Intensive therapy for life-threatening medical complications of haematological malignancy

[Role of the intensive care in treatment of patients with acute myeloid leukemia]

AIM

Remission induction can be associate, with the life threatening complications and transfer to ICU of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (pts). We evaluate influence of transfer to ICU and life threatening complication on early mortality and long - tram survival of de novo AML pts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study. All de novo AML pts younger than 60 years old admitted in the National Research Center for Hematology from 2013 to 2016 years were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups: pts who were required ICU admission during remission induction (ICU-pts) and pts who did not require ICU admission and received chemotherapy only in hematology ward (non-ICU pts). The reasons for ICU admissions and results of life support were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, long rank value p.

Acute Respiratory Failure in the Oncologic Patient: New Era, New Issues

Recent decades have seen an increase in the number of patients living with cancer. This trend has resulted in an increase in intensive care unit (ICU) utilization across this population [1]. Acute respiratory failure is the most frequent medical complication leading to critical illness in oncologic patients [2–4]. Historically, there had been a reluctance to admit cancer patients to the ICU given their poor outcomes, particularly in the setting of hematologic malignancy and invasive mechanical ventilation [5]. ICU treatment limitations or refusal of admission was advocated [6]. Major advances in oncologic care, critical care and more meticulous attention to where the conditions overlap, have resulted in marked improvement in short-term survival in this population [1, 7, 8]. Despite these major advances, acute respiratory failure in this population remains complex with unique challenges surrounding diagnosis and management compared to the general ICU population. This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of acute respiratory failure in the oncologic population and highlights specific considerations for the intensivist. We will focus on the important differences between the immunocompromised oncologic patient and general intensive care population, the spectrum of causes of acute respiratory failure with a specific focus on toxicities related to newer cancer therapies, diagnostic approach, management and an up-to-date overview of prognosis.

Six-Month Outcome of Immunocompromised Patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Rescued by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. An International Multicenter Retrospective Study

Rationale: Because encouraging rates for hospital and long-term survival of immunocompromised patients in ICUs have been described, these patients are more likely to receive invasive therapies, like extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).Objectives: To report outcomes of immunocompromised patients treated with ECMO for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and to identify their pre-ECMO predictors of 6-month mortality and main ECMO-related complications.Methods: Retrospective multicenter study in 10 international ICUs with high volumes of ECMO cases. Immunocompromised patients, defined as having hematological malignancies, active solid tumor, solid-organ transplant, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, or long-term or high-dose corticosteroid or immunosuppressant use, and severe ECMO-treated ARDS, from 2008 to 2015 were included.Measurements and Main Results: We collected demographics, clinical data, ECMO-related complications, and ICU- and 6 month-outcome data for 203 patients (median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, 28 [25th-75th percentile, 20-33]; age, 51 [38-59] yr; Pa_O2/Fi_O2, 60 [50-82] mm Hg before ECMO) who fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Six-month survival was only 30%, with a respective median ECMO duration and ICU stay of 8 (5-14) and 25 (16-50) days. Patients with hematological malignancies had significantly poorer outcomes than others (log-rank P = 0.02). ECMO-related major bleeding, cannula infection, and ventilator-associated pneumonia were frequent (36%, 10%, and 50%, respectively). Multivariate analyses retained fewer than 30 days between immunodeficiency diagnosis and ECMO cannulation as being associated with lower 6-month mortality (odds ratio, 0.32 [95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.66]; P = 0.002), and lower platelet count, higher Pco₂, age, and driving pressure as independent pre-ECMO predictors of 6-month mortality.Conclusions: Recently diagnosed immunodeficiency is associated with a much better prognosis in ECMO-treated severe ARDS. However, low 6-month survival of our large cohort of immunocompromised patients supports restricting ECMO to patients with realistic oncological/therapeutic prognoses, acceptable functional status, and few pre-ECMO mortality-risk factors.

Outcomes in adult critically ill cancer patients with and without neutropenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Groupe de Recherche en Réanimation Respiratoire du patient d'Onco-Hématologie (GRRR-OH)

PURPOSE

Whether neutropenia has an impact on the mortality of critically ill cancer patients remains controversial, yet it is widely used as an admission criterion and prognostic factor.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Studies on adult cancer patients and intensive care units were searched on PubMed and Cochrane databases (2005-2015). Summary estimates of mortality risk differences were calculated using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Among the 1,528 citations identified, 38 studies reporting on 6,054 patients (2,097 neutropenic patients) were included. Median mortality across the studies was 54% [45–64], with unadjusted mortality in neutropenic and non-neutropenic critically ill patients of 60% [53–74] and 47% [41–68], respectively. Overall, neutropenia was associated with a 10% increased mortality risk (6%-14%; I² = 50%). The admission period was not associated with how neutropenia affected mortality. Mortality significantly dropped throughout the study decade [−11% (−13.5 to −8.4)]. This mortality drop was observed in non-neutropenic patients [−12.1% (−15.2 to −9.0)] but not in neutropenic patients [−3.8% (−8.1 to +5.6)].

