SDZ PSD 958, a novel D1 receptor antagonist with potential limbic selectivity

In Vivo Systems Response Profiling and Multivariate Classification of CNS Active Compounds: A Structured Tool for CNS Drug Discovery

This paper describes the application of in vivo systems response profiling in CNS drug discovery by a process referred to as the Integrative Screening Process. The biological response profile, treated as an array, is used as major outcome for selection of candidate drugs. Dose-response data, including ex vivo brain monoaminergic biomarkers and behavioral descriptors, are systematically collected and analyzed by principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least-squares (PLS) regression, yielding multivariate characterization across compounds. The approach is exemplified by assessing a new class of CNS active compounds, the dopidines, compared to other monoamine modulating compounds including antipsychotics, antidepressants, and procognitive agents. Dopidines display a distinct phenotypic profile which has prompted extensive further preclinical and clinical investigations. In summary, in vivo profiles of CNS compounds are mapped, based on dose response studies in the rat. Applying a systematic and standardized work-flow, a database of in vivo systems response profiles is compiled, enabling comparisons and classification. This creates a framework for translational mapping, a crucial component in CNS drug discovery.

The role of alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonism in the anti-cataleptic properties of the atypical neuroleptic agent, clozapine, in the rat

1. The mechanism underlying the anticataleptic properties of the atypical neuroleptic agent, clozapine, has been investigated in the rat. 2.The close structural analogues of clozapine, loxapine (0.1 mg kg(-1) s.c.) and iso-clozapine (1 and 3 mg kg(-1) s.c.) induced catalepsy in rats. In contrast, clozapine and the regio-isomer of loxapine, iso-loxapine (up to 10 mg kg(-1) s.c.) did not produce catalepsy, but at a dose of 1 mg kg(-1) significantly inhibited catalepsy induced by loxapine (0.3 mg kg(-1) s.c.). 3. Radioligand binding assays showed that cataleptogenic potential was most clearly predicted by the D2/5-HT1A, D2/5-HT1B/1D and D2/alpha2-receptor affinity (KD) ratios: i.e. 30-100-fold higher ratios were calculated for loxapine and iso-clozapine, whereas the ratios were less than 1 for clozapine and iso-loxapine. The ratios of affinities for D2 to 5-HT2A, 5-HT2C or D1 did not reflect the grouping of cataleptic and non-cataleptic compounds. 4. Co-treatment with the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonists, yohimbine (1-10 mg kg(-1) s.c.), RX 821002 (1-10 mg kg(-1) s.c.) and MK-912 (0.3 and 1 mg kg(-1) s.c.) dose-dependently inhibited the cataleptic response to loxapine (0.3 mg kg(-1)). Yohimbine (1-10 mg kg(-1) s.c.) also dose-dependently inhibited the cateleptic response to haloperidol (0.3 mg kg(-1) s.c.). The alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonists had no effect per se. 5. Neither yohimbine (10 mg kg(-1)) nor RX821002 (3 mg kg(-1)) altered the cataleptic response to the D1 receptor antagonist, SCH 23390 (1 mg kg(-1) s.c.), while, like clozapine, both compounds abolished the response to the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, MDL 100,151 (3 mg kg(-1) s.c.). 6. The present data strongly implicate alpha2-adrenoceptor blockade in the anticataleptic properties of clozapine and suggest that its lack of extrapyramidal side effects in the clinic may also be a consequence of this property.

MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion: differential effects of M100907, SDZ PSD 958 and raclopride

The influence of three selective monoamine receptor antagonists on spontaneous locomotion and on the hyperlocomotion induced by the un-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist [+]-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo-[a,d]-cyclohepten-5,10-imine hydrogen maleate (MK-801; dizocilpine) was investigated. The selective and potent 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A receptor antagonist R(+)-alpha(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-[2(4-fluorophenyl)ethyl)]-4-piperidine -methanol (MDL100,907; M100907) displayed a clear-cut selectivity for reduction of MK-801-induced as compared to spontaneous locomotion, in that the former was dose-dependently (0.001, 0.01, 0.1 mg/kg i.p.) blocked and even totally abolished by the highest dose, while the latter was only modestly affected. Even at high doses of M100907 (up to 9 mg/kg i.p.), spontaneous locomotion was not reduced below 40% of control. The selective dopamine D1 receptor antagonist (-)-[4aR, 10 aR]-1,2,3,4,4a,5,10,10a-octahydro-4-(4-chloro-2-methyl-phenyl)-1-methyl- benzo[g]quinoxaline-6-ol (SDZ PSD 958; 0.017, 0.15, 1.35 mg/kg i.p.) decreased both spontaneous and MK-801-induced locomotion with a slight preference for the latter; spontaneous locomotion was dose-dependently diminished to approx. 10% of controls (at 8 mg/kg i.p.). The dopamine D2 receptor antagonist raclopride ([(-)-(S)-3,5-dichloro-N-((1-ethyl-2-pyrrolidinyl) methyl)-6-methoxy-salicylamide tartrate]; 0.11, 0.33, 1.0 mg/kg i.p.) reduced both MK-801-induced and spontaneous locomotion to a similar extent. An orthogonal matrix experimental design, and multiple regression, were used to evaluate the effects of several combinations of different doses of the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist and the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist. No synergistic actions on reduction of spontaneous or MK-801-induced locomotion were detected between M100907 and SDZ PSD 958. If the hyperlocomotion elicited by acutely administered MK-801 is a valid model of at least some aspects of schizophrenia, these results indicate that the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist M100907 will have efficacy in treating this condition. The lack of effect on spontaneous locomotion, suggests that M100907, compared to dopamine receptor antagonists, will be less prone to induce psychomotor side-effects. Ongoing clinical studies will hopefully give the answers in the near future.

Effects of dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptors on intraocular pressure in conscious rabbits

This investigation was designed as a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked, crossover study in NZW rabbits with normal intraocular pressure (IOP) to investigate dopaminergic effects on IOP. SKF 38393, a selective D1-receptor agonist, increased, and SDZ PSD-958, a selective D1-receptor antagonist, decreased IOP, respectively. The selective D2-receptor agonist quinpirole decreased IOP, whereas the selective D2 receptor antagonist metoclopramide had no significant effect. Combinations of quinpirole with SDZ PSD-958 decreased IOP in an additive manner. SDZ GLC-756, a mixed D1-receptor antagonist/D2-receptor agonist, decreased IOP in a dose-dependent manner with a maximum effect greater than the maximum effects produced either by the D1-receptor antagonist SDZ PSD-958 and the D2-receptor agonist quinpirole. The effect of SDZ GLC-756 could only be partially blocked by the selective D2-receptor antagonist metoclopramide suggesting that both D1-receptor blockade and D2-receptor stimulation participate in its IOP-lowering effect. Tonography suggests that SDZ GLC-756 has no significant effect on outflow facility. Furthermore, the results suggest that both D1 and D2 receptors each play an independent role in the regulation of IOP in rabbits. Thus, simultaneous blockade of D1 receptors and stimulation of D2 receptors may provide a new pharmacological approach for the treatment of ocular hypertension frequently associated with glaucoma.