Impaired liver function and long-term prognosis after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Anatomic versus non-anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, do we have an answer? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anatomic resection (AR) is widely performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but it is generally not considered superior to non-anatomic resection (NAR) in terms of prognosis. So we compared the prognosis of AR with that of NAR for HCC.

METHODS

We searched for articles about AR versus NAR for HCC published between January 1998 and December 2018 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Wanfang database. Meta-analysis was performed on patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, operative characteristics, perioperative outcomes and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 38 studies involving 9122 patients were included: 5062 were in the AR group and 4060 in the NAR group. Only one study included in our meta-analysis was randomized controlled trial, and others were comparative cohort studies. The AR group had an advantage over NAR group in the aspect of age, liver cirrhosis level and liver reserve function; but had a disadvantage in the aspect of tumor size, AFP level, operation time, blood loss, microvascular invasion, pathological differentiation and postoperative complication. The AR group gained 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) benefits versus NAR group, but there was significant heterogeneity between groups in terms of patient and tumor characteristics.

CONCLUSION

AR is superior to NAR regarding the long-term outcomes considering the relatively acceptable heterogeneity. More prospective randomized controlled trials are required to further confirm the actual effect of AR or NAR on survival for HCC with less heterogeneity.

Perioperative and Long-Term Outcome for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of Major Versus Minor Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was to investigate both short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing curative-intent resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) stratified by extent of hepatic resection relative to overall final pathological margin status.

METHODS

One thousand twenty-three patients with ICC who underwent curative-intent resection were identified from a multi-institutional database. Demographic, clinicopathological, and operative data, as well as overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared among patients undergoing major and minor resection before and after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Overall, 608 (59.4%) patients underwent major hepatectomy, while 415 (40.6%) had a minor resection. Major hepatectomy was more frequently performed among patients who had large, multiple, and bilobar tumors. Roughly half of patients (n = 294, 48.4%) developed a postoperative complication following major hepatectomy versus only one fourth of patients (n = 113, 27.2%) after minor resection (p < 0.001). In the propensity model, patients who underwent major hepatectomy had an equivalent OS and RFS versus patients who had a minor hepatectomy (median OS, 38 vs. 37 months, p = 0.556; and median RFS, 20 vs. 18 months, p = 0.635). Patients undergoing major resection had comparable OS and RFS with wide surgical margin (≥10 and 5-9 mm), but improved RFS when surgical margin was narrow (1-4 mm) versus minor resection in the propensity model. In the Cox regression model, tumor characteristics and surgical margin were independently associated with long-term outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Major hepatectomy for ICC was not associated with an overall survival benefit, yet was associated with increased perioperative morbidity. Margin width, rather than the extent of resection, affected long-term outcomes. Radical parenchymal-sparing resection should be advocated if a margin clearance of ≥5 mm can be achieved.

Outcomes of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the era of laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Although there are very few reports of laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy (RPS), we believe this is a promising operative method for lesions confined to the right posterior section of the liver.

METHOD

Between September 2003 and June 2012, laparoscopic liver resection was performed in 408 patients at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. We analyzed the clinical data of 24 patients who underwent laparoscopic RPS for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and compared outcomes with patients who underwent open RPS (n = 19).

RESULTS

The mean operation time was 567 minutes, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 10.6 ± 4.8 days. The mean tumor-free margin was 3.0 ± 5.8 cm. There were no deaths or major complications. Two complications occurred, which were managed by percutaneous drainage. There were three conversions to laparotomy because of an insufficient tumor margin. These patients were treated when we had limited experience of laparoscopic resection. Extended RPS (n = 6), which involved RPS and resection of the right hepatic vein, was performed to achieve an adequate margin if the tumor was located very close to the right hepatic vein. The mean operation time was longer in laparoscopy group than that in open group (P < .001), but there was no difference in the mean resection margin (P = .450) and the rate of postoperative complications (P = .380) between 2 groups. There was no statistical difference in 5-year overall patient survival rate (79.1% vs 77.7%; P = .754) and the 5-year disease-free survival rate (42.2% vs 51.5%; P = .752) between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic RPS is feasible when performed by experienced surgeons, but further refinements of the surgical technique are needed to reduce operation time.

