In vitro activity of trovafloxacin (CP-99,219), sparfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and fleroxacin against respiratory pathogens

A review of worldwide experience with sparfloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

The worldwide occurrence of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) shows an undiminished prevalence of this serious illness and hospitalisation is common in those patients with severe illness. The diversity of bacterial pathogens that can act as aetiologic agents presents a challenge to initial empiric antimicrobial management. In recent years, treatment has been further complicated by an increased incidence of antibiotic resistance in pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. The newly available fluoroquinolones including sparfloxacin offer an alternative approach to empiric management. Sparfloxacin is active against many typical and atypical pathogens, as well as strains resistant to conventional agents. In comparative studies, the in vitro potency of sparfloxacin and its pharmacokinetic profile have been confirmed. The clinical trial efficacy and safety data suggest it might be a useful empiric therapy for both CAP and acute bacterial exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

The new fluoroquinolones: A critical review

OBJECTIVE

This paper reviews the literature available on the new fluoroquinolones - clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin - to compare these agents with each other and contrast them with ciprofloxacin, an older fluoroquinolone.

DATA SELECTION

Published papers used were obtained by searching MEDLINE for articles published between 1994 and 1998, inclusive. References of published papers were also obtained and reviewed. Abstracts from scientific proceedings were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

Due to the limited data available on several of the agents, criteria for study inclusion in the in vitro, pharmacokinetics and in vivo sections were not restrictive.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The new fluoroquinolones offer excellent Gram-negative bacillary activity and improved Gram-positive activity (eg, against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus) over ciprofloxacin. Clinafloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, sparfloxacin and trovafloxacin display improved activity against anaerobes (eg, Bacteriodes fragilis). All of the new fluoroquinolones have a longer serum half-life than ciprofloxacin (allowing for once daily dosing), and several are eliminated predominantly by nonrenal means. No clinical trials are available comparing the new fluoroquinolones with each other. Clinical trials comparing the new fluoroquinolones with standard therapy have demonstrated good efficacy in a variety of infections. Their adverse effect profile is similar to that of ciprofloxacin. Clinafloxacin and sparfloxacin cause a high incidence of phototoxicity (1.5% to 14% and 2% to 11.7%, respectively), grepafloxacin causes a high incidence of taste perversion (9% to 17%) and trovafloxacin causes a high incidence of dizziness (11%). They all interact with metal ion-containing drugs (eg, antacids), and clinafloxacin and grepafloxacin interact with theophylline. The new fluoroquinolones are expensive; however, their use may result in savings in situations where, because of their potent and broad spectrum of activity, they can be used orally in place of intravenous antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The new fluoroquinolones offer advantages over ciprofloxacin in terms of improved in vitro activity and pharmacokinetics. Whether these advantages translate into improved clinical outcomes is presently unknown. The new fluoroquinolones have the potential to emerge as important therapeutic agents in the treatment of respiratory tract and genitourinary tract infections.

Trovafloxacin: a new fluoroquinolone

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of trovafloxacin.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (January 1966-April 1998) was conducted for relevant literature using the terms CP-99,219, CP-116,519, trovafloxacin, and alatrofloxacin. Abstracts published by the American Society of Microbiology during 1995-1997 meetings were also reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All in vitro, animal, and human studies were reviewed for the antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of trovafloxacin.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Trovafloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone with enhanced activity against gram-positive and anaerobic microorganisms. The oral bioavailability under fasting conditions is approximately 88%. The elimination half-life of trovafloxacin is approximately 10 hours. Less than 10% of trovafloxacin is eliminated unchanged in the urine. Trovafloxacin is effective in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and nosocomial pneumonia with cure rates of > 90% and 77%, respectively. Trovafloxacin is comparable with ceftriaxone in the treatment of meningococcal meningitis in children; each produces a cure rate of approximately 90%. In treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection, both ciprofloxacin and trovafloxacin achieve an eradication rate of > or = 93%. Trovafloxacin is similar to ofloxacin in the treatment of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, with clinical success in 97% of patients with each drug. The common adverse effects of trovafloxacin include dizziness, headache, and gastrointestinal intolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

The advantages of once-daily dosing and enhanced activity of trovafloxacin against gram-positive and anaerobic organisms may expand its use over available fluoroquinolones. Further studies are needed to define its role in the treatment of various infectious diseases.

