Pharmacological properties of cephalosporins

Cephalotin Versus Dicloxacillin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

First-line treatments for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) bacteraemia are nafcillin, oxacillin, or cefazolin. Regional shortages of these antibiotics force clinicians to use other options like dicloxacillin and cephalotin. This study aims to describe and compare the safety and efficacy of cephalotin and dicloxacillin for the treatment of MSSA bacteraemia.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in a referral centre in Mexico City. We identified MSSA isolates in blood cultures from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2022. Patients ≥ 18 years of age, with a first episode of MSSA bacteraemia, who received cephalotin or dicloxacillin as the definitive antibiotic treatment, were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

We included 202 patients, of which 48% (97/202) received cephalotin as the definitive therapy and 52% (105/202) received dicloxacillin. In-hospital all-cause mortality was 20.7% (42/202). There were no differences in all-cause in-hospital mortality between patients receiving cephalotin or dicloxacillin (20% vs. 21%, p = 0.43), nor in 30-day all-cause mortality (14% vs. 18%, p = 0.57) or 90-day all-cause mortality (24% vs. 22%, p = 0.82). No severe adverse reactions were associated with either antibiotic.

CONCLUSIONS

Cephalotin and dicloxacillin were equally effective for treating MSSA bacteraemia, and both showed an adequate safety profile.

Complex-Forming Properties of Ceftazidime with Fe(III) Ions in an Aqueous Solution

In the present study, the complexing properties of ceftazidime with Fe(III) ions in aqueous solutions were characterized by UV-vis spectrophotometric and potentiometric methods. Using the UV-vis spectrophotometric method, the absorbance values for Fe(III) ions, a third-generation cephalosporin antibiotic (ceftazidime), and the Fe(III)-ceftazidime system were determined. Based on pH-metric studies, the value of the stability constant for the Fe(III)-ceftazidime complex was calculated.

Prevalence and clinical characteristics of antibiotics associated drug induced liver injury

Background

The use of antibiotics increases recently. Accordingly, the incidence of antibiotics associated with drug induced liver injury (DILI) also increases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the proportion and the clinical characteristics of antibiotic associated with DILI.

Methods

This study is a retrospective study of analyzed adult patients who were referred to the department of hepatology for the elevation of liver function tests and the frequency of elevated liver enzyme of patients with prescribed antibiotics during the same period at outpatient setting as a validation set.

Results

Antibiotics associated with DILI (64.0%) are the most common reason agent among consulting to hepatology department. Rheumatoid arthritis related drugs (11.0%), health supplements (5.0%), herbal medicines (4.0%), anti-viral drugs, anti-inflammatory analgesics/acetaminophen and lipid-lowering agents (3.0%) were next common causative drug for DILI in inpatients setting (training set). The frequency of antibiotics associated with DILI was high in order of flomoxef, cetrazole, ceftriaxone, vancomycin, piperacillin/tazobactam and amoxicillin/clavulanate. In the same period, 32% of the patients who prescribed flomoxef showed elevated liver enzyme levels above the upper normal limit. The prevalence of flomoxef induced DILI (>3 folds of ALT) was 13% and liver enzyme levels were five times higher than upper normal limits in 5% of flomoxef groups. Hypertension or diabetes was the risk factor of flomoxef associated with DILI.

Conclusions

The Prevalence of antibiotics associated with DILI was 2-14%. Co-morbidity with diabetes and hypertension was the risk factor of flomoxef associated with DILI.

Cephalothin: Review of Characteristics, Properties and Status of Analytical Methods

BACKGROUND

Cephalothin (CET), a first generation cephalosporin, is the most efficient cephalosporin against resistant microorganisms. Many studies found in literature and pharmacopeias proposes analytical methods and, as most commonly, HPLC and microbiological assays.

OBJECTIVE

This paper shows a brief review of analytical method to quantify CET with a green analytical chemistry approach.

METHODS

The research data were collected from the literature and official compendia.

RESULTS

Most of the analytical methods to determine CET were performed by HPLC and agar diffusion in pharmaceuticals, blood, urine or water. Other analytical methods were found, as UV, Vis, iodometry, fluorimetry, IR/Raman, electrochemical among others, but, in less quantity. One important aspect is that these methods use organic and toxic solvents like methanol and acetonitrile, and only about 4% of the methods found uses water as solvent.

CONCLUSIONS

In this way, researches about analytical methods focused on green analytical chemistry for CET are of great importance and very relevant to optimize its analysis in pharmaceutical industries and to guarantee the quality of the product. More than just the development of new techniques it is possible to enhance of the ones that already exists applying the green analytical chemistry principles. In this way, it will be possible to reduce the environment impacts caused by these analytical procedures.

