Stress fibers in the mesenteric mesothelial cells of the large intestine of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana

Role of heat shock protein 70 in induction of stress fiber formation in rat arterial endothelial cells in response to stretch stress

We investigated the mechanism by which endothelial cells (ECs) resist various forms of physical stress using an experimental system consisting of rat arterial EC sheets. Formation of actin stress fibers (SFs) and expression of endothelial heat-shock stress proteins (HSPs) in response to mechanical stretch stress were assessed by immunofluorescence microscopy. Stretch stimulation increased expression of HSPs 25 and 70, but not that of HSP 90. Treatment with SB203580, a p38 MAP kinase inhibitor that acts upstream of the HSP 25 activation cascade, or with geldanamycin, an inhibitor of HSP 90, had no effect on the SF formation response to mechanical stretch stress. In contrast, treatment with quercetin, an HSP 70 inhibitor, inhibited both upregulation of endothelial HSP 70 and formation of SFs in response to tensile stress. In addition, treatment of stretched ECs with cytochalasin D, which disrupts SF formation, did not adversely affect stretch-induced upregulation of endothelial HSP 70. Our data suggest that endothelial HSP 70 plays an important role in inducing SF formation in response to tensile stress.

Role of marginal stress fibers formed in the rat vascular endothelial cells

Fluorescence cytochemistry using en face preparations of rat vascular endothelial cells (ECs) revealed the localization of actin, fibronectin (FN) and fibronectin receptor (FNR) along not only central stress fibers (SFs) but also the cell margins. Electron microscopy showed very close proximity between the topographical distribution of intracellular microfilament bundles and that of subendothelial FN in the EC margins. Therefore, these basal and marginal actin cables may be comparable to the well-established central SFs present in ECs. Formation of the central SFs was induced in ECs or mesothelial cells in response to tension, by which their cellular integrity seems to be effectively maintained. However, even when central SF formation was inhibited by cytochalasin D, the ECs with marginal SFs showed high resistance to mechanical tension, whereas mesenteric mesothelial cells having no such fibers easily lost their integrity. Thus, together with central SFs, the marginal SFs characteristic of rat vascular ECs may play an essential role in strengthening cell-matrix adhesion.

Expression of stress fibers in bullfrog mesothelial cells in response to tension

The relationship between stress fibers and tension in mesothelial cells of the bullfrog small intestine was examined by fluorescence cytochemistry using en face mesothelial cell preparations. In nontreated controls, actin revealed by rhodamine-phalloidin staining was localized only along the margins of the mesothelial cells. On the other hand, many stress fibers were formed in the mesothelial cells within 5-7 min after stretching of the intestinal wall in a given direction. The orientation of stress fibers within the cells was coincident with the direction of the tension applied. These cytoplasmic fibers disappeared almost completely from the mesothelial cells within 30 min after the release of tension. According to a difference in the intensity of tension necessary for stress fiber expression, the intestinal mesothelial cells were classified into two groups. Furthermore, cells containing stress fibers in each group showed a rapid increase in number once a given value of tension was applied. The present results indicate that the mesothelial cells of bullfrog small intestine may develop stress fibers to counteract tension exerted on the intestinal wall. Such stress fibers may serve to maintain cellular integrity by strengthening the cellular attachment to subepithelial tissue.