Use of antithrombin III in critical patients

Optimal Antithrombin Activity Threshold for Initiating Antithrombin Supplementation in Patients With Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study

Low-dose antithrombin supplementation therapy (1500 IU/d for 3 days) improves outcomes in patients with sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). This retrospective study evaluated the optimal antithrombin activity threshold to initiate supplementation, and the effects of supplementation therapy in 1033 patients with sepsis-induced DIC whose antithrombin activity levels were measured upon admission to 42 intensive care units across Japan. Of the 509 patients who had received antithrombin supplementation therapy, in-hospital mortality was significantly reduced only in patients with very low antithrombin activity (≤43%; bottom quartile; adjusted hazard ratio: 0.603; 95% confidence interval: 0.368-0.988; P = .045). Similar associations were not observed in patients with low, moderate, or normal antithrombin activity levels. Supplementation therapy did not correlate with the incidence of bleeding requiring transfusion. The adjusted hazard ratios for in-hospital mortality increased gradually with antithrombin activity only when initial activity levels were very low to normal but plateaued thereafter. We conclude that antithrombin supplementation therapy in patients with sepsis-induced DIC and very low antithrombin activity may improve survival without increasing the risk of bleeding.

The Management of Sepsis: A Practical Review

The incidence of the sepsis syndrome has increased dramatically in the last few decades. During this time we have gained new insights into the pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to organ dysfunction in sepsis and the importance of the host-bacterial interactions in mediating many of these processes. This knowledge has led to new therapeutic approaches and the investigation of a number of novel agents. An assessment of these approaches is presented to aid clinicians in the management of patients with severe sepsis. Criteria used to select studies included their relevance to the management of sepsis and their pertinence to clinicians. Appropriate antibiotic selection and volume resuscitation remain the cornerstone of treatment of septic patients. Hydroxyethyl starch solutions have theoretical advantages over crystalloids; there is, however, no data that the type of resuscitation fluid alters outcome. Vasoactive agents are required in patients who remain hemodynamically unstable or have evidence of tissue hypoxia after adequate volume resuscitation. Although dopamine is widely used, dobutamine and norepinephrine are our vasoactive agents of choice. Dopamine has no proven role in oliguric patients, with early dialysis recommended in patients with acute renal failure. The preferred method of renal replacement therapy remains to be determined. Blood products should be used cautiously in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Therapeutic strategies that interfere with the immune system have not been proven to improve the outcome in unselected groups of patients. However, immunomodulation may prove to have a role in select subgroups of patients. Antibiotic therapy and intensive physiological support continues to be the main approach to the management of patients with severe sepsis. Despite the development of numerous novel therapeutic agents, these drugs have not been demonstrated to improve patient outcome.

Antithrombin III for critically ill patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Purpose

Antithrombin III (AT III) is an anticoagulant with anti-inflammatory properties. We assessed the benefits and harms of AT III in critically ill patients.

Methods

We searched from inception to 27 August 2015 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CAB, BIOSIS and CINAHL. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) irrespective of publication status, date of publication, blinding status, outcomes published or language.

Results

We included 30 RCTs with a total of 3933 participants. The majority of included trials were at high risk of bias. Combining all trials, regardless of bias, showed no statistically significant effect of AT III on mortality (RR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.88–1.03, I² = 0 %, fixed-effect model, 29 trials, 3882 participants). Among those with severe sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), AT III showed no impact on mortality (RR 0.95, 95 % Cl 0.88–1.03, I² = 0 %, fixed-effect model, 12 trials, 2858 participants). We carried out multiple subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the benefits and harms of AT III and to examine the impact of risk of bias. AT III significantly increased bleeding events (RR 1.58, 95 % CI 1.35–1.84, I² = 0 %, fixed-effect model, 11 trials, 3019 participants). However, for all other outcome measures and analyses, the results did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

