Effect of cisapride on gastric emptying in dyspeptic patients

WITHDRAWN: Pharmacological interventions for non-ulcer dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

The commonest cause of upper gastrointestinal symptoms is non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and yet the pathophysiology of this condition has been poorly characterised and the optimum treatment is uncertain. It is estimated that £450 million is spent on dyspepsia drugs in the UK each year.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to determine the effectiveness of six classes of drugs (antacids, histamine H2 antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, prokinetics, mucosal protecting agents and antimuscarinics) in the improvement of either the individual or global dyspepsia symptom scores and also quality of life scores patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2006), EMBASE (1988 to January 2006), CINAHL (1982 to January 2006), SIGLE, and reference lists of articles. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies. Trials were located through electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SIGLE, using appropriate subject headings and text words, searching bibliographies of retrieved articles, and through contacts with experts in the fields of dyspepsia and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing drugs of any of the six groups with each other or with placebo for non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 73 trials: prokinetics (19 trials with dichotomous outcomes evaluating 3178 participants; relative risk reduction (RRR) 33%; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 18% to 45%), H(2)RAs (12 trials evaluating 2,183 participants; RRR 23%; 95% CI 8% to 35%) and PPIs (10 trials evaluating 3,347 participants; RRR 13%; 95% CI 4% to 20%) were significantly more effective than placebo. Bismuth salts (six trials evaluating 311 participants; RRR 40%; 95% CI -3 to 65%) were superior to placebo but this was of marginal statistical significance. Antacids (one trial evaluating 109 participants; RRR -2%; 95% CI -36% to 24%) and sucralfate (two trials evaluating 246 participants; RRR 29%; 95% CI -40% to 64%) were not statistically significantly superior to placebo. A funnel plot suggested that the prokinetic results could be due to publication bias or other small study effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that anti-secretory therapy may be effective in NUD. The trials evaluating prokinetic therapy are difficult to interpret as the meta-analysis result could have been due to publication bias. The effect of these drugs is likely to be small and many patients will need to take them on a long-term basis so economic analyses would be helpful and ideally the therapies assessed need to be inexpensive and well tolerated.

Pharmacological interventions for non-ulcer dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

The commonest cause of upper gastrointestinal symptoms is non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and yet the pathophysiology of this condition has been poorly characterised and the optimum treatment is uncertain. It is estimated that pound450 million is spent on dyspepsia drugs in the UK each year.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to determine the effectiveness of six classes of drugs (antacids, histamine H(2) antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, prokinetics, mucosal protecting agents and antimuscarinics) in the improvement of either the individual or global dyspepsia symptom scores and also quality of life scores patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to January 2006), EMBASE (1988 to January 2006), CINAHL (1982 to January 2006), SIGLE, and reference lists of articles. We also contacted experts in the field and pharmaceutical companies. Trials were located through electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SIGLE, using appropriate subject headings and text words, searching bibliographies of retrieved articles, and through contacts with experts in the fields of dyspepsia and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing drugs of any of the six groups with each other or with placebo for non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility, trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 73 trials: prokinetics (19 trials with dichotomous outcomes evaluating 3178 participants; relative risk reduction (RRR) 33%; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 18% to 45%), H(2)RAs (12 trials evaluating 2,183 participants; RRR 23%; 95% CI 8% to 35%) and PPIs (10 trials evaluating 3,347 participants; RRR 13%; 95% CI 4% to 20%) were significantly more effective than placebo. Bismuth salts (six trials evaluating 311 participants; RRR 40%; 95% CI -3 to 65%) were superior to placebo but this was of marginal statistical significance. Antacids (one trial evaluating 109 participants; RRR -2%; 95% CI -36% to 24%) and sucralfate (two trials evaluating 246 participants; RRR 29%; 95% CI -40% to 64%) were not statistically significantly superior to placebo. A funnel plot suggested that the prokinetic results could be due to publication bias or other small study effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that anti-secretory therapy may be effective in NUD. The trials evaluating prokinetic therapy are difficult to interpret as the meta-analysis result could have been due to publication bias. The effect of these drugs is likely to be small and many patients will need to take them on a long-term basis so economic analyses would be helpful and ideally the therapies assessed need to be inexpensive and well tolerated.

