Complications of carotid endarterectomy and their prevention

Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)

BACKGROUND

Temporary interruption of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy can be avoided by using a shunt across the clamped section of the carotid artery. The shunt may improve the outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane review originally published in 1996 and previously updated in 2002, 2009, and 2014.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of routine versus selective or no shunting, and to assess the best method for selective shunting on death, stroke, and other complications in people undergoing carotid endarterectomy under general anaesthesia.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched April 2021), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2021, Issue 4), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2021), Embase (1980 to April 2021), and the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) (1980 to April 2021). We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and handsearched relevant journals, conference proceedings, and reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of routine shunting compared with no shunting or selective shunting, and trials that compared different shunting policies in people undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three independent review authors performed data extraction, selection, and analysis. A pooled Peto odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed for all outcomes of interest. Best and worse case scenarios were also calculated in case of unavailable data. Two authors independently assessed risk of bias, and quality of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

No new trials were found for this updated review. Thus, six trials involving 1270 participants are included in this latest review: three trials involving 686 participants compared routine shunting with no shunting, one trial involving 200 participants compared routine shunting with selective shunting, one trial involving 253 participants compared selective shunting with and without near-infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring, and the other trial involving 131 participants compared shunting with a combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure measurement with shunting by carotid pressure measurement alone. Only three trials comparing routine shunting and no shunting were eligible for meta-analysis. Major findings of this comparison found that the routine shunting had less risk of stroke-related death within 30 days of surgery (best case) than no shunting (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.96, I² not applicable, P = 0.05, low-quality evidence), the routine shunting group had a lower stroke rate within 24 hours of surgery (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.15, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.78, I² = not applicable, P = 0.02, low-quality evidence), and ipsilateral stroke within 30 days of surgery (best case) (Peto OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.97, I² = 52%, P = 0.04, low-quality evidence) than the no shunting group. No difference was found between the groups in terms of postoperative neurological deficit between selective shunting with and without near-infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring. However, this analysis was inadequately powered to reliably detect the effect. There was no difference between the risk of ipsilateral stroke in participants selected for shunting with the combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure assessment compared with pressure assessment alone, although again the data were limited.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review concluded that the data available were too limited to either support or refute the use of routine or selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy when performed under general anaesthesia. Large-scale randomised trials of routine shunting versus selective shunting are required. No method of monitoring in selective shunting has been shown to produce better outcomes.

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy may significantly reduce the risk of stroke in people with recently symptomatic, severe carotid artery stenosis. However, there are significant perioperative risks that may be minimised by performing the operation under local rather than general anaesthetics. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 1996, and previously updated in 2004, 2008, and 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthetic: 1) reduces the risk of perioperative stroke and death compared with general anaesthetic; 2) reduces the complication rate (other than stroke) following carotid endarterectomy; and 3) is acceptable to individuals and surgeons.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers (to February 2021). We also reviewed reference lists of articles identified.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the use of local anaesthetics to general anaesthetics for people having carotid endarterectomy were eligible.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and evaluated quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) tool. We calculated a pooled Peto odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for the following outcomes that occurred within 30 days of surgery: stroke, death, ipsilateral stroke, stroke or death, myocardial infarction, local haemorrhage, and arteries shunted.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 RCTs involving 4839 participants, of which 3526 were obtained from the single largest trial (GALA). The main findings from our meta-analysis showed that, within 30 days of operation, neither incidence of stroke nor death were significantly different between local and general anaesthesia. Of these, the incidence of stroke in the local and general anaesthesia groups was 3.2% and 3.5%, respectively (Peto odds ratio (OR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 1.26; P = 0.58; 13 studies, 4663 participants; low-quality evidence). The rate of ipsilateral stroke under both types of anaesthesia was 3.1% (Peto OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.48; P = 0.89; 2 studies, 3733 participants; low-quality evidence). The incidence of stroke or death in the local anaesthesia group was 3.5%, while stroke or death incidence was 4.1% in the general anaesthesia group (Peto OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.16; P = 0.31; 11 studies, 4391 participants; low-quality evidence). A lower rate of death was observed in the local anaesthetic group but evidence was of low quality (Peto OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.06; P = 0.08; 12 studies, 4421 participants).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of stroke and death were not convincingly different between local and general anaesthesia for people undergoing carotid endarterectomy. The current evidence supports the choice of either approach. Further high-quality studies are still needed as the evidence is of limited reliability.

Modified Suturing Techniques in Carotid Endarterectomy for Reducing the Cerebral Ischemic Time

Objective

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an effective surgical procedure for treating symptomatic or asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis. Many neurosurgeons use a shunt to reduce perioperative ischemic complications. However, the use of shunting is still controversial, and the shunt procedure can cause several complications. In our institution, we used two types of modified arteriotomy suture techniques instead of using a shunt.

Methods

In technique 1, to prevent ischemic complications, we sutured a third of the arteriotomy site from both ends after removing the plaque. Afterward, the unsutured middle third was isolated from the arterial lumen by placing a curved Satinsky clamp. And then, we opened all the clamped carotid arteries before finishing the suture. In technique 2, we sutured the arteriotomy site at the common carotid artery (CCA). We then placed a curved Satinsky clamp crossing from the sutured site to the carotid bifurcation, isolating the unsutured site at the internal carotid artery (ICA). After placing the Satinsky clamp, the CCA and external carotid artery (ECA) were opened to allow blood flow from CCA to ECA. By opening the ECA, ECA collateral flow via ECA-ICA anastomoses could help to reduce cerebral ischemia.

Results

The modified suture methods can reduce the cerebral ischemia directly (technique 1) or via using collaterals (technique 2). The modified arteriotomy suture techniques are simple, safe, and applicable to almost all cases of CEA.

Conclusion

Two modified arteriotomy suture techniques could reduce perioperative ischemic complications by reducing the cerebral ischemic time.

Treatment of an Infected, Bovine Pericardial Carotid Patch: Excision and Reconstruction with a Superficial Femoral Arterial Interposition Graft

Carotid patch infection is a rare complication but one often associated with severe morbidity, including hemorrhage, stroke, cranial nerve injury, and mortality. We present a case of a gram-negative bacterial infection of a bovine pericardial carotid patch. Treatment ultimately required patch explantation and reconstruction with a femoral arterial interposition graft.