Surgery in patients with portal hypertension: a preoperative checklist and strategies for attenuating risk

Patients with liver disease and portal hypertension are at increased risk of complications from surgery. Recent advances have allowed better optimization of patients with cirrhosis before surgery and a reduction in postoperative complications. Despite this progress, the estimation of surgical risk in a patient with cirrhosis is challenging. The MELD score has shown promise in predicting postoperative mortality compared with the Child-Turcotte-Pugh score. This article addresses current concepts in the perioperative evaluation of patients with liver disease and portal tension, including a preoperative liver assessment (POLA) checklist that may be useful towards mitigating perioperative complications.

A survival benefit of major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma identified by preoperative [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with well-preserved hepatic function

AIMS

Hepatic resection can cure hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the optimal extent of resection remains controversial. Major hepatectomy could minimize a tumor recurrence, but it is harmful due to decreased hepatic functional reserve. [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) scans are known as their reflection tumor differentiation and biological activity in HCC. To evaluate a benefit of major hepatectomy for HCC, we performed this retrospective analysis in patients with well-preserved hepatic function, and further analyzed in the subset identified by preoperative FDG-PET.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 189 patients with HCC who underwent curative resection between August 2004 and December 2010 at two institutes. All patients underwent anatomical resection, either by major or minor hepatectomy.

RESULTS

Median overall survival did not differ significantly between the major and minor hepatectomy groups (29.4 versus 26.3 months, p = 0.269). However, the major hepatectomy group had a better recurrence-free survival (24.5 versus 19.9 months, p = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, the presence of intrahepatic metastasis independently predicted overall survival (p = 0.009), but other examined variables did not. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival were significantly better following major hepatectomy rather than minor hepatectomy in patients whose preoperative FDG-PET indicated that the maximum standardized uptake value of the tumor (SUVtumor) was ≥4 and the tumor-to-nontumor SUV ratio (TNR) was ≥1.5.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that preoperative FDG-PET may be useful in identifying patients with favorable hepatic reserve who are most likely to benefit from major rather than minor hepatectomy.

Ultrasound-guided microwave coagulation assists anatomical hepatic resection

PURPOSE

We describe a new technique of ultrasound (US)-guided microwave coagulation (MC) of the Glissonean pedicle, performed before transection to control the inflow and select the resection area. This report introduces our procedure and evaluates the outcomes of patients treated using this technique.

METHODS

The Glissonean pedicles feeding the segment or cone unit were coagulated by US-guided MC, after which transection was performed. We used this US-guided MC technique to perform anatomical resections in 12 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (MC group). We compared the outcomes of this group with those of a historical group of 10 patients who underwent conventional hepatectomy (control group). The two groups were well matched for age, tumor size, location, and type of hepatectomy.

RESULTS

The mean operative times were similar, but the mean blood loss was significantly lower the in MC group than in the control group. Recurrence developed in four patients from the MC group, but local recurrence was not observed. Bile leakage occurred in one patient from the MC group, but the incidences of postoperative complications did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our procedure allows anatomical resection to be performed safely and easily, and helps prevent intrahepatic metastasis via portal flow during the transection.

Prognostic impact of preoperative the branched-chain amino acid to the tyrosine ratio in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after initial hepatectomy

INTRODUCTION

The branched-chain amino acid/tyrosine ratio (BTR) reflects the amino acid balance and the severity of liver disease. The aim of the present study was to determine the relationship between BTR and liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Furthermore, we evaluated the clinical usefulness of BTR as a prognostic indicator of disease-free and overall patient survival after initial hepatectomy.

METHODS

Between January 2004 and December 2008, 105 consecutive HCC patients who underwent initial hepatectomy were enrolled in this study. The correlation between BTR and preoperative liver functional indicators was evaluated. The cutoff levels of BTR for 2-year survival prediction were evaluated using a dot blot diagram. The patients were divided into high BTR (4.5 or higher) and low BTR (4.4 or lower) groups and these were compared in terms of clinical variables such as liver functional indicators, operative variables, and tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

The preoperative BTR level decreased according to the severity of liver disease. BTR was correlated with the albumin, bilirubin, and prealbumin levels, as well as the prothrombin time. Although the preoperative liver function was significantly different between the high BTR and low BTR groups, the operative variables and tumor-related variables were not found to be significantly different. Postoperative complications in the high BTR group were significantly less frequent than in the low BTR group (p = 0.003). Disease-free and overall patient survival in the high BTR group were significantly longer than in the low BTR group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.021, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

BTR reflected the pathological liver background with a high correlation to the other liver functional indicators. BTR is thus considered to be a useful marker to predict postoperative complications, disease-free survival, and overall survival of HCC patients after initial hepatectomy. It is, therefore, a useful indicator of liver function and a predictor for the risk of cancer recurrence and overall survival in HCC patients.

