The unbalanced offspring of the male carriers of the 11q;22q translocation: nondisjunction at meiosis II in a balanced spermatocyte

Inheritance of imbalances in recurrent chromosomal translocation t(11;22): clarification by PGT-SR and sperm-FISH analysis

RESEARCH QUESTION

To analyse why unbalanced viable offspring are derived mainly from the 3:1 segregation mode in t(11;22)(q23;q11.2) reciprocal translocation.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of 24 pre-implantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural re-arrangements (PGT-SR) cycles was performed on seven male and five female carriers of t(11;22) translocation. Sperm analysis was performed on each male carrier. These patients were directed to the study centre after several years of miscarriages and/or abortions, primary infertility for male carriers or birth of an affected child.

RESULTS

Twenty-four PGT-SR cycles were performed to exclude imbalances in both male and female carriers. The unbalanced embryos derived from the adjacent-1 segregation mode were the most represented in both male and female carriers (68.4% and 50%, respectively). These results were positively related with meiotic segregation analysis of reciprocal translocation in spermatozoa. A thorough analysis of the unbalanced embryo karyotypes determined that the expected viable +der22 karyotype resulting from 3:1 malsegregation was less represented at 5.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the divergence that may exist between meiotic segregation and post-zygotic selection. Post-zygotic selection would be responsible for the elimination of unbalanced embryos derived from the adjacent-1 segregation mode. The combined action of several factors occurs at the beginning of post-zygotic selection. Genetic counselling must consider the risk of a birth related to the adjacent-1 segregation mode, irrespective of the sex of the translocation carrier. These results will allow deeper understanding of the PGT results of t(11;22) carriers, which often include a high number of aneuploid embryos.

A unique case of der(11)t(11;22),-22 arising from 3:1 segregation of a maternal t(11;22) in a family with co-segregation of the translocation and breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To report the first tertiary monosomy in a pregnancy loss to a female t(11;22) carrier.

METHODS

The patient was a 34-year-old G10P1 female known to have a balanced translocation t(11;22)(q23;q11.2). She had one female livebirth (a translocation carrier) and eight miscarriages. Five female relatives known to be translocation carriers had a history of breast cancer, three of them premenopausally. The patient herself had a malignant melanoma.

RESULTS

During the 10th pregnancy, ultrasound showed a viable embryo at 6 weeks of gestation, but loss of embryonic heartbeat by 7.5 weeks. Culture of the products of conception at 8 weeks of gestation showed the karyotype: 46,XY,+2,der(11)t(11;22)(q23;q11.2)mat,-22[4]/45,XY,der(11)t(11;22)(q23;q11.2)mat,-22[4], resulting from fertilization of the maternal 3:1 segregation product containing only the der(11) by a normal gamete. Subsequently, she became pregnant with a normal 46,XX fetus. FISH analysis indicated that the breakpoints on 11q and 22q in the patient were in the previously described region common to typical recurrent t(11;22). In addition, a nested-PCR-based approach showed that they were located within the same palindromic AT-rich sequence previously described.

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates that the tertiary monosomy resulting from the 3:1 segregation is compatible with embryonic survival into the first trimester. It is also another example of apparent association of the constitutional translocation t(11;22) and breast cancer.

Preferential alternate segregation in the common t(11;22)(q23;q11) reciprocal translocation: sperm FISH analysis in two brothers

Segregation behaviour studies in t(11;22) carriers have reported controversial results. Whereas some authors have detected a preponderance of 3:1 products, no evidence of such prevalence was found by others. This study reports a fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) segregation analysis on decondensed spermatozoa in two brothers, carriers of the same t(11;22)(q23;q11) rearrangement. Data revealed a similar meiotic segregation pattern in both carriers, 2:2 Alternate segregation being the most frequent (42.94 and 45%), while 3:1 genotypes were the least frequent in both patients, with percentages around 10%. The production of three chiasmata, based on the presence of G-light bands along the translocated segments and the presence of recombination sites at 11q and 22q distal regions, are proposed as the cause of a preponderance of the Alternate segregation. Interchromosomal effects involving chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y were also evaluated. An increased frequency of sex chromosome disomies was detected in one patient. Reviewing the literature, a relationship between this phenomenon and the involvement of acrocentric chromosomes in the reorganization is suggested. FISH segregation and interchromosomal effects studies in spermatozoa are encouraged to gather information to establish the best approach for preimplantational genetic diagnosis in reorganization carriers.

