Reactions of dysmenorrheic and nondysmenorrheic women to experimentally induced pain throughout the menstrual cycle

Myofascial Pain Syndrome in Women with Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Case-Control Study

There is limited information on myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) and specific symptoms of chronic pelvic pain and, more specifically, dysmenorrhea. The objective of this study was to determine whether patients suffering from primary dysmenorrhea present alterations in mechanosensitivity and pain patterns, and greater presence of MTrPs in the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles. A case-control study was carried out with a total sample of 84 participants distributed based on primary dysmenorrhea and contraceptive treatment. The sample was divided into four groups each comprising 21 women. Data on pain, quality of life, and productivity and work absenteeism were collected; three assessments were made in different phases of the menstrual cycle, to report data on pressure pain threshold, MTrP presence, and referred pain areas. One-way ANOVA tests showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) between the groups, for the Physical Health domain and the total score of the SF-12 questionnaire, and for all the domains of the McGill questionnaire; but no significant differences were found in the data from the WPAI-GH questionnaire. Statistically significant data (p < 0.01) were found for mechanosensitivity in the abdominal area and limbs, but not for the lumbar assessment, within the group, with very few significant intergroup differences. The frequency of active MTrPs is higher in the groups of women with primary dysmenorrhea and during the menstrual phase, with the prevalence of myofascial trigger points of the iliococcygeus muscle being especially high in all examination groups (>50%) and higher than 70% in women with primary dysmenorrhea, in the menstrual phase, and the internal obturator muscle (100%) in the menstrual phase. Referred pain areas of the pelvic floor muscles increase in women with primary dysmenorrhea.

Are menstrual symptoms associated with central sensitization inventory? A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Dysmenorrhea is a prevalent pain condition that affects women of reproductive age, who are monthly exposed to this pain, usually until they reach the adult age, or even after that, which can predispose them to Central Sensitization. The present study aimed to observe the association between menstrual characteristics and central sensitivity symptoms in women.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study. Brazilian women (n=10,402) answered an online form comprised of questions regarding their gynecological history, the Numerical Rating Scale for pain and the Central Sensitization Inventory, part A. For the analysis, we separated women into two groups: Central Sensitivity Symptoms group (n=5,200) and No-Central Sensitivity Symptoms group (n=5,202). We performed a binary logistic regression with the backward insertion method for the variables with p<0.05 in the bivariate analysis between groups. The significance level was set at 5%.

RESULTS

Prevalence of dysmenorrhea was 67.3%, and 32.2% of women in the Central Sensitivity Symptoms group reported pain >8 during their menstrual period. The logistic regression showed that greater levels of menstrual pain (Odds Ratio 1.12), gynecological diseases (Odds Ratio 1.51), presence of dysmenorrhea since adolescence (Odds Ratio 1.20) and irregular menstrual cycles (Odds Ratio 1.47) increased the likelihood of women presenting with Central Sensitivity Symptoms (p<0.05 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that Central Sensitivity Symptoms are present in about 50% of women and are associated with menstrual characteristics such as dysmenorrhea-related pain intensity, cycle regularity, presence of dysmenorrhea since adolescence accompanied by gynecological diseases.

SIGNIFICANCE

Central sensitivity symptoms occur in 50% of women, and are more present in women with dysmenorrhea. They are associated with cycle regularity, presence of dysmenorrhea since adolescence, and gynecological diseases.

LIMITATIONS

Women that suffer from dysmenorrhea and of higher socioeconomic and educational levels may have been more propense to respond to the invitation; as such, the findings of the present study should be carefully interpreted.

Personal influencing factors for pressure pain threshold in healthy people: A systematic review and meta-analysis

All studies that investigated personal factors influencing pressure pain threshold (PPT) in healthy people were synthesized. Data was summarized, and risk of bias (RoB) and level of evidence were determined. Results were pooled per influencing factor, grouped by body region and included in meta-analyses. Fifty-four studies were eligible. Five had low, nine moderate, and 40 high RoB. Following meta-analyses, a strong conclusion was found for the influence of scapular position, a moderate for the influence of gender, and a weak for the influence of age (shoulder/arm region) and blood pressure on PPT. In addition, body mass index, gender (leg region), alcohol consumption and pain vigilance may not influence PPT. Based on qualitative summary, depression and menopause may not influence PPT. For other variables there was only preliminary or conflicting evidence. However, caution is advised, since the majority of included studies showed a high RoB and several were not eligible to include in meta-analyses. Heterogeneity was high in the performed meta-analyses, and most conclusions were weak. More standardized research is necessary.

