Late displacement of Colles' fractures

Non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures in adult patients < 50 years of age : Three weeks of cast immobilisation versus one week of brace immobilisation: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Currently, non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures are treated by 3 to 5 weeks of cast immobilisation. Many patients with a distal radius fracture suffer from long-term functional restrictions, which might be related to stiffness due to cast immobilisation. Current literature indicates that 1 week of immobilisation might be safe; however, no level 1 evidence is available. This trial aims to compare 1 week of brace immobilisation with 3 weeks of cast immobilisation in patients with distal radius fractures that do not need reduction.

METHODS

The aim of this trial is to evaluate the non-inferiority of 1 week of brace immobilisation in patients with non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures. A two-armed single blinded multicentre randomised clinical trial will be conducted in three hospitals. Adult patients, between 18 and 50 years old, independent for activities of daily living, with a non- or minimally displaced distal radius fracture can be included in this study. The intervention group is treated with 1 week of brace immobilisation, and the control group with 3 weeks of cast immobilisation. Primary outcome is the patient-reported outcome measured by the Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation score (PRWE) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes are patient-reported outcome measured by the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score at 6 weeks and 6 months, PRWE at 6 weeks, range of motion, patient-reported pain score measured by VAS score, radiological outcome (dorsal/volar tilt, radial height, ulnar variance, presence of intra-articular step off), complications and cost-effectiveness measured by the EuroQol 5 Dimension questionnaire, Medical Consumption Questionnaire and Productivity Cost Questionnaire.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide evidence on the optimal period of immobilisation in non-operatively treated displaced and reduced distal radius fractures. Both treatment options are accepted treatment protocols and both treatment options have a low risk of complications. Follow-up will be according to the current treatment protocol. This study will provide level 1 evidence on the optimal period and way of immobilisation for non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures in adult patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ABR 81638 | NL81638.029.22 | www.toetsingonline.nl . 18th of October 2023.

Distal radial fractures in adults: 4 versus 6 weeks of cast immobilisation after closed reduction, a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE

In this study, we aim to evaluate whether the functional outcome of Distal Radius Fractures (DRFs) could be enhanced by shortening the period of immobilisation from six weeks to four weeks.

METHODS

This study is a single blinded randomised controlled trial. Four week plaster cast immobilisation was compared with six week plaster cast immobilisation in adult patients (older than 18 years) with adequately reduced DRFs. The primary outcome parameters were functional outcome measured by Quick DASH score after 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes were: Quick DASH after three months, 6 months, range of motion, and complications (such as number of re-interventions, secondary displacement, delayed and non-union).

RESULTS

80 patients (16 male and 64 female, mean age, 61.76 years) were included and randomized. 65 patients completed the 1-year follow-up. After 1-year follow up, no significant differences were found between the two groups in the QUICK DASH score (P = 0.55). Moreover, no significant differences in DASH Score after three and six months (P = 0.24, 0.28, respectively). The complication rate among both cohorts was almost similar, (P = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

Reduction in the time of cast immobilisation in patients with DRFs in accepted position reported similar outcomes. Of note, the complication rate in the four and six weeks was also the same. Thus, 4 weeks in cast is a safe immobilisation period. Clinical Trials Number Trial registration number and date of registration for prospectively registered trials at http://ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05012345), on 19/08/2021.

Marginal secondary displacement in fractures of the distal radius at follow-up - an important predictor for late displacement and malunion

Treatment recommendations in fractures of the distal radius are often based on the degree of displacement and functional demands. The fracture may be within an acceptable radiological range, but a marginal deterioration in alignment then occurs between the initial visit and follow-up. This may pose a risk for late displacement that may require further treatment. We secondarily analysed prospectively collected data and included 165 patients. We found that marginal secondary displacement (odds ratio (OR) 9.7), anterior comminution (OR 8.8), loss of anterior apposition (OR 6.8) and dorsal comminution (OR 2.6) were predictors of late displacement. Marginal secondary displacement is an important predictor of late displacement and malunion in fractures of the distal radius. Clinicians should not unequivocally accept general guidelines on alignment but also assess a deterioration in fracture alignment on radiographic follow-up and be aware of the potential need for surgery to avoid malunion in cases that show early secondary displacement, even when radiographic measures are within acceptable limits.Level of evidence: III.