Unusual mosaic karyotype resulting from adjacent 1 segregation of t(11;22): importance of performing skin fibroblast karyotype in patients with unexplained multiple congenital anomalies

We report a patient with a mosaic karyotype resulting from an adjacent 1 segregation of the familial autosomal translocation (11;22). The karyotype seen in fibroblast is 46,XY,der(22)t(11;22)(q23.3;q11.2)/46,XY. No evidence of the abnormal cell line was seen in the cultures obtained from the lymphocytes. The clinical phenotype of the patient does not fit a particular pattern of partial monosomy 22 or partial trisomy 11. There are some features that have been previously reported in patients with trisomy 11q23 --> qter. The mosaic karyotype in our patient could be a result of a series of postzygotic mitotic events of a zygote carrying the der(22) chromosome. These mechanisms involve events that are well documented for several chromosomes. This case underscores the necessity of performing exhaustive cytogenetic analysis in patients with an abnormal phenotype with a family history of a chromosome rearrangement in fibroblast cells if lymphocyte analysis is normal.

Meiotic studies of a human male carrier of the common translocation, t(11;22), suggests postzygotic selection rather than preferential 3:1 MI segregation as the cause of liveborn offspring with an unbalanced translocation

The t(11;22)(q23;q11) translocation is the only non-Robertsonian rearrangement for which there are a large number of unrelated families, apparently with the same breakpoints. These families most often have been ascertained through an abnormal child with the karyotype 47,XX or XY, +der(22) t(11;22)(q23;q11). To explain the high incidence of 3:1 segregants, rarely seen in offspring of carriers of other reciprocal translocations, a number of theoretical models have been suggested. We have used both electron microscope analysis of the synaptonemal complex (SC) and dual-color FISH to investigate the meiotic chromosome behavior in a male carrier of the translocation who has the karyotype 46,XY, t(11;22)(q23;q11). Chromosome synapsis, first-meiotic chiasma configuration, and segregation behavior of this translocation have been analyzed directly. Examination of SCs by electron microscopy showed pachytene-cross formation in 49/50 nuclei. Approximately 50% (26/50) revealed a classical fully synapsed quadrivalent. A proportion of these (10/26), however, showed some central asymmetry, suggesting heterologous synapsis. The remaining cells appeared to have incomplete synapsis. FISH analysis showed only quadrivalents in all 100 metaphase I nuclei. The chiasma frequency was increased within the interstitial segments, in comparison with the same region in normal bivalents. All types of segregation category were found in metaphase II nuclei. There was no indication of preferential 3:1 anaphase I segregation. We conclude that the +der(22) constitution in offspring of carriers of t(11;22)(q23;q11) is not likely to be due to meiotic 3:1 segregation being especially common. Rather, the +der(22) constitution is more likely to be the result of postzygotic selection against other unbalanced karyotypes.

Clustered 11q23 and 22q11 breakpoints and 3:1 meiotic malsegregation in multiple unrelated t(11;22) families

