Anterior and low anterior resection

Cyanoacrylate in Colorectal Surgery: Is It Safe?

Anastomotic leakage (AL) of a gastrointestinal (GI) anastomosis continues to be an important complication in GI surgery. Since its introduction more than 60 years ago, Cyanoacrylate (CA) has gained popularity in colorectal surgery to provide "prophylaxis" against AL. However, although in surgical practice it is increasingly used, evidence on humans is still lacking. The aim of this study is to analyze in humans the safety of CA to seal colorectal anastomosis. All consecutive patients from Jannuary 2022 through December 2022 who underwent minimally invasive colorectal surgery were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively maintained database. Inclusion criteria were a histological diagnosis of cancer, a totally minimally invasive procedure, and the absence of intraoperative complications. 103 patients were included in the study; N-butyl cyanoacrylate with metacryloxisulfolane (Glubran 2®) was used to seal colorectal anastomosis, no adverse reactions to CA or postoperative complications related to inflammation and adhesions occurred; and only one case of AL (0.9%) was recorded. We can consider this study an important proof of concept on the safety of CA to seal colorectal anastomosis. It opens the possibility of starting prospective and comparative studies in humans to evaluate the effectiveness of CA in preventing colorectal AL.

Cyanoacrylate for colonic anastomosis; is it safe?

BACKGROUND

This experimental study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of using cyanoacrylate adhesive for sutureless colonic anastomosis and as a protective seal to prevent leakage.

METHODS

Sixty male Sprague-Dawley rats (300 +/- 10 g, 9 weeks old) were divided into three groups: in group I, the anastomosis was sutured in a single layer with 5-0 polypropylene; in group II, the anastomosis was fixed using N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl(R)); and in group III, the anastomosis was sutured and then sealed with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. The rats were sacrificed on postoperative day 7. The anastomoses among the three groups were compared by measuring wound infection, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, adhesion formation, anastomotic bursting pressure, and histological appearance.

RESULTS

No anastomotic leakage was observed in any group. Anastomotic stricture was significantly more extensive in groups II and III (p < 0.001). Bursting pressure was significantly lower in groups II and III (168 +/- 58, 45 +/- 21, and 60 +/- 38 mmHg for groups I to III, respectively, p < 0.001). The severity of inflammatory reactions was significantly greater and collagen deposition was significantly lower in groups II and III (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate could be a useful method for sutureless colonic anastomosis based on the absence of anastomotic leakage, but it may impede healing of the colonic anastomosis. In addition, when used to seal sutured colonic anastomoses, cyanoacrylate may have a negative influence on anastomotic healing. The clinical use of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate in colonic anastomosis does not appear to be acceptable and safer anastomotic methods or alternative forms of cyanoacrylate should be developed.

Safety and efficacy of low anterior en bloc resection as part of cytoreductive surgery for patients with ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To examine the feasibility and safety of a low anterior resection of the rectosigmoid plus adjacent pelvic tumour as part of primary cytoreduction for ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This study included 65 consecutive patients with primary ovarian cancer who had debulking surgery from 1996 through 2000. All patients underwent an en bloc resection of ovarian cancer and a rectosigmoid resection followed by an end-to-end anastomosis. Parameters for safety and efficacy were considered as primary statistical endpoints for the aim of this analysis.

RESULTS

Postoperative residual tumour was nil, <1 cm, and >1 cm in 14, 34, and 14 patients, respectively. The median postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (range, 6 to 50 days). Intraoperative complications included an injury to the urinary bladder in one patient. Postoperative complications included wound complications (n = 14, 21.5%), septicemia (n = 9, 13.8%), cardiac complications (n = 7, 10.8%), thromboembolic complications (n = 5, 7.7%), ileus (n = 2, 3.1%), anastomotic leak (n = 2, 3.1%), and fistula (n = 1, 1.5%). Reasons for a reoperation during the same admission included repair of an anastomotic leak (n = 1), postoperative hemorrhage (n = 1), and wound debridement (n = 1). Wound complications, septicemia, and anastomotic leak formation were more frequent in patients who had a serum albumin level of < or =30 g/L preoperatively. There was one surgically related mortality in a patient who died from a cerebral vascular accident 2 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

An en bloc resection as part of primary cytoreductive surgery for ovarian cancer is effective and its morbidity is acceptably low.