Pharmacological interventions for non-ulcer dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

The commonest cause of upper gastrointestinal symptoms is non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD) and yet the pathophysiology of this condition has been poorly characterised and the optimum treatment is uncertain. It is estimated that 450 million pounds is spent on dyspepsia drugs in the UK each year.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to determine the effectiveness of six classes of drugs (antacids, histamine H2 antagonists, proton pump inhibitors, prokinetics, mucosal protecting agents and antimuscarinics) in the improvement of either the individual or global dyspepsia symptom scores and also quality of life scores patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were located through electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and SIGLE, using appropriate subject headings and text words, searching bibliographies of retrieved articles, and through contacts with experts in the fields of dyspepsia and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing drugs of any of the six groups with each other or with placebo for non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were collected on dyspeptic symptom scores either individual or global symptom assessments and also quality of life scores and adverse effects.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 11796 citations were obtained. 157 trials were retrieved and 98 trials fulfilled our eligibility criteria. However, subsequent data extraction was not possible in 31 trials. The final 67 trials were included in the meta-analysis. Prokinetics (14 trials with dichotomous outcomes generating 1053 patients; relative risk reduction [RRR] = 48%; 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 27% to 63%), H2RAs (11 trials generating 2,164 patients; RRR = 22%; 95% CI = 7% to 35%) and PPIs (8 trials generating 3,293 patients; RRR = 14%; 95% CI = 5% to 22%) were significantly more effective than placebo. Bismuth salts (6 trials generating 311 patients; RRR = 40%; 95% CI = -3 to 65%) were superior to placebo but this was of marginal statistical significance. Antacids (one trial generating 109 patients; RRR = -2%; 95% CI = -36% to 24%) and sucralfate (two trials generating 246 patients; RRR = 29%; 95% CI = -40% to 64%) were not statistically significantly superior to placebo. A funnel plot suggested that the prokinetic and H2RA results could be due to publication bias.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that anti-secretory therapy may be effective in NUD. The trials evaluating prokinetic therapy are difficult to interpret as the meta-analysis result could have been due to publication bias. The effect of these drugs is likely to be small and many patients will need to take them on a long-term basis so economic analyses would be helpful and ideally the therapies assessed need to be inexpensive and well tolerated.

Gastric emptying time and the effect of cisapride in cirrhotic patients with autonomic neuropathy

GOALS To investigate the relationships between gastric emptying and autonomic dysfunction in hepatic cirrhosis and to assess the effects of cisapride on gastric emptying in cirrhotic patients. STUDY Twenty-four cirrhotic patients (8 patients in each Child-Pugh classification) and 25 healthy controls were enrolled. All the patients had viral (B or C) hepatitis. Patients with DM, alcoholic cirrhosis, active peptic ulcer, gastric malignancy and pyloric obstruction were excluded by esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Parasympathetic and sympathetic functions were assessed by the criteria set forth by Ewing and Clark. Drugs affecting GI motility and smoking were discontinued 48 hours and 12 hours prior to the study respectively. A solid-phase of gastric emptying study was conducted by scintigraphic method for the calculation of gastric half-emptying time (GET1/2). RESULTS The study revealed that 9 patients with Child-Pugh B and C cirrhosis had autonomic neuropathy and none of Child-Pugh A cirrhosis had autonomic neuropathy. Prolonged GET1/2 was noted in cirrhotics compared with the control group (p < 0.05). However, there was significant difference between 9 patients (Child B-C) with autonomic neuropathy compared with patients 15 patients without autonomic neuropathy. Again there was a significant difference in GET1/2 between Child A cirrhotic and Child B-C cirrhotic whether they had autonomic neuropathy or not. Cisapride decreased GET1/2 significantly in cirrhotic patients (Child B-C cirrhotic). Clearly, patients with autonomic neuropathy in Child B-C cirrhosis had significantly reduced GET1/2 after cisapride administration. Even though cisapride decreased GET1/2 in patients with Child B-C cirrhosis without autonomic neuropathy, this was not significant. CONCLUSION Autonomic neuropathy in advanced cirrhosis from viral hepatitis may cause prolonged gastric emptying. Cisapride can shorten gastric emptying time in such patients.