Dysmenorrhea subtypes exhibit differential quantitative sensory assessment profiles

Women who develop bladder pain syndrome (BPS), irritable bowel syndrome, or dyspareunia frequently have an antecedent history of dysmenorrhea. Despite the high prevalence of menstrual pain, its role in chronic pelvic pain emergence remains understudied. We systematically characterized bladder, body, and vaginal mechanical sensitivity with quantitative sensory testing in women with dysmenorrhea (DYS, n = 147), healthy controls (HCs) (n = 37), and women with BPS (n = 25). Previously, we have shown that a noninvasive, bladder-filling task identified a subset of women with both dysmenorrhea and silent bladder pain hypersensitivity, and we repeated this to subtype dysmenorrhea sufferers in this study (DYSB; n = 49). DYS, DYSB, and BPS participants had lower vaginal mechanical thresholds and reported more pain to a cold stimulus during a conditioned pain modulation task and greater pelvic examination after-pain than HCs (P's < 0.05). DYSB participants also had reduced body mechanical thresholds and less conditioned pain modulation compared to HCs and DYS participants (P's < 0.05). Comparing quantitative sensory testing results among the DYS and HC groups only, provoked bladder pain was the only significant predictor of self-reported menstrual pain (r = 0.26), bladder pain (r = 0.57), dyspareunia (r = 0.39), and bowel pain (r = 0.45). Our findings of widespread sensory sensitivity in women with dysmenorrhea and provoked bladder pain, much like that observed in chronic pain, suggest a need to study the trajectory of altered mechanisms of pain processing in preclinical silent visceral pain phenotypes to understand which features convey inexorable vs modifiable risk.

Pain in Women: A Perspective Review on a Relevant Clinical Issue that Deserves Prioritization

Introduction

Gender equity and gender medicine are opportunities not to be missed, and this Expert Group Opinion Paper on pain in women aims to review the treatment of pain conditions mainly affecting women, as well as the fundamental aspects of the different clinical response to drug treatment between the genders, and what can be done for gender-specific rehabilitation.

Methods

Perspective review.

Results

Genotypic and phenotypic differences in pain between the sexes are conditioned by anatomical, physiological, neural, hormonal, psychological, social, and cultural factors, such as the response to pharmacological treatment to control pain. The examination of these factors shows that women are affected by pain diseases more frequently and severely than men and that they report pain more frequently and with a lower pain threshold than men. Some forms of pain are inherently related to gender differences, such as pain related to the genitourinary system. However, other forms of chronic pain are seen more frequently in women than men, such as migraine, rheumatological, and musculoskeletal pain, in particular fibromyalgia.

Discussion

Research is needed into the pathophysiological basis for gender differences in the generation of acute pain and maintenance of chronic pain, including the factors that put women at higher risk for developing chronic pain. In addition, different specialties need to collaborate to develop gender-related diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines, and healthcare professionals need to upskill themselves in the appropriate management of pain using existing diagnostic tools and therapeutic options.

Experimental evaluation of central pain processes in young women with primary dysmenorrhea

Primary dysmenorrhea (PD; menstrual pain without an underlying medical condition) is associated with enhanced pain sensitivity and temporal summation (TS) in adult women, which may reflect the presence of central pain processes. Research in this area has been limited by focusing on only adult populations and incomplete assessments of central sensitization. The current study explored both excitatory and inhibitory measures of pain processing in girls and young adult women with and without PD. Thirty-two young women with PD and 34 healthy controls underwent laboratory pain testing during each of 3 menstrual cycle phases (menstrual, ovulatory, and midluteal), which included measures of pain tolerance and threshold, TS, and conditioned pain modulation. Results indicated enhanced pain sensitivity in young women with PD as measured by heat pain tolerance and Average Pain50 (P50), compared with healthy controls. These group differences were evident at all phases of the menstrual cycle. No group differences in cold pain tolerance, TS, or conditioned pain modulation were evident at any phase of the menstrual cycle. These data suggest some evidence of central sensitization in young women with PD, although no evidence of enhanced excitatory or deficient inhibitory mechanisms were observed. Future research should focus on identifying other potential phenotypes for PD to determine those at risk of developing other pain problems.