Role of local excision in the treatment of rectal cancer

Local excision (LE) of properly selected rectal cancers can provide long-term survival, with minimal morbidity, negligible mortality, and excellent functional results. The role of LE has evolved over the past century. Initially, to avoid the excessive mortality of abdominal surgery, aggressive LE was performed to control the symptoms of rectal cancer. As abdominal surgery became safer, LE was restricted for use in palliation or high-risk patients. Better preoperative tumor staging resulted in an expanded role for LE, including curative-intent treatment of selected T(1-2) rectal cancers. Techniques for LE include snare polypectomy, transanal excision, transanal endoscopic microsurgery, and posterior approaches. The high local recurrence rate and compromised survival reported in modern series, despite efforts to properly select patients with cancers suitable for LE, have convinced the authors to restrict the use of curative-intent LE in good-risk patients only to the most favorable rectal cancers. Close follow-up after LE is critical, because radical surgical salvage is usually possible if recurrence is identified promptly. Whether adjuvant chemoradiation can expand the role of curative intent LE remains controversial.

Operative mortality in carcinoma of the rectum. Results of the German Multicentre Study

An analysis of operative mortality for carcinoma of the rectum in the German Study Group Colo-Rectal Carcinoma (SGCRC) comprising 1115 operated patients, found a total operative mortality rate of 4.3% and a 30-day-mortality rate of 2.8%. Advanced age, severe concurrent disease, anastomotic leakage in anterior resections and institution were found to be factors with independent significant influence. In anterior resections, especially low anterior resections, with protective enterostomy, the lower rates of anastomotic leakage and mortality emphasize the advantages of protective enterostomy.

Recent advances in surgery for colon and rectal cancer

Surgery is the mainstay of therapy for colon and rectal cancer. Over the past several decades, there have been important advances both in the understanding of the biology of colon and rectal cancer and in the preoperative and operative techniques for treating this disease. Although it appears in some studies that we have made a difference in the survival rates in the treatment of colon and rectal cancer, in actual fact, this phenomenon may only be secondary to better staging and, therefore, a greater ability to prognosticate a particular patient's chance of cure. What has been learned in the past 20 to 30 years is that most colon and rectal carcinomas start as polyps of the colon and rectum. Most often, polyps are sporadic, but there are certain high-risk groups that produce polyps and, consequently, colon and rectal cancer at a much higher rate. The goal of a practicing physician is to identify these high-risk individuals and to recommend frequent screenings so as to intervene before a polyp has had a chance to become a deeply invasive cancer. These high-risk groups are best typified by familial adenomatous polyposis, which if left untreated will, in 100% of cases, lead to the death of a patient from colon or rectal cancer. Other diseases that lead to an increase in colon and rectal cancer but may not go through the usual adenoma-to-carcinoma sequence include inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn's colitis and ulcerative colitis. Most patients with colorectal carcinoma are asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. This phenomenon has led to efforts to screen the general population for polyps and for cancer. Screening techniques such as the detection of occult blood in the stool and endoscopic procedures are currently the most popular. It is unclear at this time exactly what the efficacy of these techniques is in improving the survival of the general population from colorectal carcinoma. The surgical techniques to remove colon and rectal carcinomas have recently expanded to include a more aggressive local excision policy for small tumors of the rectum and the application of laparoscopic techniques, new stapling techniques, and new anastomosing techniques for tumors of the colon and rectum. These techniques have become possible in part through advances in surgical instrumentation and also in part from our increasing understanding of the biology of the disease. Both have allowed for more creative approaches to diagnosing and treating colon and rectal cancer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Results of 1,000 single-layer continuous polypropylene intestinal anastomoses