Pharmacologic interventions in nuclear radiology: indications, imaging protocols, and clinical results

Nuclear radiology is valuable in assessing pathophysiology of a variety of organ systems. Pharmacologic interventions are often employed in radionuclide imaging to monitor the physiologic changes, which in turn facilitate the diagnosis. Metoclopramide, erythromycin, and cisapride have been used for gastric emptying studies. To overcome false-negative results, cimetidine, pentagastrin, and glucagon have been used in imaging of Meckel diverticula. Pharmacologic intervention with either cholecystokinin-8 or morphine is used primarily for the assessment of diseases of the gallbladder, common bile duct, and sphincter of Oddi. Pharmacologic interventions performed during renography include diuretic administration, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, and aspirin renography. Recombinant thyrotropin can be used in patients with previously treated thyroid carcinoma who require lifelong follow-up for recurrent disease. Cardiac pharmacologic stress agents fall into two categories: coronary vasodilating agents, such as dipyridamole and adenosine, and cardiac positive inotropic agents, such as dobutamine and arbutamine. Measurement of hemodynamic responses to pharmacologic flow augmentation with carbon dioxide or acetazolamide is valuable in cerebrovascular perfusion studies.

Effects of mosapride citrate on human plasma levels of motilin, gastrin, somatostatin, and secretin

The effect of mosapride citrate (mosapride) on plasma levels of gastrointestinal peptides (motilin, gastrin, somatostatin, and secretin) was studied in five healthy volunteers. After a single oral administration of mosapride (15 mg), the plasma mosapride level (85.0+/-13.7 ng/ml) was highest in the 60-min sample after the administration and then the plasma level fell. Peak plasma motilin levels (18.6+/-1.7 pg/ml) were achieved 60 min after administration of mosapride (p<0.01 vs. placebo), and returned to baseline levels within a further 120 min. Plasma gastrin levels (42.4+/-3.6 pg/ml) increased 60 min after administration of mosapride (p<0.01 vs. placebo). Plasma somatostatin and secretin levels did not change significantly. These results suggest that the pharmacological effects of mosapride on gastrointestinal functions are closely related to changes in motilin-immunoreactive substance levels in human plasma.

Is rectally administered cisapride an effective prokinetic agent?

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the published data on the efficacy of rectally administered cisapride.

DATA SOURCES

Published double-blind, placebo-controlled trials on rectally administered cisapride identified by MEDLINE (January 1966-December 1998) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (January 1970-December 1998) searches.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Cisapride is an oral prokinetic agent that increases lower esophageal sphincter tone, accelerates gastric emptying, and increases small-bowel motility. Clinical trials of rectal cisapride have used both single- and multiple-dosing regimens. Typically, patients received one or two 30-mg suppositories (provided by the manufacturer). Rectal cisapride was effective in enhancing gastric emptying of solid or semisolid meals in healthy patients or patients with chronic gastric emptying disorders. Rectal cisapride was not effective in antagonizing the gastrointestinal effects of narcotic analgesics or promoting the return of small-bowel activity in adults with postoperative ileus. Mixed results were seen when rectal cisapride was used to promote enteral feedings in patients with persistent ileus.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of rectal cisapride cannot be recommended at this time. Rectal cisapride was effective only in patients who could have otherwise taken either cisapride tablets or suspension but it was not effective in patients who are physically unable to swallow or restricted from ingesting anything orally following surgical procedures. Considering the varied patient populations and evaluation methods used in these studies, the lack of a commercially available cisapride suppository, and absence of studies involving extemporaneously prepared cisapride suppositories, the use of suppositories should be limited to investigational trials.

The effect of a single rectal dose of cisapride on delayed gastric emptying

BACKGROUND

Cisapride has an established prokinetic effect in patients with delayed gastric emptying. However, rectal administration of the drug might be preferred in patients with either dysphagia or nausea due to gastroparesis.

AIM

To determine the effect of a single rectal dose of cisapride 60 mg on gastric emptying in patients with delayed gastric emptying.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients (16 males, 16 females) with demonstrated delayed gastric emptying received a single dose of two suppositories containing either cisapride (2 x 30 mg) or placebo, according to a double-blind randomized crossover design. Three hours after administration of the suppositories, the patients received a radio-labelled test meal and radio-opaque markers for measurement of gastric emptying.

RESULTS

The mean t1/2 after cisapride administration (76 min, 95% CI: 68-95) was significantly shorter (P = 0.005: n = 28, per-protocol analysis) than after placebo administration (104 min, 81-126). Four hours after ingestion of the meal significantly fewer radio-opaque markers remained in the stomach after cisapride than after placebo administration (P < 0.05). Mild to moderate adverse events, mainly involving the gastrointestinal tract, were reported in 10 patients (31%) after cisapride treatment and in four patients (13%) after placebo (N.S.: n = 32).

