Multifocal motor neuropathy: clinical and electrophysiological findings

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and previously updated in 2003, 2005, 2008 and 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

On 22 September 2014 we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS for trials of MMN. We also searched two trials registers for ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. We considered prospective and retrospective case series and case reports in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one RCT of an immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agent has been performed in MMN. This study randomised 28 participants and showed that mycophenolate mofetil, when used with IVIg, did not significantly improve strength, function or reduce the need for IVIg. No serious adverse events were observed. The study was deemed at low risk of bias. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to moderate quality evidence, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit in terms of reducing need for IVIg or improving muscle strength in MMN. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) was first described in 1988 as a purely motor neuropathy affecting multiple motor nerves. The diagnosis was based entirely on demonstrating electrophysiological evidence of a conduction block (CB) that selectively affected motor axons, with sparing of sensory axons even through the site of motor CB. Subsequently, a similar disorder was reported but with absence of demonstrable CB on routine nerve conduction studies and there is still some debate as to whether MMN without CB is related to MMN. MMN is thought to be an inflammatory neuropathy related to an immune attack on motor nerves. The conventional hypothesis is that the primary pathology is segmental demyelination, but recent research raises the possibility of a primary axonopathy. Anti-GM1 antibodies can be found in some patients but it is unclear whether these antibodies are pathogenic. Intravenous immunoglobulin is the mainstay of treatment but other immunosuppressive treatments can also be effective.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and previously updated in 2003, 2005 and 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register (4 October 2011), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2011, Issue 3 in The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (January 1966 to September 2011), EMBASE (January 1980 to September 2011), and LILACS (January 1982 to September 2011) for trials of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We planned to include randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials. We considered prospective and retrospective case series and case reports in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one randomised controlled trial of an immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory agent has been performed in multifocal motor neuropathy. This study randomised 28 participants and showed that mycophenolate mofetil, when used with intravenous immunoglobulin, did not significantly improve strength, function or reduce the need for intravenous immunoglobulin. No serious adverse events were observed. The study was deemed at low risk of bias. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

According to moderate quality evidence, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit in terms of reducing need for intravenous immunoglobulin or improving muscle strength. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and usually multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Intravenous immunoglobulin is beneficial but the role of immunosuppressive agents is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For this update, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register (October 8 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 4), MEDLINE (from January 1966 to October 8 2008), and EMBASE (from January 1980 to October 8 2008), for trials of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials were to be included and one was found. Prospective and retrospective case series and case reports were considered in the Discussion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors searched the titles and abstracts of the articles identified and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we found the first randomised controlled trial of multifocal motor neuropathy. This study, which randomised 28 patients, showed that mycophenolate mofetil did not significantly improve strength or function or reduce the need for intravenous immunoglobulin. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the only randomised placebo-controlled trial of any immunosuppressive agent, mycophenolate mofetil did not produce significant benefit. Trials of other immunosuppressants should be undertaken.

Triple-stimulation technique in multifocal neuropathy with conduction block

In patients with multifocal neuropathy with conduction block (CB), CBs located between the root and Erb's point are not detected in nerve conduction studies. We therefore examined whether the triple-stimulation technique (TST) might provide a useful means of detecting CB proximal to Erb's point. Clinical assessments, extensive nerve conduction studies (NCS), conventional transcranial magnetic stimulation, and TST were performed on 10 patients with multifocal motor neuropathy with CB (MMNCB) and 6 patients with Lewis-Sumner syndrome. Conduction blocks located proximal to Erb's point were detected in 9 patients. Of the CBs, 58% were associated with muscle weakness. The use of TST to detect proximal CB improved the sensitivity of the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine criteria for definite or probable MMNCB from 60% to 90%. Thus, the TST is a useful means for detection of proximal CB and gives NCS considerable additional diagnostic power.

A practical definition of conduction block in IvIg responsive multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block (MMN) can be mistaken for motor neurone disease or other lower motor neurone syndromes, but is treatable with intravenous immunoglobulin (IvIg). Formal electrophysiological criteria for conduction block (CB) are so stringent that substantial numbers of patients may miss out on appropriate treatment.

