A transcriptional terminator sequence in the prokaryotic transposable element IS1

The impact of insertion sequences on bacterial genome plasticity and adaptability

Transposable elements (TE), small mobile genetic elements unable to exist independently of the host genome, were initially believed to be exclusively deleterious genomic parasites. However, it is now clear that they play an important role as bacterial mutagenic agents, enabling the host to adapt to new environmental challenges and to colonize new niches. This review focuses on the impact of insertion sequences (IS), arguably the smallest TE, on bacterial genome plasticity and concomitant adaptability of phenotypic traits, including resistance to antibacterial agents, virulence, pathogenicity and catabolism. The direct consequence of IS transposition is the insertion of one DNA sequence into another. This event can result in gene inactivation as well as in modulation of neighbouring gene expression. The latter is usually mediated by de-repression or by the introduction of a complete or partial promoter located within the element. Furthermore, transcription and transposition of IS are affected by host factors and in some cases by environmental signals offering the host an adaptive strategy and promoting genetic variability to withstand the environmental challenges.

Novel miniature transposable elements in thermophilic Synechococcus strains and their impact on an environmental population

The genomes of the two closely related freshwater thermophilic cyanobacteria Synechococcus sp. strain JA-3-3Ab and Synechococcus sp. strain JA-2-3B'a(2-13) each host several families of insertion sequences (ISSoc families) at various copy numbers, resulting in an overall high abundance of insertion sequences in the genomes. In addition to full-length copies, a large number of internal deletion variants have been identified. ISSoc2 has two variants (ISSoc2∂-1 and ISSoc2∂-2) that are observed to have multiple near-exact copies. Comparison of environmental metagenomic sequences to the Synechococcus genomes reveals novel placement of copies of ISSoc2, ISSoc2∂-1, and ISSoc2∂-2. Thus, ISSoc2∂-1 and ISSoc2∂-2 appear to be active nonautonomous mobile elements derived by internal deletion from ISSoc2. Insertion sites interrupting genes that are likely critical for cell viability were detected; however, most insertions either were intergenic or were within genes of unknown function. Most novel insertions detected in the metagenome were rare, suggesting a stringent selective environment. Evidence for mobility of internal deletion variants of other insertion sequences in these isolates suggests that this is a general mechanism for the formation of miniature insertion sequences.

Analysis of insertion sequences in thermophilic cyanobacteria: exploring the mechanisms of establishing, maintaining, and withstanding high insertion sequence abundance

Insertion sequences (ISs) are simple mobile genetic elements capable of relocating within a genome. Through this transposition activity, they are known to create mutations which are mostly deleterious to the cell, although occasionally they are beneficial. Two closely related isolates of thermophilic Synechococcus species from hot spring microbial mats are known to harbor a large number of diverse ISs. To explore the mechanism of IS acquisition within natural populations and survival in the face of high IS abundance, we examined IS content and location in natural populations of Synechococcus by comparing metagenomic data to the genomes of fully sequenced cultured isolates. The observed IS distribution in the metagenome was equivalent to the distribution in the isolates, indicating that the cultured isolates are appropriate models for the environmental population. High sequence conservation between IS families shared between the two isolates suggests that ISs are able to move between individuals within populations and between species via lateral gene transfer, consistent with models for IS family accumulation. Most IS families show evidence of recent activity, and interruption of critical genes in some individuals was observed, demonstrating that transposition is an ongoing mutational force in the populations.

A new regulatory circuit in ribosomal protein operons: S2-mediated control of the rpsB-tsf expression in vivo

Autogenous regulation is a general strategy of balancing ribosomal protein synthesis in bacteria. Control mechanisms have been studied in detail for most of ribosomal protein operons, except for rpsB-tsf encoding essential r-protein S2 and elongation factor Ts, where even the promoter has remained unknown. By using single-copy translational fusions with the chromosomal lacZ gene and Western-blot analysis, we demonstrate here that S2 serves as a negative regulator of both rpsB and tsf expression in vivo, acting at a single target within the rpsB 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR). As determined by primer extension, transcription of the Escherichia coli rpsB-tsf operon starts 162 nucleotides upstream of the rpsB initiation codon at a single promoter TGTGGTATAAA belonging to the extended -10 promoter class. Both the promoter signature and the 5'-UTR structure of the rpsB gene appear to be highly conserved in gamma-proteobacteria. Deletion analysis of the rpsB 5'-UTR within rpsB'-'lacZ fusions has revealed that an operator region involved in the S2 autoregulation comprises conserved structural elements located upstream of the rpsB ribosome binding site. The S2-mediated autogenous control is impaired in rpsB mutants and, more surprisingly, in the rpsA mutant producing decreased amounts of truncated r-protein S1 (rpsAIS10), indicating that S2 might act as a repressor in cooperation with S1.