CONCLUSION

A single suppository dose of cisapride 60 mg significantly accelerates gastric emptying of the solid phase of a meal and of radio-opaque markers in patients with previously demonstrated delayed gastric emptying.

Cisapride in the long-term treatment of chronic gastroparesis: a 2-year open-label study

The effect of long-term cisapride therapy (20 mg orally three times daily for 2 years) on gastric emptying and gastrointestinal symptoms was investigated in 30 patients with severe gastroparesis (24 idiopathic, 6 diabetic). Symptoms were assessed every 2 months, using an overall symptom score based on six symptoms (anorexia, nausea, vomiting, pain, early satiety and bloating), and a 2-year mean overall symptom score was used for analysis. Gastric emptying was measured at 0, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Of the 24 patients who completed the study, 10 showed a significant improvement in gastric emptying (P < 0.05) and felt improved on therapy, seven patients showing a > 20% improvement in overall symptom score compared to baseline. Results for 15 patients who underwent at least one follow-up gastric-emptying test showed only a weak correlation between individual symptom score and gastric emptying (r = 0.40). Thus long-term cisapride therapy at the study dose produced long-term symptomatic improvement in 42% of patients with severe gastroparesis, with sustained acceleration of gastric emptying for up to 2 years.

Cisapride in functional dyspepsia in general practice. A placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Functional dyspepsia is recognized as a common disorder in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and adverse effects of cisapride compared to a placebo in patients from a general practice with functional dyspepsia (FD). Secondly we investigated whether Helicobacter pylori-positive FD patients present with specific symptoms and determined the efficacy of cisapride for FD patients with H. pylori.

METHODS

In a placebo-controlled double-blind study, patients were randomized to receive fixed doses of either cisapride (10 mg three times daily) or placebo. Symptoms were evaluated after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment. The selection of FD patients,collection of data, and evaluation of symptoms as well as adverse effects were performed by general practitioners. Dyspeptic patients were referred to the Gastroenterology Department in order to exclude ulcers, oesophagitis, pancreatitis and gallstones. Biopsies of gastric mucosa were taken for histological examination and H. pylori culture.

PATIENTS

121 patients entered this study (61 took cisapride, 60 placebo). There were 113 patients (56 cisapride, 57 placebo) available for analysis of the efficacy and 120 patients (61 cisapride, 59 placebo) for evaluation of adverse effects.In total 102 biopsies were tested for the presence of gastritis by histological examination. There were 30 H. pylori-positive cultures among 111 patients.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks a statistically significant reduction in symptoms was found, but it was similar in the two groups. No symptoms specific for H. pylori-positive patients were found. There was not a significant difference in the response to cisapride between H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative patients. The difference in overall (63%) response in the cisapride group and the 44% response in the placebo group did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found between placebo and cisapride in the treatment of FD in general practice. H. pylori-positive patients did not present with specific symptoms nor did they exhibit a different response to cisapride.

Single oral dose of cisapride accelerates gastric antral emptying in healthy humans: an ultrasonographic study

An ultrasonographic study of ten healthy volunteers was carried out to evaluate the effect of cisapride on gastric antral emptying. More than 1 week after the measurement of the baseline emptying rate, cisapride was given at a single oral dose of 5 mg 30 minutes before intake of a balanced liquid test meal (5 ml/kg body weight). To determine the time to half emptying (T1/2), an exponential curve was extrapolated for the elimination phase of the gastroantral sagittal cross-sectional area plotted against time. The T1/2 was reduced by 18.5% after cisapride, from 62.6 +/- 4.3 to 51.0 +/- 4.4 min (P = 0.0284). We conclude that a single oral dose of 5 mg of cisapride significantly accelerates the gastric antral emptying rate in healthy humans.

Recent advances in gastric emptying scintigraphy

Gastric emptying scintigraphy was introduced more than 25 years ago by Griffith and still remains the gold standard to assess gastric emptying. Test meals, radiopharmaceutical and acquisition procedures have been refined and optimized over the years and the test procedure is now well standardized. However, in its most common use, gastric emptying scintigraphy provides little information on gastric physiology and pathophysiology. Over the last decade, modeling of the liquid- and solid-emptying curves has provided some insight into the complex gastric physiology. Compartmental analysis of the stomach has also provided information on the pathophysiological mechanisms of delayed gastric emptying. Over the past 5 years, the most dramatic development in gastric emptying scintigraphy has been the introduction of digital antral scintigraphy. Digital antral scintigraphy consists primarily of dynamic imaging of the stomach and a refined Fourier transform processing method. This new procedure allows for the visualization of antral contractions and, like manometry, permits quantitative characterization of the frequency and amplitude of these contractions. Overall, this new procedure provides a unique, noninvasive tool to characterize gastric motility, to define the pathophysiological mechanisms of gastric motor disorders, and to evaluate the effect of new gastrokinetic compounds.

