effective in treating migraine attacks, their shortcomings have stimulated the search for novel drugs. Currently, the focus is on 5-HT1F receptor agonists, which seem devoid of vascular side effects. Moreover, novel compounds that affect multiple transmitter and/or neuropeptide systems that are involved in migraine could be of therapeutic relevance.

The relevance of preclinical research models for the development of antimigraine drugs: focus on 5-HT(1B/1D) and CGRP receptors

Migraine is a complex neurovascular syndrome, causing a unilateral pulsating headache with accompanying symptoms. The past four decades have contributed immensely to our present understanding of migraine pathophysiology and have led to the introduction of specific antimigraine therapies, much to the relief of migraineurs. Pathophysiological factors culminating into migraine headaches have not yet been completely deciphered and, thus, pose an additional challenge for preclinical research in the absence of any direct experimental marker. Migraine provocation experiments in humans use a head-score to evaluate migraine, as articulated by the volunteer, which cannot be applied to laboratory animals. Therefore, basic research focuses on different symptoms and putative mechanisms, one at a time or in combination, to validate the hypotheses. Studies in several species, utilizing different preclinical approaches, have significantly contributed to the two antimigraine principles in therapeutics, namely: 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonists (known as triptans) and CGRP receptor antagonists (known as gepants). This review will analyze the preclinical experimental models currently known for the development of these therapeutic principles, which are mainly based on the vascular and/or neurogenic theories of migraine pathogenesis. These include models based on the involvement of cranial vasodilatation and/or the trigeminovascular system in migraine. Clearly, the preclinical strategies should involve both approaches, while incorporating the newer ideas/techniques in order to get better insights into migraine pathophysiology.

Cardiovascular responses produced by 5-hydroxytriptamine:a pharmacological update on the receptors/mechanisms involved and therapeutic implications

The complexity of cardiovascular responses produced by 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin), including bradycardia or tachycardia, hypotension or hypertension, and vasodilatation or vasoconstriction, has been explained by the capability of this monoamine to interact with different receptors in the central nervous system (CNS), on the autonomic ganglia and postganglionic nerve endings, on vascular smooth muscle and endothelium, and on the cardiac tissue. Depending, among other factors, on the species, the vascular bed under study, and the experimental conditions, these responses are mainly mediated by 5-HT(1), 5-HT(2), 5-HT(3), 5-HT(4), 5-ht(5A/5B), and 5-HT(7) receptors as well as by a tyramine-like action or unidentified mechanisms. It is noteworthy that 5-HT(6) receptors do not seem to be involved in the cardiovascular responses to 5-HT. Regarding heart rate, intravenous (i.v.) administration of 5-HT usually lowers this variable by eliciting a von Bezold-Jarisch-like reflex via 5-HT(3) receptors located on sensory vagal nerve endings in the heart. Other bradycardic mechanisms include cardiac sympatho-inhibition by prejunctional 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors and, in the case of the rat, an additional 5-ht(5A/5B) receptor component. Moreover, i.v. 5-HT can increase heart rate in different species (after vagotomy) by a variety of mechanisms/receptors including activation of: (1) myocardial 5-HT(2A) (rat), 5-HT(3) (dog), 5-HT(4) (pig, human), and 5-HT(7) (cat) receptors; (2) adrenomedullary 5-HT(2) (dog) and prejunctional sympatho-excitatory 5-HT(3) (rabbit) receptors associated with a release of catecholamines; (3) a tyramine-like action mechanism (guinea pig); and (4) unidentified mechanisms (certain lamellibranch and gastropod species). Furthermore, central administration of 5-HT can cause, in general, bradycardia and/or tachycardia mediated by activation of, respectively, 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(2) receptors. On the other hand, the blood pressure response to i.v. administration of 5-HT is usually triphasic and consists of an initial short-lasting vasodepressor response due to a reflex bradycardia (mediated by 5-HT(3) receptors located on vagal afferents, via the von Bezold-Jarisch-like reflex), a middle vasopressor phase, and a late, longer-lasting, vasodepressor response. The vasopressor response is a consequence of vasoconstriction mainly mediated by 5-HT(2A) receptors; however, vasoconstriction in the canine saphenous vein and external carotid bed as well as in the porcine cephalic arteries and arteriovenous anastomoses is due to activation of 5-HT(1B) receptors. The late vasodepressor response may involve three different mechanisms: (1) direct vasorelaxation by activation of 5-HT(7) receptors located on vascular smooth muscle; (2) inhibition of the vasopressor sympathetic outflow by sympatho-inhibitory 5-HT(1A/1B/1D) receptors; and (3) release of endothelium-derived relaxing factor (nitric oxide) by 5-HT(2B) and/or 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors. Furthermore, central administration of 5-HT can cause both hypotension (mainly mediated by 5-HT(1A) receptors) and hypertension (mainly mediated by 5-HT(2) receptors). The increasing availability of new compounds with high affinity and selectivity for the different 5-HT receptor subtypes makes it possible to develop drugs with potential therapeutic usefulness in the treatment of some cardiovascular illnesses including hypertension, migraine, some peripheral vascular diseases, and heart failure.