Prognostic factors and 10-year survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after curative hepatectomy

PURPOSE

There were contrary results about the effects of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positivity on the long-term survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after curative resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Medical records of 170 HCC patients who underwent curative liver resections were retrospectively reviewed. The 10-year survival rate and correlations among clinical, laboratory, and pathological data, especially HBeAg, were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients survived more than 10 years. The 10-year actual overall survival (OS) rate was 30.6%, and the actual disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 24.1%. The median OS and DFS were 76 and 35 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, HBeAg positivity (P = 0.032; hazard ratio [HR], 3.041), presence of a satellite nodule (P = 0.007; HR, 4.166), and elevated ICG R15 (P = 0.003; HR, 4.915) had a significant negative correlation with the 10-year DFS rate. In addition, HBeAg positivity (P = 0.044; HR, 3.725) and recurrence (recur within 1 year, P < 0.001; HR, 41.296; recur after 1 year, P = 0.03; HR, 4.848) were found as independent factors which were negatively correlated to the 10-year OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of HBeAg was significantly correlated to DFS and OS after curative resection for HCC. Active treatment of B viral hepatitis before and after surgery should be provided to prolong survival in patients with 5-10-cm HCC.

Minor versus major hepatic resection for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients: a 20-year experience

BACKGROUND

The choice between minor versus major resection or anatomic versus nonantatomic resection for small (<5 cm) solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis is controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after minor or major hepatic resection for small solitary HCC in cirrhotic patients.

METHODS

Between January 1983 and December 2002, patients with solitary HCC of < or = 5 cm in size who had histologically proven liver cirrhosis and microscopically tumor-free margin were included. These selected patients underwent either minor (< or = 2 segments) or major (> or = 3 segments) hepatectomy.

RESULTS

In 373 patients, 259 underwent minor and 114 underwent major hepatectomy. Patients in the minor resection group had more severe underlying liver disease (P = .005). Therefore, only 29.3% received anatomic resection in the minor resection group in comparison with 72.8% in the major hepatectomy group (P = .0001). No difference was found in postoperative morbidity (P = .105), mortality (P =.222), intrahepatic recurrence (P = .742), and 5-year DFS and OS (31.6% vs 31.8%, P = .932 and 50.7% vs 44.0%, P = .114) in both groups. The type of operative resection was not found to be a significant factor affecting survival in univariate analysis, but the preoperative liver function (alanine aminotransferase [AST] or alanine aminotransferase [ALT], serum albumin, or Child-Pugh status), tumor characteristics (alpha-feto protein, size, and presence of daughter nodules), and blood transfusion were found to be independent factors that affect the DFS and OS in a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The severity of cirrhosis and tumor characteristics depicts long-term survival rather than the type of resection in HCC.

Perioperative risk assessment for patients with cirrhosis and liver disease

Patients with cirrhosis are at an increased risk of complications of operative procedures. There is a growing understanding of the nature of the risks that cirrhotic patients experience, as well as more precise and objective tools to gauge the patients at risk for surgical complications. Surgical procedures that are common and high risk for patients with cirrhosis are cardiac surgery, cholecystectomy and hepatic resections, as well as other abdominal surgeries and orthopedic surgeries. The physicians who care for patients with cirrhosis who require a surgical procedure can apply an understanding of the type of surgery anticipated with knowledge of the severity of the patient's liver disease to predict those patients at risk for operative morbidity and mortality. A sound knowledge of the specific operative risks faced by patients with cirrhosis should prompt the clinician to take steps to prevent these complications.