Behavioural and neural responses to aversive visceral stimuli in women with primary dysmenorrhoea

BACKGROUND

Chronic pelvic pain, in particular dysmenorrhoea, is a significant yet unresolved healthcare problem in gynaecology. As interoceptive sensitivity and underlying neural mechanisms remain incompletely understood, this functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study assessed behavioural and neural responses to visceral stimuli in primary dysmenorrhoea (PMD).

METHODS

Women with PMD (N = 19) without psychological comorbidity and healthy women (N = 20) were compared with respect to visceral sensory and pain thresholds, and to neural responses to individually calibrated mildly painful and painful rectal distensions implemented during scanning. Trial-by-trial ratings of perceived intensity were accomplished with visual analogue scales (VAS).

RESULTS

Although women with dysmenorrhoea reported significantly higher chronic pain intensity and pain interference with daily life activities (p < 0.01, assessed with the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory), there were no differences between groups in visceral sensitivity and mean trial-by-trial VAS ratings were virtually identical. Analysis of neural responses revealed activation in brain regions previously shown to be involved in the processing of visceral stimuli with differences between painful and mildly painful stimulation, but no group differences were found even when using a liberal statistical threshold.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysmenorrhoea patients show unaltered perceptual and neural responses to experimental interoceptive stimuli. Despite limited sample size, these negative results argue against a generalized sensitization towards interoceptive stimuli in patients without psychological comorbidities. Future studies should clarify the role of psychosocial factors in central sensitization using more pain region-specific models in larger and clinically more heterogeneous samples.

SIGNIFICANCE

Despite higher chronic pain and pain interference with daily life activities, women with primary dysmenorrhoea do not differ from healthy women with respect to visceral sensitivity or neural processing of aversive interoceptive stimuli induced by rectal distensions. Generalized sensitization may be present only in subgroups with pronounced psychosocial or psychiatric disturbances.

Experimental and procedural pain responses in primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review

Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) has been the focus of a number of experimental pain studies. Although a number of reviews exist, few have critically evaluated the existing body of research on PD and experimental and procedural pain. Data from 19 published research articles that include women with PD and responses to an experimental or procedural pain stimulus (or stimuli) suggest that women with PD may have elevated pain reactivity, as compared to women without PD. This pattern appears to be true across different phases of the menstrual cycle. However, there is an abundance of conflicting findings, which may be due to significant methodological issues such as inconsistent definitions of PD, wide variation in experimental pain methodologies, and inaccurate assessment of the menstrual cycle. Future research should focus on identifying specific symptoms (i.e., pain threshold ratings) to more clearly define what constitutes PD, establish reliable and valid laboratory testing protocols, and assess the menstrual cycle with greater precision.

Effect of Age, Sex and Gender on Pain Sensitivity: A Narrative Review

Introduction:

An increasing body of literature on sex and gender differences in pain sensitivity has been accumulated in recent years. There is also evidence from epidemiological research that painful conditions are more prevalent in older people. The aim of this narrative review is to critically appraise the relevant literature investigating the presence of age and sex differences in clinical and experimental pain conditions.

Methods:

A scoping search of the literature identifying relevant peer reviewed articles was conducted on May 2016. Information and evidence from the key articles were narratively described and data was quantitatively synthesised to identify gaps of knowledge in the research literature concerning age and sex differences in pain responses.

Results:

This critical appraisal of the literature suggests that the results of the experimental and clinical studies regarding age and sex differences in pain contain some contradictions as far as age differences in pain are concerned. While data from the clinical studies are more consistent and seem to point towards the fact that chronic pain prevalence increases in the elderly findings from the experimental studies on the other hand were inconsistent, with pain threshold increasing with age in some studies and decreasing with age in others.

Conclusion:

There is a need for further research using the latest advanced quantitative sensory testing protocols to measure the function of small nerve fibres that are involved in nociception and pain sensitivity across the human life span.

Implications:

Findings from these studies should feed into and inform evidence emerging from other types of studies (e.g. brain imaging technique and psychometrics) suggesting that pain in the older humans may have unique characteristics that affect how old patients respond to intervention.

