Long-term hemodynamic effects at rest and during exercise of newer antihypertensive agents and salt restriction in essential hypertension: review of epanolol, doxazosin, amlodipine, felodipine, diltiazem, lisinopril, dilevalol, carvedilol, and ketanserin

Renal sympathetic denervation lowers systemic vascular resistance in true treatment-resistant hypertension

PURPOSE

Renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) is again gaining interest as recent well-designed trials have demonstrated reduced ambulatory blood pressure (BP) after RDN. However, the hemodynamic mechanisms have not been elucidated. We aimed for the first time to investigate the effect of RDN on the "Hallmark of Hypertension" namely increased systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated SVRI change in patients with true treatment-resistant hypertension randomised to RDN (n = 9) or drug adjusted control (n = 9). Treatment-resistant hypertension was defined as office systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg despite ≥ 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic. True treatment-resistant hypertension was confirmed prior to inclusion with ambulatory daytime systolic BP ≥ 135 mmHg immediately after witnessed intake of antihypertensive drugs. Hemodynamic variables were recorded with thoracic impedance cardiography at baseline and at three and six months follow-up after RDN. This non-invasive method also guided further tailoring of drug treatment in the control group aiming to normalise hemodynamic variables and BP.

RESULTS

From three to six months follow-up after RDN, SVRI decreased with a median of -611 dyn*s*m²/cm⁵ [IQR -949 to -267] (p < 0.01), while supine mean BP decreased with a median of -11 mmHg [IQR -21 to -3] (p = 0.02). In the same period, SVRI in the control group was reduced with -674 dyn*s*m²/cm⁵ [IQR -1,309 to -340] (p < 0.01), while supine mean BP decreased with -15 mmHg [IQR -29 to -6] (p = 0.01). Thus, hemodynamic variables and BP in the two groups normalised in parallel.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that in patients with true treatment-resistant hypertension, renal sympathetic denervation lowers BP by reducing systemic vascular resistance of similar size as in the control group with careful individual selection of antihypertensive drugs and dose titration.

Vascular stiffening in pulmonary hypertension: cause or consequence? (2013 Grover Conference series)

Recent studies have indicated that systemic arterial stiffening is a precursor to hypertension and that hypertension, in turn, can perpetuate arterial stiffening. Pulmonary artery (PA) stiffening is also well documented to occur in pulmonary hypertension (PH), and there is evidence that pulmonary vascular stiffness (PVS) may be a better predictor of outcome than pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). We have hypothesized that the decreased flow-damping function of elastic PAs in PH likely initiates and/or perpetuates dysfunction of pulmonary microvasculature. Recent studies have shown that large-vessel stiffening increases flow pulsatility in the distal pulmonary vasculature, leading to endothelial dysfunction within a proinflammatory, vasoconstricting, and profibrogenic environment. The intricate role of stiffening-stimulated high pulsatile flow in endothelial cell dysfunction includes stepwise molecular events underlying PA hypertrophy, inflammation, endothelial-mesenchymal transition, and fibrosis. In addition to contributing to microenvironmental alterations of the distal vasculature, disordered proximal-distal PA coupling likely also plays a role in increasing ventricular afterload, ultimately causing right ventricle (RV) dysfunction and death. Current therapeutic treatments do not provide a realistic approach to destiffening arteries and, thus, to potentially abrogating the effects of high pulsatile flow on the distal pulmonary vasculature or the increased work imposed by stiffening on the RV. Scrutinizing the effect of PA stiffening on high pulsatile flow-induced cellular and molecular changes, and vice versa, might lead to important new therapeutic options that abrogate PA remodeling and PH development. With a clear understanding that PA stiffening may contribute to the progression of PH to an irreversible state by contributing to chronic microvascular damage in lungs, future studies should be aimed first at defining the underlying mechanisms leading to PA stiffening and then at improved treatment approaches based on these findings.

Exercise Hypertension

Irrespective of apparent 'normal' resting blood pressure (BP), some individuals may experience an excessive elevation in BP with exercise (i.e. systolic BP ≥210 mm Hg in men or ≥190 mm Hg in women or diastolic BP ≥110 mm Hg in men or women), a condition termed exercise hypertension or a 'hypertensive response to exercise' (HRE). An HRE is a relatively common condition that is identified during standard exercise stress testing; however, due to a lack of information with respect to the clinical ramifications of an HRE, little value is usually placed on such a finding. In this review, we discuss both the clinical importance and underlying physiological contributors of exercise hypertension. Indeed, an HRE is associated with an increased propensity for target organ damage and also predicts the future development of hypertension, cardiovascular events and mortality, independent of resting BP. Moreover, recent work has highlighted that some of the elevated cardiovascular risks associated with an HRE may be related to high-normal resting BP (pre-hypertension) or ambulatory 'masked' hypertension and that an HRE may be an early warning signal of abnormal BP control that is otherwise undetected with clinic BP. Whilst an HRE may be amenable to treatment via pharmacological and lifestyle interventions, the exact physiological mechanism of an HRE remains elusive, but it is likely a manifestation of multiple factors including large artery stiffness, increased peripheral resistance, neural circulatory control and metabolic irregularity. Future research focus may be directed towards determining threshold values to denote the increased risk associated with an HRE and further resolution of the underlying physiological factors involved in the pathogenesis of an HRE.

