The effect of vasopressin treatment on learning in Down's syndrome

Potential clinical applications of current and future oral forms of desmopressin (Review)

Desmopressin is a synthetic analogue of vasopressin and a selective vasopressin receptor 2 agonist. It was first synthesised in 1967 and utilised for its antidiuretic properties. It is also used in bleeding disorders to enhance clotting. Other potential uses of the drug have been reported. The present review aims to provide a broad overview of the literature on potential further uses of oral forms of desmopressin. Key therapeutic areas of interest were identified based on known physiological activities/targets of desmopressin or reports of an effect of desmopressin in the literature. The feasibility of adequate dosing with oral forms of the drug was also considered. Systematic literature searches were carried out using the silvi.ai software for the identified areas, and summaries of available papers were included in tables and discussed. The results of the searches showed that desmopressin has been investigated for its efficacy in a number of areas, including bleeding control, renal colic, the central nervous system and oncology. Evidence suggests that oral desmopressin may have the potential to be of clinical benefit for renal colic and bleeding control in particular. However, further research is needed to clarify its effect in these areas, including randomised controlled studies and studies specifically of oral formulations (and doses). Further research may also yield findings for cancer, cognition and overactive bladder.

Pharmacological interventions to improve cognition and adaptive functioning in Down syndrome: Strides to date

Although an increasing number of clinical trials have been developed for cognition in Down syndrome, there has been limited success to date in identifying effective interventions. This review describes the progression from pre-clinical studies with mouse models to human clinical trials research using pharmacological interventions to improve cognition and adaptive functioning in Down syndrome. We also provide considerations for investigators when conducting human clinical trials and describe strategies for the pharmaceutical industry to advance the field in drug discovery for Down syndrome. Future research focusing on earlier pharmaceutical interventions, development of appropriate outcome measures, and greater collaboration between industry, academia, advocacy, and regulatory groups will be important for addressing limitations from prior studies and developing potential effective interventions for cognition in Down syndrome.

Pharmacological interventions for cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome

BACKGROUND

People with Down syndrome are vulnerable to developing dementia at an earlier age than the general population. Alzheimer's disease and cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome can place a significant burden on both the person with Down syndrome and their family and carers. Various pharmacological interventions, including donepezil, galantamine, memantine and rivastigmine, appear to have some effect in treating cognitive decline in people without Down syndrome, but their effectiveness for those with Down syndrome remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of anti-dementia pharmacological interventions and nutritional supplements for treating cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome.

SEARCH METHODS

In January 2015, we searched CENTRAL, ALOIS (the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group), Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, seven other databases, and two trials registers. In addition, we checked the references of relevant reviews and studies and contacted study authors, other researchers and relevant drug manufacturers to identify additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-dementia pharmacological interventions or nutritional supplements for adults (aged 18 years and older) with Down syndrome, in which treatment was administered and compared with either placebo or no treatment.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias of included trials and extracted the relevant data. Review authors contacted study authors to obtain missing information where necessary.

MAIN RESULTS

Only nine studies (427 participants) met the inclusion criteria for this review. Four of these (192 participants) assessed the effectiveness of donepezil, two (139 participants) assessed memantine, one (21 participants) assessed simvastatin, one study (35 participants) assessed antioxidants, and one study (40 participants) assessed acetyl-L-carnitine.Five studies focused on adults aged 45 to 55 years, while the remaining four studies focused on adults aged 20 to 29 years. Seven studies were conducted in either the USA or UK, one between Norway and the UK, and one in Japan. Follow-up periods in studies ranged from four weeks to two years. The reviewers judged all included studies to be at low or unclear risk of bias.Analyses indicate that for participants who received donepezil, scores in measures of cognitive functioning (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.27 to 1.13) and measures of behaviour (SMD 0.42, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.89) were similar to those who received placebo. However, participants who received donepezil were significantly more likely to experience an adverse event (odds ratio (OR) 0.32, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.62). The quality of this body of evidence was low. None of the included donepezil studies reported data for carer stress, institutional/home care, or death.For participants who received memantine, scores in measures of cognitive functioning (SMD 0.05, 95% CI -0.43 to 0.52), behaviour (SMD -0.17, 95% CI -0.46 to 0.11), and occurrence of adverse events (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.17) were similar to those who received placebo. The quality of this body of evidence was low. None of the included memantine studies reported data for carer stress, institutional/home care, or death.Due to insufficient data, it was possible to provide a narrative account only of the outcomes for simvastatin, antioxidants, and acetyl-L-carnitine. Results from one pilot study suggest that participants who received simvastatin may have shown a slight improvement in cognitive measures.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Due to the low quality of the body of evidence in this review, it is difficult to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of any pharmacological intervention for cognitive decline in people with Down syndrome.

