The ral gene of phage lambda. I. Identification of a non-essential gene that modulates restriction and modification in E. coli

Type I toxin-antitoxin systems in bacteria: from regulation to biological functions

Toxin-antitoxin systems are ubiquitous in the prokaryotic world and widely distributed among chromosomes and mobile genetic elements. Several different toxin-antitoxin system types exist, but what they all have in common is that toxin activity is prevented by the cognate antitoxin. In type I toxin-antitoxin systems, toxin production is controlled by an RNA antitoxin and by structural features inherent to the toxin messenger RNA. Most type I toxins are small membrane proteins that display a variety of cellular effects. While originally discovered as modules that stabilize plasmids, chromosomal type I toxin-antitoxin systems may also stabilize prophages, or serve important functions upon certain stress conditions and contribute to population-wide survival strategies. Here, we will describe the intricate RNA-based regulation of type I toxin-antitoxin systems and discuss their potential biological functions.

Systematic and scalable genome-wide essentiality mapping to identify nonessential genes in phages

Phages are one of the key ecological drivers of microbial community dynamics, function, and evolution. Despite their importance in bacterial ecology and evolutionary processes, phage genes are poorly characterized, hampering their usage in a variety of biotechnological applications. Methods to characterize such genes, even those critical to the phage life cycle, are labor intensive and are generally phage specific. Here, we develop a systematic gene essentiality mapping method scalable to new phage-host combinations that facilitate the identification of nonessential genes. As a proof of concept, we use an arrayed genome-wide CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) assay to map gene essentiality landscape in the canonical coliphages λ and P1. Results from a single panel of CRISPRi probes largely recapitulate the essential gene roster determined from decades of genetic analysis for lambda and provide new insights into essential and nonessential loci in P1. We present evidence of how CRISPRi polarity can lead to false positive gene essentiality assignments and recommend caution towards interpreting CRISPRi data on gene essentiality when applied to less studied phages. Finally, we show that we can engineer phages by inserting DNA barcodes into newly identified inessential regions, which will empower processes of identification, quantification, and tracking of phages in diverse applications.

Bacteriophage strategies for overcoming host antiviral immunity

Phages and their bacterial hosts together constitute a vast and diverse ecosystem. Facing the infection of phages, prokaryotes have evolved a wide range of antiviral mechanisms, and phages in turn have adopted multiple tactics to circumvent or subvert these mechanisms to survive. An in-depth investigation into the interaction between phages and bacteria not only provides new insight into the ancient coevolutionary conflict between them but also produces precision biotechnological tools based on anti-phage systems. Moreover, a more complete understanding of their interaction is also critical for the phage-based antibacterial measures. Compared to the bacterial antiviral mechanisms, studies into counter-defense strategies adopted by phages have been a little slow, but have also achieved important advances in recent years. In this review, we highlight the numerous intracellular immune systems of bacteria as well as the countermeasures employed by phages, with an emphasis on the bacteriophage strategies in response to host antiviral immunity.

Determinants of Phage Host Range in Staphylococcus Species

Bacteria in the genus Staphylococcus are important targets for phage therapy due to their prevalence as pathogens and increasing antibiotic resistance. Here we review Staphylococcus outer surface features and specific phage resistance mechanisms that define the host range, the set of strains that an individual phage can potentially infect. Phage infection goes through five distinct phases: attachment, uptake, biosynthesis, assembly, and lysis. Adsorption inhibition, encompassing outer surface teichoic acid receptor alteration, elimination, or occlusion, limits successful phage attachment and entry. Restriction-modification systems (in particular, type I and IV systems), which target phage DNA inside the cell, serve as the major barriers to biosynthesis as well as transduction and horizontal gene transfer between clonal complexes and species. Resistance to late stages of infection occurs through mechanisms such as assembly interference, in which staphylococcal pathogenicity islands siphon away superinfecting phage proteins to package their own DNA. While genes responsible for teichoic acid biosynthesis, capsule, and restriction-modification are found in most Staphylococcus strains, a variety of other host range determinants (e.g., clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, abortive infection, and superinfection immunity) are sporadic. The fitness costs of phage resistance through teichoic acid structure alteration could make staphylococcal phage therapies promising, but host range prediction is complex because of the large number of genes involved, and the roles of many of these are unknown. In addition, little is known about the genetic determinants that contribute to host range expansion in the phages themselves. Future research must identify host range determinants, characterize resistance development during infection and treatment, and examine population-wide genetic background effects on resistance selection.

DNA phosphorothioate modification-a new multi-functional epigenetic system in bacteria

Synthetic phosphorothioate (PT) internucleotide linkages, in which a nonbridging oxygen is replaced by a sulphur atom, share similar physical and chemical properties with phosphodiesters but confer enhanced nuclease tolerance on DNA/RNA, making PTs a valuable biochemical and pharmacological tool. Interestingly, PT modification was recently found to occur naturally in bacteria in a sequence-selective and RP configuration-specific manner. This oxygen-sulphur swap is catalysed by the gene products of dndABCDE, which constitute a defence barrier with DndFGH in some bacterial strains that can distinguish and attack non-PT-modified foreign DNA, resembling DNA methylation-based restriction-modification (R-M) systems. Despite their similar defensive mechanisms, PT- and methylation-based R-M systems have evolved to target different consensus contexts in the host cell because when they share the same recognition sequences, the protective function of each can be impeded. The redox and nucleophilic properties of PT sulphur render PT modification a versatile player in the maintenance of cellular redox homeostasis, epigenetic regulation and environmental fitness. The widespread presence of dnd systems is considered a consequence of extensive horizontal gene transfer, whereas the lability of PT during oxidative stress and the susceptibility of PT to PT-dependent endonucleases provide possible explanations for the ubiquitous but sporadic distribution of PT modification in the bacterial world.