Between 1979 and 1988, we created intestinal anastomoses in 1,000 patients using a single-layer, continuous suturing technique and a polypropylene suture. The technique is easily learned, flexible in its application, and incurs less cost than most other techniques. The anastomoses involved all levels of the colon and the upper (intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal) rectum. All patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year. The clinically suspected anastomotic leak rate was 1%. Other morbidity included would complications (2%), obstruction of the small intestine (2%), anastomotic stricture (1%), and death (1%). No death was due to anastomotic complications. These rates of complications are comparable with, and in many instances lower than, those reported with other techniques of intestinal anastomosis.

[Vascular anatomy of the anorectal transition]

Based on selective dye injection studies, the regions of supply of the 3 rectal arteries have been defined. The cranial portion of the rectum receives its blood supply from the superior rectal artery, the inferior rectal artery supplies the entire rectal wall in a fan-shaped configuration up to the dentate line. A wedge-shaped portion of the muscularis in the proximal distribution of the inferior rectal artery receives a relatively reduced supply. The middle rectal artery can supply a variable portion of the muscularis which is usually supplied by the distal superior rectal artery. Intramural anastomoses between these regions exist only between the superior and inferior rectal arteries at the level of the dentate line in the submucosa.

Management of the pelvic space following low anterior resection

Four cases of low anterior resection without pelvic drainage are described. The outcome was unsatisfactory in three of the four patients. The role of pelvic drains and omentum in the management of the pelvic space following low anterior resection for rectal cancer is reviewed and discussed. Pelvic drains are required to remove blood and omentum may be used to fill the pelvic space. Pelvic collections are related to anastomotic leakage and the optimal management of the pelvic space can reduce the incidence of this complication. A suggested regimen for management of the pelvic space after low anterior resection is outlined.

Early complications after low anterior resection for rectal cancer using the EEA stapling device. A prospective trial

Complications following 178 low anterior resections for rectal carcinoma with the EEA autosuture device are reported prospectively. The operative mortality was 2.8 percent. Clinical anastomotic leakage developed in 27 patients, but in none of the 30 patients over 76 years of age. Two of the five hospital deaths were related to leakage. Long-term steroid treatment and previous pelvic radiotherapy were associated with increased risk of leakage. Severe stenosis following anastomotic leakage was seen in one patient. Intraoperative diverting colostomy was done in 16 patients, but no benefit could be demonstrated. It was concluded that use of the upper sigmoid colon for anastomosis probably is not associated with a higher mortality and morbidity than that after more extensive resections reported in the literature. Future randomized trials should exclude very old patients, in whom no leak was seen, when the upper sigmoid colon was used for stapling after low anterior resection.

Analysis of recurrence following curative low anterior resection and stapled anastomoses for carcinoma of the middle third and lower rectum

In a series of 93 patients with middle and lower rectal cancer, who underwent potentially curative surgery by low anterior resection (LAR) with EEA stapled anastomosis or by abdominoperineal excision (APE) between January 1977 and December 1981, the incidence of recurrence and survival rate was compared. LAR with stapler was performed in 61 patients: 55 (90.2 percent) with tumors of the middle third and six (9.8 percent) for tumors of the lower third of the rectum. APE was performed in 32 patients: 13 (40.6 percent) with cancer of the midrectum and 19 (59.4 percent) of the lower rectum. Tumor site, Dukes' distribution, grade of malignancy, and extent of local spread were recorded. The tumor stages for LAR with stapler and for APE, respectively, were Dukes' A 7/1; Dukes' B 27/10; Dukes' C 25/18; Dukes' D 2/3. In a follow-up period of four years (range, 6 to 52 months) the overall recurrence rates were 20.4 percent in the LAR with stapled anastomosis group and 21 percent in the APE group. Local recurrence percentages were 9.8 percent after LAR and 14 percent after APE (P = N.S.). Distant recurrences were 12 percent and 14 percent, respectively. The four-year overall survival rates were 76.7 percent after LAR and 65.5 percent after APE (P = N.S.) The clinical and pathologic factors correlated with recurrence in low rectal carcinoma were reanalyzed and the controversial points of the surgical management for and against LAR with stapled anastomosis and APE were discussed. It is concluded that LAR with the EEA stapler can be carried out in the middle and lower rectum with the prospect of ultimate cure, when performed with proper technical skills in selected patients.