Carotid Endarterectomy in a Metropolitan Community: Complications in 518 Consecutive Cases

The records of 518 consecutive carotid endarterectomies done in 427 patients in one institution were evaluated for perioperative complications and catego rized according to their presenting syndrome. Of this surgery, 62.9% was done for hemispheric transient ischemic attack (TIA), 14.5% for nonhemispheric TIAs, 7.9% in patients with previous stroke, and 14.7% for asymptomatic sig nificant carotid stenosis. Each group's complication rate was then evaluated and compared with rates in comparable studies. The postoperative stroke rate and the combined stroke and death rate were 2.6% and 2.6%, respectively, for the group with asymptomatic significant carotid stenosis; 2.7% and 4%, respec tively, for the group with nonhemispheric TIA; 4% and 4.6%, respectively, for the group with hemispheric TIA; and 7.3% and 7.3%, respectively, in the group with previous stroke. The combined postoperative stroke rate for the whole series was 3.9% and the death rate was 1.4% with a combined stroke and death rate of 4.4%.

This study points out the need to categorize patients who have had carotid endarterectomy by their presenting syndrome before comparing them with pa tients in other studies.

Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)

BACKGROUND

Temporary interruption of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy can be avoided by using a shunt across the clamped section of the carotid artery. This may improve outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane review originally published in 1996 and previously updated in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of routine versus selective or no shunting during carotid endarterectomy, and to assess the best method for selecting people for shunting.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched August 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, 2013, Issue 8), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2013), EMBASE (1980 to August 2013) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to August 2013). We handsearched journals and conference proceedings, checked reference lists, and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of routine shunting compared with no shunting or selective shunting, and trials that compared different shunting policies in people undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently performed the searches and applied the inclusion criteria. For this update, we identified two new relevant randomised controlled trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We included six trials involving 1270 participants in the review: three trials involving 686 participants compared routine shunting with no shunting, one trial involving 200 participants compared routine shunting with selective shunting, one trial involving 253 participants compared selective shunting with and without near-infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring, and the other trial involving 131 participants compared shunting with a combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure measurement with shunting by carotid pressure measurement alone. In general, reporting of methodology in the included studies was poor. For most studies, the blinding of outcome assessors and the report of prespecified outcomes were unclear. For routine versus no shunting, there was no significant difference in the rate of all stroke, ipsilateral stroke or death up to 30 days after surgery, although data were limited. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of postoperative neurological deficit between selective shunting with and without near-infrared refractory spectroscopy monitoring, However, this analysis was inadequately powered to reliably detect the effect. There was no significant difference between the risk of ipsilateral stroke in participants selected for shunting with the combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure assessment compared with pressure assessment alone, although again the data were limited.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review concluded that the data available were too limited to either support or refute the use of routine or selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy. Large scale randomised trials of routine shunting versus selective shunting are required. No method of monitoring in selective shunting has been shown to produce better outcomes.

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy may significantly reduce the risk of stroke in people with recently symptomatic, severe carotid artery stenosis. However, there are significant perioperative risks that may be reduced by performing the operation under local rather than general anaesthetic. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 1996, and previously updated in 2004 and 2008.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether carotid endarterectomy under local anaesthetic: (1) reduces the risk of perioperative stroke and death compared with general anaesthetic; (2) reduces the complication rate (other than stroke) following carotid endarterectomy; and (3) is acceptable to patients and surgeons.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (September 2013), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2013), EMBASE (1980 to September 2013) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (ISTP) (1980 to September 2013). We also handsearched relevant journals, and searched the reference lists of articles identified.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing the use of local anaesthetic to general anaesthetic for carotid endarterectomy were considered for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We calculated a pooled Peto odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) for the following outcomes that occurred within 30 days of surgery: stroke, death, stroke or death, myocardial infarction, local haemorrhage, cranial nerve injuries, and shunted arteries.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 randomised trials involving 4596 operations, of which 3526 were from the single largest trial (GALA). In general, reporting of methodology in the included studies was poor. All studies were unable to blind patients and surgical teams to randomised treatment allocation and for most studies the blinding of outcome assessors was unclear. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of stroke within 30 days of surgery between the local anaesthesia group and the general anaesthesia group. The incidence of strokes in the local anaesthesia group was 3.2% compared to 3.5% in the general anaesthesia group (Peto OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.28). There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients who had a stroke or died within 30 days of surgery. In the local anaesthesia group 3.6% of patients had a stroke or died compared to 4.2% of patients in the general anaesthesia group (Peto OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.16). There was a non-significant trend towards lower operative mortality with local anaesthetic. In the local anaesthesia group 0.9% of patients died within 30 days of surgery compared to 1.5% of patients in the general anaesthesia group (Peto OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.07). However, neither the GALA trial or the pooled analysis were adequately powered to reliably detect an effect on mortality.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of patients who had a stroke or died within 30 days of surgery did not differ significantly between the two types of anaesthetic techniques used during carotid endarterectomy. This systematic review provides evidence to suggest that patients and surgeons can choose either anaesthetic technique, depending on the clinical situation and their own preferences.

Shunting during carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

The use of shunting during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is controversial. While some surgeons advocate routine shunting, others prefer selective shunting or no shunting. Several large series have documented excellent results of CEA with routine shunting or without shunts. Others reported similar results with selective shunting using transcranial Doppler (TCD), electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring, carotid stump pressure (SP), cervical block anesthesia (CBA), and somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP). In this study, we review the available evidence supporting shunting, nonshunting, and selective shunting during CEA.

METHODS

An electronic PubMed/MEDLINE search was conducted to identify all published CEA studies between January 1990 and December 2010, that analyzed the perioperative outcome of routine shunting, routine nonshunting, routine versus selective shunting, selecting shunting versus avoiding a shunt, and selective shunting based on EEG, TCD, SP, CBA, and SSEP.

RESULTS

The mean reported perioperative stroke rate for CEAs with routine shunting was 1.4% and for routine nonshunt was 2%. Meanwhile, the mean perioperative stroke rates for selecting shunting were 1.6% using EEG, 4.8% using TCD, 1.6% using SP, 1.8% using SSEP, and 1.1% for CBA. Similar results were noted for perioperative stroke and death rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of routine shunting and selective shunting was associated with a low stroke rate. Both methods are acceptable, and the individual surgeon should select the method with which they are more comfortable.

Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)

BACKGROUND

Temporary interruption of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy can be avoided by using a shunt across the clamped section of the carotid artery. This may improve outcome. This is an update of a Cochrane Review originally published in 1996 and previously updated in 2001.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of routine versus selective, or never, shunting during carotid endarterectomy, and to assess the best method for selecting patients for shunting.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched September 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2009), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2008), EMBASE (1980 to November 2008) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to November 2008). We handsearched journals and conference proceedings, checked reference lists, and contacted experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of routine shunting compared with no shunting or selective shunting, and trials that compared different shunting policies in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed the searches and applied the inclusion criteria. We identified one new relevant randomised controlled trial.