Association of brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene Val66Met polymorphism with primary dysmenorrhea

Primary dysmenorrhea (PDM), the most prevalent menstrual cycle-related problem in women of reproductive age, is associated with negative moods. Whether the menstrual pain and negative moods have a genetic basis remains unknown. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays a key role in the production of central sensitization and contributes to chronic pain conditions. BDNF has also been implicated in stress-related mood disorders. We screened and genotyped the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism (rs6265) in 99 Taiwanese (Asian) PDMs (20–30 years old) and 101 age-matched healthy female controls. We found that there was a significantly higher frequency of the Met allele of the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in the PDM group. Furthermore, BDNF Met/Met homozygosity had a significantly stronger association with PDM compared with Val carrier status. Subsequent behavioral/hormonal assessments of sub-groups (PDMs = 78, controls = 81; eligible for longitudinal multimodal neuroimaging battery studies) revealed that the BDNF Met/Met homozygous PDMs exhibited a higher menstrual pain score (sensory dimension) and a more anxious mood than the Val carrier PDMs during the menstrual phase. Although preliminary, our study suggests that the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism is associated with PDM in Taiwanese (Asian) people, and BDNF Met/Met homozygosity may be associated with an increased risk of PDM. Our data also suggest the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism as a possible regulator of menstrual pain and pain-related emotions in PDM. Absence of thermal hypersensitivity may connote an ethnic attribution. The presentation of our findings calls for further genetic and neuroscientific investigations of PDM.

Evaluation of sensitivity, motor and pain thresholds across the menstrual cycle through medium-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify variations in nervous thresholds in different phases of the menstrual cycle in eumenorrheic women and users of oral contraceptives.

METHOD

An observational study was performed including 56 volunteers, consisting of 30 eumenorrheic women who were non-users of oral contraceptives and 26 users of oral contraceptives. An electrical stimulator was employed to assess their nervous thresholds, with pulses applied at a fixed frequency of 2,500 Hz, modulated at 50 Hz, with phase variances of 20 μs, 50 μs and 100 μs. Sensitivity, motor and pain thresholds were evaluated during five menstrual cycle phases: phase 1 - menstrual, phase 2 - follicular, phase 3 - ovulatory, phase 4 - luteal and phase 5 - premenstrual.

RESULTS

The results indicated low sensitivity thresholds of 100 μs for non-users of oral contraceptives and 50 μs for oral contraceptive users in phase 5. Low motor thresholds of 20 μs, 50 μs and 100 μs were observed for non-users of oral contraceptives in phase 5, while that of oral contraceptive users was 100 μs. Finally, a low pain threshold of 100 μs was observed in phase 5, but only in the oral contraceptive group.

CONCLUSION

Nervous thresholds vary systematically across the phases of the menstrual cycle, with or without the use of oral contraceptives. These variations should be taken into account during research performed in women.

Comparing pain sensitivity and the nociceptive flexion reflex threshold across the mid-follicular and late-luteal menstrual phases in healthy women

OBJECTIVES

Understanding the relationship between the menstrual cycle and pain can contribute significantly to our knowledge of pain processing in women. Many early studies suggested that pain sensitivity was enhanced during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle relative to the follicular phase; however, these studies were often limited by small sample sizes, lack of ovulation verification, focus on a single pain modality, inadequate assessment of menstrual cycle regularity, and low-powered statistical methods. The current study was designed to address these limitations and examine the difference in pain processing between the mid-follicular (days 5 to 8) and late-luteal (days 1 to 6 preceding menses) phases.

METHODS

Forty-one healthy, regularly cycling women attended testing sessions that measured pain sensitivity from mechanical pain threshold, electrocutaneous pain threshold/tolerance, and ischemia pain threshold/tolerance, as well as McGill Pain Questionnaire qsensory and affective ratings of electric and ischemic stimuli. Electrocutaneous stimulation was also used to assess nociceptive flexion reflex threshold, a physiological measure of spinal nociception.

RESULTS

When analyses were limited to data collected only in the targeted menstrual phases (N=30), results indicated no menstrual phase effect on any pain outcome (all P's>0.05), with the exception of lower electrocutaneous pain thresholds during the late-luteal phase. No outcomes differed by menstrual phase in the full sample (N=41). This indicates nociceptive responding varies little between the mid-follicular and late-luteal phases.

DISCUSSION

The present study suggests that experimental pain processing does not significantly differ between the mid-follicular and late-luteal phases of the menstrual cycle in healthy women. This implies hormonal variation across these 2 phases (ie, progesterone) has a minimal effect on subjective and physiological responses to pain.