METHODS

Electrophysiological data were collected from 10 healthy volunteers and compared to data from 10 patients who satisfied the clinical criteria for MMN and who responded to IvIg. This produced a definition of CB in MMN patients which was compared with existing definitions to assess "miss rates".

RESULTS

Mean values for compound muscle action potential area, amplitude, and duration were calculated in normal subjects. Results beyond 3 SD of their respective means were considered abnormal. Using these criteria, CB in the context of MMN was defined as a reduction in negative peak area >23% along a distal nerve segment or >29% across a proximal segment; or a reduction in amplitude >32% across a distal segment or >33% across a proximal segment. All IvIg responsive patients had at least one nerve segment showing such CB. Employing some criteria from the literature would have denied treatment to over 30% of responsive patients.

CONCLUSION

In the clinical setting of suspected MMN, less stringent criteria for CB can improve the diagnosis of this treatable disorder. Exclusions on grounds of temporal dispersion may be over-restrictive. A little over one third of CBs occur proximally.

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatments for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a distinct clinical entity characterised by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetrical limb weakness and minimal sensory abnormality. The diagnostic feature of this condition is the presence of multiple partial motor nerve conduction blocks. Controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of regular intravenous immunoglobulin infusions. Immunosuppressive agents have been used as primary, second-line or adjunctive agents for its treatment. This review was undertaken to identify and review systematically randomised controlled trials of immunosuppressive agents. The use of intravenous immunoglobulin will be the subject of a separate review.

OBJECTIVES

To provide the best available evidence from randomised controlled trials on the role of immunosuppressive agents for the treatment of multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group trials register for all trials of multifocal motor neuropathy published, using 'multifocal motor neuropathy' OR 'chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy' OR ' conduction block' OR ' motor neuropathy' AND 'immunosuppressive agents', 'immunosuppressants', 'corticosteroids', 'plasma exchange', 'azathioprine', 'cyclophosphamide', 'cyclosporin', 'ciclosporin', 'methotrexate', and 'mycophenolate', 'immunomodulatory agents', 'interferon', 'total lymphoid irradiation' or 'bone marrow transplantation' as search terms. In addition we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE for 2000 and 2001 and CINAHL, LILACS for all years. We updated the register search in February 2004 and searched MEDLINE (January 1966 to end May 2004) and EMBASE (January 1980 to end May 2004).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised clinical trials in which allocation was not random but was intended to be unbiased (e.g. alternate allocation) were to have been selected. Since no such trials were discovered, all prospective and retrospective case series were included in the 'background' or 'discussion' sections of the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

All studies on multifocal motor neuropathy or lower motor neuron weakness with conduction block and no sensory abnormality were scrutinised for data on patients treated with any form of immunosuppressive agents besides intravenous immunoglobulin. The information on the outcome of treatment was then collated and summarised.

MAIN RESULTS

We found no randomised controlled trials of any immunosuppressive agents for multifocal motor neuropathy. We summarised the results of retrospective and prospective case series in the discussion of the review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no randomised controlled trials to indicate whether immunosuppressive agents are beneficial in multifocal motor neuropathy.

Multifocal motor neuropathy: current concepts and controversies

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is now a well-defined purely motor multineuropathy characterized by the presence of multifocal partial motor conduction blocks (CB), frequent association with anti-GM1 IgM antibodies, and usually a good response to high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy. However, several issues remain to be clarified in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and therapy of this condition including its nosological position and its relation to other chronic dysimmune neuropathies; the degree of CB necessary for the diagnosis of MMN; the existence of an axonal form of MMN; the pathophysiological basis of CB; the pathogenetic role of antiganglioside antibodies; the mechanism of action of IVIg treatments in MMN and the most effective regimen; and the treatment to be used in unresponsive patients. These issues are addressed in this review of the main clinical, electrophysiological, immunological, and therapeutic features of this neuropathy.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is an immune-mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetrical weakness of limbs without sensory loss. The clinical presentation of MMN mimics that of lower-motor-neuron disease, but in nerve-conduction studies of patients with MMN motor-conduction block has been found. By contrast with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, treatment with prednisolone and plasma exchange is generally ineffective in MMN and even associated with clinical worsening in some patients. Of the immunosuppressants, cyclophosphamide has been reported as effective but only anecdotally. Various open trials and four placebo-controlled trials have shown that treatment with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin leads to improvement of muscle strength in patients with MMN. Although clinical, pathological, imaging, immunological, and electrophysiological studies have improved our understanding of MMN over the past 15 years, further research is needed to elucidate pathogenetic disease mechanisms in the disorder.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a rare, probably immune mediated disorder characterised by slowly progressive, asymmetric, distal weakness of one or more limbs with no objective loss of sensation. It may cause prolonged periods of disability. The treatment options for multifocal motor neuropathy are sparse. Patients with multifocal motor neuropathy do not usually respond to steroids or plasma exchange, and may even worsen with these treatments. Many uncontrolled studies have suggested a beneficial effect of intravenous immunoglobulin.