Experimental migraine models and their relevance in migraine therapy

Although the understanding of migraine pathophysiology is incomplete, it is now well accepted that this neurovascular syndrome is mainly due to a cranial vasodilation with activation of the trigeminal system. Several experimental migraine models, based on vascular and neuronal involvement, have been developed. Obviously, the migraine models do not entail all facets of this clinically heterogeneous disorder, but their contribution at several levels (molecular, in vitro, in vivo) has been crucial in the development of novel antimigraine drugs and in the understanding of migraine pathophysiology. One important vascular in vivo model, based on an assumption that migraine headache involves cranial vasodilation, determines porcine arteriovenous anastomotic blood flow. Other models utilize electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion/nerve to study neurogenic dural inflammation, while the superior sagittal sinus stimulation model takes into account the transmission of trigeminal nociceptive input in the brainstem. More recently, the introduction of integrated models, namely electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion or systemic administration of capsaicin, allows studying the activation of the trigeminal system and its effect on the cranial vasculature. Studies using in vitro models have contributed enormously during the preclinical stage to characterizing the receptors in cranial blood vessels and to studying the effects of several putative antimigraine agents. The aforementioned migraine models have advantages as well as some limitations. The present review is devoted to discussing various migraine models and their relevance to antimigraine therapy.

Clonidine inhibits the canine external carotid vasodilatation to capsaicin by α2A/2C-adrenoceptors

Migraine is a disorder associated with increased plasma concentrations of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). CGRP, a neuropeptide released from activated trigeminal sensory nerves, dilates cranial blood vessels and transmits vascular nociception. Moreover, several antimigraine drugs inhibit the dural neurogenic vasodilatation to trigeminal stimulation. Hence, this study investigated in anaesthetized dogs the effects of the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, clonidine, on the external carotid vasodilator responses to capsaicin, alpha-CGRP and acetylcholine. 1-min intracarotid infusions of capsaicin (10, 18, 30 and 56 microg/min), alpha-CGRP (0.1, 0.3, 1 and 3 microg/min) and acetylcholine (0.01, 0.03, 0.1 and 0.3 microg/min) produced dose-dependent increases in external carotid conductance without affecting blood pressure or heart rate. Interestingly, the carotid vasodilator responses to capsaicin, but not those to alpha-CGRP or acetylcholine, were partially inhibited after clonidine (total dose: 24.4 microg/kg, i.v.); in contrast, equivalent volumes of saline did not affect the responses to capsaicin, alpha-CGRP or acetylcholine. The inhibitory responses to clonidine were antagonized by i.v. administration of the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor antagonists rauwolscine (alpha(2A/2B/2C); 300 microg/kg), BRL44408 (alpha(2A); 1000 microg/kg) or MK912 (alpha(2C); 100 and 300 microg/kg), but not by imiloxan (alpha(2B); 1000 microg/kg). These results suggest that clonidine inhibits the external carotid vasodilator responses to capsaicin by peripheral trigeminovascular and/or central mechanisms; this inhibitory response to clonidine seems to be predominantly mediated by alpha(2A)-adrenoceptors and, to a much lesser extent, by alpha(2C)-adrenoceptors.

Potential vascular α1-adrenoceptor blocking properties of an array of 5-HT receptor ligands in the rat

This study set out to analyse the potential ability of some 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor ligands widely used in cardiovascular experimental models to interact with vascular alpha1-adrenoceptors in the pithed rat. These ligands included: methiothepin, methysergide and metergoline (5-HT(1)/5-HT2); WAY-100635, buspirone, ipsapirone and 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) (5-HT(1A)); GR127935 (5-HT(1B/1D)); ketanserin, ritanserin, spiperone and pizotifen (5-HT2); granisetron and metoclopramide (5-HT3); tropisetron (5-HT3/5-HT4); ergotamine (5-HT(1B/1D), 5-ht(5A/5B)); clozapine (5-HT6/5-HT7); as well as LY215840 and mesulergine (5-HT2/5-HT7). For this purpose, the increases in diastolic blood pressure produced by the selective alpha1-adrenoceptor agonist, phenylephrine, were analysed before and after the above antagonists or saline. The adrenoceptor antagonist properties of prazosin (alpha1) and yohimbine (alpha2) were also analysed for comparison. Thus, the phenylephrine-induced vasopressor responses were dose-dependently antagonised with the following apparent rank order of potency by: prazosin > or = methiothepin > ketanserin > clozapine > or = lisuride >> buspirone; this potency correlates with the affinity of these compounds for alpha1-adrenoceptor binding sites. In contrast, the other compounds were either devoid of any blocking effect on--or even potentiated (i.e. lisuride, methysergide, 8-OH-DPAT, granisetron and GR127935)--the responses to phenylephrine. These results show that methiothepin, ketanserin, clozapine, lisuride and buspirone can block alpha1-adrenoceptors in the rat systemic vasculature.