A simple, noninvasively determined index predicting hepatic failure following liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A novel index, the serum aspartate aminotransferase activity/platelet count ratio index (APRI), has been identified as a biochemical surrogate for histological fibrogenesis and fibrosis in cirrhosis. We evaluated the ability of preoperative APRI to predict hepatic failure following liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

Potential preoperative risk factors for postoperative hepatic failure (hepatic coma with hyperbilirubinemia, four patients; intractable pleural effusion or ascites, 30 patients; and variceal bleeding, one patient) as well as APRI were evaluated in 366 patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Prognostic significance was determined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Hepatic failure developed postoperatively in 30 patients, causing death in four. APRI correlated with histological intensity of hepatitis activity and degree of hepatic fibrosis, and was significantly higher in patients who developed postoperative hepatic failure than in others without failure. Risk of postoperative hepatic failure increased as the serum albumin concentration and platelet count decreased and as indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min, aspartate and alanine aminotransferase activities, and APRI increased. Only APRI was an independent preoperative factor on multivariate analysis. Of the four patients who died of postoperative hepatic failure, three had an APRI of at least 10.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative APRI independently predicted hepatic failure following liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with an APRI of 10 or more have a high risk of postoperative hepatic failure.

Anatomic versus limited nonanatomic resection for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although anatomic liver resection is preferred when treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), evidence that it improves survival when compared with an adequate nonanatomic resection is lacking. The purpose of this study was to compare the survival impact of anatomic versus nonanatomic resection in patients with solitary HCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathologic data were available for 125 patients who underwent hepatectomy for a solitary HCC confined to 1 or 2 Couinaud's segments. These patients were divided into 2 groups based on the hepatectomy procedure: anatomic (n = 83) and nonanatomic (n = 42) resection.

RESULTS

No differences were detected either in the hepatic recurrence rates (P = .38) or in the overall survival rates (P = .34) between the anatomic group and the nonanatomic group. The hepatectomy procedure (anatomic vs nonanatomic resection) did not affect survival in either univariate (P = 0.34) or multivariate analysis (relative risk, 1.574; P = .22). The proportion of patients who survived after recurrence was greater in the nonanatomic (15/42) than the anatomic group (13/83; P = .049), and the median survival time after recurrence was greater in patients who underwent nonanatomic resection (991 days; range, 131-4073 days) than in patients with anatomic resection (310 days; range, 48-1887 days; P = .045).

CONCLUSIONS

No superiority was seen in survival when HCC was treated by anatomic resection. Maintaining adequate liver function regardless of whether the resection is anatomic or not may be of greater importance.

Systematic hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma in Korea

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Systematic hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a widely preferred modality, but evidence concerning its benefits is lacking. The aim of this study was to document hepatic resection for small HCC in Korea, and to determine whether patient survival or the pattern of tumor recurrence was influenced by the methods used.

METHODS

Ten major hospitals that perform hepatectomy for HCC in Korea were surveyed for surgeons' opinions concerning systematic hepatectomy and current trends in hepatic resection for small HCC. An analysis was also performed of 119 patients who underwent curative hepatectomy for small HCC (size < 5 cm) between January 2000 and December 2002 at Seoul National University Hospital. Seventy-four of these 119 patients underwent anatomical resection (AR) and 45 had a non-anatomical resection (NAR). Recurrence-free survival, recurrence pattern, overall survival rates, and the risk factors for recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the survey, eight of ten surgeons preferred systematic hepatectomy and considered it to aid prognosis. No significant difference was found between the AR and NAR groups in terms of the clinicopathologic findings, except that the presence of underlying hepatic cirrhosis was more prevalent in the NAR group. The postoperative morbidity rate was higher in the NAR group (33.3% vs 27.0%), but this difference was not statistically significant. The respective 1- and 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were 78.1% and 49.7% in the AR group, and 68.9% and 46.5% in the NAR group (P > 0.05). The corresponding 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 88.8% and 80.8% in the AR group and 91.0% and 71.4% in the NAR group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although systematic hepatectomy seems to be superior to non-anatomical hepatectomy from the oncological and anatomical aspects, this superiority is not reflected by the recurrence patterns or the survival and recurrence rates of the two procedures. Postoperative recurrence appears, rather, to be related to the underlying liver condition.

Correlation between preoperative serum concentration of type IV collagen 7s domain and hepatic failure following resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the predictive value of the preoperative serum concentration of type IV collagen 7s domain (7s collagen) for postoperative hepatic failure in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Clear and reliable criteria for predicting hepatic failure after liver resection are needed. The serum 7s collagen concentration correlates with the histologic degree of active hepatitis and hepatic fibrosis and may predict the regenerative potential of the liver.