Pain catastrophizing changes during the menstrual cycle

Pain catastrophizing is an important predictor of pain intensity and pain-related outcomes. Many studies have shown that the level of this phenomenon is higher in women compared to men. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a difference in pain catastrophizing in women during the different phases of their menstrual cycle and whether there is a difference in pain catastrophizing depending on the history of childbirth and dysmenorrhea. A prospective study was conducted among 149 healthy women aged 18-35, with a regular menstrual cycle, 80 of which were nulliparous. The participants filled a sociodemographic questionnaire at the enrollment and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale on the 1st, 12th, and 20th day of the menstrual cycle. Pain catastrophizing scores, including all the subscales, significantly varied throughout the menstrual cycle, being highest on the first day of menstrual cycle and declining subsequently. Pain catastrophizing scores were higher in nulliparous than in parous women. Higher pain catastrophizing scores on the first day of the menstrual cycle were found in dysmehorrhoic women and women who regularly use analgesics for dysmenorrhea. Knowing that pain catastrophizing varies throughout the menstrual cycle may help in creating interventions for pain prevention and treatment in cycling women.

Methods for studying naturally occurring human pain and their analogues

Methods for investigating human pain have been developed over the last 100years. Typically, researchers focus on people with clinical pain, or on healthy participants undergoing laboratory-controlled pain-induction techniques focussed mostly on exogenously generated skin nociception. Less commonly investigated are acute pain experiences that emerge naturally. Six common painful complaints were identified: headache, muscular pain, visceral pain, menstrual pain, dental pain, and pain associated with upper respiratory tract infection. Methods used to recruit participants with the natural occurrence of each pain complaint were identified, and features of their use reviewed. Also reviewed were experimental analogues designed to mimic these pains, with the exception of menstrual pain. Headache and menstrual pain appear to be most effectively researched in their naturally occurring form, whereas muscle and dental pain may be more easily induced. Upper respiratory tract infection and abdominal pain provide further challenges for researchers. Summary guidance is offered, and directions for methods development outlined.

Sex differences and hormonal influences on response to mechanical pressure pain in humans

Previous studies have demonstrated that sex differences in pain responsivity can be detected using various models of experimentally induced pain. The present study employed the mechanical pressure test in order to examine potential differences in pain report among men, normally menstruating women (NMW), and women taking monophasic oral contraceptives (OCW). Testing occurred during 5 phases of the menstrual cycle (menstrual, follicular, ovulatory, luteal, and late luteal) and all participants completed 10 sessions (2 sessions per phase). Menstrual-cycle phase was estimated for OCW based on their first day of menses. Men were tested at time points that roughly corresponded to the intervals during which the different phases occurred in NMW. During the mechanical pressure test, 4 different weights were placed on the fingers, one at a time, and ratings of pain were recorded for 30 seconds. The statistical decision-making model and a forced-choice procedure were used to analyze the response data. Two variables, based on signal detection theory, were thus generated: P(A), a measure of sensory pain, and B, a measure of response bias. P(A) is believed to be a measure of pain sensitivity while B measures stoicism. NMW tended to report lower P(A) values, indicating reduced ability to discriminate among different stimulus intensities, during the menstrual and late luteal phases compared to the luteal phase. OCW reported lower B values, indicating less stoicism, during the menstrual compared to the follicular and ovulatory phases. Men tended to have significantly lower B values than OCW, but not NMW. These results demonstrate subtle menstrual-cycle effects in NMW and OCW. Sex differences were few, with more group differences and trends emerging between OCW and men, as opposed to men and NMW.

PERSPECTIVE

The lack of consistent differences between men and NMW underscores the subtle impact of sex and hormonal changes in pain report. In addition, the data obtained in NMW support the notion that changes in hormone levels during the menstrual cycle can lead to changes in pain responsivity as NMW had trends for better discrimination in menstrual phases when estradiol levels were highest.