Pharmacological profile of the 5-HT-induced inhibition of cardioaccelerator sympathetic outflow in pithed rats: correlation with 5-HT1 and putative 5-ht5A/5B receptors

Continuous infusions of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) inhibit the tachycardiac responses to preganglionic (C7-T1) sympathetic stimulation in pithed rats pretreated with desipramine. The present study identified the pharmacological profile of this inhibitory action of 5-HT. The inhibition induced by intravenous (i.v.) continuous infusions of 5-HT (5.6 microg x kg-1x min-1) on sympathetically induced tachycardiac responses remained unaltered after i.v. treatment with saline or the antagonists GR 127935 (5-HT1B/1D), the combination of WAY 100635 (5-HT1A) plus GR 127935, ritanserin (5-HT2), tropisetron (5-HT3/4), LY215840 (5-HT7) or a cocktail of antagonists/inhibitors consisting of yohimbine (alpha2), prazosin (alpha1), ritanserin, GR 127935, WAY 100635 and indomethacin (cyclooxygenase), but was abolished by methiothepin (5-HT1/2/6/7 and recombinant 5-ht5A/5B). These drugs, used in doses high enough to block their respective receptors/mechanisms, did not modify the sympathetically induced tachycardiac responses per se. I.v. continuous infusions of the agonists 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT; 5-HT1/7 and recombinant 5-ht5A/5B), CP 93129 (r5-HT1B), sumatriptan (5-HT1B/1D), PNU-142633 (5-HT1D) and ergotamine (5-HT1B/1D and recombinant 5-ht5A/5B) mimicked the above sympatho-inhibition to 5-HT. In contrast, the agonists indorenate (5-HT1A) and LY344864 (5-ht1F) were inactive. Interestingly, 5-CT-induced cardiac sympatho-inhibition was abolished by methiothepin, the cocktail of antagonists/inhibitors, GR 127935 or the combination of SB224289 (5-HT1B) plus BRL15572 (5-HT1D), but remained unchanged when SB224289 or BRL15572 were given separately. Therefore, 5-HT-induced cardiac sympatho-inhibition, being unrelated to 5-HT2, 5-HT3, 5-HT4, 5-ht6, 5-HT7 receptors, alpha1/2-adrenoceptor or prostaglandin synthesis, seems to be primarily mediated by (i). 5-HT1 (probably 5-HT1B/1D) receptors and (ii). a novel mechanism antagonized by methiothepin that, most likely, involves putative 5-ht5A/5B receptors.

A61603-induced vasoconstriction in porcine carotid vasculature: involvement of a non-adrenergic mechanism

It has recently been shown that the pharmacological profile of alpha(1)-adrenoceptors mediating constriction of porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses resembles that of alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-adrenoceptor subtypes. In an attempt to verify the involvement of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors, we used the potent alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor agonist N-[5-(4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazol-2yl)-2-hydroxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-naphthalen-1-yl]methane sulphonamide (A61603) and found that intracarotid (i.c.) administration of A61603 (0.3-10 microg kg(-1)) dose-dependently decreased porcine carotid blood flow and vascular conductance. This decrease was exclusively due to a constriction of carotid arteriovenous anastomoses; the capillary blood flow and conductance remained unchanged. Surprisingly, the responses to A61603 were little modified by prior i.v. treatment with 5-methylurapidil (1000 microg kg(-1)), prazosin (100 microg kg(-1)) or a combination of prazosin and rauwolscine (100 and 300 microg kg(-1), respectively). The 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist N-[4-methoxy-3-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl) phenyl]-2'-methyl-4'(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazol-3-yl)[1,1,-biphenyl]-4-carboxamide hydrochloride monohydrate (GR127935; 500 microg kg(-1)) and ketanserin (500 microg kg(-1)) also failed to modify carotid vascular responses to A61603, but, interestingly, methiothepin (3000 microg kg(-1)) proved to be an effective antagonist. Taken together, the present results show that A61603 is a relatively poor agonist at the alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor in anaesthetised pigs and that the carotid vasoconstriction produced by A61603 is mediated by a novel non-adrenergic mechanism.

