The first year with a J-pouch. A prospective evaluation

Functional outcomes of transanal versus transabdominal restorative proctectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis-a monocentric retrospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) ensures satisfactory gastro-intestinal function and quality of life (QoL) in patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). The transanal approach to proctectomy and IPAA (Ta-IPAA) has been developed to address the technical shortfalls of the traditional transabdominal approach (Tabd-IPAA). Ta-IPAA has proven to be safe but there is lack of reported functional outcomes. Aim of this study is to compare functional outcomes and QoL after Ta- or Tabd-IPAA for UC.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of consecutive UC patients who underwent IPAA between 2011 and 2017, operated according to a modified 2- or 3-stage approach. Close rectal dissection was performed in Ta-IPAA as opposed to total mesorectal excision in Tabd-IPAA. A propensity score weighting was performed. Functional outcomes were assessed using the pouch functional score (PFS) and the Öresland score (OS). The global quality of life scale (GQOL) was used for patients' perspective on QoL. Follow-up was scheduled at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, postoperatively.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight patients were included: 38 patients had Ta-IPAA. At 12 months follow-up, mean OS and PFS were 4.6 (CI 3.2-6.0) vs 6.2 (CI 5.0-7.3), p = 0.025 and 6.1 (CI 3.5-8.8) vs 7.4 (CI 5.4-9.5), p = 0.32, for Ta and Tabd-IPAA, respectively. Mean GQOL for Ta-IPAA was 82.5 (CI 74.8-90.1) vs 75.5 (69.4-81.7) for Tabd-IPAA (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

At 12 months postoperatively, pouch function and QoL of Ta-IPAA are probably as good as those of Tabd-IPAA. Limitations include retrospectivity, differences in the surgical technique, and lack of validated scores for QoL.

Incidence and subsequent impact of pelvic abscess after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis

PURPOSE

This study was designed to measure the impact of pelvic abscess on eventual pouch failure and functional outcome after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The outcome of 1,508 patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis at the Mayo Clinic was determined from a central patient registry, data were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients developed a pelvic abscess as a complication of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Pouch failure occurred in 19 (26 percent). Forty-eight patients (55 percent) required transabdominal salvage surgery, 6 (8 percent) underwent local surgery, and the remaining 27 (37 percent) were treated nonsurgically. Wound infection was more common in patients who experienced pelvic abscess. The majority of pouch failures secondary to pelvic abscess formation occurred within two years of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Daytime incontinence, the use of a protective pad, and the need for constipating or bulking medication were significantly more common among patients who had an abscess but kept their reservoir. Ability to perform work and domestic activities and to undertake recreational activities were significantly more restricted among these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pouch failure occurs in one-fourth of patients who retain their pouch despite pelvic abscess after ileal pouch-anal anasto mosis. Among patients who retain their pouch despite postoperative pelvic abscess, functional outcome and quality of life are significantly poorer than in patients in whom no sepsis occurred.

J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients

AIM

The purpose of the study was to determine the risk of postoperative complications and the functional outcome after a hand-sewn ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis using a single J-shaped pouch design.

METHODS

Preoperative function, operative morbidity and long-term functional outcome were assessed prospectively in 1310 patients who underwent IPAA between 1981 and 1994 for ulcerative colitis.

RESULTS

Three patients died after operation. Postoperative pelvic sepsis rates decreased from 7 per cent in 1981-1985 to 3 per cent in 1991-1994 (P = 0.02). After mean follow-up of 6.5 (range 2-15) years, the mean number of stools was 5 per day and 1 per night. Frequent daytime and nighttime incontinence occurred in 7 and 12 per cent of patients respectively, and did not change over a 10-year period. The cumulative probability of suffering at least one episode of 'clinical' pouchitis was 18 and 48 per cent at 1 and 10 years and the cumulative probability of pouch failure at 1 and 10 years was 2 and 9 per cent respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that increased experience decreases the risk of pouch-related complications and that with time the functional results remain stable, but the failure rate increases.

Social and sexual function following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

PURPOSE

Patients who undergo surgery for ulcerative colitis are usually young and active. When surgery becomes necessary, their future social and sexual function is of major concern. This study was performed to be able to give more detailed information of what is to be expected.

METHODS

Forty-nine consecutive patients (26 men and 23 women) who underwent ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis between November 1983 and September 1986 in the authors' institution were personally interviewed regarding details of their preoperative and postoperative social and sexual functions.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight percent had reduced capacity to work preoperatively compared with 6 percent postoperatively. Thirty-one percent resumed work in the period with diverting ileostomy. Leisure time activities were reduced in 47 percent preoperatively, whereas 6 percent had limitations postoperatively. In 35 percent of women, frequency of intercourse was increased postoperatively, and none reported a decreased frequency. None of the women who were able to achieve orgasm preoperatively reported a postoperative disturbance of this ability, and 16 percent experienced an increased quality of orgasm. Postoperatively none reported dyspareunia, vaginal discharge, or changes in their menstrual cycle. Frequency of intercourse and ability to achieve orgasm remained unchanged for the majority of men; however, one developed erectile dysfunction, and one complained of retrograde ejaculation. Sexual activity in men was less affected by the presence of an ileostomy, and 69 percent had intercourse in the period with ileostomy compared with 30 percent of women. None of the patients complained of anal pain, soiling, or fecal leakage during intercourse, but one women reported some discomfort from the pouch during intercourse. None of the patients wanted to return to a life with an ileostomy.

CONCLUSION

The social and sexual function, quality of life, after ileal J-pouch anastomosis is improved when compared with the period with ulcerative colitis and the time with diverting ileostomy. In men, however, a frequency of sexual dysfunction similar to what is seen after proctectomy for benign diseases should be underlined.

Attempts to aid the adaptation of pelvic pouch before temporary ileostomy closure

Most patients experience a high stool frequency immediately following the closure of the temporary ileostomy after total colectomy and ileoanal pouch reconstruction. Adaptation occurs within the ensuing weeks to reach a plateau in about three months. Increasing volumes of liquid nutrients were injected, twice daily for two months, into the pelvic pouch through a mucous ileal fistula proximal to the pouch before closing the temporary ileostomy. With this method the number of evacuations per 24 hours was significantly reduced during the first few weeks following the reestablishment of intestinal continuity, compared with a control group (average, 8.5 vs. 18.2, respectively). Patients also had better continence and less urgency to defecate. We suggest this technique in patients undergoing pelvic ileal reconstruction with temporary ileostomy.