Functional bracing in distal radius fractures: a cadaveric pilot study

Background

Extra-articular distal radius fractures are often treated by circular casting. A functional brace, however, may equally support the fracture zone but allows early mobilization of the radiocarpal joint. Since the amount of fracture movement for different types of fixation is currently unknown, a study was initiated to investigate the degree of bone displacement in extra-articular distal radius fractures fixated by regular circular casting, functional bracing, or no-fixation.

Methods

In four cadaveric arms, an extra-articular distal radius fracture was simulated and immobilized by the three ways of fixation. After creating an extra-articular distal radius fracture, the fracture was reduced anatomically and the cadaveric arm was strapped in a test frame. Hereafter, flexion, extension and deviation of the hand were then induced by a static moment of force of one newton meter. Subsequently CT scans of the wrist were performed and bone displacement was quantified.

Results

Immobilization of an extra-articular distal radius fracture by functional bracing provides comparable fixation compared to circular casting and no fixation, and shows significantly less extension-rotation displacement of the distal bone segment for the wrist in flexion and palmodorsal translation and extension-rotation for the wrist in extension.

Conclusion

Functional bracing of extra articular distal radius fractures in cadaveric arms provides significant less extension-rotation displacement in flexion and palmodorsal translation and extension-rotation in extension compared to circular casting and no fixation.

Distinct dynamics and functions of H2AK119ub1 and H3K27me3 in mouse preimplantation embryos

Polycomb repressive complexes 1 and 2 (PRC1/2) maintain transcriptional silencing of developmental genes largely by catalyzing the formation of mono-ubiquitinated histone H2A at lysine 119 (H2AK119ub1) and trimethylated histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3), respectively. How Polycomb domains are reprogrammed during mammalian preimplantation development remains largely unclear. Here we show that, although H2AK119ub1 and H3K27me3 are highly colocalized in gametes, they undergo differential reprogramming dynamics following fertilization. H3K27me3 maintains thousands of maternally biased domains until the blastocyst stage, whereas maternally biased H2AK119ub1 distribution in zygotes is largely equalized at the two-cell stage. Notably, while maternal PRC2 depletion has a limited effect on global H2AK119ub1 in early embryos, it disrupts allelic H2AK119ub1 at H3K27me3 imprinting loci including Xist. By contrast, acute H2AK119ub1 depletion in zygotes does not affect H3K27me3 imprinting maintenance, at least by the four-cell stage. Importantly, loss of H2AK119ub1, but not H3K27me3, causes premature activation of developmental genes during zygotic genome activation (ZGA) and subsequent embryonic arrest. Thus, our study reveals distinct dynamics and functions of H3K27me3 and H2AK119ub1 in mouse preimplantation embryos.

Association of secondary displacement of distal radius fractures with cortical bone quality at the distal radius

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of patient characteristics, bone mineral density (BMD), bone microarchitecture and calculated bone strength with secondary displacement of a DRF based on radiographic alignment parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dorsal angulation, radial inclination and ulnar variance were assessed on conventional radiographs of a cohort of 251 patients, 38 men and 213 women, to determine the anatomic position of the DRF at presentation (primary position) and during follow-up. Secondary fracture displacement was assessed in the non-operatively treated patients (N = 154) with an acceptable position, preceded (N = 97) or not preceded (N = 57) by primary reduction (baseline position). Additionally, bone microarchitecture and calculated bone strength at the contralateral distal radius and tibia were assessed by HR-pQCT in a subset of, respectively, 63 and 71 patients.

OUTCOME

Characteristics of patients with and without secondary fracture displacement did not differ. In the model with adjustment for primary reduction [OR 22.00 (2.27-212.86), p = 0.008], total [OR 0.16 (95% CI 0.04-0.68), p = 0.013] and cortical [OR 0.19 (95% CI 0.05-0.80], p = 0.024] volumetric BMD (vBMD) and cortical thickness [OR 0.13 (95% CI 0.02-0.74), p = 0.021] at the distal radius were associated with secondary DRF displacement. No associations were found for other patient characteristics, such as age gender, BMD or prevalent vertebral fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study indicates that besides primary reduction, cortical bone quality may be important for the risk of secondary displacement of DRFs.