OBJECTIVES

To review systematically the evidence from randomised controlled trials concerning the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin in multifocal motor neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We used the search strategy of the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Review Group to search the Disease Group register (searched September 2003), MEDLINE (January 1990 to September 2003), EMBASE (January 1990 to September 2003) and ISI (January 1990 to September 2003) databases for randomised controlled trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled studies examining the effects of any dose of intravenous immunoglobulin versus placebo in patients with definite or probable multifocal motor neuropathy. Outcome measures had to include one of the following: disability, strength, or conduction block. Studies which reported the frequency of adverse effects were used to assess safety.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors reviewed literature searches to identify potentially relevant trials, scored their quality and extracted data independently. For dichotomous data, we calculated relative risks, and for continuous data, effect sizes and weighted pooled effect sizes. Statistical uncertainty was expressed with 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN RESULTS

Four randomised controlled trials including a total of 34 patients were suitable for this systematic review. Strength improved in 78% of patients treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and only 4% of placebo-treated patients. Disability improved in 39% of patients after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment and in 11% after placebo (statistically not significantly different). Mild, transient side effects were reported in 71% of intravenous immunoglobulin treated patients. Serious side effects were not encountered.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence from randomised controlled trials shows that intravenous immunoglobulin has a beneficial effect on strength. There was a non-significant trend towards improvement in disability. More research is needed to discover whether intravenous immunoglobulin improves disability and is cost-effective.

Magnetic stimulation using a triple-stimulation technique in patients with multifocal neuropathy without conduction block

It has been suggested previously that multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) without conduction block (CB) or other features of demyelination is axonal in nature. Conventional transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and the triple-stimulation technique (TST) performed on 10 MMN patients without CB revealed a proximal focal CB in 4 patients. In 3 other patients, the amplitude ratio obtained in response to conventional TMS was abnormally low, but the area ratio was normal. The TST amplitude ratio and area ratio were normal in these 3 patients. This pattern suggested the occurrence of temporal dispersion without CB. The occurrence of temporal dispersion or CB was associated with a relatively satisfactory response to intravenous immunoglobulins. These findings suggest that some forms of MMN previously thought to be axonal are in fact proximal variants of MMN with CB.

Neuropathies motrices multifocales avec blocs de conduction persistants : 18 ans après

Multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks was firstly reported in 1986 and outlined from the group of purely motor diseases of the peripheral nervous system. The main criterion is the presence of conduction blocks located only on the motor nerves; additionally 30 percent of patients have IgM subclass serum antibodies directed against GM1 ganglioside. The clinical picture is a multifocal, asymmetrical, neuropathy, starting and predominant in the upper limbs, occurring in males aged 50 years and more, and having a progressive course. There is no biological sign besides elevated anti-GM1 antibodies. CSF analysis discloses mild increased protein count. The course is unpredictable, the neuropathy may be strictly limited to one or two motor nerves, or spread to other motor nerves in the four limbs. There is no involvement of the sensory and the cranial nerves, no involvement of the autonomic and the central nervous system. The pathophysiology is unknown, animal models do not allow to confirm the role of humoral immunity, and the role of anti-GM1 antibodies is controversial. Randomized controlled trials have assessed the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulins which dramatically improve strength in 70-80 percent of patients in the short term, but remain unable to prevent motor deterioration in most patients, together with the occurrence of new conduction blocks. Corticosteroids and plasma exchanges do not improve the patients and may be followed by transient worsening. Long-term efficacy of immunosuppressive agents is not known.