MAIN RESULTS

We included four trials in the review: three trials involving 686 patients compared routine shunting with no shunting; the other trial involving 131 patients compared shunting with a combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure measurement with shunting by carotid pressure measurement alone. Allocation was adequately concealed in one trial, and one trial was quasi-randomised. Analysis was by intention-to-treat where possible. For routine versus no shunting, there was no significant difference in the rate of all stroke, ipsilateral stroke or death up to 30 days after surgery, although data were limited. There was no significant difference between the risk of ipsilateral stroke in patients selected for shunting with the combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure assessment compared to pressure assessment alone, although again the data were limited.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review concluded that the data available were too limited to either support or refute the use of routine or selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy. It was suggested that large scale randomised trials between routine shunting versus selective shunting were required. No one method of monitoring in selective shunting has been shown to produce better outcomes.

Patches for carotid artery endarterectomy: current materials and prospects

Patch angioplasty is commonly performed after carotid endarterectomy. Randomized prospective trials and meta-analyses have documented improved rates of perioperative and long-term stroke prevention as well as reduced rates of restenosis for patches compared with primary closure of the arteriotomy. Although use of vein patches is considered to be the gold standard for patch closure, newer generations of synthetic and biologic materials rival outcomes associated with vein patches. Future bioengineered patches are likely to optimize patch performance, both by achieving minimal stroke risk and long-term rates of restenosis as well as by minimizing the risk of unusual complications of prosthetic patches such as infection and pseudoaneurysm formation. In addition, lessons from bioengineered patches will likely enable construction of bioengineered and tissue-engineered bypass grafts.

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke in people with recently symptomatic, severe carotid artery stenosis. However, there are significant perioperative risks which may be lessened by performing the operation under local rather than general anaesthetic. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 1996, and previously updated in 2004.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the risks of endarterectomy under local compared with general anaesthetic.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched December 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2007) EMBASE (1980 to April 2007) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (ISTP, 1980 to April 2007). We also handsearched six relevant journals to April 2007, and searched the reference lists of articles identified. For the previous version of this review we handsearched a further seven journals to 2002 and in August 2001 advertised the review in Vascular News, a newspaper for European vascular specialists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials and non-randomised studies comparing carotid endarterectomy under local versus general anaesthetic.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trial quality and extracted the data independently.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine randomised trials involving 812 operations, and 47 non-randomised studies involving 24,181 operations were included. Meta-analysis of the randomised studies showed that there was no evidence of a reduction in the odds of operative stroke, but the use of local anaesthetic was associated with a significant reduction in local haemorrhage (odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.77) within 30 days of the operation. However, the randomised trials were too small to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn, and in some studies intention-to-treat analyses were not possible because of exclusions. Meta-analsis of the non-randomised studies showed that the use of local anaesthetic was associated with significant reductions in the odds of stroke (38 studies), death (42 studies), stroke or death (27 studies), myocardial infarction (27 studies), and pulmonary complications (seven studies), within 30 days of the operation. The methodological quality of the non-randomised trials was questionable. Thirteen of the non-randomised studies were prospective and 36 reported on a consecutive series of patients. In eleven non-randomised studies the number of arteries, as opposed to the number of patients, was unclear.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials comparing carotid endarterectomy performed under local and general anaesthetic. Non-randomised studies suggest potential benefits with the use of local anaesthetic, but these studies may be biased.

Œdème cérébral vasogénique par syndrome de reperfusion post-endartérectomie carotidienne

INTRODUCTION

Reperfusion (or hyperperfusion) syndrome may be a possible complication of carotid artery endarterectomy or angioplasty.

OBSERVATION

We report the case of a 54-year-old man who underwent a right carotid endarterectomy for an asymptomatic carotid stenosis and developed reperfusion syndrome a few days after surgery. The symptoms were marked by a prolonged partial epileptic status and then left hemiplegia lasting several days. Brain MRI with Diffusion sequences was normal, whereas there was a right frontoparietal hypersignal in FLAIR sequences, suggesting the presence of brain vasogenic oedema. Clinical and neuroradiological outcomes were good, confirming the relative good prognosis attributed to vasogenic brain oedema in previous similar publications. This condition may be misdiagnosed as cytotoxic brain oedema, another possible complication of carotid endarterectomy, whose management and prognosis are different.

CONCLUSION

When a focal neurological deficit or epileptic seizures follow carotid artery endarterectomy, it is important to consider reperfusion syndrome. MRI (with FLAIR and Diffusion sequences) will show a vasogenic brain oedema, with a better prognosis than what can be expected with cytotoxic oedema.

Carotid endarterectomy, carotid artery shunting and outcome: an historical perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Carotid endarterectomy is now celebrating its 50th anniversary! Yet, despite millions of these operations having been performed, there is little agreement about the best methods of surgical technique, cerebral protection, anesthetic technique and monitoring methods. In this time of evidence-based medicine, carotid endarterectomy fares badly, with only the indications for the surgery having been subjected to the appropriate methodology of clinical trials and biostatistics for proper evaluation. This review is designed to look back over the history of carotid endarterectomy in order to understand the evolution of current practices.

RECENT FINDINGS

Within the past 5 years, despite the publication of many papers dealing with issues surrounding carotid shunting, no randomized controlled trials evaluating this aspect of carotid artery surgery have appeared. One must probe further into the past to understand how so much can be written yet so little learned!

SUMMARY

Current evidence is not able to support the hypothesis that shunting during carotid artery surgery reduces the risk of perioperative stroke or death or that its use is associated with an increase in perioperative or long-term complications. Routine, selective or no shunting protocols during carotid artery surgery remain a matter of local custom and tradition.