Evidence for 5-HT(1B/1D) and 5-HT(2A) receptors mediating constriction of the canine internal carotid circulation

The present study has investigated the preliminary pharmacological profile of the receptors mediating vasoconstriction to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in the internal carotid bed of vagosympathectomised dogs. One minute intracarotid infusions of the agonists 5-HT (0.1 - 10 microg min(-1)), sumatriptan (0.3 - 10 microg min(-1); 5-HT(1B/1D)), 5-methoxytryptamine (1 - 100 microg min(-1); 5-HT(1), 5-HT(2), 5-HT(4), 5-ht(6) and 5-HT(7)) or DOI (0.31 - 10 microg min(-1); 5-HT(2)), but not 5-carboxamidotryptamine (0.01 - 0.3 microg min(-1); 5-HT(1), 5-ht(5A) and 5-HT(7)), 1-(m-chlorophenyl)-biguanide (mCPBG; 1 - 1000 microg min(-1); 5-HT(3)) or cisapride (1 - 1000 microg min(-1); 5-HT(4)), resulted in dose-dependent decreases in internal carotid blood flow, without changing blood pressure or heart rate. The vasoconstrictor responses to 5-HT, which remained unaffected after saline, were resistant to blockade by i.v. administration of the antagonists ritanserin (100 microg kg(-1); 5-HT(2A/2B/2C)) in combination with tropisetron (3000 microg kg(-1); 5-HT(3/4)) or the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor, indomethacin (5000 microg kg(-1)), but were abolished by the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist, GR127935 (30 microg kg(-1)). Interestingly, after administration of GR127935, the subsequent administration of ritanserin unmasked a dose-dependent vasodilator component. GR127935 or saline did not practically modify the vasoconstrictor effects of 5-MeO-T. In animals receiving GR127935, the subsequent administration of ritanserin abolished the vasoconstrictor responses to 5-MeO-T unmasking a dose-dependent vasodilator component. The vasoconstriction induced by sumatriptan was antagonized by GR127935, but not by ritanserin. Furthermore, ritanserin (100 microg kg(-1)) or ketanserin (100 microg kg(-1); 5-HT(2A)), but not GR127935, abolished DOI-induced vasoconstrictor responses. The above results suggest that 5-HT-induced internal carotid vasoconstriction is predominantly mediated by 5-HT(1B/1D) and 5-HT(2A) receptors.

The GR127935-sensitive 5-HT(1) receptors mediating canine internal carotid vasoconstriction: resemblance to the 5-HT(1B), but not to the 5-HT(1D) or 5-ht(1F), receptor subtype

This study has further investigated the pharmacological profile of the GR127935-sensitive 5-HT(1) receptors mediating vasoconstriction in the internal carotid bed of anaesthetized vagosympathectomized dogs. One-minute intracarotid infusions of the agonists 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; 0.1 - 10 microg min(-1); endogenous ligand) and sumatriptan (0.3 - 10 microg min(-1); 5-HT(1B/1D)), but not PNU-142633 (1 - 1000 microg min(-1); 5-HT(1D)) or LY344864 (1 - 1000 microg min(-1); 5-ht(1F)), produced dose-dependent decreases in internal carotid blood flow without changing blood pressure or heart rate. The responses to 5-HT were apparently resistant to blockade by i.v. administration of the antagonists SB224289 (300 microg kg(-1); 5-HT(1B)), BRL15572 (300 microg kg(-1); 5-HT(1D)) or ritanserin (100 microg kg(-1); 5-HT(2)). In contrast, the responses to sumatriptan were antagonized by SB224289, but not by BRL15572. In the animals receiving SB224289, but not those receiving BRL15572, the subsequent administration of ritanserin abolished the 5-HT-induced vasoconstriction and unmasked a vasodilator component. Similarly, in ritanserin-treated animals, the subsequent administration of SB224289, but not BRL15572, completely blocked the 5-HT-induced vasoconstriction, revealing vasodilatation. In animals receiving initially BRL15572, the subsequent administration of SB224289 did not affect (except at 10 microg min(-1)) the vasoconstrictor responses to 5-HT. Notably, in animals pretreated with 1000 microg kg(-1) of mesulergine, a 5-HT(2/7) receptor antagonist, 5-HT produced a dose-dependent vasoconstriction, which was practically abolished by SB224289. After BRL15572, no further blockade was produced and the subsequent administration of ritanserin was similarly inactive. These results suggest that the GR127935-sensitive 5-HT(1) receptors mediating canine internal carotid vasoconstriction resemble the 5-HT(1B) but not the 5-HT(1D) or 5-ht(1F), receptor subtype.

Investigation of the role of 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors in the sumatriptan-induced constriction of porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses

1. It has previously been shown that the antimigraine drug sumatriptan constricts porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses via 5-HT1-like receptors, identical to 5-H1B/1D receptors. The recent availability of silent antagonists selective for the 5-HT1B (SB224289) and 5-HT1D (BRL15572) receptor led us to further analyse the nature of receptors involved. 2. In pentobarbitone-anaesthetized, bilaterally vagosympathectomized pigs, sumatriptan (30, 100 and 300 microg kg(-1), i.v.) dose-dependently decreased carotid arteriovenous anastomotic conductance by up to 70+/-5%. 3. The dose-related decreases in carotid arteriovenous anastomotic conductance by sumatriptan (30, 100 and 300 microg kg(-1), i.v.) remained unchanged in animals treated (i.v.) with 1 mg kg(-1) of BRL15572 (maximum decrease: 72+/-3%), but were significantly attenuated by 1 mg kg(-1) (maximum decrease: 30+/-11%) and abolished by 3 mg kg(-1) (maximum decrease: 3+/-7%) of SB224289. The highest dose of SB224289 did not attenuate the hypertension, tachycardia or increases in carotid blood flow induced by bolus injections of noradrenaline (0.1-3 microg kg(-1), i.v.). 4. The results indicate that sumatriptan constricts porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses primarily via 5-HT1B, but not via 5-HT1D receptors.

