Significance of the acetylation phenotype and the therapeutic effect of procainamide

Glossary and tutorial of xenobiotic metabolism terms used during small molecule drug discovery and development (IUPAC Technical Report)

This project originated more than 15 years ago with the intent to produce a glossary of drug metabolism terms having definitions especially applicable for use by practicing medicinal chemists. A first-draft version underwent extensive beta-testing that, fortuitously, engaged international audiences in a wide range of disciplines involved in drug discovery and development. It became clear that the inclusion of information to enhance discussions among this mix of participants would be even more valuable. The present version retains a chemical structure theme while expanding tutorial comments that aim to bridge the various perspectives that may arise during interdisciplinary communications about a given term. This glossary is intended to be educational for early stage researchers, as well as useful for investigators at various levels who participate on today’s highly multidisciplinary, collaborative small molecule drug discovery teams.

The Clinical Significance of the Pharmacogenetics of Cardiovascular Medications

Inter-individual variability in the response to numerous drugs can be traced to a number of sources. One source of variability in drug response is the variability associated with the metabolic capacity of an individual. The component of metabolic capacity that will be the focus of this article is that determined by heredity. Pharmacogenetics is frequently referred to as the study of the effects of heredity on the disposition and response to medications. This article will review the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic significance of pharmacogenetics as it pertains to a select number of cardiovascular agents. The enzyme systems responsible for drug metabolism discussed in this article will be limited to the P-450IID6 and N-acetylation pathways. Given the extensive use of cardiovascular agents in clinical practice that are affected by this genetic polymorphism, it is important for the practicing pharmacist to be aware of this phenomenon and its implications. Hopefully, the knowledge gained from this article will help practicing pharmacists to appreciate the clinical significance of polymorphic drug metabolism and provide a basis for the application of this knowledge to a variety of practice settings.

Plasma concentrations of complement split product C3d and immune complexes after procainamide induced production of antinuclear antibodies

Seventeen patients treated with procainamide for cardiac ventricular arrhythmias were followed for up to 40 weeks. Immunological data as a clue to developing the systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-like syndrome was emphasized. Ten patients developed antinuclear antibodies (IgG or IgM), but no increase in the plasma concentration of the complement split product C3d or immune complexes, measured by two different methods, was demonstrated. This finding is in contrast to the high levels of both C3d and immune complexes in SLE. The discrepancy may be caused by a lack of immune complex mediated complement activation by the procainamide induced antibodies, or may be due to a difference in severity of disease. The acetylator phenotype of the patients was determined but due to the low frequency of fast acetylators no comparison of the immunological response of the two phenotypes could be done.

Genetically determined variability in acetylation and oxidation. Therapeutic implications

The clinical significance of two separate genetic polymorphisms which alter drug metabolism, acetylation and oxidation is discussed, and methods of phenotyping for both acetylator and polymorphic oxidation status are reviewed. Particular reference is made to the dapsone method, which provides a simple means of distinguishing fast and slow - and possibly intermediate - acetylators, and to the sparteine method which allows a clear separation of oxidation phenotypes. Although acetylation polymorphism has been known for some time, definite indications for phenotyping are few. It is doubtful whether acetylator phenotype makes a significant difference to the outcome in most isoniazid treatment regimens, and peripheral neuropathy from isoniazid in slow acetylators is easily overcome by pyridoxine administration. However, in comparison with rapid acetylators, slow acetylators receiving isoniazid have an increased susceptibility to phenytoin toxicity, and perhaps also to carbamazepine toxicity. It is also possible that rapid acetylators receiving isoniazid attain higher serum fluoride concentrations from enflurane and similar anaesthetics than do similarly treated slow acetylators. Thus, when drug interactions of these types are suspected, phenotyping for acetylator status may be advisable. If routine monitoring of serum procainamide and N-acetylprocainamide concentrations is practised, phenotyping of subjects prior to therapy with these agents should not be necessary. Although acetylator phenotype influences serum concentrations of hydralazine, when this drug is given in combination with other drugs acetylator phenotype has not been shown to influence the therapeutic response. Slow acetylator phenotype along with female gender and the presence of HLA-DR antigens appear to be risk factors in the development of hydralazine-induced systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Determination of acetylator phenotype may therefore help determine susceptibility to this adverse reaction. In the case of sulphasalazine, adult slow acetylators require a lower daily dose of the drug than fast acetylators in order to maintain ulcerative colitis in remission without significant side effects. It is therefore advisable to determine acetylator phenotype prior to sulphasalazine therapy. Work on the association of acetylation polymorphism with various disease states is also reviewed. It is possible that a higher incidence of bladder cancer is associated with slow acetylation phenotype - especially in individuals exposed to high levels of arylamines. The question as to whether idiopathic SLE is more common in slow acetylators remains unresolved. There appears to be no difference between fa

N-acetylprocainamide kinetics during intravenous infusions and subsequent oral doses in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular arrhythmias

The kinetics of N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA) were studied in 5 patients (all men, mean age = 62) with coronary artery disease and ventricular arrhythmias during loading infusions of 0.22-0.45 mg/kg/min, prolonged (19-48 hrs) intravenous infusions 2.5-5.2 mg/min, and in 4 of the patients, during subsequent oral doses 1.5-3 g every 8 hrs. Serum, concentrations of NAPA were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. The individual concentration-time profiles could, with one exception, be described by a two-compartment, open, kinetic model with apparent first-order elimination. The kinetic variables were: initial distribution volume (Vc) 0.20 +/- 0.11 l/kg (mean +/- SD); steady-state distribution volume (Vss) 1.58 +/- 0.55 l/kg; distributional clearance (Cle) 133 +/- 23 ml/(kg X hr); absorption rate constant (Ka) 0.354 +/- 0.173 hr-1; and fraction of dose reaching systemic circulation (F) 1.00 +/- 0.14. The data for one patient who had received increasing oral dosages of 1.5, 2, 2.5 and 3 g every 8 hours resulted in systematic underprediction of observed concentrations at the two highest oral dosing rates. This suggests the possibility of some degree of nonlinearity or time-dependent change in the kinetic behavior of NAPA. Only low concentrations of procainamide, less than 1 mg/L, were found at the end of the infusions.