Insertion sequences

Insertion sequences (ISs) constitute an important component of most bacterial genomes. Over 500 individual ISs have been described in the literature to date, and many more are being discovered in the ongoing prokaryotic and eukaryotic genome-sequencing projects. The last 10 years have also seen some striking advances in our understanding of the transposition process itself. Not least of these has been the development of various in vitro transposition systems for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic elements and, for several of these, a detailed understanding of the transposition process at the chemical level. This review presents a general overview of the organization and function of insertion sequences of eubacterial, archaebacterial, and eukaryotic origins with particular emphasis on bacterial elements and on different aspects of the transposition mechanism. It also attempts to provide a framework for classification of these elements by assigning them to various families or groups. A total of 443 members of the collection have been grouped in 17 families based on combinations of the following criteria: (i) similarities in genetic organization (arrangement of open reading frames); (ii) marked identities or similarities in the enzymes which mediate the transposition reactions, the recombinases/transposases (Tpases); (iii) similar features of their ends (terminal IRs); and (iv) fate of the nucleotide sequence of their target sites (generation of a direct target duplication of determined length). A brief description of the mechanism(s) involved in the mobility of individual ISs in each family and of the structure-function relationships of the individual Tpases is included where available.

Translational frameshifting in the control of transposition in bacteria

The expression of an increasing number of genes of both prokaryotic and eukaryotic origin has been shown to be regulated at the translational level by programmed (sequence-specific) ribosomal frameshifting. Among these are the bacterial insertion sequences IS1 and two members of the widely distributed IS3-family, IS150 and IS911. Frameshifting provides a means of specifying several proteins with different functions using a minimum of genetic information. In this review, we survey present understanding of the way in which frameshifting is integrated into the overall control of transposition activity in these elements.

DNA sequences required for translational frameshifting in production of the transposase encoded by IS1

The transposase encoded by insertion sequence IS1 is produced from two out-of-phase reading frames (insA and B'-insB) by translational frameshifting, which occurs within a run of six adenines in the -1 direction. To determine the sequence essential for frameshifting, substitution mutations were introduced within the region containing the run of adenines and were examined for their effects on frameshifting. Substitutions at each of three (2nd, 3rd and 4th) adenine residues in the run, which are recognized by tRNA(Lys) reading insA, caused serious defects in frameshifting, showing that the three adenine residues are essential for frameshifting. The effects of substitution mutations introduced in the region flanking the run of adenines and in the secondary structures located downstream were, however, small, indicating that such a region and structures are not essential for frameshifting. Deletion of a region containing the termination codon of insA caused a decrease in beta-galactosidase activity specified by the lacZ fusion plasmid in frame with B'-insB. Exchange of the wild-type termination codon of insA for a different one or introduction of an additional termination codon in the region upstream of the native termination codon caused an increase in beta-galactosidase activity, indicating that the termination codon in insA affects the efficiency of frameshifting.

Regulation of IS1 transposition by the insA gene product

The IS1 element contains two adjacent genes called insA and insB, both required for IS1 transposition and IS1-mediated plasmid cointegration. These two genes are transcribed polycistronically from the promoter in the left terminal inverted repeat of IS1 (insL). We constructed overexpression systems of these genes with the tac promoter, which are regulated by an exogenous inducer, isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). Then we have examined, under various conditions of induction with IPTG, how overexpression of these genes affects IS1 transposition, using an assay based on plasmid cointegration. When the insA and insB genes were organized identically to the wild-type IS1 genes and simultaneously expressed using low concentrations of IPTG, activity of a mutant IS1 in cis was restored, but not in trans. Higher IPTG concentrations resulted in lower transposition activity. Expression in trans of insA and insB results in a 50 to 100-fold reduction of the frequency of cointegration mediated by wild-type IS1. Such a reduction is also observed when only the insA gene is overexpressed in trans. Overexpression of either mutant insA or insB does not affect the cointegration event. Tests with the insA-lacZ fusion gene showed that the InsA product inhibits the expression of IS1 genes directed by its own promoter in insL. These results suggest that the InsA product regulates IS1 transposition by inhibiting expression of IS1 transposition genes in addition to acting as part of a transposase complex.

Second-element turn-on of gene expression in an IS1 insertion mutant

To learn more about the ways in which genes silenced by insertion mutations can be reactivated, we have undertaken a systematic investigation of Gal+ revertants of the polar mutant galOP-306::IS1 in Escherichia coli K12. The selective conditions used excluded reversion to wild type by precise excision of IS1. In this system (which resided on a multi-copy plasmid) reversion to the Gal+ phenotype occurred with a frequency of about 10(-7) per cell and per generation. Analysis of the revertants revealed that - with the single exception of the previously published chromosomal mutant sis1 - alterations in the structure of IS1 lead to reactivation of gal operon expression. These events fall into four classes: (I) insertion of IS2 at position 327 in IS1, insertion of IS2 at position 687 in IS1, (III) insertion of a hitherto undetected mobile element, IS150, at position 387, (IV) a 16-bp deletion encompassing IS1 coordinates 553-568. Of some 200 independent reversion events studied, all but one were of types I-III i.e. they involved the intervention of a second mobile element.