HIGHLIGHTS

This work shows a brief review of literature and pharmacopeias of analytical methods to quantify CET. Its quality control can be updated to meet the needs of current analytical chemistry and to fit into sustainable and eco-friendly analyzes.

Is There a Difference in Infection Risk Between Single and Multiple Doses of Prophylactic Antibiotics? A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prevention of surgical site infection guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently recommended that only a single dose of preoperative antibiotics be administered to patients undergoing clean-contaminated procedures based on data from a variety of surgical disciplines. For orthopaedic procedures, where postoperative infections can have significant consequences, the existing evidence for this recommendation is widely debated.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Is there a difference in postoperative infection risk when utilizing a single dose of preoperative antibiotics compared with multiple doses of perioperative antibiotics for orthopaedic procedures where implants are placed?

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane were systematically reviewed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of a single dose of preoperative antibiotics compared with pre- and postoperative prophylaxis from 1980 to 2017 for all orthopaedic procedures where implants were being placed. Infection (both superficial and deep) as a primary outcome through all available followup was required for inclusion. Fourteen RCTs detailing 9691 orthopaedic procedures were included for analysis, including seven arthroplasty, one spine, and six general orthopaedic trials (two specific to hip fracture fixation). Pooled infection outcomes were analyzed with random-effects modeling in light of study heterogeneity. Bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool as well as a funnel plot for publication bias, and quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Bias was largely uncertain; however, a high risk of bias was noted in four studies. No significant overall publication bias was noted. The quality of evidence was determined to be very low based on the GRADE tool, downgraded based on risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Despite the quality of evidence, the data were pooled in light of the current recommendations from the CDC to critically evaluate the recommendation that a single dose of antibiotics be utilized.

RESULTS

There were no differences in infection risk between single- versus multiple-dose groups (single: 83 of 4263 [2%], multiple: 101 of 5428 [2%]; odds ratio, 0.92 [95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.51]; p = 0.740, I = 36% for statistical heterogeneity).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no difference in infection risk between a single dose and multiple doses of perioperative antibiotics for orthopaedic procedures where implants are utilized, consistent with recent recommendations. However, the quality of evidence for orthopaedic procedures is low, and a randomized study with a sufficient sample size is needed to examine the issue before universal adoption of a single antibiotic dose.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

Population pharmacokinetics and dosing optimization of latamoxef in neonates and young infants

OBJECTIVES

There has been recent renewed interest in historical antibiotics because of the increased antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains. Latamoxef, a semi-synthetic oxacephem antibiotic developed in 1980s, has recently been brought back into use for treatment of infections in newborns; however, it is still used off-label in neonatal clinical practice due to the lack of an evidence-based dosing regimen. This study was performed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of latamoxef in neonates and young infants, and to provide an evidence-based dosing regimen for newborns based on developmental pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD).

METHODS

Opportunistic blood samples from newborns treated with latamoxef were collected to determine the latamoxef concentration by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. Population PK-PD analysis was conducted using NONMEM and R software. A total of 165 plasma samples from 128 newborns (postmenstrual age range 28.4-46.1 weeks) were available for analysis.

RESULTS

A two-compartment model with first-order elimination showed the best fit with the data. Current body weight, birth weight, and postnatal age were identified as significant covariates influencing latamoxef clearance. Simulation indicated that the current dosing regimen (30 mg/kg q12h) is adequate with an MIC of 1 mg/L. For an MIC of 4 mg/L, 30 mg/kg q8h was required to achieve a target rate of 70% of patients having a free antimicrobial drug concentration exceeding the MIC during 70% of the dosing interval.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the developmental PK-PD analysis of latamoxef, a rational dosing regimen of 30 mg/kg q12h or q8h was required in newborns, depending on the pathogen.

Hypoprothrombinemia and severe perioperative haemorrhagic complications in cardiac surgery patients treated with high-dose cefazolin for infective endocarditis

Endocarditis is a serious and common disease that requires prolonged antimicrobial therapy. The recent shortage of oxacillin has led to the use of other antimicrobial agents such as cefazolin to treat endocarditis due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. We describe four cases of life-threatening haemorrhagic complications (fatal in two cases) in patients treated with high-dose cefazolin. All of these patients with major bleeding presented with hypoprothrombinemia secondary to hypovitaminosis K. This adverse event may be due to inhibition of vitamin K epoxide reductase and/or gamma-glutamyl-carboxylase by the 2-methyl-1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-thiol group of cefazolin. This inhibition may result in hypoprothrombinemia by altering the synthesis of vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors. The increasing use of cefazolin, especially at a high dose and for a prolonged period of time, should be accompanied by regular monitoring of coagulation, including prothrombin index, and vitamin K supplementation.