Sensitivity analyses disclosed no differences in underlying malignancy, mechanical ventilation use, or Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor use. Seven studies allowed the adjustment of severity results (1,350 patients). Although pooled risk difference estimates were similar to non-adjusted results, there was no significant impact of neutropenia on mortality (risk difference of mortality, 9%; 95% CI, −15 to +33)

CONCLUSION

Although the unadjusted mortality of neutropenic patients was 11% higher, this effect disappeared when adjusted for severity. Therefore, when cancer patients become critically ill, neutropenia cannot be considered as a decision-making criterion.

Incidence and management of infections in patients with acute leukemia following chemotherapy in general wards

We hypothesise that treating patients with acute leukaemia in general wards, with proper hygienic and sanitary practices, would result in the minimum utilisation of resources as compared with the corresponding patients receiving ICU support. For this study, the acute leukaemia patients on induction chemotherapy were kept in general wards and observed for the incidence of neutropenia, resultant neutropenic febriles, the causative organism, and the effect of empirical antimicrobial treatment protocol on the outcome of such infections. Prophylactic anti-fungal therapy and cotrimoxazole therapy improved the outcome of infections. The therapy of neutropenic fever and infections must be adapted according to the risk factors and should include early empiric antifungal therapy. It was observed that the treatment of such patients in general wards could be managed effectively, with the added advantage of optimum utilisation of resources and in a patient-friendly environment, at a reasonable cost to the patients.

Outcomes in critically ill chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients

BACKGROUND

Although recent studies have demonstrated an improvement in the prognosis of critically ill cancer patients, little is known regarding the prognosis of patients with non-aggressive underlying malignancies. The aims of this study were to assess the prognosis of critically ill patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and to evaluate risk factors for hospital mortality.

METHODS

In retrospective mono-center cohort study, consecutive adult patients with CLL requiring ICU admission from 1997 to 2008 were included.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients of 67 years (62-75) were included. Median time interval between CLL diagnosis and ICU admission was 6.7 years (2.6-10.8). Nine patients (15 %) had stage C disease at the time of ICU admission, and seven patients (11 %) had Richter syndrome. Most ICU admissions were related to bacterial or fungal pulmonary infections (n = 47; 76 %). ICU, in-hospital, and 90-day mortality were 35 % (n = 22), 42 % (n = 26), and 58 % (n = 36), respectively. Only three factors were independently associated with in-hospital mortality: oxygen saturation lower than 95 % when breathing room air (odds ratio (OR) 5.80; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.23-27.33), need for vasopressors (OR 27.94; 95 % CI 5.37-145.4), and past history of infection (OR 6.62; 95 % CI 1.34-32.68). The final model did not change when disease-related variables (Binet classification, Richter syndrome, long-term steroids) or treatment-related variables (fludarabine, rituximab, or alemtuzumab) were included.

CONCLUSION

Acute pulmonary infections remain the leading cause of ICU admission in patients with CLL. The severity at ICU admission and past history of infection were the only factors associated with hospital mortality. Neither disease characteristics nor previous cancer treatments were associated with outcome.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia admitted to intensive care: a case-control study

Background

There is limited epidemiologic data on patients with acute myelogenous (myeloid) leukemia (AML) requiring life-sustaining therapies in the intensive care unit (ICU). Our objectives were to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes in critically ill AML patients.

Methods

This was a retrospective case-control study. Cases were defined as adult patients with a primary diagnosis of AML admitted to ICU at the University of Alberta Hospital between January 1^st 2002 and June 30^th 2008. Each case was matched by age, sex, and illness severity (ICU only) to two control groups: hospitalized AML controls, and non-AML ICU controls. Data were extracted on demographics, course of hospitalization, and clinical outcomes.

Results

In total, 45 AML patients with available data were admitted to ICU. Mean (SD) age was 54.8 (13.1) years and 28.9% were female. Primary diagnoses were sepsis (32.6%) and respiratory failure (37.3%). Mean (SD) APACHE II score was 30.3 (10.3), SOFA score 12.6 (4.0) with 62.2% receiving mechanical ventilation, 55.6% vasoactive therapy, and 26.7% renal replacement therapy. Crude in-hospital, 90-day and 1-year mortality was 44.4%, 51.1% and 71.1%, respectively. AML cases had significantly higher adjusted-hazards of death (HR 2.23; 95% CI, 1.38-3.60, p = 0.001) compared to both non-AML ICU controls (HR 1.69; 95% CI, 1.11-2.58, p = 0.02) and hospitalized AML controls (OR 1.0, reference variable). Factors associated with ICU mortality by univariate analysis included older age, AML subtype, higher baseline SOFA score, no change or an increase in early SOFA score, shock, vasoactive therapy and mechanical ventilation. Active chemotherapy in ICU was associated with lower mortality.

Conclusions

AML patients may represent a minority of all critically ill admissions; however, are not uncommonly supported in ICU. These AML patients are characterized by high illness severity, multi-organ dysfunction, and high treatment intensity and have a higher risk of death when compared with matched hospitalized AML or non-AML ICU controls. The absence of early improvement in organ failure may be a useful predictor for mortality for AML patients admitted to ICU.

