Transient renal impairment in acute intracerebral haemorrhage

Brain-kidney interaction: Renal dysfunction following ischemic stroke

Stroke is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, with long-term debilitating effects. Accumulating evidence from experimental studies as well as observational studies in patients suggests a cross talk between the brain and kidney after stroke. Stroke may lead to kidney dysfunction which can adversely impact patient outcome. In this review article, we discuss the epidemiology and mechanisms of brain–kidney interaction following ischemic stroke. Specifically, we discuss the role of the central autonomic network, autoregulation, inflammatory and immune responses, the role of extracellular vesicles and their cargo microRNA, in mediating brain–kidney interaction following stroke. Understanding the bidirectional nature of interaction between the brain and kidney after cerebral injury would have clinical implications for the treatment of stroke and overall patient outcome.

Renal impairment in stroke patients: A comparison between the haemorrhagic and ischemic variants

Background: Renal impairment is regularly seen in hospitalized stroke patients, affecting the outcome of patients, as well as causing difficulties in their management. A prospective cohort study was conducted to assess the trend of renal function in hospitalized ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke patients. The incidence of renal impairment in these subgroups, the contributing factors and the need for renal replacement in renal impaired patients was evaluated. Methods: Alternate day renal function testing was performed in hospitalized stroke patients. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) was calculated and the trend of renal function in the two stroke subgroups (haemorrhagic and ischemic) was assessed, with renal impairment defined as e-GFR < 60mL/ minute per 1.73m 2. Results: Among 52 patients, 25 had haemorrhagic stroke (mean age 59.81 ± 14.67) and 27 had ischemic stroke (mean age 56.12 ± 13.08). The mean e-GFR (mL/minute per 1.732m 2) at admission in the haemorrhagic stroke subgroup was 64.79 ± 25.85 compared to 86.04 ± 26.09 in the ischemic stroke subgroup (p=0.005). Sixteen out of 25 (64%) patients in the haemorrhagic stroke subgroup and 9 out of 27 (33.3%) patients in the ischemic subgroup developed renal impairment (p=0.27). The location of the bleed (p=0.8), volume of hematoma (p=0.966) and surgical intervention (p=0.4) did not predispose the patients to renal impairment. One out of 16 patients with haemorrhagic stroke (who eventually died), and 2 out of 9 patients with ischemic stroke required renal replacement. Conclusion: Renal impairment is commonly seen in stroke patients, more so in patients who suffered haemorrhagic strokes.  The impairment, however, is transient and rarely requires renal replacement therapy.

Renal impairment in stroke patients: A comparison between the haemorrhagic and ischemic variants

Background: Renal impairment is regularly seen in hospitalized stroke patients, affecting the outcome of patients, as well as causing difficulties in their management. A prospective cohort study was conducted to assess the trend of renal function in hospitalized ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke patients. The incidence of renal impairment in these subgroups, the contributing factors and the need for renal replacement in renal impaired patients was evaluated. Methods: Alternate day renal function testing was performed in hospitalized stroke patients. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) was calculated and the trend of renal function in the two stroke subgroups (haemorrhagic and ischemic) was assessed, with renal impairment defined as e-GFR < 60mL/ minute per 1.73m 2. Results: Among 52 patients, 25 had haemorrhagic stroke (mean age 59.81 ± 14.67) and 27 had ischemic stroke (mean age 56.12 ± 13.08). The mean e-GFR (mL/minute per 1.732m 2) at admission in the haemorrhagic stroke subgroup was 64.79 ± 25.85 compared to 86.04 ± 26.09 in the ischemic stroke subgroup (p=0.005). Sixteen out of 25 (64%) patients in the haemorrhagic stroke subgroup and 9 out of 27 (33.3%) patients in the ischemic subgroup developed renal impairment (p=0.027). The location of the bleed (p=0.8), volume of hematoma (p=0.966) and surgical intervention (p=0.4) did not predispose the patients to renal impairment. One out of 16 patients with haemorrhagic stroke (who eventually died), and 2 out of 9 patients with ischemic stroke required renal replacement. Conclusion: Renal impairment is commonly seen in stroke patients, more so in patients who suffered haemorrhagic strokes.  The impairment, however, is transient and rarely requires renal replacement therapy.