There is insufficient evidence to support AT III substitution in any category of critically ill participants including those with sepsis and DIC. AT III did not show an impact on mortality, but increased the risk of bleeding.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4225-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Antithrombin III for critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Critical illness is associated with uncontrolled inflammation and vascular damage which can result in multiple organ failure and death. Antithrombin III (AT III) is an anticoagulant with anti-inflammatory properties but the efficacy and any harmful effects of AT III supplementation in critically ill patients are unknown. This review was published in 2008 and updated in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To examine:1. The effect of AT III on mortality in critically ill participants.2. The benefits and harms of AT III.We investigated complications specific and not specific to the trial intervention, bleeding events, the effect on sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in hospital in general.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases from inception to 27 August 2015: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid SP), EMBASE (Ovid SP,), CAB, BIOSIS and CINAHL. We contacted the main authors of trials to ask for any missed, unreported or ongoing trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) irrespective of publication status, date of publication, blinding status, outcomes published, or language. We contacted the investigators and the trial authors in order to retrieve missing data. In this updated review we include trials only published as abstracts.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Our primary outcome measure was mortality. Two authors each independently abstracted data and resolved any disagreements by discussion. We presented pooled estimates of the intervention effects on dichotomous outcomes as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We performed subgroup analyses to assess risk of bias, the effect of AT III in different populations (sepsis, trauma, obstetrics, and paediatrics), and the effect of AT III in patients with or without the use of concomitant heparin. We assessed the adequacy of the available number of participants and performed trial sequential analysis (TSA) to establish the implications for further research.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 30 RCTs with a total of 3933 participants (3882 in the primary outcome analyses).Combining all trials, regardless of bias, showed no statistically significant effect of AT III on mortality with a RR of 0.95 (95% CI 0.88 to 1.03), I² statistic = 0%, fixed-effect model, 29 trials, 3882 participants, moderate quality of evidence). For trials with low risk of bias the RR was 0.96 (95% Cl 0.88 to 1.04, I² statistic = 0%, fixed-effect model, 9 trials, 2915 participants) and for high risk of bias RR 0.94 (95% Cl 0.77 to 1.14, I² statistic = 0%, fixed-effect model, 20 trials, 967 participants).For participants with severe sepsis and DIC the RR for mortality was non-significant, 0.95 (95% Cl 0.88 to 1.03, I² statistic = 0%, fixed-effect model, 12 trials, 2858 participants, moderate quality of evidence).We conducted 14 subgroup and sensitivity analyses with respect to the different domains of risk of bias, but detected no statistically significant benefit in any subgroup analyses.Our secondary objective was to assess the benefits and harms of AT III. For complications specific to the trial intervention the RR was 1.26 (95% Cl 0.83 to 1.92, I² statistic = 0%, random-effect model, 3 trials, 2454 participants, very low quality of evidence). For complications not specific to the trial intervention, the RR was 0.71 (95% Cl 0.08 to 6.11, I² statistic = 28%, random-effects model, 2 trials, 65 participants, very low quality of evidence). For complications other than bleeding, the RR was 0.72 ( 95% Cl 0.42 to 1.25, I² statistic = 0%, fixed-effect model, 3 trials, 187 participants, very low quality of evidence). Eleven trials investigated bleeding events and we found a statistically significant increase, RR 1.58 (95% CI 1.35 to 1.84, I² statistic = 0%, fixed-effect model, 11 trials, 3019 participants, moderate quality of evidence) in the AT III group. The amount of red blood cells administered had a mean difference (MD) of 138.49 (95% Cl -391.35 to 668.34, I² statistic = 84%, random-effect model, 4 trials, 137 participants, very low quality of evidence). The effect of AT III in patients with multiple organ failure (MOF) was a MD of -1.24 (95% Cl -2.18 to -0.29, I² statistic = 48%, random-effects model, 3 trials, 156 participants, very low quality of evidence) and for patients with an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score (APACHE) at II and III the MD was -2.18 (95% Cl -4.36 to -0.00, I² statistic = 0%, fixed-effect model, 3 trials, 102 participants, very low quality of evidence). The incidence of respiratory failure had a RR of 0.93 (95% Cl 0.76 to 1.14, I² statistic = 32%, random-effects model, 6 trials, 2591 participants, moderate quality of evidence). AT III had no statistically significant impact on the duration of mechanical ventilation (MD 2.20 days, 95% Cl -1.21 to 5.60, I² statistic = 0%, fixed-effect model, 3 trials, 190 participants, very low quality of evidence); on the length of stay in the ICU (MD 0.24, 95% Cl -1.34 to 1.83, I² statistic = 0%, fixed-effect model, 7 trials, 376 participants, very low quality of evidence) or on the length of stay in hospital in general (MD 1.10, 95% Cl -7.16 to 9.36), I² statistic = 74%, 4 trials, 202 participants, very low quality of evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support AT III substitution in any category of critically ill participants including the subset of patients with sepsis and DIC. We did not find a statistically significant effect of AT III on mortality, but AT III increased the risk of bleeding events. Subgroup analyses performed according to duration of intervention, length of follow-up, different patient groups, and use of adjuvant heparin did not show differences in the estimates of intervention effects. The majority of included trials were at high risk of bias (GRADE; very low quality of evidence for most of the analyses). Hence a large RCT of AT III is needed, without adjuvant heparin among critically ill patients such as those with severe sepsis and DIC, with prespecified inclusion criteria and good bias protection.