Selective shunting during carotid endarterectomy

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an effective treatment for significant carotid atherosclerosis. Perioperative stroke, a devastating complication, may be partially circumvented by shunting. However, routine shunt use is not without complications and does not benefit every patient. Our study is designed to determine whether CEA under general anesthesia, without cerebral monitoring, can be safely done with shunting only in the presence of poor internal carotid artery back-bleeding or contralateral carotid occlusion or critical stenosis. The medical records of 995 carotid operations were reviewed. A subset of 117 operations was performed on 112 patients using selective shunting. Data were analyzed and outcomes compared. For the selective shunt group, indications for redo operations (n=13) were recurrent asymptomatic high-grade stenosis in 69% and amaurosis fugax or transient ischemic attack in 31%. Indications for primary CEA (n=104) were asymptomatic high-grade stenosis in 59%, amaurosis fugax or transient ischemic attack in 36%, previous stroke in 3%, and global ischemia in 2%. A selective shunt was used in 29% of all symptomatic and 11% of all asymptomatic patients. No cerebral monitoring was used. There were no perioperative deaths and no permanent cranial nerve injuries, and there was one stroke (0.8%) from postoperative carotid thrombosis in a shunted patient. The average length of stay was 1.6 days for the non-shunt group and 2.2 days for the shunt group. The routine shunt group (n=878) had an overall stroke rate of 0.7%, no permanent cranial nerve deficits, and a mean hospital stay of 2.6 days. CEA under general anesthesia with selective shunting can be performed safely without cerebral monitoring.

Preoperative assessment and management to prevent complications during high-risk vascular surgery

OBJECTIVE

Most patients requiring vascular surgical reconstruction are at high risk for major morbidity and mortality, with certain vascular procedures at particularly high risk for complications. Although numerous comorbid conditions are precisely the risk factors that determine outcome, we review particular factors for each surgery that may be optimized to alter outcome and minimize postoperative complications.

DESIGN

Literature review.

RESULTS

Certain aspects of care are common to all vascular surgery procedures, including thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair, pararenal and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, mesenteric and renal revascularization, and carotid endarterectomy. Some factors that are important include careful preoperative assessment and optimization of cardiac, pulmonary, and renal function and volume status. In addition, the use of experienced teams during and after the procedure, as well as clear and continuous communication between all surgical team members, may improve outcome. Particular attention to procedural details is also crucial to achieving excellent results.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients needing vascular surgery often possess management challenges that increase the risk of perioperative complications. Meticulous attention to details during all phases of care, including preoperative optimization as well as intraoperative procedural conduct and communication, helps achieve optimal results and thus minimize the risk of complications.

Local versus general anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy reduces the risk of stroke in people with recently symptomatic, severe carotid artery stenosis. However, there are significant perioperative risks which may be lessened by performing the operation under local rather than general anaesthetic.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the risks of endarterectomy under local compared with general anaesthetic.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Stroke Group trials register (April 2003), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2002), and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to 1994). We handsearched 13 relevant journals up to 2002, and searched the reference lists of articles identified. We also advertised the review in Vascular News (a newspaper for European vascular specialists) in August 2001.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials and non-randomised studies comparing carotid endarterectomy under local versus general anaesthetic.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One reviewer selected studies for inclusion and another independently checked the decisions. Two reviewers assessed trial quality and independently extracted the data.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven randomised trials involving 554 operations, and 41 non-randomised studies involving 25622 operations were included. The methodological quality of the non-randomised trials was questionable. Eleven of the non-randomised studies were prospective and 29 reported on a consecutive series of patients. In nine non-randomised studies the number of arteries, as opposed to the number of patients, was unclear. Meta-analysis of the non-randomised studies showed that the use of local anaesthetic was associated with significant reductions in the odds of death (35 studies), stroke (31 studies), stroke or death (26 studies), myocardial infarction (22 studies), and pulmonary complications (7 studies), within 30 days of the operation. Meta-analysis of the randomised studies showed that the use of local anaesthetic was associated with a significant reduction in local haemorrhage (OR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.12 to 0.79) within 30 days of the operation, but there was no evidence of a reduction in the odds of operative stroke. However, the trials were too small to allow reliable conclusions to be drawn, and in some studies intention-to-treat analyses were not possible because of exclusions.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials comparing carotid endarterectomy performed under local and general anaesthetic. Non-randomised studies suggest potential benefits with the use of local anaesthetic, but these studies may be biased. More randomised studies are needed.

Integrated care pathway for carotid endarterectomy patients

Modern day health care should incorporate strategies for controlling both the cost and quality of clinical interventions, to ensure that care is evidence based, outcomes are monitored and any areas of poor practice are improved. An integrated care pathway for an area of vascular surgery was devised with these issues in mind. The chosen pathway was for patients undergoing surgery to remove atheromatous plaques from the carotid artery. The evidence base for the interventions detailed in the pathway are given and potential advantages and disadvantages of utilizing care pathways offered. Utilizing this form of structured care, health professionals may be able to ensure cost containment combined with high quality patient care.

Routine or selective carotid artery shunting for carotid endarterectomy (and different methods of monitoring in selective shunting)

BACKGROUND

Temporary interruption of cerebral blood flow during carotid endarterectomy can be avoided by using a shunt across the clamped section of the carotid artery. This may improve outcome.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effect of routine versus selective, or never, shunting during carotid endarterectomy, and to assess the best method for selecting patients for shunting.

SEARCH STRATEGY

For the original review the authors searched the Cochrane Stroke Group trials register, Medline (1966 to 1994), Embase (1980 to 1995) and Index to Scientific and Technical Proceedings (1980 to 1994). They also hand searched Annals of Surgery (1981 to 1995), British Journal of Surgery (1985 to 1995), European Journal of Vascular Surgery (1988 to 1995) and World Journal of Surgery (1978 to 1995). For the updated review, for the dates January 1994 - December 2000 we: 1. Repeated all these searches performed for the original review and developed more comprehensive search strategies for Medline and Embase. The Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register was last searched in May 2001. 2. Hand searched the Journal of Vascular Surgery, Stroke, Annals of Vascular Surgery, American Journal of Surgery and Cardiovascular Surgery. 3. Hand searched the abstracts from the International Stroke Conference, AGM of the Vascular Surgical Society (UK), AGM of the Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland and the Annual Meeting of the Society for Vascular Surgery (USA). 4. Searched reference lists from all relevant trials All the authors of studies included in the initial review, and other authors known to have published relevant work, were contacted requesting information about further published or unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials of routine shunting compared with no shunting or selective shunting, and trials that compared different shunting policies in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For the original review two reviewers independently performed the searches and applied the inclusion criteria. The data were extracted by one reviewer and double-checked. Trial quality was assessed. During the update, two reviewers independently performed the searches and applied the inclusion criteria. No new relevant randomised controlled trials were found.

