Intestinal permeability during chemotherapy for childhood tumours

Review on the effect of chemotherapy on the intestinal barrier: Epithelial permeability, mucus and bacterial translocation

Chemotherapy kills fast-growing cells including gut stem cells. This affects all components of the physical and functional intestinal barrier, i.e., the mucus layer, epithelium, and immune system. This results in an altered intestinal permeability of toxic compounds (e.g., endotoxins) as well as luminal bacterial translocation into the mucosa and central circulation. However, there is uncertainty regarding the relative contributions of the different barrier components for the development of chemotherapy-induced gut toxicity. This review present an overview of the intestinal mucosal barrier determined with various types of molecular probes and methods, and how they are affected by chemotherapy based on reported rodent and human data. We conclude that there is overwhelming evidence that chemotherapy increases bacterial translocation, and that it affects the mucosal barrier by rendering the mucosa more permeable to large permeability probes. Chemotherapy also seems to impede the intestinal mucus barrier, even though this has been less clearly evaluated from a functional standpoint but certainly plays a role in bacteria translocation. Combined, it is however difficult to outline a clear temporal or succession between the different gastrointestinal events and barrier functions, especially as chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is also involved in intestinal immunological homeostasis and bacterial translocation. A thorough characterization of this would need to include a time dependent development of neutropenia, intestinal permeability, and bacterial translocation, ideally after a range of chemotherapeutics and dosing regimens.

The significance of altered gastrointestinal permeability in cancer patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The diagnosis and assessment of severity of intestinal mucosal damage in cancer patients treated by anticancer therapy still rely mostly on anamnestic data. We review here studies reporting on the use of intestinal permeability measurements in cancer patients before and during treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The concept of intestinal permeability is based on differential permeability of intestinal mucosa to molecular markers, including monosaccharides and disaccharides, along the crypt-villus axis. Cytotoxic drugs and/or radiation impair replacement of intestinal epithelia and induce flattening of the villi, leading to increased exposure of luminal contents to crypts and increased disaccharide absorption. Increased disaccharide/monosaccharide ratio and decreased xylose absorption have been described in patients treated by radiotherapy as well as different cytotoxic or targeted agents across a spectrum of malignant disorders. Intestinal permeability changes correlated with clinical manifestations, including diarrhea, mucositis, neutropenic enterocolitis and systemic infections. The measurement of intestinal permeability has also been used as a surrogate end-point in interventional studies.

SUMMARY

Intestinal permeability testing using nonmetabolized sugars may represent a tool for noninvasive objective assessment of intestinal toxicity of anticancer therapy.

The gut mucosa barrier is preserved during allogeneic, haemopoietic stem cell transplantation with reduced intensity conditioning

The efficacy of allogeneic, haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is limited by concomitant toxicity. This has led to the development of less toxic, reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) protocols, whose therapeutic benefit is largely related to an associated, immunity-mediated graft-versus-malignancy effect rather than by the cytotoxic treatment itself. Murine HSCT models suggests that acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) increases with the intensification of the conditioning regimen mediated by loss of integrity of the gut mucosa barrier. The present study was undertaken to investigate gastro-intestinal (GI) permeability during allogeneic HSCT with RIC. In 17 patients (myeloablative conditioning in nine, RIC in eight), intestinal permeability was assessed by a (51)Cr-EDTA absorption test before the start of cytotoxic treatment the day before stem cell infusion (day -1) and 4, 7 and 14 days after stem cell infusion. Patients receiving RIC did not develop any significant increase in intestinal permeability during the transplantation course but in myeloablatively conditioned patients there was a significant increase in intestinal permeability the day before the stem cell infusion (P < 0.005), on day 4 (P < 0.005), on day 7 (P < 0.01) and on day 14 (P < 0.005) after stem cell infusion, compared with the baseline. Myeloablative conditioning also revealed increased intestinal permeability on day 7 compared with the RIC (P < 0.05). The finding of preserved intestinal-barrier function during allogeneic HSCT with RIC is discussed, with reference to the hypothesis that GI tract damage may be an important initiating event of GVHD.

Small bowel permeability in patients with cytostatic therapy

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of cytostatic therapy on the barrier function of the small bowel. In 16 patients with tumors in the gastrointestinal tract with metastatic involvement of the liver, small bowel permeability was measured using the lactulose/mannitol test. The patients were treated for 5 d with fluorouracil (750-1000 mg/d) and leucovorin (25-50 mg/d). The examination was performed on the first day, at the beginning of the cytostatic therapy, and also 5, 12, and 28 d after the therapy had begun. In comparing the start and the end of this therapy, the index of permeability was significantly increased (as measured 7 d after the end of therapy). These results show the damage of small bowel barrier after cytostatic therapy.