METHODS

Potential risk factors for postoperative hepatic failure, including the serum 7s collagen concentration, were evaluated in 251 patients who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Prognostic significance was determined by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Hepatic failure developed postoperatively in 25 patients, 4 of whom died. The serum 7s collagen concentration correlated with the histologic degree of hepatitis activity and hepatic fibrosis. The serum 7s collagen concentration was a risk factor for postoperative hepatic failure by univariate analysis and was the only risk factor on multivariate analysis. No patient with a serum 7s collagen concentration <12 ng/mL died of postoperative hepatic failure, and all 4 patients who died had a serum 7s collagen concentration >or=12 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

The preoperative serum 7s collagen concentration correlated independently with hepatic failure following liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients whose serum 7s collagen is >or=12 ng/mL are poor candidates for hepatic resection.

Results of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma invading major portal and/or hepatic veins

Nonsurgical therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has yielded poor long-term survival. This study evaluates the effects of surgical treatments for patients with HCC invading major portal and/or hepatic veins. The surgical results of 112 patients with HCC invading major portal and/or hepatic veins who underwent hepatic resection between 1985 and 2001 were studied to evaluate the feasibility of hepatic resection as a local treatment.

Results of resections for hepatocellular carcinoma in a new hepatobiliary unit

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth commonest cancer in Singapore. Surgical resection offers the only chance of "cure". Resection tends to be difficult in HCC because of late presentation and concomitant liver cirrhosis. Specialized units with higher volume of operations are known to produce better results. The present review aims to evaluate early results with HCC resection and discuss the correlation between various tumour prognostic factors and the outcome.

METHODS

The records of 81 consecutive hepatic resections for HCC in the hepatobiliary unit of the Department of General Surgery at the Singapore General Hospital from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 1998 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 56.0 +/- 15.4 years. There were more men (M:F: 72:9) and Chinese patients (75 Chinese patients (92.6%); four Malay patients (4.9%); two Indian patients (2.5%)) affected by the disease. Hepatitis B and C carrier status were present in 67.1% (n = 51) and 3.9% (n = 1) of the patients, respectively. Forty-two patients (53.2%) had underlying liver cirrhosis. Twenty-eight patients (34.6%) underwent major hepatectomy and 53 (65.4%) underwent minor hepatectomies. Perioperative mortality was 4.9% (n = 4). The morbidity rate following hepatic resections was 28.4% (n = 23). The median follow up was 21 months (range: 1-52 months). The median survival was 43 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 34.6-51.4 months) after surgery and median time to recurrence was 9.6 months (range: 2-32 months). Overall survival was 79% and 59% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Disease-free survival was 59% and 30% at 1 and 3 years, respectively. Advance pathological tumour, nodes, metastases (TNM) stage (III and IV), and presence of adjacent organ involvement were risk factors for early recurrence. Advance pathological TNM stage (III and IV) and blood loss of more than 2 L were poor prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The results of hepatectomies for HCC in the newly established unit at Singapore General Hospital have been shown to be comparable to other established specialized hepatobiliary units with similar perioperative mortality and morbidity rates.

Perioperative safety and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with impaired liver function

BACKGROUND

The benefits of liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with concomitant impaired liver function were often considered questionable because of poor postoperative prognosis. This study will clarify whether an acceptable operative risk exists and whether limited resection will compromise the outcomes of these patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Between July 1991 and December 1996, a total of 168 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomies were enrolled and divided into normal (group A) and impaired (group B) liver function groups according to the value of indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes. Clinical features, surgical related features, pathologic features, and disease-free and overall survivals were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Operative morbidity and mortality in group A were 27.3% and 1.6%, and in group B were 40.0% and 2.5%, respectively (p = 0.129 and 0.506). Disease-free survival and overall survival at 5 years in group A were 43.2% and 59.6%, respectively, and in group B they were 30.6% and 56.8%, respectively (p = 0.607 and 0.378).

CONCLUSIONS

Limited liver resection is safe and provides favorable prognosis in HCC patients with concomitant impaired liver function.

Significance of resection margin in hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A critical reappraisal

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the influence of the width and histologic involvement of the resection margin on postoperative recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The significance of the resection margin in hepatectomy for HCC remains controversial. A precise evaluation of the effects of the width and histologic involvement of the resection margin on postoperative recurrence is required to clarify the issue.