MAIN RESULTS

Despite recommendation from the original review that further studies were required, no new trials of adequate quality and fitting the inclusion criteria were found. The initial review included three trials. Two trials involving 590 patients compared routine shunting with no shunting. The other trial involving 131 patients compared shunting with a combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure measurement, with shunting by carotid pressure measurement alone. Allocation was adequately concealed in one trial, and one trial was quasi-randomised. Analysis was by intention-to-treat where possible. For routine versus no shunting, there was no significant difference in the rate of all stroke, ipsilateral stroke or death up to 30 days after surgery, although data were limited. There was no significant difference between the risk of ipsilateral stroke in patients selected for shunting with the combination of electroencephalographic and carotid pressure assessment compared to pressure assessment alone, although again the data were limited.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

When first published in 1995, this review concluded that the data available were too limited to either support or refute the use of routine or selective shunting in carotid endarterectomy. It was suggested that large scale randomised trials using no shunting as the control group were required. No one method of monitoring in selective shunting has been shown to produce better outcomes. No further prospective randomised or quasi-randomised trials have been performed since then and the conclusions therefore remain unchanged.

Long-term geometric stability of saphenous vein patched carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine whether there is a generalized trend of progressive enlargement of the common and internal carotid bulbs after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) reconstruction with saphenous vein patches.

METHODS

Twenty-nine autologous greater saphenous vein-patched CEAs performed between 1983 and 1994 were examined with five to nine sequential duplex scans each that included B-mode measurements of both the common carotid bulb (CCB) and internal carotid bulb (ICB) diameters. A total of 186 scans of each of the two segments were performed from 2 to 182 months after CEA (mean, 64 months). The time from the first to the last scan ranged from 30 to 120 months (mean, 76 months). Repeated measures analysis of variance was used as a means of testing the relationship of CCB and ICB diameters with time from CEA and with time from the first scan. Simple linear regression was used as a means of analyzing the variability of individual CCB and ICB diameters and pooled normalized diameters in both time frames.

RESULTS

The CCB diameters ranged from 8.4 to 18.5 mm (mean, 13.1 mm), and the ICB diameters ranged from 6.4 to 16.0 mm (mean, 11.2 mm). No significant relationship between both CCB and ICB diameters in the time from CEA or the time from the first scan (P =.643 to.913), for sex (P =.403 to.917), or for early and late post-CEA time of study onset (P =.135 to.773) was shown by means of repeated measures analysis. Low R(2) values (CCB mean, 0.17; ICB mean, 0.21) and non-significant P values for regression slope (CCB mean, 0.46; ICB mean, 0.54) were given by means of individual regression analysis. There was no correlation between individual regression coefficients and the mean diameters of the arteries. The mean change in CCB diameter was 0.023 mm/year (range, -0.37 to 0.30 mm/year), and the mean change in ICB diameter was -0.030 mm/year (range, -0.33 to 0.37 mm/year). Regression of normalized CCB and ICB diameters versus time gave R(2) values less than 0.02 and slopes not statistically significantly different from zero. The predicted 10-year average percent change in normalized diameters ranged from 0.8% to 3.3%.

CONCLUSION

In a 15-year period after CEA and a 10-year sequential B-mode scan study period, there was no evidence of significant enlargement of saphenous vein-patched CEAs. This is also true for CEAs in men and women and for subsets with larger and smaller CCB and ICB diameters and early and late scan onset times. Dilatation after saphenous vein patching is most likely a rare isolated event and not the result of generalized or frequent progressive enlargement.

Prosthetic patch infection after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN

prospective audit of the management and outcome of prosthetic patch infection after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) at Leicester Royal Infirmary plus review of the literature.

RESULTS

8/936 CEA patients (0.85%) developed a prosthetic patch infection. Responsible organisms included MRSA (n=3), Staphylococcus epidermidis(n=2), haemolytic Streptococcus (n=1), Staphylococcus aureus(n=1) and Pseudomonas (n=1). Early wound complications preceded 4/5 infections presenting within 9 weeks of surgery. In addition to systemic antibiotics and debridement, management included patch removal and: (i) carotid ligation (n=3), vein patch repair (n=1), vein bypass (n=3). One patient had antibiotic irrigation of the in-situpatch. No patient died, one suffered a disabling postoperative stroke and two had temporary cranial nerve injuries. Including this series, a literature review identified 43 prosthetic patch infections, 91% culturing Staphylococci or Streptococci. Cumulative freedom from perioperative stroke/death or re-infection was 65% at 2 years. Patients treated by patch excision and autologous venous reconstruction had the best outcome with a cumulative freedom from perioperative stroke/death or re-infection of 91% at 2 years.

CONCLUSION

prosthetic patch infection after CEA is rare. This study emphasises the importance of close surveillance of early wound complications. Surgical decision-making, especially the safety of carotid ligation, was facilitated by access to transcranial Doppler.

Reconstructive surgery of the extracranial arteries

The first carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is usually accredited to Eastcott who reported in 1954 the successful incision of a diseased carotid bulb with end-to-end anastomosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) to the common carotid artery (CCA). During the following years surgeons were quick to adopt and improve the intuitively attractive procedure. But by the early to mid 1980s several leading neurologists began to question the growing number of CEAs performed at that time. Six major CEA trials were then designed which are now completed or nearing completion. Most conclusive data are available from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) for symptomatic carotid disease, and from the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) for asymptomatic carotid disease. The key result of these studies is that CEA is beneficial to high grade symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. While the benefit in symptomatic disease is clear, it may be negligible in asymptomatic patients suffering from other medical conditions, the most important being coronary artery disease. Since the conclusions from the different studies vary significantly, guidelines and recommendations with regard to CEA have been issued by a number of interest groups, so-called consensus conferences. The best known guidelines are published by the American Heart Association (AHA). However, the practice of interest groups to issue guidelines is currently being criticized, the main reason being that interest groups have different ideas and all claim the right to issue guidelines. At present we recommend CEA for symptomatic high-grade stenosis in patients without significant coincident disease. With regard to asymptomatic stenosis we suggest surgery to otherwise healthy patients if the stenosis is very narrow or progressive. Preoperative evaluation has changed over the years. Currently we recommend duplex sonography in combination with intra- and extracranial magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). Concurrent coronary artery disease is a major consideration in the perioperative management, and the use of a specific algorithm is recommended. Surgery is performed under general anaesthesia with intraoperative monitoring such as electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial Doppler (TCD). A temporary intraluminal shunt is used selectively if after cross-clamping the flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) falls to below 30 to 40% of baseline. For years we employed routine barbiturate neuroprotection during cross-clamping. At the present time we use barbiturate selectively, if the flow velocity in the MCA falls to below 30 to 40% of baseline and if the use of a temporary intraluminal shunt is not possible due to difficult anatomic conditions. The reason to abandon systematic barbiturate protection was to accelerate recovery from anaesthesia. Our patients are monitored overnight on the ICU or a surveillance unit. Routine hospitalization after surgery is 5 to 7 days with a control duplex sonography being performed prior to discharge. A number of details with regard to surgical technique and perioperative management are a matter of discussion. Our surgical routine is described here step by step. Such management resulted in 6 major complications among the 402 cases with 4 of cardiopulmonary and 2 of cerebrovascular origin. For the future we can expect the development of percutaneous transluminal techniques competing with standard carotid endarterectomy. At the present time several comparative studies are under way. Irrespective of the technical approach to treat carotid stenosis, several other issues have to be clarified before long. One of the major unresolved items is the timing of treatment after completed stroke. In this regard prospective trials need to be performed. Although numerically not as important as carotid stenosis, vertebral artery (VA) and subclavian artery (SA) stenoses are more and more accepted as indication for surgical