Duration of Cast Immobilization in Distal Radial Fractures: A Systematic Review

Objective  The duration of immobilization in distal radial fractures is disputed in the current literature. There are still no long-term superior outcomes of operative treatment in comparison to nonoperative treatment. A systematic review was initiated to assess the clinical controversy on the duration of the immobilization period for nonoperatively treated distal radial fractures. Materials and Methods  A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Wiley/Cochrane Library databases and a manual reference check of the identified systematic reviews and meta-analyses was executed. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials that compared two periods of immobilization, with reported functional, patient-reported, and radiological outcomes. Two reviewers independently agreed on eligibility, and assessed methodological quality and extracted outcome data. Results  The initial search yielded 3.384 studies. Twelve trials, with 1063 patients, were included in this systematic review. Grip strength and patient-reported outcome were better in patients treated by a shorter period of immobilization. There was no difference in pain, range of motion, or radiological outcome between different periods of immobilization. Owing to heterogeneity of studies, data were unsuitable for pooling. Conclusion  Included studies showed that there might be a preference for a shorter period of immobilization in nonoperatively treated distal radius fractures. Therefore, shortening the period of immobilization in distal radial fractures to a maximum of three weeks should be considered. Future research should include homogeneous groups of patients to draw valid conclusions on the appropriate period of immobilization for nonoperatively treated distal radial fractures. Level of Evidence  This is a Level II study. Systematic Review Registration Number  PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018085524.

Dislocated distal radial fractures in adult patients: 4 weeks versus 6 weeks of cast immobilisation following reduction, a multicentre randomised controlled trial, study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Up to 30% of patients with a dislocated distal radial fracture (DRF) treated with closed reduction and cast immobilisation suffer from long-term functional restrictions. It remains unclear, whether duration of cast immobilisation influences functional outcome. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether the functional outcome of dislocated DRFs could be improved by shortening the period of immobilisation.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A single blinded multicentre randomised controlled trial is initiated. Four weeks of plaster cast immobilisation is compared with six week plaster cast immobilisation in adult patients with adequate reduced DRFs. Primary outcome parameters are functional outcome measured with the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation after 1 year of follow-up (FU). Secondary outcomes are: Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score after 1 year, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey after 1 year, functional outcome earlier in FU (6 weeks, 12 weeks and 6 months), range of motion, pain level and complications: number of re-interventions, secondary dislocation, delayed and non-union.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The medical ethical committee VUmc approved the study protocol (2018.004, NL62861.029.17). The expectation of this study is that a shorter duration of plaster cast immobilisation is beneficial. This risk of specific complications is low and generally similar in both treatment options. FU is standardised according to current trauma guidelines. Present literature indicates that both treatment options that are used within this study are accepted protocols for treatment of dislocated DRFs. This trial will provide Level-I evidence for the comparison of functional outcome between the two treatment options for dislocated DRFs. Results of this study are expected to be published as a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial article in 2021.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Netherlands National Trial Register: NTR 6600, ABR: NL62861.029.17. Medical Ethical Committee VUmc registration number: 2018.004.

Non- or Minimally Displaced Distal Radial Fractures in Adult Patients: Three Weeks versus Five Weeks of Cast Immobilization-A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background  Patients with non- or minimally displaced distal radial fractures, that do not need repositioning, are mostly treated by a short-arm cast for a period of 4 to 6 weeks. A shorter period of immobilization may lead to a better functional outcome. Purpose  We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether the duration of cast immobilization for patients with non- or minimally displaced distal radial fractures can be safely shortened toward 3 weeks. Materials and Methods  The primary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes measured by the Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score after 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures were: PRWE and QuickDASH earlier in follow-up, pain (Visual Analog Scale), and complications like secondary displacement. Results  Seventy-two patients (male/female, 23/49; median age, 55 years) were included and randomized. Sixty-five patients completed the 1-year follow-up. After 1-year follow up, patients in the 3 weeks immobilization group had significantly better PRWE (5.0 vs. 8.8 points, p  = 0.045) and QuickDASH scores (0.0 vs. 12.5, p  = 0.026). Secondary displacement occurred once in each group. Pain did not differ between groups ( p  = 0.46). Conclusion  Shortening the period of immobilization in adult patients with a non- or minimally displaced distal radial fractures seems to lead to equal patient-reported outcomes for both the cast immobilization groups. Also, there are no negative side effects of a shorter period of cast immobilization. Therefore, we recommend a period of 3 weeks of immobilization in patients with distal radial fractures that do not need repositioning.