METHODS

Two hundred eighty-eight patients with macroscopically complete resection of HCC were divided into groups with narrow (<1 cm) or wide (>/=1 cm) resection margins. The two groups were compared for postoperative recurrence rate and pattern of recurrence. A further analysis was performed to investigate the effects of histologic involvement of the resection margin on postoperative recurrence.

RESULTS

Recurrence rates were similar between 150 patients with a narrow margin and 138 patients with a wide margin; the groups were comparable in other clinicopathologic variables. Most recurrent tumors occurred in the liver remnant at a segment distant from the resection margin or at multiple segments. Thirty-four patients had margin involved histologically by microscopic invasion from the main tumor (n = 13), venous tumor thrombi (n = 13), or microsatellites separate from the main tumor (n = 8). These patients had significantly higher recurrence rates than those with a histologically clear margin. However, a positive histologic margin was not a significant risk factor for recurrence by multivariate analysis. Tumor stage and perioperative transfusion were the only independent risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

The width of the resection margin did not influence the postoperative recurrence rates after hepatectomy for HCC. A positive histologic margin was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative recurrence, but in most patients this was related to the underlying venous invasion or microsatellites. Most intrahepatic recurrences were considered to arise from intrahepatic metastasis by means of venous dissemination, which a wide resection margin could not prevent.

Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients: longterm results of a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients remains controversial because of a high reported recurrence rate. To assess the longterm results of resection, 37 patients included in a prospective study were followed for more than 5 years, with special interest in early detection of recurrence.

STUDY DESIGN

Resection was performed from 1986 to 1991 with the goal of sparing the functional liver parenchyma. The mean tumor diameter was 5.3 +/- 2.6 cm (range 2 to 11 cm). Nineteen patients had tumors smaller than 5 cm. No additional perioperative therapy was performed.

RESULTS

Evidence of intrahepatic recurrence was demonstrated in 26 of the 33 patients surviving the operation. Eight recurrences (31%) were diagnosed from the third to the fifth postoperative years. The recurrence-free survival rates at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years were 68%, 40%, 26%, 13%, and 9%, respectively. Only 2 patients (7%) were alive and free of recurrence at 5 years. Some long survivals were observed after treatment of recurrence. The overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 35% and 24%, respectively. Tumor cell differentiation was the only significant prognostic factor for both recurrence and survival. Multifocal tumors were associated with a higher recurrence rate. Patients with good liver function had longer survivals that reached 38% in those with small solitary tumors. Study of the other dinicopathologic factors failed to demonstrate any prognostic value.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a few patients are alive and free of recurrence 5 years after resection. Some long survival can be observed after treatment. Assessment of prognostic factors remains difficult, but the best results of resection are obtained in patients with small solitary hepatocellular carcinoma function.

Surgical intervention for patients with stage IV-A hepatocellular carcinoma without lymph node metastasis: proposal as a standard therapy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of surgical treatments for patients with stage IV-A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without lymph node metastasis.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Nonsurgical therapy for highly advanced HCC patients has yielded poor long-term survival. Surgical intervention has been initiated in an effort to improve survival.

METHODS

The outcome of 150 patients who underwent hepatic resection was studied. Survival analysis was made by stratifying stage IV-A HCC patients into two groups-those with and those without involvement of a major branch of the portal or hepatic veins. Those with involvement were further divided into subgroups according to major vascular invasions.

RESULTS

Patients who had multiple tumors in more than one lobe without vascular invasion had a significantly better 5-year survival rate (20%) than those with vascular invasion (8%) (p < 0.01). The survival rate of patients with hepatic vein tumor thrombi (10%) was better than the rate for those with tumor thrombi in the inferior vena cava (0%), in whom no patients survived more than 2 years, although the survival rate for those with portal vein tumor thrombi in the first branch (11%) was no different from the rate for that in the portal trunk (4%). The operative mortality decreased from 14.3% in the first 6 years to 1.4% in the following 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical intervention for stage IV-A HCC patients brought longer survival rates for some patients. We recommend surgical intervention as an effective therapeutic modality for patients with advanced HCC.

Proposal of invasiveness score to predict recurrence and survival after curative hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most malignant human tumors and is associated with a high incidence of postoperative recurrence. There is no generally accepted definition for HCC invasiveness. Moreover, the predictive value of the pathologic factors that reflect HCC invasiveness was previously studied as separate events, with much controversy among different study groups. In this study, we proposed an invasiveness scoring system based on the relative importance of six criteria for HCC invasiveness: portal vein invasion, intrahepatic metastasis, hepatic vein invasion, serosal invasion, absence of tumor capsule, or presence of capsular invasion.