Carotid artery reconstruction and routine use of intraluminal shunt

Complications of carotid artery reconstruction were reviewed in two groups of patients. In group A (213 patients, operation 1978-85) the surgical procedure varied according to intraoperatively measured back pressure in the internal carotid artery (ACI), with temporary intraluminal shunt when the ACI pressure was < 50 mmHg, but no shunt when the pressure was higher. In group B (339 patients, operation 1986-93), shunt was used in all cases. The incidence of complications was higher in group A than in group B (21.6% vs 13%). Temporary or permanent neurologic deficit occurred in 11.3% of the group A patients and in 5.6% of the group B patients. Routine use of temporary intraluminal shunt thus resulted in fewer complications of carotid artery surgery and allowed the surgeon to work undisturbed, a prerequisite for a successful outcome.

Causes of the increased stroke rate after carotid endarterectomy in patients with previous strokes

Patients who have sustained a preoperative stroke are at increased risk for perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy. At our institution this risk was recently shown to be increased two-to threefold. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reasons for the increased surgical risk in these patients. Records of 606 patients undergoing 704 consecutive carotid endarterectomies from 1988 through 1993 were reviewed. Patients who suffered preoperative strokes (n = 183) were compared to those who were either asymptomatic or experienced only transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) preoperatively (n = 423). Of the 183 patients who had suffered preoperative strokes, eight patients who experienced perioperative strokes after endarterectomy were compared with 175 who successfully underwent surgery. Patients with a prior stroke had an increased perioperative stroke rate (4.4% versus 1.2%, p = 0.01). They had a significantly higher incidence of hypertension (62.6% versus 47.9%, p < 0.001), cardiac disease (54.7% versus 40.7%, p = 0.001), and positive smoking history (52% versus 40.6%, p = 0.01) than did the asymptomatic/TIA patients. The presence of contralateral total occlusion was also significantly increased (22% versus 10.3%, p < 0.001). Although not statistically significant due to the overall small number of patients who sustained perioperative strokes, the preoperative stroke patients who sustained perioperative strokes had a higher incidence of hypertension (87.5% versus 61.5%) and contralateral total occlusion (37.5% versus 21.3%) than did those who successfully underwent surgery. Patients with both a prior stroke and contralateral total occlusion had a 7.5% perioperative stroke rate. Patients with both a prior stroke and hypertension had a 6.1% perioperative stroke rate. The perioperative strokes in patients with prior strokes were not related to the severity of the prior stroke, the interval between the stroke and surgery, the use of a shunt, or the type of anesthesia employed. Patients who have sustained preoperative strokes have a higher incidence of significant medical illnesses and overall cerebrovascular disease. Hypertension and total occlusion of the contralateral carotid artery appear to be particularly poor prognostic indicators of outcome after endarterectomy in these patients. Patients who have sustained preoperative strokes may be more likely to display clinical neurologic symptoms in response to any form of cerebral ischemia. In this higher risk subgroup, intraoperative and surgeon-dependent factors appear to play less of a role.

Complications resulting from saphenous vein patch graft after carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Reducing surgical risks to the minimum in carotid endarterectomy has become crucial, especially with the results of recent clinical trials extending indications to asymptomatic patients. The use of the saphenous vein patch graft (SVPG) has been suggested to reduce early postoperative thrombosis and cerebral infarct as well as late recurrent stenosis. However, the exact risks and complications involved in this technique are not known.

METHODS

During a 23-year period (1972-1994), 2888 carotid endarterectomies with SVPG for primary carotid stenosis were performed by the Neurosurgical Cerebrovascular Service at the Mayo Clinic. The data from all patients were retrospectively analyzed, emphasizing postoperative complications related to SVPG.

RESULTS

There were five postoperative vein ruptures (0.17%), four cases of aneurysm formation, and three cases of deep infection necessitating surgical intervention. The vein patch ruptured in one male patient and four female patients (mean age, 69 yr). All ruptures occurred within 4 days of the primary operation, including two during the first 24 hours. All patients with rupture underwent emergency surgery and were found to have intact suture lines and tears in the middle of the grafts. Two patients recovered without deficits, one suffered major disability, and the other two died. Aneurysm of the patch developed in two male patients and two female patients (mean age, 71 yr). All of the patients developed painless pulsatile neck masses 1 to 9 years after the initial surgery; two also had recurrent ischemic symptoms. All of the patients with aneurysms underwent surgical correction without consequences.

CONCLUSION

Although the benefit of routine use of SVPG in carotid endarterectomy is still the focus of debate, this analysis showed that its use adds a small but definite risk of serious complications related to inherent weakness of the venous tissue. If a surgeon chooses to use a patch graft, our recommendation is for use of a synthetic material rather than vein.

Intraoperative urokinase infusion for embolic stroke during carotid endarterectomy

Embolic stroke is an infrequent complication of carotid endarterectomy. Somatosensory evoked potential monitoring detected delayed acute neurological deterioration during endarterectomy performed on a 71-year-old woman. Intraoperative arteriography performed via an indwelling shunt revealed thrombus within the middle cerebral artery and distal branches. A microcatheter was placed into the internal carotid artery via the arteriotomy and advanced into the middle cerebral artery. Urokinase was infused into and around the thrombus until almost complete thrombolysis had been achieved. The patient recovered quickly and was discharged without neurological deficit.