Resection of abdominal hollow organs by laser

During a ten-year period 642 abdominal hollow organ resections have been performed by means of a new, original technique--that is, CO2 laser irradiation combined with specially designed instrumentation. This resulted in a remarkable decrease in postoperative morbidity and mortality. The article describes the laser procedure.

[Is the protective colostomy in left-sided resections of the colorectum necessary?]

In a prospective clinical study 100 left-side colon and anterior rectum resections were performed without a protective colostomy under standardized conditions: Whole gut lavage, oral and systemic antibiotic prophylaxis, parenteral highcaloric nutrition perioperatively, anastomosing technique end to end, single layer, with atraumatic sutures (3 X 0 Vicryl, Dexon) or EEA stapler. A clinically relevant insufficiency of the anastomosis was seen in 4%, wound-healing impairment in 7%, only one patient died. Due to careful preparation and operation technique the frequency of septic complications and mortality nowadays is very low. On the other side a protective colostomy is afflicted with psychical problems to the patient, higher costs because of the longer period of hospitalization and a not unimportant number of complications of colostomy closure. Therefore we consider the routine usage of protective colostomy as not being necessary in elective colon and anterior rectum resections.

Determinants of wound infection after colon surgery

Over a period of 54 months, every patient undergoing colon surgery at the Hadassah University Hospital in Jerusalem was followed up prospectively by the same nurse epidemiologist. A total of 403 patients completed the analysis. Risk factors for postoperative wound infection were explored in an epidemiological study, using both single and multivariate analysis. Of the 13 potential risk factors investigated, the four showing the highest association with wound infection were: the performance of more than one operation during a single admission; Arab ethnicity; the use of open drains; and the performance of a colostomy. In patients undergoing more than one operation, the risk for infection was greater if the second operation followed a surgical complication than if it was performed as an elective second procedure; whether the first operation was elective or not did not affect the infection rate. Second operations performed within 7 days of the first carried a higher risk for infection than those performed later. The different prophylactic protocols used during the period of investigation did not have an independently significant contribution to the risk of infection.

EEA stapler for mid-rectum carcinoma. Review of recent literature and own initial experience

Over a three-year period, 1980-82, 79 per cent of our patients with rectal cancer were treated with the intention of cure, and sphincter-saving procedures were performed in 62 per cent of these cases. This report concerns 21 patients with mid-rectum cancer operated on with low anterior resection and extraperitoneal EEA-stapled anastomosis. Nine patients had Dukes' stage A tumors, seven had stage B, and five had stage C tumors. An 86-year-old woman died in the sixth postoperative week, and a 74-year-old man died after 20 months with a probable recurrence. Nineteen patients are currently alive 4 to 40 months post-operatively, with no overt signs of recurrence. We cannot confirm recent alarming reports on a significant incidence of early local recurrence. Routine Gastrografin enemas were performed and offered very little in terms of clinical guidance. Significant anastomotic leakage occurred in four patients, although without clinical symptoms or the need for fecal diversion. Despite initially intact anastomoses in 13 patients, pelvic sepsis with late dehiscence developed in three, all of whom required fecal diversion. The clinical leak rate was thus 3 of 21, 14 per cent, and the total incidence of leakage 7 of 21, 33 per cent. We performed routine colostomy on the first three patients but, in retrospect, believe this was unneccessary. Only one of the 19 survivors still has a colostomy, due to a benign anastomotic stricture. We consider anterior resection of mid-rectum carcinoma with EEA-stapled anastomosis a highly feasible procedure, the curative potential of which, however, can be established only by long-term follow-up studies.