PEEK radiolucent plate for distal radius fractures: multicentre clinical results at 12 months follow up

INTRODUCTION

Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plate and screws represents the recommended treatment for unstable intra-articular distal radius fractures. Although significant progresses in surgical technique have been made, anatomical reconstruction of radio-carpal articular surface still represent a difficult task, especially in multifragmentary fractures. Available PEEK reinforced-carbon fiber composite radiolucent devices allow both an easier and more careful assessment of intra-operative reduction of the articular surface of distal radius and prompt correction of any residual step deformity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiological multicentre results of 71 consecutive AO B and C fracture pattern of distal radius treated using the same PEEK reinforced-carbon fiber composite radiolucent plate.

RESULTS

Three patients lost at final follow up and 4 cases with incomplete radiological documentations were excluded from the study. 64 patients (38 females, 26 males) were available and formed the basis of this report. Fracture types included 9 patients with 23-B, 13 patients 23-B2,15 patients with 23-B3,10 patients with 23-C1, 7 patients with 23-C2 and 10 patients with 23-C3. Mean Modified Mayo wrist Score was on average 38.11 (SD 10.1; range 24-75, 95%CI 34.7-41.4), 67.22 (SD 9.6, range 50-90, 95%CI 64-70.4), 90.54 (SD 6.3, range 75-100, 95%CI 88.4-92.6) at one, two and twelve months of follow-up, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between mean scores at different follow-up periods (p = 0.001). We noted 1 case of distal screw fixation aseptic loosening at 5 months post surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

PEEK reinforced-carbon fiber composite radiolucent plate represents a useful device for treatment of complex distal radius fractures in the adult population. It possesses unique biomechanical properties and allows for an easier anatomical reduction during surgical intervention.

Radiographic results after plaster cast fixation for 10 days versus 1 month in reduced distal radius fractures: a prospective randomised study

Background

The aim of this study was to examine whether reduced distal radius fractures can be treated with early mobilisation without affecting the radiographic results.

Methods

In a prospective randomised study, 109 patients (mean age 65.8 (range 50–92)) with moderately displaced distal radius fractures were treated with closed reduction and plaster cast fixation for about 10 days (range 8–13 days) followed by randomisation to one of two groups: early mobilisation (n = 54, active group) or continued plaster cast fixation for another 3 weeks (n = 55, control group).

Results

For three patients in the active group (6%), treatment proved unsuccessful because of severe displacement of the fracture (n = 2) or perceived instability (n = 1). From 10 days to 1 month, i.e. the only period when the treatment differed between the two groups, the active group displaced significantly more in dorsal angulation (4.5°, p < 0.001), radial angulation (2.0°, p < 0.001) and axial compression (0.5 mm, p = 0.01) compared with the control group. However, during the entire study period (i.e. from admission to 12 months), the active group displaced significantly more than the controls only in radial angulation (3.2°, p = 0.002) and axial compression (0.7 mm, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

Early mobilisation 10 days after reduction of moderately displaced distal radius fractures resulted in both an increased number of treatment failures and increased displacement in radial angulation and axial compression as compared with the control group. Mobilisation 10 days after reduction cannot be recommended for the routine treatment of reduced distal radius fractures.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrail.gov, NCT02798614. Retrospectively registered 16 June 2016.

