Effect of enoximone alone and in combination with metoprolol on myocardial function and energetics in severe congestive heart failure: improvement in hemodynamic and metabolic profile

Targeting Adrenergic Receptors in Metabolic Therapies for Heart Failure

The heart has a reduced capacity to generate sufficient energy when failing, resulting in an energy-starved condition with diminished functions. Studies have identified numerous changes in metabolic pathways in the failing heart that result in reduced oxidation of both glucose and fatty acid substrates, defects in mitochondrial functions and oxidative phosphorylation, and inefficient substrate utilization for the ATP that is produced. Recent early-phase clinical studies indicate that inhibitors of fatty acid oxidation and antioxidants that target the mitochondria may improve heart function during failure by increasing compensatory glucose oxidation. Adrenergic receptors (α₁ and β) are a key sympathetic nervous system regulator that controls cardiac function. β-AR blockers are an established treatment for heart failure and α_1A-AR agonists have potential therapeutic benefit. Besides regulating inotropy and chronotropy, α₁- and β-adrenergic receptors also regulate metabolic functions in the heart that underlie many cardiac benefits. This review will highlight recent studies that describe how adrenergic receptor-mediated metabolic pathways may be able to restore cardiac energetics to non-failing levels that may offer promising therapeutic strategies.

Pharmacologic Management of Acute Heart Failure: A Review

Because of improved social and medical standards in the western world, the average age of the population continues to increase. This altering demographic profile has its impact on the surgical population, resulting in a dramatic increase in the number of patients with exten sive cardiovascular disease, presenting for either car diac or noncardiac surgery. As a result, the incidence of perioperative acute congestive heart failure (CHF) is a major clinical problem at the present time. For the pharmacologic management of acute CHF, the β-adreno ceptor agonists continue to be the mainstay of therapy, due to their short duration of action and hemodynamic controlability by continuous intravenous infusion. Mono therapy with the phosphodiesterase type III (PDE) inhibi tors appears to be the treatment of choice in selected patients with high systemic vascular resistance or re sidual β-adrenoceptor blockade. Combination therapy especially deserves attention, because this approach allows the enhancement of contractile force, possibly without the side effects associated with the administra tion of high concentrations of one agent alone. New developments including ultrashort-acting PDE inhibi tors, calcium-dependent calcium sensitizers, and cal cium promotors are anxiously awaited.

Novel role of phosphodiesterase inhibitors in the management of end-stage heart failure

In advanced heart failure (HF), chronic inotropic therapy with intravenous milrinone, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, is used as a bridge to advanced management that includes transplantation, ventricular assist device implantation, or palliation. This is especially true when repeated attempts to wean off inotropic support result in symptomatic hypotension, worsened symptoms, and/or progressive organ dysfunction. Unfortunately, patients in this clinical predicament are considered hemodynamically labile and may escape the benefits of guideline-directed HF therapy. In this scenario, chronic milrinone infusion may be beneficial as a bridge to introduction of evidence based HF therapy. However, this strategy is not well studied, and in general, chronic inotropic infusion is discouraged due to potential cardiotoxicity that accelerates disease progression and proarrhythmic effects that increase sudden death. Alternatively, chronic inotropic support with milrinone infusion is a unique opportunity in advanced HF. This review discusses evidence that long-term intravenous milrinone support may allow introduction of beta blocker (BB) therapy. When used together, milrinone does not attenuate the clinical benefits of BB therapy while BB mitigates cardiotoxic effects of milrinone. In addition, BB therapy decreases the risk of adverse arrhythmias associated with milrinone. We propose that advanced HF patients who are intolerant to BB therapy may benefit from a trial of intravenous milrinone as a bridge to BB initiation. The discussed clinical scenarios demonstrate that concomitant treatment with milrinone infusion and BB therapy does not adversely impact standard HF therapy and may improve left ventricular function and morbidity associated with advanced HF.