Craniomandibular pain, bite force, and oral health-related quality of life in patients with jaw resection

The present study evaluated the connection between temporomandibular disorders (TMD), maximum voluntary bite force and oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) in patients with oral cancer. Twenty-six prosthetically rehabilitated patients with partial resection of the upper and/or lower jaw with segmental mandibulectomy, with and without reconstruction, were examined. The examination comprised the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD), determination of the individual pain threshold, evaluation of the maximum voluntary bite force, and OHRQoL according to the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) questionnaire. Male pain thresholds were significantly higher than female pain thresholds (P=0.003). Patients with maxillary resection showed higher pain threshold values than patients with (segmental) mandibulectomy. Bite force was significantly (P=0.000014) lower in resected jaw areas than in healthy ones. Patients with resections of the maxilla showed higher voluntary bite forces than patients with resections of the mandible; males showed higher bite forces than females. The prevalence of negative responses ("often"-2 and "very often"-1) on the OHIP items was 10.39%, whereas the prevalence of positive responses ("from time to time"-3, "seldom"-4, and "never"-5) was 89.60%. The prevalence for negative responses was 2.46% in male patients and 8.07% in female patients. Patients with resections in the maxilla suffered from negative responses of 3.92%, patients with resection of the mandible of 6.64%. According to the OHIP, the psychological disposition of these patients clearly referred to coping mechanisms.

Sensitization of the trigeminal sensory system during different stages of the rat estrous cycle: implications for menstrual migraine

OBJECTIVES

To determine if the sensitization of the trigeminal system changes after dural activation of the trigeminal nerve during different stages of the rat estrous cycle.

BACKGROUND

The specific mechanisms through which ovarian hormones trigger menstrual migraine are currently unknown. Past animal studies have suggested that the response properties of the trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) may change during the different phases of the rat estrous cycle, but none have been performed in an experimental paradigm for migraine headache.

METHODS

Sixty-one cycling female Sprague-Dawley rats were used for these experiments. The stage of the estrous cycle of each animal was identified by examination of the cellular morphology of vaginal lavage. The animals were anesthetized and a 7 mm portion of the skull was removed that was centered over the sagittal sinus. A tungsten electrode was used to record from neurons in the TNC or CI-CIII regions. Only neurons that had both dural and cutaneous receptive fields were used for these experiments. Facial receptive field sizes (RFS) were mapped and neurophysiologic response properties of the TNC/CI-CIII neurons to cutaneous and dural stimuli was ascertained before and after application of capsaicin to the dura. One-way and repeated measure analysis of variance were used to compare changes in RFS and response properties of TNC/CI-CIII neurons from animals during different stages of the rat estrous cycle.

RESULTS

When data were analyzed individually for each stage, there was greater enlargement of cutaneous receptive fields and enhanced sensitivity of the trigeminal system to cutaneous stimuli during proestrus as compared to metestrus and diestrus after dural activation with capsaicin (P values <.05). When data were pooled from stages with similar hormonal milieus, the percent change in the response magnitude of TNC neurons to electrical stimulation of the dura was greater and receptive field enlargement was larger from the proestrous/estrous group compared to those from the metestrous/diestrous group after administration of capsaicin (P values <.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There is enhanced sensitization of the trigeminal system during the later halves of proestrus and estrus, which represent stages of the rat estrous cycle during and immediately following an abrupt decline in ovarian hormones. If similar changes occur during the human menstrual cycle these results could have important implications for menstrual migraine.

Does experimental pain response vary across the menstrual cycle? A methodological review

The findings on sex differences in human experimental pain research are inconsistent. One possible factor contributing to the inconsistent findings is the female hormonal cycle, as hormone levels may affect pain sensitivity. A number of studies suggest that women's responses to experimentally evoked pain vary across the menstrual cycle. However, at least an equal number of studies suggest a lack of variability. The purpose of this article is to review the literature with emphasis on what we believe could be the reasons for the inconsistent findings, namely, differences in populations sampled, timing of experimental sessions across the menstrual cycle, and nomenclature used to identify the time (phases) in the cycle when measurements were done, nature of the pain stimuli chosen, and outcomes measured. These inconsistencies and other methodological problems associated with most experimental pain studies make it difficult to draw inferences from this literature. For the science to improve, replication of significant findings using standardized timing of sessions, pain stimulus procedures, outcomes, and hormonal assessment is necessary.

A comparison of modality-specific somatosensory changes during menstruation in dysmenorrheic and nondysmenorrheic women

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate somatosensory thresholds to a multimodality stimulation regimen applied both within and outside areas of referred menstrual pain in dysmenorrheic women, over four phases of confirmed ovulatory cycles, and to compare them with thresholds in nondysmenorrheic women during menstruation.

