Serum level monitoring and therapeutic effect of haloperidol in schizophrenic patients

Age-related alteration of haloperidol-serum protein binding

Serum haloperidol levels were determined in 59 patients, 50-88-years-old, with psychosis, receiving long-term treatment with haloperidol. Although the total (bound and free form) haloperidol level in serum showed a linear correlation with daily dose, there was a larger variation in the relationship between free form and the daily dose compared with total because of inter-individual variation in the serum protein binding of haloperidol. The free fraction of haloperidol in serum increased with age. There was no difference in the ratio of total haloperidol level per daily dose between the adult and elderly groups, whereas the ratio of free haloperidol level per daily dose was significantly higher in the elderly than in the adult group. In the elderly, therefore, the therapeutic window of haloperidol should be assessed using free form level rather than total level, which is influenced by serum protein binding of the drug.

The relationship between serum concentration and therapeutic effect of haloperidol in patients with acute schizophrenia

Haloperidol is the most commonly used antipsychotic drug in the therapy of acute schizophrenia. Clinicians have been using therapeutic drug monitoring in an attempt to improve clinical application of this drug. The scale of interest in this area is emphasised by the large number of studies (about 50) concerning the serum concentration-therapeutic effect relationship (SCTER) of haloperidol, including 35 studies on patients with acute schizophrenia. However, conflicting results concerning the existence and position of a therapeutic window have emerged. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the study design of studies in patients with acute schizophrenia before the study data are used for decision-making. For this purpose, a reproducible system for the evaluation of studies in this special area, a so-called total study score (TSS), was developed on an empirical basis. Thus, insufficient study design was found to be a reason for negative results. On the other hand, in spite of a great variability, the majority of studies with good design provided evidence for a significant SCTER: a bisigmoidal dependence of clinical effect on haloperidol serum concentration. The therapeutic effects of haloperidol increase at low concentrations, and the concentration has a maximum effect at about 10 micrograms/L and again decreasing at higher concentrations. The data of 552 patients also fit to this model in a single scatter plot (pseudo-r2 = 0.076, p < 0.001). The position of the therapeutic window was determined at about 5.6 to 16.9 micrograms/L. Patients treated with serum concentrations within this optimal range had a significantly better response compared with outside this range (p < 0.001, Student t-test). Therefore, a quantitative synthesis of all available data by means of effect-size analysis provides a mean effect-size (g) = 0.499 +/- 0.182 (standard deviation) for the comparison of haloperidol-treatment with serum concentrations within versus outside the therapeutic window. Thus, because of this moderate positive effect, serum concentration assay of haloperidol is recommended for patients with acute schizophrenia in a therapeutic drug monitoring programme. The modalities of haloperidol therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice are discussed, e.g. patient selection, method and time for serum concentration measurement, influence of premedication and comedication, interpretation of results and dose adjustment. Clinical investigations into this subject should focus on covariates which are responsible for the variability of the SCTER. Serum concentration assay is advised for investigations of nonresponse to exclude patients with pseudo-drug resistance.

Lack of relationship of neuroleptic dose and blood serum levels to neuropsychological performance on the LNNB in chronic schizophrenia

The relationship of neuroleptic dose and blood serum levels to performance on the Luria Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery in chronic schizophrenics was assessed. Thirty chronic schizophrenics were individually administered the LNNB and a small sample of blood was obtained. No significant correlation between neuroleptic serum levels and test performance in these subjects was found although different conversion formulas related differentially to the blood serum levels.