Divergent cardiac response to exercise in essential hypertension vs. normotension and the effect of enalapril

The aims of this study were to examine (1) the cardiac response to exercise in essential hypertension and (2) the effect of long-term enalapril treatment on cardiac reserve. Ten normotensive control subjects and 15 patients with moderate, essential hypertension underwent radionuclide ventriculography during graded, supine exercise (0 W-50 W-100 W). The hypertensive patients were studied during monotherapy using hydrochlorothiazide and 3 and 12 months after supplementation with enalapril 10-40 mg o.d. During exercise, the control subjects demonstrated a 17% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) mediated by a 30% decrease in end-systolic volume, a small increase in stroke volume and a minor biphasic (increase-decrease) change in end-diastolic volume. In the hypertensive patients, both the end-diastolic and the end-systolic volume increased substantially with no increase in LVEF, although stroke volume increased by 33%. Long-term therapy with enalapril induced only a minor change towards a more normal pattern of cardiac response to exercise. The hypertensive patients increased their stroke volume during exercise by recruiting preload reserve instead of increasing contractility. Long-term treatment with enalapril had little, if any, effect on this abnormal cardiac response.

Lisinopril. A review of its pharmacology and clinical efficacy in elderly patients

Lisinopril, the lysine analogue of enalaprilat, is a long-acting angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor which is administered once daily by mouth. The efficacy of lisinopril in reducing blood pressure is well established in younger populations, and many trials now show it to be effective in lowering blood pressure in elderly patients with hypertension. In comparative and non-comparative clinical trials, 68.2 to 89.1% of elderly patients responded (diastolic pressure < or = 90 mm Hg) to > or = 8 weeks' lisinopril treatment. Age-related differences in antihypertensive efficacy do not appear to be clinically significant, and dosages effective in elderly patients tend to range from 2.5 to 40 mg/day. Dosages usually need to be lower in patients with significant renal impairment. In congestive heart failure, lisinopril 2.5 to 20 mg/day increases exercise duration, improves left ventricular ejection fraction and has no significant effect on ventricular ectopic beats. It is similar in efficacy to enalapril and digoxin and similar or superior to captopril on most end-points. Data from the GISSI-3 post-myocardial infarction trial show that lisinopril reduced mortality and left ventricular dysfunction when given for 42 days starting within 24 hours of the onset of infarction symptoms. Results at 6 weeks and 6 months were similar in elderly and younger patients. Elderly patients, however, among other subgroups, exhibited a strong reduction in risk of low ejection fraction after treatment (-25.5%). Economic studies suggest that lisinopril is cost saving compared with other ACE inhibitors in some markets. When given according to the GISSI-3 protocol, lisinopril appears to be one of the less expensive of the successful ACE inhibitor regimens for acute myocardial infarction. In other trials, patients with diabetic nephropathy and hypertension improved or did not deteriorate during lisinopril treatment. Blood pressure was controlled and reductions or trends towards reductions in albuminuria were observed. These reductions were similar to those in diltiazem, nifedipine and verapamil recipients, and greater than those in patients receiving atenolol. Lisinopril appears to reduce mortality in diabetic patients after myocardial infarction and may also improve neuropathy associated with diabetes. Lisinopril is well tolerated and the profile of adverse events seen is typical of ACE inhibitors as a class. There is a tendency for more elderly than younger patients to discontinue treatment, but this trend is not clearly related to the incidence of adverse events in these age groups. Drug interactions occur with few other agents and are usually clinically significant only between lisinopril and either diuretics or lithium. Lisinopril is, thus, an effective treatment for elderly patients with hypertension, congestive heart failure and acute myocardial infarction and has shown promising benefits in patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Unchanged central hemodynamics after six months of moderate sodium restriction with or without potassium supplement in essential hypertension

Sodium (Na) restriction and potassium (K) supplementation has been recommended as treatment of essential hypertension but the mechanism by which these may reduce blood pressure (BP) is unknown. We examined if moderately reduced Na intake, combined with a low-Na/high-K salt alternative (Pansalt: NaCl 57%, KCl 28%, MgSO4 12%) as substitute for standard table salt, induced clinically significant BP reduction in hypertensive patients and, if this therapy reduced total peripheral resistance. After a 2-month control period 40 patients aged 21-67 years with mean casual BP 156/103 mmHg were given a salt restricted diet (120 mmol Na/24 h) for 6 months. In addition, they were randomised in a double-blind manner to receive either Pansalt (P-group) or standard NaCl (S-group) as table salt in small amounts. Cardiac output was measured by dye dilution. Daily Na excretion was similarly reduced (20%) in both groups while K excretion was slightly increased in the P-group and reduced in the S-group (difference p < 0.05). No large changes occurred in 24-h ambulatory BP (by Accutracker II) or intraarterial pressure (through a brachial artery catheter) at rest or during exercise while casual BP was reduced (p < 0.05) 13/8 mmHg in the P-group and 8/5 mmHg in the S-group. While cardiac output was slightly reduced at rest and during 50W exercise in the P-group, no significant changes were seen in total peripheral resistance in either group. Thus, moderate reduction in Na intake, with or without addition of K, is not sufficient to induce significant long-term intraarterial or 24-h ambulatory BP changes in essential hypertension. Without BP changes invasively determined central hemodynamics remains remarkably stable over a 6-month period.