Canine external carotid vasoconstriction to methysergide, ergotamine and dihydroergotamine: role of 5-HT1B/1D receptors and alpha2-adrenoceptors

The antimigraine drugs methysergide, ergotamine and dihydroergotamine (DHE) produce selective vasoconstriction in the external carotid bed of vagosympathectomized dogs anaesthetized with pentobarbital and artificially respired, but the receptors involved have not yet been completely characterized. Since the above drugs display affinity for several binding sites, including alpha-adrenoceptors and several 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 receptor subtypes, this study has analysed the mechanisms involved in the above responses. Intracarotid (i.c.) infusions during 1 min of methysergide (31-310 microg min(-1)), ergotamine (0.56-5.6 microg min(-1)) or DHE (5.6-31 microg min(-1)) dose-dependently reduced external carotid blood flow (ECBF) by up to 46+/-4, 37+/-4 and 49+/-5%, respectively. Blood pressure and heart rate remained unchanged. The reductions in ECBF by methysergide were abolished and even reversed to increases in animals pre-treated with GR127935 (10 microg kg(-1), i.v.). The reductions in ECBF by ergotamine and DHE remained unchanged in animals pre-treated (i.v.) with prazosin (300 microg kg(-1)), but were partly antagonized in animals pre-treated with either GR127935 (10 or 30 microg kg(-1)) or yohimbine (1000 microg kg(-1)). Pre-treatment with a combination of GR127935 (30 microg kg(-1)) and yohimbine (1000 microg kg(-1)) abolished the responses to both ergotamine and DHE. The above doses of antagonists were shown to produce selective antagonism at their respective receptors. These results suggest that the external carotid vasoconstrictor responses to methysergide primarily involve 5-HT1B/1D receptors, whereas those to ergotamine and DHE are mediated by 5-HT1B/1D receptors as well as alpha2-adrenoceptors.

The canine external carotid vasoconstrictor 5-HT1 receptor: blockade by 5-HT1B (SB224289), but not by 5-HT1D (BRL15572) receptor antagonists

In vagosympathectomised dogs pre-treated intravenously (i.v.) with mesulergine (300 microg/kg), 1-min intracarotid (i.c.) infusions of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; 0.3-30 microg/min) and sumatriptan (1-30 microg/min) dose-dependently decreased external carotid blood flow, without affecting mean blood pressure or heart rate. Treatment with the selective 5-HT1B receptor antagonist SB224289 (2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-1'-methyl-5-[2'-methyl-4'(5-methyl-1,2,4-oxadiazo l-3-yl) biphenyl-4-carbonyl]furo[2,3f]indole-3-spiro-4'-piperidine hydrochloride; 30-300 microg/kg, i.v.) produced a potent, specific and dose-dependent blockade of this response, whereas the selective 5-HT1D receptor antagonist BRL15572 (1-(3-chlorophenyl)-4-[3,3-diphenyl(2-(S,R) hydroxypropanyl)piperazine]hydrochloride; 30-300 microg/kg, i.v.) was ineffective. It is concluded that mainly 5-HT1B, but not 5-HT1D receptors mediate the canine external carotid vasoconstriction by 5-HT and sumatriptan.

External carotid effects of 2-(2-aminoethyl)-quinoline (D-1997) in vagosympathectomized dogs

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) elicits external carotid vasoconstriction in vagosympathectomized dogs via 5-HT1B/1D receptors and a mechanism unrelated to the 5-HT1, 5-HT2, 5-HT3 and 5-HT4 types. In order to further explore the nature of this novel mechanism, the canine external carotid effects of 2-(2-aminoethyl)-quinoline (D-1997), a novel 5-HT1 receptor agonist, were analyzed and compared with those of 5-HT and sumatriptan. Intracarotid (i.c.) infusions of 5-HT, D-1997 and sumatriptan to vagosympathectomized dogs dose-dependently decreased external carotid conductance, the rank order of agonist potency being 5-HT > sumatriptan > D-1997. The effects to D-1997 were resistant to intravenous (i.v.) pretreatment with 5-HT2 and 5-HT3/5-HT4 receptor antagonists. Remarkably, the effects induced by lower (10-100 microg/min), but not higher (300-1000 microg/min), doses of D-1997 were blocked by high doses of methiothepin (1 and 3 mg/kg, i.v.), as previously shown with 5-HT. In addition, GR-127935 (1-10 microg/kg, i.v.), partially and dose-dependently antagonized D-1997-induced responses. However, the effects of D-1997 remained unaltered after blockade of alpha- and beta-adrenoceptors, muscarinic, nicotinic, histamine and dopamine receptors, or inhibition of 5-HT-uptake or cyclo-oxygenase, depletion of biogenic amines or blockade of Ca2+ channels. These results may support our previous contention that lower doses of 5-HT elicit external carotid vasoconstriction in vagosympathectomized dogs by activation of 5-HT1B/1D receptors, whilst higher doses of 5-HT stimulate a novel vasoconstrictor mechanism.