METHODS

A total of 137 patients (111 male and 26 female) who underwent curative hepatectomy for HCC were included. Scoring of the six pathologic parameters was based on the clinical significance of each parameter as a single predictor for recurrence after curative resection. According to our scoring system, the patients were divided into three groups: low invasive HCC group A with a total invasiveness score 0 to 1, moderately invasive group B with a score of 2 to 4, and highly invasive group C with a total score of 5 or greater (5 to 11 points).

RESULTS

Evaluation of the current scoring system showed a significant stepwise increase in the incidence of recurrence as the invasiveness score increased. Moreover, disease-free survival was significantly different among the three groups (log rank p < 0.0001). The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 8-year disease-free survival rates were 89%, 59%, 54%, and 54% in group A; 72%, 32%, 12%, and 10% in group B; and 54%, 19%, 7%, and 0 in group C, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the patients of groups B and C had a significantly worse prognosis compared with those of group A (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The current scoring system can classify HCCs into three invasive categories and predict more accurately recurrence and disease-free survival after curative hepatectomy compared with any single invasive parameter previously proposed. Moreover, this system can be used as a therapeutic guide during and after the surgical decision making.

Hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers: is it unjustified in impaired liver function?

BACKGROUND

Resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis and impaired liver function is usually unjustified because of higher surgical risks and poorer long-term prognosis.

METHODS

A retrospective comparison of the background and resectional results of patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma was carried out between those with preoperative indocyanine green 15-minute retention rate of 20% or greater (group A, impaired function group, n = 36) and those with indocyanine green 15-minute retention rate of 10% or less (group B, normal function group, n = 34).

RESULTS

The group A patients had significantly lower serum albumin level and higher serum bilirubin level, longer prothrombin time, higher incidence of associated esophageal varices, and poorer Child's classifications for cirrhosis. Although the tumor diameter in both groups was similar (A, 6.9 versus B, 7.1 cm; p = 0.94), the resected liver amount in group B was greater (227.4 versus 473.2 gm; p = 0.038) because of a greater extent of liver resection (p < 0.001) and a wider surgical margin (0.34 versus 1.85 cm; p < 0.0001). The amount of operative blood loss and blood transfusion, operative morbidity, and operative mortality were not different between the two groups. The pathologic characteristics and staging were also comparable. The 5-year disease-free and actuarial survival rates of groups A and B were 30.9% and 29.6% (p = 0.16) and 45.2% and 33.4% (p = 0.11), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

If the amount of resected nontumorous liver parenchyma could be reduced, resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in selected patients with cirrhosis and impaired liver function is still justified in spite of a narrow surgical margin.

Advances in hepatic resection and results for hepatocellular carcinoma

The mortality and morbidity of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have decreased in recent years because of the various advances in hepatic resection. Various improvements are evident in dissecting apparatus, liver hepatic inflow clamp, cold hepatic perfusion technique, intraoperative ultrasonography, accurate assessment of hepatic function, autologous blood transfusion, and so on. Five-year survival after hepatic resection for HCC was reported at 26-59% in Eastern as well as Western series. The prognostic factors were portal invasion, multiplicity, serum alpha-fetoprotein level, tumor size, associated cirrhosis, age, alcohol abuse, histologic classification, DNA ploidy, and surgical margin. Segmental or lobar hepatic resection brought about better survival, especially in stage I and II patients. Effective adjuvant therapy should improve the diagnosis.

Surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma and concomitant esophagogastric varices

Preventing a rupture of esophagogastric varices (EGV) is very important in aggressively treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhotic patients. We therefore performed simultaneous partial hepatic resection and direct interruption procedure on nine patients with HCC and concomitant EGV. Patients were selected on the basis of their stages of HCC and hepatic functional reserve. Postoperative hospital courses of all patients were uneventful. Six patients had recurrence of HCC and received non-surgical anti-tumor treatments. Only one patient had upper gastrointestinal bleeding at 18 months after operation, and the other eight patients have had no episodes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding during the follow-up period. The 5-year survival rate of these patients was 48%. This operative procedure is quite effective and is one of the treatments of choice for patients with less advanced HCC and concomitant risk of EGV.