Clinical trials in children with Down syndrome: Issues from a cognitive research perspective

Clinical and translational research play a key role in the transition of basic research discoveries to effective therapies. In Down syndrome (DS), these research approaches are not well utilized or developed to test new therapies to improve cognitive and/or adaptive function in this population. This article reviews the history of clinical trial research in children with DS from a cognitive research perspective and discusses important issues relevant to the conduct of well designed clinical trials for this population. Specific issues addressed include: funding, study design, study medication, subject recruitment and retention, safety, and efficacy challenges. The Duke Down Syndrome Research Team's program of clinical research of cholinesterase inhibitors for individuals with DS serves as the model application for the identified research principles. It is hoped that this article will raise awareness of the unmet need for clinical research in the cognitive and adaptive function of individuals with DS, especially children with DS.

Complementary and alternative therapies for Down syndrome

In their role as committed advocates, parents of children with Down syndrome have always sought alternative therapies, mainly to enhance cognitive function but also to improve their appearance. Nutritional supplements have been the most frequent type of complementary and alternative therapy used. Cell therapy, plastic surgery, hormonal therapy, and a host of other therapies such as massage therapy have been used. There is a lack of well-designed scientific studies on the use of alternative therapies in individuals with Down syndrome. Antioxidants hold theoretical promise for treatment of the cognitive, immune, malignancy, and premature aging problems associated with Down syndrome. Medications for treatment of Alzheimer's disease may also result in benefit for the population of individuals with Down syndrome.

Vasopressin and vasopressin analogues for treatment of memory disorders in clinical practice

1. Beyond its antidiuretic and vasopressor effects, vasopressin has central nervous system effects, first described in rats by David de Wied in 1965. 2. Its first clinical use in humans, in 1978, confirmed its stimulant action in normal individuals, especially in middle-aged male subjects. 3. Its utility in mnemic problems is also worht considering when the pathology is relatively recent (less than 2 years prior) and unaccompanied by major neurological lesions. Behavioral modifications, such as improvement of "sociability", "mood" improvement, independent of its effects on memory have been described, and would justify complementary clinical investigation. 4. New synthetic vasopressin derivatives which would eliminate metabolic effects while maintaining behavioral effects intact, and the definition of clinical, neuroendocrine, and neurophysiological prognostic criteria, will be the two most important paths for investigation over the next years.

Vasopressin and related peptides: animal and human studies

In animals, vasopressin and related peptides are present in specific neuronal pathways in the brain and modulate brain processes. It has been suggested that in particular memory processes, including consolidation and retrieval, short and long term memories are facilitated by vasopressin. Evidence has been presented that endogenous vasopressin is involved in these processes. But also other effects of these peptides e.g. an attenuation of acquisition of heroin self-administration have been reported. Vasopressin and related peptides have been administered to humans in a number of studies including volunteers and various patient populations with and without complaints about memory. Beneficial effects on several aspects of memory, learning, attention and concentration have been found, but not in all studies. Patients with severe deficits seem to benefit less from the peptide treatment. This may be related to the amount of brain damage. Beneficial effects of vasopressin treatment have been reported in schizophrenics and heroin addicts. In addition effects on social behavior, energy and mood of certain patients have been noted. The target patient population for vasopressin neuropeptide is thus not yet well defined. With respect to cognitive disorders, sophisticated neuropsychological test procedures, including information-processing tasks, may contribute to define such a patient population. These tasks may also be applied for treatment evaluation. It should however be kept in mind that other interesting influences of vasopressin e.g. on social behavior, mood and addictive behavior, may also appear of clinical significance. Future studies in humans may yield more detailed information in this respect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)