Intermediate filaments reminiscent of immature cells expressed by goldfish (Carassius auratus) astrocytes and oligodendrocytes in vitro

Immunochemical and molecular characterization of a novel cell line derived from the brain of Trachinotus blochii (Teleostei, Perciformes): A fish cell line with oligodendrocyte progenitor cell and tanycyte characteristics

Ependymal radial glial cells, also called tanycytes, are the predominant glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)- and vimentin (VIM)-expressing cells in fish ependyma. Radial glial cells have been proposed to be neural stem cells but their molecular expression is not well understood. Previous studies revealed that fish neural progenitor and neural stem cells have A2B5, a marker for oligodendrocyte progenitor cells (OPCs). In this study, an A2B5(+) cell line, SPB, was isolated from the brain of the teleost Trachinotus blochii and characterized. SPB cells usually grew as polygonal epithelial cells, but at high density, long processes were commonly observed. Using immunocytochemistry, SPB cells were shown to exhibit oligodendrocyte markers such as galactocerebroside and Olig2, and radial glial cell markers such as brain lipid-binding protein, GFAP, Sox2, and VIM. SPB cells were also observed to have DARPP-32, a marker for tanycytes in mammals, and primary cilia. RT-PCR additionally revealed expression of bone morphogenetic protein 4, connexin35, Noggin2, and proteolipid protein in SPB cells. Results of this study suggest that SPB cells are OPCs that can display tanycyte characteristics. Fish tanycytes can be neural stem cells suggesting that SPB cells are neural stem cells. SPB is the first fish cell line showing primary cilia and markers for both OPCs and tanycytes.

S-100-positive glial cells are involved in the regeneration of the visual pathway of teleosts

Glial cells in the normal and regenerating visual pathways of Tinca tinca (Cyprinid, Teleost) were studied by labelling with anti-S-100 antibody. In normal fish, S-100-positive bipolar cells were found in the optic nerve, optic tract, and in the diencephalic visual pathways. After crushing the left optic nerve, the distribution and the number of S-100-immunoreactive cells were modified. In the injured nerve, 7 to 15 days after crushing no immunoreactive cell bodies were found in the crushed area, but a greater number of S-100-positive cells were found on both sides of the injured area. Sixty days after crushing, positive cells penetrating the crushed area were observed; the normal pattern was almost restored 200 days after crushing. In the diencephalon, 25 days after crushing, the number of S-100-positive cells increased remarkably and the most intense immunostaining of glial processes was observed 60 days after crushing. The density of S-100-labelled cells decreased after 4 months postcrushing. However, in the optic tectum no changes were observed. The increase of glial cells in the lesioned visual pathway suggests that they could play an important role in axonal regeneration after crushing.

Neural cells from dogfish embryos express the same subtype-specific antigens as mammalian neural cells in vivo and in vitro

Neural cells are classically identified in vivo and in vitro by a combination of morphological and immunocytochemical criteria. Here, we demonstrate that antibodies used to identify mammalian oligodendrocytes, neurons, and astrocytes recognize these cell types in the developing spiny dogfish central nervous system and in cultures prepared from this tissue. Oligodendrocyte-lineage-specific antibodies O1, O4, and R-mAb labeled cells in the 9 cm dogfish brain stem's medial longitudinal fascicle (MLF) and in areas lateral to it. Process-bearing cells, cultured from the dogfish brain stem, were also labeled with these antibodies. An anti-lamprey neurofilament antibody (LCM), which recognized 60 and 150 kDa proteins in dogfish brain stem homogenates, labeled axons and neurons in the brain stem and axons in the cerebellum of the dogfish embryo. It also labeled cell bodies and/or processes of some cultured cerebellar cells. An anti-bovine glial fibrillary acidic protein antibody, which recognized 42-44 kDa protein(s) in dogfish brain stem homogenates, labeled astrocyte-like processes in the brain stem and cerebellum of the dogfish embryo and numerous large and small flat cells in the cerebellar cultures. These results demonstrate that dogfish oligodendrocytes, neurons, and astrocytes express antigens that are conserved in mammalian neural cells. The ability to culture and identify neural cell types from cartilaginous fish sets the stage for studies to determine if proliferation, migration, and differentiation of these cell types are regulated in a similar fashion to mammalian cells.

Glial cell types, lineages, and response to injury in rat and fish: implications for regeneration

Axons of the mammalian central nervous system do not regenerate spontaneously after axonal injury, unlike the central nervous system axons of fish and amphibians and the peripheral nervous system of mammals, which possess a good regenerative ability (Grafstein: The Retina: A Model for Cell Biology Studies, Part II, 1986; Kiernan: Biol Rev 54:155-197, 1979; Murray: J Comp Neurol 168:175-196, 1976; Ramón y Cajal: Degeneration and Regeneration of the Nervous System, 1928; Reier and Webster: J Neurocytol 3:591-618, 1974; Sperry: Physiol Zool 23:351-361, 1948). It was previously believed that intrinsic differences between the central nervous system neurons of mammals and fish account for their differences in regenerative ability. The past decade, however, has seen an accumulation of evidence, indicating that mammalian central nervous system neurons are able to regenerate injured axons, at least to some extent. This was first demonstrated by Aguayo and colleagues (David and Aguayo: Science 214:931-933, 1981; Kierstead et al: Science 246:255-257, 1989), who showed that injured mammalian central nervous system axons can grow for a considerable distance into an autograft of a peripheral nerve. It was also demonstrated that injured rabbit optic axons can regenerate into their own environment (i.e., into the distal part of the injured optic nerve), if the injured nerve is treated so as to make it conducive for growth (Lavie et al: J Comp Neurol 298:293-314, 1990; Eitan et al: Science 264:1764-1768, 1994).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)