Granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor augments the induction of antibodies, especially anti-idiotypic antibodies, to therapeutic monoclonal antibodies

EpCAM an immunotherapeutic target for gastrointestinal malignancy: current experience and future challenges

Despite advances in surgery and adjuvant regimes, gastrointestinal malignancy remains a major cause of neoplastic mortality. Immunotherapy is an emerging and now successful treatment modality for numerous cancers that relies on the manipulation of the immune system and its effector functions to eradicate tumour cells. The discovery that the pan-epithelial homotypic cell adhesion molecule EpCAM is differentially expressed on gastrointestinal tumours has made this a viable target for immunotherapy. Clinical trials using naked anti EpCAM antibody, immunoconjugates, anti-idiotypic and dendritic cell vaccines have met variable success. The murine IgG2a Edrecolomab was shown to reduce mortality and morbidity at a level slightly lower than treatment with 5FU and Levamisole when administered to patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma in a large randomised controlled trial. Fully human and trifunctional antibodies that specifically recruit CD3-positive lymphocytes are now being tested clinically in the treatment of minimal residual disease and ascites. Although clinical trials are in their infancy, the future may bring forth an EpCAM mediated approach for the effective activation and harnessing of the immune system to destroy a pathological aberrance that has otherwise largely escaped its attention.

Using antibodies in tumour immunotherapy

The role of antibodies as therapeutic cancer vaccines includes two distinct approaches, which are summarised in this review, namely anti-idiotypic vaccines and antigen-antibody complex therapies. Bispecific antibodies directed against T cells or antigen-presenting cells are also referenced. The report focuses on theoretical issues, laboratory data on the mechanism of action, examples of humoral and cellular immune induction, and novel therapeutic advances in vaccine development. The biology of antigen processing and recent advances in the field of dendritic cell biology are critical to understanding the potent immune response induction. Future directions include combination therapies to manipulate immune regulatory mechanisms and to enhance clinical effects. Additional applications of antibodies targeting costimulatory or regulatory receptors on antigen-presenting cells and T cells, neutralising immune suppressive cytokines, and depleting T regulatory cells hold promise for future mono- and particularly combination therapies.

Immunization of colorectal cancer patients with recombinant baculovirus-derived KSA (Ep-CAM) formulated with monophosphoryl lipid A in liposomal emulsion, with and without granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

KSA (Ep-CAM) is highly expressed by colorectal cancers. The safety and immunologic effects of a vaccine consisting of recombinant baculovirus-derived KSA formulated with monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL) in liposomes and emulsified in mineral oil were evaluated, with and without co-administration of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Eleven patients with metastatic colorectal cancer received three subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of the vaccine at 4-week intervals. Six patients were randomized to also receive human recombinant GM-CSF (rGM-CSF) by subcutaneous injection daily for 4 days with each vaccination. Immunizations with and without rGM-CSF were well tolerated. Seven of the 11 patients developed significant KSA-specific cellular immune responses as assessed by lymphoproliferation and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) ELISPOT assays. All nine tested patients developed positive delayed type hypersensitivity reactions. Eight of the 11 patients developed KSA-specific antibody responses. The highest levels of cellular immune responses were observed in patients who received GM-CSF. Immunization with baculovirus-derived KSA formulated with monophosphoryl lipid A in liposomal emulsion is safe and can elicit KSA-specific immune responses. Co-administration of GM-CSF with this formulation is an effective method of generating KSA-specific T-helper (Th) 1-associated cellular immune responses.