Predictors of short and long-term outcome in patients with hematological disorders admitted to the intensive care unit for a life-threatening complication

GOAL OF WORK

The admission of patients with hematological disorders to the intensive care unit (ICU) involves a complex resource usage and may be associated with high mortality. The decision making to transfer a severely ill patient to the ICU, therefore, presents an ethical dilemma. We assessed both early and long-term outcomes in relation to clinical characteristics with the aim to facilitate clinical decision making.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a cohort study of hematological patients admitted to ICU at a university hospital.

MAIN RESULTS

During a 6-year period (1996-2001), 85 patients with a median age of 59 years were admitted to ICU. The majority of patients (88%) suffered from hematological malignancies. Major reasons for ICU admission were respiratory failure (41%) and septic shock/pre-shock (24%). The median duration of ICU admission was 2 (1-67) days. Crude in-ICU, 30-day, and 6-month mortality rates were 30, 49, and 62%, respectively. Overall 5-year survival rate was 20%, and 13 (15%) patients were alive at time of follow-up (median 7.4 years). Respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support and a high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was significantly correlated to high in-ICU mortality, but not to long-term outcome. Type of hematological malignancy, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, bacteremia, prior administration of chemotherapy, age, or gender was not significantly associated with outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study provides encouraging results on long-term post-ICU outcome also in elderly patients with hematological diseases. For a substantial proportion of critically ill hematological patients, a short time care at an ICU is lifesaving. These patients should be offered intensive care unless or until it is clear that there is little prospect of recovery from the acute illness or that the underlying malignancy cannot be controlled.

Outcome of cancer patients considered for intensive care unit admission: a hospital-wide prospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of cancer patients considered for admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospective, one-year hospital-wide study of all cancer and hematology patients, including bone marrow transplantation patients, for whom admission to the ICU was requested.

RESULTS

Of the 206 patients considered for ICU admission, 105 patients (51%) were admitted. Of the 101 patients who were not admitted, 54 patients (26.2%) were considered too sick to benefit, and 47 patients (22.8%) were considered to be too well to benefit from the ICU. Of these 47 patients, 13 patients were admitted later. Survival rates after 30 and 180 days were significantly associated with admission status (P < .0001). Remission of the malignancy (odds ratio [OR], 3.37; 95% CI, 1.25 to 9.07) was independently associated with ICU admission, whereas poor chronic health status (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.74) and solid tumor (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.78) were associated with ICU refusal. In admitted patients, 30-day and 6-month survival rates were 54.3% and 32.4%, respectively. Of the patients considered too sick to benefit from ICU admission, 26% were alive on day 30 and 16.7% on day 180. Among patients considered too well to benefit, the 30-day survival rate was a worrisome 78.7%. Calibration of the Mortality Probability Model (the only score available at triage) was of limited value for predicting 30-day survival (area under the curve, 0.62).

CONCLUSION

Both the excess mortality in too-well patients later admitted to the ICU and the relatively good survival in too-sick patients suggest the need for a broader admission policy.

Patients with haematological malignancies requiring invasive mechanical ventilation: differences between survivors and non-survivors in intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Mortality of patients with haematological malignancies requiring intensive therapy is high. We wanted to establish reasons for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and treatment as well as outcome in subjects who required invasive mechanical ventilation. We were also interested in differences between ICU survivors and non-survivors at the moment of admission.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty patients (21 women and 19 men) were included in the study. Median of age was 42 (range 16-73) years. All patients required mechanical ventilation. We analysed age, gender, disease character (acute/chronic), diagnosed pneumonia, multiple organ failure (MOF), history of bone marrow transplantation, peripheral blood parameters (leukocyte, neutrocyte, erythrocyte and thrombocyte counts, haemoglobin level and haematocrit), mean arterial pressure (obtained through direct measurement), necessity of catecholamine administration and symptoms of the acute renal insufficiency at the moment of ICU admission.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-five percent of patients died in ICU. Intergroup comparisons between survivors and non-survivors revealed statistically significant differences in the presence of neutropenia, thrombocyte count, mean arterial pressure and the necessity of catecholamines administration, as well as scores obtained through patient evaluation according to the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and the New Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) scales. Multivariate logistic regression revealed only one independent risk factor for ICU mortality in the analysed group--SAPS II score (p=0.009). Calculated value of the unitary odds ratio was 1.065 (95% confidence interval 1.017-1.116).

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality of patients with haematological malignancies requiring intensive mechanical ventilation remains high. Scoring with the SAPS II system was a useful tool for determination of ICU mortality risk in those patients.

Outcome in Noninvasively and Invasively Ventilated Hematologic Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The survival rate of patients with a hematologic malignancy requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) in the ICU has improved over the last few decades. The objective of this study was to identify the factors affecting the in-hospital mortality of these particular patients, and to assess whether the use of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) was protective in our study population.

