Effects of low and moderate doses of chlorpromazine on discrimination learning in the rat

DARPP-32 knockout mice exhibit impaired reversal learning in a discriminated operant task

The current study was conducted to examine the performance of mice with a targeted deletion of the gene for DARPP-32 in a discriminated operant task using food reinforcement. DARPP-32 plays a central role in regulating the efficacy of dopaminergic neurotransmission. Initially, wild-type and DARPP-32 knockout mice were trained to nose-poke for food on a continuous reinforcement schedule. The minimum response requirement was increased every 5 days until the animals were responding on an FR-15 schedule of reinforcement. At the completion of extensive operant training, reversal learning was assessed. Wild-type and DARPP-32 knockout mice exhibited equivalent performance during acquisition of this task, with both groups increasing operant responding as the schedule of reinforcement was raised. However, significant differences in discrimination learning were observed during the reversal phase, with DARPP-32 knockout mice requiring significantly more trials to reach criterion than wild-type controls. These results provide evidence for a functional role of DARPP-32 in the mediation of processes underlying learning and memory.

The involvement of nucleus accumbens dopamine in appetitive and aversive motivation

In recent years, considerable emphasis has been placed upon the putative role of nucleus accumbens dopamine systems in appetitive motivation and positive reinforcement. However, considerable evidence indicates that brain dopamine in general, and nucleus accumbens dopamine in particular, is involved in aspects of aversive motivation. Administration of dopamine antagonists or localized interference with nucleus accumbens dopamine systems has been shown to disrupt active avoidance behavior. In addition, accumbens dopamine release and metabolism is activated by a wide variety of stressful conditions. A review of the literature indicates that there are substantial similarities between the characteristics of dopaminergic involvement in appetitive and aversive motivation. There is conflicting evidence about the role of dopamine in emotion, and little evidence to suggest that the profound and consistent changes in instrumental behavior produced by interference with DA systems are due to direct dopaminergic mediation of positive affective responses such as hedonia. It is suggested that nucleus accumbens dopamine is involved in aspects of sensorimotor functions that are involved in both appetitive and aversive motivation.

Acute effects of chlorpromazine in a monkey operant behavioral test battery

The effects of acute chlorpromazine treatment were assessed using a complex operant test battery (OTB) containing five tasks thought to depend upon processes associated with short-term memory and attention [delayed-matching-to-sample (DMTS)], color and position discrimination [conditioned position responding (CPR)], motivation [progressive ratio (PR)], time perception [temporal response differentiation (TRD)], and learning [incremental repeated acquisition (IRA)]. Adult male rhesus monkeys were tested 15 min after IV injection of saline or chlorpromazine (0.010, 0.030, 0.100, or 0.175 mg/kg). Behavioral endpoints measured included percent task completed, response rate or latency, and response accuracy. The order of task sensitivity to disruption by chlorpromazine was TRD = PR = IRA = DMTS = CPR in which sensitivity was defined as a significant alteration in any aspect of task performance. Chlorpromazine slowed response rates in all tasks except TRD but did decrease accuracy in that task. These effects were similar to those noted in previous studies of acute chlorpromazine treatment. Specific motoric effects suggested decreased task initiation at doses that left general motor ability intact. This finding is similar to that noted in parkinsonism caused by chronic chlorpromazine treatment.

The effects of chlorpromazine and lithium on appetitive discrimination learning in the rat

Rats learned one of two appetitive discrimination tasks varying in terms of cognitive difficulty. Contrary to previous reports showing an impairment in the acquisition of avoidance tasks under the effects of either chlorpromazine (CPZ) or lithium, the results of this experiment indicate that neither drug retards the acquisition of appetitive tasks. Instead, at the highest doses used (2 and 3 mg/kg), CPZ decreased the number of trials required for the difficult task. Rats administered CPZ had longer reaction times than rats administered placebo, and therefore might have achieved criterion earlier because they spent more time in front of and on the discriminanda. The contrary results reported with avoidance tests concerning the effects of CPZ are explained in terms of the anxiety-reducing properties of CPZ, which might reduce drive without impairing cognitive ability.

Effects of chlorpromazine and imipramine on discrimination learning, consolidation, and learned behavior in two inbred strains of mice

Chlorpromazine and imipramine were administered to DBA/2J and C57BL/6J mice swimming in a Y water maze toward a light source (L Procedure, corresponding to innate tendency) or towards the dark (D Procedure, corresponding to the acquisition of a new pattern of behavior). In two sets of experiments the drugs were administered to naive mice before and after each training session, respectively. In both strains, in the pretrial experiments, the innate tendencies were improved by both drugs; the acquisition of a new pattern of behavior was improved following imipramine but impaired following chlorpromazine. In the posttrial experiments (D procedure) the consolidation processes of both strains were improved following imipramine and impaired following chlorpromazine. In a third set of experiments imipramine was administered to previously trained mice of both strains and chlorpromazine to previously trained C57 mice. In both procedures the administration of increasing doses of both drugs was followed by a progressive lenghtening of the swimming times in the previously trained C57 mice; performance disruptions were evident in both procedures in trained DBA mice mice following imipramine.