Donor-derived bacteremia in liver transplant recipients despite antibiotic prophylaxis

As the disparity between the number of candidates listed for transplant and the number of donors continues to grow, marginal organ donors are increasingly utilized. This includes bacteremic donors which may carry an increased risk of transmission of infection. It is recommended that recipients of organs from bacteremic donors receive antibiotic prophylaxis based on the susceptibilities of the donor isolate to prevent transmission. Here, we present four cases of donor-derived bacteremia, despite appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis, in four liver transplant recipients. Transmitted pathogens included Staphylococcus aureus in two cases, and Escherichia coli and Group B Streptococcus each in one case. Interestingly, none of the nonhepatic organs (n=10) utilized from these bacteremic donors resulted in transmissions. These cases highlight the fact that risk of transmission from bacteremic donors is not eliminated with antimicrobial therapy in the donor and recipient. As no transmissions occurred in recipients of nonhepatic organs from these donors, these cases also suggest that liver recipients may be at higher risk of donor transmitted bacteremia.

Ertapenem: review of a new carbapenem

The carbapenems are beta-lactam-type antibiotics with an exceptionally broad spectrum of activity. Ertapenem is a new carbapenem developed to address the pharmacokinetic shortcomings (short half-life) of imipenem and meropenem. Ertapenem shares similar structural features with meropenem, including its stability to dehydropeptidase-1, allowing it to be administered without a dehydropeptidase-1 inhibitor. Ertapenem, like imipenem and meropenem, demonstrates broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against many Gram-positive and -negative aerobes and anaerobes and is resistant to nearly all beta-lactamases, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and AmpCs. However, it differs from both imipenem and meropenem in demonstrating limited activity against Enterococcusspp., Pseudomonasaeruginosa and other nonfermentative Gram-negative bacteria commonly associated with nosocomial infections. The extensive protein binding of ertapenem extends the half-life and allows for once-daily dosing. Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, comparative clinical studies demonstrate similar clinical efficacy of ertapenem compared with other agents. Clinical trials of complicated intra-abdominal infection, acute pelvic infection, complicated skin and soft-structure infection, community-acquired pneumonia and complicated urinary tract infections demonstrated that ertapenem has equivalent efficacy and safety compared with ceftriaxone and piperacillin/tazobactam. Ertapenem is a promising new carbapenem with excellent efficacy and safety for the treatment of a variety of community-acquired infections. It also appears to be of great value as an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.

Efficacies of cefotaxime and ceftriaxone in a mouse model of pneumonia induced by two penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae

We previously demonstrated the efficacy of ceftriaxone (CRO), at 50 mg/kg of body weight every 12 h, against a highly penicillin-resistant (MIC, 4 micrograms/ml) Streptococcus pneumoniae strain with low-level resistance to CRO (MIC, 0.5 microgram/ml) in a leukopenic-mouse pneumonia model (P. Moine, E. Vallée, E. Azoulay-Dupuis, P. Bourget, J.-P. Bédos, J. Bauchet, and J.-J. Pocidalo, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38:1953-1958, 1994). In the present study, we assessed the activity of CRO versus those of cefotaxime (CTX) and amoxicillin (AMO) against two highly penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains (P40422 and P40984) (MICs of 2 and 8 for penicillin, 2 and 4 for AMO, and 4 and 8 for CRO or CTX, respectively). Against both strains, a greater than an 80% cumulative survival rate was observed with CRO at a dose of 100 or 200 mg/kg every 12 h (dose/MIC ratio, 25). With CTX, a high dosage of 400 mg/kg (dose/MIC ratio, 100 or 50) administered every 8 h (TID) was needed to protect 66 and 75% of the animals, respectively, with no statistically significant differences versus CRO. Against the P40422 strain, CRO (100 mg/kg) produced the greatest bactericidal effect, from the 8th to the 24th hour after a single injection (1.8-log-unit reduction over 24 h), and the fastest bacterial pulmonary clearance during treatment; with CTX, only multiple injections at a high dosage, i.e., 400 mg/kg TID, demonstrated a significant bactericidal effect. AMO in a high dosage, 400 mg/kg (dose/MIC ratio, 200) TID, showed good activity only against the P40422 strain. Despite the identical MICs of CTX and CRO, the longer time (3.6 to 4.6 h) that serum CRO concentrations remained above the MICs for the pathogens at a dose of 100 mg/kg resulted in greater efficacy versus CTX against highly penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant S. pneumoniae strains.

