DNA synthesis in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli K-12 strains carrying dnaA mutations

Replication forks stalled at ultraviolet lesions are rescued via RecA and RuvABC protein-catalyzed disintegration in Escherichia coli

Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation is not known to induce chromosomal fragmentation in sublethal doses, and yet UV irradiation causes genetic instability and cancer, suggesting that chromosomes are fragmented. Here we show that UV irradiation induces fragmentation in sublethal doses, but the broken chromosomes are repaired or degraded by RecBCD; therefore, to observe full fragmentation, RecBCD enzyme needs to be inactivated. Using quantitative pulsed field gel electrophoresis and sensitive DNA synthesis measurements, we investigated the mechanisms of UV radiation-induced chromosomal fragmentation in recBC mutants, comparing five existing models of DNA damage-induced fragmentation. We found that fragmentation depends on active DNA synthesis before, but not after, UV irradiation. At low UV irradiation doses, fragmentation does not need excision repair or daughter strand gap repair. Fragmentation absolutely depends on both RecA-catalyzed homologous strand exchange and RuvABC-catalyzed Holliday junction resolution. Thus, chromosomes fragment when replication forks stall at UV lesions and regress, generating Holliday junctions. Remarkably, cells specifically utilize fork breakage to rescue stalled replication and avoid lethality.

Maintaining replication fork integrity in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells

In dividing cells, the stalling of replication fork complexes by impediments to DNA unwinding or by template imperfections that block synthesis by the polymerase subunits is a serious threat to genomic integrity and cell viability. What happens to stalled forks depends on the nature of the offending obstacle. In UV-irradiated Escherichia coli cells DNA synthesis is delayed for a considerable period, during which forks undergo extensive processing before replication can resume. Thus, restart depends on factors needed to load the replicative helicase, indicating that the replisome may have dissociated. It also requires the RecFOR proteins, which are known to load RecA recombinase on single-stranded DNA, implying that template strands are exposed. To gain a further understanding of how UV irradiation affects replication and how replication resumes after a block, we used fluorescence microscopy and BrdU or radioisotope labelling to examine chromosome replication and cell cycle progression. Our studies confirm that RecFOR promote efficient reactivation of stalled forks and demonstrate that they are also needed for productive replication initiated at the origin, or triggered elsewhere by damage to the DNA. Although delayed, all modes of replication do recover in the absence of these proteins, but nascent DNA strands are degraded more extensively by RecJ exonuclease. However, these strands are also degraded in the presence of RecFOR when restart is blocked by other means, indicating that RecA loading is not sufficient to stabilise and protect the fork. This is consistent with the idea that RecA actively promotes restart. Thus, in contrast to eukaryotic cells, there may be no factor in bacterial cells acting specifically to stabilise stalled forks. Instead, nascent strands may be protected by the simple expedient of promoting restart. We also report that the efficiency of fork reactivation is not affected in polB mutants.

Replication fork stalling and cell cycle arrest in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli

Faithful duplication of the genome relies on the ability to cope with an imperfect template. We investigated replication of UV-damaged DNA in Escherichia coli and found that ongoing replication stops for at least 15-20 min before resuming. Undamaged origins of replication (oriC) continue to fire at the normal rate and in a DnaA-dependent manner. UV irradiation also induces substantial DnaA-independent replication. These two factors add substantially to the DNA synthesis detected after irradiation and together mask the delay in the progression of pre-existing forks in assays measuring net synthesis. All DNA synthesis after UV depends on DnaC, implying that replication restart of blocked forks requires DnaB loading and possibly the entire assembly of new replisomes. Restart appears to occur synchronously when most lesions have been removed. This raises the possibility that restart and lesion removal are coupled. Both restart and cell division suffer long delays if lesion removal is prevented, but restart can occur. Our data fit well with models invoking the stalling of replication forks and their extensive processing before replication can restart. Delayed restart avoids the dangers of excessive recombination that might result if forks skipped over lesion after lesion, leaving many gaps in their wake.

