The effects of the 5 HT2 antagonist ritanserin on blood pressure and serotonin-induced platelet aggregation in patients with untreated essential hypertension

Serotonin and blood pressure regulation

5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; serotonin) was discovered more than 60 years ago as a substance isolated from blood. The neural effects of 5-HT have been well investigated and understood, thanks in part to the pharmacological tools available to dissect the serotonergic system and the development of the frequently prescribed selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors. By contrast, our understanding of the role of 5-HT in the control and modification of blood pressure pales in comparison. Here we focus on the role of 5-HT in systemic blood pressure control. This review provides an in-depth study of the function and pharmacology of 5-HT in those tissues that can modify blood pressure (blood, vasculature, heart, adrenal gland, kidney, brain), with a focus on the autonomic nervous system that includes mechanisms of action and pharmacology of 5-HT within each system. We compare the change in blood pressure produced in different species by short- and long-term administration of 5-HT or selective serotonin receptor agonists. To further our understanding of the mechanisms through which 5-HT modifies blood pressure, we also describe the blood pressure effects of commonly used drugs that modify the actions of 5-HT. The pharmacology and physiological actions of 5-HT in modifying blood pressure are important, given its involvement in circulatory shock, orthostatic hypotension, serotonin syndrome and hypertension.

5-hydroxtryptamine receptors in systemic hypertension: an arterial focus

BACKGROUND

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]) was named for its isolation from blood serum (sero-) and ability to contract smooth muscle (-tonin). Thus, its relationship with the cardiovascular system began with its discovery.

AIMS

This review will focus on the effects of 5-HT and its receptors in the vasculature, with a focus on their involvement in high blood pressure (hypertension). Two seemingly contradictory bodies of evidence exist that make it difficult to assign any one function to 5-HT in vascular control of blood pressure.

RESULTS

 In vitro, 5-HT is an established vasoconstrictor, the effects of which are amplified in hypertension. By contrast, 5-HT (or its precursor 5-hydroxytryptophan) lowers blood pressure when given chronically in vivo. We will discuss ideas that might help us understand these differences, discuss relatively new pharmacology parameters (e.g. biased, inverse agonism) as they pertain to 5-HT receptors, and pose questions that are vital to answer so as to understand the role played by 5-HT in control of blood pressure, especially as it pertains to vascular function.

CONCLUSIONS

Our goal is to understand if the actions of 5-HT in hypertension are physiologically and clinically relevant. The community understands 5-HT has complex cardiovascular effects, and clinical studies have proven equivocal in terms of the involvement of 5-HT. This article provides a balanced view of evidence/literature that illustrates involvement of 5-HT in hypertension as controversial. It contributes new pharmacological knowledge of 5-HT compounds, and poses timely questions as to how this field can move forward. The take home message is that the cardiovascular effects of 5-HT are markedly complex such that we have not yet answered the question of whether 5-HT is beneficial or detrimental to hypertension.

A multi-hit endocrine model of intrinsic adult-onset asthma

Epidemiological studies indicate that adult-onset asthma is initiated by stress (anxiety and depression), obesity and menopause. Ironically, despite our understanding of the various stressors that promote chronic adult-onset asthma, most of which are known to elevate cortisol production via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, inhaled and systemic corticosteroids are the mainstay for the treatment of chronic asthma. This implicates other endocrine or cellular changes independent of cortisol synthesis in non-allergic adult-onset asthma. The mechanism by which corticosteroids are thought to modulate bronchial tone in relieving asthma is via corticosteroid-responsive genes that increase PGE(2) and cAMP production which promote muscle relaxation. Therefore, any physiological condition that suppresses intracellular PGE(2) and cAMP production would counter cortisol-induced muscle relaxation and potentially trigger non-allergic adult-onset asthma. Stress, obesity and menopause act on three interrelated endocrine pathways, the serotonergic, leptinergic and hypothalamic pathways, all of which operate through receptors to modulate cAMP and Ca(2+) metabolism in smooth muscle cells (SMCs). We propose that the level of SMC cAMP, as determined by overall signaling through corticosteroid receptors, leptin receptors and the GPCRs of the HPG and serotonergic pathways, will regulate bronchial tone (i.e. the 'Multi-Hit Endocrine Model of Adult-Onset Asthma'). Thus, decreases in HPG (menopause) and serotonergic (depression) signaling and increases in leptinergic (obesity) signaling relative to HPA signaling would decrease cellular SMC cAMP and promote muscle contraction. This model can explain the discrepant epidemiological data associating stress, obesity, depression and menopause with adult-onset asthma and is supported by basic and clinical data. Treatment of depressed or menopausal asthmatics with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or hormone replacement therapy, respectively, alleviates bronchoconstriction. Future therapeutic strategies might therefore target the serotonergic, leptinergic and hypothalamic pathways in regulating cellular cAMP production and bronchoconstriction for the treatment of adult-onset asthma.