Trovafloxacin: an overview

Trovafloxacin, a new synthetic naphthyridine fluoroquinolone antibiotic, is a broad-spectrum agent available orally and intravenously. It was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of selected pulmonary, surgical, intraabdominal, gynecologic, pelvic, skin, and urinary tract infections. Its spectrum of activity includes aerobic gram-positive and gram-negative organisms as well as anaerobic pathogens. It is rapidly absorbed after oral administration, achieves good tissue and cerebrospinal fluid penetration, and has a half-life that allows once-daily dosing. It is hepatically metabolized, and dosage adjustments are necessary for patients with severe hepatic dysfunction but not for those with mild or moderate dysfunction or renal dysfunction. The drug has a favorable safety profile, and a high tendency for transient first-dose dizziness and/or lightheadedness in young women. Similar to other quinolones, trovafloxacin should not be taken with antacids that contain aluminum or magnesium, sucralfate, or ferrous sulfate. Trovafloxacin may prove beneficial as it allows for oral or intravenous monotherapy against indicated infections that normally require multidrug, broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage.

Levofloxacin: a therapeutic review

This therapeutic review discusses the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, in vitro activity, drug interactions, and adverse effects of levofloxacin, a fluoroquinolone antibiotic. Particular emphasis is placed on the clinical efficacy of levofloxacin and its place in therapy. Compared with ciprofloxacin and the earlier quinolone agents, levofloxacin has an improved pharmacokinetic profile that allows convenient once-daily dosing in either an oral or parenteral formulation. Levofloxacin has enhanced activity against gram-positive aerobic organisms, including penicillin-resistant pneumococci. In published comparative trials involving commonly used treatment regimens, levofloxacin had equivalent if not greater activity in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, acute bacterial sinusitis, acute pyelonephritis, and complicated urinary tract infection. Levofloxacin is well tolerated and induces minimal adverse drug reactions. Based on the above attributes, it may be reasonable to include levofloxacin on the hospital formulary in place of older quinolones. More recently released quinolones such as trovafloxacin exhibit similar advantages; however, until direct comparative trials between levofloxacin and these newer agents are conducted, it is difficult to advocate one agent over another. Regardless of which quinolone is the primary agent on the formulary, it is imperative that this class of antimicrobial drugs be used with discretion to minimize the development of resistance.

Treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: comparison of trovafloxacin and amoxicillin in a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy study. Trovafloxacin Bronchitis Study Group

The efficacy and safety of trovafloxacin and amoxicillin were compared in a double-blind, double-dummy multicentre trial involving 412 patients (> or = 40 years of age) with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECBs). Patients were randomized to 5 days' oral treatment with 200 or 100 mg trovafloxacin administered once daily, or 500 mg amoxicillin given three times daily. Overall clinical efficacy at the end of therapy was similar in each treatment group, with clinical success (cure+improvement) achieved in 88% and 91% of clinically evaluable patients receiving trovafloxacin 200 mg and 100 mg, respectively, and in 89% of amoxicillin-treated patients. Corresponding rates at follow-up were 77%, 85% and 79%, respectively. Similar responses were noted at the end of treatment and end of study in the intent-to-treat patients. Although all three treatments produced similar bacteriological efficacy, there was a trend towards higher eradication rates for Haemophilus influenzae among patients (both clinically evaluable and intent-to-treat populations) treated with trovafloxacin 200 mg compared with those treated with amoxicillin. Both drugs were well tolerated, with treatment-related adverse events, of which headache and gastrointestinal disturbances were the most common, occurring in 12% and 6% of patients in the trovafloxacin 200 mg and 100 mg groups, respectively, and in 9% of amoxicillin-treated patients.