Metabolites of cardiac antiarrhythmic drugs: their clinical role

Most antiarrhythmic drugs are extensively metabolized, and the accumulation of the metabolites of several of these drugs has been documented. In some cases, the steady-state plasma concentrations of metabolites are considerably greater than is the concentration of the parent drug. Several of these metabolites have been evaluated in animal models for antiarrhythmic activity and their potencies have been defined relative to the activity of their parent compound. Evaluations of activity are generally conducted in animal arrhythmia models, and very few metabolites of antiarrhythmic drugs have been evaluated directly in patients. However, from knowledge of antiarrhythmic activity in animals and the degree to which a metabolite accumulates in the plasma of patients, one can make qualitative judgments about its therapeutic role. Such judgments, however, need to be recognized as tenuous. Quantitative judgments require further information regarding the relationship between the parent drug and metabolite when present simultaneously in the myocardium. One must consider whether the effects of the parent drug and metabolite are additive, synergistic, or even antagonistic. The latter case is most possible with drug-metabolite pairs where the metabolite accumulates substantially, but does not have significant antiarrhythmic potency. Other considerations include noncardiac effects of the metabolites. As in the case of the mono-desethyl metabolite of lidocaine, the significance of its accumulation relates more to central nervous system side effects than to direct cardiac actions. The role of active metabolites also much be considered in regard to differences in the disposition kinetics between the parent drug and metabolite. The most obvious situation where this is important is in designing clinical drug evaluation protocols. As illustrated by the metabolites of encainide and lorcainide, the time course of accumulation and disappearance of the metabolites may be much longer than that of the parent drug. Clinical evaluations at steady state must take into account the time required to achieve steady-state concentrations of the metabolites as well. Similarly, after discontinuation of drug administration, the time required before washout is complete may be totally dependent on the kinetics of the metabolite, and not the parent drug. Variability in metabolic activity also needs to be considered. It has been shown with procainamide and encainide that genetic factors can influence the rate of production of active metabolites and consequently influence the clinical efficacy of these drugs. Another consideration that deserves attention is the question of drug interactions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Survey of the human acetylator polymorphism in spontaneous disorders

There is ample evidence that the human acetylator phenotypes are associated with drug induced phenomena. It is principally the slow acetylators who exhibit toxic adverse effects because of their relative inability to detoxify the original drug compounds. In rare instances, however, it is the rapid acetylators who are at a disadvantage. In the matter of association of spontaneous disease with either acetylator phenotype, there are two groups of disorders to consider. First, disorders in which carcinogenic amines are known to be an aetiological factor. This is because these amines are substrates for the polymorphic N-acetyltransferase activity and hence there is a possible rational basis for searching for an association. Secondly, other disorders where searches for associations are based more on hunches. In the first group there is a definite statistical association between cancer of the bladder and the slow acetylator phenotype. In prevalence studies the slow phenotype is 39% more associated with bladder cancer than is the rapid phenotype. On the basis of the evidence now available it is not possible to say whether this association is because slow acetylators develop the disease more frequently or whether they survive longer. In the second group the relevant studies show (1) a greatly increased prevalence of slow acetylators in Gilbert's disease; (2) a confirmed association between the rapid acetylator phenotype and diabetes; (3) a possible association between the rapid acetylator phenotype and breast cancer; (4) a possible association between the slow acetylator phenotype and leprosy in Chinese patients; (5) an earlier age of onset of thyrotoxicosis (Graves' disease) in slow acetylators than in rapid acetylators; (6) no evidence of an association between either phenotype and spontaneous systemic lupus erythematosus.

Significance of acetylator phenotype in pharmacokinetics and adverse effects of procainamide

The pharmacokinetics and development of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) during procainamide (PA) therapy were studied in 35 patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Sixteen of the subjects were rapid and 19 were slow acetylators. Twenty-six of them (13 rapid and 13 slow acetylators) received PA therapy (2.4g sustained-release PA X HCl daily in three doses) for at least 16 weeks. On maintenance therapy, rapid acetylators had insignificantly lower serum PA concentrations and slightly higher N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA) concentrations than slow acetylators. The unchanged PA fraction (PA/PA + NAPA) in the rapid acetylators was somewhat lower than in the slow acetylators. Rapid acetylators excreted more NAPA in urine than did slow acetylators (p less than 0.05), whereas the difference in PA excretion was not significant. More than 80% of the given drug was excreted as PA and NAPA. Spontaneous or exercise-induced arrhythmias were recorded in 6 rapid and 8 slow acetylators. ANAs (titre at least 20) appeared in 6 rapid and 8 slow acetylators. The mean time until ANA development in rapid acetylators was only marginally longer than in slow acetylators. The results suggest that acetylation phenotyping is not of great significance in predicting the development of ANAs during PA therapy.