A risk-benefit assessment of cisapride in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders

Cisapride is a substituted benzamide compound that stimulates motor activity in all segments of the gastrointestinal tract by enhancing the release of acetylcholine from the enteric nervous system. Cisapride is administered orally in the treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, functional dyspepsia, gastroparesis, chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction syndromes and chronic constipation. In gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in both adults and children, cisapride provides symptomatic improvement and mucosal healing. Long term treatment with cisapride is effective in the prevention of relapse of oesophagitis. Cisapride improves gastric emptying rates and improves symptoms in patients with gastroparesis of various origins. Unlike domperidone and metoclopramide, long term administration of cisapride seems to result in persistently enhanced gastric emptying. Cisapride is also effective in improving symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia. In comparative studies in patients with functional dyspepsia, cisapride was at least as effective as metoclopramide, domperidone, clebopride, ranitidine and cimetidine. Cisapride increases stool frequency and reduces laxative consumption in patients with idiopathic constipation. Severe cases of slow transit constipation seem refractory to cisapride. Clinical studies also indicate that cisapride might be effective in the treatment of chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, postoperative ileus, peptic ulcer and irritable bowel syndrome. Further clinical studies are warranted to define the role of cisapride in these conditions. The dosage of cisapride ranges from 5mg 3 times daily to 20mg twice daily. Cisapride is generally well tolerated, both during short and long term treatment. In children, cisapride is also well tolerated in doses of 0.2 to 0.3 mg/kg, 3 to 4 times daily.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The effects of levosulpiride on gastric and gall-bladder emptying in functional dyspepsia

BACKGROUND

50% of patients with functional dyspepsia have delayed gastric emptying. Levosulpiride is an orthopramide drug that stimulates gastrointestinal motility. Aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of levosulpiride on symptoms and gastric and gall-bladder emptying, in dyspeptic patients.

METHODS

Thirty adult patients, treated for 20 days with levosulpiride (75 mg/day) or placebo, were evaluated in a randomized double-blind study. Symptoms were assessed by a cumulative index and overall intensity (visual analogue line). Gastric and gall-bladder emptying were evaluated by epigastric impedance (liquid meal) and real-time ultrasonography (mixed meal).

RESULTS

Levosulpiride, with respect to placebo, accelerated the mean gastric half-emptying time of liquids (P < 0.05), gastric emptying (P < 0.001 at 180 min; P < 0.05 at 240 min), and gall-bladder emptying (P < 0.05 at 60 and 120 min) emptying after a solid-liquid mixed meal. Both the mean cumulative index (P < 0.05) and the overall intensity (P < 0.025) of dyspeptic symptoms were reduced significantly by levosulpiride.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that levosulpiride can be usefully employed in patients affected by functional dyspepsia.

Open label study of long-term effectiveness of cisapride in patients with idiopathic gastroparesis

Cisapride induces acetylcholine release in cells of the myenteric plexus, thus promoting gastrointestinal motility. We studied the effects of cisapride on 11 patients with idiopathic gastroparesis. All had negative gastrointestinal endoscopy, normal glucose, and took no drugs capable of influencing motility. Most (9/11) were prior metoclopramide treatment failures. Patients' symptoms were scored (0-60) for pain, satiety, bloating, nausea, vomiting, and heartburn. All underwent a solid gastric emptying study using a Technetium-99-labeled egg meal and received placebo prior to cisapride. There were 10 females and one male with a mean (+/- SE) age of 37.8 +/- 2.6 years. Disease duration was 7.9 +/- 2.8 years. The dose of cisapride was 30-60 mg/day and the duration of therapy was 12.6 +/- 2.6 months (range 2.5-25 months). The symptom score improved on cisapride from 30.9 +/- 3.6 to 14.4 +/- 2.7 (P < 0.002 signed rank test). Emptying half-time improved from 113 +/- 4 min to 94 +/- 6 min, and 46.9 +/- 2.4% food remaining at 120 min decreased to 35.5 +/- 3.6% (both P < 0.05). Emptying half-time in normals was 68 +/- 5 min with 16.9 +/- 2.9% remaining at 120 min. Nine of 11 patients gained weight, with a mean increase of 6.7 +/- 1.6 lb (range 2-12 lb). We conclude that cisapride significantly reduces gastrointestinal symptoms and promotes weight gain in patients with idiopathic gastroparesis and is associated with improvement in solid gastric emptying. The drug is useful in patients who previously failed metoclopramide.