Natural and Artificial Strategies To Control the Conjugative Transmission of Plasmids

Conjugative plasmids are the main carriers of transmissible antibiotic resistance (AbR) genes. For that reason, strategies to control plasmid transmission have been proposed as potential solutions to prevent AbR dissemination. Natural mechanisms that bacteria employ as defense barriers against invading genomes, such as restriction-modification or CRISPR-Cas systems, could be exploited to control conjugation. Besides, conjugative plasmids themselves display mechanisms to minimize their associated burden or to compete with related or unrelated plasmids. Thus, FinOP systems, composed of FinO repressor protein and FinP antisense RNA, aid plasmids to regulate their own transfer; exclusion systems avoid conjugative transfer of related plasmids to the same recipient bacteria; and fertility inhibition systems block transmission of unrelated plasmids from the same donor cell. Artificial strategies have also been designed to control bacterial conjugation. For instance, intrabodies against R388 relaxase expressed in recipient cells inhibit plasmid R388 conjugative transfer; pIII protein of bacteriophage M13 inhibits plasmid F transmission by obstructing conjugative pili; and unsaturated fatty acids prevent transfer of clinically relevant plasmids in different hosts, promoting plasmid extinction in bacterial populations. Overall, a number of exogenous and endogenous factors have an effect on the sophisticated process of bacterial conjugation. This review puts them together in an effort to offer a wide picture and inform research to control plasmid transmission, focusing on Gram-negative bacteria.

RalR (a DNase) and RalA (a small RNA) form a type I toxin-antitoxin system in Escherichia coli

For toxin/antitoxin (TA) systems, no toxin has been identified that functions by cleaving DNA. Here, we demonstrate that RalR and RalA of the cryptic prophage rac form a type I TA pair in which the antitoxin RNA is a trans-encoded small RNA with 16 nucleotides of complementarity to the toxin mRNA. We suggest the newly discovered antitoxin gene be named ralA for RalR antitoxin. Toxin RalR functions as a non-specific endonuclease that cleaves methylated and unmethylated DNA. The RNA chaperone Hfq is required for RalA antitoxin activity and appears to stabilize RalA. Also, RalR/RalA is beneficial to the Escherichia coli host for responding to the antibiotic fosfomycin. Hence, our results indicate that cryptic prophage genes can be functionally divergent from their active phage counterparts after integration into the host genome.

Type I restriction enzymes and their relatives

Type I restriction enzymes (REases) are large pentameric proteins with separate restriction (R), methylation (M) and DNA sequence-recognition (S) subunits. They were the first REases to be discovered and purified, but unlike the enormously useful Type II REases, they have yet to find a place in the enzymatic toolbox of molecular biologists. Type I enzymes have been difficult to characterize, but this is changing as genome analysis reveals their genes, and methylome analysis reveals their recognition sequences. Several Type I REases have been studied in detail and what has been learned about them invites greater attention. In this article, we discuss aspects of the biochemistry, biology and regulation of Type I REases, and of the mechanisms that bacteriophages and plasmids have evolved to evade them. Type I REases have a remarkable ability to change sequence specificity by domain shuffling and rearrangements. We summarize the classic experiments and observations that led to this discovery, and we discuss how this ability depends on the modular organizations of the enzymes and of their S subunits. Finally, we describe examples of Type II restriction-modification systems that have features in common with Type I enzymes, with emphasis on the varied Type IIG enzymes.

Revenge of the phages: defeating bacterial defences

Bacteria and their viral predators (bacteriophages) are locked in a constant battle. In order to proliferate in phage-rich environments, bacteria have an impressive arsenal of defence mechanisms, and in response, phages have evolved counter-strategies to evade these antiviral systems. In this Review, we describe the various tactics that are used by phages to overcome bacterial resistance mechanisms, including adsorption inhibition, restriction-modification, CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated proteins) systems and abortive infection. Furthermore, we consider how these observations have enhanced our knowledge of phage biology, evolution and phage-host interactions.

Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms

Phages are now acknowledged as the most abundant microorganisms on the planet and are also possibly the most diversified. This diversity is mostly driven by their dynamic adaptation when facing selective pressure such as phage resistance mechanisms, which are widespread in bacterial hosts. When infecting bacterial cells, phages face a range of antiviral mechanisms, and they have evolved multiple tactics to avoid, circumvent or subvert these mechanisms in order to thrive in most environments. In this Review, we highlight the most important antiviral mechanisms of bacteria as well as the counter-attacks used by phages to evade these systems.

The role of interactions between phage and bacterial proteins within the infected cell: a diverse and puzzling interactome

Interactions between bacteriophage proteins and bacterial proteins are important for efficient infection of the host cell. The phage proteins involved in these bacteriophage-host interactions are often produced immediately after infection. A survey of the available set of published bacteriophage-host interactions reveals the targeted host proteins are inhibited, activated or functionally redirected by the phage protein. These interactions protect the bacteriophage from bacterial defence mechanisms or adapt the host-cell metabolism to establish an efficient infection cycle. Regrettably, a large majority of bacteriophage early proteins lack any identified function. Recent research into the antibacterial potential of bacteriophage-host interactions indicates that phage early proteins seem to target a wide variety of processes in the host cell - many of them non-essential. Since a clear understanding of such interactions may become important for regulations involving phage therapy and in biotechnological applications, increased scientific emphasis on the biological elucidation of such proteins is warranted.

The Orf18 gene product from conjugative transposon Tn916 is an ArdA antirestriction protein that inhibits type I DNA restriction-modification systems

Gene orf18, which is situated within the intercellular transposition region of the conjugative transposon Tn916 from the bacterial pathogen Enterococcus faecalis, encodes a putative ArdA (alleviation of restriction of DNA A) protein. Conjugative transposons are generally resistant to DNA restriction upon transfer to a new host. ArdA from Tn916 may be responsible for the apparent immunity of the transposon to DNA restriction and modification (R/M) systems and for ensuring that the transposon has a broad host range. The orf18 gene was engineered for overexpression in Escherichia coli, and the recombinant ArdA protein was purified to homogeneity. The protein appears to exist as a dimer at nanomolar concentrations but can form larger assemblies at micromolar concentrations. R/M assays revealed that ArdA can efficiently inhibit R/M by all four major classes of Type I R/M enzymes both in vivo and in vitro. These R/M systems are present in over 50% of sequenced prokaryotic genomes. Our results suggest that ArdA can overcome the restriction barrier following conjugation and so helps increase the spread of antibiotic resistance genes by horizontal gene transfer.