Animal models of sepsis

Sepsis remains a common, serious, and heterogeneous clinical entity that is difficult to define adequately. Despite its importance as a public health problem, efforts to develop and gain regulatory approval for a specific therapeutic agent for the adjuvant treatment of sepsis have been remarkably unsuccessful. One step in the critical pathway for the development of a new agent for adjuvant treatment of sepsis is evaluation in an appropriate animal model of the human condition. Unfortunately, the animal models that have been used for this purpose have often yielded misleading findings. It is likely that there are multiple reasons for the discrepancies between the results obtained in tests of pharmacological agents in animal models of sepsis and the outcomes of human clinical trials. One of important reason may be that the changes in gene expression, which are triggered by trauma or infection, are different in mice, a commonly used species for preclinical testing, and humans. Additionally, many species, including mice and baboons, are remarkably resistant to the toxic effects of bacterial lipopolysaccharide, whereas humans are exquisitely sensitive. New approaches toward the use of animals for sepsis research are being investigated. But, at present, results from preclinical studies of new therapeutic agents for sepsis must be viewed with a degree of skepticism.

Management of bleeding following major trauma: an updated European guideline

INTRODUCTION

Evidence-based recommendations are needed to guide the acute management of the bleeding trauma patient, which when implemented may improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

The multidisciplinary Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma was formed in 2005 with the aim of developing a guideline for the management of bleeding following severe injury. This document presents an updated version of the guideline published by the group in 2007. Recommendations were formulated using a nominal group process, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) hierarchy of evidence and based on a systematic review of published literature.

RESULTS

Key changes encompassed in this version of the guideline include new recommendations on coagulation support and monitoring and the appropriate use of local haemostatic measures, tourniquets, calcium and desmopressin in the bleeding trauma patient. The remaining recommendations have been reevaluated and graded based on literature published since the last edition of the guideline. Consideration was also given to changes in clinical practice that have taken place during this time period as a result of both new evidence and changes in the general availability of relevant agents and technologies.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline provides an evidence-based multidisciplinary approach to the management of critically injured bleeding trauma patients.

Antithrombin III for critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Critical illness is associated with uncontrolled inflammation and vascular damage which can result in multiple organ failure and death. Antithrombin III (AT III) is an anticoagulant with anti-inflammatory properties but the efficacy and any harmful effects of AT III supplementation in critically ill patients are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of AT III in critically ill patients.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library); MEDLINE; EMBASE; Science Citation Index Expanded; International Web of Science; CINAHL; LILACS; and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (up to November 2006). We contacted authors and manufacturers in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized clinical trials, irrespective of blinding or language, that compared AT III with no intervention or placebo in critically ill patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Our primary outcome measure was mortality. We each independently abstracted data and resolved any disagreements by discussion. We presented pooled estimates of the intervention effects on dichotomous outcomes as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We performed subgroup analyses to assess risk of bias, the effect of AT III in different populations (sepsis, trauma, obstetric, and paediatric patients), and the effect of AT III in patients with or without the use of concomitant heparin. We assessed the adequacy of the available number of participants and performed a trial sequential analysis to establish the implications for further research.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 20 randomized trials with a total of 3458 participants; 13 of these trials had high risk of bias. When we combined all trials, AT III did not statistically significantly reduce overall mortality compared with the control group (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.03; no heterogeneity between trials). A total of 32 subgroup and sensitivity analyses were carried out. Analyses based on risk of bias, different populations, and the role of adjuvant heparin gave insignificant differences. AT III reduced the multiorgan failure score among survivors in an analysis involving very few patients. AT III increased bleeding events (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.78).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

AT III cannot be recommended for critically ill patients based on the available evidence. A randomized controlled trial of AT III, without adjuvant heparin, with prespecified inclusion criteria and good bias protection is needed.