A new system for gastric emptying analysis using impedance measurement

A tetra-polar electrical impedance device has been constructed to permit study of gastric emptying using a microcomputer. An alternative current of 100 kHz, 4 mM peak-to-peak, is injected through a pair of surface electrodes on the upper abdomen. The voltage variations picked up across the second pair of electrodes correspond to the variations of epigastric impedance in response to the applied current. The low frequency voltage corresponding to gastric emptying and recording noise is then conditioned and digitised at a sampling frequency of 1 Hz. A parallel 8-bit signal is finally converted to standard serial form and sent, in real time, to a microcomputer via a serial port. In a process of off-line analysis, the emptying trace was extracted from measured traces by taking successive Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of length 64 points and was then fit by three mathematical models: linear, exponential and Weibull. The rate of emptying was calculated in terms of the time needed to achieve 50% emptying (T 1/2) from the best fit model. A clinical experiment was done in 20 healthy volunteers to investigate the reproducibility of the method and compared to a scintigraphic method. Successive measurements on the same subject gave statistically similar results and were statistically independent. No correlation has been observed between impedance and scintigraphic methods.

Acid, motility, and ulcers: a comparison of cisapride with placebo in the prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse

In a single centre double blind study of 66 patients, the value of cisapride (10 mg twice daily) was compared with placebo in the prevention of duodenal ulcer relapse. Patients who remained ulcer free attended for clinical review every two months and had a mandatory endoscopy at 0, 4, 8, and 12 months or if symptoms suggestive of ulcer recurrence developed. The 12 month crude relapse rates (that underestimate the probability of ulcer recurrence) showed that cisapride was superior to placebo (34% (11/32) relapsed on cisapride v 68% (23/34) on placebo, p = 0.007). This finding was confirmed using lifetable analysis, with a 35% reduction (95% confidence intervals 10-59%, p < 0.05) in the proportion of ulcer relapses in patients who had received cisapride compared with those treated with placebo. These results are similar to those reported in maintenance trials of H2 receptor antagonists analysed by the same method. Drug related adverse clinical events were mainly trivial, but led to three patients on cisapride and one on placebo withdrawing from the trial.

Cisapride in chronic dyspepsia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

The efficacy and tolerability of cisapride in chronic dyspepsia was evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. After 4 weeks' treatment with oral cisapride 10 mg three times daily (n = 14), bloating and epigastric discomfort were significantly reduced compared with placebo (n = 15; p < 0.05). Moreover, the global response to treatment was excellent or good in 71.4% of patients in the cisapride group versus 20.0% with placebo. No significant side effects were observed. It is concluded that cisapride is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for chronic dyspepsia.

The effect of different dosage schedules of cisapride on gastric emptying in idiopathic gastroparesis

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal dosage regimen of cisapride for the treatment of idiopathic gastroparesis. We studied 17 patients with documented idiopathic gastroparesis in a three-way, cross-over, double-blind study with three 4-day treatment periods separated by at least 3 days without treatment. In each period, the patients were preloaded with cisapride (10 mg tid) for three days. On the fourth day (the test day) they took either 10 mg or 20 mg before breakfast and placebo before lunch (1 x 10 mg), (1 x 20 mg), or 10 mg before breakfast and 10 mg before lunch (2 x 10 mg). The medications were taken 30 min before meals. Gastric emptying of solids (99mTc-sulphur colloid) was measured at lunch time under basal conditions and during each treatment period. Plasma concentrations of cisapride were determined before the breakfast dose, before the lunch dose, and at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 h after. The greatest acceleration in gastric emptying occurred with the 2 x 10 mg regimen. Although the single morning dose of 20 mg also significantly accelerated gastric emptying (P = 0.05), the reduction was not as substantial. Plasma concentrations of cisapride were significantly higher after 2 x 10 mg than after 1 x 20 mg or 1 x 10 mg. There was a significant relation between cisapride plasma concentrations and changes in gastric emptying. Peak concentrations of cisapride greater than 60 ng.ml-1 were invariably associated with acceleration of gastric emptying. We conclude that cisapride 10 mg tid before meals is the optimal dose for the treatment of idiopathic gastroparesis.

