Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. The conjunctive mechanism of the XY bivalent

Achiasmy: Male Fruit Flies Are Not Ready to Mix

Maintenance of the chromosomal copy number over generations and recombination between homologous chromosomes are hallmarks of meiotic cell division. This genetic exchange that take place during gamete formation leads to genetic diversity, the main driving force behind natural selection. Formation of chiasmata, the physical link between homologous chromosomes during meiosis, is a requisite for recombination. In addition, chiasmata also aid in proper segregation of homologous chromosomes and has a major impact on reproductive fitness. Given these facts it is intriguing that many insect species have forgone the need for genetic exchange between homologous chromosomes during meiosis. Geneticists for several decades knew that meiotic crossover and recombination is absent in Drosophila males and some female lepidopterans, a condition termed achiasmy. However, a good understanding of the mechanisms that cause achiasmy and the evolutionary benefits of achiasmy is currently lacking. In this article we will discuss possible genetic and molecular basis of achiasmy in male Drosophila.

Meiosis in male Drosophila

Meiosis entails sorting and separating both homologous and sister chromatids. The mechanisms for connecting sister chromatids and homologs during meiosis are highly conserved and include specialized forms of the cohesin complex and a tightly regulated homolog synapsis/recombination pathway designed to yield regular crossovers between homologous chromatids. Drosophila male meiosis is of special interest because it dispenses with large segments of the standard meiotic script, particularly recombination, synapsis and the associated structures. Instead, Drosophila relies on a unique protein complex composed of at least two novel proteins, SNM and MNM, to provide stable connections between homologs during meiosis I. Sister chromatid cohesion in Drosophila is mediated by cohesins, ring-shaped complexes that entrap sister chromatids. However, unlike other eukaryotes Drosophila does not rely on the highly conserved Rec8 cohesin in meiosis, but instead utilizes two novel cohesion proteins, ORD and SOLO, which interact with the SMC1/3 cohesin components in providing meiotic cohesion.

Composition and epigenetic markers of heterochromatin in the aphid Aphis nerii (Hemiptera: Aphididae)

A detailed karyotype analysis of the oleander aphid Aphis nerii focusing on the distribution, molecular composition and epigenetic modifications of heterochromatin was done in order to better understand the structure and evolution of holocentric/holokinetic chromosomes in aphids. The female karyotype (2n = 8) consisted of 3 pairs of autosomes and a pair of X chromosomes that were the longest elements in the karyotype and carried a single, terminally located nucleolar organizer region. Males showed 2n = 7 chromosomes due to the presence of a single X chromosome. Heterochromatin was located in the X chromosomes only and consisted of 4 satellite DNAs that have been identified. A. nerii constitutive heterochromatin was enriched in mono-, di- and tri-methylated H3 histones and HP1 proteins but, interestingly, it lacked DNA methylation that was widespread in euchromatic chromosomal regions. These results suggest that aphid heterochromatin is assembled and condensed without any involvement of DNA methylation.

Proximal vs. distal collochores in Coleopteran chromosomes

One important mechanical requirement of meiotic chromosomes is to maintain sister chromatids in contact until the onset of anaphase-2. Monocentric chromosomes normally achieve this by means of specialized pericentric regions. However, in some cases the sites of the last chromatid contact can be shifted from such regions to the distal tips of the chromatids, or even to interstitial segments. It is proposed that all three variants, documented by observations in male meiosis of certain flea beetles, can be accommodated by the common term collochore.

INCENP and Aurora B promote meiotic sister chromatid cohesion through localization of the Shugoshin MEI-S332 in Drosophila

The chromosomal passenger complex protein INCENP is required in mitosis for chromosome condensation, spindle attachment and function, and cytokinesis. Here, we show that INCENP has an essential function in the specialized behavior of centromeres in meiosis. Mutations affecting Drosophila incenp profoundly affect chromosome segregation in both meiosis I and II, due, at least in part, to premature sister chromatid separation in meiosis I. INCENP binds to the cohesion protector protein MEI-S332, which is also an excellent in vitro substrate for Aurora B kinase. A MEI-S332 mutant that is only poorly phosphorylated by Aurora B is defective in localization to centromeres. These results implicate the chromosomal passenger complex in directly regulating MEI-S332 localization and, therefore, the control of sister chromatid cohesion in meiosis.