5-HT1-like receptors: a time to bid goodbye

It is exactly half a century ago that 5-hydroxytryptamine was discovered and over four decades ago two types of 5-HT receptors were described. In this article, Pramod Saxena, Peter De Vries and Carlos Villalón trace the development of the modern classification and nomenclature of 5-HT receptors, which now include more than a dozen subtypes. In doing so, they advocate that the so-called '5-HT1-like' receptors, having been shown to be a heterogeneous population of 5-HT1B, 5-HT1D and 5-HT7 receptors, are now redundant.

The 5-HT1-like receptors mediating inhibition of sympathetic vasopressor outflow in the pithed rat: operational correlation with the 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D subtypes

1. It has been suggested that the inhibition of sympathetically-induced vasopressor responses produced by 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in pithed rats is mediated by 5-HT1-like receptors. The present study has re-analysed this suggestion with regard to the classification schemes recently proposed by the NC-IUPHAR subcommittee on 5-HT receptors. 2. Intravenous (i.v.) continuous infusions of 5-HT and the 5-HT1 receptor agonists, 8-OH-DPAT (5-HT1A), indorenate (5-HT1A), CP 93,129 (5-HT1B) and sumatriptan (5-HT(1B/1D)), resulted in a dose-dependent inhibition of sympathetically-induced vasopressor responses. 3. The sympatho-inhibitory responses induced by 5-HT, 8-OH-DPAT, indorenate, CP 93,129 or sumatriptan were analysed before and after i.v. treatment with blocking doses of the putative 5-HT receptor antagonists, WAY 100635 (5-HT1A), cyanopindolol (5-HT(1A/1B)) or GR 127935 (5-HT(1B/1D)). Thus, after WAY 100635, the responses to 5-HT and indorenate, but not to 8-OH-DPAT, CP 93,129 and sumatriptan, were blocked. After cyanopindolol, the responses to 5-HT, indorenate and CP 93,129 were abolished, whilst those to 8-OH-DPAT and sumatriptan (except at the lowest frequency of stimulation) remained unaltered. In contrast, after GR 127935, the responses to 5-HT, CP 93,129 and sumatriptan, but not to 8-OH-DPAT and indorenate, were abolished. 4. In additional experiments, the inhibition induced by 5-HT was not modified after 5-HT7 receptor blocking doses of mesulergine. 5. The above results suggest that the 5-HT1-like receptors, which inhibit the sympathetic vasopressor outflow in pithed rats, display the pharmacological profile of the 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D, but not that of 5-HT7, receptors.

The antimigraine agent alniditan selectively constricts porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses via 5-HT1B/1D receptors

In previous studies, we have shown that several 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonists, including sumatriptan, potently constrict porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses. This effect seems to be of high predictive value for antimigraine activity. In the present experiments, we studied the effects of a new non-indole 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist, alniditan, on systemic and carotid haemodynamics in anaesthetised pigs. In control animals, no significant changes in either systemic or carotid haemodynamics were observed after four consecutive i.v. injections of physiological saline (0.5 ml each, every 20 min; n = 4). On the other hand, i.v. doses of alniditan (3, 10, 30 and 100 microg kg(-1) in 0.5 ml saline, every 20 min; n = 6) dose-dependently decreased total carotid conductance (maximum change: -31 +/- 6%) by a selective vasoconstrictor action on arteriovenous anastomoses (maximum change: -72 +/- 5%); the nutrient vascular bed dilated in response to alniditan (maximum change: +103 +/- 39%). The dose of alniditan that decreased arteriovenous anastomotic conductance by 50% was 24 +/- 8 microg kg(-1) (64 +/- 20 nmol kg(-1)). Alniditan produced a slight bradycardia (maximum change: -4 +/- 1%) and a more pronounced hypotensive effect (maximum change: -23 +/- 5%). In six animals pre-treated with the potent and selective 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist, GR127935, the alniditan-induced changes in carotid haemodynamics were clearly antagonised, whereas the bradycardia and hypotension remained unaffected. These results suggest that alniditan selectively constricts porcine carotid arteriovenous anastomoses mainly via 5-HT1B/1D receptors and should be able to abort migraine headaches. The latter has indeed been confirmed in initial clinical studies in man.