The biology of restriction and anti-restriction

The phenomena of prokaryotic restriction and modification, as well as anti-restriction, were first discovered five decades ago but have yielded only gradually to rigorous analysis. Work presented at the 5th New England Biolabs Meeting on Restriction-Modification (available on REBASE, http://www.rebase.com) and several recently published genetic, biochemical and biophysical analyses indicate that these fields continue to contribute significantly to basic science. Recently, there have been several studies that have shed light on the still developing field of restriction-modification and on the newly re-emerging field of anti-restriction.

Tracking EcoKI and DNA fifty years on: a golden story full of surprises

1953 was a historical year for biology, as it marked the birth of the DNA helix, but also a report by Bertani and Weigle on 'a barrier to infection' of bacteriophage lambda in its natural host, Escherichia coli K-12, that could be lifted by 'host-controlled variation' of the virus. This paper lay dormant till Nobel laureate Arber and PhD student Dussoix showed that the lambda DNA was rejected and degraded upon infection of different bacterial hosts, unless it carried host-specific modification of that DNA, thus laying the foundations for the phenomenon of restriction and modification (R-M). The restriction enzyme of E.coli K-12, EcoKI, was purified in 1968 and required S-adenosylmethionine (AdoMet) and ATP as cofactors. By the end of the decade there was substantial evidence for a chromosomal locus hsdK with three genes encoding restriction (R), modification (M) and specificity (S) subunits that assembled into a large complex of >400 kDa. The 1970s brought the message that EcoKI cut away from its DNA recognition target, to which site the enzyme remained bound while translocating the DNA past itself, with concomitant ATP hydrolysis and subsequent double-strand nicks. This translocation event created clearly visible DNA loops in the electron microscope. EcoKI became the archetypal Type I R-M enzyme with curious DNA translocating properties reminiscent of helicases, recognizing the bipartite asymmetric site AAC(N6)GTGC. Cloning of the hsdK locus in 1976 facilitated molecular understanding of this sophisticated R-M complex and in an elegant 'pas de deux' Murray and Dryden constructed the present model based on a large body of experimental data plus bioinformatics. This review celebrates the golden anniversary of EcoKI and ends with the exciting progress on the vital issue of restriction alleviation after DNA damage, also first reported in 1953, which involves intricate control of R subunit activity by the bacterial proteasome ClpXP, important results that will keep scientists on the EcoKI track for another 50 years to come.

Is modification sufficient to protect a bacterial chromosome from a resident restriction endonuclease?

It has been generally accepted that DNA modification protects the chromosome of a bacterium encoding a restriction and modification system. But, when target sequences within the chromosome of one such bacterium (Escherichia coli K-12) are unmodified, the cell does not destroy its own DNA; instead, ClpXP inactivates the nuclease, and restriction is said to be alleviated. Thus, the resident chromosome is recognized as 'self' rather than 'foreign' even in the absence of modification. We now provide evidence that restriction alleviation may be a characteristic of Type I restriction-modification systems, and that it can be achieved by different mechanisms. Our experiments support disassembly of active endonuclease complexes as a potential mechanism. We identify amino acid substitutions in a restriction endonuclease, which impair restriction alleviation in response to treatment with a mutagen, and demonstrate that restriction alleviation serves to protect the chromosome even in the absence of mutagenic treatment. In the absence of efficient restriction alleviation, a Type I restriction enzyme cleaves host DNA and, under these conditions, homologous recombination maintains the integrity of the bacterial chromosome.

Memory in bacteria and phage

Whenever the state of a biological system is not determined solely by present conditions but depends on its past history, we can say that the system has memory. Bacteria and bacteriophage use a variety of memory mechanisms, some of which seem to convey adaptive value. A genetic type of heritable memory is the programmed inversion of specific DNA sequences, which causes switching between alternative patterns of gene expression. Heritable memory can also be based on epigenetic circuits, in which a system with two possible steady states is locked in one or the other state by a positive feedback loop. Epigenetic states have been observed in a variety of cellular processes, and are maintained by diverse mechanisms. Some of these involve alternative DNA methylation patterns that are stably transmitted to daughter molecules and can affect DNA-protein interactions (e.g., gene transcription). Other mechanisms exploit autocatalytic loops whereby proteins establish the proper conditions for their continued synthesis. Template polymers other than nucleic acids (e.g., components of the cell wall) may also propagate epigenetic states. Non-heritable memory is exemplified by parasitic organisms that bear a signature of their previous host, such as host-controlled modification of phage DNA or porin hitchhiking in predatory bacteria. The heterogeneous nature of the examples known may be indicative of widespread occurrence of memory mechanisms in bacteria and phage. However, the actual extent, variety and potential selective value of prokaryotic memory devices remain open questions, still to be addressed experimentally.

The proteolytic control of restriction activity in Escherichia coli K-12

The endonuclease activity of EcoKI is regulated by the ClpXP-dependent degradation of the subunit that is essential for restriction, but not modification. We monitored proteolysis in mutants blocked at different steps in the restriction pathway. Mutations that prevent DNA translocation render EcoKI refractory to proteolysis, whereas those that permit DNA translocation, but block endonuclease activity, do not. Although proteolysis alleviates restriction in a mutant that lacks modification activity, some restriction activity remains; our evidence indicates residual EcoKI associated with the membrane fraction. ClpXP protects the bacterial chromosome, but little effect was detected on unmodified foreign DNA within the cytoplasm of a restriction-proficient cell. The molecular basis for the distinction between unmodified resident and foreign DNA remains to be determined.

