Neuronal activity in the flocculus of the alert monkey during sinusoidal optokinetic stimulation

Purkinje cell responses during visually and vestibularly driven smooth eye movements in mice

INTRODUCTION

An essential complement to molecular-genetic approaches for analyzing the function of the oculomotor circuitry in mice is an understanding of sensory and motor signal processing in the circuit. Although there has been extensive analysis of the signals carried by neurons in the oculomotor circuits of species, such as monkeys, rabbits and goldfish, relatively little in vivo physiology has been done in the oculomotor circuitry of mice. We analyzed the contribution of vestibular and nonvestibular signals to the responses of individual Purkinje cells in the cerebellar flocculus of mice.

METHODS

We recorded Purkinje cells in the cerebellar flocculus of C57BL/6 mice during eye movement responses to vestibular and visual stimulation.

RESULTS

As in other species, most individual Purkinje cells in mice carried both vestibular and nonvestibular signals, and the most common response across cells was an increase in firing in response to ipsiversive eye movement or ipsiversive head movement. When both the head and eyes were moving, the Purkinje cell responses were approximated as a linear summation of head and eye velocity inputs. Unlike other species, floccular Purkinje cells in mice were considerably more sensitive to eye velocity than head velocity.

CONCLUSIONS

The signal content of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar flocculus of mice was qualitatively similar to that in other species. However, the eye velocity sensitivity was higher than in other species, which may reflect a tuning to the smaller range of eye velocities in mice.

Visual-vestibular cue integration for heading perception: applications of optimal cue integration theory

The perception of self-motion is crucial for navigation, spatial orientation and motor control. In particular, estimation of one's direction of translation, or heading, relies heavily on multisensory integration in most natural situations. Visual and nonvisual (e.g., vestibular) information can be used to judge heading, but each modality alone is often insufficient for accurate performance. It is not surprising, then, that visual and vestibular signals converge frequently in the nervous system, and that these signals interact in powerful ways at the level of behavior and perception. Early behavioral studies of visual-vestibular interactions consisted mainly of descriptive accounts of perceptual illusions and qualitative estimation tasks, often with conflicting results. In contrast, cue integration research in other modalities has benefited from the application of rigorous psychophysical techniques, guided by normative models that rest on the foundation of ideal-observer analysis and Bayesian decision theory. Here we review recent experiments that have attempted to harness these so-called optimal cue integration models for the study of self-motion perception. Some of these studies used nonhuman primate subjects, enabling direct comparisons between behavioral performance and simultaneously recorded neuronal activity. The results indicate that humans and monkeys can integrate visual and vestibular heading cues in a manner consistent with optimal integration theory, and that single neurons in the dorsal medial superior temporal area show striking correlates of the behavioral effects. This line of research and other applications of normative cue combination models should continue to shed light on mechanisms of self-motion perception and the neuronal basis of multisensory integration.

Recurrent cerebellar architecture solves the motor-error problem

Current views of cerebellar function have been heavily influenced by the models of Marr and Albus, who suggested that the climbing fibre input to the cerebellum acts as a teaching signal for motor learning. It is commonly assumed that this teaching signal must be motor error (the difference between actual and correct motor command), but this approach requires complex neural structures to estimate unobservable motor error from its observed sensory consequences. We have proposed elsewhere a recurrent decorrelation control architecture in which Marr-Albus models learn without requiring motor error. Here, we prove convergence for this architecture and demonstrate important advantages for the modular control of systems with multiple degrees of freedom. These results are illustrated by modelling adaptive plant compensation for the three-dimensional vestibular ocular reflex. This provides a functional role for recurrent cerebellar connectivity, which may be a generic anatomical feature of projections between regions of cerebral and cerebellar cortex.

Influence of eye motion on adaptive modifications of the vestibulo-ocular reflex in the rat

While sustained retinal slip is assumed to be the basic conditioning stimulus in adaptive modifications of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) gain, several observations suggest that eye motion-related signals might also be involved. We oscillated pigmented rats over periods of 20 min around the vertical axis, at 0.3 Hz and 20 degrees/s peak velocity, in different retinal slip and/or eye motion conditions in order to modify their VOR gain. The positions of both eyes were recorded by means of a phase-detection coil system with the head restrained. The main findings came from the comparison of two basic conditions--including their respective controls--in which one or both eyes were reversibly immobilised by threads sutured to the eyes. In the first condition the animals were rotated in the light with one eye immobilised and the other eye free to move but covered. Rotation in the light in this open-loop condition immediately elicited high-gain compensatory eye movements of the non-impeded, covered eye. At the end of this training procedure, the VOR gain increased by 43.2%. In the second condition, both eyes were immobilised and one eye was covered. The result was an increase in the VOR gain of 26.3%. These two conditions were similar as to the visuo-vestibular drive during the exposure, but different as to the resulting--and allowed--eye motion, showing that the condition where the larger eye movements occurred yielded the larger VOR gain change. Our data support the idea proposed by Collewijn and Grootendorst (1979, p. 779) and Collewijn (1981, p. 146) that "[retinal] slip and eye movements seem to be relevant signals for the adaptation of the rabbit's visuo-vestibular oculomotor reflexes".(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)