Pharmacological analysis of the haemodynamic effects of 5-HT1B/D receptor agonists in the normotensive rat

1 The receptors involved in mediating the haemodynamic effects of three 5-HT1B/D receptor agonists were investigated in pentobarbitone anaesthetized rats (n = 6-17 per group). 2 Cumulative intravenous (i.v.) infusions of rizatriptan and sumatriptan (from 0.63 to 2500 microg kg(-1); each dose over 5 min) induced dose-dependent and marked hypotension (-42+/-6 and -34+/-4 mmHg at the highest dose, respectively; both P<0.05 vs vehicle: +5+/-3 mmHg) and bradycardia (-85+/-16 and -44+/-12 beats min(-1) at the highest dose, respectively; both P<0.05 vs vehicle: +16+/-6 beats min(-1)). Zolmitriptan evoked only moderate hypotension at the highest dose (-19+/-9 mmHg; P<0.05 vs vehicle). 3 A high dose of the 5-HT1B/D receptor antagonist, GR 127935 (0.63 mg kg(-1), i.v.), failed to antagonize the hypotension and bradycardia evoked by sumatriptan (-35+/-6 mmHg and -52+/-19 beats min(-1), respectively; both not significant vs sumatriptan in untreated rats), but moderately reduced the hypotension and bradycardia evoked by rizatriptan (-20+/-5 mmHg and -30+/-17 beats min(-1), respectively; both P<0.05 vs vehicle and vs rizatriptan in untreated rats). 4 The selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635 (0.16 and 0.63 mg kg(-1), i.v.), dose-dependently attenuated the haemodynamic responses evoked by rizatriptan and sumatriptan, which were almost abolished by the higher dose of WAY 100635 (-4+/-3 mmHg and -15+/-8 beats min(-1); both not significant vs vehicle and P<0.05 vs rizatriptan in untreated rats). A slight but statistically significant reduction in mean arterial pressure (MAP) persisted at the highest dose of sumatriptan (-13+/-4 mmHg following the higher dose of WAY 100635; P<0.05 vs vehicle). 5 In pithed rats with MAP normalized by angiotensin II, rizatriptan failed to induce hypotension or bradycardia (+5+/-4 mmHg and -6+/-16 beats min(-1), respectively; both NS vs vehicle and P<0.05 vs rizatriptan in untreated rats). Similarly, sumatriptan failed to induce bradycardia in pithed rats (+5+/-6 beats min(-1); not significant vs vehicle and P<0.05 vs sumatriptan in untreated rats), whereas a slight but statistically significant reduction in MAP, compared to controls, occurred at the highest dose (-9+/-9 mmHg; P<0.05 vs both vehicle and sumatriptan in untreated rats). 6 In bilaterally vagotomized and atropine-treated (1 mg kg(-1), i.v.) rats, the reductions in MAP and heart rate evoked by rizatriptan (-31+/-4 mmHg and -64+/-9 beats min(-1), respectively; both P<0.05 vs vehicle and not significant vs rizatriptan in controls) and sumatriptan (-47+/-8 mmHg and -56+/-10 beats min(-1), respectively; both P<0.05 vs vehicle and not significant vs sumatriptan in controls) were not statistically significantly different from those observed in controls. 7 In conclusion, the 5-HT1B/D receptor agonists, rizatriptan and sumatriptan, elicit hypotension and bradycardia in the normotensive anaesthetized rat predominantly via activation of central 5-HT1A receptors, and a consequent reduction in sympathetic outflow.

Characterization of putative 5-HT7 receptors mediating tachycardia in the cat

1. It has been suggested that the tachycardic response to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in the spinal-transected cat is mediated by '5-HT1-like' receptors since this effect, being mimicked by 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT), is not modified by ketanserin or MDL 72222, but it is blocked by methiothepin, methysergide or mesulergine. The present study was set out to reanalyse this suggestion in terms of the IUPHAR 5-HT receptor classification schemes proposed in 1994 and 1996. 2. Intravenous (i.v.) bolus injections of the tryptamine derivatives, 5-CT (0.01, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10 and 30 microg kg(-1)), 5-HT (3, 10 and 30 microg kg(-1)) and 5-methoxytryptamine (3, 10 and 30 microg kg(-1)) as well as the atypical antipsychotic drug, clozapine (1000 and 3000 microg kg(-1)) resulted in dose-dependent increases in heart rate, with a rank order of agonist potency of 5-CT >> 5-HT > 5-methoxytryptamine >> clozapine. 3. The tachycardic effects of 5-HT and 5-methoxytryptamine were dose-dependently antagonized by i.v. administration of lisuride (30 and 100 microg kg(-1)), ergotamine (100 and 300 microg kg(-1)) or mesulergine (100, 300 and 1000 microg kg(-1)); the highest doses of these antagonists used also blocked the tachycardic effects of 5-CT. Clozapine (1000 and 3000 microg kg(-1)) did not affect the 5-HT-induced tachycardia, but attenuated, with its highest dose, the responses to 5-methoxytryptamine and 5-CT. However, these doses of clozapine as well as the high doses of ergotamine (300 microg kg(-1)) and mesulergine (300 and 1000 microg kg(-1)) also attenuated the tachycardic effects of isoprenaline. In contrast, 5-HT-, 5-methoxytryptamine- and 5-CT-induced tachycardia were not significantly modified after i.v. administration of physiological saline (0.1 and 0.3 ml kg(-1)), the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist, GR127935 (500 microg kg(-1)) or the 5-HT(3/4) receptor antagonist, tropisetron (3000 microg kg(-1)). 4. Intravenous injections of the 5-HT1 receptor agonists, sumatriptan (30, 100 and 300 microg kg(-1)) and indorenate (300 and 1000 microg kg(-1)) or the 5-HT4 receptor (partial) agonist cisapride (300 and 1000 microg kg(-1)) were devoid of effects on feline heart rate per se and failed to modify significantly 5-HT-induced tachycardic responses. 5. Based upon the above rank order of agonist potency, the failure of sumatriptan, indorenate or cisapride to produce cardioacceleration and the blockade by a series of drugs showing high affinity for the cloned 5-ht7 receptor, the present results indicate that the 5-HT receptor mediating tachycardia in the cat is operationally similar to other putative 5-HT7 receptors mediating vascular and non-vascular responses (e.g. relaxation of the rabbit femoral vein, canine external carotid and coronary arteries, rat systemic vasculature and guinea-pig ileum). Since these responses represent functional correlates of the 5-ht7 gene product, the 5-HT7 receptor appellation is reinforced. Therefore, the present experimental model, which is not complicated by the presence of other 5-HT receptors, can be utilized to characterize and develop new drugs with potential agonist and antagonist properties at functional 5-HT7 receptors.