A systematic review of antithrombin concentrate use in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation of severe sepsis

The objective was to estimate the effect of antithrombin therapy on mortality in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) of severe sepsis and septic shock. Randomized clinical trials (RCT) on patients with DIC and severe sepsis or septic shock assigned to intravenous antithrombin or placebo were searched. Eligible studies reported death as the outcome measure. Of 35 RCT, 32 trials were excluded because patients were not randomized to antithrombin versus placebo, or no separate data on patients with DIC were given. In three RCT, 364 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and DIC were randomized. The disease severity, definition of DIC, dose and duration of treatment varied among the trials. In two of the three RCT, data were from subgroup analyses (patients not stratified by DIC). The combined odds ratio for short-term all-cause mortality in those who received antithrombin was 0.649 (95% confidence interval, 0.422-0.998). Data on bleeding complications in patients treated with antithrombin were reported only in one of the RCT and were not considered suitable for systematic safety estimation. In sepsis patients with DIC, administration of antithrombin concentrate may increase overall survival. Current available evidence, however, is not suited to sufficiently inform clinical practice.

Management of bleeding following major trauma: a European guideline

INTRODUCTION

Evidence-based recommendations can be made with respect to many aspects of the acute management of the bleeding trauma patient, which when implemented may lead to improved patient outcomes.

METHODS

The multidisciplinary Task Force for Advanced Bleeding Care in Trauma was formed in 2005 with the aim of developing guidelines for the management of bleeding following severe injury. Recommendations were formulated using a nominal group process and the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) hierarchy of evidence and were based on a systematic review of published literature.

RESULTS

Key recommendations include the following: The time elapsed between injury and operation should be minimised for patients in need of urgent surgical bleeding control, and patients presenting with haemorrhagic shock and an identified source of bleeding should undergo immediate surgical bleeding control unless initial resuscitation measures are successful. A damage control surgical approach is essential in the severely injured patient. Pelvic ring disruptions should be closed and stabilised, followed by appropriate angiographic embolisation or surgical bleeding control, including packing. Patients presenting with haemorrhagic shock and an unidentified source of bleeding should undergo immediate further assessment as appropriate using focused sonography, computed tomography, serum lactate, and/or base deficit measurements. This guideline also reviews appropriate physiological targets and suggested use and dosing of blood products, pharmacological agents, and coagulation factor replacement in the bleeding trauma patient.

CONCLUSION

A multidisciplinary approach to the management of the bleeding trauma patient will help create circumstances in which optimal care can be provided. By their very nature, these guidelines reflect the current state-of-the-art and will need to be updated and revised as important new evidence becomes available.

Novel therapies for sepsis: a review

BACKGROUND

Over the past 30 years, efforts have been made to identify therapeutic targets in the host response to infection.

METHODS

A review of the randomized controlled clinical sepsis trials and meta-analyses of glucocorticoids, mediator-specific anti-inflammatory agents, and anticoagulant agents was performed.

RESULTS

The effects of glucocorticoids in sepsis appear to be dose-dependent, with high doses decreasing survival and low doses improving survival. As a class, the mediator-specific anti-inflammatory agents have a small beneficial effect on survival; however, no single agent has demonstrated significant benefit. The treatment effects of these agents appear to be related to the patient's risk of death. As a class, the anticoagulant agents do not improve survival; however, the efficacy of these agents may have been confounded by concurrent heparin therapy. Activated protein C demonstrated a beneficial effect on survival that was dependent on severity of illness.

CONCLUSION

Trials of agents directed at altering the host's response during sepsis have had variable results, and it appears that several different factors may alter the efficacy of these agents.

Coagulation dysfunction in sepsis and multiple organ system failure

In patients diagnosed with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock, cytokine-mediated endothelial injury, and TF activation initiate a cascade of events that culminate in the development of coagulation dysfunction characterized as procoagulant and antifibrinolytic. This abnormal state predisposes the patient to develop microvascular thrombosis, tissue ischemia, and organ hypoperfusion. Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome may be a product of this pertubation in coagulation regulation. Treatments aimed at correcting this coagulation dysfunction have met with mixed success. Current data suggest that AT III replacement therapy has limited efficacy in adults with severe sepsis. In contrast, adult patients diagnosed with severe sepsis and organ failure and treated with aPC (drotrecogin alfa activate) have a significantly reduced risk of death when compared with placebo-treated patients. A phase III trial examining the efficacy of protein C replacement therapy in pediatric patients with severe sepsis and organ failure is underway.