Isolation and cytogenetic characterization of male meiotic mutants of Drosophila melanogaster

Proper segregation of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I is ensured by pairing of homologs and maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion. In male Drosophila melanogaster, meiosis is achiasmatic and homologs pair at limited chromosome regions called pairing sites. We screened for male meiotic mutants to identify genes required for normal pairing and disjunction of homologs. Nondisjunction of the sex and the fourth chromosomes in male meiosis was scored as a mutant phenotype. We screened 2306 mutagenized and 226 natural population-derived second and third chromosomes and obtained seven mutants representing different loci on the second chromosome and one on the third. Five mutants showed relatively mild effects (<10% nondisjunction). mei(2)yh149 and mei(2)yoh7134 affected both the sex and the fourth chromosomes, mei(2)yh217 produced possible sex chromosome-specific nondisjunction, and mei(2)yh15 and mei(2)yh137 produced fourth chromosome-specific nondisjunction. mei(2)yh137 was allelic to the teflon gene required for autosomal pairing. Three mutants exhibited severe defects, producing >10% nondisjunction of the sex and/or the fourth chromosomes. mei(2)ys91 (a new allele of the orientation disruptor gene) and mei(3)M20 induced precocious separation of sister chromatids as early as prometa-phase I. mei(2)yh92 predominantly induced nondisjunction at meiosis I that appeared to be the consequence of failure of the separation of paired homologous chromosomes.

Isolation and Cytogenetic Characterization of Male Meiotic Mutants of Drosophila melanogaster

Proper segregation of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I is ensured by pairing of homologs and maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion. In male Drosophila melanogaster, meiosis is achiasmatic and homologs pair at limited chromosome regions called pairing sites. We screened for male meiotic mutants to identify genes required for normal pairing and disjunction of homologs. Nondisjunction of the sex and the fourth chromosomes in male meiosis was scored as a mutant phenotype. We screened 2306 mutagenized and 226 natural population-derived second and third chromosomes and obtained seven mutants representing different loci on the second chromosome and one on the third. Five mutants showed relatively mild effects (&lt;10% nondisjunction). mei(2)yh149 and mei(2)yoh7134 affected both the sex and the fourth chromosomes, mei(2)yh217 produced possible sex chromosome-specific nondisjunction, and mei(2)yh15 and mei(2)yh137 produced fourth chromosome-specific nondisjunction. mei(2)yh137 was allelic to the teflon gene required for autosomal pairing. Three mutants exhibited severe defects, producing &gt;10% nondisjunction of the sex and/or the fourth chromosomes. mei(2)ys91 (a new allele of the orientation disruptor gene) and mei(3)M20 induced precocious separation of sister chromatids as early as prometaphase I. mei(2)yh92 predominantly induced nondisjunction at meiosis I that appeared to be the consequence of failure of the separation of paired homologous chromosomes.

The teflon gene is required for maintenance of autosomal homolog pairing at meiosis I in male Drosophila melanogaster