The t(11;22) is the only known recurrent, non-Robertsonian constitutional translocation. We have analyzed t(11;22) balanced-translocation carriers from multiple unrelated families by FISH, to localize the t(11;22) breakpoints on both chromosome 11 and chromosome 22. In 23 unrelated balanced-translocation carriers, the breakpoint was localized within a 400-kb interval between D22S788 (N41) and ZNF74, on 22q11. Also, 13 of these 23 carriers were tested with probes from chromosome 11, and, in each, the breakpoint was localized between D11S1340 and APOA1, on 11q23, to a region </=185 kb. Thus, the breakpoints on both chromosome 11 and chromosome 22 are clustered in multiple unrelated families. Supernumerary-der(22)t(11;22) syndrome can occur in the progeny of balanced-t(11;22) carriers, because of malsegregation of the der(22). There has been speculation regarding the mechanism by which the malsegregation occurs. To elucidate this mechanism, we have analyzed 16 of the t(11;22) families, using short tandem-repeat-polymorphism markers on both chromosome 11 and chromosome 22. In all informative cases the proband received two of three alleles, for markers above the breakpoint on chromosome 22 and below the breakpoint on chromosome 11, from the t(11;22)-carrier parent. These data strongly suggest that 3:1 meiosis I malsegregation in the t(11;22) balanced-translocation-carrier parent is the mechanism in all 16 families. Taken together, these results establish that the majority of t(11;22) translocations occur within the same genomic intervals and that the majority of supernumerary-der(22) offspring result from a 3:1 meiosis I malsegregation in the balanced-translocation carrier.

Unusual segregation of t(11;22) resulting from crossing-over followed by 3:1 disjunction at meiosis I

Reciprocal translocation t(11;22)(q23;q11) is of particular interest because the unbalanced offspring of the translocation carriers usually present with a supernumerary derivative chromosome 22. This common unbalanced karyotype is the result of 3:1 chromosome segregation during meiosis. We report the third case of a rare segregation pattern of a paternal 11;22 translocation. The proband's karyotype revealed the presence of a der(11) and two copies of a der(22), i.e. 47,XX,t(11;22)(q23;q11),+der(22) t(11;22)pat. The karyotype is the result of paternal 3:1 segregation after crossing-over involving the derived and the normal chromosome 22, as revealed by chromosome polymorphism analysis. Contrary to the preferential maternal, transmission of this common unbalanced translocation, the data from the literature, including our case, may suggest preferential paternal transmission of this rare type of unbalanced translocation.

Der(22)t(11;22) resulting from a paternal de novo translocation, adjacent 1 segregation, and maternal heterodisomy of chromosome 22

The t(11;22) (q23;q11) translocation is the most frequently identified familial reciprocal translocation in humans. In translocation carriers, 3:1 meiotic segregation with tertiary trisomy can occur resulting in abnormal progeny with the der(22) as the supernumary chromosome. Affected children have a distinct phenotype with multiple anomalies and severe mental retardation. We have identified a child with developmental delay and multiple anomalies consistent with the der(22) phenotype. Cytogenetic analysis showed an abnormal chromosome complement of 47,XX,+der(22)t(11;22)(q23; q11) in all 50 cells analysed. FISH analysis using chromosome 11 and 22 painting probes showed a pattern consistent with a reciprocal translocation of the distal bands 11q23 and 22q11 respectively. Parental karyotypes were normal. RFLP analysis of locus D22S43, which maps above the t(11;22) breakpoint, showed that the der(22) was paternal in origin and indicated that the normal chromosomes 22 were the probable result of maternal heterodisomy. RFLP analysis of locus D22S94, which maps below the t(11;22) breakpoint, also suggested that both normal chromosomes 22 of the child represented the two maternal homologues. Non-paternity was excluded through the analysis of 10 microsatellite markers distributed on 10 different chromosomes and three VNTRs on three different chromosomes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of a patient with an abnormal karyotype resulting from a de novo translocation in the paternal germline with probable unbalanced adjacent 1 segregation and maternal non-disjunction of chromosome 22 in meiosis I.

Cerebral defects confirm midline developmental field disturbances in supernumerary der(22), t(11;22) syndrome

We describe a girl with midline defects and distal limb anomalies, who had a supernumerary der(22) syndrome. The presence of some anomalies identifying the midline defects, led us to review all patients reported up to now, with interesting results. We point out the particular finding of midline defects in CNS only, in patients studied by autopsy or neuroradiologic imaging.