Examining the influence of distal radius orientation on distal radioulnar joint contact using a finite element model

Distal radius malunion is a problem that is common to distal radius fractures and can affect the contact mechanics of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). The goal of this study was to use a computational model of the DRUJ to investigate the influence distal radius orientation has on its contact mechanics. Detailed, finite element models of the radius and ulna bones were constructed from magnetic resonance imaging data. The orientation of the distal radius was rotated in 2° increments about three orthogonal axes representing dorsal-palmar rotation, radial-ulnar rotation and anteversion-retroversion. A computational model was used to predict joint contact at the DRUJ in each condition. Joint contact was found to be most sensitive to dorsal rotation of the distal radius, while radial and ulnar rotation did not substantially affect joint contact pressure. Slight retroversion was found to lower joint contact pressure. In most cases, more than 6° rotation in a given direction resulted in dislocation of the DRUJ, so that adaptation at the joint would be required to maintain articular contact. The joint contact model implemented in this study allowed the relationship between distal radius orientation and DRUJ contact to be examined systematically, in a way that is difficult to achieve using a cadaver-based approach. The results demonstrated the distal radius displacements most critical for maintaining healthy joint mechanics at the DRUJ. It is important that clinicians consider the influence of distal radius malunion and its treatment on DRUJ mechanics, in addition to its consequences for wrist function and forearm rotation. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Study protocol: non-displaced distal radial fractures in adult patients: three weeks vs. five weeks of cast immobilization: a randomized trial

Background

Up to 30% of patients suffer from long-term functional restrictions following conservative treatment of distal radius fractures. Whether duration of cast immobilisation influences functional outcome remains unclear.

Methods/Design

The aim of the study is to evaluate whether the duration of immobilization of non or minimally displaced distal radial fractures can be safely reduced. We will compare three weeks of plaster cast immobilization with five weeks of plaster cast immobilization in adult patient with non or minimally displaced distal radial fractures.

Study design: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Study population: adult (>18 years) (independent in activities of daily living) patients with a non/minimal displaced distal radius fracture (dorsal angulation <15°, volar tilt <20°, radial inclination >15°, ulnar positive variance <5 mm and an articular step off <2 mm).

Intervention: three weeks of plaster cast immobilization versus five weeks of plaster cast immobilization.

Main study parameters: primary outcome parameters: Patient related wrist evaluation (PRWE) Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QUICKDASH) score after a one year follow-up, and secondary parameters: range of motion, pain level (VAS) and complications.

Discussion

The expectation of this study is that shorter duration of plaster cast immobilisation is beneficial for the patient with a distal radius fracture. This risk of specific complications is low and generally similar in both treatment options. Moreover, the burden of the study is not much higher compared to standard treatment. Follow-up is standardized according to current trauma guidelines. Literature indicates that both treatment options from the study are accepted for displaced distal radius fractures. No clear advantage for one treatment options is found at present in the literature, although there is no level I evidence present. This trial will provide level-1 evidence for the comparison of consolidation and functional outcome between two treatment options for non-displaced distal radial fractures. The gathered data may support the development of a clinical guideline for conservative treatment of distal radial fractures.

Trial registration

Netherlands National Trial Register NTR3552.

Radiological criteria for acceptable reduction of extra-articular distal radial fractures are not predictive for patient-reported functional outcome

The purpose of this study was to assess the association between arm-specific disability measured with the QuickDASH questionaire and radiological criteria in patients with extra-articular distal radial fractures. A consecutive series of 385 patients were initially treated non-operatively for an extra-articular distal radial fracture and 257 (69 %) patients were included in the study. In 203 of these patients (78%) the quality of radiographic reduction was judged to be adequate by radiological parameters, which included dorsal tilt, radial inclination, and radial shortening. In 54 patients (22%) the quality of radiographic alignment was judged to be inadequate. We observed no effect of radiographic parameters on the functional outcome. Female sex and longer duration of follow-up (>35 months) were the only independent prognostic factors significantly associated with a worse QuickDASH score.

Identifying candidate genes for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and obesity through gene expression profiling in multiple tissues or cells

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and obesity have become increasingly prevalent in recent years. Recent studies have focused on identifying causal variations or candidate genes for obesity and T2DM via analysis of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) within a single tissue. T2DM and obesity are affected by comprehensive sets of genes in multiple tissues. In the current study, gene expression levels in multiple human tissues from GEO datasets were analyzed, and 21 candidate genes displaying high percentages of differential expression were filtered out. Specifically, DENND1B, LYN, MRPL30, POC1B, PRKCB, RP4-655J12.3, HIBADH, and TMBIM4 were identified from the T2DM-control study, and BCAT1, BMP2K, CSRNP2, MYNN, NCKAP5L, SAP30BP, SLC35B4, SP1, BAP1, GRB14, HSP90AB1, ITGA5, and TOMM5 were identified from the obesity-control study. The majority of these genes are known to be involved in T2DM and obesity. Therefore, analysis of gene expression in various tissues using GEO datasets may be an effective and feasible method to determine novel or causal genes associated with T2DM and obesity.