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Predicts Severity of Stroke and Outcome

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to evaluate the frequency of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) at admission and its correlation with clinical and radiological severity of stroke and outcome.

METHODS

Two hundred consecutive stroke patients within 48 hours of ictus were prospectively included, and their clinical details including Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and feature of raised intracranial tension were noted. Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging finding included stroke type, location, size, midline shift, herniation, and intraventricular hemorrhage score. SIRS was noted on days 1, 2, 7, and 15. Death and outcome at 3 months were based on modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score.

RESULTS

Seventy-five (37.5%) had infraction and 125(62.5%) intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). SIRS was present in 120 (60%) patients: all the features in 56 (28%), 3 in 48 (24%), and 2 in 16 (8%). The presence of SIRS decreased with time: on the second day in 57%, seventh day in 43%, and 15th day in 21% of patients. Admission SIRS correlated with the GCS score (P < .001), NIHSS score (P < .001), volume of ICH (P < .001), infarction size (P < .001), hypernatremia (P = .001), and respiratory paralysis (P < .001). Thirty-one (15.5%) patients died, and 30 (97%) of them had SIRS. At 3 months, 110 (55%) patients had poor outcome (mRS >2) and of them 90 (82%) had SIRS (P < .001). On multivariate regression analysis, the number of SIRS criteria (P = .16) was not significantly related to 3-month outcome and death but independently related to NIHSS score at admission (odds ratio [OR] = 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22-1.56; P < .001), GCS score (OR = 1.32; 95% CI = 1.01-1.71; P = .04), and duration of hospitalization (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.01-1.15; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

SIRS at presentation is a useful marker for clinicoradiological severity of stroke but not an independent marker of death and disability.

Predictors of gastrointestinal bleeding in acute intracerebral haemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal (GI) haemorrhage is an important and sometimes serious complication in critically ill neurological patients who suffered from stroke and head injury and those in intensive care. There is no study evaluating frequency, severity and risk factors of GI haemorrhage in patients with primary intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH).

AIMS

To evaluate the frequency, severity and predictors of GI haemorrhage in patients with ICH.

METHODS

In a prospective hospital-based study, consecutive CT-proven ICH patients within 10 days of the ictus were included. The patients with history of peptic ulcer, GI haemorrhage, liver and kidney disease, bleeding diathesis and those on antiplatelet, anticoagulant or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) were excluded. A detailed neurological evaluation was carried out. Glasgow coma scale (GCS) was used for assessment of consciousness level and Canadian neurological scale (CNS) for severity of stroke. The haematomas were classified into small (<20 ml), medium (20-40 ml) and large (>40 ml). The occurrence of GI haemorrhage during 14 days of ictus was considered due to ICH. To evaluate the predictors of GI haemorrhage, various clinical and CT scan findings were evaluated by univariate followed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients with ICH were included whose age ranged between 30 and 80 years and 14 were female. The mean GCS score was 8.9 (3-15) and CNS score was 2.2 (2-4). Haematoma was small (<20 ml) in 11 patients and medium (20-40 ml) and large (>40 ml) in 20 patients each. Evidences of septicemia were present in 20 patients. Gastric haemorrhage (GH) was noted in 15 patients which was more than 40 ml in 4 patients and one of these patients needed blood transfusion. On univariate analysis, the size of haematoma, septicemia, motor signs on the nonhemiplegic side and pupillary asymmetry were significantly related to GI haemorrhage. On multivariate analysis, the best set of predictors of gastric haemorrhage included size of haematoma, septicemia and GCS score.

CONCLUSION

GI haemorrhage is more likely present in patients with larger haematoma having septicemia. Our study highlights the importance of septicemia, which is an important and modifiable risk factor for GI bleeding in ICH patients.