Fragmentation of Replicating Chromosomes Triggered by Uracil in DNA

The dut mutants of Escherichia coli fail to hydrolyze dUTP and thus incorporate uracil into their DNA, suffering from chromosomal fragmentation. The postulated mechanism for the double-strand DNA breaks is clustered uracil excision, which requires high density of DNA-uracils. However, we did not find enough uracil residues or excision nicks in the DNA of dut mutants to account for clustered uracil excision. Using a dut recBC(Ts) mutant of E.coli to inquire into the mechanism of uracil-triggered chromosomal fragmentation, we show that this fragmentation requires DNA replication and, in turn, inhibits replication of the chromosomal terminus. As a result, origin-containing sub-chromosomal fragments accumulate in dut recBC conditions, indicating preferential demise of replication bubbles. We propose that the basic mechanism of the uracil-triggered chromosomal fragmentation is replication fork collapse at uracil-excision nicks. Possible explanations for the low level terminus fragmentation are also considered.

A broadening view of recombinational DNA repair in bacteria

Recombinational DNA repair is both the most complex and least understood of DNA repair pathways. In bacterial cells grown under normal laboratory conditions (without a DNA damaging treatment other than an aerobic environment), a substantial number (10-50%) of the replication forks originating at oriC encounter a DNA lesion or strand break. When this occurs, repair is mediated by an elaborate set of recombinational DNA repair pathways which encompass most of the enzymes involved in DNA metabolism. Four steps are discussed: (i) The replication fork stalls and/or collapses. (ii) Recombination enzymes are recruited to the location of the lesion, and function with nearly perfect efficiency and fidelity. (iii) Additional enzymatic systems, including the phiX174-type primosome (or repair primosome), then function in the origin-independent reassembly of the replication fork. (iv) Frequent recombination associated with recombinational DNA repair leads to the formation of dimeric chromosomes, which are monomerized by the XerCD site-specific recombination system.

Recovery of DNA replication in UV-damaged Escherichia coli

Following exposure to UV light DNA replication stops and then resumes. The SOS response is required for the restoration of replication. Replication recovery occurs in lexA(Ind) cells carrying a high constitutive level of RecA protein. Replication is also affected by UmuCD proteins, photoreactivation, and excision repair. In addition, there is a constitutive and recA independent way to replicate over UV photoproducts associated with the production of gaps in daughter DNA strands. There are two ways to account for the replication in UV-irradiated cells. A stalled replication fork can be reactivated. Alternatively, a replication fork could be destroyed irreparably, with no available way to complete the round of replication. In that case, postirradiation replication could be due exclusively to replication forks assembled de novo at the origin(s). Changes in replication initiation are observed following UV irradiation. Initiations are first inhibited and then stimulated. They become independent of de novo protein synthesis and sometimes do not stop in dnaA(ts) mutants shifted to 42 degrees C. Although the inducible functions are involved in the recovery of replication at different levels of UV damage, some modifications of the replication initiation mechanism appear to be specific to severely damaged cells. Such modifications seem to include the dnaA(ts) independence for initiations and the transient initiation inhibition. RecA protein can be directly involved both in the modification of initiation and in reactivation of the stalled replication forks. Although the restoration of replication depends on the SOS response a synthesis of some protein(s) that do not belong to the LexA regulon seems to be required as well. These proteins can be under RecA control and one of their functions may be to inhibit the rnhA gene. Certain recA mutations may selectively affect different mechanisms of the replication recovery (namely, recA430, recA727, recA718, recA1730). Overproduction of the photoreactivating enzyme in the dark could influence UmuCD activity in replication. The UmuCD function appears to be blocked in strains carrying the dnaE1026 mutation or overproducing the dnaQ protein. For some unknown reason the UmuCD-associated replication mechanism is the only one available for phage with damaged DNA.

Replication of damaged DNA and the molecular mechanism of ultraviolet light mutagenesis

On UV irradiation of Escherichia coli cells, DNA replication is transiently arrested to allow removal of DNA damage by DNA repair mechanisms. This is followed by a resumption of DNA replication, a major recovery function whose mechanism is poorly understood. During the post-UV irradiation period the SOS stress response is induced, giving rise to a multiplicity of phenomena, including UV mutagenesis. The prevailing model is that UV mutagenesis occurs by the filling in of single-stranded DNA gaps present opposite UV lesions in the irradiated chromosome. These gaps can be formed by the activity of DNA replication or repair on the damaged DNA. The gap filling involves polymerization through UV lesions (also termed bypass synthesis or error-prone repair) by DNA polymerase III. The primary source of mutations is the incorporation of incorrect nucleotides opposite lesions. UV mutagenesis is a genetically regulated process, and it requires the SOS-inducible proteins RecA, UmuD, and UmuC. It may represent a minor repair pathway or a genetic program to accelerate evolution of cells under environmental stress conditions.

