Alleviation of type I restriction in adenine methylase (dam) mutants of Escherichia coli

DNA Methylation

The DNA of Escherichia coli contains 19,120 6-methyladenines and 12,045 5-methylcytosines in addition to the four regular bases, and these are formed by the postreplicative action of three DNA methyltransferases. The majority of the methylated bases are formed by the Dam and Dcm methyltransferases encoded by the dam (DNA adenine methyltransferase) and dcm (DNA cytosine methyltransferase) genes. Although not essential, Dam methylation is important for strand discrimination during the repair of replication errors, controlling the frequency of initiation of chromosome replication at oriC, and the regulation of transcription initiation at promoters containing GATC sequences. In contrast, there is no known function for Dcm methylation, although Dcm recognition sites constitute sequence motifs for Very Short Patch repair of T/G base mismatches. In certain bacteria (e.g., Vibrio cholerae, Caulobacter crescentus) adenine methylation is essential, and, in C. crescentus, it is important for temporal gene expression, which, in turn, is required for coordinating chromosome initiation, replication, and division. In practical terms, Dam and Dcm methylation can inhibit restriction enzyme cleavage, decrease transformation frequency in certain bacteria, and decrease the stability of short direct repeats and are necessary for site-directed mutagenesis and to probe eukaryotic structure and function.

ClpXP protease targets long-lived DNA translocation states of a helicase-like motor to cause restriction alleviation

We investigated how Escherichia coli ClpXP targets the helicase-nuclease (HsdR) subunit of the bacterial Type I restriction–modification enzyme EcoKI during restriction alleviation (RA). RA is a temporary reduction in endonuclease activity that occurs when Type I enzymes bind unmodified recognition sites on the host genome. These conditions arise upon acquisition of a new system by a naïve host, upon generation of new sites by genome rearrangement/mutation or during homologous recombination between hemimethylated DNA. Using recombinant DNA and proteins in vitro, we demonstrate that ClpXP targets EcoKI HsdR during dsDNA translocation on circular DNA but not on linear DNA. Protein roadblocks did not activate HsdR proteolysis. We suggest that DNA translocation lifetime, which is elevated on circular DNA relative to linear DNA, is important to RA. To identify the ClpX degradation tag (degron) in HsdR, we used bioinformatics and biochemical assays to design N- and C-terminal mutations that were analysed in vitro and in vivo. None of the mutants produced a phenotype consistent with loss of the degron, suggesting an as-yet-unidentified recognition pathway. We note that an EcoKI nuclease mutant still produces cell death in a clpx⁻ strain, consistent with DNA damage induced by unregulated motor activity.

Nuclear dualism

Nuclear dualism is a characteristic feature of the ciliated protozoa. Tetrahymena have two different nuclei in each cell. The larger, polyploid, somatic macronucleus (MAC) is the site of transcriptional activity in the vegetatively growing cell. The smaller, diploid micronucleus (MIC) is transcriptionally inactive in vegetative cells, but is transcriptionally active in mating cells and responsible for the genetic continuity during sexual reproduction. Although the MICs and MACs develop from mitotic products of a common progenitor and reside in a common cytoplasm, they are different from one another in almost every respect.

Conflicts targeting epigenetic systems and their resolution by cell death: novel concepts for methyl-specific and other restriction systems

Epigenetic modification of genomic DNA by methylation is important for defining the epigenome and the transcriptome in eukaryotes as well as in prokaryotes. In prokaryotes, the DNA methyltransferase genes often vary, are mobile, and are paired with the gene for a restriction enzyme. Decrease in a certain epigenetic methylation may lead to chromosome cleavage by the partner restriction enzyme, leading to eventual cell death. Thus, the pairing of a DNA methyltransferase and a restriction enzyme forces an epigenetic state to be maintained within the genome. Although restriction enzymes were originally discovered for their ability to attack invading DNAs, it may be understood because such DNAs show deviation from this epigenetic status. DNAs with epigenetic methylation, by a methyltransferase linked or unlinked with a restriction enzyme, can also be the target of DNases, such as McrBC of Escherichia coli, which was discovered because of its methyl-specific restriction. McrBC responds to specific genome methylation systems by killing the host bacterial cell through chromosome cleavage. Evolutionary and genomic analysis of McrBC homologues revealed their mobility and wide distribution in prokaryotes similar to restriction–modification systems. These findings support the hypothesis that this family of methyl-specific DNases evolved as mobile elements competing with specific genome methylation systems through host killing. These restriction systems clearly demonstrate the presence of conflicts between epigenetic systems.