DESIGN

We retrospectively collected variables in 166 consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies who had acute respiratory failure (ARF) requiring MV, and identified factors obtained within 24 h of ICU admission affecting in-hospital mortality in univariate and multivariate stepwise logistic regression analyses. The effect of NPPV on mortality was assessed using a pair-wise matched exposed-unexposed analysis.

RESULTS

The mean simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II was 58.9. The in-hospital mortality rate was 71%. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the in-hospital mortality rate was predicted by increasing severity of illness, as measured by SAPS II (odds ratio [OR] per point of increase, 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.11) and a diagnosis of acute myelogenous leukemia (OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.05 to 7.11). Female sex (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.82), endotracheal intubation (ETI) within 24 h of ICU admission (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.78), and recent bacteremia (defined as blood cultures positive for bacteria < 48h before or < 24h after ICU admission) [OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.61] were associated with a lower mortality rate. Twenty-seven patients who received NPPV were matched for SAPS II (+/- 3) with 52 patients who required immediate ETI on a 1:2 basis. The crude in-hospital mortality rate was 65.4% in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Although the in-hospital mortality rate in hematologic patients who develop ARF remains high, the reluctance to intubate and start treatment with invasive MV in this population is unjustified, especially when bacteremia has precipitated ICU admission.

Outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia and pulmonary infiltrates requiring invasive mechanical ventilation—a retrospective analysis

PURPOSE

To assess the prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and pulmonary infiltrates requiring mechanical ventilation.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A medical intensive care unit (ICU) in an academic tertiary care center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 30 consecutive patients with acute myeloid leukemia and pulmonary infiltrates who received invasive mechanical ventilation and compared clinical and laboratory parameters between ICU survivors and ICU non-survivors using non-parametric statistics.

RESULTS

The overall mortality rate was 87% (26/30). The survival was 40 % (4/10) for patients aged 50 years or less while none (0/20) of the patients older than 50 years survived (P <.02). The median time of mechanical ventilation in survivors was 23.5 (3-45) days. No differences between survivors and non-survivors were observed for the APACHE II score, oxygenation quotient, liver function tests, creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, or prognostic parameters of acute myeloid leukemia (presence of blasts on bone marrow aspirate, cytogenetic studies, and intensity of the chemotherapy regimen).

CONCLUSIONS

Age seems to be an important prognostic parameter in our cohort of 30 consecutive patients with acute myeloid leukemia and pulmonary infiltrates requiring mechanical ventilation. Prolonged ventilation does not preclude survival.

Intensive care unit outcomes in elderly cancer patients

As the number of elderly patients receiving oncologic therapies increases, the need for better outcome predictors for the critically ill elderly with cancer increases. Physicians should not view age as an indicator of poor ICU outcome, as many elderly patients with cancer will derive the same benefit from intensive care as their younger counterparts. Such a gain can be accomplished without overuse of valuable resources. Similar prognostic factors that are applied to the younger cancer patients should also be applied to the elderly. These parameters, in addition to clinical judgment, can be helpful in deciding who will benefit from ICU care regardless of age. Oncologists and critical care physicians will need to collaborate and change the paradigm of ICU care for the elderly.

Outcome analysis of 189 consecutive cancer patients referred to the intensive care unit as emergencies during a 2-year period

The referral of critically ill cancer patients to an intensive care unit (ICU) is a matter of controversial debate. This study was conducted by an interdisciplinary clinical group to evaluate the outcome of ICU treatment in cancer patients according to their characteristics at the time of referral. A retrospective analysis was used to identify relevant subgroups among 189 consecutive cancer patients referred as emergencies to one of four ICUs during a 2-year period. Reasons for ICU referral were pneumonia (29.6%), sepsis (27.0%), fungal infection (11.1%), another infection (9.5%), gastrointestinal emergency (16.9%), treatment-related organ toxicity (6.9%), or other, non-infectious complications (43.9%). Vasopressor support was required in 50.3%, mechanical ventilation in 49.7%, and haemodialysis/-filtration in 26.5% of the patients. Overall, 41.3% died during ICU treatment, 12.2% died after transfer from ICU to a non-ICU ward, and 35.4% were discharged alive. Sepsis, mechanical ventilation, vasopressor support, renal replacement therapy and neutropenia were independent risk factors for fatal outcome, but no single risk factor unequivocally predicted death. All patients with fungal infection who required vasopressor support and either had sepsis (n=13) or needed mechanical ventilation (n=14) died during ICU treatment, while all non-septic patients. who did not require mechanical ventilation, were younger than 74 years of age and had a non-infectious underlying complication (n=29), survived. This analysis may help to early identify relevant subgroups of cancer patients with different prognoses under ICU treatment. A prospective study to confirm the predictive usefulness of this approach is needed. Cancer patients should not be excluded from referral to the intensive care unit in an emergency solely due to their underlying malignant disease or a single unfavourable prognostic factor.