High dose of antithrombin III induces indefinite survival of fully allogeneic cardiac grafts and generates regulatory cells

BACKGROUND

The authors investigated whether antithrombin III (AT-III) could induce unresponsiveness to alloantigens.

METHODS

CBA mice were given intravenous injection of 50 or 500 U/kg AT-III or control plasma the same day as transplantation of a heart from a C57BL/6 mouse. An adoptive transfer study and mixed leukocyte culture analysis were also performed.

RESULTS

Naive CBA mice rejected C57BL/6 cardiac grafts acutely (median survival time [MST], 9 days). The 50-U/kg dose of AT-III induced a moderate increase in graft survival (MST, 25 days), whereas control mice rejected their graft acutely (MST, 7 days). With the 500-U/kg dose of AT-III, all grafts survived indefinitely (>100 days) and regulatory cells were generated. In vitro, AT-III suppressed proliferation of mixed leukocyte responses and generation of interleukin-2.

CONCLUSION

AT-III can be not only an antithrombotic agent but also a strong immunomodulating agent when used at high dose.

Clinical trial results with antithrombin III in sepsis

OBJECTIVE

To present and discuss the rationale and results of clinical trials using antithrombin (AT) supplementation in patients with sepsis.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SELECTION

Review of all controlled (open or double-blind) studies of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock who were treated with AT concentrates to obtain better control of coagulation activation and inflammation.

DATA EXTRACTION

AT is a major inhibitor of the coagulation cascade. Recent experimental studies have also shown that it can modulate the inflammatory reactions that occur during sepsis. An early and prolonged decrease in AT activity is well documented during sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation and during the systemic inflammatory response. Thus, supplementation with AT concentrates has been proposed as a potential therapy in sepsis patients.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Numerous uncontrolled studies of AT supplementation in sepsis patients have been reported in the last 20 yrs. Since 1993, four placebo-controlled randomized studies have been performed in France, Germany, Northwestern Europe, and Italy. Three of these studies were subjected to a meta-analysis of 122 patients. Results showed a nonsignificant 22% reduction in the 30-day all-cause mortality and a reduction in the length of stay in the intensive care unit in the AT treated group. The Italian study of 120 patients demonstrated that the overall mortality was similar in the placebo and treated groups. However, post hoc analysis according to the Cox regression model showed that in patients with septic shock, AT supplementation significantly decreased the risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Together, these studies are consistent with the positive effect seen with AT supplementation in patients with severe sepsis. A multicenter phase III trial is currently in progress to definitively document its effect on mortality.

Antithrombin III and local serum application: adjuvant therapy in peritonitis

BACKGROUND

Patients with diffuse peritonitis show an overall mortality of about 20%, probably caused by the breakdown of local defence mechanisms combined with a systemic outspread of bacteria and toxins, which often results in sepsis syndrome.

DESIGN

In a prospective, randomized, controlled study 50 patients with diffuse secondary peritonitis were included. Patients in the therapy group were treated with an adjuvant medication consisting of a continuous intravenous infusion of antithrombin III and two intraperitoneal instillations of fresh frozen human donor serum. The aim of the study was the reduction of mortality and incidence of multiple organ failure.

RESULTS

Mean antithrombin III plasma levels in the therapy group were raised above 140% for 4 days and were significantly higher than in the control group. With the intraperitoneal application of fresh frozen serum and antithrombin III opsonic capacity as well as thrombin, inhibitory activity in the exudate could be significantly elevated over 2 days. The 90-day-mortality rate was 6/26 (23%) in the control group and 6/24 (25%) in the therapy group. Although no improvement of mortality was achieved, a slight but not significant reduction of the severity of the multiple organ failure was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

The chosen therapeutic approach was feasible and showed no side-effects. Yet, neither mortality nor multiple organ failure were significantly improved by the applied short-term adjuvant therapy. Thus, for future trials in severely-ill patients a longer treatment period and/or combinations of antithrombin III with other anti-inflammatory agents should be considered.