DNA Methylation

The DNA of Escherichia coli contains 19,120 6-methyladenines and 12,045 5-methylcytosines in addition to the four regular bases, and these are formed by the postreplicative action of three DNA methyltransferases. The majority of the methylated bases are formed by the Dam and Dcmmethyltransferases encoded by the dam (DNA adenine methyltransferase) and dcm (DNA cytosine methyltransferase) genes. Although not essential, Dam methylation is important for strand discrimination during repair of replication errors, controlling the frequency of initiation of chromosome replication at oriC, and regulation of transcription initiation at promoters containing GATC sequences. In contrast, there is no known function for Dcm methylation, although Dcm recognition sites constitute sequence motifs for Very Short Patch repair of T/G base mismatches. In certain bacteria (e.g., Vibrio cholera and Caulobactercrescentus) adenine methylation is essential, and in C.crescentus it is important for temporal gene expression which, in turn, is required for coordination of chromosome initiation, replication, and division. In practical terms, Dam and Dcm methylation can inhibit restriction enzyme cleavage,decrease transformation frequency in certain bacteria,and decrease the stability of short direct repeats andare necessary for site-directed mutagenesis and to probe eukaryotic structure and function.

Cleavage of a model DNA replication fork by a Type I restriction endonuclease

Cleavage of a DNA replication fork leads to fork restoration by recombination repair. In prokaryote cells carrying restriction-modification systems, fork passage reduces genome methylation by the modification enzyme and exposes the chromosome to attack by the restriction enzyme. Various observations have suggested a relationship between the fork and Type I restriction enzymes, which cleave DNA at a distance from a recognition sequence. Here, we demonstrate that a Type I restriction enzyme preparation cleaves a model replication fork at its branch. The enzyme probably tracks along the DNA from an unmethylated recognition site on the daughter DNA and cuts the fork upon encountering the branch point. Our finding suggests that these restriction-modification systems contribute to genome maintenance through cell death and indicates that DNA replication fork cleavage represents a critical point in genome maintenance to choose between the restoration pathway and the destruction pathway.

Roles of PriA protein and double-strand DNA break repair functions in UV-induced restriction alleviation in Escherichia coli

It has been widely considered that DNA modification protects the chromosome of bacteria E. coli K-12 against their own restriction-modification systems. Chromosomal DNA is protected from degradation by methylation of target sequences. However, when unmethylated target sequences are generated in the host chromosome, the endonuclease activity of the EcoKI restriction-modification enzyme is inactivated by the ClpXP protease and DNA is protected. This process is known as restriction alleviation (RA) and it can be induced by UV irradiation (UV-induced RA). It has been proposed that chromosomal unmethylated target sequences, a signal for the cell to protect its own DNA, can be generated by homologous recombination during the repair of damaged DNA. In this study, we wanted to further investigate the genetic requirements for recombination proteins involved in the generation of unmethylated target sequences. For this purpose, we monitored the alleviation of EcoKI restriction by measuring the survival of unmodified lambda in UV-irradiated cells. Our genetic analysis showed that UV-induced RA is dependent on the excision repair protein UvrA, the RecA-loading activity of the RecBCD enzyme, and the primosome assembly activity of the PriA helicase and is partially dependent on RecFOR proteins. On the basis of our results, we propose that unmethylated target sequences are generated at the D-loop by the strand exchange of two hemi-methylated duplex DNAs and subsequent initiation of DNA replication.

Type III restriction is alleviated by bacteriophage (RecE) homologous recombination function but enhanced by bacterial (RecBCD) function

Previous works have demonstrated that DNA breaks generated by restriction enzymes stimulate, and are repaired by, homologous recombination with an intact, homologous DNA region through the function of lambdoid bacteriophages lambda and Rac. In the present work, we examined the effect of bacteriophage functions, expressed in bacterial cells, on restriction of an infecting tester phage in a simple plaque formation assay. The efficiency of plaque formation on an Escherichia coli host carrying EcoRI, a type II restriction system, is not increased by the presence of Rac prophage-presumably because, under the single-infection conditions of the plaque assay, a broken phage DNA cannot find a homologue with which to recombine. To our surprise, however, we found that the efficiency of plaque formation in the presence of a type III restriction system, EcoP1 or EcoP15, is increased by the bacteriophage-mediated homologous recombination functions recE and recT of Rac prophage. This type III restriction alleviation does not depend on lar on Rac, unlike type I restriction alleviation. On the other hand, bacterial RecBCD-homologous recombination function enhances type III restriction. These results led us to hypothesize that the action of type III restriction enzymes takes place on replicated or replicating DNA in vivo and leaves daughter DNAs with breaks at nonallelic sites, that bacteriophage-mediated homologous recombination reconstitutes an intact DNA from them, and that RecBCD exonuclease blocks this repair by degradation from the restriction breaks.

