Effect of the introduction of dietary sucrose on metabolic control in children and adolescents with type I diabetes

Physical Activity and Nutrition Interventions for Type 1 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Current evidence is lacking on physical activity and nutrition-based interventions focusing on the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and health-related quality of life among children. To assess the effects of physical activity interventions and nutrition-based interventions for children with T1DM.

METHODS

Data sources include the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, clinicaltrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, CINAHL through January 2022. Study selection includes randomized controlled trials of children aged 18 years and below with T1DM comparing either a physical activity intervention, a nutrition-based intervention, or hybrid physical activity and nutrition-based intervention with placebo or no-treatment control. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Primary outcomes were hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

Eighteen trials were included. Physical activity compared with the no-treatment group showed a lack of effect on HbA1c (mean difference = -0.58, 95% confidence interval -1.20 to 0.05; P value = .07). Nutrition-based intervention compared with no-treatment control for HbA1c level revealed a lack of effect (mean difference = -0.61, 95% confidence interval -1.48 to 0.26; P value = .17). Limitations include paucity of studies and low quality of evidence caused by the risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of significant evidence, the generally favorable results highlight the potential of such interventions in enhancing glycemic control and health-related quality of life. Additionally, promising results from a single physical activity-nutrition-based hybrid intervention in terms of glycemic control indicate the plausible effectiveness of a mixed intervention.

Food sources of fructose-containing sugars and glycaemic control: systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled intervention studies

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of different food sources of fructose-containing sugars on glycaemic control at different levels of energy control.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled intervention studies.

DATA SOURCES

Medine, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to 25 April 2018.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Controlled intervention studies of at least seven days' duration and assessing the effect of different food sources of fructose-containing sugars on glycaemic control in people with and without diabetes were included. Four study designs were prespecified on the basis of energy control: substitution studies (sugars in energy matched comparisons with other macronutrients), addition studies (excess energy from sugars added to diets), subtraction studies (energy from sugars subtracted from diets), and ad libitum studies (sugars freely replaced by other macronutrients without control for energy). Outcomes were glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, and fasting blood glucose insulin.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Four independent reviewers extracted relevant data and assessed risk of bias. Data were pooled by random effects models and overall certainty of the evidence assessed by the GRADE approach (grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation).

RESULTS

155 study comparisons (n=5086) were included. Total fructose-containing sugars had no harmful effect on any outcome in substitution or subtraction studies, with a decrease seen in HbA1c in substitution studies (mean difference -0.22% (95% confidence interval to -0.35% to -0.08%), -25.9 mmol/mol (-27.3 to -24.4)), but a harmful effect was seen on fasting insulin in addition studies (4.68 pmol/L (1.40 to 7.96)) and ad libitum studies (7.24 pmol/L (0.47 to 14.00)). There was interaction by food source, with specific food sources showing beneficial effects (fruit and fruit juice) or harmful effects (sweetened milk and mixed sources) in substitution studies and harmful effects (sugars-sweetened beverages and fruit juice) in addition studies on at least one outcome. Most of the evidence was low quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Energy control and food source appear to mediate the effect of fructose-containing sugars on glycaemic control. Although most food sources of these sugars (especially fruit) do not have a harmful effect in energy matched substitutions with other macronutrients, several food sources of fructose-containing sugars (especially sugars-sweetened beverages) adding excess energy to diets have harmful effects. However, certainty in these estimates is low, and more high quality randomised controlled trials are needed.

STUDY REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02716870).

The evidence for medical nutrition therapy for type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults

This article reviews the evidence and nutrition practice recommendations from the American Dietetic Association's nutrition practice guidelines for type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults. The research literature was reviewed to answer nutrition practice questions and resulted in 29 recommendations. Here, we present the recommendations and provide a comprehensive and systematic review of the evidence associated with their development. Major nutrition therapy factors reviewed are carbohydrate (intake, sucrose, non-nutritive sweeteners, glycemic index, and fiber), protein intake, cardiovascular disease, and weight management. Contributing factors to nutrition therapy reviewed are physical activity and glucose monitoring. Based on individualized nutrition therapy client/patient goals and lifestyle changes the client/patient is willing and able to make, registered dietitians can select appropriate interventions based on key recommendations that include consistency in day-to-day carbohydrate intake, adjusting insulin doses to match carbohydrate intake, substitution of sucrose-containing foods, usual protein intake, cardioprotective nutrition interventions, weight management strategies, regular physical activity, and use of self-monitored blood glucose data. The evidence is strong that medical nutrition therapy provided by registered dietitians is an effective and essential therapy in the management of diabetes.

The influence of dietary intake and meal pattern on blood glucose control in children and adolescents using intensive insulin treatment

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

We studied dietary factors and their association with blood glucose control in type 1 diabetic children and adolescents using intensive insulin treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 550 children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (age 2-19 years) recorded their diet for 4 days in pre-coded food diaries. Of the study group, 34% used insulin pumps, 43% used four or more injections and 16% three injections per day. HbA(1c) was related to targets of optimal blood glucose control defined by the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD).

RESULTS

Adolescents with optimal glucose control (HbA(1c) < or = 7.5%) had a lower intake of added sugar (7.7 vs 9.1% of energy intake, p = 0.004), a higher intake of fibre (19.3 vs 17.0 g/day, p = 0.01) and a higher intake of fruits and vegetables (257 vs 227 g/day, p = 0.04) than those with suboptimal metabolic control (HbA(1c) > 7.5%). Multiple regression analysis in adolescents showed that fibre and meal pattern were significantly associated with blood glucose control (effect fibre intake = -0.02, p = 0.04, effect having breakfast regularly = -0.89, p = 0.009). In children meal pattern was associated with blood glucose control (effect having dinner regularly = -0.66, p = 0.02, effect having supper regularly = -0.78, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

In diabetic adolescents both intake of fibre and having a regular meal pattern are associated with blood glucose control. Lower intake of added sugar and sugar-sweetened soft drinks and higher intake of fruits and vegetables are observed among those with optimal compared with those with suboptimal blood glucose control. Dietary guidance should be intensified during adolescence to improve dietary intake and blood glucose control.