In recombination-proficient organisms, chiasmata appear to mediate associations between homologs at metaphase of meiosis I. It is less clear how homolog associations are maintained in organisms that lack recombination, such as male Drosophila. In lieu of chiasmata and synaptonemal complexes, there must be molecules that balance poleward forces exerted across homologous centromeres. Here we describe the genetic and cytological characterization of four EMS-induced mutations in teflon (tef), a gene involved in this process in Drosophila melanogaster. All four alleles are male specific and cause meiosis I-specific nondisjunction of the autosomes. They do not measurably perturb sex chromosome segregation, suggesting that there are differences in the genetic control of autosome and sex chromosome segregation in males. Meiotic transmission of univalent chromosomes is unaffected in tef mutants, implicating the tef product in a pairing-dependent process. The segregation of translocations between sex chromosomes and autosomes is altered in tef mutants in a manner that supports this hypothesis. Consistent with these genetic observations, cytological examination of meiotic chromosomes suggests a role of tef in regulating or mediating pairing of autosomal bivalents at meiosis I. We discuss implications of this finding in regard to the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes and the mechanisms that ensure chromosome disjunction in the absence of recombination.

The role of rDNA genes in X chromosome association in the aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum

Silver staining of mitotic metaphases of the aphid A. pisum reveals the presence of argentophilic bridges connecting the two X chromosomes. The presence of nucleolar material connecting sex chromosomes seems to be quite a common phenomenon in organisms belonging to very different phyla, and suggests a role of nucleolar proteins in chromosome association and disjunction. In somatic cells of A. pisum, bridges connecting X chromosomes are detectable not only after silver staining but also after CMA3 staining. This finding suggests that GC rich DNA is involved in this type of association. Molecular analysis of rDNA intergenic spacers shows several 247 bp repeats containing short sequences having a high level of homology with the chi sequence of Escherichia coli and with the consensus core region of human hypervariable minisatellites. Moreover, each 247 bp repeat presents a perfect copy of a promoter sequence for polymerase I. These aphid repeats show structural homologies with a 240 bp repeat, which is considered to be responsible for sex chromosome pairing in Drosophila, not only in view of their common presence within rDNA spacers but also for their length and structure. The presence of chi sequences in the IGS of A. pisum, by promoting unequal crossing-over between rDNA genes, could thus give rise to the nucleolar organizing region (NOR) heteromorphism described in different aphid species. Although X pairing at NORs is fundamental in aphid male determination, the presence of heteromorphism of rDNA genes does not inhibit male determination in the A. pisum clone utilized for our experiments.

The license to pair: identification of meiotic pairing sites in Drosophila

Sites for pairing and segregation of achiasmatic bivalents have been characterized in both male and female meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. The major sex chromosome pairing site in male meiosis corresponds to the intergenic spacer repeats of the rDNA arrays, which are located in the heterochromatin of the X and Y. The sex chromosome pairing sites in females are also heterochromatic, but involve different repeated sequences. In males, weak pairing sites are widely distributed along euchromatin but not heterochromatin of chromosome 2, an autosome. One strong site for male meiotic pairing has been identified on chromosome 2; it overlaps with the his locus, which contains the repetitive structural genes for the histones. In females the sites for pairing of chromosome 4, another autosome, are restricted to the heterochromatin. Thus for both sex chromosomes and autosomes, sites for achiasmatic pairing are heterochromatic in females but euchromatic (except for the rDNA) in males. The possible roles of sequence repetition and of transcription in chromosome pairing are discussed.

Meiosis in Drosophila males. I. The question of separate conjunctive mechanisms for the XY and autosomal bivalents

The conjunctive mechanism of the XY bivalent is believed to differ from that of the autosomal bivalents in the achiasmate Drosophila melanogaster male. It has been proposed that hypothetical cohesive elements, termed collochores, hold the X and Y chromosomes together at or near their nucleolar organizing regions (NORs) and that collochores are not exhibited by autosomal bivalents. In electron micrographs, unique fibrillar material is observed between the X and Y chromosomes at the synaptic site. Recently, the 240 bp nontranscribed spacer associated with rRNA genes at the NOR has been implicated as the essential DNA sequence for XY pairing. To test whether this DNA sequence is always associated with XY pairing and to determine its relationship to the unique fibrillar material, we studied the XY bivalent in Drosophila simulans. The D. simulans Y chromosome has few, if any, rRNA genes, but does have a large block (3,000 kb or 12,500 copies) of the nontranscribed spacer repeat located at the distal end of its long arm. This is in contrast to the D. melanogaster Y, which has the repeat located among rRNA genes on its short arm. Using light and electron microscopy, we show that the X does indeed pair with the distal end of the long arm of the D. simulans Y. However, no fibrillar material is evident in serial thin sections of the D. simulans XY bivalent, suggesting that this material (in D. melanogaster) may be remnants of the NOR rather than a morphological manifestation of the hypothetical collochores.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