Abrogation of the Hematological and Biological Activities of the Interleukin-3/Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Fusion Protein PIXY321 by Neutralizing Anti-PIXY321 Antibodies in Cancer Patients Receiving High-Dose Carboplatin

This dose-escalation study was performed to evaluate the hematologic activity, biological effects, immunogenicity, and toxicity of PIXY321 (an interleukin-3/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor fusion protein) administered after high-dose carboplatin (CBDCA) treatment. Patients with advanced cancers received CBDCA at 800 mg/m2 intravenously on day 0 of repeated 28-day cycles. In part A of the study, patients were treated with CBDCA alone during cycle 1 and then received PIXY321 on days 1 through 18 of cycle 2 and later cycles. In part B, patients received 18 days of PIXY321 beginning on day 1 of all CBDCA cycles, including cycle 1. PIXY321 was administered subcutaneously in 2 divided doses. Total doses of 135, 250, 500, 750, and 1,000 μg/m2/d were administered to successive cohorts of 3 to 6 patients in part A. In part B, patient groups received PIXY321 doses of 750, 1,000, and 1,250 μg/m2/d. The hematologic effects of PIXY321 were assessed in the first 2 cycles of therapy. Anti-PIXY321 antibody formation was assessed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and neutralization assay. Of the 49 patients enrolled, 31 were fully evaluable for hematologic efficacy. When comparing the first B cycle (cycle B-1; with PIXY321) with the first A cycle (cycle A-1; without PIXY321), the fusion protein had no significant effect on platelet nadirs or duration of platelets less than 20,000/μL but was able to speed the time of recovery of platelet counts to 100,000/μL (15v 20 days; P = .01). Significant improvements in neutrophil nadir and duration of ANC less than 500 were observed in cycles A-2 and B-1 (with PIXY321) as compared with cycle A-1 (without PIXY321). Initial PIXY321 prophylaxis (cycle A-2 and cycle B-1), enhanced the recovery of ANC to greater than 1,500/μL by an average of at least 8 days as compared with cycle A-1 (without PIXY321;P ≤ .004). However, positive PIXY321 hematologic effects were lost in the second course of PIXY321 among patients treated in part B. ELISA analysis showed that 92% of patients had developed neutralizing anti-PIXY321 antibodies by the completion of 2 PIXY321-containing cycles. The incidental action of PIXY321 to depress serum cholesterol levels was also abrogated during cycle B-2. We conclude that PIXY321 was active in speeding hematologic recovery but that neutralizing anti-PIXY321 antibody formation suppressed the hematologic and biochemical effects by the second cycle of PIXY321 administration. The immunogenicity of this fusion protein provides a cautionary warning that clinical development of bioengineered human molecules requires thorough testing for immune neutralization.

Augmentation of the immune response with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and other hematopoietic growth factors

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor is by far the most widely used hematopoietic growth factor to augment immune responses. At present, the best secured effect is as an adjuvant cytokine for vaccination. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor can be delivered as gene-transduced tumor cells, as plasmid DNA, or as the soluble free granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor protein. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor must be present at the same site as the vaccine component. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor may also augment the effect of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies by enhancing various effector functions such as antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and amplifying an idiotypic network response (i.e., antitumor immunity). It may also be advantageous to combine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with monoclonal antibodies (neutrophil and monocyte antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity) for tumor therapy. However, these growth factors might also induce immune suppression, which may hamper the contemplated effect of the growth factor. It is urgently warranted to better understand these dual effects on the immune system so that we can find optimal uses for the growth factors in various clinical settings.

Edrecolomab (monoclonal antibody 17-1A)

Edrecolomab is a mouse-derived monoclonal IgG2a antibody. It recognises the human tumour-associated antigen CO17-1A which is expressed on the cell surface of a wide variety of tumours and normal epithelial tissue. Edrecolomab is thought to destroy tumour cells by activating an array of endogenous cytotoxic mechanisms, including antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity and possibly antibody-dependent complement-mediated cytotoxicity. Edrecolomab may induce antitumour activity indirectly by inducing a host anti-idiotypic antibody response. Adjuvant therapy with edrecolomab (500 mg initial dose followed by four 100 mg infusions administered at 4-weekly intervals) significantly improved survival and reduced the tumour recurrence rate in patients with resected Dukes' stage C colorectal cancer and minimal residual disease. Data from several small clinical trials suggest that edrecolomab given as monotherapy or in combination with other antineoplastic agents has limited efficacy in the treatment of advanced colorectal or pancreatic tumours. However, results from a small phase I study in patients with advanced breast cancer were more promising. Edrecolomab was generally well tolerated in clinical trials. In a postmarketing surveillance study, the most common adverse events associated with edrecolomab were flushing/erythema and gastrointestinal symptoms including diarrhoea, abdominal pain and nausea and vomiting. Because edrecolomab is of murine origin, anaphylactic reactions have developed in some patients treated with the drug.