Type I restriction systems: sophisticated molecular machines (a legacy of Bertani and Weigle)

Restriction enzymes are well known as reagents widely used by molecular biologists for genetic manipulation and analysis, but these reagents represent only one class (type II) of a wider range of enzymes that recognize specific nucleotide sequences in DNA molecules and detect the provenance of the DNA on the basis of specific modifications to their target sequence. Type I restriction and modification (R-M) systems are complex; a single multifunctional enzyme can respond to the modification state of its target sequence with the alternative activities of modification or restriction. In the absence of DNA modification, a type I R-M enzyme behaves like a molecular motor, translocating vast stretches of DNA towards itself before eventually breaking the DNA molecule. These sophisticated enzymes are the focus of this review, which will emphasize those aspects that give insights into more general problems of molecular and microbial biology. Current molecular experiments explore target recognition, intramolecular communication, and enzyme activities, including DNA translocation. Type I R-M systems are notable for their ability to evolve new specificities, even in laboratory cultures. This observation raises the important question of how bacteria protect their chromosomes from destruction by newly acquired restriction specifities. Recent experiments demonstrate proteolytic mechanisms by which cells avoid DNA breakage by a type I R-M system whenever their chromosomal DNA acquires unmodified target sequences. Finally, the review will reflect the present impact of genomic sequences on a field that has previously derived information almost exclusively from the analysis of bacteria commonly studied in the laboratory.

Modulation of EcoKI restriction in vivo: role of the lambda Gam protein and plasmid metabolism

Two novel types of alleviation of DNA restriction by the EcoKI restriction endonuclease are described. The first type depends on the presence of the gam gene product (Gam protein) of bacteriophage lambda. The efficiency of plating of unmodified phage lambda is greatly increased when the restricting Escherichia coli K-12 host carries a gam+ plasmid. The effect is particularly striking in wild-type strains and, to a lesser extent, in the presence of sbcC and recA mutations. In all cases, Gam-dependent alleviation of restriction requires active recBCD genes of the host and recombination (red) genes of the infecting phage. The enhanced capacity of Gam-expressing cells to repair DNA strand breaks might account for this phenomenon. The second type is caused by the presence of a plasmid in a restricting host lacking RecBCD enzyme. Commonly used plasmids such as the cloning vector pACYC184 can produce such an effect in strains carrying recB single mutations or in recBC sbcBC strains. Plasmid-mediated restriction alleviation in recBC sbcBC strains is independent of the host RecF, RecJ, and RecA proteins and phage recombination functions. The presence of plasmids can also relieve restriction in recD strains. This effect depends, however, on the RecA function in the host. The molecular mechanism of the plasmid-mediated restriction alleviation remains unclear.

Modification enhancement and restriction alleviation by bacteriophage lambda

The activity of EcoKI, and related restriction and modification (R-M) systems, is modulated by the bacteriophage lambda ral gene product. We have identified the coding sequence for an analogous function in the Rac prophage of E. coli K-12.

Restriction alleviation and modification enhancement by the Rac prophage of Escherichia coli K-12

Bacteriophage lambda encodes an antirestriction function, RaI, which is able to modulate the activity of the Escherichia coli K-12 restriction and modification system, EcoKI. Here we report the characterization of an analogous function, Lar, expressed by E. coli sbcA mutants and the hybrid phage lambda reverse. E. coli sbcA mutants and lambda reverse both express genes of the Rac prophage, and we have located the lar gene immediately downstream of recT in this element. The lar gene has been cloned in an expression plasmid, and a combination of site-directed mutagenesis and labelling of plasmid-encoded proteins has enabled us to identify a number of translational products of lar, the smallest of which is sufficient for restriction alleviation. Lar, like RaI, is able both to alleviate restriction and to enhance modification by EcoKI. Lar, therefore, is functionally similar to RaI and the nucleotide sequences of their genes share 47% identity, indicating a common origin. A comparison of the predicted amino acid sequences of Lar and RaI shows only a 25% identity, but a few short regions do align and may indicate residues important for structure and/or function.

Response to UV damage by four Escherichia coli K-12 restriction systems

To understand the role of restriction in regulating gene flow in bacterial populations, we would like to understand the regulation of restriction enzyme activity. Several antirestriction (restriction alleviation) systems are known that reduce the activity of type I restriction enzymes like EcoKI in vivo. Most of these do not act on type II or type III enzymes, but little information is available for the unclassified modification-dependent systems, of which there are three in E. coli K-12. Of particular interest are two physiological controls on type I enzymes: EcoKI restriction is reduced 2 to 3 orders of magnitude following DNA damage, and a similar effect is seen constitutively in Dam- cells. We used the behavior of EcoKI as a control for testing the response to UV treatment of the three endogenous modification-dependent restriction systems of K-12, McrA, McrBC, and Mrr. Two of these were also tested for response to Dam status. We find that all four resident restriction systems show reduced activity following UV treatment, but not in a unified fashion; each response was genetically and physiologically distinct. Possible mechanisms are discussed.

Plasmid pKM101 encodes two nonhomologous antirestriction proteins (ArdA and ArdB) whose expression is controlled by homologous regulatory sequences

The IncN plasmid pKM101 (a derivative of R46) encodes the antirestriction protein ArdB (alleviation of restriction of DNA) in addition to another antirestriction protein, ArdA, described previously. The relevant gene, ardB, was located in the leading region of pKM101, about 7 kb from oriT. The nucleotide sequence of ardB was determined, and an appropriate polypeptide was identified in maxicells of Escherichia coli. Like ArdA, ArdB efficiently inhibits restriction by members of the three known families of type I systems of E. coli and only slightly affects the type II enzyme, EcoRI. However, in contrast to ArdA, ArdB is ineffective against the modification activity of the type I (EcoK) system. Comparison of deduced amino acid sequences of ArdA and ArdB revealed only one small region of similarity (nine residues), suggesting that this region may be somehow involved in the interaction with the type I restriction systems. We also found that the expression of both ardA and ardB genes is controlled jointly by two pKM101-encoded proteins, ArdK and ArdR, with molecular weights of about 15,000 and 20,000, respectively. The finding that the sequences immediately upstream of ardA and ardB share about 94% identity over 218 bp suggests that their expression may be controlled by ArdK and ArdR at the transcriptional level. Deletion studies and promoter probe analysis of these sequences revealed the regions responsible for the action of ArdK and ArdR as regulatory proteins. We propose that both types of antirestriction proteins may play a pivotal role in overcoming the host restriction barrier by self-transmissible broad-host-range plasmids. It seems likely that the ardKR-dependent regulatory system serves in this case as a genetic switch that controls the expression of plasmid-encoded antirestriction functions during mating.