A double-blind fluoroscopic study of cisapride on gastrointestinal motility in patients with functional dyspepsia

Twenty patients with functional dyspepsia were referred for radiologic examination and, upon confirmation of a hypomotile stomach, were given either 10 mg cisapride or placebo in a double-blind manner (10 patients per group). The movement of a 250-ml barium meal was assessed by means of television fluoroscopy performed at regular time intervals. Cisapride significantly improved antral contractility and enhanced gastric emptying compared with placebo. Deep peristaltic waves occurred over the entire small bowel, and motility and small-bowel transit time of the barium meal were significantly increased in the cisapride group compared with the placebo group. The study demonstrates that when a carefully defined protocol is observed, fluoroscopy following barium ingestion offers considerable potential in the assessment of gastrointestinal motility.

Effect of treatment with cisapride alone or in combination with domperidone on gastric emptying and gastrointestinal symptoms in dyspeptic patients

The effects on gastric emptying and gastrointestinal symptoms of treatment with cisapride alone and in combination with domperidone were investigated in 25 patients with chronic idiopathic dyspepsia. In a double-blind study, 9 patients were randomly assigned to receive cisapride 2.5 mg three times daily, and 8 patients to receive placebo. After 7 days of treatment, gastric emptying was significantly accelerated and the score of gastrointestinal symptoms was significantly reduced in patients treated with cisapride. Placebo treatment had no significant effect. A randomized, double-blind crossover study of 8 patients compared the effects of combined treatment with cisapride 2.5 mg plus domperidone 10 mg three times daily for 7 days against the effects of cisapride plus placebo. Administration of cisapride plus domperidone gave significantly higher gastric emptying and lower gastrointestinal symptoms than cisapride plus placebo.

Simultaneous noninvasive evaluation of gastric emptying and orocaecal transit times. Use in studying the actions of cisapride in diabetic patients

The aim of the study was to use a novel combination of two methods for the simultaneous evaluation of two effects of oral cisapride in 10 diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy; gastric empyting time was measured by following radio-opaque markers and orocaecal transit time by the sulphasalazine-sulphapridine method. The study was of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over design. It was possible to evaluate the effect of a prokinetic drug on gastric emptying and orocaecal transit times using these two noninvasive techniques at the same time. Cisapride significantly reduced both the gastric empyting (1.2 h versus 2.1 h) and orocaecal tansit (5.9 h versus 7.7 h) times.

Gallbladder hypokinesia and normal gastric emptying of liquids in patients with dyspeptic symptoms. A double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial with cisapride

Gastric and gallbladder emptying after a standard liquid meal were studied in 65 patients with early satiety, bloating, pain at the right hypochondrium or the epigastrium, nausea, and occasionally vomiting. Fifty normal subjects were studied as a control group. Gastric and gallbladder emptying were evaluated by means of real-time ultrasonography (RUS). Serial RUS scans were made after a 12-hr fast and every 15 min after a standard meal for 2 hr. Patients were considered to have delayed gastric emptying or hypokinetic gallbladder when gastric diameters and gallbladder volume evaluated 45 min after meal were 2 SD above the corresponding mean values of the normal subject group. Fifteen patients (23%) were found with delayed gastric emptying and 20 (30.7%) a reduced gallbladder emptying. None of our patients showed delayed gastric emptying and hypokinetic gallbladder simultaneously. The 20 patients with reduced gallbladder emptying were included in a double-blind randomized, placebo controlled, change-over study with cisapride (10 mg three times a day) for 30 days. Cisapride treatment reversed the gallbladder hypomotility within the normal range while placebo did not change the response to meal. Symptom score improved significantly after cisapride and placebo. It is concluded that in dyspeptic patients with reduced gallbladder response to a meal cisapride may be of help in improving the kinetic abnormality. Dyspeptic symptoms, however, do not seem to be corrected with the described gallbladder motor abnormality.