Is there a relationship between antipsychotic blood levels and their clinical efficacy? An analysis of studies design and methodology

There are now more than 50 studies concerning neuroleptic blood levels and clinical outcome relationships. Haloperidol, the most studied, is the only antipsychotic permitting some conclusions. A number of authors suggest that the striking lack of agreement between different studies results from heterogeneity of their quality. Here, we have used a scoring system for assessing the quality of those studies. According to this system, none (0/14) of the studies having a score < 0.60 was able to show a therapeutic window, as compared to 53% (10/19) of those having a score > or = 0.60 (p = 0.002, Fisher exact test). Also, the studies able to identify the presence of a therapeutic window during haloperidol treatment were those having sample size > 20 (p = 0.06) and those whose patients were treated with fixed doses (p = 0.02). The diagnosis of schizophrenia in the studies seems not to be an exclusive condition, as compared with those also including schizophreniform and schizoaffective disorders (p = 0.12). Our qualitative analysis of haloperidol blood level publications seem to indicate that an upper limit may exist for haloperidol efficacy; values above this limit seem not to provide any supplementary clinical improvement and may even reduce therapeutic effect.

Megabore capillary gas-liquid chromatographic method with nitrogen-phosphorus selective detection for the assay of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol in serum: results of therapeutic drug-monitoring during acute therapy of eight schizophrenics

A gas chromatographic method using a HP-5 megabore capillary and nitrogen-phosphorus selective detection for the quantitative analysis of haloperidol (H) and reduced haloperidol (RH) in human serum or plasma is described. A 3-step liquid-liquid extraction is applied. The extraction yield of this procedure is 63% for haloperidol at 20 ng/ml. The limits of detection are 0.4 ng/ml for haloperidol and 1.0 ng/ml for the metabolite if 2 ml of body fluid are applied. At 10 ng/ml the within-day precision is 4.5% for H and 8.3% for RH. Serum levels of eight schizophrenic patients have been monitored weekly over a therapeutic period of six weeks. Seven patients mainly had metabolite ratios RH/H < 1 over the entire period of investigation. They exhibited a linear correlation between dose and serum concentration of haloperidol. In contrast, one patient had metabolite ratios RH/H > 1 over the entire period of the study. Due to considerable increased serum concentrations this patient did not show a linear correlation between the dose and the serum level of haloperidol.

Dose-dependent reduced haloperidol/haloperidol ratios in schizophrenic patients

Plasma haloperidol (HAL) and reduced HAL (RHAL) concentrations were measured in 113 Chinese schizophrenic patients. Daily doses of HAL ranged from 8 to 65 mg. Samples were obtained under steady-state conditions and drawn 10-12 hours after the bedtime dose and before the morning dose. In all, 313 blood samples were collected. Multiple samples were obtained at the same doses in 63 patients and at two or three different doses in 31 patients. HAL and RHAL concentrations were assayed by high performance liquid chromatography. Interpatient variation in plasma HAL levels at a given dosage was up to sixfold. However, there was a high positive correlation between plasma levels and daily dosages with the equation of HAL plasma level (ng/ml) = 0.88 x dosage (mg/day) -0.56 or 46.0 x dosage (mg/day/kg) + 0.28. The expected values are about 15-55% higher than those obtained from non-Chinese patients as reported in the literature. The RHAL/HAL ratios were dose-dependent. The greater the dose used, the higher the ratio. An upper therapeutic limit of plasma HAL level is suggested to be 25 ng/ml, which can be achieved at dosages about 30 mg/day in most Chinese patients. Based upon the dose-dependent increase in RHAL/HAL ratios, the importance of RHAL in determining the therapeutic benefit of HAL treatment is discussed.

Reduced haloperidol/haloperidol ratios in plasma: polymorphism in Japanese psychiatric patients

We measured plasma concentrations of haloperidol (HAL) and its metabolite, reduced haloperidol (RHAL), by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in 45 Japanese psychiatric patients receiving HAL. Plasma levels of HAL had a highly positive correlation with daily dose per body weight. Plasma RHAL/HAL ratios had also a dose-dependent relationship, but their distribution was nonnormal and a bimodal pattern with an antimode at 0.7 was apparent by probit analysis. There were 8 subjects (18%) with high RHAL/HAL ratios (mean = 1.26, SD = 0.41) and 37 subjects (82%) with low RHAL/HAL ratios (mean = 0.42, SD = 0.13). RHAL/HAL ratios showed little intraindividual variability (+/- 10.6%), while interindividual variability was large. This may suggest that pharmacogenetic factors are involved in the metabolism of HAL and RHAL.