IncN plasmid pKM101 and IncI1 plasmid ColIb-P9 encode homologous antirestriction proteins in their leading regions

The IncN plasmid pKM101 (a derivative of R46), like the IncI1 plasmid ColIb-P9, carries a gene (ardA, for alleviation of restriction of DNA) encoding an antirestriction function. ardA was located about 4 kb from the origin of transfer, in the region transferred early during bacterial conjugation. The nucleotide sequence of ardA was determined, and an appropriate polypeptide with the predicted molecular weight of about 19,500 was identified in maxicells of Escherichia coli. Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of the antirestriction proteins of the unrelated plasmids pKM101 and ColIb (ArdA and Ard, respectively) revealed that these proteins have about 60% identity. Like ColIb Ard, pKM101 ArdA specifically inhibits both the restriction and modification activities of five type I systems of E. coli tested and does not influence type III (EcoP1) restriction or the 5-methylcytosine-specific restriction systems McrA and McrB. However, in contrast to ColIb Ard, pKM101 ArdA is effective against the type II enzyme EcoRI. The Ard proteins are believed to overcome the host restriction barrier during bacterial conjugation. We have also identified two other genes of pKM101, ardR and ardK, which seem to control ardA activity and ardA-mediated lethality, respectively. Our findings suggest that ardR may serve as a genetic switch that determines whether the ardA-encoded antirestriction function is induced during mating.

Alleviation of EcoK DNA restriction in Escherichia coli and involvement of umuDC activity

The activity of the EcoK DNA restriction system of Escherichia coli reduces both the plating efficiency of unmodified phage lambda and the transforming ability of unmodified pBR322 plasmid DNA. However, restriction can be alleviated in wild-type cells, by UV irradiation and expression of the SOS response, so that 10(3)- to 10(4)-fold increases in phage growth and fourfold increases in plasmid transformation occurred with unmodified DNA. Restriction alleviation was found to be a transient effect because induced cells, which initially failed to restrict unmodified plasmid DNA, later restricted unmodified phage lambda. Although the SOS response was needed for restriction alleviation, constitutive SOS induction, elicited genetically with a recA730 mutation, did not alleviate restriction and UV irradiation was still needed. A hitherto unsuspected involvement of the umuDC operon in this alleviation of restriction is characterized and, by differential complementation, was separated from the better known role of umuDC in mutagenic DNA repair. The need for cleavage of UmuD for restriction alleviation was shown with plasmids encoding cleavable, cleaved, and non-cleavable forms of UmuD. However, UV irradiation was still needed even when cleaved UmuD was provided. The possibility that restriction alleviation occurs by a general inhibition of the EcoK restriction/modification complex was tested and discounted because modification of lambda was not reduced by UV irradiation. An alternative idea, that restriction activity was competitively reduced by an increase in EcoK modification, was also discounted by the lack of any increase in the modification of lambda Ral-, a naturally undermodified phage. Other possible mechanisms for restriction alleviation are discussed.

Mutations that confer de novo activity upon a maintenance methyltransferase

DNA methyltransferases are not only sequence specific in their action, but they also differentiate between the alternative methylation states of a target site. Some methyltransferases are equally active on either unmethylated or hemimethylated DNA and consequently function as de novo methyltransferases. Others are specific for hemimethylated target sequences, consistent with the postulated role of a maintenance methyltransferase in perpetuating a pattern of DNA modification. The molecular basis for the difference between de novo and maintenance methyltransferase activity is unknown, yet fundamental to cellular activities that are affected by different methylation states of the genome. The methyltransferase activity of the type I restriction and modification system, EcoK, is the only known prokaryotic methyltransferase shown to be specific for hemimethylated target sequences. We have isolated mutants of Escherichia coli K-12 which are able to modify unmethylated target sequences efficiently in a manner indicative of de novo methyltransferase activity. Consistent with this change in specificity, some mutations shift the balance between DNA restriction and modification as if both activities now compete at unmethylated targets. Two genes encode the methyltransferase and all the mutations are loosely clustered within one of them.

Nucleotide sequence of the gene (ard) encoding the antirestriction protein of plasmid colIb-P9

The IncI1 plasmid ColIb-P9 was found to encode an antirestriction function. The relevant gene, ard (alleviation of restriction of DNA), maps about 5 kb from the origin of transfer, in the region transferred early during bacterial conjugation. Ard inhibits both restriction and modification by each of the four type I systems of Escherichia coli tested, but it had no effect on restriction by either EcoRI, a type II system, or EcoP1, a type III system. The nucleotide sequence of the ColIb ard gene was determined; the predicted molecular weight of the Ard polypeptide is 19,193. The proposed polypeptide chain contains an excess of 25 negatively charged amino acids, suggesting that its overall character is very acidic. Deletion analysis of the gene revealed that the Ard protein contained a distinct functional domain located in the COOH-terminal half of the polypeptide. We suggest that the biological role of the ColIb Ard protein is associated with overcoming host-controlled restriction during bacterial conjugation.

Alleviation of type I restriction in adenine methylase (dam) mutants of Escherichia coli

The host-controlled EcoK-restriction of unmodified phage lambda.O is alleviated in dam mutants of Escherichia coli by 100- to 300-fold. In addition, the EcoK modification activity is substantially decreased in dam- strains. We show that type I restriction (EcoB, EcoD and EcoK) is detectably alleviated in dam mutants. However, no relief of EcoRI restriction (Type II) occurs in dam- strains and only a slight effect of dam mutation on EcoP1 restriction (Type III) is observed. We interpret the alleviation of the type I restriction in dam- strains to be a consequence of induction of the function which interferes with type I restriction systems.