Multiple organ failure and outcome of critically ill patients with haematological malignancy

BACKGROUND

The number of failing organs systems in ICU patients with haematological malignancy is associated with outcome. The objective of this study was to assess short and long-term survival in these patients with special reference to multiple organ failure reflected by the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of haematological patients admitted to the 10-bed intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary level academic teaching hospital from 1994 to 1998. Of 31 admitted patients with the diagnosis of haematological malignancy, the charts of 30 were available for analysis.

RESULTS

Univariate logistic regression analysis of factors previously shown to influence survival revealed that only admission SOFA score and untreated status of haematological disease were significantly associated with survival (P < 0.05). ICU, 3-month and one-year survival rates were 57% (17/30), 23% (7/30) and 20% (6/30), respectively. If maximal SOFA score during the ICU stay was included in a multivariate model comprising treatment status and effect, admission day SOFA and APACHE II scores, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy and neutropenia, the maximal SOFA score became the only independent variable. All patients with an admission SOFA score exceeding 11 died in hospital. Leave-one-out method revealed that admission SOFA scores and the status of haematological disease (untreated or not) correctly classified 83% (25 of 30) of patients to survivors or non-survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple organ failure assessed as SOFA score on admission and status of disease were associated with outcome in critically ill patients with haematological malignancy.

Outcome and early prognostic indicators in patients with a hematologic malignancy admitted to the intensive care unit for a life-threatening complication

OBJECTIVES

To assess the outcome and to identify early prognostic indicators in a global population of patients with hematologic malignancy admitted to the intensive care unit for a life-threatening complication.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

SETTING

Medical intensive care unit at a tertiary university hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 124 consecutive critically ill patients with a hematologic malignancy admitted to the intensive care unit during a 3.5-yr period. MEASUREMENTS We collected variables at admission and during admission and identified predictors of in-hospital mortality by stepwise logistic regression analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 26 +/- 7.7. Sixty-one percent had a high-grade malignancy, and 27% had active disease. Thirty-five percent were leukopenic (leukocyte count, <1.0 x 10(9)/L) at admission. Respiratory failure (48%), sepsis (18.5%), and neurologic impairment (17%) were the major reasons for admission at the intensive care unit. Seventy-one percent of the patients required ventilatory support for a median duration of 6 (3-17) days, 46% received vasopressors at admission, and 26.6% needed renal replacement therapy during their intensive care unit stay. A recent bacteremia precipitating intensive care unit admission was found in 21.8% of the patients. Crude intensive care unit, in-hospital, and 6-month mortality rates were 42%, 54%, and 66%, respectively. Four variables were independently associated with outcome in a multivariate logistic regression analysis: leukopenia (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-7.7), vasopressors (odds ratio, 3.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-9.8), and urea of >0.75 g/L (>12 mmol/L) (odds ratio, 9.4; 95% confidence interval, 4.2-26) at admission were associated with poor outcome, whereas recent bacteremia (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.58) was associated with better prognosis. Using these variables, we arbitrarily categorized our population into three groups for survival analysis: a low-risk group (low urea with or without either leukopenia or vasopressors, n = 60), an intermediate-risk group (high urea or a combination of leukopenia and vasopressors, n = 34), and a high-risk group (high urea in combination with leukopenia or vasopressors, n = 27). Patients with a bacteremia prompting intensive care unit admission were allocated to a one-step-lower risk group. Survival probabilities at 30 days and 6 months were 75% and 55% in the first group, 35% and 21% in the second group, and 4% and 0%, respectively, in the third group ( <.001).

CONCLUSION

The general reluctance to admit patients with a hematologic malignancy to the intensive care unit, even with severe critical illness, is unjustified. However, we identified four early predictors of outcome that may be of value in deciding in which patients advanced or prolonged support should not be continued.

Prognosis of hematologic malignancies does not predict intensive care unit mortality

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the correlation between specific prognosis of hematologic malignancies on the one hand and intensive care unit and hospital mortality in critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies on the other hand.

DESIGN

Observational study during a 10-yr period.

SETTING

A 22-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit.

PATIENTS

A total of 84 consecutive patients with nonterminal hematologic malignancies with medical complications requiring intensive care.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS

Demographic factors, acute physiology and organ dysfunction scores, microbiology, therapeutic support, and hematologic factors data on admission and during the intensive care unit stay were collected, together with mortality follow-up. Based on specific-disease prognostic factors and related published survival curves, the prognosis of hematologic malignancies was assessed and defined as good, intermediate, or poor according to a 3-yr survival probability of >50%, 20-50%, or <20%, respectively.

MAIN RESULTS

Prognosis of hematologic malignancies does not predict intensive care unit or hospital mortality and almost reaches significance for 6-mo mortality (53%, 71%, and 84% rate for patients with good, intermediate, and poor prognosis, respectively, p =.058), but it determines long-term survival (p =.008). Intensive care unit, hospital, and 6-mo overall mortality rates were 38%, 61%, and 75%, respectively. Using multivariate analysis, intensive care unit mortality was best predicted on admission by respiratory failure and fungal infection, whereas hospital mortality was predicted by the number of organ failures, the bone marrow transplant status, and the presence of fungal infection. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II had no prognostic value, whereas the difference of the Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score between at the time of admission and at day 5 allowed quick prediction of hospital mortality. Diseases with the poorest 6-mo prognosis were acute myeloid leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. CONCLUSION The severity of the underlying hematologic malignancies does not influence intensive care unit or hospital mortality. Short-term prognosis is exclusively predicted by acute organ dysfunctions and by a pathogen's aggressiveness. Therefore, reluctance to admit patients with nonterminal hematologic malignancies to the intensive care unit based only on the prognosis of their underlying hematologic malignancy does not seem justified.