A comparative study of saphenous vein, internal jugular vein, and knitted Dacron patches for carotid artery endarterectomy

To determine whether the choice of material used for patch closure following carotid artery endarterectomy (CAE) affected the immediate operative results, the early follow-up results, or the incidence of early restenosis, a retrospective study of 275 consecutive carotid endarterectomies by two vascular surgeons was performed. Among 275 primary CAEs performed between July 1991 and August 1993, 159 (57.8%) were closed with saphenous vein (SV), 25 (9.1%) with double-thickness internal jugular vein (JV), and 91 (33.1%) with knitted Dacron (KD). Primary closure was not used in any of the arteries in this series. The overall perioperative mortality rate was 1.1% and the rate of major and minor morbidity was 4.4% There were four (1.5%) perioperative strokes: two (1.3%) in the SV group, one (4.0%) in the JV group, and one (1.1%) in the KD group. Two-hundred fifty-eight (93.8%) of the 275 endarterectomies were followed postoperatively for 2 to 35 months (mean 14.4). Two-hundred nineteen (79.6%) were evaluated using duplex scans during follow-up with a mean interval of 13.7 months. Of the arteries studied, four (3.6%) in the SV group, none in the JV group, and six (8.4%) in the KD group demonstrated restenosis of > 50% at the time of follow-up (NS). In addition, one (0.9%) artery in the SV group, one (5.6%) in the JV group, and none in the KD group demonstrated complete occlusion. Retrospective analysis of the data showed no statistically significant differences in perioperative morbidity, mortality, or early postoperative restenosis whether the artery was closed with saphenous vein, jugular vein, or knitted Dacron patches. Longer follow-up is needed to determine whether rates of late restenosis and aneurysmal dilation will differ between synthetic and autologous patches.

Carotid endarterectomy in awake patients: its safety, acceptability, and outcome

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of performing carotid endarterectomy procedures with the patient receiving cervical block anesthetic.

METHODS

Over the last 14 years, 654 carotid endarterectomy procedures were performed with patients receiving regional anesthetic. Intraluminal shunts were placed on demand, if neurologic changes with clamping of the carotid artery developed in the patient. During the same period, 419 cases were done with the patients receiving general anesthetic. Choice of anesthetic was based on surgeon and patient preference.

RESULTS

In the regional anesthetic group the indications for operation included transient ischemic attack (311), asymptomatic hemodynamically significant stenosis (146), amaurosis fugax (106), stroke (86), restenosis (3), and aneurysm (2). Shunts were used in 46 of 654 cases (7%). Conversion from regional to general anesthetic was required in seven patients (1.1%). The operative mortality rate was 0.76% (5 of 654). Permanent nonfatal neurologic deficits occurred in 0.76% (5 of 654), and temporary neurologic deficits occurred in 1.07% (7 of 654).

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of these results, we believe regional cervical block anesthetic is an acceptable option to the routine use of shunts performed with the patient receiving general anesthetic during carotid endarterectomy. In addition, the ability to continuously assess the awake patient receiving cervical block may contribute to a decrease in perioperative stroke and mortality rates while simplifying functional cerebral monitoring during carotid endarterectomy.

The cause of perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the cause of perioperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy.

METHODS

The records of 2365 patients undergoing 3062 carotid endarterectomies from 1965 through 1991 were reviewed. Sixty-six (2.2%) operations were associated with a perioperative stroke. The mechanism of stroke was determined in 63 of 66 cases. Patient risk factors and surgeon-dependent factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

More than 20 different mechanisms of perioperative stroke were identified, but most could be grouped into broad categories of ischemia during carotid artery clamping (n = 10), postoperative thrombosis and embolism (n = 25), intracerebral hemorrhage (n = 12), strokes from other mechanisms associated with the surgery (n = 8), and stroke unrelated to the reconstructed artery (n = 8). Dividing the operative experience approximately into thirds, during the years 1965 to 1979, 1980 to 1985, and 1986 to 1991 the perioperative stroke rates were 2.7%, 2.2%, and 1.5%, respectively. This, in part, is associated with a better selection of patients (more symptom free, fewer with neurologic deficits). There has been a notable decrease in perioperative stroke caused by ischemia during clamping and intracerebral hemorrhage, but postoperative thrombosis and embolism remain the major cause of neurologic complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patient selection seems to play a role, most perioperative strokes were due to technical errors made during carotid endarterectomy or reconstruction and were preventable.

Role of SEP in identifying patients requiring temporary shunt during carotid endarterectomy

EEGs and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation were recorded during 151 carotid endarterectomies, performed under general anaesthesia. Carotid occlusion did not affect either EEG or SEP in 120 cases (group A). In 31 cases the EEG showed "ischaemic" abnormalities (group B). A temporary shunt was inserted only in 16 B patients showing also severely depressed cortical SEPs within 2 min after carotid occlusion (group B shunt). In 15 B patients in whom SEPs were less affected, the operation was completed without shunt (group B no shunt). One intraoperative stroke occurred in group A and two in group B shunt. No neurological complications occurred in group B no shunt. Overall stroke rate was 2%. On retrospective analysis, latency and amplitude of N20 and P25 waves proved to be uninfluenced by carotid occlusion in group A, but were significantly affected in group B shunt. P25 amplitude alone was reduced in B no shunt. An arbitrary index (need-for-shunt index, NSI) was made in order to rate changes of P25 latency and amplitude. Its mean values were significantly different in the 3 groups. A threshold value is suggested above which shunt is required, as a useful adjunct to EEG, in order to balance prevention of brain ischaemia against the risks of shunt.

Monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during carotid endarterectomy

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were monitored in the course of 368 carotid endarterectomies (CEAs) carried out in 312 patients. In an initial group of 26 patients the shunt was used routinely while in a second group, involving 342 CEAs, it was applied selectively on the basis of modifications which the SEP underwent during clamping. The criterion for shunting was the progressive reduction, up to 50%, of the N20-P25 amplitude. New postoperative neurological deficits appeared in 6 patients, all of whom displayed a transitory SEP flattening. The SEPs of 2 of these returned to normal by the time they awoke and both showed a clinical deficit homolateral to the operated side. In only 2 cases did the deficit fail to regress completely and their postoperative CT scans revealed ischaemic lesions. A positive relationship emerged between SEP changes and back pressure values; nonetheless, as many as 75% of the patients with low residual back pressure values (less than 25 mmHg) tolerated the clamping. SEP monitoring appears to provide a reliable basis for selectively applying a shunt when there is a high risk of haemodynamic ischaemia during clamping.