An open, controlled, crossover study on the effects of cimetidine on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of trovafloxacin

Twelve healthy male volunteers participated in this open, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study to investigate the effects of cimetidine on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of oral trovafloxacin. Volunteers were randomized to receive either 400 mg cimetidine twice daily or placebo for 5 days. From day 3-5, volunteers received 200 mg trovafloxacin once daily in addition to either cimetidine or placebo. After a minimum 7-day washout period, the study was repeated: those volunteers who received placebo during the first study period were administered cimetidine, and vice versa. The maximum observed serum trovafloxacin concentration, the area under the concentration-time curve of trovafloxacin within the dosing interval of 24 h and the earliest time to the maximum serum concentration for trovafloxacin in volunteers receiving concomitant cimetidine were 2.4 microg/ml. 27.8 microg x h/ml and 1.4 h, respectively, compared with 2.5 microg/ml, 27.1 microg x h/ml and 1.5 h, respectively, in volunteers receiving concomitant placebo. Thus. multiple dosing with cimetidine had no significant effect on the absorption or disposition of trovafloxacin at steady state. Co-administration of cimetidine and trovafloxacin was also well tolerated and without serious adverse effects.

Bacteriological activity of trovafloxacin, a new quinolone, against respiratory tract pathogens

The use of established fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, as empirical therapy for the treatment of moderate-to-severe respiratory tract infections is limited by their poor activity against gram-positive and atypical pathogens. Data from in vitro susceptibility studies and in vivo animal protection models suggest that the new fluoroquinolone, trovafloxacin, compared with ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin offers equivalent activity against gram-negative pathogens and improved activity against gram-positive pathogens. In particular, susceptibility data indicate that trovafloxacin is at least 16-fold more potent than either ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin against penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Other susceptible pathogens include Streptococcus pyogenes, vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecalis and the atypical respiratory pathogens Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae. In vivo studies involving models of protection against acute systemic infection and pneumococcal pneumonia in mice, and Legionnaires' disease in guinea pigs, indicate that the antibacterial spectrum observed for trovafloxacin in vitro extends to the in vivo setting. Together, these findings suggest that trovafloxacin may offer clinical efficacy against respiratory pathogens superior to that of ciprofloxacin and of ofloxacin, and may find a useful role as empiric therapy in both the community and hospital setting.

Levofloxacin and sparfloxacin: new quinolone antibiotics

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, spectrum of activity, clinical trials, and adverse effects of levofloxacin and sparfloxacin, two new fluoroquinolone antibiotics.

DATA SOURCES

Literature was identified by a MEDLINE search from January 1985 to September 1997. Abstracts and presentations were identified by review of program abstracts from the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy from 1988 to 1996.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled clinical studies were selected for evaluation; however, uncontrolled studies were included when data were limited for indications approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). In vitro data were selected from comparison trials whenever available. Only in vitro trials that provided data on the minimum inhibitory concentrations required to inhibit 90% of isolates were used. Data from North American studies were selected whenever available.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were evaluated with respect to in vitro activity, study design, clinical and microbiologic outcomes, and adverse drug reactions.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Levofloxacin and sparfloxacin are active against pathogens frequently involved in community-acquired upper and lower respiratory tract infections, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Chlamydia pneumoniae. Both compounds have enhanced activity compared with ciprofloxacin against most gram-positive bacteria, including enterococci, streptococci, and staphylococci, and retain good activity against most Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sparfloxacin has greater anaerobic activity than levofloxacin, which is more active than ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin. Although many clinical studies are available only in abstract form, the clinical data demonstrate that these new quinolones are effective for most community-acquired upper and lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, gonococcal and nongonococcal urethritis, and skin and skin structure infections. FDA-approved indications are limited for both compounds to date.

CONCLUSIONS

Levofloxacin and sparfloxacin have improved gram-positive activity compared with that of older fluoroquinolones, and are administered once daily. Sparfloxacin-associated photosensitivity may limit its therapeutic usefulness. Clinical trials confirm that these agents are as effective as traditional therapies for the management of community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, sinusitis, urinary tract infections, acute gonococcal and nongonococcal urethritis, and skin and skin structure infections.

In vitro activity of trovafloxacin against Chlamydia pneumoniae

The in vitro susceptibilities of 12 strains of Chlamydia pneumoniae to a new quinolone, trovafloxacin, and ofloxacin, doxycycline, erythromycin, and azithromycin were determined. The activity of trovafloxacin was similar to that of ofloxacin, with a MIC at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited and a minimal concentration at which 90% of the isolates are killed of 1.0 microg/ml, but trovafloxacin was less active than doxycycline, erythromycin, and azithromycin.