High-dose antithrombin III treatment of severely injured patients: results of a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Antithrombin III (AT III) treatment has been shown to reduce disseminated intravascular coagulation and to inhibit thrombin, which plays a central role in the activation of platelets and other inflammatory systems in conditions with severe inflammation. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of early and high-dose administration of AT III to patients with severe multiple injuries on the inflammatory response and outcome.

METHODS

In a placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 40 consecutive patients with Injury Severity Scores of 29 or greater who met the inclusion criteria were randomized to receive either AT III or placebo within 360 minutes after trauma. Twenty patients were administered AT III for a period of 4 days, aiming to achieve AT III concentrations of 140% of normal.

RESULTS

The AT III and placebo groups were comparable with respect to Injury Severity Score, age, incidence of blood pressure less than 80 mm Hg on admission, initial base deficit, and start of the test drug. The patients in the AT III group received a total of about 20,000 IU during the first 4 days. AT III levels of 130 to 140% could be achieved by this regimen, whereas in the control group the AT III concentration averaged about 70%. In the AT III group prothrombin tended to be elevated and prothrombin fragment F1+2 as well as thrombin-AT III complex tended to be lower on the first day. No differences between groups, however, could be observed with respect to partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, platelets, plasminogen activator inhibitor I, soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor II, neutrophil elastase, interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist, IL-6, and IL-8. Mortality (15 vs. 5%), incidence of respiratory failure (55 vs. 55%), duration of mechanical ventilation (13 vs. 12 days), and length of stay in the surgical intensive care unit (19 vs. 21 days) were also similar in both treatment groups. The duration of organ failure, however, was shorter in the patients receiving AT III.

CONCLUSION

The early and high-dose administration of AT III to patients with severe blunt trauma appears not to attenuate the posttraumatic inflammatory response or to significantly improve outcome.

Is there a need for antithrombin III substitution early after burn injury?

The changes in antithrombin III (AT-III) levels in the blood and restitution in coagulation parameters between patients receiving and not receiving AT-III substitution were examined early after burn injury. The study was divided into two parts with a total of 14 consecutive patients (per cent total body surface area (TBSA) > or = 20 per cent). The first six patients were given AT-III substitution when AT-III levels fell below 50 per cent. The second part examined the restitution of the coagulation parameters when the patients (n = 8) obtained AT-III substitution only at extremely low values of AT-III. The decline in AT-III observed occurred in parallel to the permeability changes and the haemodilution normally seen secondarily to the initial fluid rescucitation. The observed changes in the coagulation parameters were modest and no hepatic dysfunction was noted. In addition, no differences of the restitution in these coagulation parameters were noted between the substituted and non-substituted groups. These results suggest that changes in AT-III early after burn injury depend mainly on factors other than an ongoing disseminated coagulation process. Probable causes are increased capillary leak and haemodilution. Our results suggest that substitution of AT-III in the early postburn period, on the assumption that low levels alone indicate ongoing coagulation, is not warranted.

Effect of critical injury on plasma antithrombin activity: low antithrombin levels are associated with thromboembolic complications

OBJECTIVE

Determine whether severe injury results in decreased plasma antithrombin (AT) activity and whether this decreased AT activity is associated with thromboembolic complications.

DESIGN

Prospective observational.

SUBJECTS

A total of 157 critically injured trauma patients.

METHODS

Each patient underwent laboratory analysis on arrival to the emergency room at hours 8, 16, 24, and 48, and days 3, 4, 5, and 6. Laboratory analyses included AT, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, protein C, prothrombin fragment 1.2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, and D-dimer. Patients were followed for thromboembolic complications including: deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolus, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

RESULTS

Mean Injury Severity Score was 23 (+/-11). AT activity fell below normal in 95 (61%) patients; AT activity rose to greater than normal in 51 (32%) patients. Nine (6%) patients developed DVT, two (1%) pulmonary embolus, 13 (8%) DIC and 26 (17%) ARDS. Using logistic regression analysis, low AT levels were a significant predictor of DVT, DIC, and ARDS (p < 0.05). Supranormal At levels were associated with closed head injury (p < 0.05). D-dimer levels were inversely correlated with AT (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

AT activity was depressed in critically injured patients. Patients with head injury developed supranormal AT activity. The risk factors for AT deficiency mimicked those for thromboembolism. Patients with decreased AT activity were at increased risk for thromboembolic complications. Given heparin's dependence on AT, these data call into question the use of unmonitored heparin thromboembolism prophylaxis.