Perfusion pressure breakthrough threshold of cerebral autoregulation in the chronically ischemic brain: an experimental study in cats

A study was designed to investigate hyperperfusion syndrome after the restoration of normal cerebral blood flow in a chronically cerebral ischemic state resulting from high-flow arteriovenous malformations or severe carotid stenosis. A fistula between the left distal common carotid artery and the jugular vein was created and the left vertebral artery was simultaneously occluded in 44 cats to produce a chronic cerebral ischemic state. For control experiments, 10 cats underwent occlusion of the left common carotid and vertebral arteries. Six weeks later, pial arterial behavior, disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and cerebral histological changes were investigated using three experimental methods. In the first, in which a fistula was occluded under normal conditions, pial arteries contracted to some 80% of the resting state; however, no BBB disruption or histological changes were observed. In the second experiment, in which a 20-minute occlusion of the left middle cerebral artery was performed in the cats with a patent fistula, a 30% to 40% dilated state of the pial arteries continued after recirculation, and BBB disruption-induced cerebral edema and infarction were observed. These findings were more prominent in the cats that underwent occlusion of the fistula. On the other hand, in the control group, the pial arteries returned to resting size within 40 minutes, and no BBB disruption or histological changes were observed. In the third experiment, in which moderate hypertension was induced for 1 hour, the pial arteries dilated much more remarkably; BBB disruption and cerebral edema were revealed to be more extensive in the cases of fistula occlusion than within those with a patent fistula. In the control group, however, the pial arteries contracted 10% during hypertension, while BBB disruption and histological changes were not evident. The results indicate that the perfusion pressure breakthrough threshold in the chronically ischemic brain may not be reduced by the restoration of normal blood flow, but may be decreased by the addition of new ischemic insults or hypertension.

Blowout of carotid venous patch angioplasty

Two cases of vein patch blowout were observed five and seven days after carotid bifurcation endarterectomy with patch angioplasty. Both patients died in spite of emergency reoperation. One patient developed respiratory failure with subsequent fatal cardiac arrest seven days after reoperation; the other died of extensive hemispheric infarction on the fifth postoperative day. At reoperation both ruptures were found to be located in the middle of the patch whereas the suture lines were intact. Both patients were hypertensive. In the first case, an accessory saphenous vein retrieved from the calf had been the only venous material available for the patch, while the other patient had varicose veins in the contralateral leg. Pathology revealed central transmural tissue necrosis in one of the disrupted patches. A review of the literature regarding morphologic alterations of free vein grafts placed within the arterial circulation as well as hemodynamics in patched arterial segments may provide additional insight as to the inherent benefits and risks of vein patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy. When considering vein patch angioplasty, particular attention should be directed to the gross aspect of the vein to be used as well as to any antecedent history of phlebitis.

An external carotid artery shunt to prevent cerebral ischaemia during carotid surgery

The contribution of the external carotid artery to cerebral blood flow in the presence of an internal carotid occlusion or severe stenosis is well documented. This study was undertaken in order to try and exploit the external carotid artery as a collateral pathway to avoid cerebral ischaemia during carotid surgery. The main problem is to ascertain when the external carotid artery is relevant to cerebral perfusion, and to assess if the insertion of a shunt from the common to the external carotid artery is a useful way of ensuring adequate cerebral perfusion in patients with cerebral ischaemia during carotid clamping. In order to do this, it was necessary to assay the haemodynamic role of the external carotid artery by means of a technique which monitors cerebral function in a reliable way. We tried to evaluate this possibility by an intra-operative haemodynamic study during carotid surgery in 35 patients operated on under local anaesthesia. The insertion of a shunt between the common and external carotid artery was able to reverse brain ischaemia during clamping in four of eight patients with a neurological deficit during temporary carotid occlusion. In selected cases therefore cerebral protection with an external carotid shunt might be a valuable adjunct in the performance of carotid surgery.

Pharyngeal function after carotid endarterectomy

Neurologic deficiencies, with special reference to pharyngeal function, were studied prospectively in 12 patients before and after they underwent carotid endarterectomy. Pharyngeal function was monitored with cineradiography. Five patients developed pharyngeal dysfunction: defective closure of the laryngeal vestibule, epiglottic dysmotility, and pharyngeal constrictor paresis 1 week postoperatively. In 2 patients this dysfunction remained, while in 3 it had resolved 4 weeks after the operation. Pharyngeal dysfunction was more common in patients with preoperative minor stroke and a temporary perioperative carotid shunt and in patients with a long operation time. The registered transient pharyngeal dysfunction may be due to manipulation of the cervical structures including the vagus nerve and the pharynx or due to cerebrovascular damage during the operation. Our findings support careful monitoring of postoperative oral finding in patients at risk.

Cervical wound hematoma after carotid endarterectomy

Between 1974 and 1984, 1222 patients underwent carotid endarterectomy at a large community teaching hospital. Twenty-three (1.9%) of these patients required reexploration for hematoma at the endarterectomy site. We reviewed the records of these 23 patients with regard to the incidence of perioperative hypertension; the use of platelet-altering medication, heparin, protamine sulfate, and low molecular weight dextran; and the findings at reoperation. We also reviewed the records of 122 randomly selected patients who did not develop wound hematoma after carotid endarterectomy. The incidence of intraoperative and postoperative hypertension was significantly higher in the hematoma group than in the control group. The incidence of preoperative hypertension was not significantly different between the two groups. More hematoma patients received preoperative platelet-altering medication (43% versus 25%), and fewer received intraoperative protamine sulfate to reverse the effects of heparin (48% versus 66%), but these differences were not significant. This study emphasizes the importance of careful hemodynamic monitoring during and immediately after carotid endarterectomy.

Results of microsurgical carotid endarterectomy. A prospective study with transcranial Doppler and EEG monitoring, and elective shunting

100 consecutive carotid endarterectomies in a total of 93 patients were performed using the operative microscope. Cerebral perfusion and activity were monitored with simultaneous transcranial Doppler (TCD) and EEG. Thiopentone for cerebral protection was given prior to carotid clamping in 11 cases when an insufficient collateral circulation was suspected on the basis of the pre-operative TCD or angiography and if temporary intraluminal shunting was to be avoided because of a high bifurcation, long stenosis or associated carotid artery kinking. A temporary intraluminal shunt was inserted electively if the mean middle cerebral artery flow velocity fell after cross-clamping below 30-40%. Direct closure of the arteriotomy was preferred over a patch graft, which was performed only in cases with concomitant stricture of the arterial wall. No peri-operative strokes occurred in the present series. Two patients died due to medical complications in the post-operative period. During the mean follow-up of 15 months, 1 patient suffered a lethal stroke ipsilateral to the treated carotid artery and another patient had a minor contralateral stroke. Two patients died of unrelated causes during follow-up. Two patients suffered a single reversible neurologic deficit corresponding to the treated carotid territory. Four other patients had a single contralateral hemispheric or retinal reversible ischaemic attack during follow-up.