Subunit assembly modulates the activities of the Type III restriction-modification enzyme PstII in vitro

We demonstrate that, like other Type III restriction endonuclease, PstII does not turnover such that a DNA substrate is only fully cleaved at a Res2Mod2-to-site ratio of approximately 1:1. However, unlike other Type III enzymes, the cleavage rate profiles varied with protein concentration: using 5 nM DNA and 25 nM PstII, approximately half of the DNA was cut at a fast rate while the remainder was cut 24 times more slowly; in comparison, with 100 nM PstII cleavage occurs at a single fast rate. The inclusion of the methyl donor S-adenosyl methionine does not alter the rates with 100 nM PstII but with 25 nM PstII the reaction stopped after completion of the initial fast cleavage phase owing to methylation. Concentration-dependent rates were also observed in methylation assays: at 100 nM PstII, a single slow rate was measured while at lower PstII concentrations both fast and slow rates were measured. We propose a model in which the intact Res2Mod2 complex favoured at high PstII concentrations is a fast endonuclease/slow methyltransferase while the various subassemblies which coexist at lower concentrations are fast methyltransferases. A potential role for disassembly in control of restriction activity in vivo is discussed.

The proteolytic control of restriction activity in Escherichia coli K-12

The endonuclease activity of EcoKI is regulated by the ClpXP-dependent degradation of the subunit that is essential for restriction, but not modification. We monitored proteolysis in mutants blocked at different steps in the restriction pathway. Mutations that prevent DNA translocation render EcoKI refractory to proteolysis, whereas those that permit DNA translocation, but block endonuclease activity, do not. Although proteolysis alleviates restriction in a mutant that lacks modification activity, some restriction activity remains; our evidence indicates residual EcoKI associated with the membrane fraction. ClpXP protects the bacterial chromosome, but little effect was detected on unmodified foreign DNA within the cytoplasm of a restriction-proficient cell. The molecular basis for the distinction between unmodified resident and foreign DNA remains to be determined.

Type I restriction systems: sophisticated molecular machines (a legacy of Bertani and Weigle)

Restriction enzymes are well known as reagents widely used by molecular biologists for genetic manipulation and analysis, but these reagents represent only one class (type II) of a wider range of enzymes that recognize specific nucleotide sequences in DNA molecules and detect the provenance of the DNA on the basis of specific modifications to their target sequence. Type I restriction and modification (R-M) systems are complex; a single multifunctional enzyme can respond to the modification state of its target sequence with the alternative activities of modification or restriction. In the absence of DNA modification, a type I R-M enzyme behaves like a molecular motor, translocating vast stretches of DNA towards itself before eventually breaking the DNA molecule. These sophisticated enzymes are the focus of this review, which will emphasize those aspects that give insights into more general problems of molecular and microbial biology. Current molecular experiments explore target recognition, intramolecular communication, and enzyme activities, including DNA translocation. Type I R-M systems are notable for their ability to evolve new specificities, even in laboratory cultures. This observation raises the important question of how bacteria protect their chromosomes from destruction by newly acquired restriction specifities. Recent experiments demonstrate proteolytic mechanisms by which cells avoid DNA breakage by a type I R-M system whenever their chromosomal DNA acquires unmodified target sequences. Finally, the review will reflect the present impact of genomic sequences on a field that has previously derived information almost exclusively from the analysis of bacteria commonly studied in the laboratory.

Regulation of endonuclease activity by proteolysis prevents breakage of unmodified bacterial chromosomes by type I restriction enzymes

ClpXP-dependent proteolysis has been implicated in the delayed detection of restriction activity after the acquisition of the genes (hsdR, hsdM, and hsdS) that specify EcoKI and EcoAI, representatives of two families of type I restriction and modification (R-M) systems. Modification, once established, has been assumed to provide adequate protection against a resident restriction system. However, unmodified targets may be generated in the DNA of an hsd(+) bacterium as the result of replication errors or recombination-dependent repair. We show that ClpXP-dependent regulation of the endonuclease activity enables bacteria that acquire unmodified chromosomal target sequences to survive. In such bacteria, HsdR, the polypeptide of the R-M complex essential for restriction but not modification, is degraded in the presence of ClpXP. A mutation that blocks only the modification activity of EcoKI, leaving the cell with approximately 600 unmodified targets, is not lethal provided that ClpXP is present. Our data support a model in which the HsdR component of a type I restriction endonuclease becomes a substrate for proteolysis after the endonuclease has bound to unmodified target sequences, but before completion of the pathway that would result in DNA breakage.

