Association of secondary displacement of distal radius fractures with cortical bone quality at the distal radius

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of patient characteristics, bone mineral density (BMD), bone microarchitecture and calculated bone strength with secondary displacement of a DRF based on radiographic alignment parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dorsal angulation, radial inclination and ulnar variance were assessed on conventional radiographs of a cohort of 251 patients, 38 men and 213 women, to determine the anatomic position of the DRF at presentation (primary position) and during follow-up. Secondary fracture displacement was assessed in the non-operatively treated patients (N = 154) with an acceptable position, preceded (N = 97) or not preceded (N = 57) by primary reduction (baseline position). Additionally, bone microarchitecture and calculated bone strength at the contralateral distal radius and tibia were assessed by HR-pQCT in a subset of, respectively, 63 and 71 patients.

OUTCOME

Characteristics of patients with and without secondary fracture displacement did not differ. In the model with adjustment for primary reduction [OR 22.00 (2.27-212.86), p = 0.008], total [OR 0.16 (95% CI 0.04-0.68), p = 0.013] and cortical [OR 0.19 (95% CI 0.05-0.80], p = 0.024] volumetric BMD (vBMD) and cortical thickness [OR 0.13 (95% CI 0.02-0.74), p = 0.021] at the distal radius were associated with secondary DRF displacement. No associations were found for other patient characteristics, such as age gender, BMD or prevalent vertebral fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our study indicates that besides primary reduction, cortical bone quality may be important for the risk of secondary displacement of DRFs.

The influence of gestational age, mode of delivery and abdominal wall closure method on the surgical outcome of neonates with uncomplicated gastroschisis

AIM OF THE STUDY

To evaluate if gestational age (GA), mode of delivery and abdominal wall closure method influence outcomes in uncomplicated gastroschisis (GTC).

METHODS

Retrospective review of NICU admissions for gastroschisis, August 2008-July 2016. Primary outcomes were: time to start enteral feeds (on-EF), time to discontinue parenteral nutrition (off-PN), and length of stay (LOS).

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 200 patients with GTC were admitted to our NICU. Patients initially operated elsewhere (n = 13) were excluded. Patients with medical/surgical complications (n = 62) were analyzed separately. The study included 125 cases of uncomplicated GTC. There were no statistically significant differences in the outcomes of patients born late preterm (34 0/7-36 6/7; n = 70) and term (n = 40): on-EF 19 (5-54) versus 17 (7-34) days (p = 0.29), off-PN 32 (12-101) versus 30 (16-52) days (p = 0.46) and LOS 40 (18-137) versus 37 (21-67) days (p = 0.29), respectively. Patients born before 34 weeks GA (n = 15) had significantly longer on-EF, off-PN and LOS times compared to late preterm patients: 26 (12-50) days (p = 0.01), 41 (20-105) days (p = 0.04) and 62 (34-150) days (p < 0.01), respectively. There were no significant differences in outcomes between patients delivered by C-section (n = 62) and patients delivered vaginally (n = 63): on-EF 20 (5-50) versus 19 (7-54) days (p = 0.72), off-PN 32 (12-78) versus 33 (15-105) days (p = 0.83), LOS 42 (18-150) versus 41 (18-139) days (p = 0.68), respectively. There were significant differences in outcomes between patients who underwent primary reduction (n = 37) and patients who had a silo (88): on-EF 15 (5-37) versus 22 (6-54) days (p < 0.01), off-PN 28 (12-52) versus 34 (15-105) days (p = 0.04), LOS 36 (18-72) versus 44 (21-150) days (p = 0.04), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, late preterm delivery did not affect outcomes compared to term delivery in uncomplicated GTC. Outcomes were also not influenced by the mode of delivery. Patients who underwent primary reduction had better outcomes than patients who underwent silo placement.