Mediation of 5-HT-induced external carotid vasodilatation in GR 127935-pretreated vagosympathectomized dogs by the putative 5-HT7 receptor

1. The vasodilator effects of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in the external carotid bed of anaesthetized dogs with intact sympathetic tone are mediated by prejunctional sympatho-inhibitory 5-HT1B/1D receptors and postjunctional 5-HT receptors. The prejunctional vasodilator mechanism is abolished after vagosympathectomy which results in the reversal of the vasodilator effect to vasoconstriction. The blockade of this vasoconstrictor effect of 5-HT with the 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist, GR 127935, unmasks a dose-dependent vasodilator effect of 5-HT, but not of sumatriptan. Therefore, the present study set out to analyse the pharmacological profile of this postjunctional vasodilator 5-HT receptor in the external carotid bed of vagosympathectomized dogs pretreated with GR 127935 (20 micrograms kg-1, i.v.). 2. One-minute intracarotid (i.c.) infusions of 5-HT (0.3-30 micrograms min-1), 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT; 0.01-0.3 microgram min-1), 5-methoxytryptamine (1-100 micrograms min-1) and lisuride (3-1000 micrograms min-1) resulted in dose-dependent increases in external carotid blood flow (without changes in blood pressure or heart rate) with a rank order of agonist potency of 5-CT > > 5-HT > or = 5-methoxytryptamine > lisuride, whereas cisapride (100-1000 micrograms min-1, i.c.) was practically inactive. Interestingly, lisuride (mean dose of 85 +/- 7 micrograms kg-1, i.c.), but not cisapride (mean dose of 67 +/- 7 micrograms kg-1, i.c.), specifically abolished the responses induced by 5-HT, 5-CT and 5-methoxytryptamine, suggesting that a common site of action may be involved. In contrast, 1 min i.c. infusions of 8-OH-DPAT (3-3000 micrograms min-1) produced dose-dependent decreases, not increases, in external carotid blood flow and failed to antagonize (mean dose of 200 +/- 33 micrograms kg-1, i.c.) the agonist-induced vasodilator responses. 3. The external carotid vasodilator responses to 5-HT, 5-CT and 5-methoxytryptamine were not modified by intravenous (i.v.) pretreatment with either saline, (+/-)-pindolol (4 mg kg-1) or ritanserin (100 micrograms kg-1) plus granisetron (300 micrograms kg-1), but were dose-dependently blocked by i.v. administration of methiothepin (10 and 30 micrograms kg-1, given after ritanserin plus granisetron), mesulergine (10 and 30 micrograms kg-1), metergoline (1 and 3 mg kg-1), methysergide (1 and 3 mg kg-1) or clozapine (0.3 and 1 mg kg-1). Nevertheless, the blockade of the above responses, not significant after treatment with the lower of the two doses of metergoline and mesulergine, was nonspecific after administration of the higher of the two doses of methysergide and clozapine. 4. Based upon the above rank order of agonist potencies and the antagonism produced by a series of drugs showing high affinity for the cloned 5-ht7 receptor, our results indicate that the 5-HT receptor mediating external carotid vasodilatation in GR 127935-pretreated vagosympathectomized dogs is operationally similar to the putative 5-HT7 receptor mediating relaxation of vascular and non-vascular smooth muscles (e.g. rabbit femoral vein, canine coronary artery, rat systemic vasculature and guinea-pig ileum) as well as tachycardia in the cat.