How meiotic cells deal with non-exchange chromosomes

The chromosomes which segregate in anaphase I of meiosis are usually physically bound together through chiasmata. This association is necessary for proper segregation, since univalents sort independently from one another in the first meiotic division and this frequently leads to genetically unbalanced offspring. There are, however, a number of species where genetic exchanges in the form of meiotic cross-overs, the prerequisite of the formation of chiasmata, are routinely missing in one sex or between specific chromosomes. These species nevertheless manage to segregate these non-exchange chromosomes. There are four direct modes for associating achiasmatic chromosomes: (a) modified SC, (b) adhesion of chromatids comparable to somatic pairing, (c) 'stickiness' of heterochromatin or (d) specific 'segregation bodies', consisting of material structurally different from chromatin. There is also the possibility that the spindle-possibly joining forces with the kinetochores--carries out the faithful segregation of univalents which are not directly physically attached to one another. Finally, amphitelic orientation of univalents in metaphase I and pairing of the chromatids in meiosis II appear to ensure correct segregation as well.

Structure, mitotic and meiotic behaviour, and stability of centromere-like elements devoid of chromosome arms in the fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae)

Minute elements detected in Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae, Diptera) lack chromosome arms but carry centromeres and possess kinetochore microtubules in mitosis as well as in meiosis. These centromere-like elements (CLEs) were present in two geographically independent strains of the fly. This indicates that their origin is not a recent event in the karyotype evolution of M. scalaris and that they are rather stable constituents of the karyotype. Most often, two CLEs were found in gonial and somatic mitosis. Spermatocytes contained one CLE. Two individuals examined deviated from this rule in that a metaphase spermatogonium showed three and an anaphase spermatogonium eight CLEs. These animals are believed to have been aneuploid relative to the CLEs. An analysis of spermatogonial division revealed that the CLEs behave like the centromeres of the regular chromosomes but seem to separate precociously, since they were closer to the spindle poles in late anaphase cells. Whereas the size of the CLEs was not significantly different between mitotic cells and secondary spermatocytes, the CLEs in primary spermatocytes were larger in volume by a factor of about 4.5 than those in mitosis and meiosis II. The additional material is interpreted as a glue that holds two CLEs together. This, in turn, is a prerequisite for orderly segregation. The function of the CLEs is not known. They are considered as B chromosomes reduced to the minimum required for segregation, the centromere.

Differential mechanisms governing segregation of a univalent in oocytes and spermatocytes of Drosophila melanogaster

In tricomplex heterozygotes in Drosophila melanogaster three metacentric autosomes (the TRI chromosomes) appear as a trivalent in meiosis while one autosome consisting of two homologous arms attached to the same centromere (a compound) behaves as an obligatory univalent. Cytological analysis of meiosis of tri-complex heterozygotes indicates that in oocytes the univalent compound behaves non-independently in relation to segregation of the trivalent. The compound is distributed preferentially to the same pole as one TRI chromosome. In spermatocytes the compound is distributed at random. In some oocytes the directed segregation is shown to be due to a disjunctional interaction between the compound and one partner of the trivalent at the same time as the other two chromosomes of the trivalent are separating from each other. The basic difference between the segregational mechanisms in the two sexes is discussed with a review of evidence indicating that in males segregation is determined by physical linkage that produces a stable orientation of the homologues at metaphase I. On the other hand, both genetic and cytological evidence indicate that in females a physical linkage (a chiasma) is non-essential for maintenance of co-orientation and stability after the onset of prometaphase. Genetic and cytological evidence support the hypothesis that disjunction is predetermined by non-random arrangement of the centromeric regions of chromosomes in the chromocentre - a suprachromosomal organization characteristic of maturing oocytes.