Comparison of flomoxef with latamoxef in the treatment of sepsis and/or Gram-negative bacteremia in adult patients

The safety and efficacy of flomoxef and latamoxef were compared in the treatment of hospitalized patients with sepsis and/or Gram-negative bacteremia in a prospective, open-labelled clinical trial. Patients were randomized to receive 1 to 2 g intravenous doses of either flomoxef every 6 to 12 h, or latamoxef every 8 to 12 h. Data from 21 patients given flomoxef and 23 patients given latamoxef were included in the evaluation of efficacy. Flomoxef produced clinical cure and satisfactory microbiological responses in 85.7% and 100% of patients, respectively. These results were similar to those obtained with latamoxef (87% and 100%, respectively). In addition, no significant difference was found in mean age, sex, severity of infection, distribution of pathogens and focus of infection between the two groups. However, the flomoxef group included more patients with ultimately fatal diseases. Six patients given flomoxef and two patients given latamoxef developed superinfections caused by yeast, enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the urinary tract. Mild and reversible adverse reactions probably related to flomoxef and latamoxef were noted in 14.3% and 13% of patients, respectively. The results of this study demonstrated that flomoxef is a safe and effective antimicrobial agent in the treatment of patients with sepsis and/or Gram-negative bacteremia.

In vivo efficacy of a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, ceftriaxone, against penicillin-susceptible and -resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae in a mouse pneumonia model

The increasing emergence of penicillin-resistant (Pr) strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae could pose a therapeutic problem in the next few years. Ceftriaxone (CRO), a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, exhibits a smaller increase in MICs against Pr S. pneumoniae strains than amoxicillin (AMO) (usually referred as to the "gold standard" therapy for pneumococcal infections). Therefore, we compared their respective efficacies in a leukopenic Swiss mouse model of pneumococcal pneumonia. Infection was induced with two serotype 19 strains: a penicillin-susceptible (Ps) strain (MICs of < 0.01 for penicillin, 0.03 for AMO, and 0.03 for CRO) and a Pr strain (MICs of 4 for penicillin, 2 for AMO, and 0.5 for CRO). Untreated mice died within 2 or 3 days. Against the Ps strain, the minimal protective dose (two subcutaneous injections at 12-h intervals for 3 days) for both CRO and AMO was 5 mg/kg of body weight (87% survivors). Ten-fold-increased doses of CRO (50 mg/kg) gave similar protection (75% survivors) against the Pr strain, whereas 20- and 40-fold-increased doses of AMO protected 0 and 34% of the animals, respectively, against the Ps strain. CRO had a marked and prolonged antibacterial effect in the lungs (2.7-log-unit reduction of CFU in 24 h after a single 50-mg/kg injection) against the Pr strain in comparison with AMO. A standard dosage of 50 mg of CRO per kg in mice resulted in peak levels in serum and protein binding comparable to those observed with 1 g given intravenously in humans. This dosage remained effective against a highly Pr S. pneumoniae strain in this model. The microbiological activity and pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of CRO (time during which concentrations exceed the MIC for the test pathogen [delta t MIC], > or less than 8 h; and peak/MIC ratio, >90 for free active drug) accounted for its efficacy relative to AMO (50 mg/kg: delta t MIC, <2; peak/MIC ratio, <25) against the highly Pr S. pneumoniae strain used in this study.

Cefpirome clinical pharmacokinetics

Cefpirome is a new cephalosporin that exhibits similar in vitro potency to ceftazidime against Gram-negative organisms but has significantly greater in vitro potency against Gram-positive organisms. Cefpirome differs from cefotaxime in that a 3'-pyridinium moiety replaces the acetoxy moiety of cefotaxime. This structural change imparts greater beta-lactamase stability, increases the ability to penetrate the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, and enhances activity against Gram-positive organisms. The pharmacokinetic properties of cefpirome are typical of cephalosporins. The drug can be administered by intravenous or intramuscular injection, but is not well absorbed after oral administration. Bioavailability following intramuscular injection exceeds 90%. Cefpirome exhibits low protein binding (approximately 10%) and has a volume of distribution similar to extracellular fluid volume. Cefpirome penetrates the prostate gland, lung, blister fluid, cerebrospinal fluid and peritoneal fluid, reaching concentrations that are similar to those achieved by other later generation cephalosporins. Approximately 80% of an intravenous dose is eliminated unchanged in the urine. No active metabolites of cefpirome have been identified. The elimination half-life of cefpirome is approximately 2 hours. Elimination appears to be primarily by glomerular filtration since the total clearance of cefpirome is approximately equal to creatinine clearance. The time during which drug concentrations exceed the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) represents the most clinically important pharmacodynamic parameter for beta-lactam agents. When cefpirome is administered at a dosage of 2g every 12 hours to patients without renal insufficiency [creatinine clearance 70 ml/min (4.2 L/h)], drug concentrations continuously remain above the MIC for pathogens with MIC values of < or = 2 micrograms/ml. With this dosage regimen, drug concentrations will be above the MIC for a pathogen with an MIC of 4 micrograms/ml for 80% of the dosage interval. The time above MIC for pathogens with an MIC of 8 micrograms/ml is only 60% of the dosage interval.