Organization and sequence of the hsd genes of Escherichia coli K-12

The nucleotide sequence of the hsdR and M genes, together with that for hsdS comprises an 8400 base segment spanning the entire hsd region of Escherichia coli K-12. The three hsd genes are transcribed in the same direction, but from two promoters. hsdR and hsdM are separated by 492 base-pairs, whereas the termination codon of hsdM overlaps the initiation codon of hsdS. pres precedes hsdR, and our data indicate a transcription termination signal in the interval between hsdR and pmod, as expected if transcription of hsdM and S is dependent on pmod. Transcription from pres is not influenced by the products of the hsdM and S genes, and the mechanism whereby restriction is prevented when the hsd region is transferred to a modification-deficient cell remains to be elucidated. A segment of the predicted amino acid sequence of the M polypeptide shares homology with a variety of adenine methylases and may identify part of the active site for methylation of specific adenine residues. The R polypeptide shows homology with a variety of ATPases, and pronounced regions of alpha-helical structure are predicted, one of which is amphipathic.

EcoR124 and EcoR124/3: the first members of a new family of type I restriction and modification systems

We have purified the EcoR124 and EcoR124/3 restriction enzymes and shown that they are type I enzymes by several criteria: subunit composition, DNA and S-adenosylmethionine-dependent ATPase activity, and site-specific DNA methylase activity. By immunochemical criteria these enzymes are related to each other but are unrelated to the two previously investigated families of type I restriction enzymes. They form therefore a new family which we call type IC. The arrangement of the structural genes coding for these enzymes and their transcriptional organisation have been determined. These are different from the common arrangement found for the other two families of type I enzymes.

Indications of an involvement of heat-shock proteins in restoration of repression of temperative-inducible lambda prophage

Characteristics of lambda c/ts857 prophages that can be attributed to the ability of the temperature-sensitive phage repressor to renature at low temperature are not apparent in host cells that contain a mutation in the htpR gene. Host killing by prophages that are N- or are blocked in DNA synthesis is not prevented by the return of mutant cells to low temperature, and recovery of cells in which the phage remains derepressed is not delayed if the prophage is a mutant that cannot kill. These and other findings suggest that the phage repressor protein is unusually susceptible to inactivation in cells that are unable to respond to heat shock.

Two DNA antirestriction systems of bacteriophage P1, darA, and darB: characterization of darA- phages

Bacteriophage P1 is only weakly restricted when it infects cells carrying type I restriction and modification systems even though DNA purified from P1 phage particles is a good substrate for type I restriction enzymes in vitro. Here we show that this protection against restriction is due to the products of two phage genes which we call darA and darB (dar for defense against restriction). Each of the dar gene products provides protection against a different subset of type I restriction systems. The darA and darB gene products are found in the phage head and protect any DNA packaged into a phage head, including transduced chromosomal markers, from restriction. The proteins must, therefore, be injected into recipient cells along with the DNA. The proteins act strictly in cis. For example, upon double infection of restricting cells with dar+ and dar- P1 phages, the dar+ genomes are protected from restriction while the dar- genomes are efficiently restricted.

Modification enhancement by the restriction alleviation protein (Ral) of bacteriophage lambda

The product of the lambda ral gene alleviates restriction and enhances modification by the Escherichia coli K-12 restriction and modification system. An open reading frame (orf) located between genes N and Ea10 has been assigned to the ral gene. We have cloned this orf in a plasmid where its transcription is controlled by a thermolabile lambda repressor. Inactivation of the lambda repressor caused a 1000-fold reduction in K-specific restriction of unmodified lambda phage and a 100-fold increase in modification. In minicells transformed with ral+ plasmids, derepression resulted in the appearance of a polypeptide with a lower mobility than that predicted for a protein encoded by the orf attributed to ral; in a transcription and translation system in vitro DNA from a ral+ plasmid encoded a polypeptide with the same mobility. This polypeptide was absent when the plasmid DNA carried a mutant ral gene. The nucleotide sequence of this mutant gene defined two base changes, one of which inactivates the initiation codon of the orf. The K restriction endonuclease, which is also a K-specific methylase, is encoded by three genes designated hsdR, hsdM and hsdS, although the hsdR polypeptide is not essential for the methylase activity. We show that Ral enhances modification in a host strain lacking the entire hsdR gene, and lambda phages carrying the hsdM and S genes modify their own DNA inefficiently in the absence of Ral, despite the fact that derivatives of these phages provide efficient amplification of the K-specific methylase. Our data support a model in which, as a consequence of the interaction of Ral with either the hsdM or the hsdS polypeptide, the conformation of the enzyme is changed and the efficiency of methylation of unmodified target sites is enhanced. It has been postulated that Ral counteracts Rho, but in our experiments Ral did not relieve transcriptional polarity.

Transcription termination and processing sites in the bacteriophage lambda pL operon

S1 nuclease mapping was performed on transcripts from the major leftward operon of the bacteriophage lambda in order to locate the 3' ends of stable RNA species produced in vivo. The analysis was carried out on RNA purified from either an induced lambda prophage or bacteria carrying a plasmid containing a large segment of lambda including the intact PL operon through the bet gene. The S1 nuclease mapping was performed on transcripts produced in the presence and the absence of the N antitermination function, and in the presence and the absence of either the RNase III processing enzyme or the Rho factor. The results of this work indicate that the intercistronic region between the N and ral genes of lambda contains three sites at which transcripts end under N-Rho+ conditions (positions on the lambda sequence: 34,826, 34,558 and 34,393). The distal two correspond to the two sites previously described in this region as tL1 (on both sides of the BamHI site). In the region between ral and Ea10, we mapped the 3' ends of three species of RNA. The 3' end of one species was found to be located 90 nucleotides proximal to tL2a, at 34,000 in the lambda sequence. The terminator at this site may be partially N-resistant. In an RNase III deficient host, an additional RNA species is formed. The 3' end of this RNA species is located at tL2a (33,910 on the lambda sequence). In the presence of the antitermination N gene product, the readthrough transcripts are processed to form a 3' end at position 33,980 on the lambda sequence. These results suggest that elongation of transcription of the lambda PL operon is reduced gradually by clusters of termination located between genes and that the expression of the terminated products is further controlled by processing of the mRNA.