Position effect takes precedence over target sequence in determination of adenine methylation patterns in the nuclear genome of a eukaryote, Tetrahymena thermophila

Approximately 0.8% of the adenine residues in the macronuclear DNA of the ciliated protozoan Tetrahymena thermophila are modified to N 6-methyladenine. DNA methylation is site specific and the pattern of methylation is constant between clonal cell lines. In vivo, modification of adenine residues appears to occur exclusively in the sequence 5'-NAT-3', but no consensus sequence for modified sites has been found. In this study, DNA fragments containing a site that is uniformly methylated on the 50 copies of the macronuclear chromosome were cloned into the extrachromosomal rDNA. In the novel location on the rDNA minichromosome, the site was unmethylated. The result was the same whether the sequences were introduced in a methylated or unmethylated state and regardless of the orientation of the sequence with respect to the origin of DNA replication. The data show that sequence is insufficient to account for site-specific methylation in Tetrahymena and argue that other factors determine the pattern of DNA methylation.

Improved electro-transformation of highly DNA-restrictive corynebacteria with DNA extracted from starved Escherichia coli

Differences of up to 33 000-fold in electro-transformability of highly DNA restrictive corynebacteria are observed in the DNA of a shuttle plasmid extracted from Escherichia coli hosts propagated in different nutritional conditions. Growth of the host in minimal medium increases plasmid transformability, whereas growth on rich media decreases it. In the E. coli DH5 alpha host, the starvation-dependent increase DNA transformability is reverted by supplementing with methionine, an obligate 5-adenosyl-methionine (SAM) precursor. This suggests that an E. coli nutritionally modulated SAM-dependent DNA-methyltransferase may be involved in this phenomenon.

A motif conserved among the type I restriction-modification enzymes and antirestriction proteins: a possible basis for mechanism of action of plasmid-encoded antirestriction functions

Antirestriction proteins Ard encoded by some self-transmissible plasmids specifically inhibit restriction by members of all three families of type I restriction-modification (R-M) systems in E.coli. Recently, we have identified the amino acid region, 'antirestriction' domain, that is conserved within different plasmid and phage T7-encoded antirestriction proteins and may be involved in interaction with the type I R-M systems. In this paper we demonstrate that this amino acid sequence shares considerable similarity with a well-known conserved sequence (the Argos repeat) found in the DNA sequence specificity (S) polypeptides of type I systems. We suggest that the presence of these similar motifs in restriction and antirestriction proteins may give a structural basis for their interaction and that the antirestriction action of Ard proteins may be a result of the competition between the 'antirestriction' domains of Ard proteins and the similar conserved domains of the S subunits that are believed to play a role in the subunit assembly of type I R-M systems.

Response to UV damage by four Escherichia coli K-12 restriction systems

To understand the role of restriction in regulating gene flow in bacterial populations, we would like to understand the regulation of restriction enzyme activity. Several antirestriction (restriction alleviation) systems are known that reduce the activity of type I restriction enzymes like EcoKI in vivo. Most of these do not act on type II or type III enzymes, but little information is available for the unclassified modification-dependent systems, of which there are three in E. coli K-12. Of particular interest are two physiological controls on type I enzymes: EcoKI restriction is reduced 2 to 3 orders of magnitude following DNA damage, and a similar effect is seen constitutively in Dam- cells. We used the behavior of EcoKI as a control for testing the response to UV treatment of the three endogenous modification-dependent restriction systems of K-12, McrA, McrBC, and Mrr. Two of these were also tested for response to Dam status. We find that all four resident restriction systems show reduced activity following UV treatment, but not in a unified fashion; each response was genetically and physiologically distinct. Possible mechanisms are discussed.

Biology of DNA restriction

Our understanding of the evolution of DNA restriction and modification systems, the control of the expression of the structural genes for the enzymes, and the importance of DNA restriction in the cellular economy has advanced by leaps and bounds in recent years. This review documents these advances for the three major classes of classical restriction and modification systems, describes the discovery of a new class of restriction systems that specifically cut DNA carrying the modification signature of foreign cells, and deals with the mechanisms developed by phages to avoid the restriction systems of their hosts.