Weaning from inotropic support and concomitant beta-blocker therapy in severely ill heart failure patients: take the time in order to improve prognosis

AIMS

Beta-blockers improve the prognosis in heart failure (HF), but their introduction may seem impossible in patients dependent on inotropic support. However, many of these patients can be titrated on beta-blockers, but there is little evidence of successful clinical strategies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed the records of inotropy-dependent patients referred for assessment for heart transplantation. Thirty-six patients (45%) could not be weaned (NW) and underwent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation or transplantation, or died. However, 44 (55%) were successfully weaned (SW). Neither the aetiology (ischaemic vs. non-ischaemic) nor cardiac indexes were different in the SW as compared with the NW group (2.27±0.5 vs. 2.15±0.6 L/min/m2). The NW patients had lower LVEF (15±5% vs. 19±5%, P=0.001), higher right atrial pressure (12±6 vs. 8±6 mmHg, P=0.02), and more severe mitral regurgitation (P<0.001) than the SW patients. At discharge, 35 of 44 SW patients were receiving beta-blockers. In 29 of them, a beta-blocker could only be initiated or continued during concomitant support with i.v. enoximone for a duration of 14.1±7.2 days. Patients discharged on a beta-blocker had an LVAD/transplantation-free cumulative survival of 71% during a follow-up of 2074±201 days (confidence interval 1679–2470).

CONCLUSION

It takes time to put severely ill HF patients on beta-blockers and it may require bridging with inotropes which are independent of beta-adrenergic receptors. Whether such a strategy may result in a better clinical outcome warrants further research.

Sepsis, venous return, and teleology

An understanding of heart-circulation interaction is crucial to our ability to guide our patients through an episode of septic shock. Our knowledge has advanced greatly in the last one hundred years. There are, however, certain empirical phenomena that may lead us to question the wisdom of our prevailing treatment algorithm. Three extreme but iatrogenically possible haemodynamic states exist. Firstly, inappropriately low venous return; secondly, overzealous arteriolar constriction; and finally, misguided inotropy and chronotropy. Following an unsuccessful fluid challenge, it would be logical to first set the venous tone, then set the cardiac rate and contractility, and finally set the peripheral vascular resistance. It is hypothesized that a combination of dihydroergotamine, milrinone and esmolol should be superior to a combination of noradrenaline and dobutamine for surviving sepsis.

Modulation of beta-adrenergic receptor signaling in heart failure and longevity: targeting adenylyl cyclase type 5

Despite remarkable advances in therapy, heart failure remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Although enhanced beta-adrenergic receptor stimulation is part of normal physiologic adaptation to either the increase in physiologic demand or decrease in cardiac function, chronic beta-adrenergic stimulation has been associated with increased mortality and morbidity in both animal models and humans. For example, overexpression of cardiac Gsalpha or beta-adrenergic receptors in transgenic mice results in enhanced cardiac function in young animals, but with prolonged overstimulation of this pathway, cardiomyopathy develops in these mice as they age. Similarly, chronic sympathomimetic amine therapy increases morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. Conversely, the use of beta-blockade has proven to be of benefit and is currently part of the standard of care for heart failure. It is conceivable that interrupting distal mechanisms in the beta-adrenergic receptor-G protein-adenylyl cyclase pathway may also provide targets for future therapeutic modalities for heart failure. Interestingly, there are two major isoforms of adenylyl cyclase (AC) in the heart (type 5 and type 6), which may exert opposite effects on the heart, i.e., cardiac overexpression of AC6 appears to be protective, whereas disruption of type 5 AC prolongs longevity and protects against cardiac stress. The goal of this review is to summarize the paradigm shift in the treatment of heart failure over the past 50 years from administering sympathomimetic amine agonists to administering beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists, and to explore the basis for a novel therapy of inhibiting type 5 AC.

Influence of metoprolol on systolic and diastolic function in children with heart failure

The aim of this study was to assess the effect ofmetoprolol on cardiac function in children with heart failure. This randomized double-blind placebo controlled clinical trial was performed in children with heart failure due to left ventricle volume overload structural heart disease such as VSD, PDA, AI and MR who referred to pediatric cardiology clinics in sari in 2007. The patients divided into case and control groups. All cases were matched as viewpoints of age, sex, weight, kinds of primary disease and cardiac drugs (except for metoprolol).Metoprolol with single daily dose of 1 mg kg(-1) and placebo were given to patients in case and control groups respectively. Echocardiography with cardiac indices of systolic and diastolic function was done as baseline and monthly for 3 months in all the patients. Data were analyzed using SPSS software and statistical t-test. Thirty patients (16 cases and 14 controls) were enrolled in the study. CI, MPI and dv/dt (dt) decreased significantly at first month. Significant changes in LVEF and EPSS appeared on the second month and in E wave and E/A appeared on the third month. The results were in favor of systolic and diastolic improvement. Metoprolol causes improvement of cardiac systolic and diastolic function in children with heart failure due to cardiac defect. Therefore, metoprolol is recommended in patients with heart failure in above mentioned diseases that have not been controlled adequately in spite of receiving standard cardiac failure drug therapy such as an inotrope, a diuretic and a vasodilator agent.