EcoA and EcoE: alternatives to the EcoK family of type I restriction and modification systems of Escherichia coli

The genes (hsd A) encoding EcoA, a restriction and modification system first identified in Escherichia coli 15T-, behave in genetic crosses as alleles of the genes (hsd K) encoding the archetypal type I restriction and modification system of E. coli K12. Nevertheless, molecular experiments have failed to detect relatedness between the A and K systems. We have cloned the hsd A genes and have identified, on the basis of DNA homology, related genes (hsd E) conferring a new specificity to a natural isolate of E. coli. We show that the overall organization of the genes encoding EcoA and EcoE closely parallels that for EcoK. Each enzyme is encoded by three genes, of which only one, hsdS, confers the specificity of DNA interaction. The three genes are in the same order as those encoding EcoK, i.e. hsdR, hsdM and hsdS and, similarly, they include a promoter between hsdR and hsdM from which the M and S genes can be transcribed. The evidence indicates that EcoA and EcoE are type I restriction and modification enzymes, but they appear to identify an alternative family to EcoK. For both families, the hsdR polypeptide is by far the largest, but the sizes of the other two polypeptides are reversed, with the smallest polypeptide of EcoK being the product of hsd S, and the smallest for the EcoA family being the product of hsdM. Physiologically, the A restriction and modification system differs from that of K and its relatives, in that A-specific methylation of unmodified DNA is particularly effective.

Plating efficiencies of modified lambda bio particles on temperature-sensitive hsd mutants of Escherichia coli K12

Two mutants of Escherichia coli K12 that are temperature sensitive in cell growth and lambda phage production are shown to contain at least two mutations. One of the mutations in each of the isolates is in the hsd locus, and modification and restriction of lambda exhibits temperature sensitivity. One of the hsd mutations causes plaque formation by modified lambda bio particles that do not contain an intact ral gene to be temperature dependent.

The novel gene(s) ARD of plasmid pKM101: alleviation of EcoK restriction

The host-controlled K restriction of unmodified phage lambda was 10-100-fold alleviated in the wild-type strain E. coli K12, carrying plasmid pKM101 of incompability group N. pKM101-mediated release of K restriction was also observed in lexA-, recA-, and recB- strains of E. coli K12. By restriction mapping Tn5 insertions in pKM101, which reduced pKM101-mediated alleviation of restriction, were shown to be located within the BglIIB fragment approximately 11 kb anticlockwise from the RI site of pKM101. We have termed the gene(s) promoting the alleviation of K restriction of phage lambda ard (alleviation of restriction of DNA). It was shown (1) that ard function affected only the EcoK restriction system and not the EcoB, EcoRI, EcoRIII, or EcoPI systems, (2) ard gene(s) did not mediate EcoK type modification of lambda DNA and did not increase the modification activity of the EcoK system in a way similar to that observed with gene ral of bacteriophage lambda.

Conservation of genome form but not sequence in the transcription antitermination determinants of bacteriophages lambda, phi 21 and P22

Comparisons are made among DNA sequences upstream from terminators in both leftwards and rightwards early operons of related coliphages lambda, phi 21 and P22. These sequences include both left and right determinants of response to phage-coded antitermination proteins, "N", as well as the N structural genes themselves. Despite almost total disparity of DNA sequence, the three genomes can be discerned to include the same elements in the same order and spacing: downstream from the early left promoter are sequentially a site of recognition for host nusA protein, a dyad symmetry "nut" essential for N function in lambda, overlapping sites for processing of the transcript by RNAase III and then the N structural genes; downstream from the cro gene on the right are sites of nusA recognition and nut dyad symmetries homologous to those on the left. Because the N proteins of lambda, phi 21 and P22 do not for the most part complement each other, a specific site of N recognition has been postulated for each N-responding operon. The nut dyad symmetry qualifies as such a site, since the loop of the left dyad in lambda is marked by mutations that block N function leftwards, and since DNA sequences here show close homology between the loops of left and right dyads for each phage, but less if not little homology for different phages.

Restriction nuclease and enzymatic analysis of transposon-induced mutations of the Rac prophage which affect expression and function of recE in Escherichia coli K-12

Fourteen Tn5-generated mutations of the Rac prophage, called sbc because they suppress recB21 recC22, were found to fall into two distinct types: type I mutations, which were insertions of Tn5, and type II mutations, which were insertions of IS50. Both orientations of Tn5 and IS50 were represented among the mutants and were arbitrarily labeled A and B. All 14 of the Tn5 and IS50 insertions occurred in the same location (+/- 100 base pairs) approximately 5.6 kilobases from one of the hybrid attachment sites. Eleven of the mutants contained essentially the same amount of exonuclease VIII, the product of recE. The possibility that a promoter for recE was created by the insertion of Tn5 and IS50 was considered. Two IS50 mutants in which such a promoter could not have been created showed three to four times as much exonuclease VIII, and another showed one-half as much as the majority. The possibility was considered that a promoter internal to IS50 is responsible for this heterogeneity. Restriction alleviation was measured in all 14 mutants. An insertion of the transposon Tn10 which reduces expression of exonuclease VIII (recE101::Tn10) was located within the Rac prophage at a position 2.35 kilobases from the left hybrid attachment site. Location and orientation of the Rac prophage on the Escherichia coli genetic map are discussed in light of these results.

Novel mechanism of cell division inhibition associated with the SOS response in Escherichia coli

Certain Escherichia coli strains were shown to possess a novel system of cell division inhibition, called the SfiC+ phenotype. SfiC+ filamentation had a number of properties similar to those of sfiA-dependent division inhibition previously described: (i) both are associated with the SOS response induced by expression of the recA(Tif) mutation, (ii) both are associated with cell death, (iii) both are amplified in mutants lacking the Lon protease, and (iv) both are suppressed by sfiB mutations. SfiC+ filamentation and sfiA-dependent division inhibition differed in (i) the physiological conditions under which loss of viability is observed, (ii) the extent of amplification in lon mutants, (iii) their genetic regulation (SfiC+ filamentation is not under direct negative control of the LexA repressor), and (iv) their genetic determinants (SfiC+ filamentation depends on a locus, sfiC+, near 28 min on the E. coli map and distinct from sfiA).