Drosophila ribosomal RNA genes function as an X-Y pairing site during male meiosis

In Drosophila melanogaster males, the sex chromosomes pair during meiosis in the centric X heterochromatin and at the base of the short arm of the Y (YS), in the vicinity of the nucleolus organizers. X chromosomes deficient for the pairing region segregate randomly from the Y. In this report we show that a single ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene stimulates X-Y pairing and disjunction when inserted onto a heterochromatically deficient X chromosome by P element-mediated transformation. We also show that insert-containing X chromosomes pair at the site of insertion, that autosomal rDNA inserts do not affect X-Y pairing or disjunction, and that the strength of an X pairing site is proportional to the dose of ectopic rRNA genes. These results demonstrate that rRNA genes can promote X-Y pairing and disjunction and imply that the nucleolus organizers function as X-Y pairing sites in wild-type Drosophila males.

Segregation of centric Y-autosome translocations in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Segregation determinants in males

A special screening procedure for the detection of induced Y-autosome translocations with centric breakpoints was applied. A series of Experimental stocks was constructed, each containing a different half of one of the induced T(Y; 2)'s (T element). The three other elements that were involved in the segregation experiments in each stock were a sex chromosome (X element), an inverted chromosome 2 (A element), and a free arm of chromosome 2 (F element). It is not feasible to determine the relative frequencies of all the 16 possible gamete types by mating an Experimental stock to one tester, nor to different testers that have each at least one class of progeny of the same genotype. Each Experimental stock was mated to four different Tester stocks and the data were calibrated so that a coherent segregation pattern could be obtained.

Segregation patterns in meiosis of males from 15 Experimental stocks, each with a different T element were studied. In most Experimental stocks the T element was of the left autosomal arm, while the F element was of the right autosomal arm. In four Experimental stocks the X element segregated independently of the A, F and T elements. In these Group 1 stocks, both the F and the T elements disjoined regularly from the A element. It was concluded that the T element of these stocks had no sex-chromosome disjunction determinants (‘S-determinants’) to interact with the determinants on the X element. Both the T elements and the F elements carried autosomal disjunction determinants (‘H-determinants’) that secured the segregation of the autosomal elements. The H-determinants of the left autosomal arm were qualitatively different from those of the right arm.

In the remaining 11 Group-2 Experimental stocks the X and T elements disjoined regularly, indicating the presence of S-determinants on the T elements of these stocks. The segregation of the T and the A elements in these stocks varied from nearly complete dependence to complete independence. It was concluded that this gradation reflected differences in the quantity of H-determinants present on the T elements of these Experimental stocks. It was impossible to discriminate between a model of continuous H determinants activity and one of a finite discrete number of determinants. The results do not agree with the claim that there are no autosomal disjunction determinants in the proximal heterochromatin of chromosome 2.

The S-determinants on theBsYy+chromosome were located both adjacent to the centromere and distally on the long arm. The latter were probably translocated to the Y chromosome together with theBsmarker.

Bivalent behavior in Drosophila melanogaster males containing the In(1)sc4Lsc8RX chromosome

The sex chromosome bivalent was examined in Drosophila melanogaster males possessing the In(1)sc4Lsc8R X chromosome. Three-dimensional reconstructions from electron micrographs of serially cut thin sections were made. A large proportion of the kinetochores of In(1)sc4Lsc8R/Y bivalents did not face opposite poles during metaphase I and anaphase I. This suggests that In(1)sc4Lsc8R/Y bivalents may have difficulty achieving bipolar stability. Delay in achieving bipolar stability could contribute to the nondisjunctional behavior found in In(1)sc4Lsc8R/Y males.