Outcome and prognostic factors in critically ill cancer patients admitted to the intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

To assess survival in cancer patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with respect to the nature of malignancy, cause of ICU admittance, and course during ICU stay as well as to evaluate the prognostic value of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III score.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

ICU at a university cancer referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 414 cancer patients admitted to the ICU during a period of 66 months.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS

Charts of the patients were analyzed with respect to underlying disease, cause of admission, APACHE III score, need and duration of mechanical ventilation, neutropenia and development of septic shock, as well as ICU survival and survival after discharge. Mortality data were compared with two control groups: 1362 patients admitted to our ICU suffering from diseases other than cancer and 2,776 cancer patients not admitted to the ICU.

MAIN RESULTS

ICU survival was 53%, and 1-yr survival was 23%. The 1-yr mortality rate was significantly lower in both control groups. Patients admitted after bone marrow transplantation had the highest mortality. In a multivariate analysis, prognosis was negatively influenced by respiratory insufficiency, the need of mechanical ventilation, and development of septic shock during the ICU stay. Admission after cardiopulmonary resuscitation yielded high ICU mortality but a relatively good long-term prognosis. Admission after surgery and as a result of acute hemorrhage was associated with a good prognosis. Age, neutropenia, and underlying disease did not influence outcome significantly. Admission APACHE III scores were significantly higher in nonsurvivors but failed to predict individual outcome satisfactorily. All patients with APACHE III scores of >80 died at the ICU.

CONCLUSION

A combination of factors must be taken into account to estimate a critically ill cancer patient's prognosis in the ICU. The APACHE III scoring system alone should not be used to make decisions about therapy prolongation. Admission to the ICU worsens the prognosis of a cancer patient substantially; however, as ICU mortality is 47%, comparable with severely ill noncancer patients, general reluctance to admit cancer patients to an ICU does not seem to be justified.

Paediatric oncology and intensive care treatments: changing trends

OBJECTIVES

To review the outcome of patients with childhood malignancy requiring intensive care treatment and to assess whether there is any secular trend for improved outcome.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart reviews of 74 consecutive admissions to a paediatric intensive care unit from a regional paediatric oncology centre between 1990 and 1997. During the same period there were 6419 admissions to the oncology unit, 814 of whom were new cases.

RESULTS

The overall survival at discharge from the intensive care unit was 49 of 74. Patients with either systemic or respiratory infection requiring ventilation had the poorest survival (13 of 31) whereas postoperative patients had the best survival (15 of 15). However, patients with respiratory or systemic infection who required inotropic support with more than three agents all died compared with about one quarter of those needing no inotrope. All patients with systemic or respiratory infective illness were neutropenic and positive microbiological identification was possible in 13 of 21 and five of 18, respectively. Non-survivors had a higher mean acute physiology and chronic health evaluation system (APACHE-II) score than survivors (24.2 v 15.94, respectively) but no patient with a score of > 27 survived.

CONCLUSION

Compared with previous series, there has been a great improvement in survival of oncology patients admitted to the intensive care unit especially those with either systemic or respiratory infection needing ventilation. Full intensive care treatment should be provided for these patients.

Inflammatory mediators in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and plasma in leukocytopenic patients with septic shock-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVES

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a frequent complication of severe sepsis and a major cause of death in patients with hematologic malignancy during chemotherapy-induced leukocytopenia. Inflammatory mediators are important modulators of host response to injury and have been found to be increased in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid of nonleukocytopenic patients with ARDS. Since inflammatory cytokines in plasma of nonleukocytopenic patients seem to be efficient predictors of the course of ARDS, we examined this hypothesis in leukocytopenic patients with septic shock-induced ARDS.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational study.

SETTING

Intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Nineteen patients with leukocytopenia (white blood cell count of <1/nL) following cytoreductive chemotherapy for malignant disorders and severe sepsis with shock-induced ARDS (Murray score of >2.5).

INTERVENTIONS

BAL and plasma sampling and ICU management.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-8 were measured in the BAL aspirates and in plasma samples, both obtained within 18 hrs after onset of ARDS. Hemodynamic and oxygen metabolism data were measured immediately before plasma samples were taken and BAL was performed. Of the 19 patients studied, nine patients responded to ICU treatment (e.g., mechanical ventilation as indicated by PaO2/FIO2, FIO2, shunt volume, and course of pulmonary infiltrates), whereas ten patients did not respond. BAL cytokine concentrations were significantly increased in nonresponders in comparison with responding patients (TNF-alpha, p = .021; IL-6, p = .008; IL-8, p = .019). In contrast, we did not observe any differences between the groups in terms of plasma cytokine concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Determination of cytokine concentrations in BAL samples may be useful for evaluation of severity and course of ARDS in leukocytopenic patients, whereas measurement of plasma cytokines is not helpful.