DESIGN

Twenty dysmenorrheic women with menstrual pain scoring 5.45 +/- 0.39 cm (mean +/- standard error of mean) on a visual analog scale (10 cm) participated. Fifteen nondysmenorrheic women with a menstrual pain score of 0.4 +/- 0.2 cm participated as controls. Ovulation was confirmed by an enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique. Menstrual pain was described with the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Areas within menstrual pain referral were two abdominal sites and the midline of the low back, and the arm and thigh were the control areas. The pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pinch pain threshold were determined by a hand-held electronic pressure algometer, the heat pain threshold (HPT) by a contact thermode, and the tactile threshold with von Frey hairs.

RESULTS

In dysmenorrheic women the McGill Pain Questionnaire showed a larger sensory and affective component of pain than the evaluative and miscellaneous groups. The HPT and PPT were lower in the menstrual phase than in the ovulatory, luteal, and premenstrual phases, both within and outside areas of referred menstrual pain (p <0.01), with a more pronounced decrease at the referral pain areas. The pinch pain threshold was lower in the menstrual phase than in the ovulatory phase (p <0.02), and the tactile threshold did not differ significantly across the menstrual phases or within any site. Dysmenorrheic women had a lower HPT at the control sites and a lower PPT at the abdomen, back, and control sites, than in those of nondysmenorrheic women in the menstrual phase.

CONCLUSIONS

The results show reduced somatosensory pain thresholds during menstruation to heat and pressure stimulation, both within and outside areas of referred menstrual pain in dysmenorrheic women. Dysmenorrheic women showed a lower HPT at the control sites and a lower PPT at all the sites than those for nondysmenorrheic women in the menstrual phase. The altered somatosensory thresholds may be dependent on a spinal mechanism of central hyperexcitability, induced by recurrent moderate to severe menstrual pain.

Sensory changes during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle in healthy women

This study compared the pain sensitivity in healthy women at the abdomen and lower back (presumed referral areas of menstrual pain), thigh and arm (control areas), in the menstrual, ovulatory, luteal and premenstrual phases of confirmed ovulatory cycles, with that of males. The pressure pain threshold (PPT) and pinch pain threshold (PiPT) was determined by an electronic pressure algometer, heat pain threshold (HPT) by a contact thermode and tactile threshold (TT) with von Frey hairs. The abdominal PPT was significantly lower in females in all menstrual phases as compared to the control sites ( p<0.0007). The abdominal and lower back HPT was significantly lower in females in all menstrual phases compared with control areas, and to the sites in males ( p<0.002). The TT was significantly reduced in females compared with males ( p< 0.013). There was no difference in the PiPT between females and males. In males, the HPT, PPT and TT were not different within any site. During the ovulatory phase, the HPT was significantly reduced at the abdomen and the PPT at the back compared with the menstrual, luteal and premenstrual phases (p<0.0002). There were no within-menstrual phase variations in the PiPT and TT at any site, or for the HPT and PPT at the control areas. The reduced thresholds in menstruating women may be due to the presence of latent uterine algogenic stimuli, and the increased levels of oestrogen and leuteinizing hormone at ovulation may enhance nociception by acting both at the peripheral and central level, resulting in the hypersensitivity changes at the abdomen and lower back areas.

Long-term fluctuations of pressure pain thresholds in healthy men, normally menstruating women and oral contraceptive users

The aim of this investigation was to evaluate whether the pressure pain threshold (PPT) in masticatory muscles of symptom-free subjects was influenced by fluctuations of the sex hormones. The PPT was measured with an electronic algometer for at least 10 consecutive menstrual cycles in 10 women using oral contraceptives and 10 women not using oral contraceptives, with a regular menstrual cycle (26-31 days). In addition, 10 men were measured in a regular pattern over a period of 1 year. All subjects were symptom-free with an age range between 18 and 39 years. Measurement sessions were held during three different cycle phases (follicular, luteal, perimenstrual) and each session consisted of four consecutive PPT measurements. By means of a linear mixed model (SAS), the PPTs of the masster, temporalis and thumb muscles were compared between: (1) groups, (2) sex-hormonal phases, (3) the four consecutive measurements of each muscle per session and (4) time. The PPTs of the masseter (p = 0.8419) and temporalis muscles (p = 0.2786) did not change significantly over time. There was no significant difference in variance for the masseter (p = 0.6250), temporalis (p = 0.9705) and thumb (p = 0.7446) between the three groups. The PPTs of all muscles were significantly lower during the perimenstrual phases in the two female groups. The present data showed similar patterns of PPTs for the three muscle groups. Moreover, the results have shown a very good consistency of the PPTs over a long time period, both in males and females.