Combined use of ultra-short acting β-blocker esmolol and intravenous phosphodiesterase 3 inhibitor enoximone

In patients with impaired myocardial contractility associated with downregulation of the beta-receptors, compounds inhibiting phosphodiesterase (PDE) 3 may be useful to increase contractility. The PDE3 inhibitor enoximone has been shown to improve pump-function independent from the beta-receptor pathway. A simultaneous decrease in ventricular preload and afterload by vasodilation has led to the term 'inodilator'. Esmolol is the only available ultra-short acting intravenous beta-blocking agent. Due to its half-life of approximately 9 min, beta-blockade, and thus, heart rate, can easily be titrated. Esmolol appears to be a helpful tool to avoid myocardial ischemia (e.g., in the perioperative setting). As with all other beta-blockers, it has dose-dependent negative inotropic effects, and this limits its use in patients with severe heart failure showing low cardiac output. It seems reasonable that an intravenous combination of both approaches, enoximone-induced positive inotropy and esmolol-associated protection from myocardial ischemia, might offer advantages by producing beneficial hemodynamic effects and by compensating each other's limitations in a complementary way. In spite of some promising results, the place of a combination of enoximone and esmolol in the process of treating patients with (acute) heart failure showing low output is still not entirely clear, and needs further confirmation.

Rationale and design of the enoximone clinical trials program

BACKGROUND

Chronic heart failure is a disease syndrome characterized in its advanced stages by a poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations, and a high risk of mortality. In advanced and ultra-advanced chronic heart failure, many treatment options, such as cardiac transplantation and mechanical devices, are severely limited by availability and cost. Short-term Phase II clinical trials suggest that low-dose oral inotropic therapy with enoximone may improve hemodynamics and exercise capacity, without adversely affecting mortality, in selected subjects with advanced chronic heart failure. Based on these data, the ability of enoximone to deliver safe and efficacious palliative treatment of advanced/ultra-advanced chronic heart failure is being evaluated in Phase III clinical trials.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Enoximone Clinical Trials Program is a series of 4 clinical trials designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of oral enoximone in advanced chronic heart failure. ESSENTIAL I and II (The Studies of Oral Enoximone Therapy in Advanced Heart Failure) will investigate the effects of oral enoximone on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular hospitalization, submaximal exercise capacity, and quality of life in subjects with New York Heart Association Class III/IV chronic heart failure. EMOTE (Oral Enoximone in Intravenous Inotrope-Dependent Subjects) will evaluate the potential of oral enoximone to wean subjects with ultra-advanced chronic heart failure from chronic intravenous inotropic therapy to which they have been shown to be dependent. EMPOWER (Enoximone Plus Extended-Release Metoprolol Succinate in Subjects with Advanced Chronic Heart Failure) will explore the potential of enoximone to increase the tolerability of continuous release metoprolol in subjects shown previously to be hemodynamically intolerant to beta-blocker treatment.

CONCLUSION

These studies are Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials designed to test the general hypothesis that chronic oral administration of low doses of enoximone can produce beneficial effects in subjects with advanced or ultra-advanced chronic heart failure.

The prophylactic use of the beta-blocker esmolol in combination with phosphodiesterase III inhibitor enoximone in elderly cardiac surgery patients

We assessed the influence of the prophylactic use of a combination of the IV beta-adrenergic blocker, esmolol, and the phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, enoximone, on postbypass hemodynamic status, inflammation, and endothelial and organ function in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 42 patients aged >65 yr undergoing aortocoronary bypass grafting. In 21 patients, esmolol (aim: heart rate <70 bpm) plus enoximone (initial bolus of 0.5 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion of 2.5 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was started after induction of anesthesia and continued until the morning of the first postoperative day; another 21 patients received saline solution as placebo. Hemodynamics, splanchnic perfusion (gastric-arterial CO(2) gap), liver function (glutathione transferase-alpha plasma levels), renal function (creatinine clearance, urine concentrations of N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase), myocardial ischemia (creatine-kinase MB and troponin T plasma levels), inflammation (elastase, interleukin-6 and -8 plasma levels), and endothelial integrity (adhesion molecules plasma levels) were assessed at baseline, before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and in the intensive care unit until the first postoperative day. Catecholamine requirements were significantly less in the treated than in the nontreated patients. Heart rate was significantly slower, cardiac index was higher, and gastric-arterial CO(2) gap was significantly lower in the treatment group. Troponin T, beta-N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, glutathione transferase-alpha, and soluble adhesion molecules increased significantly in the untreated control, but remained almost normal in the esmolol+enoximone patients. Inflammatory responses (elastase/interleukins) were attenuated by esmolol+enoximone. We conclude that, in comparison to an untreated control, the prophylactic use of a combination of esmolol and enoximone in elderly patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass resulted in overall beneficial effects on postbypass hemodynamic status, organ function, inflammatory response, and endothelial integrity.