IncN plasmid pKM101 and IncI1 plasmid ColIb-P9 encode homologous antirestriction proteins in their leading regions

The IncN plasmid pKM101 (a derivative of R46), like the IncI1 plasmid ColIb-P9, carries a gene (ardA, for alleviation of restriction of DNA) encoding an antirestriction function. ardA was located about 4 kb from the origin of transfer, in the region transferred early during bacterial conjugation. The nucleotide sequence of ardA was determined, and an appropriate polypeptide with the predicted molecular weight of about 19,500 was identified in maxicells of Escherichia coli. Comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of the antirestriction proteins of the unrelated plasmids pKM101 and ColIb (ArdA and Ard, respectively) revealed that these proteins have about 60% identity. Like ColIb Ard, pKM101 ArdA specifically inhibits both the restriction and modification activities of five type I systems of E. coli tested and does not influence type III (EcoP1) restriction or the 5-methylcytosine-specific restriction systems McrA and McrB. However, in contrast to ColIb Ard, pKM101 ArdA is effective against the type II enzyme EcoRI. The Ard proteins are believed to overcome the host restriction barrier during bacterial conjugation. We have also identified two other genes of pKM101, ardR and ardK, which seem to control ardA activity and ardA-mediated lethality, respectively. Our findings suggest that ardR may serve as a genetic switch that determines whether the ardA-encoded antirestriction function is induced during mating.

Nucleotide sequence of the gene (ard) encoding the antirestriction protein of plasmid colIb-P9

The IncI1 plasmid ColIb-P9 was found to encode an antirestriction function. The relevant gene, ard (alleviation of restriction of DNA), maps about 5 kb from the origin of transfer, in the region transferred early during bacterial conjugation. Ard inhibits both restriction and modification by each of the four type I systems of Escherichia coli tested, but it had no effect on restriction by either EcoRI, a type II system, or EcoP1, a type III system. The nucleotide sequence of the ColIb ard gene was determined; the predicted molecular weight of the Ard polypeptide is 19,193. The proposed polypeptide chain contains an excess of 25 negatively charged amino acids, suggesting that its overall character is very acidic. Deletion analysis of the gene revealed that the Ard protein contained a distinct functional domain located in the COOH-terminal half of the polypeptide. We suggest that the biological role of the ColIb Ard protein is associated with overcoming host-controlled restriction during bacterial conjugation.

Different mechanisms for SOS induced alleviation of DNA restriction in Escherichia coli

The alleviation of DNA restriction during the SOS response in Escherichia coli has been further investigated. With the EcoK DNA restriction system UV irradiated wild-type cells show a 10(4)-fold increase in ability to plate non-modified lambda phage and a 3-4 fold increase in transformation by non-modified plasmid DNA. A role for the umuDC genes of E coli in the process of SOS-induced restriction alleviation was identified by showing that a umuC122::Tn5 mutant could alleviate EcoK restriction to only 5% that of wild-type levels. Although umuDC are better characterized for their pivotal role in SOS induced mutagenesis, it is demonstrated here that umu-dependent alleviation of EcoK restriction is a transient process in which umu-dependent mutagenesis plays little part. A second form of SOS induced alleviation of DNA restriction is described in this paper involving the McrA restriction system. The mcrA gene is shown to be encoded within a defective prophage called e14 situated at the 25 min region on the Escherichia coli genetic map. e14 is known to abortively excise from the chromosome after SOS induction and it is demonstrated in this report that mcrA is lost from the genome after SOS induction as part of e14. This results in co-ordinate decrease in the level of McrA restriction within a population of cells.

2-Aminopurine and 5-bromouracil induce alleviation of type I restriction in Escherichia coli: mismatches function as inducing signals?

The EcoK restriction of unmodified phage lambda is 1000-fold alleviated in Escherichia coli grown in the presence of base analogs 2-aminopurine (2AP) and 5-bromouracil (5BU). 2AP treatment of bacteria affects specifically the type I restriction systems (EcoA, EcoB, EcoD and EcoK) and does not influence type II (EcoRI) and type III (EcoP1) restriction. 2AP-induced alleviation of restriction occurs in bacteria which are deficient in the SOS response (recA and lexA) and mismatch repair (mutH, mutL and mutS) and can be distinguished from the alleviation of restriction observed in dam- strains. We suggest that mismatches induced by 2AP and 5BU may function as an inducing signal for the alleviation of restriction observed in the presence of base analogs.