The effect of training dose on discrimination of compound drug-exteroceptive stimuli

Excitatory conditioning to the interoceptive nicotine stimulus blocks subsequent conditioning to an exteroceptive light stimulus

Previous research has shown that a nicotine conditional stimulus (CS) can compete with (i.e., overshadow) a brief light CS. Another form of competition, blocking, has not yet been examined with the nicotine CS. Groups of rats were assigned to an element training condition. For the N+ group, during each daily 2h element training session, there were ten intravenous nicotine infusions (0.03 mg/kg) followed 30s later with 4s access to sucrose. In the N- group, nicotine and sucrose presentations were explicitly unpaired. The chamber alone group (C alone) had no stimulus presentations. Element training was followed by compound training in all groups. A 30-s houselight was included during the time between the nicotine infusion and paired sucrose delivery. Non-reinforced element presentations assessed relative control of the goal tracking conditioned response (CR). The N+ group showed a higher proportion of CR control by the nicotine than the light. The opposite pattern was found in the N- and C alone groups indicating that nicotine CS controlled less of the CR than the light. Thus, excitatory conditioning with the nicotine CS blocked later conditioning to the light. This finding adds to literature examining the interaction between interoceptive drug CSs and other environmental stimuli.

Nicotine competes with a visual stimulus for control of conditioned responding

Environmental stimuli that co-occur with tobacco use come to evoke drug-related conditioned responses (CRs) that appear involved in continued use of nicotine-containing products. In rats, nicotine can serve as a conditional stimulus (CS) for non-drug unconditioned stimuli (USs), prompting the question of whether the nicotine CS can compete with, or overshadow, a non-drug environmental stimulus for control of a CR. In Experiment 1, male Sprague-Dawley rats were assigned to a group [0, 0.01, 0.03, 0.045, or 0.06 mg nicotine (base)/kg/infusion]. During each session, there were 10 intravenous infusions followed by a 30-second houselight to form a compound CS. At light offset there was 4-second access to sucrose. For Experiment 2, groups were nicotine (0.03 mg/kg/infusion) + light compound paired, nicotine + light compound unpaired, nicotine paired and light unpaired, and nicotine unpaired and light paired. Paired stimuli were presented with sucrose similar to Experiment 1. Unpaired stimuli were temporally separated from sucrose. Following acquisition, tests of nicotine and light alone were conducted by intermixing non-reinforced trails into training sessions. Nicotine dose-dependently overshadowed the light CS as shown by reduced light control of conditioned responding with higher doses. The nicotine, light, and nicotine + light compound had to be paired with sucrose to evoke a CR. These results demonstrate nicotine overshadows an exteroceptive visual stimulus. Because exteroceptive stimuli are often the focus of cue-exposure therapy, such competition may help begin to explain the marginal effectiveness of these therapies.

Effect of drug-paired exteroceptive stimulus presentations on methamphetamine reinstatement in rats

The purpose of the present study was to examine the impact of drug-paired cues on methamphetamine reinstatement. Three groups of rats were trained to self-administer 0.1 mg/kg/infusion methamphetamine. Each methamphetamine infusion was accompanied by a 6 s flashing light+tone stimulus (cues). After training, the groups were then given 12, daily extinction sessions either with or without response-contingent drug-paired cues and then tested for 1 mg/kg i.p. methamphetamine priming-induced reinstatement either with or without cues. Methamphetamine priming significantly reinstated drug-appropriate responding regardless of whether response-contingent cues were omitted during both extinction and testing, presented during both extinction and testing, or omitted during extinction but presented during reinstatement testing. The group in which cues were omitted during extinction and presented during reinstatement exhibited significantly greater reinstatement than did the other two groups. A separate group of rats was also tested demonstrating that response-contingent presentation of previously methamphetamine-paired cues alone, without methamphetamine priming, significantly reinstated drug-appropriate responding. These data show that methamphetamine priming produces a robust reinstatement effect which can be influenced by drug-paired cues.

Inhaled toluene vapor as a discriminative stimulus

Few studies exist exploring the discriminative stimulus effects of inhalants and none that have trained an interoceptive discrimination using the inhaled route. This study was designed to assess if it was possible to train an inhaled toluene discrimination. The second objective was to determine whether the discrimination was based on interoceptive or exteroceptive stimulus effects. Eight B6SJLF1/J mice were trained to discriminate 10 min of exposure to 6000 ppm inhaled toluene vapor from air, using a standard food-reinforced operant procedure. Toluene vapor produced robust, concentration-dependent, discriminative stimulus effects, with concentrations of 4000 ppm and higher producing full substitution. Substitution of inhaled toluene vapor for the training condition was exposure-time dependent. A minimum of 7 min of exposure to 6000 ppm was required to produce complete substitution. Injected intraperitoneal toluene produced dose-dependent full substitution for inhaled toluene vapor. Both inhaled and intraperitoneal ethylbenzene produced similar levels of partial substitution for 6000 ppm toluene vapor. Inhaled isoflurane vapor produced no substitution for toluene vapor. These results show that a toluene vapor discrimination can be successfully trained in mice and the discrimination is selective for toluene compared to ethylbenzene and isoflurane. The results also suggest that the discrimination was likely to have been based primarily on interoceptive rather than exteroceptive stimulus effects.

A comparison of interoceptive and exteroceptive discrimination in the pigeon

In pigeons performing a conditional discrimination under a second-order, color-tracking procedure, stimulus control of responding was established using a blinking versus a nonblinking light as exteroceptive stimuli (light-discrimination group). Another group performing under the same second-order schedule of reinforcement was trained to discriminate the interoceptive stimuli produced by an IM injection of 1.5 mg/kg phencyclidine (PCP) versus saline (drug-discrimination group). In the drug-discrimination group, administration of PCP or pentobarbital resulted in dose-dependent increases in PCP-appropriate responding, while, in general, d-amphetamine did not result in appreciable drug-appropriate responding. In the light-discrimination group, all three drugs over the same dose ranges resulted in decreased discriminative control over responding. In both groups, doses of PCP and pentobarbital which resulted in intermediate (30 to 70%) levels of stimulus-appropriate responding were associated with responding at a single key position rather than tracking a key color. In contrast, intermediate responding after d-amphetamine administration was not associated with position responding in either group. These results emphasize the similarity between discriminative control maintained by interoceptive drug stimuli and exteroceptive visual stimuli.