Nasogastric tube feedings in children with high-risk cancer: a pilot study

PURPOSE

To avoid the cost and complications of total parenteral nutrition (TPN), this study was initiated to determine the feasibility of administrating nasogastric tube feedings in children receiving intensive chemotherapy (CTX) or bone marrow transplantation (BMT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen children (aged 2 to 19 years) were entered into the study. Continuous nasogastric feedings of a glutamine-supplemented elemental diet were administered during CTX and at the time of rehospitalization for fever, neutropenia, and mucositis.

RESULTS

Fourteen children were treated with CTX and 3 with BMT. Enteral tube feedings were administered for 216 days; each patient received a mean of 12.7 days. The tubes were generally well tolerated, and there were no instances of sinusitis or epistaxis. Six children received TPN in addition to enteral feedings. The hospital charges for the enteral feedings were $25,348, compared to $112,299 for the same number of days of TPN.

CONCLUSIONS

Nasogastric tube insertion and enteral tube feedings in children receiving intensive CTX or BMT can be accomplished with minimal complications and significant cost savings when compared to TPN.

Intestinal permeability in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Intestinal permeability was studied in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) before, during and after chemotherapy. Intestinal permeability was determined by the lactulose (La)/mannitol (Ma) absorption test in 16 adult patients with de novo AML. The hydrogen breath test was used to disclose bacterial fermentation of the test substances in the small intestine. The permeability was found significantly increased (p<0.02) in the patients before induction chemotherapy treatment. During induction treatment and throughout the cytopenic period the intestinal permeability was constantly and significantly increased, compared with controls. In patients with abnormally increased permeability, no increase in hydrogen breath test result was noted. From our results it can be concluded that increased intestinal permeability is present in AML patients before commencing chemotherapy. Factors other than chemotherapy would seem to be more important regarding the occurrence of intestinal disturbances in these patients.

Intestinal permeability: an overview

The noninvasive assessment of intestinal permeability in humans has a 20-year history. Because the tests are increasingly used in clinical practice and research and because there is much controversy, we reviewed the literature and outlined the potential and possible shortcomings of these procedures. Data was obtained from personal files and from a systemic search through MEDLINE and EMBASE. The principle of the differential urinary excretion of orally administered test markers is explained with reference to the desired physicochemical properties of the markers and how the principle can be exploited to allow assessment of various other gastrointestinal functions. The use of intestinal permeability tests for diagnostic screen for small bowel disease and assessment of responses to treatment, the pathogenesis of disease, normal intestinal physiology, and the effect of drugs and toxins on the intestine is described and reviewed. The controversy surrounding the anatomic location of the permeation pathways that the markers use is highlighted. Noninvasive tests of intestinal permeability have fulfilled early promises of usefulness in clinical practice and research. There is now a need for integrated research into the basic mechanisms of regulatory control of the intestinal barrier function.

Intestinal permeability in pediatric gastroenterology

The role of the physiologic barrier function of the small bowel and its possible role in health and disease has attracted much attention over the past decade. The intestinal mucosal barrier for luminal macromolecules and microorganism is the result of non-immunologic and immunologic defense mechanisms. The non-immunologic mechanisms consist of intraluminal factors such as gastric acid, proteolytic activity, and motility and of mucosal surface factors like mucin and the microvillous membrane. The immunologic mechanisms include secretary IgA and cell-mediated immunity. Both types of mechanism are not completely mature at birth. Maturation of this barrier is not finished before the 2nd year of life. One of the aspects of the mucosal barrier function can be estimated by the intestinal permeability (IP) for macromolecules. We use the differential sugar absorption test (SAT), in which the ratio of urinary excretion of a relatively large molecule, lactulose, is compared with that of a relatively small molecule, mannitol, after oral ingestion. Although the small intestine is permeable to certain macromolecules in normal developmental conditions, an increased IP could be involved in the pathophysiology of several diseases, including infectious diarrhea, food allergy, celiac disease, and Crohn's disease. It can be concluded that IP, as measured with the SAT, reflects the state of the mucosal barrier and is altered in several gastrointestinal diseases. The SAT is a non-invasive IP test that can be of diagnostic help to demonstrate alterations in the small-mucosal barrier function and may be useful to evaluate therapeutic interventions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)