Effect of cisapride on delayed gastric emptying in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Some patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease have delayed gastric emptying. This study investigates the effect of cisapride on gastric emptying in 34 patients with proved reflux and delayed gastric emptying of solids. They were enrolled in a double blind controlled crossover study. Placebo or cisapride (10 mg) tablets were given three times a day for three days followed by further assessment of gastric emptying. The protocol was repeated with the crossover tablet. Gastric emptying was assessed by a dual radionuclide technique. The percentage of a solid meal remaining in the stomach at 100 minutes (% R100 minutes) and the time taken for 50% of the liquid to empty (T50 minutes) were calculated and analysed by the Wilcoxon matched pairs signed ranks test and expressed as medians (ranges). For gastric emptying of solids the initial % R100 minutes (70 (60-100)%) was not significantly different from placebo (71 (35-100)%). After cisapride treatment a significant acceleration (p less than 0.001) in gastric emptying occurred (% R100 minutes, 50.5 (28-93)%). Similarly with gastric emptying of liquids, the initial T50 minute value was 26.5 (12-82) minutes, after placebo the value was 28 (11-81) minutes, but this was significantly accelerated with cisapride (p less than 0.03) to 22.5 (6-61) minutes. The acceleration in gastric emptying occurred in the proximal portion of the stomach for gastric emptying of both solids and liquids suggesting that this is the principal site of action of cisapride. We conclude that cisapride significantly accelerates gastric emptying of both solids and liquids in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and delayed gastric emptying.

Long-term efficacy of oral cisapride in symptomatic upper gut dysmotility

We conducted a 12-month trial of cisapride (10 mg three times a day) in 21 patients with gastric stasis due to clinically and manometrically diagnosed gastroparesis (N = 9; seven due to diabetes) or chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (N = 12). Radionuclide solid-liquid gastric emptying tests were performed at baseline and at the end of the 12-month period. Symptoms were assessed monthly by diary and every three months by the investigators; frequency and severity of symptoms were scored in a standardized manner. For the whole group of 21 patients, gastric emptying of both solids and liquids improved significantly after one year of cisapride (P less than 0.05). Among chronic intestinal pseudoobstruction patients, there was predominantly an improvement in gastric emptying of solids; in contrast, patients with gastroparesis had a greater improvement in liquid emptying. Total symptom score improved significantly in the gastroparesis group (median score: 8 at baseline vs 6 at one year, P less than 0.05) but not in the chronic intestinal pseudoobstruction patients (median score at baseline 10 vs 9 at one year). Similarly, body weight showed a trend towards improvement in the gastroparesis group. No significant side effects were noted. We conclude that during a 12-month open trial, cisapride was effective in improving gastric emptying in patients with gastric stasis and consistently improved symptoms in those with gastroparesis.

Evidence for hypomotility in non-ulcer dyspepsia: a prospective multifactorial study

A prospective multifactorial study of symptoms and disturbance of gastrointestinal function has been undertaken in 50 patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia. Objective tests including solid meal gastric emptying studies, gastric acid secretion, E-HIDA scintiscan for enterogastric bile reflux, and hydrogen breath studies were carried out in all patients and validated against control data. Gastroscopy and biopsy were carried out in non-ulcer dyspepsia patients only. Non-ulcer dyspepsia patients were categorised on the basis of predominant symptoms as: dysmotility-like dyspepsia (n = 22); essential dyspepsia (n = 14), gastro-oesophageal reflux-like dyspepsia (n = 11); and ulcer-like dyspepsia (n = 3). In the total non-ulcer dyspepsia population, solid meal gastric emptying was delayed (T50 mean (SEM) = 102 (6) minutes (patients) v 64 (6) minutes (controls), (p less than 0.01) and high incidences of gastritis (n = 26) and Helicobacter pyloridis infection (n = 18) were found. An inverse correlation was observed between solid meal gastric emptying and fasting peak acid output (r = -0.4; p less than 0.01). Indeed gastric emptying was particularly prolonged in eight patients (T50 mean (SEM) = 139 (15) minutes) with hypochlorhydria. In the non-ulcer dyspepsia population oral to caecal transit time of a solid meal was delayed (mean SEM = 302 (14) minutes (patients) v 244 (12) minutes (controls) (p less than 0.01]. Seven patients had a dual peak of breath hydrogen suggestive of small bowel bacterial overgrowth. No association was observed between symptoms and any of the objective abnormalities. This multifactorial study has shown that hypomotility, including gastroparesis and delayed small bowel transit, is common in non-ulcer dyspepsia and may be related to other disorders of gastrointestinal function. No relation between symptoms and disorders of function, however, has been shown.