Management of distal radius fractures: treatment protocol and functional results

Distal radius fractures are the most frequent lesions encountered during clinical practice. The treatment is controversial and still debated in the literature. For a correct management of these lesions many authors recently emphasised the importance of anatomical reduction, a stable fixation and early joint mobilisation. We report our experience in the daily management of these lesions. The fractures are evaluated considering fracture type, fracture reduction criteria, adequacy of reduction criteria and overall fracture stability. The best treatment option must be decided in accordance to the type of fracture, the extent of metaphyseal comminution, the quality of the bone and the medical condition of the patient.

How many clinic visits does it take to treat distal radial fractures?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in alignment during the course of treatment for extra-articular distal radius fracture and the relationship of initial and intermediate radiographs, with the final radiograph taken at fracture union. A cohort of 96 consecutive patients who were conservatively managed for extra-articular distal radius fracture in an 18-month period was undertaken. The radiographs analysed were taken at prereduction, postreduction, a week later and at fracture union. The radiological parameters analysed were radial tilt, radial length, radial inclination, dorsal comminution and ulnar styloid fracture. There was a significant change in radiographic alignment between initial and immediate postreduction radiographs, and between postreduction 1 week later radiographs (p < 0.05), but the number of patients in the 1 week later and fracture union groups remained similar (p > 0.05). All patients with poor radiological outcome had ulnar styloid fractures. This was also associated with dorsal comminution in 86% of patients. Patients with satisfactory radiological outcome had ulnar styloid fracture and comminution in 34% and 43% of patients respectively. The final radiological outcome was not found to be influenced by initial unsatisfactory alignment of radial tilt, radial length and radial inclination individually or in combination. We suggest that two clinic visits after initial reduction of the fracture should be sufficient to manage such injuries; the first visit 1 week after manipulation to detect unacceptable displacement and if found satisfactory, the last visit at fracture union for final review, advice and referral to physiotherapy.

The Wrist: Common Injuries and Management

Primary care physicians not only have an important role in the diagnosis and initial treatment of wrist injuries, but also play a key role in the education of families about prevention. Children and adolescents are often competitive in sports throughout the year. Periods of rest can be important in prevention of overuse injuries in the very active, developing athlete. Protective gear such as wrist guards, used during activities such as inline skating and snowboarding, has been shown to prevent acute injuries that often require surgery or lead to prolonged disability [84,85].A primary care physician will often be the first health care provider to assess most wrist complaints. The intent of this article is to familiarize the primary care physician with the most common wrist injuries in active people, and to demonstrate that many injuries can have poor outcomes if unrecognized. It is important to have good clinical knowledge of the functional anatomy of the wrist in order to maximize the information gathered on examination and to narrow one's differential diagnosis. The athlete's sport and desires regarding return to play, and the impact of the timing of injury management on his or her further participation in sport are important to consider. A highly active person may be referred to a musculoskeletal specialist for advanced testing or surgical repair earlier in the evaluation of certain injuries than a less active one. Armed with good clinical knowledge of anatomy and an understanding of common wrist injuries,primary care physicians can successfully manage many wrist complaints.

An Evaluation of Two Scoring Systems to Predict Instability in Fractures of the Distal Radius

BACKGROUND

Various scoring scales have been introduced in the management of patients with multiple injuries and lower extremity injuries. Two scoring systems have been introduced to predict instability in distal radius fractures. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the accuracy of these two models in predicting instability.

METHODS

A prospective study of 105 consecutive patients sustaining unilateral closed distal radius fractures was performed. Two scoring systems--the MacKenney formula and the Adolphson formula--were used to calculate the probability of fracture instability on the basis of initial presentation and injury films. The predicted probability of instability calculated from both models was then compared with actual results of instability on the basis of specific radiographic criteria at follow-up.