A variant of multifocal motor neuropathy with acute, generalised presentation and persistent conduction blocks

OBJECTIVE

Multifocal motor neuropathy with persistent conduction blocks is classically described as a chronic neuropathy with progressive onset, and acute forms have not previously been characterised. We report four cases of severe motor impairment with acute and generalised onset and with persistent motor conduction blocks.

PATIENTS AND RESULTS

An acute tetraparesis with diffuse areflexia but little or no sensory disturbance was the clinical picture. Serial electrophysiological tests showed persistent multifocal motor conduction blocks with absent F waves in most tested motor nerves. No or minor abnormalities of the sensory nerve action potentials were observed. Cerebrospinal fluid contained normal or mildly increased protein levels (<1 g/l) without cells. Campylobacter jejuni serology was negative in three patients and consistent with past infection in one patient. Anti-ganglioside antibodies were positive in three patients. A five day course of intravenous immunoglobulins produced nearly complete symptom resolution in three patients and was ineffective in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Because of the persistence of multifocal motor conduction blocks for several weeks or months as the isolated electrophysiological feature, these cases could not be consistent with Guillain-Barré syndrome or chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. They suggest an original variant of multifocal motor neuropathy with an acute and generalised initial presentation and persistent motor conduction blocks affecting all four limbs.

Demyelination and axonal loss in multifocal motor neuropathy: distribution and relation to weakness

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is characterized by a slowly progressive, asymmetric weakness of the limbs without sensory loss. The arms are usually affected to a greater extent than the legs, and distal muscles more than proximal muscles. The distribution of electrophysiological abnormalities and its correlation with weak muscle groups in MMN have not been investigated systematically. The aim of the present study was to assess whether electrophysiological abnormalities have a preferential or random distribution, whether electrophysiological abnormalities in a nerve correlate with weakness in the innervated muscles, and whether these results are relevant for the development of optimal electrodiagnostic protocols. We compared the pattern of weakness and electrophysiological abnormalities in 39 patients with a lower motoneuron syndrome and a positive response to intravenous immunoglobulins. All patients underwent an extensive standardized electrophysiological examination. Electrophysiological evidence of demyelination was found more often in the nerves of the arms and was distributed randomly over lower arm, upper arm and shoulder segments. Electrophysiological evidence of axonal loss presented more frequently in longer nerves, occurring most often in the leg nerves. For the arm nerves, it is possible that the length dependence of axonal loss is due to the random distribution of demyelinating lesions that lead to axonal degeneration. Weakness was associated with features of demyelination and axonal loss in the nerves of the arm, and with features of axonal loss in leg nerves. However, a substantial number (approximately one-third) of electrophysiological abnormalities were found in nerves innervating non-weakened muscles. These results imply that in MMN, conduction block is most likely to be found in long arm nerves innervating weakened muscles, but if conduction block cannot be detected in these nerves, the electrophysiological examination should be extended to other arm nerves including those innervating non-weakened muscles.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a recently identified peripheral nerve disorder characterized by progressive, predominantly distal, asymmetric limb weakness mostly affecting upper limbs, minimal or no sensory impairment, and by the presence on nerve conduction studies of multifocal persistent partial conduction blocks on motor but not sensory nerves. The etiopathogenesis of MMN is not known, but there is some evidence, based mostly on the clinical improvement after immunological therapies, that the disease has an immunological basis. Antibodies, mostly IgM, to the gangliosides GM1, and though less frequently, GM2 and GD1a, are frequently detected in patients' sera, helping in the diagnosis of this disease. Even if there is some experimental evidence that these antibodies may be pathogenic in vitro, their role in the neuropathy remains to be established. Patients with MMN do not usually respond to steroids or plasma exchange, which may occasionally worsen the symptoms, while the efficacy of cyclophosphamide is limited by its relevant side effects. More than 80% of MMN patients rapidly improve with high dose intravenous immunoglobulin therapy (IVIg). The effect of this therapy is, however, transient and improvement has to be maintained with periodic infusions. A positive response to interferon-beta has been recently reported in a minority of patients, some of whom were resistant to IVIg. Even if many progresses have been made on the diagnosis and therapy of MMN, there are still several issues on the nosological position, etiopathogenesis and long-term treatment of this neuropathy that need to be clarified.