DNA-replication recovery inhibition and subsequent reinitiation in UV-radiation-damaged E. coli: a strategy for survival

Using the incorporation of [14C]thymine to measure DNA accumulation, it was shown that exposure of the B/r strain of Escherichia coli to 10 J/m2 of ultraviolet radiation (UV) inhibits replication for about 20 min, but then resumption of replication occurs. Pulse-labelling with [3H]thymidine after exposure of the WT strain to this fluence confirmed the transient inhibition and recovery of DNA replication. After recovery, the rate of accumulation of DNA in the culture increases, to exceed that of the exponentially growing culture, so that eventually the amount of DNA almost equals that of the unirradiated culture. After a higher fluence (20 J/m2), an inhibition of replication recovery was revealed. This fluence delays the reinitiation of DNA accumulation in the culture, measured by [14C]thymine incorporation, for 25 min more, in addition to the 20-min recovery period. This finding was confirmed with pulse-labelling studies, which revealed that the higher exposure represses the rates of replication for 45 min before replication at the normal rate reinitiates in the culture. It was proposed that the inhibition of recovery revealed by these investigations is effected by the UV-induction of an active DNA-replication recovery-inhibition process. With the uvrA strain, rate studies revealed that 1.5 J/m2 of UV (a reduced fluence necessary because of the greater sensitivity of the strain) induces a transient inhibition of DNA replication, with considerable recovery following. Exposure to 3.0 J/m2 induces the transient inhibition of replication, followed by massive recovery inhibition after 20 min of incubation. With uvrA recA, both the lower and the higher fluence resulted in an immediate block of replication with no recovery, confirming the recA gene dependency of the recovery process. The decrease in rate of replication comparable to that seen in the uvrA strain after 20 min, and taken as evidence of the function of the recovery-inhibition process, was not seen. The evidence supports the concept that a process somehow triggered by higher UV fluences functions to repress replication temporarily, presumably allowing time for repair processes to take place before replication overruns closely linked pyrimidine dimers on opposite strands to create lethal lesions.

Mechanism of transient inhibition of DNA synthesis in ultraviolet-irradiated E. coli: inhibition is independent of recA whilst recovery requires RecA protein itself and an additional, inducible SOS function

The mechanism of the inhibition and of the recovery of DNA synthesis in E. coli following UV-irradiation was analysed in several mutants defective in repair or in the regulation of the RecA-LexA dependent SOS response. Several lines of evidence indicated that inhibition is not an inducible function and is probably due to the direct effect of lesions in the template blocking replisome movement. Recovery of DNA synthesis after UV was largely unaffected by mutations in the uvrA, recB or umuC genes. Resumption of DNA synthesis does however require protein synthesis and the regulatory action of recA. Experiments with a recA constitutive mutant and recA 200 (temperature sensitive RecA) demonstrated that RecA protein itself is directly required but is not sufficient for recovery of DNA synthesis. We therefore propose that recovery of DNA synthesis depends upon the concerted activity of RecA and the synthesis of an inducible Irr (induced replisome reactivation) factor under RecA control. We suggest that the mechanism of recovery involves the action of Irr and RecA to promote movement of replisomes past non-instructive lesions, uncoupled from polymerisation and/or that Irr and RecA are required to promote re-initiation of a stalled replication complex downstream of a UV-lesion subsequent to such an uncoupling step.

The dnaA gene product is not required during stable chromosome replication in Escherichia coli

Exposure of Escherichia coli dnaA strains to UV light results in a transient resumption of chromosome replication at 42 degrees C, the temperature restrictive to these mutants. Capability of dnaA mutants to replicate DNA at 42 degrees C can be stabilized, however, when either protein or RNA synthesis is inhibited 60 min after UV irradiation. DNA synthesis proceeds for several hours under these conditions. These results indicate that dnaA dependent transcription is not involved in initiation of chromosome cycles during stable DNA synthesis.