RESULTS

Final follow-up information was available on 80 patients. There were 44 unstable fractures and 36 stable fractures at final follow-up. Using the MacKenney formula, of the 38 fractures predicted to have a low probability of instability (Pinstability < 30%), 18 (47.4%) were found to be unstable. Using the Adolphson formula, of the 28 fractures predicted to have a low probability of instability (Pstability > 70%), 14 (50%) were actually unstable.

CONCLUSION

Both scoring systems were found to underestimate the degree of fracture instability and to have a negative predictive value between 47 and 50% in a prospective series of patients. In fractures predicted to have a low probability of instability in both models, we found a poor correlation between predicted instability and actual instability. Our results demonstrate the limitations of two scoring systems in predicting fracture stability and in making clinical decisions on the basis of their results.

Conservative treatment of redisplaced Colles' fractures in elderly patients older than 60 years old - anatomical and functional outcome

A retrospective study was carried out to compare the functional outcome in two groups of patients who were 60 years old or older. One group had Colles' fractures, which had been reduced and did not redisplace. The other group's fractures redisplaced and were treated conservatively. Of the 11 patients in the first group, 82% had excellent or good functional outcome, which was not significantly different when compared with the second group of 25 patients with 68% having excellent or good functional outcome.

Length of immobilisation after fractures of the distal radius

Thirty-three patients with undisplaced fractures of the distal radius were included in a clinical controlled trial with the purpose of evaluating whether it was safe to reduce the time of immobilisation in a plaster splint from 5 to 3 weeks. We did not find any difference in radiological healing at 3 months or in the functional scores after 3 and 9 months.

Prediction of secondary displacement in Colles' fracture

In a prospective study, 645 consecutive Colles' fractures treated conservatively were followed until union. The fractures subsequently lost some of their manipulated position during the immobilization period. However, the anatomical end result was significantly improved compared with the initial deformity. The mean shortening of the radius during plaster-cast treatment was 3 mm, and the mean increase of dorsal angulation was 7 degrees. Multiple regression analyses showed that initial dorsal angulation, age, and Older type were important predictor variables for the end result of dorsal angulation. Initial radial length, age and initial dorsal angulation were of importance for the end result of radial length. The strongest linear relationship was found between the end result of radial length and the initial radial length (r = 0.67). This may indicate that the patients who will malunite with radial shortening are those with significant radial axial shortening at the initial presentation. Thus, these patients should be treated with a more stable fixation device.

Early and late displacement of fractures of the distal radius. The prediction of instability

One hundred fractures of the distal radius with dorsal displacement were treated by closed reduction and a plaster cast. The mean age of the patients was 55 years. Radiographs were taken after 1, 2 and 5 weeks to evaluate the frequency of early and late displacement. Dorsal angulation occurred in 71 patients, shortening of the radius in 47 and flattening of the radial angle in 32. Late displacement was more frequent than early. Statistical analysis showed a greater incidence of secondary shortening in Older's types III and IV fractures. The severity of the initial radial shortening was the most reliable indication of instability.

No effects of piroxicam on osteopenia and recovery after Colles' fracture. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective trial

In a randomized double-blind study involving 42 postmenopausal women with a displaced Colles' fracture, we investigated whether piroxicam, a nonsteroid anti-inflammatory drug, can reduce posttraumatic osteopenia and improve the rate of recovery. In an earlier study [3] we found a bone-sparing effect caused by piroxicam after external fixation of the rabbit hindleg. The patients were treated with a below-elbow paster slab for 4 weeks after the reduction. The bone mineral content of the forearm bones was measured with a single-photon absorptiometer 8 weeks after the fracture. There was a mean 7% bone mineral decrease in the radius and 5% in the ulna among the patients treated with piroxicam versus 10% in the radius and 7% in the ulna in the placebo group. However, this difference was not significant. Piroxicam did not decrease the rate of fracture healing. The patients who received piroxicam had significantly less pain during plaster treatment, but there was no difference in the rate of functional recovery between the groups.

Prediction of instability of Colles' fractures

The tendency of 267 consecutive Colles' fractures to dislocate during plaster-cast treatment was correlated with several parameters measured from the initial radiographs. Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that radial axial shortening had the greatest prognostic power. The age of the patient and Lidström's class provided additional prognostic information. Initial radial axial shortening of 5 mm or more generally indicated an unfavorable anatomic end result.