Electrodiagnostic studies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other motor neuron disorders

The clinical electrodiagnostic medicine (EDX) consultant asked to assess patients with suspected amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has a number of responsibilities. Among the most important is to provide a clinical assessment in conjunction with the EDX study. The seriousness of the diagnoses and their enormous personal and economic impact require a high-quality EDX study based on a thorough knowledge of and experience with motor neuron diseases (MNDs) and related disorders. Clinical evaluation will help determine which of the EDX tools available to the EDX consultant should be applied in individual patients. Although electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction study are the most valuable, each of the following may be helpful in the assessment of selected patients based on their clinical findings: repetitive nerve stimulation, motor unit number estimate, single-fiber EMG, somatosensory evoked potential, autonomic function test, and polysomnography. The pertinent literature on these is reviewed in this monograph. The selection and application of these EDX tools depend on a thorough knowledge of the MNDs and related disorders.

Central motor conduction time in patients with multifocal motor conduction block

The finding of conduction block (CB) within short consecutive segments along a motor nerve is a key feature of multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN). Despite their different pathogenesis, this may be the only clinical difference between some cases of MMN and the pure spinal muscular atrophy form of motor neuron disease (MND). In 12 patients with distal atrophy and fasciculations and electrophysiological evidence of CBs in the upper limbs, we measured the peripheral and central motor conduction times (PMCT and CMCT) to hand muscles. We reasoned that patients with MMN should show an abnormally prolonged PMCT with normal CMCT, whereas an increased CMCT would suggest MND. All patients had delayed F-wave latency and increased PMCT. Three patients had increased CMCT. Follow-up showed little clinical and electrophysiological change in 7 of the 9 patients with normal CMCT, and a progressive motor deficit leading ultimately to death in 1 of the 3 patients with increased CMCT. This patient's electrophysiological follow-up showed a significant decrement of the compound motor action potential to both proximal and distal stimulation points, with disappearance of earlier CBs. Autopsy revealed loss of anterior horn cells and axons of the ventral root, and degeneration of large myelinated fibers. We conclude that determining the CMCT may help in differentiating MND from MMN. Persistence of a stable clinical picture over a span of at least 1 year and lack of electrophysiological signs of involvement of upper motor neurons should both be required before establishing the diagnosis of MMN even with electrophysiological evidence of CB.

Motor root conduction in neuralgic amyotrophy: evidence of proximal conduction block

OBJECTIVE

To determine the presence and role of proximal conduction block in neuralgic amyotrophy.

METHODS

Percutaneous electrical stimulation of cervical roots and brachial plexus was employed in eight patients with neuralgic amyotrophy. Root to Erb's point compound muscle action potential amplitude ratios for abductor digiti minimi, extensor digitorum communis, biceps, and deltoid muscles were compared with results obtained from 10 healthy controls.

RESULTS

Conduction block in the nerve to one muscle was found in three of eight patients (38%) suggesting focal proximal demyelination. Repeat studies showed axonal degeneration, resolution, and persistence of conduction block in these three patients respectively.

CONCLUSION

Focal conduction block plays a significant part in the pathogenesis of neuralgic amyotrophy, which is generally regarded as an axon loss process. Therapeutic intervention should be directed to patients with persistent conduction block, with the aim of eradicating the block and possibly minimising subsequent axon loss.

[Multifocal motor neuropathy: an individualized disease of the peripheral nervous system]

Multifocal motor neuropathy is a peripheral nervous system disease described among chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathies. It is characterized according to both clinical criteria, including chronic asymmetric and multifocal deficit which starts and remains prominent in the upper limbs, and electrophysiological criteria, including persistent multifocal motor conduction blocks in motor nerves. High titers of serum antiganglioside GM1 antibodies are discovered in nearly 40% of cases. Steroids and plasma exchange are not efficient. High doses of intravenous immunoglobulins (i.v.Ig) improved symptoms in the majority of open and controlled published studies. The quality of the response to i.v.Ig may worsen in some patients after a variable number of infusions, leading to immunosuppressive treatments mainly with oral or intravenous cyclophosphamide. Its etiology is unknown but the frequent presence of anti-GM1 antibody high serum titers, the pathological findings in some rare morphological studies, and the response to i.v.Ig favor the hypothesis of an autoimmune disorder.