Substantial rise in sparteine metabolic ratio during haloperidol treatment

A sparteine test was carried out in 14 patients suffering from acute schizophrenic psychoses before and 1-2 times during oral haloperidol treatment in doses of 10-40 mg day-1. In patients classified as extensive metabolisers (sparteine MR less than 20 before treatment), haloperidol treatment resulted in a rise in sparteine MR that correlated with the serum-haloperidol concentration both within and between patients. At the highest serum haloperidol concentrations (60-80 nM) an increase in sparteine MR by a factor 15-50 was seen, but no patients were transformed into phenotypically poor metabolisers. The steady state concentration of haloperidol on the initial standard dose of 10 mg day-1 was the same in one patient classified as a sparteine poor metaboliser (MR = 112) as in eleven patients classified as extensive metabolisers (MR:0.22-1.47).

A fixed dose study of the plasma concentration and clinical effects of thioridazine and its major metabolites

Fifty-three patients in an acute episode or exacerbation of psychosis were given thioridazine 200 or 400 mg daily for 2 weeks. Thioridazine and its active metabolites, mesoridazine and sulforidazine, were estimated in plasma by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and radioreceptor assay (RRA). One week after institution of treatment, plasma concentrations of drug were stable in the morning 12h after dosing. Drug levels varied widely between patients, but in all patients the relative level of thioridazine to mesoridazine was about one half and thioridazine to sulforidazine was about two fold. Estimates of neuroleptic activity by RRA and the weighted sum of thioridazine, mesoridazine and sulforidazine by HPLC were very similar. Plasma concentration of parent compound, metabolites, or the sum of active substances as estimated by HPLC or RRA, showed only modest correlations (rs = 0.10-0.22, all NS) to the degree of improvement as measured by change on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Significant correlations were observed between plasma concentrations of drug and side effects, including dry mouth, blurred vision, or total rating on the Somatic Symptoms Scale. Even patients receiving the lowest dose and achieving the lowest plasma concentrations of drug showed considerable improvement. There was suggestive evidence that the patients achieving the highest plasma levels of drug did not have the best clinical outcome. These and similar observations from other studies suggest that currently used doses of neuroleptics may be excessive. Optimal drug effects as well as stronger relationships between dose, drug concentration, and clinical therapeutic effects might best be sought at doses below those in common use.

A rapid and simplified extraction of haloperidol from plasma or serum with bond elut C18 cartridge for analysis by high performance liquid chromatography

This method for the determination of haloperidol (HAL) in plasma is based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a reversed-phase column, ODS-C18. HAL is rapidly extracted from human plasma by using Bond Elut C18 cartridge and its recovery is over 90%. The mobile phase is a mixture of 1% acetate/acetonitrile/tetrahydrofuran/triethylamine (69.5: 28.2:1.9:0.4, by vol.). The method is rapid, simple and free from intereferences and gives good precision.