Severity-of-illness scores for neutropenic cancer patients in an intensive care unit: Which is the best predictor? Do multiple assessment times improve the predictive value?

OBJECTIVES

To use three severity of illness scores to estimate the probability of hospital mortality among patients with cancer and neutropenia; to compare the performance of these scores, calculated at admission to an intensive care unit (ICU); and to test the improvement in estimation obtained by taking into account the first 72-hr period.

DESIGN

Collection of data for every neutropenic patient hospitalized in the ICU during a 4-yr period.

SETTING

A comprehensive cancer center.

PATIENTS

Ninety-four patients were neutropenic at ICU admission. Their vital status was measured at hospital discharge.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II improved the estimation of hospital mortality compared with the original SAPS score. Using a simple score based on the number of acute organ system failures (OSFs) to classify the patients, good discrimination between survivors and nonsurvivors was observed (area under the receiver operating characteristic curves, 79 +/- 5 [SD] %). The relationship between successive scores and outcome was explored using recursive partitioning. Patients were first classified according to their OSF value on the first day of hospitalization in the ICU with a cutoff of two organ failures, and classification was then improved by taking into account the OSF score on the third day.

CONCLUSIONS

For cancer patients hospitalized in an ICU for a neutropenic episode, the severity of illness and the risk of death can be accurately assessed by the SAPS II score and the number of acute organ failures at admission. The OSF values on the first and third days of hospitalization both provided information, allowing the classification of patients into groups with different probabilities of hospital mortality.

Prognostic factors for neutropenic patients in an intensive care unit: respective roles of underlying malignancies and acute organ failures

The admission of neutropenic patients to an intensive care unit (ICU) is still controversial, especially if mechanical ventilation is required. To avoid useless stays in ICU, the evaluation of the respective role of the underlying malignancy and acute organ failures might be useful for better definition of the categories of patients who could benefit from aggressive ICU support. For this purpose, we carried out a retrospective study of the charts of 107 consecutive neutropenic patients admitted to an ICU in a comprehensive cancer centre over a four-year period. The following characteristics were recorded within 24 h of admission: patient data, characteristics of neutropenia and the underlying malignancy, the type and number of organ system failures (OSFs) and simplified acute physiological scores (SAPS and SAPS II). The impact of each variable on outcome in the ICU was studied by univariate and multivariate (logistic regression) analysis. 59 patients died in the ICU (mortality rate: 55%). Patients with a haematological malignancy (n = 57, 53%) were more likely to experience respiratory failure, an underlying malignancy deemed rapidly fatal, and to have longer lasting neutropenia than patients with a solid tumour (n = 50, 47%). However, the mortality rate did not differ in the two groups (haematological malignancy 61% versus solid tumour 48%, p = 0.16). Respiratory and cardiovascular organ failure (p < 0.001 for both) correlated with mortality in the ICU. In the multiple logistic regression model, only the number of organ system failures and respiratory failure remained predictive of ICU mortality. In conclusion, the characteristics of the underlying malignancy are not relevant when deciding whether or not neutropenic patients should be admitted to an ICU. The main risk factors for death in an ICU are the number of organ failures on admission, and among them the presence of respiratory failure.

Early tracheotomy in neutropenic, mechanically ventilated patients: rationale and results of a pilot study

Despite substantial advances in the management of such patients, the prognosis of ventilated neutropenic patients remains grim. The objective of our study was to evaluate the benefit of tracheotomy in this category of patients, in terms of mortality while they were in the intensive-care unit and nosocomial pneumonias. The charts of 53 consecutive, ventilated, neutropenic patients, or those destined to be imminently neutropenic, admitted to our intensive-care unit during a 4-year period, have been retrospectively reviewed. Tracheotomy was performed at the bedside or in the operating room: 20 patients underwent tracheotomy within 48 h of mechanical ventilation (ET group), while 33 were tracheotomized later or remained intubated (INT group). The two groups were comparable with regard to the underlying disease, respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation patterns and severity scores, but neutropenia was more profound in the ET group. Mortality while in the intensive-care unit was similar (ET: 70%; INT: 78.8%). However, the survival curves showed a trend towards longer survival in the ET group, even after adjustment for the degree of neutropenia (log-rank test: P = 0.07). The incidence of pneumonias was similar in both groups. No major complications of tracheotomy were reported. These findings suggest that a tracheotomy could be proposed for neutropenic patients requiring mechanical ventilation, in order to prolong their survival beyond the end of the neutropenic period. A prospective study is underway to confirm these preliminary results.