5-HT in systemic hypertension: foe, friend or fantasy?

Since its discovery by Erspamer in the 1930s and identification by Page in the 1950s, 5-HT (5-hydroxytryptamine; serotonin) has been an elusive candidate as a substance that plays a role in the disease of high blood pressure, also known as hypertension. In both animal and human hypertension, arterial contraction to 5-HT is profoundly enhanced. Additionally, 5-HT is a vascular smooth muscle cell mitogen. Because both increased arterial contractility and smooth muscle growth contribute to the disease of hypertension, it is logical to believe that 5-HT is a potential cause of disease, and thus a foe. However, decades of research have produced conflicting results as to the potential role of 5-HT in hypertension. This review will discuss historical findings which both support and refute the involvement of 5-HT in hypertension, and pose some new questions that may reveal novel ways for 5-HT to modify vascular control of blood pressure.

Influence of alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonism of ketanserin on the nature of its 5-HT2 receptor antagonism

1. In order to investigate alpha 1-adrenoceptor interactions with 5-HT2 receptors, the effect of ketanserin (which antagonizes both types of the above receptors) on responses to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and phenylephrine (PE) was measured in isolated perfused rat tail arteries. 2. Ketanserin was found to be a competitive antagonist at 5-HT2 receptors (pA2 = 9.19) and alpha 1-adrenoceptors (pA2 = 7.52). 3. Ritanserin, an analogue of ketanserin with very weak alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist activity, was found to be a potent non-competitive 5-HT2 receptor antagonist. 4. In the presence of the potent alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin, ketanserin was a non-competitive 5-HT2 receptor antagonist. 5. Thus, for ketanserin to exhibit competitive 5-HT2 receptor antagonism, its coexisting alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist property appears mandatory.

Does a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonist (ICI 169, 369) lower blood pressure in hypertensive patients?

1. The effect of single doses (10, 30 and 50 mg) of a selective 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, ICI 169, 369, on blood pressure, heart rate and the electrocardiogram was studied using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, within subject design in hypertensive patients. 2. ICI 169, 369 did not reduce blood pressure or increase QT interval as has been reported with ketanserin. This suggests that it is the other properties of ketanserin which are responsible for its antihypertensive effect. 3. Plasma concentrations of AUC for ICI 169, 369 were low. This is consistent with low bioavailability due to extensive first pass metabolism. 4. ICI 169, 369 was well tolerated and none of the symptoms reported by the patients was thought to be drug related.

Comparative haemodynamic effects of ketanserin and ritanserin in the proximal and distal upper limb circulations of hypertensive patients

The effects of ketanserin (40 mg p.o.) on blood pressure and brachial haemodynamics (brachial artery diameter, brachial blood velocity and blood flow) have been compared in a double-blind study with those of ritanserin (10 mg p.o.) and placebo. Haemodynamic parameters were measured before and 1 h after treatment. Patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension participated in this study, 6 each on ketanserin, ritanserin and placebo. Placebo significantly reduced heart rate and did not modify the other parameters. Compared to placebo, ketanserin significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure, increased brachial blood velocity and flow, and decreased forearm vascular resistance. Compared to placebo, ritanserin slightly decreased blood pressure and slightly increased blood flow, but neither effect was significant. When blood circulation to the hand was excluded, neither ketanserin nor ritanserin modified the proximal arterial resistance or blood flow. It is concluded that the actions of ketanserin and ritanserin essentially occurred in the distal part of the upper limb, and alpha 1-receptor blockade is probably involved.