Zygotic induction of the rac locus can cause cell death in E. coli

Conjugational transfer of the rac locus of E. coli K-12 into a Rac- recipient strain (i.e. rac+ X rac-) results in the killing of a majority of the recipient cells. The efficiency of killing depends somewhat on the plating medium, and can be as high as 98%. The killing is not observed in the rac+ X rac+, rac- X rac- or rac- X rac+ configurations. The rac locus, which has the properties of a cryptic prophage, may carry a function analogous to the kil function of bacteriophage lambda, or may instead cause killing by some replication related process.

UV-induced allevation of lambda restriction in Escherichia coli K-12: kinetics of induction and specificity of this SOS function

In UV-irradiated cells of Escherichia coli K-12 a partial release of the restriction of non-modified phage lambda is observed when the cells are recA+ lexA+. We show here that the induction of this restriction allevation (RA) also depends on the recBC enzyme and that the expression of RA requires protein synthesis. Maximum expression was reached within 60 to 90 min after irradiation. Experiments are presented which show that upon UV-irradiation a signal is created which triggers the development of RA when protein synthesis is allowed. This signal decayed with a half-life of only a few minutes in cells treated with chloramphenicol. The decay kinetics were similar in uvr+ and uvrA mutants. RA appeared to be specific for EcoK insofar as no allevation of lambda restriction by EcoRI, EcoRII and EcoP1 occurred. During maximum expression of RA no gross reduction of the activities of the recBC enzyme (exonuclease V) and the restriction endonuclease EcoK was observed and no new DNA modifying activity appeared in the cells. Since, in fully expressed cells, up to 75% of the infecting lambda DNA was converted to acid-soluble material within 20 min after infection we suggest that only a small specific fraction of lambda infections may undergo RA.

Effect of bacteriophage lambda infection on synthesis of groE protein and other Escherichia coli proteins

We used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis to quantitate the changes in rates of synthesis that follow phage lambda infection for 21 Escherichia coli proteins, including groE and dnaK proteins. Although total protein synthesis and the rates of synthesis of most individual E. coli proteins decreased after infection, some proteins, including groE protein, dnaK protein, and stringent starvation protein, showed increases to rates substantially above their preinfection rates. Infection by lambda Q- affected host synthesis in the same way as infection by gamma+, whereas infection by lambda N- showed no detectable effect on host synthesis. Deletion of the early genes between att and N abolished the effect, and shorter deletions in this region gave intermediate effects. By this sort of deletion mapping, we show that a large part, though not all, of the effect of lambda infection on host protein synthesis can be ascribed to the early region that contains phage genes Ea10 and ral. We compared the changes in protein synthesis after infection with the changes that occur in uninfected cells upon heat shock or amino acid starvation. The spectrum of changes that occurred on infection was very different from that seen after heat shock but quite similar to that seen during amino acid starvation. Despite this similarity of the effects of lambda infection and starvation, we did not detect any increase in the level of guanosine tetraphosphate during infection. We show that the groE protein is the same protein as B56.5 of Lemaux et al. (Cell 13:427-434, 1978) and A protein of Subramanian et al. (Eur. J. Biochem. 67:591-601, 1976).

The DNA sequence of the phage lambda genome between PL and the gene bet

We have determined 3,400 base pairs of DNA sequence from the phage gamma genome which starts to the right of PL and runs to the left into the gene bet. The sequence thus includes the genes, N, ral, Ea10, cIII, kil and gam, as well as the transcription terminators TL1 and TL2. One surprising feature of the sequence is the presence in the region expected to be occupied by ral of a long open reading frame that, if it is expressed, would have to be transcribed from left to right, or counter to transcription from PL.

Restriction alleviation by bacteriophages lambda and lambda reverse

Deletion analysis indicated that the phage lambda restriction alleviation gene(s) ral resides between the cIII and N genes. The Ral+ phenotype was expressed only when lambda ral+ carried a modification such that it was resistant to restriction by the host specificity system. Under these conditions, Ral function protected superinfecting unmodified phages from restriction by EcoK or EcoB but not from restriction by EcoP1. Ral-protected phage DNA was not concomitantly K and B modified, but rather received only the modification specified by the system of the restricting host. Possible mechanisms for Ral action are discussed. Of the other lambdoid phages tested, the hybrid phage lambda rev had Ral activity, whereas phi 80vir and one lambda-P22 hybrid did not. The restriction alleviation activity of lambda rev called Lar, may be the same as the activity expressed in sbcA- strains of Escherichia coli, but it was functionally separable from exonuclease VIII activity (the product of the recE gene), which is also expressed in sbcA- strains.

The ral gene of phage lambda. II. Isolation and characterization of ral deficient mutants

The lambda ral function modulates the restriction and modification activities of the Escherichia coli K12 and B restriction enzymes (Zabeau et al., 1980). In order to further analyse this function, ral deficient mutants have been isolated, using a method which exploits the property of the strong mutagen N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (N.G.) to induce multiple closely linked mutations. Hence, mutagenized phages carrying mutations in one locus were frequently found to contain additional mutations in adjacent loci. This very efficient mutagenesis procedure enabled us to isolate 27 independent Ral deficient mutants. Seven mutants were found to affect the ral gene directly and were located between the genes N anc cIII. Detailed mapping of two of these mutants showed that the lambda ral gene is located at position 70.6-70.9% on the physical map. The isolation and characterization of these mutants further supports the conclusion that ral is a gene different from the N gene, and demonstrates that the ral gene product is responsible for both counteracting restriction and enhancing modification.

The ral gene of phage lambda. III. Interference with E. coli ATP dependent functions

The ral gene of phage lambda has previously been shown to counteract host controlled restriction and to enhance DNA modification in Escherichia coli (Zabeau et al., 1980). The studies presented in this paper demonstrate that although ral plays only a minor role in the lytic development of phage lambda, it counteracts different E. coli functions, which, like the E. coli restriction system, are ATP dependent. First, ral was found to specifically decrease the efficiency of recombination mediated by the RecBC pathway. Secondly, we observed that E. coli strains in which ral is constitutively expressed, exhibit phenotypes analogous to those of strains carrying mutations in the transcription termination factor rho. In addition, in rho deficient strains general recombination and host controlled restriction are both reduced. These findings strongly suggest that ral might be a second anti-termination function, which in contrast to the lambda N gene product directly antagonizes rho.