New drugs in the treatment of colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin has been the unofficial standard therapy for patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) for more than a decade; however, the optimal dose and schedule remain a matter of debate. Recently several new drugs have shown activity in this disease. These include irinotecan (CPT-11); oxaliplatin; the thymidylate synthase inhibitors raltitrexed, uracil/tegafur (UFT), capecitabine, and S-1; the biochemical modulators trimetrexate and 5-ethynyluracil; and the monoclonal antibody 17-1A.

METHODS

The results of clinical trials with these and other new agents, as well as their current status and main characteristics, were reviewed.

RESULTS

Several of these agents, some with a novel mechanism of action, show promising activity in CRC. In combination with 5-FU and leucovorin, trimetrexate showed encouraging response rates in Phase II studies. Other interesting agents include capecitabine, UFT, and S-1. The biochemical modulator 5-ethynyluracil may allow the oral administration of 5-FU; however, results of Phase II clinical trials are not yet available. CPT-11 is in the most advanced stage of development and, based on consistent data generated in extensive Phase II studies, currently appears to be a reasonable choice for 5-FU-resistant or refractory disease. Another promising agent is oxaliplatin, which showed activity as first-line and second-line treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Several new agents have shown promise in the treatment of CRC, and changes in the standard treatment of advanced or high risk CRC appear likely in the near future.

Natural and therapeutically-induced antibodies to cytokines

Serum samples obtained from non-immunocompromised patients treated therapeutically with recombinant cytokines (e.g. Il-1alpha; Il-1beta; Il-2 to Il-18; IFNalpha; GM-CSF; G-CSF; etc.) often reveal the presence of high affinity anti-cytokine antibodies. Antibody Fab binding in a saturable manner by ELISA and RIA or western immunoblotting prove their specificity. Antibody level often increases in these patients with repeated cytokine administration, suggesting boosts of antigen stimulation. However, the appearance in circulation of auto-antibodies to exogenous cytokine is not always associated with a decreased clinical response to therapy. The demonstration that non-neutralizing auto-antibodies to several natural cytokines can be found even in sera of normal healthy individuals never treated before with cytokines and particularly during the last trimester of pregnancy and in cord-blood, suggests that these naturally- occurring and therapeutically-induced auto-antibodies may exert different functions, not only as inhibitors or antagonists but also as beneficial physiological cytokine carriers or regulators of their activity.

Diagnostic and therapeutic applications of monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

The study contained herein was undertaken to review and summarize the current literature on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

Limitations of traditional imaging techniques have encouraged development of targeted imaging strategies using radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies. Diagnostic immunoscintigraphy can detect lesions not identified by conventional imaging modalities, although it has not proven useful in the management of primary colorectal cancers and in hepatic metastases. Immunoscintigraphy shows promise in cases of local recurrence and rising carcinoembryonic antigen values; however, the impact of immunoscintigraphy on clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness remains unproven. Radioimmunoguided surgery has been advocated as a method of more accurately detecting tumor extension and accomplishing radical resection. The technique remains controversial, and its use is not widespread. With respect to therapeutic applications, immunotherapy has most often been investigated in the setting of advanced stage disease. Results in this setting have been poor. In contrast, adjuvant immunotherapy after resection of Dukes C carcinoma has achieved convincing results, with improvements in survival comparable with that of adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant trials are now under way to examine the effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies in the postoperative treatment of early-stage (II) tumors and the combination of monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapy in advanced-stage (III) tumors. Bispecific antibodies, or immunoconjugates with cytokines or toxins, represent additional areas of interest and future investigations.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, immunoscintigraphy is not sufficient to determine, by itself, resectability of colorectal tumor and has limited usefulness in select cases of recurrent cancer and possibly in cases of rising carcinoembryonic antigen values. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies as a postoperative adjuvant treatment shows promise and is currently being investigated in national trials.