The dilemma of late-stage heart failure. Rationale for chronic parenteral inotropic support

The available evidence suggests that while chronic inotropic support likely exerts a long-term deleterious effect on survival, their use is accompanied by short-term enhancements in symptomatology and decreases in medical resource use, thereby curtailing the overall medical costs. The decision to use chronic parenteral inotropic support should not be made lightly and must be considered only after all evidence based therapeutic options has been investigated thoroughly and tried (Fig. 1). This should include not only hemodynamic monitoring-based drug therapy but [figure: see text] also appropriate consideration for options such as heart transplantation or patient enrollment into large-scale drug trials that seek to answer pertinent issues relating to various aspects of advanced heart failure therapeutics. The use of parenteral inotropic support as a chronic bridge to transplantation is accepted widely but remains controversial in other scenarios. For instance, when refractory congestion or hypoperfusion is exhibited in the absence of any definitive medical or mechanical option, it may be wise to contemplate inotropic support after appropriate informed consent has been obtained from the patient. Lastly, it is of great importance to continually seek ways to transit the patient from this approach to a definitive therapeutic end point, such as with transition to oral beta-blockade, which may be better tolerated in the patient with advanced heart failure using an inotropic umbrella.

Low-level inotropic stimulation with type III phosphodiesterase inhibitors in patients with advanced symptomatic chronic heart failure receiving beta-blocking agents

beta-blocking agents are now well established as a cornerstone therapy in mild to moderate heart failure. Patients with more advanced heart failure depend on adrenergic activation to maintain adequate myocardial function. This leads to significant difficulties in using beta-blockers in advanced or severe heart failure. In addition, recent data indicate that adrenergic withdrawal might be detrimental in some of these patients. In higher doses, positive inotropic agents have been shown to increase mortality when used alone in subsets with advanced heart failure. Preliminary data suggest that the combination of low-dose phosphodiesterase inhibitors and a beta-blocker may be better tolerated and does not appear to be associated with the adverse effects of either therapy used alone. We discuss the theoretic underpinning of this approach and the supportive clinical data.

Combined oral positive inotropic and beta-blocker therapy for treatment of refractory class IV heart failure

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the effects of combined oral positive inotropic and beta-blocker therapy in patients with severe heart failure.

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe, class IV heart failure who receive standard medical therapy exhibit a 1-year mortality rate >50%. Moreover, such patients generally do not tolerate beta-blockade, a promising new therapy for chronic heart failure. Positive inotropes, including phosphodiesterase inhibitors, are associated with increased mortality when administered over the long term in these patients. The addition of a beta-blocker to positive inotropic therapy might attenuate this adverse effect, although long-term oral inotropic therapy might serve as a bridge to beta-blockade.

METHODS

Thirty patients with severe heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 17.2+/-1.2%, cardiac index 1.6+/-0.1 liter/min per m2) were treated with the combination of oral enoximone (a phosphodiesterase inhibitor) and oral metoprolol at two institutions. Enoximone was given at a dose of < or = 1 mg/kg body weight three times a day. After clinical stabilization, metoprolol was initiated at 6.25 mg twice a day and slowly titrated up to a target dose of 100 to 200 mg/day.

RESULTS

Ninety-six percent of the patients tolerated enoximone, whereas 80% tolerated the addition of metoprolol. The mean duration of combination therapy was 9.4+/-1.8 months. The mean length of follow-up was 20.9+/-3.9 months. Of the 23 patients receiving the combination therapy, 48% were weaned off enoximone over the long term. The LVEF increased significantly, from 17.7+/-1.6% to 27.6+/-3.4% (p=0.01), whereas the New York Heart Association functional class improved from 4+/-0 to 2.8+/-0.1 (p=0.0001). The number of hospital admissions tended to decrease during therapy (p=0.06). The estimated probability of survival at 1 year was 81+/-9%. Heart transplantation was performed successfully in nine patients (30%).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with a positive inotrope and a beta-blocker appears to be useful in the treatment of severe, class IV heart failure. It may be used as a palliative measure when transplantation is not an option or as a bridge to heart transplantation. Further study of this form of combined therapy is warranted.