Plasma level monitoring of antipsychotic drugs. Clinical utility

The steady-state plasma concentrations of antipsychotic drugs show large interpatient variations but remain relatively stable from day to day in each individual patient. Monitoring of antipsychotic drug concentrations in plasma might be of value provided the patients are treated with only 1 antipsychotic drug. Some studies have reported a relationship between therapeutic response and serum antipsychotic drug 'concentrations' as measured using the radioreceptor assay (RRA) method, which measures dopamine receptor-blocking activity in plasma. Most studies, however, have failed to demonstrate such a relationship, and the RRA does not seem to provide the generally useful tool for plasma concentration monitoring of antipsychotic drugs that was hoped for initially. A lack of correlation between dopamine receptor-blocking activity in plasma and therapeutic response may be due to differences in the blood-brain distribution of both antipsychotic drugs and their active metabolites. Chemical assay methods (e.g. GLC and HPLC) have been used in studies which examined the relationships between therapeutic response and antipsychotic drug concentrations in red blood cells and in plasma. It seems that for these drugs, measuring red blood cell concentrations does not offer any significant advantage over measuring plasma concentrations. Reasonably controlled studies of plasma concentration-response relationships using randomly allocated, fixed dosages of chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, haloperidol, perphenazine, sulpiride, thioridazine and thiothixene have been published but often involve relatively few patients. A correlation between therapeutic response and plasma concentrations of thioridazine and its metabolites has not been demonstrated, and plasma level monitoring of thioridazine and its metabolites therefore appears to have no clinical value. Clinical behavioural deterioration concomitant with high plasma concentrations of chlorpromazine and haloperidol have been reported. A dosage reduction might be considered after 2 to 4 weeks' treatment in non-responders who have plasma chlorpromazine concentrations above 100 to 150 micrograms/L or plasma haloperidol concentrations above 20 to 30 micrograms/L. Non-responders and good responders to chlorpromazine treatment, however, have plasma drug concentrations in the same range, and a therapeutic range of plasma chlorpromazine levels has not been defined. Therapeutic plasma haloperidol concentrations (i.e. 'window') in the range of 5 to 20 micrograms/L have been reported by some investigators, but others have found no such relationship.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Haloperidol plasma levels and clinical response in paranoid schizophrenics

The relationship between haloperidol plasma levels, plasma prolactin, and therapeutic efficacy was evaluated in 20 paranoïd schizophrenics in a fixed-dose study for 6 weeks. We found a significant intrapatient cross-correlation of therapeutic efficacy, as measured by decrease in MSS and BPRS rating scales and time-dependent haloperidol and prolactin changes, which were tested at weekly intervals. However, no significant curvilinear relationship was present between steady-state haloperidol plasma levels and MSS and BPRS improvement scores. Our data do not furnish clear-cut evidence in favor of the existence of a therapeutic window for haloperidol plasma levels in paranoïd schizophrenia.

The relationship of dopamine receptor blockade to clinical response in schizophrenic patients treated with pimozide or haloperidol

Pimozide and haloperidol were found to be equally effective in the treatment of acute schizophrenia in a double-blind clinical trial involving 22 patients. Drug plasma levels measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) did not correlate with clinical response following either drug. Nor was there any correlation between clinical response and the dopamine receptor blocking activity of either drug as measured by radio receptor assay (RRA). Following pimozide plasma prolactin (PRL) levels correlated with clinical change, although the time courses of response of PRL and clinical response were dissimilar. There was no correlation between PRL and clinical response to haloperidol. RRA and RIA values correlated highly following pimozide but not haloperidol. Our findings lead us to conclude that the RRA technique reflects the plasma level of a drug rather than its central dopamine blocking activity. We also consider that the clinical response to antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia may be less directly linked to dopamine receptor blockade than has previously been supposed.

Serum neuroleptic and prolactin levels in schizophrenic patients and clinical response

Following a drug-free placebo period lasting at least 1 week, 10 female and 11 male newly hospitalized schizophrenic patients received chlorpromazine (CPZ) 200 mg/day for 1 week and 400 mg/day the following week. Serum CPZ equivalent (CPZ-E) levels were measured at the end of each week of CPZ treatment with a radioreceptor assay. Chlorpromazine-E levels were significantly higher in females than males, but this finding could be accounted for by differences in body weight. Serum prolactin (PRL) levels were also higher in females than males. After differences in serum CPZ-E level were adjusted for, females still had significantly higher serum PRL levels than males. Serum PRL levels increased between the first and second treatment weeks in females but not in males. Correlations between serum CPZ-E and PRL levels were higher among males than females. Significant improvement for the patient group as a whole was observed during the 2 weeks of treatment, with a strong trend for females to improve more than males. Clinical outcome at this initial period was not predicted by either serum PRL levels or serum CPZ-E levels.