Intensive care and oncology

Intensive care is increasingly used in the management of cancer patients. The main reasons for admitting a cancer patient to an intensive-care unit are postoperative recovery, critical complications of the cancer disease and its treatment, the administration and monitoring of intensive anticancer treatment, and acute disease unrelated to cancer or its treatment. The present review is focused on the prognosis of critically ill cancer patients, on the description of the types of complications requiring intensive care, on specific aspects of the application of critical-care techniques in cancer patients, on ethical considerations and on ICU organization in the context of oncology.

Outcome of recipients of bone marrow transplants who require intensive-care unit support

To determine the outcome and prognostic factors associated with bone marrow transplantation (BMT), we reviewed the clinical course of 35 adult recipients of such a transplant who were admitted to our intensive-care unit (ICU). This constituted 24% of patients who underwent BMT for treatment of hematologic disorders during the study period. The reasons for admission to the ICU were postsurgical care in 5, respiratory failure in 25, shock in 4, and renal failure in 1. The in-hospital mortality was 20% for the postsurgical patients and 87% for the others. None of the postsurgical patients required mechanical ventilation, whereas 90% of the others did, and the associated mortality was 93%. Infection was the cause of the respiratory failure in all but 3 of the 25 patients and was associated with 95% mortality. Complications that involved multiple organs increased the mortality to 100%. No significant differences were found in age, sex, type of BMT, serologic tests for cytomegalovirus, history of graft-versus-host disease, conditioning regimen for BMT, and duration of stay in the ICU and the hospital between survivors and nonsurvivors. The APACHE II (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) prognostic scoring system underestimated mortality and had no correlation with the duration of stay in the ICU or the hospital. Vasopressors, total parenteral nutrition, and transfusion of blood components in the ICU had no influence on the outcome. Open-lung biopsy was helpful in making specific diagnoses, and pulmonary artery catheters were used in most patients to guide therapy but did not improve survival.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Prognostic assessment of the acute complications of bone marrow transplantation requiring intensive therapy

Patients with bone marrow transplant may present with acute, life-threatening complications which frequently (40% of our cases) require intensive care unit treatment and result in an increased mortality (76% in this series). In an attempt to reach a more objective prognostic assessment, we have analyzed those factors related to the worst outcome in the 25 patients with bone marrow transplant admitted into our intensive care unit. Respiratory failure was the most frequent complication (72%), with an 83% mortality. Graft-versus-host disease and neutropenia led to a greater number of infectious complications with a poor outcome. Failure of more than three organ systems, septic shock and mechanical ventilation were statistically associated with mortality (p less than 0.05), and all patients who required mechanical ventilation for more than seven days or needed intensive therapy for more than 10 days died. The presence of septic shock, multisystem failure and severe neutropenia on admission should be considered as initial indicators of a poor prognosis. More than 7 days of mechanical ventilation and an intensive care unit stay of more than 10 days could be critical points in the reassessment of the intensity and prolongation of treatment.

Prognosis of patients receiving intensive care for lifethreatening medical complications of haematological malignancy

The mortality of patients admitted to intensive care units with haematological malignancy is high. A humane approach to the management of the critically ill as well as efficient use of limited resources requires careful selection of those patients who are most likely to benefit from intensive care. To delineate more accurately the factors influencing outcome in these patients the records of 60 consecutive admissions to the intensive care unit (37 male, 23 female) with haematological malignancy were reviewed retrospectively. Fifty patients were in acute respiratory failure, most commonly (34 patients) with a combination of pneumonia and septicaemic shock. The severity of the acute illness was assessed by the APACHE II (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II) score and number of organ systems affected. Thirteen patients survived to leave hospital. The mortality of patients with haematological malignancy was consistently higher than predicted from a large validation study of APACHE II in a mixed population of critically ill patients. Moreover, no patient with an APACHE II score of greater than 26 survived. Mortality among the 22 patients with relapsed malignancy (21 deaths), was significantly higher than among the 35 patients at first presentation (26 deaths). On discharge from the intensive care unit all survivors had responded well to chemotherapy and had normal or raised peripheral white cell counts. They included seven patients who had recovered from leucopenia (white cell count less than 0.5 X 10(9)/l). In contrast, 36 of the 47 patients who died were leucopenic at the time of death. The overall mortality of critically ill patients with haematological malignancy is higher than equivalently ill patients without cancer. The dysfunction of an increasing number of organ systems, an APACHE II score of greater than 30, failure of the malignancy to respond to chemotherapy, and persistent leucopenia all point to a poor outcome.

Role of intensive care unit in a medical oncology department

Over a 4-year period, 912 patients were admitted to the ICU of the medical oncology service at the Institut Jules Bordet: 574 (63%) were admitted for medical emergencies and 338 (37%) for intensive treatment and/or monitoring. In the first group, the main causes of admission were hypercalcemia, thromboembolic disease, cardiac arhythmias, encephalopathies and pneumopathies. Overall mortality during the ICU stay was 23% (133/574). In the second group, patients were admitted primarily in order to receive, under optimal surveillance, anticancer treatment, either because they were at high risk of complications or because the approach was mainly investigational; several investigations, in the fields of supportive care and anticancer treatment, were successfully conducted within the ICU environment.