[Measles, mumps and rubella vaccination status of school beginners in Munich]

Addressing issues of vaccination literacy and psychological empowerment in the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination decision-making: a qualitative study

Background

Whether or not to vaccinate one’s child is one of the first health-related decisions parents have to make after their child’s birth. For the past 20 years, the share of parents choosing not to immunize their children has increased in many countries, for various reasons. Among these, rumors affirming that vaccinations contain dangerous chemicals or might trigger severe chronic diseases have negatively affected parental attitudes towards pediatric immunizations, particularly the vaccination against measles, mumps and rubella (MMR), raising a number of public health concerns. The primary aim of this qualitative study is to understand what drives parents’ decision, giving special attention to vaccination literacy and psychological empowerment in such a context.

Methods

Twenty individual semi-structured interviews were conducted in the Canton of Ticino (Switzerland) between January and June 2014. Participants were either mothers or fathers of children less than 1 year old living in Switzerland. An inductive thematic analysis was performed to identify the main themes with regard to vaccination literacy and psychological empowerment in the MMR vaccination decision-making.

Results

Parents’ reports yielded four main themes: (a) the paradox of the free choice, referring to the misinterpretation of current vaccination policies; (b) giving up the power, pointing at the outcomes of a low perceived competence; (c) a far-reaching decision, reflecting the importance attributed to the MMR choice and the different levels of impact the decision can have; (d) the demand for shared-decision making, referring to the parental needs in relation to the child’s healthcare provider.

Conclusion

Understanding what drives parents’ management of their children’s immunization schedule in terms of vaccination literacy and psychological empowerment can help health professionals to communicate more effectively with parents in order to facilitate an informed decision, and stakeholders to design tailored health education programs and materials. This can ultimately help increase the coverage of the MMR vaccination.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-2200-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

[Risk factors for delayed or missed measles vaccination in young children]

Because of low measles vaccine coverage rates, measles outbreaks have been observed several times during recent years in Germany. The aim of this study is to identify parents' attitudes and beliefs towards immunisations and socio-economic factors which are associated with delayed or missed first measles vaccination in young children. We used data from a representative German-wide immunisation survey on 2116 children born between 1 January 2002 and December 2004 by collecting precise vaccination information from vaccination cards. The influence of socio-economic determinants and parental attitudes towards immunisations on the timing of the first measles dose was analysed by using multivariable Cox regression. Of these children 46.8% (95% CI: 44.5-49.1) received their first measles dose according to the recommendations of the standing committee on vaccination (STIKO) by month 15. In multivariable analysis, fathers aged 28-33 years and birth order as well as parents' belief in homeopathy and other parental attitudes indicating lack of knowledge about the importance of vaccinations significantly influenced an early immunisation. Not general opposition, but insufficient parental knowledge about the harmfulness of measles infection seemed to be responsible for the low measles vaccination rates.

A hierarchical analysis of social determinants of measles vaccination coverage in Austrian schoolchildren

BACKGROUND

Numerous socio-economic and demographic factors have been identified as being associated with low vaccination coverage in children. However, the complex interrelation between these factors is not fully understood. We focused our study on the less well-established associations of familial resources for child care with vaccination coverage and their interrelationship with socio-demographic factors.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study (n = 2386) focuses on parental social status and on resources for child care as determinants of measles vaccination coverage of schoolchildren aged 6-13 years in Styria, Austria. In order to reveal the relationships among these factors, an analysis based on a conceptual hierarchical model was performed. The so-called graphical modelling approach was used for the multivariate analysis of the hierarchically structured determinants.

RESULTS

The findings indicate that vaccination coverage is directly associated with a large number of children in the family (P < 0.0001) and directly as well as indirectly associated with a low level of education of the father (P < 0.001). All other included child-care resources are only indirectly associated with a low coverage, whereby the number of children acts as main mediating factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that vaccination programmes should mainly focus on families with many children or parents of low educational level and not on the whole population.

Determinants of childhood vaccination coverage in Kazakhstan in a period of societal change: Implications for vaccination policies

After the fall of the Soviet Union countries in Central Asia have undergone large changes. In Kazakhstan the vaccination coverage decreased between 1990 and 1995, which resulted in an increased incidence of some vaccine-preventable diseases, e.g. diphtheria and measles. In this study we examined which factors affected the vaccination status of children in Kazakhstan and whether they resemble patterns observed in developing or developed countries. We found a mixed pattern of risk factors, consistent with the status of Kazakhstan as a transitional economy. Especially prominent was the relatively high education of the women and good access to the medical care system.

Vaccination rates in a multicultural population

AIMS

To establish whether there are social or cultural groups of children in Amsterdam with relatively low vaccination coverage for diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, and poliomyelitis (DPTP), and for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR).

METHODS

All of the 57,382 children aged between 5 and 12 years and living in Amsterdam on 1 January 2003 were analysed with respect to vaccination and sociodemographic data collected routinely by the Department of Child Health Care. The State Vaccination Programme (SVP) guidelines were adhered to in order to determine vaccination status.

RESULTS

The overall respective DPTP and MMR vaccination rates were 93.0% and 93.9%. No great differences in vaccination levels were found between depressed and affluent areas or between the children of Dutch and non-Dutch mothers. However, foreign children who had been born abroad (Surinam, Morocco, Turkey) were most likely not to have been fully vaccinated. Children who attended anthroposophical schools were also found to be considerably less frequently fully immunised than those at other types of schools.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccination coverage for children domiciled in Amsterdam was very high. Nevertheless, there are groups where the vaccination level is relatively low and social contact is high.

[How do pediatricians vaccinate in Munich? A health care epidemiological study]

OBJECTIVES

The goal was to determine vaccination rates and predictors of vaccination behaviour of pediatricians in Munich, Germany.

METHODS

Standardised questionnaires were sent to all 133 office-based pediatricians in Munich.

RESULTS

97 questionnaires (73%) were returned completely. Vaccination rates were sufficiently against diphtheria, tetanus, and poliomyelitis only. The other vaccinations recommended by the national immunisation advisory board (STIKO) were carried out to an insufficient extent. Vaccination rates of measles, mumps, and rubella were low. Parents' informed consent to STIKO's recommendations was the main determining factor of vaccination rates. Physicians' uncertainty in assessing contra-indications correctly was another important reason for insufficient vaccination rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The health target of eliminating measles will not likely be reached. STIKO's recommendations as well as periodically vocational training courses, should be more compulsory to physicians. Self-responsibility of patients and parents should be raised by financial incentives on sick funds premiums.