Gender differences and hormonal modulation in visceral pain

Women seek healthcare and are diagnosed more frequently with chronic somatic and visceral pain conditions relative to men. These conditions tend not to be life-threatening disorders, but rather ones that decrease people's quality of life, impinge on work and recreational activities, and increase healthcare resource utilization. With increased awareness of basic gender differences in biology and responsiveness to therapies, there has been renewed interest in factors which may account for the gender disparity in chronic visceral pain conditions. Basic and clinical evidence primarily from patients with irritable bowel syndrome has provided initial insights into visceral pain sensitivity, perception, and responsitivity.

Sex-related hormonal influences on pain and analgesic responses

Considerable evidence indicates sex-related differences in pain responses and in the effectiveness of various analgesic agents. Specifically, females are at greater risk for experiencing many forms of clinical pain and are more sensitive to experimentally induced pain relative to males. Regarding analgesic responses, nonhuman animal studies indicate greater opioid analgesia for males, while a limited human literature suggests the opposite. Though the mechanisms underlying these effects remain unclear, the influence of gonadal hormones on nociceptive processing represents one plausible pathway whereby such sex differences could emerge. The present article reviews the complex literature concerning sex steroid effects on pain responses and analgesia. First, nonhuman animal research related to hormonal effects on nociceptive sensitivity and analgesic responses is presented. Next, human studies regarding gonadal hormonal influences on experimental pain responses are reviewed. Several potential mechanisms underlying hormonal effects on nociceptive processing are discussed, including hormonal effects to both peripheral and central nervous system pathways involved in pain transmission. Finally, based on these findings we draw several conclusions and make specific recommendations that will guide future research as it attempts to elucidate the magnitude and importance of sex-related hormonal effects on the experience of pain.

Are acupuncture points tender? A blinded study of Spleen 6

OBJECTIVES

To explore the methodology for investigating the tenderness of acupuncture points, with particular reference to the hypothesis that the point Spleen 6 (SP6) is more tender in women than in men.

DESIGN

Single-blind, observational study with volunteers.

SETTING

University of Exeter, U.K.

SUBJECTS

Student volunteers, 13 male and 13 female.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Pressure thresholds at SP6, a control acupuncture point Stomach 36, and two nonacupuncture control sites in each leg were measured weekly for 4 weeks.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found between the pressure thresholds of SP6 in women and those in men.

CONCLUSION

The present study provides no strong evidence to support the hypothesis that the acupuncture point SP6 is more tender in women and in men. Recommendations for further investigations are discussed.

Cold-pressor pain tolerance in opiate and cocaine abusers: correlates of drug type and use status

The objective of this study was to describe pain tolerance in drug abusers. Research suggests that drug dependence and pain perception share common neuroanatomical and neurophysiological substrates; thus the abuse of psychoactive drugs was hypothesized to relate to pain tolerance. We examined cold-pressor pain tolerance in 122 male, current and former opioid and cocaine abusers, across use status and primary drug of abuse. Descriptive analyses showed that the ratio of pain-sensitive to pain-tolerant persons was considerably higher than that described in the normative cold-pressor pain literature. Two-way analysis of variance revealed a significant main effect for using status, indicating that current drug use is associated with decreased pain tolerance. The main effect for drug type approached significance, implying that persons who abuse opioids manifest less pain tolerance than cocaine users. The findings emphasize the importance of studying pain tolerance and drug abuse as interrelated phenomena.

Is personality involved in the expression of dysmenorrhea in patients with endometriosis?

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a relationship exists between personality and expression of pain in women with endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN

With use of the Rosenzweig picture frustration study, the personality of women with endometriosis was assessed. These results were then correlated with the manifestation of pain.

RESULTS

Women without dysmenorrhea tended to be less assertive compared with women who complained of dysmenorrhea and women without endometriosis. Those women without dysmenorrhea showed a destructive attitude in face of a problem.

CONCLUSIONS

Personality affected the expression of pain. Pain caused by endometriosis was influenced by each personality type.